On today’s episode, David and Sarah talk about the recent Supreme Court term with Kannon Shanmugam, a Supreme Court litigant and a partner at Paul Weiss LLP. Our hosts ask Shanmugam what it’s like to argue cases remotely, how much the Supreme Court has changed during Amy Coney Barrett’s first term, and about the court’s judicial philosophy on issues like free speech and qualified immunity. Shanmugam talks about the cases he argued this term and explains how he chooses which clients to represent pro bono.
Show Notes:
-Borden v. United States
-BP v. Baltimore
-Goldman Sachs v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
-Henry Schein v. Archer and White
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
And May it Please the Court | Advisory Opinions podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast
