Episode description
Honor shmonor, David and Tamler return to their repugnant roots for this one. First, we pay an overdue homage to the great anonymous blogger and twitter-redeemer Neuroskeptic. We pick a few of our favorite pithy tweets and crazy science article links from his @neuro_skeptic twitter account. Topics include: How much would you pay for porn? Should we be stereotyping zoophiles? Animal or fist - how to distinguish? And what do the left and right brain actually do? In part 2, we discuss an experiment that aims to finally answer the question: do our judgments in sacrificial dilemmas (like the trolley problem) -actually- predict our behavior? Plus, we find out live (on tape) if David is a Laurel or a Yanni - or is he a Samantha?
Thanks to our sponsor www.awaytravel.com.
Sponsored By:
- Away Promo Code: BADWIZARDS
Links:
- Neuroskeptic - Wikipedia
- Neuroskeptic (@Neuro_Skeptic) | Twitter
- Neuroskeptic's Blog for Discover Magazine
- @Neuro_skeptic: "If one post sums me up"
- Two Psychologists Four Beers — New podcast hosted by VBW regular Yoel Inbar and Michael Inzlicht.
- Tatter (podcast) — New podcast, hosted by social psychologist Michael Sargent, with interviews and discussions on politics and policy.
- The Political Theory Review by Jeffrey Church on Apple Podcasts
- Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, S., & Roets, A. (2018). Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas. Psychological Science, 0956797617752640.