Episode description

Ever wondered how to navigate the complex world of reading research as an educator? Get ready for a great conversation with education researcher Neena Saha, who reveals the role of science in education and the importance of pseudoscience in developing theories. We delve into the significance of meta-analyses and discuss the need for caution when using this method.  Neena then shares some current reading research with us!

Resources

• SamePage Reading Facebook Group
• MetaMetrics’ Reading Research Recap  
• Join the Reading Research mailing list
• The Reading League Journal
• The Reading League recording on what teachers need to know about “how science works” (skip to 1 hour, 40 min)
• Meta-Analysis Review
• Robert Slavin’s Blogs
  • In Meta-Analyses, Weak Inclusion Standards Lead to Misleading Conclusions. Here’s Proof.
  • How Can You Tell When The Findings of a Meta-Analysis Are Likely to Be Valid?
  • Meta-Analysis and Its Discontents 
• Criticisms of Meta-Analysis (but also great rebuttals) 
• Morphology Recent Research Studies
  • Executive Functions and Morphological Awareness Explain the Shared Variance between Word Reading and Listening Comprehension
  • Effects of Target Age and Genre on Morphological Complexity in Children’s Reading Material
  • Contrasting Direct Instruction in Morphological Decoding and Morphological Inquiry-Analysis Interventions in Grade 3 Children With Poor Morphological Awareness
• Fluency Recent Research Study
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Readers’ Theatre impact on the development of reading skills
• Comprehension Recent Research Study 
  • Elementary Teachers’ Pe

We answer your questions about teaching reading in The Literacy 50-A Q&A Handbook for Teachers: Real-World Answers to Questions About Reading That Keep You Up at Night.

Grab free resources and episode alerts! Sign up for our email list at literacypodcast.com.

Join our community on Facebook, and follow us on Instagram, Facebook, & Twitter.