Sarah and David welcome special guest Anthony Sanders, director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice, to eviscerate Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Plus: David’s rant on Presumed Innocent.
The Agenda:
—Judicial engagement
—Social Darwinism and “putting to death the inadequate”
—Progressive forgiveness for progressives
—First Amendment
—Civil rights and judicial abdications
—Holmes’ defense of sterilization
—The difference between judicial progressives, liberals, and libertarians
—Spoiler alerts for Presumed Innocent
Show Notes:
—Kelo v. New London
—Institute of Justice’s Bound by Oath podcast series
—Oliver Wendell Holmes’ The Common Law
—Moore v. Dempsey
—Buck v. Bell
—Albert Alschuler’s Law Without Values
—Giles v. Harris
—Bailey v. Alabama
—Buchanan v. Warley
—Skinner v. Oklahoma
—Lochner v. New York
—Minersville School District v. Gobitis
Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Progressivism and Eugenics in the Court of Justice Holmes | Advisory Opinions podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast
