David takes the first ten minutes to respond to Twitter trolls over his latest New York Times article before he and Sarah revisit their arguments over the Supreme Court’s per curium ruling on the Trump-Colorado case.
The Agenda:
—Defending the Supreme Court
—Erasing the Constitution
—Confusion over the Trump ruling
—Consequentialism vs. originalism
—Judicial restraint and originalism
—Erasing Chevron
—SCOTUS hears bump stock case
—Explaining the string cheese factors
Show Notes:
-Kevin Williamson: Slate Publishes Gun-Control Fiction
-Advisory Opinions Episode with Professor Amanda Tyler
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
David Responds to Trolls | Advisory Opinions podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast
