![Can the Supreme Court save us from ourselves? - podcast episode cover](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.simplecastcdn.com%2Fimages%2F00fe5eb2-fcc8-4fb7-a230-bc91bef82b31%2F3bf395fb-9cbf-48e4-82a6-060f581a354e%2F3000x3000%2Fcivics101logo-v3.jpg%3Faid%3Drss_feed&w=640&q=75)
Episode description
When the Supreme Court says something is or isn't constitutional, what does that really mean? What are the effects, or lack thereof, of their decisions? And what do we do if we don't agree with what they say?
Today Linda Monk, author of The Bill of Rights: A User's Guide, walks us through four times in US History that the Supreme Court was not the be-all-end-all decision maker.
Here are some links to shows we reference in the episode:
Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka
Want our new "Civics is my cup of tea" mug? CLICK HERE TO DONATE AND GET YOURS!
- CLICK HERE: Visit our website to see all of our episodes, donate to the podcast, sign up for our newsletter, get free educational materials, and more!
- To see Civics 101 in book form, check out A User's Guide to Democracy: How America Works by Hannah McCarthy and Nick Capodice, featuring illustrations by Tom Toro.
- Check out our other weekly NHPR podcast, Outside/In - we think you'll love it!