Kannon Shanmugam and his summer associates return to Advisory Opinions to look back on the SCOTUS term and discuss the state of “text, history, and tradition.”
The Agenda:
—Big themes from this SCOTUS term
—Was this the administrative law term?
—Should we stop thinking about SCOTUS “terms”?
—The health of the First Amendment
—“The media now owns Amy Coney Barrett”
—Justice Thomas’ dissent in Rahimi
—Sarah’s summary of this term
—Questions from summer associates
Show Notes:
—Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
—Moody v. NetChoice
—FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
—National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo
—SEC v. Jarkesy
—Trump v. Anderson
—Trump v. United States
—United States v. Rahimi
—New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen
—Justice Samuel Alito’s WSJ op-ed
—Sarah’s 3-3-3 theory
—Christian Laettner’s shot against Kentucky
Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Is ‘Text, History, and Tradition’ Alive and Well? | Advisory Opinions podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast
