Welcome to The Real advisor podcast, t r a p twerp. Please follow us and join in the conversation on Twitter at advisor podcast where you can suggest ideas and themes you'd like the truck team to discuss. Also remember to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel and leave a six out of five star review on iTunes. Doing all this really, really helps us which means we can do more to help you. Now let's head over to the studio for the latest pilot trap.
Yes, indeed, their trap is welcome back to what many people are calling episode 19 of the real advisor podcast, T R A P trap. My name is Nick Lincoln and joining me as ever are the three other Horsemen of the Apocalypse and the heart call the voice widger and Alan the storyteller Smith Now gentlemen, we have a show packed full of absolutely nothing. So let's start unpacking it straightaway. I think we'll do as we normally do. We'll go to Mr. Hart to read out in his quintessentially upbeat tempo
and style. Three more reviews of crap.
Yeah, over to me, the reviews are still coming in. It's fantastic. We've got so many reviews, please do keep them coming in and I'll read them out in the show. First up, we have the review from two combs compulsory and entertaining five stars. A totally refreshing podcast aimed squarely at proper financial planners no punches held. And
thank goodness for that. Let the truth out next up is Toby Heinz who I've met in person, I think a few other people on the call have golden nuggets in every episode five stars as a relatively new advisor with a real passion for full fat planning. I'm finding the content of this podcast, invaluable, knowledgeable, experienced guys doing the job for the right reasons, and doing it in the right way. There are always a few nuggets that I take from into my own work. Finally,
it's from Duncan go. Essential five stars. Thanks, guys for a great podcast and essential for all financial advisors. Back to you, Nick Lincoln.
Thank you very much, Andrew. And we do appreciate those reviews that mean an awful lot. And it's not just the fact we're getting these lovely reviews in terms of the rating, but the time people are taking to actually craft a little story about how the the pod is helping them aside. I mean, I've just, we all really appreciate it. So thank you so much for doing that. Okay, so some topical tip bits just to put a sort of timestamp on
episode 19. In the show notes, I did ask who this was from and no one's come back to this a thing about the ONS people population and community someone will talk about that. This is why the preparation that way you guys just go the extra mile. Just passing
posted that link wasn't no idea. Move on.
It definitely wasn't because it was a UK Government link. So I'm definitely not guilty. If somebody is telling me.
We're looking at quitting and living longer now. I don't think it is. Let's go on set. Let's go into call and the real the real deal. Please call say something.
Yeah, the real deal was on last week in a place called gaffes just outside Dublin, right. And the reason I wanted to mention it was it was great to be back at an event where people were amazing people. But more importantly, way more importantly, it was an event for kind of business owners, by business owners with stories from business owners, and you just can't you just you can't be hearing from people who've been there and done that. Sorry. But what actually what
actually is it then? So it's a conference whereby it's run by a bunch of accountants called Fitzgerald power, and a corporate finance house called rhinitis. And they basically just get a bunch of successful entrepreneurs, business owners
to tell their stories. And you have tons and tons of great people and all of the I suppose business people who are who are serious about business in the wider Dublin area around it, and it was just something that it was just great to be back out there and talking to people and really well Ron. But but my my big point here is I love hearing stories from people who have been there and done that and
Arthur so many. I know you call them knacks in our industry, Nick and some are obviously very, very good at what they do. But you just can't beat hearing from people who've had experience and that was the reason I wanted to put it in there.
Lovely. Yeah, I think we all heard that. So let's just do this quite interesting. I think this was his new venture for us. On the fifth of June, one of the Track Pack is not able to make the recording that's cold. So we are going to have a guest host on that show. So in the so called shownotes there is a link if you want to be considered to be a guest host The recording takes place on the fifth of June, click on the link in the show notes. Submit your details.
You'll have to be competent with a microphone competent with the camera.
No, surely none of
us are as good as that. Don't, don't, don't don't dispel the myth. Click on the link there, how we're going to choose who is going to be I don't know, we might just do it by random thing, but the link is in there. We want a fourth for the fifth of June. So please do
step up. We've already got double digit number of people who want to do it, just add yourself to list and somehow by fair means off our will pick will pick who that person is going to be given notice, and we'll walk you through I will walk you through the software. So you're not just coming in cold to record the episode.
10 people have already applied Nick.
They have Yeah. Wow. Wow. Yeah. Yeah.
Tell us who they are.
So we've got we've shared that I've shared the bucket with you. We've got enough standby people if if one of us is unavailable. Interesting. Yeah. I mean, it will. It will be
hotter and people have done it. Yeah.
Or if one of us gets fired by the end? Well, I've got
we've been shortlisted for an award. Somebody put in there. We've been shortlisted for a war talk about it, because I'm not going to. Who was it? Come on?
I think that was Alan.
I'll put it in. And we were aware of on the there's an organization in the UK called Next Gen Next Gen planners. Yeah. Which I think will answer your you active in it. You're a member of but this is
my membership.
I really think you would think so he's the oldest member of next gen planners. It's all about age and mindset. It's a mindset. It's not an age thing. Surprisingly, it's generally younger people. So surprisingly, we were shortlisted, they have an annual, I guess, a conference. And within the conference,
there's a range of awards. And much too, I think all our surprise, we saw that posted on Twitter and LinkedIn last week that we've been shortlisted, there's a number of other, which would appear to be very good podcasts for the financial planning profession. And we are in that little list. So if any of our listeners any of the trap is listening into this one, I don't know what the criteria is.
I don't know how they're gonna choose who the winner is, is it just a judging panel who decides what the best podcast is or what their specific decision criteria is, but if anyone's listening to this and want to give them a nudge, by all means, post something on social media, give us a shout out and give the judges something to think about because it would be quite nice to win, I must say. And, yeah, just
on that. Next Gen is an awesome organization, they're doing great work Am I being a member of and for years, I think I've been to every conference that they've had. So I'll be going to this conference. Again, it is my number one piece of advice to people just getting into this business that are a little bit sort of isolated or a little bit unsure who to speak to and what to do. So I recommend you join next gen cloud is immediately I think they've got like a free version,
the paid version. I'm on the paid version. I don't quite know what the difference is. But yeah, huge shout out to those guys and girls and nextgen that did some good work. Anyone else?
Excellent stuff. So in a similar kind of vein to getting some cue Dawson being awarded or being nominated for an award, we weren't we were mentioned by one of the top podcast people in the world. Actually, Steven Bartlett. Alan, I think I believe you you posted a tweet with a list of the rankings. And we sort of came in 15, with people like Steven Barlow show and Professor Scott Galloway and all the other luminaries and Steven Bartlett sort of picked up on your tweet.
What exactly I posted that because I never see it. I think all of us. were pleasantly surprised by the success of this podcast. And we do look stunned, shocked. But for this for the reloadvisor podcast to be listed. And there are as we know, there aren't there are charts. And I think the criteria for how you appear in charge is a bit of a mystery. No one really quite knows it's not just downloads is to do with reviews and feedback and and how long you're asked to the posting
and all that sort of stuff. But nevertheless, we find ourselves now, Nick, you and I were speaking about this recently in terms of the category, because this isn't really this isn't a personal finance podcast. Specifically. It's more designed for people who are in professional and people who've got financial planning businesses or aspirations to
have it. So we find ourselves yes, we're in the broad business category, but pretty much everyone is in and then but this sort of subset is entrepreneurship the entrepreneur category, which is which a lot of it the conversation is around. And that and in that category, I know there are things that literally 1000s and 1000s of podcasts that fit into that entrepreneur category. And yeah, I mean, I just happen to look at it maybe once a week and I most found we were number 15 in the UK.
Podcast charts under oath and yeah, and you're right so Stephen Bartlett's The Diary of a CEO. That's always number one. That is an it's a huge business. He's publishing a podcast At least twice a week, sometimes three times a week, but I listened to it the other day. He's got 30 full time staff three zero full time. So that's a real business. Just just on the podcast Darcy, you're 30 full time. So and then, you know, people like Professor Scott Galloway and Tim Ferriss,
and Alex are Mosy. We've mentioned this before you these are all the top top top podcasts in the world. They've got businesses that sit behind it, they are publishing two or three episodes per week. And ask jokers pitch up, you know, doing it ourselves one episode every two weeks, no budget, no absolute shambles. And you just to be on the same page as those guys that was is amazing, frankly. So I posted that on Twitter. I tag Steven Bartlett and he Yeah, he did he give us a
shout out. He just he replied said you know, well done. Congratulations. And he said, Just keep going because the the main success criteria for this is consistency. You just gotta keep going. So that was a nice little boost for us to remind ourselves. Just keep going. Thank you, Mr. Bartlett. Mr. Witter. Your hand
was raised. Yeah,
look to next gen. Thanks so much. That was a lovely surprise to Steven Bartlett's in turn for replying to Alan's tweet, right. That was also only the big thing for me was last week, I got we all got an email from the podcast hosts, people I forget even their names. Well, it's bro Yeah, that we have 25,000 downloads. So like, That, for me is the success, you know, we can go on any charts or anything like
that. But for me, that means is there are financial advisors out there in Ireland, the UK in the US, and probably South Africa and further afield, who are actually listening to this. Clearly, not everybody is going to agree with everything we say. We don't even agree with each other. But like, thank you so much to everybody who tunes in. And it is nice. There's no point in saying otherwise. It is nice for to bump into people who say Oh, I listened to the podcast and I thought that was great or
are I disagreed with that. It's just it's, it feels like we're having an impact. So thank you to everybody who has downloaded an episode so far. And please do keep doing so.
Indeed, indeed. Okay, that's lovely. Let's so that's enough. That's enough about us. Let's go on to the next thing on the on the topical titbits annual fees and cost disclosure again, Mr. Smith, I think that was put in by you. Yeah,
I'm just chucking this out just for general debate and discussion. I think often on in this podcast and then on topical titbits, we just share things that have happened to us and our businesses in recent days and weeks just to see if there's any other traction with anyone else. We're in the process of hopefully taking on a new sort of ideal fit,
prospective client. And we're just looking through it as a colleague of mine has shared this with me, and looking through all the information that they have been provided by their
existing advisor. And I'll I won't name the existing advisor, Don't think I don't think that anyone's interest to do so because I think this is kind of commonplace, but large national brand, they get a full detailed documented annual report, which is sort of similar, it's very, you know, nice and shiny and professional looking for similar to the sort of stuff that we do, and we're required to do for clients. But there is absolutely zero reference to fees and
charges disclosure. Now, my understanding of the regulatory regime in the UK is that you are compelled to give a full detailed breakdown of all fees and costs both in monetary terms and in pounds and pence, at least once a year to your clients. And what I've discovered since we had a look at this, and there's nothing and the client said this is all I've ever got, you know, this is everything I get from the my
existing advisor every year. And then that that sort of spurned a few other conversations, and it seems that the rules are being interpreted entirely differently. Because I tell you, we probably go too far, I think on reflection with our fees and disclosure documents. And every if there's ever a change, or a client asked for some income withdraws, or there's a small top up or anything at all, we go again and we we continue to sort of put fees and costs and charges and repeat ourselves
multiple times to clients. I'm not sure if it's of great value to clients. But the difference between that and having zero disclosure at all is quite marked. And I'm just wondering if anyone else's got any views or their own experiences? And what do you guys do? And also of the view from Ireland bear and he was What's your take on fees and charges disclosure on an annualized basis?
I think you're spending quite well. I think the platform the platform's have to do it. Anyway. So the bulk of my assets are on you know, a decent platform. And that's done. We disclose it You're right pounds and pence and every regulated piece of work that we do. I think overloading clients with fee information is detrimental because you know, one of our jobs is to remove their financial anxiety and not add to it. But zero disclosure at the same time is also not of use.
And even the disclosure we see is sometimes not full disclosure, I have seen D FM's have like a 28 page report and section nine is about fees. And honestly, it's blank, I go to section nine and it's blank. Or they might say we charge 1% plus VAT and levers that, again, it's just, it's a little bit
and you notice that what I have seen as well is sometimes they'll say, for fees and charges disclosure for full information, go to this website, or the one that I saw someone else posted this on Twitter last week, I think it was actually yet another big, big brand name, we said fullness number oh eight, five order that to get
details. And again, just the friction and the barriers that are in place, because who met how many people are gonna actually phone a number and get I don't even understand once they have, indeed that they get through. So it feels to me and I agree there is a balance, you should disclose your fees and
charges. But you but I think we've as I said gone too far as a colleague of mine said the other day, imagine that you got to full disclosure on owning a car right now, every every month or every quarter every year, you depreciate depreciation on your car, the petrol you put in everything, and this is all the cars you would never own a car, you'd say this is just so expensive. But you're right. But
there's a balance. It just seems to me that there are some organizations just kind of playing a little bit fast and loose with the rules and just doing as little as they can. Whilst the rest of us good guys are doing the right thing. And I must admit it just it doesn't augur Well, to me in terms of the consumer duty rules, which are about to be enacted in this country in July this year, I believe and I just think it's
gonna be more of the same. We'll be we'll be sort of belt and braces doing everything we're supposed to do and others will just kind of broadly ignore it. Call what are the what are the rules of it in Ireland in terms of ongoing fees and charges disclosure? Do you have to do it every year?
Do we have to do it every year? So it's in the statements island that they get from the provider? So the platform provider or whatever? Yes. So it is there. I think there's one massive difference though, at the outset. Which I didn't realize until we had this discussion offline last week, which was you guys need to say in pounds. And pence what this fee equals? Yep. And there are so many people hiding behind little, itsy bitsy, small percentages, right, trying to
get away with that. So I think that would that's a big, you know, massive, massive difference. It's grown and telling the client, you know, to half percent of your million quid as opposed to five grand and gone every year, we're gonna take five grand. So look, I think that is a big difference. But do we a little bit like what you said, Alan, if there's if there's kind of top ups or anything like that, we have to go again, right? And tell them
again? Yeah. But we have a, I suppose you've heard me say it a million times, right? We're trying to get ready here for RDR, which were bloody well open might bring in might be brought in at some stage. So we were aligned. And then also, they'll also see that I was deeply uncomfortable with the content of some who today's always to the Irish and versus UK cultural differences.
In case people think that I kind of think these things through at the end of Ireland's for a segment he said I'd be interested to get the view from across the sea in Ireland and I went, Oh, Jesus, I haven't listened to or it's been. So I had to listen very intently to what Andy replied. Thankfully, Alan then jumped in again and went okay, I know what they're talking about.
Well done. Thanks for paying attention call.
Yeah. So we've, we've we've we've a lot of work done on this are really have we've come from a very, very low bar, but I think we're coming good on it. And we just need to bring in RDR is the final piece for me. Yeah.
Nick, any comments?
I concur with that I did. It does seem that some brands just don't just Obfuscate. They'll just give clients everything but the hard costs. But you know what, I think that plays in our favor. Because if we're up, I know we are. And I know the Trappists will be if you're upfront and direct with the fees. And you're saying to a potential customer client, you're saying to a prospect, these are our fees in percentage terms, pounds and pence, this is what you get for it. I'm very happy to share that
with you. You know, you're inferring that it's a shame your existing advisor doesn't like it kind of it's just a way of separating you I think I think it can't, you know, in that sense, it's got it's got to augur well for the advisor that does come up from with the fees saying this is what we this is what we're going to charge this is what you're gonna get. And how do you feel about your existing advisor you're assisting DFM note never telling
you what the fees are. You don't know what you're paying them and we're quite happy to tell What we're paying. So now you can make a value judgment Mr. prospect, Mr. Prospect? And
I'm obviously Nick Murray trained and I do like the saying, you know, I charge percentages ad valorem, you know, I charge you 1% a year to help you avoid the mistakes, which cost multiples of 1% a year. And that is the reality of it. It's very hard to say that in monetary terms. But yeah, yeah, I still disclose both. But when I talk,
Murray uses a phrase, he says, we charge you a cent on the dollar, like or a penny in the pound. Yeah, sounds sounds very nice, actually sounds
very slice and dice it. But then I do the grand total. So the platform's charging you point 2.3, the fund manager is charging you point three, I'm charging you whatever the grand total is, whatever, I know, I can put that into a monetary terms that they can work out themselves. But I'm also Okay, with it being mentioned in percentages. Yes, we need to ram it down their throat about 14 different places
every single year. Where do we get where are we getting when they're sending them a video screaming at them a monetary number? And they've got a sort of, they've got to say, Yes, I proceed. They got a they got they got to consent. Here's a loom video 1004 to 75 quid this year. Are you okay to proceed next year?
Think channeling my inner Andy, I've got quite a good fees page on my website. And I have I think I put quite a bit of time into doing and I break it down, you know, so that, as Andy mentioned, there are three elements. There's my fee, there's the platform fee, there's the investment fee,
three elements. And typically, if you invested X amount, it will be this and people can see it, you know, it's just you don't have you know, so yes, and I'm one of those advisors who does put their fees on their website, but I don't make a big song and dance about it. But it's there for people if they want to look doesn't make me better than anybody else doesn't make me worse than anybody else. Right? I think we've done that
sufficient justice. So two episodes ago, Episode 17, I spoke about how the UK stock market as in terms of capitalization in global terms is just shrinking and shrinking and shrinking. It was double digits 20 years ago, that was 12% of the market. Well, market
cap. It's now just about 4%. And this week, I saw a tweet from a respected financial journalist, one of the better financial journalists, Marin, Somerset web, and she was tweeting about a UK tech firm, I can't remember the name of it, sorry, but it's decided to go and list in the
USA rather than list here. And Somerset Webb said, Imagine you had a firm to list, you can do it in the UK, get half the price on listing, get half the CEO salary, spend most of your time talking to compliance, and then get chucked off your own board after nine years. Or you can list in the US we need reform now. So there's obviously a problem with entrepreneurship in this country, and a complete disregard for the private sector
and business. And it's starting now to impact it's really starting to impact then in the comments from you guys. So you got something to add, we can move on to the next thing. Okey, dokey. And what else? Yes, just just add, I think I saw a good website and American website. It's the kindness financial planning run by a guy called Elliot apple. And he's a virtual
financial planner. So for those of us who are moving to a virtual world or near virtual world, he's got this great website, they'll be linked to it in the so called show notes. Just just talking, it's client facing. So why you should use a virtual financial plan and why you shouldn't and how I work and of course, being American there, they stand to the nth degree
very slick. So if you're thinking about doing that, and being able to communicate the merits, and the disadvantages of being a virtual financial planner to your target audience, is just you have a look at his website, and there's nothing new under the sun. Take some ideas from that. Now. Oh, Andy, Andy, you've had even a love fest happening in the last few days go on Berkshire Hathaway. Let's do it.
He loves it. Yeah. So this is the Warren Buffett Warren Buffett's Annual General Meeting in Omaha, Nebraska. It was live streamed on the sixth of May a good friend of mine, Jimmy Joseph went out there. So he sent me some photos whilst it was there. I've put it in the topical tip bits, but it's sort of culture corner. I watch this every year. It's about six hours long. There's a morning session and afternoon session. And I've also in the show notes, but the link to the annual general
meetings going back to 1994. And I have listened to all of them. And they're about six hours long each one of them. So if you're as sad as me, I want to overload on the Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger, I do recommend checking out this podcast feed that is absolutely awesome. My next topical tip bit is just gone from that.
Did you say Jimmy? Jason went out there for it? YEAH. Jimmy
Joseph went out there. Yeah, he's he was in for that just
isn't I thought you had to be a shareholder.
There's a story about that island. Yes, you you have to be a shareholder. And I think at the moment the A Class shares are 400,000 each. Yeah, I've not given away Jimmy George's net worth because if you're a B class shareholder now, which is I think 1/20 of that. You also have a ticket to the AGM. I think he was going prior to COVID. And this has been nudged on since then. I think they're bad. Two or three virtual meetings. And then he's gone out there, and he's bringing me back
some See's Candy. If anyone knows anything about Buffett, I'm very excited to be in that.
You might I've watched I watched about, I watched about an hour and a half of it the weekend when it was on, and the overriding thing for me is you've got Buffett is what 92 and mangoes 99. And they were sharp as attack both of them both bridges. It's just you know, but there's such a brilliant double act, the funny
bounce off each other. And he said something at the beginning doesn't because obviously it wasn't a day of putting a title again is of the Royal the coronation King Charles and yet Buffett says we have our own King Charles here. Look at Charles Munger, Charlie Munger got the audience laughing along
Yeah, he's but he's basically like, apparently we've got an event clash going on in the UK? Yeah, a bit of an event clash? I mean, they've never mentioned any other event apart from that, which is quite interesting. Yeah. I've listened to the whole morning session three hours, and I'll be going through the afternoon session. Mainly it's questions from the audience. And the question is getting better and better every year? They asked him, they were asking them this year about AI.
That was quite interesting. And a couple of other things. But yeah, going back to the whole sort of back catalogue to 1994, and a podcast. Feed is absolutely brilliant. And you go through all the different stages, like the tech crisis, the financial crisis, and then a COVID. All the other things that we've gone through. Yeah, absolutely brilliant, superb. So yeah, do check out certainly the latest one and then also, if you like them, check out the back catalogue, a couple of other
quicker updates. The hum conferences are selling well, South Africa, huge chunk have gone I think we've got about another 100 left tickets, so please do buy one there. We've got Bruce Whitfield, who's a big speaker in the in South Africa, and we've got our very own Alan Smith making the trip out to Cape Town, leaving Paddington to go on a good show. In Kilburn south
of Cuba.
Could you tell me what I should talk about? That will be good, but yeah, we'll we'll get on
to that. And but and then London is selling in London is selling selling incredibly well. I've got 300 tickets to sell and I'm pretty much at about 260 the headline speakers there are Rory Sutherland and my good friend Simon Buckner is the UK public speaking champion. So he'll be doing a good show and then find another thing topical tip bit. I went to Lisbon last weekend. Lisbon is now pretty much my favorite European city. Rome is a close second. But
yeah, Lisbon is fantastic. And I'm going to be going to Porto as my next European trip, which I've heard is potentially better than the Lisbon which I'll, I'll be the judge. That's it really.
Back to you boss. Great stuff. Thanks, guys. So we're 2018 29 minutes into this rambling disaster. So I think it's time that we we consider moving on to the meat and potatoes and those are potatoes being peeled in the background. I know this causes some consternation for some the trap pack and the meat of potatoes. Mr. Smith, let's let's hand over
to you on the water. By the way this if we go on for a long time TRAPPIST with this, we might split this over two episodes or so because this is a big subject, essentially, the client journey, Mr. Smith?
Yeah, thank you, Nick. We've been we've got a project on in our firm at the moment, which is causing me to you know, to focus and sort of relook at some of the things that we do because the world has changed significantly since we
started. So started the business, every business whether it knows it or not, whether it's kind of thought through or whether it just happens by accident has a you know, a new client process, whatever we you want to describe it, how you engage with a potential client when they first make contact with you. You have a meeting or a series of meetings and we're all doing a variation on the
theme. I don't think anyone is doing anything dramatically different but I'd like to and it's a kind of a follow up to some degree on the conversation that we had last episode, which was a focus on critical non essentials. I'm really trying to get into the weeds somewhat and hopefully offering some insights and thoughts and some experience to the listeners about a good
kind of new client. I don't like the word there's no there's no better word but onboarding, onboarding new clients, how you take new prospective clients through your journey, how you work out whether they are a good fit or not. How you politely disengage if the answer good fit and how you take clients on so some years ago, I went I'll tell you just a brief a brief story which will take you back sorry, Andy, we're gonna say something before we go through to this No, put your hand up
grab yourself a drink, a very long drink. It's story time with Ellen Smith. If
I couldn't have teed you up any better come on. I, I've always been interested. I've always been curious about what I perceive to be best practice. What are the better and the best firms who do what we do in the UK and around the world? What are they doing? What can we learn from I think that's one of the reasons that we're all most of us are fans or followers of Nick Murray, Nick Murray seems to kind of show best practices and good examples
of how to do good things. And in that vein, in 2000, late 2008, nine, around that time, I was I came across a firm, I think I've mentioned them before one of the previous episodes, but there's a there was a firm called CEG worldwide in the US, who are offering coaching consulting courses, what I'm what they refer to as being for the elite financial advisors, elite Wealth
Advisors of the world. And the backstory of this, the founder of this organizations guy called John Bowen, who himself was a was historically was a financial planner, and, you know, started off relatively humbly and then grew his business and grew his business and grew the firm. And he was in the West Coast of America, he was based in sort of Northern California, he merged
with a firm in Los Angeles. And he disclosed and it's all public information, he's happy to share it, he's disclosed that their clients included Tom Cruise, Oprah Winfrey, David Letterman, some of this, some of the biggest, you know, American football stars, basic basketball stars, all that sort of stuff. And he said, We got to a point where a minimum entry level to
be a client was $25 million. So I thought, I'm gonna listen to this guy, if he knows how to grow a business like that he must know what he's talking about. Because he sold eventually sold his practice, sold his business, obviously hadn't more money than he could count or it ever needed and created this consulting coaching business called CG worldwide.
And I got to the point where I was going to travel out, they had this wet ran for a year, you go for a quarterly meeting in San Diego, I think it was I was all ready to go buy my ticket and travel out there once a quarter to learn from these people. And lo and behold, through a partnership, they had agreed with dimensional fund advisors, they came to the UK. And would they ran the what would be a one year program, they ran it for a week. So five
days pretty intensive. And as a number of people that are there are still in our financial planning community. Today that we're on, we're on that same course, I believe it's the only time they ever came to the UK. And it was very profound. And it was very kind of life changing and business changing for my company, because we adopted so many of the practices that went on that they shared with because they said this is how this is what the best firms in the world
do. So I'm a big believer in replicating, finding best practice and just copying it rather than trying to invent it myself. So in terms of your when you first meet with a client, assuming that they meet your criteria, and you go into what they call what is generically known as a discovery meeting. So this became quite interesting, because they said this was the key to everything. So they created they have a 62 question,
discovery meeting process. And I'm sure that your nick is probably looking at eyes rolling right now, I don't know. But they, they effectively gave us a script. And we just started doing it. And it was quite different. And maybe a lot of these, these things are adopted. Now, but I think a lot of this, most people still don't go through this. But they they start a question, they start talking about the seven key subjects they talk about. Right.
So the opening, this is the first meeting that we always aim for, if it's a couple partners, you know, husband and wife, partners, spouses, and they would always do things that very specifically identify who is the least financially dominant partner. So you ask who takes care of the family finances? Usually, not always, usually it's the man. So the return to the least dominant, so be the woman in this case. And they'll start asking questions, and they start asking about what the core
values questions. And they do ask questions like, what was money like growing up in your childhood? You know, what does money mean to you? And they say things like, Tell me your story. Tell me Tell me now. And then they go through a whole range of questions across seven key subjects, as I say 62 different questions. Some of the questions, frankly, were bizarre, and we didn't adopt all of them. I mean, they, for example, they say, Do you have any pets? They want to know do
you have any pets? You want to know the one of the questions because they would also be potentially exempt transfers. No, I mean goldfish, horses, dogs, cats. But they said there's an impact because some people if you had in some of this sort of very high net worth people had horses and stables of horses or some people theater, the dog was the part of the family so it was all quite rare.
It was really kind of out there and very kind of California for a bit and so we We had to apply our own credit, almost sort of UK a fire to some extent. But as a result of you go through this, and the meetings would take two and a half to three hours, very pretty, you know, quite intensive, we'd record the meeting. And you come away with that with what they called a total clients profile, which is
effectively a mind map. And if you can get the client's entire life on one page, across their values, their goals, their important relationships, their interests, their hobbies, and it's not until you're probably an hour into the conversation, you're even talking about money. I thought that was quite interesting. And you know what, so we ran that for many years, really successful. People liked
it. And I've just realized, like a lot of things in life, we probably we stopped doing it to the same degree, it was so successful that we stopped doing it. Yeah. And that's one of the processes we use. So we've got a bit of a refresh going on right now. Does it still make sense? Should we go back to it should be freshen this up a bit, because I think we just diluted it, we've gone. We've kind of short circuited a little bit.
But that's, that was quite a dramatic change to anything that we were doing before that which was more traditional IFA factfinding, which went straight into, you know, assets, liabilities, income expenditure, this was a much higher level and as much long, much more long winded, I suppose. But it didn't have good engagement with the right prospects and right clients. So throw that out to anyone who'd like to comment in terms of that first kind of discovery fact fun, wherever you
want to call it meeting? Who's got any thoughts like to share in that?
I'll jump in. That was. Yeah, it really interesting stuff, Alan, and I look to know what the last bit you just said there that you had something that was really working, and then the businesses kind of maybe slacked off. And and that's, that's just human nature, isn't it? That we're all guilty of doing that. And I think that's the beautiful time to do a review to go back and say, Okay, we're not doing that the way we used to do it. We do
it different differently. And I'm not sure I've ever done a discovery meeting that went over, say, an hour and a half. So clearly, there's an awful lot more depth in what you're, you're talking about doing. But then again, do I think that we don't have good profiles in our heads on good relationships built up with our clients after the initial discovery piece? I think we do. Right? So I'm not sure we need to extend it any
more. Where we've come to Ireland on this is we've done a, we've a getting to know you questionnaire, which is basically like you're all fat find. But we've developed that it's an online version. When you click It's a hidden page and are on our website. So we send that out to anybody who's looking to get a financial plan starts off with a letter for me or message for me as to here's, you know, we do it differently. And we're going to answer the answer the questions like Are you going to
be okay? And we're going to try and deliver a plan whereby it's designed around your goals, dreams and aspirations, etc. And then we go through it. So we start off with some of the software questions, you know, your first memories of money, that kind of stuff. And then we get into tell us about your assets and liabilities we do. There's no point. So in other words, and then we try and finish with some of the software
questions now. I think if the some of the softer stuff at the end are really, really insightful for us. One question, if, in 12 months, time you were to review this relationship, what would success look like? And then in three years time, same question. What's your experience of financial advisors before? So you're getting an insight into, you know, what their expectations are, and what their experiences are already.
And, you know, I saw something on Twitter recently from the our American, thin twit friends about, you know, Oh, you don't really ask people about their goals. Do you? That's so tweet. And that's so you know what we do? Right? Because we need to know, like, I'm not embarrassed ever to say I, we have three words, right? So three words that we drive home. And I always say to the guys, if you're not using these three words several times in the initial couple of meetings, it's a fail, goals,
dreams, aspirations. Keep using them, keep using them, keep using them so that the clients you know, will feel that this is different now. I had I did one on last Friday in our Dublin office with Simon Ross or financial planner in Dublin. And we opened the meeting to try and give the client a sense of this is going to be different with what's the video Andrew, you did it first. It's absolutely made Think your life Life is a journey or something like that. And it's about living your best
life. So I said, Look, were different than what you've ever experienced, this meeting is going to be different. It's going to be around your goals, dreams and aspirations to set the tone of that, can we watch a video together? I think it's two and a half minutes. I love it. I've told you all so many times, I love it. It's a It's sorts to try and you know, get away from the private bank, you're coming in here to feel stupid to be afraid to ask questions, all of that kind of stuff. It's how can
we change the tone entirely? So that's how we do it.
Can I Can I just just come back on that and share an experience that we learned? Because, you know, we so we adopted the CG thing and and just went straight into it. And and it worked out because that, you know, you asked their advice. And because it because it was so dramatically different to open conversations with. Tell me about your background, tell me about what was your family life growing up? It was all it was, it was yeah, it was significant different to what we've done before. And their
view was just do it. Don't mess around. Don't try to do a watered down version of it. Just go straight into it. And you'll you'll learn from your feedback, and you'll change it. And we had to change, you know, because we were having I remember one of it was like one dark, wintry Monday morning, early, early Monday morning. And this guy, a very successful entrepreneur, and he just wanted to come in and he just wanted to review his finances. And he there was no, there's no setting. We hadn't
set it up in any way. And I remember sitting I just thought it was a carry on. I sat down with this guy. And I just said tell me what was money like growing up and even what you want to borrow? I said what is what is what what does money mean to you? What you and he was just really incredulous. He thought wonder what the hell,
Ireland worse than that is if you were like me started off as a as the product seller. I do. Yeah. Pension. Right. And then And then John is still a client of mine. Right? Not sure if John. But John tells the story overview points. And then one day current arrived in and said, Hey, John, what are your goals? Seriously gone wrong.
Call if you've been in a course as I told you about
that, or have you hit your head? Yeah. And it's
funny story about that. I was doing a training session last week. And there was a girl in the audience, a lady in the audience, and she's the daughter of a successful financial advisor has been in the business for 30 years. And she was saying her father started off, you know, insurance salesman knocking on doors, and he's gone through every iteration from sort of like Carl's story, like a lot of people story. And now he's a pure financial planner uses boy
and all that sort of stuff. When he calls his clients that he's had for like, 40 years and rings up, usually the wife picks up the phone, and then she she shouts that the husband, oh, it's blah, blah, blah, the insurance salesman. Although it was funny, like now he's like, a lifestyle, financial planner. Like, how could you possibly call it the insurance salesman? So that was the first thing
if you guys considered reviewed, you know, what I refer to as the George Kinder questions. Three. Yeah,
we have some of them in there. But like, the likes, I think, one of those questions. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, I don't. But is one of them like, you know, what would you do if you're going to die in three months? Yeah.
2010. Like one year left, totally frozen. They aren't. They are quite powerful questions. I mean, I've been through the Kinder process
irrelevant when you're trying to get to a live view, that is irrelevant. When you're trying to build a long term partnership with people. However, you know, if money was no issue, what would you do differently today? Now, I like that question. Right. So, you know, what should we be looking at? Are there things there are too many people who have bucket lists, right? I actually couldn't because I knew we were going to talk about this. So so we have this in our reception,
right? It's just a bucket list book. Right? And we're not expecting anyone to read it. We're just trying to set the tone of what happens in our office and too many people have these bucket list items of the never get around to and all that right? So are the stuff we can identify early on. Why Why aren't we doing that you have loads of money in the bank wire to do not just go and do so.
Yeah, but there's I think when you mentioned before the you know the Twitter debate about about goals and shouldn't bother with that. I think it is nuanced because I think it can be quite a challenge use pluck anyone off the street is there. As we all know, those first meetings are I've you know, I'm thinking about retirement, I need to review of my pension and all that sort of stuff. And you talk about what are your goals? I think isn't immediately difficult question to answer to
answer. It's too vague to say but what do you mean you mean goals today, tomorrow this week? The rest of my life? I don't know. I think it's quite in my experience. It's quite common people say, I don't really know. Yeah, boy, sort of push a bucket list. Do you want to go and visit the Taj Mahal or so No, whatever,
I suppose I suppose experience leads you to, you know, find ways around that. So the way I would do it is ask people about their family. So who's at home? Who's who, you know, the important people. And now we start talking about I don't like sit down there like a little bit, you know? What are your goals? Like, that's never going to work? It's it's big, bring them on a journey nice and
softly with you. And you will you will, they'll start it will become apparent, as opposed to actually having to ask the questions. Right, I
got a question for you then on that, and this is where again, we've maybe struggled a bit and could do this better. So if someone then articulates something, which is a, you know, a maybe a long term goal or something they'd like to do or achieve within their life? How is that documented, captured? And then how would you hold them accountable? Later on? Again, full, full sort of confession? I think sometimes we've let some of them slip. Yeah, we've recorded them at the
time. But do we have a sort of a,
like, we put it in as an event into the cash flow plan. Alright, so and then you can move
the I was gonna say, once, once voting gets introduced into the mix, that's really become a little more a little bit more future focused. But at first, we're planning decades ahead. And clients are just struggling to work out what they're doing at the weekend. You know, that's the sort of joke and then we rock up and say, you know, what we're gonna
place on it. I think the the following years that they go through the same process back to Carl says to sort of setting the tone, they then become more future focused, the longer they work with you. That's what I've generally found that and they become more engaged in the whole process over Tzedek.
Yeah, because client goals typically have money involved, there's a cost to them. So they will be in the financial plan, and they will be on the timeline. And if the event is five years down the line, after they've been working with you for four years, you sit down with a plan. So next year, you know, are we still doing
this? Because we put money aside for it this, whatever it is this, you know, cliche thing, this fantastic one off holiday to the Taj Mahal or whatever it was that we talked about five years ago? Well, it's coming up now. So you know, how do you find the booking process? Well, we haven't done it yet. Nick, we're going to come Okay. Well,
the money's there. Right. So I think it will, it should come up organically as part of the annual planning meeting process, because it's in their financial planners, as a cost is now going and we're here to make sure that the money is there for those things when it's needed. That's really our role. Just look at the question side of things. I'm not i Yes, my discovery meetings are normally 15 seconds. Now it's virtual, I can just
disengage them. I mean, I, yes, I use a three year question, you know, for it to be a success, what it really three years hence, what does success look like? Look like? I think that's it. That is a good question. I try and avoid the tree hugging stuff. And I think there's, there's maybe it's a cynical side of me, I think there's an awful lot of money's been spent on that kind of stuff. And I'm not sure it's totally appropriate. And maybe that's an American English, psychological
difference. And the other two questions I do ask them the three year question. The other question, and Carl mentioned this one is, have you used a financial advisor before? And what was the experience and listen really carefully to that, whether it's negative or positive? Because if they say it's true, if you say it, it's conjecture, but if the client
says it, it's true. So so when you're following up that meeting with them, you say, Okay, well, if they had if they had a negative experience with an advisor, because of X, Y, Zed reasons, you in your follow up email to the client, or what have you, or your loom, you say, and by the way, we take a lot of time and effort to make sure that we do this, this and this the exact opposite of their
experience. And the third question I asked my clients who referred so I will say to prospects, listen, you've come to me from from Lucien Graham, tell me in your words, what Lucien Graham said, I've done for them. And then they'll they'll they'll tell you talk about the graphs, and it's sort of financial planning and cash flow, and you kind of sorted them out and put them on the
straight and narrow. And again, because they're saying it, it carries a lot more resonance than if I say, I'm going to do a cash flow graph, we're on the straight and narrow, which should just go you know, over the heads in one ear and out the other.
So but just just just clarify, because I think it sounds like all you guys do it pre you send a link to a sort of pre meeting form for your prospective clients who complete online. And I know you've got a good version of that on your way. I've
home this over the year. So yeah, there's some boring information at first and the questions I asked her in this order. How did you hear about us? Did someone recommend us? How can we help open? It's just very open question. The next one is, what is your main financial concern at the moment? That's an important one. Next up, have you worked with a financial advisor before? If so, how did that go? Another incredibly important one, what are you looking for in a financial advisor? And the next
two questions? The next question is quite important. Do you currently have a written pounds specific financial life plan? We know the answer to that is going to be no. Some of them say yeah, I've hobbled something together on Excel but yeah, not not not to detail. And then I put what your hobbies, interests or passions again, just to get an idea for them. I then asked them a sort of financial planning question again so that I'm preparing them for what we're
going to be doing. If you were to retire next month, approximately how much monthly income would you require to maintain a dignified and comfortable retirement? Assume your mortgage is cleared. Again, I'm wanting to or wanting to get a grasp of, you know, 2000 pounds a month, 1000 pounds a month, 10,000 pounds a month or something like that. And then ask them a couple of questions about where they live. I've got a disqualifier question actually, on my discovery form.
And this is what it is, how many personal finance slash investment books have you read? None, one or two plus? Two plus is a huge red flag for me. So, yeah. Why? Because often, it just is going to cause some problems in the relationship potentially, from my experience.
They might have opinions and thoughts of their own and we couldn't.
It's going often it's going to cause problems in the relationship, potentially, so often, and potentially means there's isn't really a disqualifier. It's just like, if
so yeah, I'm really keen on that discovery form being filled in and I won't have an initial meeting with the client and so filled that in that's their first test of how engaged are they involved in this?
That's really important. Andy, were the same. You don't fill it in? Yeah. And getting a meeting? Yeah,
exactly. So very rarely do I have to send an email like the day before, like, please make sure you fill this in, and we're not on the call tomorrow.
So yeah, people are quite, how long would you estimate it takes someone to complete that very quick,
Alan, I'll send a link to you, you know, sort of what, like 10 minutes, less than that five lists. And it's beautiful. It's scrollable. It works on iPad. And you know,
that's because I've seen I've seen, I've heard of others. I mean, a guy, another friend of mine told me a story about trying to engage with a well known financial advisor. And he was sent effectively, quite a complex spreadsheet, and asked to complete all the details. And he just didn't even know how to do it. So we're trying to
minimize the friction, but there's exactly amount there's a healthy amount of friction in the relationship. And the final point, I'm going to say about the questions. Yeah, I've got the CG questions. I've seen them. I've seen the sort of seven sections that they're quite useful. If you're going to use questions in a meeting, I mean, it's easy on Zoom. But if you're ever going to use it a meeting, I can't remember what consultants said this to me, but was quite useful. He prints it out and has
it on the table. And he says, or he or she says the adviser says I'll just say no, I've just got a list of interesting questions here. Like you just call it out. I've got a list of interesting questions here rather than just trying to pretend it's all natural. Okay, yeah, that's good. So yeah, your relationship with money, no siblings like looking. It's just, it will just look very unauthentic. So yeah, just just call it out and say I've got list of interesting questions. Yeah.
Yeah, I'm not gonna answer I'm not gonna ask all of them which the other thing?
Yeah, yeah. Cuz they look at it and go Jesus Christ. You got 68 questions there, mate. Like Allah. We got, you know, I've only got my lunchtime. Yeah. So. So just calling it out. Is is quite useful.
Chairman had some input there about 15 minutes. Go ahead, Nick.
No, no, I just want to say thanks. Thanks, Carl, for that particularly loud cough. That was,
which I apologize for.
But I'm still would have dumped you. And I have a similar process to Mr. Hart. I don't have a superbly engineered website. Page. But I sent I sent prospects a Word document, it's two pages. On one page, I just asked for high level financial just so I got an idea where they are, I don't want to know who their pension providers are, what funds are going, I want to know roughly what assets they've got, what debts they've got, what mortgage, you know, because some people are going to look at that
thing. Shit, I can't do anything but these people. So that's just the end of the day. And the second page is the more questions are there the open questions? Why do you make contact with me? What are your concerns? Do you have any high level aspirations and people generally will open up with that because although and I get that, but I don't book in the discovery meeting until it comes back. So I'm not chasing them
ever. The day before the meeting, the meeting does not I say to them, I'll send this out to you get it back to me when it's back to me, then we'll do
the discovery meeting. And because I've got that high level financial information, I can then do you know Armisen bucket, I've got enough to do a personalized bucket based on that Word document for them, which I either draw on the board behind me or I've got a Google Slides and PowerPoint style presentation, which I'll do for them as well but because that information is come back to me I could do a bucket that is about them, you know, there's no point me doing a bucket with bite and
let's on the outside of the bucket if they've got both, let's say but if they got a limited company, you do that you do the factory icon or what have you. And that's how I do it. And I would say it probably takes people about 1015 minutes to fill out the Word document. You know, it's it's, but I think I get and I mean, I love I love having hidden pages on my website if I want really detailed information on certain things, you know, and I do use
that. But I think the word documents just kind of open you know, they can just find you around with this as they want as long as they get some if idea who they are before we actually believe we had the first proper meeting with them. That's That's my process.
What we always do as well is, are what we have as part of the getting to know you form the online questionnaire is we have the first two parts of our compliance journey as well in there. So our terms of business documented, they have to tick a box to say that they've read it. And then we are mumbo jumbo questionnaire next, our risk profile questionnaires are in there as well. And we tend to almost always get those
done at first hit. So it's a nice way of kind of just getting taken care of some initial stuff at the outset. Yeah, that's, that's,
that's interesting, because I'm totally polar opposite to that. And I give the terms of business, whatever, we have to call it the client agreement, I give it out at the last possible legal moment, because I don't, you know, because that I might not be working with them. Well, they might have already they might have been me off, I might have
been them off by that stage. And I don't the risk assessment questionnaire comes right at the end, because they have to have a bit of a bullying session for me where we talk about risk. And what were the real risk is, you know, I think, if it gives you a public receptive question that they're going to answer it the way they think you want to, you know, they only get the answer they think you want to see, not the answer they need to be giving. So I that's interesting
next to you, you have a conversation about about risk versus volatility, and the biggest risk being running out of money, and all that sort of thing. Let's reposition it or you, or you educate them, but let's say you educate them, or you ask them to fill this.
Yeah, I do the bucket and I say thanks. You know, you told me, you know, we think your lifestyle cost is 50k a year, you told me you want to be financially independent at this age, chances are wannabes gonna live for three plus decades, that lifestyle cost that that stuff that's in your bucket, that's gonna last you for three plus decades, and the chances are, the cost of your
lifestyle is gonna triple. So we're all we're trying to do when we do financial planning for people, like good folks like you, is to minimize the chance of you running out of money before you run out of life. Because that's the biggest risk and and how we're going to get you through this. financially secure within that with a dignified independent retirement is by giving you chock full portfolio is chock full of the great companies of the world.
Now, that's going to be countercultural, you weren't here and blah, blah, blah, you know, you know, the lines, and then we go off that, and then if people then start just to say, Well, I still don't want to go down that I don't want that, you know, then okay, well, then we probably can't work together. And you know, and I haven't given them a successful questionnaire, I haven't given them a compliance thing as yet. We haven't done any regulator device, so they've just disqualified themselves.
Yeah, well, I do like that. Just to go back to the terms of business for a second and back to something that Alan said to me years ago, to use the compliance as a, as a positive as a USP. So on our website, you can, if you go all the way down the bottom, you'll see terms of business, and we call it doing business. But also that's our terms of business, we put loads of effort into that do things the best one in the market have set up for as well.
So it's kind of because it's a kind of a cool document that hopefully sets us apart. That's why we introduced it at the outset, the mumbo jumbo questionnaire, I just haven't found a good place to do that. And the client journey, we just got it done early as kind of a review on that.
Just to do the mumbo jumbo questionnaire at the outset, and it comes back God forbid I could feel Andy seething internally, this, I know your hand was raised, and it will come back to you. And they come back as a four out of 10 on the risk scale, and you're
doing the cash flow. And it's painfully obvious that they if that if you put them into the normal shit, actually really high risk to their financial health, four out of 10 portfolio, they're going to run out of money, then you then you have the conversation and you would
So honestly, so our scores are out of seven, and 90%, or either four or five, we've Andy alluded to it in the last couple of episodes about, like 100% equity funds coming in a four out of seven at the moment, and all that kind of stuff. So so you can kind of you know, you're gonna match stuff. So for us, it's like, does the recommendation match the financial plan? Is the client comfortable that these are long term blah, blah? Can we can we match all of that around?
Honestly, Nick, we don't we have probably pre qualifiers in our on our website. So we tend to get more high net worth people than not. So it tends not to be a big issue. That's not to say, have we had a couple of issues? Of course we have. We just talked to the clients.
And your hand was raised, might you stick with me?
Yeah, just to follow up, you know, close off my process, it's contact me somehow. Email, WhatsApp, something, I'll then send them my discovery form. They'll complete it. I'll then have the initial phone call. Usually, after that, I'll send them a link that explains my fees and service. I send them another link that explains my investments, the Maven invest portfolios. Then we have the strategy meeting where I build their financial Master Plan live
with them. So at that point, we've gone through the discovery, initial phone call, sort of question, sort of a meeting. They've got an idea about the fees, charges structure and process. They've got an idea about the investment portfolios that I manage as well. And then obviously, the strategy meeting is building their financial plan. And then after that we do all the compliance regulation to get them on boarded as a new client.
A little bit of a story about that I'm taking on a client at the moment that just got one investment company involved, I thought this was gonna be a walk in the park, they completed my fact find with their address as they put an extra new digit in the address. So basically, we copied that and put a letter of authority together to this new new investment company trying to get the information back from
them. Client and then also the client said, Oh, by the way, my email address linked to that investment company is not the email address using at the moment. So the DocuSign needs to go to the wrong the other email address fine. So I went to another email address came back as an extra digit and we sent it off to the provider two weeks later, they said this is wrong, and they highlighted the
addresses wrong. I went onto Royal Mail found the address found the extra digit, I thought sugar, this is a mistake I've done. Then I went to the back find that they filled in and they put an extra it's just it's just a it's just an a complete enough faff. So you've got to get the right email address right for DocuSign linked to the certain company that's involved. You got to obviously get the
address right. That's like, ridiculous, but it was two digits but you put in three digits was very hard to spot.
Do you Alan? Never.
So my assistant. even notice.
You lost me. I drifted off five minutes ago. Right.
Okay, anyway, can we can we can we do?
Like a life? Like the kind of thing that I mean, you know, it's just to go on living when he goes with that kind of experience? You know? Yeah,
I don't know. Anyway, I'm hanging in there. We're trying to get it sorted. Financial Advisors listening to this will get what I'm saying, you know, the wrong email addresses linked to the DocuSign certificate. And it's just like Jesus Christ is meant to be easy and 2023.
Anyway, we play it. Mr. Mr. Chairman, I was just thinking because Andy then started talking about what he refers to as his strategy meeting, which I think is the version that we call our our blueprint meeting. In the interest of time, is that the one to carry forward for the next session? I just begin to see that
said, I think that's one of your better ideas. Yes, let's do that. By the way, just for the deer trappers listening in the in the cough, Darby. It's now heart one with your one. Thank you for that last interjection. Andy. That was good. Yeah, let's do let's let's read there is a mute,
muted and unmuted at the right time obviously didn't and I don't know if I'm delayed.
Did you on a letter of authority isn't it it can be done. So let's do that. Let's wrap up the discovery section of the client journey and in the next episode would show you if my math is telling me it should be episode 20. We'll move on to the the strategy meeting where we want to call it the first planning meeting how we do it because I think that's a really good point
because we talk about this. But a lot of when I've talked to other advisors, they that what they want knows how just you run your meet your planning meetings, what goes on. So if we focus on the first strategy meeting, how we set it out, what we do beforehand, the parameters, the messages, we're trying to get across to the client throughout that initial meeting, and yes, we could talk a bit about the tech but I mean, that's not really Yeah, okay,
let's do that. So, if we're happy with that, gents, I think it's time for us to consider moving on to the next part of the show and it's always there on time. There is posting hauling the bulging sack of practice questions. Trappist if you want to post a question to the real advisor podcast, please do so in the pinned tweet,
there's a link. There's also a link in the show notes and open up a Google Form put your question in there we are going through them as much as we can but loads to catch up on we really do appreciate your input. It's your show and you shape it as much as we do. So let's have a look at the questions we've got here. Who's this? Okay, this is from someone called Tom RS not on Twitter. Having trained with a restricted advice firm, what advice would you give someone who wanted to set up on
their own? A one man independent advice firm? Do you think it's necessary to get experience within an independent firm? First I'll have a quick stab at that that's okay you guys because one of the meat and potatoes subjects that wasn't discussed today, but was this thing about tired versus independent? So I would just go back to first principles Tom are and question whether you need to go independent. It's easy to say so I suppose because I'm not
gonna do it. But if I was starting out again today, I might well look at the restricted model. The only thing wrong with the restricted model is the horrible word restricted. It's a terrible adjective if they call it focused. It'd be independent or focus that sounds far more restricted is awful. But most of most real financial advisors in my experience Tom are restricted. Then their trade, appellation might say independent financial adviser, but they're all restricted.
They'll the real financial advisors will use one or two platforms. They'll have one or two Investment Partners. they'll have a process that all clients go through to get each unique client to their financial, financial salvation. But it's this throwback to the days when we were product brokers. And I think the regulator's still viewed us as product, you know all the regulations about the product all the time, isn't it? And that's why they put a lot of
a lot of heat on it. So I would say if you're going out on your own fine. There's no difference between independent and restricted, you might have to do some more compliance stuff as an independent friend. But I would just go back to first principles, as I said, just that, you know, what do I need to be independent, if it's that more, but that much more
burdensome? And there are more compliance regulations being independent, then just think you know what, just think about going restricted, because most most of us are in reality. Okay, guys, but
I'm going to Nick, I'm going to push back on that. Because because of how you've described it restricted is restricted. If I was, in Europe, most of us, we do a whole market review. And we identify the best platforms or investment solutions, and we tend to stick to those. But we are required to periodically review those. Every now and again, in my experience, we come across a client with a bag of spanners, as we call it loads of kind of legacy
investments. And if I'm restricted, I can't give any advice on those whether to keep them, shut them do anything else.
Yeah, that's the bit. That's that's the bit I don't know how it was. for me.
I've, well, how can you advise on something restricted means you've got to call it focused, call it whatever you want. That's the only products and services upon which you are authorized to advise,
when it comes to having advice, if your recommendations are going to be restricted to a panel of products, but you can certainly be what
do you do if someone comes to you with, I don't know, call it like a structured note from a discretionary manager, that you surely are duty bound. I can't advise you, I can't advise you on that I can't do anything with it, I can only advise you on this other range of products and services. I know that companies do have their outsourced services, I'll refer you on to our independent arm, for example, to do that, but I've just got this view on what the gold standard is for being a
financial planner. And to me, there's a there's a checklist of things. And we've sort of debated and discussed it in the past, but you'd be in financial, financial planning lead, for certain having a robust, sensible investment proposition that's defendable, and evidence based so on, I obviously would say being a chartered firm is another tick in the box. And obviously, being an independent
is a tick in the box. Now not everyone's gonna agree with that, of course, and people who aren't those things we're not going to agree with if I were starting from scratch and say, I'm going to optimize this is the optimal Gold Standard Model, there's five or six key points. You know, I would defend that all day long, why would you not I don't believe that the the the barriers to independent versus restricted are significantly
bigger or greater. And yes, there is an extra bit of friction, undoubtedly, there is. But I want to be able to stand in front of my prospective client, my existing client saying we are an entirely we're not only are we independently owned, we're not owned by third parties, or banks or stockbrokers. Anyone else pushing that agenda? And secondly, we are independent of thoughts of mind. And we are not, we don't have a restricted range of products and services
that we can offer to you. The reality is in the UK, the vast majority of the big national brands are restricted. And I think that's a competitive advantage for small independent boutique firms.
And so how much I will come on to you. I just think because I'm going down this route of just simplifying everything, like really getting the essence of things I don't want to be associated with. The whole product thing leaves me cold and independent thing is
about product. I say to clients, I'm independent in the broadest sense because as you do and I own No, nobody's got to share in my business there's no bank or building society or insurance company prodding me to sell a particular brand or product I am independent of mind as you'll find out if you come on board with me. But I just I this whole thing about focusing about the product is just just just drives me nuts. Andy,
I agree with both of you. But that's not my point. Tom decisive strikes again, I'm gonna I'm going to answer Tom's question set up on your own ASAP if your independent restricted is irrelevant. It will be a tough journey. But in hindsight, it will be the best thing that you've ever done to start up in your own ASAP don't sweat
you can you can join a network. You can you can you can be independent through via a network. And there are some better than others where you
can be independent or restricted via network. So right, the Exactly, yeah, the fact that it goes directly authorized or via network again, is I would
think it's been a long time since I did it. I think it'd be a tough gig. You guys have all done it set up as a sole trader advisor going completely directly authorised and can be responsible for your relationship with the FCA. I'm not sure I would do that for starting tomorrow. I think I would least as a stepping stone go go via a better quality network network. Yeah. And then let them take care of The junk and yeah, that yeah that that goes on with the regular it could
be a key stepping stone but yeah in answer to his question set up on your own ASAP I don't think you need to spend time at an independent firm. I think it's if you spent X years restricted firm, you're ready to go on your own. If you spent X years an independent firm, you're ready to go on your own. So yeah, if you think you're ready to go and car and you're
just just just to tie a bow on this particular point cabinet. And then my question is about out of interest. And for context for our for our audience, which is scattered around the globe in in Ireland, what's the roster split? And this is gonna get you on the hop, and you might not even know the restricted versus the independent. What's the touch split in terms of the number of advisors? Would you think in Ireland?
No idea. I would imagine, because there was kind of loose regulation up till a few years ago. Vast majority are fully authorized. So but I don't know, so I can't.
Okay. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Okay, let's move on to the second question. This is a lot of paper in this envelope. Take about two or three breaths reading this out. This is from Gavin Burton, who's on Twitter as at birth Tom, one. Okay, chaps Hello, I remain to be convinced about passive investing and Evi. Recently, the retire mentals podcast had a guest called Chris Hayes, who argued the passive investing does not influence the future of capital investment
flows will have lost already. I understand that you will argue this is an excuse for ESG investing and an excuse for active management. I also have my own reservations about ESG. And I'm sure Nick will concur. But I also believe there is systemic risk to passive investing. Am I have a lie down? Please refer to Mike Greene's comments the last five minutes on the trigonometry podcast at the end of January I think which I'm sure Nick will be familiar with. Just quickly interjection
here. I get my breath back. I do listen to trigonometry. I can't believe I listen. I don't think I listen to that episode. Back with the question. PAGE 17. He expressed real concern about the systemic risk of passive investing. Surely this is worth serious consideration to not actively consider the fundamental allocation of capital seems to contradict the very nature of capitalism itself. Surely at times, it's
amazing. Oh, god. Yeah. Okay, long story short, there's no, the quest side of things is, is passive investing. This guy can't be an advisor in the marketplace. Basically, I
think you can't be you can't be an advisor, who's an advisor.
That Oh, no, he i That's a trick trigonometry. It's not as good as this podcast, but it's not bad. I did. I did listen to that. Here's a couple of statistics to get your head around. First of all, every week, we all assume that the rise of passive investing and it's kind of global is dominating and the billions and trillions taken on by the Vanguard's and black rocks and so on. passive investing accounts and tons of ETFs. And actual funds accounts for guess a much 16%. Yeah,
yeah. So it's still a significant minority of the way their assets institutional and retail assets are. Just that's what that's the first first point. And the second one is, there is no such thing as passive anyway, we're all taking decisions at a high level about, you know, geography or asset allocation, new
inflows are astronomically weighted to the passive world. Yeah, total will be at 16%. But the new inflows I believe, are way higher than 50%. So again, we don't quite know how this is going to play out. Yeah, over to you, Nick.
Okay, well, I think we've given that any call anything to add to that, you know, okay. Okay. Thank you, Gavin. But
just to wrap this up, and because I don't want to just brush it under the carpet, it's, it's something that comes up on a regular basis, my take on the underlying, you know, the investment strategy structure, call it passive. Any variation on that? My view is far from perfect. It's not perfect at all. But to me, it's the least worst option, because if you follow what Gavin says, then that puts you in a corner and says, Well, now you got to go and select some active funds,
you got to go buy and sell. I don't know where to start with that. Because all the evidence is weighted against me in order to do that. So just estimate the power of the dark side. If so, it feels to me that, you know, whatever shade or variation of passive that you tend to employ is, yeah, it's the least bad
option. It's one that is the one that is the science and evidence would say your, your positive outcomes and more weight, they're more likely to have a positive outcome at this moment in time, maybe in 50 years or something, if it becomes a bigger thing that goes from 16% to 36% or something, but that itself creates more, but well that but that creates more opportunities for active managers. If everyone is slavishly buying the market. Then for sure, there are some
arbitrage opportunities. There are some sort of price seeking opportunities for active managers and then the wait might fall back But it tends to just you just rely on the natural order of things. And passive investing or factor based investing or Evidence Based Investing is the least bad option for me to day
the returns are generated, the returns are generated from the asset allocation, as we all know, too much focuses and other sort of unimportant areas. So yeah, I call it asset class investing. And you're right, Alan, it's the least worst option. And it's the, you know, putting the building blocks together for, you know, being the wealth engine for the clients. In terms of argument, passive and active, I've not ever really had that debate for years, I'm sure you guys have moved on from it as
well. But as I say, I prefer to go to an active advisor, that's 100% global equities, and the passive advisor that's 5050. The 100% active equity portfolio, things going to hammer the 5050 passive, so again, the guns are facing the wrong direction. In my opinion, it's all about the asset allocation. Yes, we want to keep the fees down. But the asset allocation is going to move the needle far more than active versus passive, and also
fees of the funds. So the asset allocation, I think is absolutely central to all of this.
Just just to close on this, we've all I think we've all been through this journey and where we were we initially were active, fun pickers, and then we make this transition because we believe the evidence is overwhelming. You're better off just buying the broad market and just going with the flow. And of course, that's happened through our profession over the
last 20 years. Did you do any of you guys know anybody who's who's done this with a passive approach for say 15 years and then gone back to active I don't know anybody, it really is a switch you make that change? It's a site it's very hard to see the compelling evidence for going back and so hard that no one ever does it in our experience. Okay, let's move on to culture corner. Okay, so the first culture corner is a book just asked by Graham Eisner.
Yes, that's from me. Graham Eisner is a he was the head or senior person at Goldman Sachs and their wealth management division, and I can't remember the exact statistics but he took their wealth advice arm, which obviously is dealing with super high net worth individuals, but really made a massive success and became, I think, their biggest, you know, biggest revenue generator across the whole company. Certainly in the UK, I spent some time with Graham has done some training
for us. His subject matter is all about referrals. We've talked about referral strategies on this podcast before. But for most professional services, and particularly for financial planners, it remains the number one sort of opportunity to grow, grow your business through word of mouth and having existing clients refer you to their friends, family and connections. But no one in my experience has ever nailed this stuff. No one
has got it, right. No one has had that I've ever sort of met, you know, any listener, by all means, you know, get in touch with us if you haven't nailed this, but a systemized, repeatable, scalable referral type structure model that is followed by all everyone in your company and is generating great opportunities for your business week after week. Graham Eisner has kind of done that. And he's built it in a clearly legitimate, successful wealth management business at
Goldman's. And he's written a book about it, and the book has just asked, and he unpacks the whole thing. There's seven key components to it. It's a very readable book just recently published, he's done some trading for us in our firm. It's good. It's worthwhile by the Book link in the show notes.
Great stuff. Thank you very much, Anna. The next two are from me and these might first listening seem seem well, you might be asking what on earth have they got to do with financial services, but the first book that I've just finished reading is the bet quite a well known book, Paul Ehrlich, Julian Simon and our gamble over the Earth's future.
So Paul Ehrlich wrote the population time bomb in 1960, or 69, said that millions and millions and millions of people will be dead by the end of the 1970s through famine, where there's just too many people on the planet. Paul Ehrlich is still alive he has been wrong about pretty much everything is one of these Malthusian prognosticators Of Doom is loved by the New York Times and The Guardian. And this guy, Julian Simon in this in the 70s said,
Okay, let's have a bet. Paul Ehrlich you think everything's going to hell in a handbasket that we're going to run out commodities and food and and they picked up five or six commodities, you know, silver, metals, whatever, iron and said copper and silica by the end of the decade, will these things cost more or less? And by the end of the 1980s, and Julian Simon said they're gonna cost less Paul Ehrlich said, no, they're gonna be way more and Julian Simon won this bet
between them. It's kind of you know, but it's just this ongoing thing that we have to be optimistic about the future because we have to be a fountain of optimism for our for our for our clients, right. You can't let you cannot be a successful investor. If you're a pessimist, it just cannot be done. And the books will entertaining It sounds quite drab. It's quite good and it's quite as fun bye.
into their life to Julian Simon has passed away they were these two academics were just bitching at each other in their papers and so forth. It was just super productive. Sounds
like that sounds like the trap pack.
Where did I ever came over to your the RSC but in the 90s there was a show in this country called the Newman deal show, a kind of Rockstar comedians at the time for they fell out. But they had a skip of these two academics who would go on stage with the sort of crusty historians. And and it would all be very serious. They'd be talking about some subject and then one of them would take a
perceived slight. And they just thought that you know, that tramp that lubes knew you use the railway bridge, who smells of Oui oui. I am familiar with that person. That's your best ever girlfriend.
And this is what this fool.
Anyway, so yeah, that's just an interesting book. But the second book is very similar to James Dyson. His book is called invention, obviously the inventor of the Dyson. You can't call it Hoover, because that's the whole point of it. But you know what I mean, fantastic British engineer, it took him 5127 iterations of his cyclone engine to get the thing working, he was almost broke. He's an engineer in a country that seems to now despise
engineering. He's got a great tale in there about building the ventilators, for the lockdown bedwetting episode and how the civil service just don't have a flu and change the rationale almost daily for six weeks before telling him not to bother. But I'll close with a comment from his wife who says optimism has to be the most loving and supportive attribute that James has. He doesn't just hope for the best. He simply believes that everything will
work out. And again, it's tying in to this thing you know, as financial advisors, our clients are bombarded with negativity all the time, everything is worse than it ever was before. We've got to be that well that they can draw on for optimism. We have to remain optimistic and give some of that to our clients. And those two books. Just you know, Ehrlich is wrong about everything. James Dyson, just crack on. Version 5126 Didn't work. Let's try version one. Oh, now it works. And now
I'm multimillionaire. And now I'm doing all kinds of things like opening up universities and encouraging engineering in this country. Just a great a great, great guy. Mr. wager on healing with Brendan ring.
Yeah, on healing is a podcast by hosted by a girl called Olivia hunt. And basically she talks to kind of people who have I suppose had some bereavement throughout their lives or whatever. And the reason I mentioned this one is Brendan ring is a friend of mine. He's a client of mine, and he lost his daughter cleaner. And you've probably have all heard me talk about cleaning his foundation. And we do a lot of
support work for that. Anyway, listen to the podcast, because we've all often set it to each other about how lucky we are. We all then five minutes later, take it for granted. And we all need reminders all of the time. And listen to the podcast and listen to what Brendan has been through. But listen to what little bit like what you're saying Nick what he turned it into, he turned it into this thing. I'm going to I'm going to be it's going to be himself and
Terry his wife. If this is going to be a force for good in in the in the memory of cleaner. It's an inspirational podcast. Olivia does a great job and talking to Brandon because I know Brandon wasn't very comfortable going in to do the podcast. Please, everybody have a listen and then realize after you finished it, how lucky you actually are.
Wow, brilliant. Thanks. Thanks. Go and I will do that son. And Mr. Hart. You have a culture corner for Michael Lewis.
Yeah, Michael Lewis is a famous author from the US. He has a podcast. It's got three seasons. It's absolutely awesome. I listened to two seasons years ago, and then the third season only recently. So that's why I put it on the culture corner. His podcast is via the Pushkin sort of network, which is about Malcolm Gladwell. His podcast network is called against the rules by Michael Lewis. He's written books such as the undoing project, which is
his latest one. His famous one was liars, poker flash boys. Superb at sort of narrative and stories. And the three series that he's got all three seasons that he's got against the rules of first seasons all it was all about the roles that referees play in, in sort of life in America. Season two is all about coaches. And season three is all about experts. It is absolutely
awesome. So if you're into your podcast into good stories, the Michael Lewis against the rules podcast is massive, strong recommendation from me.
I agree. I've listened to the first two seasons I didn't know it a third season. Yeah, that's I didn't really brilliant storyteller. I think I've read all if not most of his books. I just love the way Oh, he's X. I think Salomon Brothers trader, wasn't he so he knows all about the financial world. Hasn't you got a book out now about the whole kind of COVID as bad NASA snake reverser bedwetting episode The, I think he has or he's or he's about to have that. I
think that what he's working on is the crypto mess of FTX. So he's involved in that. So he's going to talk about the whole Rise of the whole crypto world and when it sort of happened and the story behind it, so that's going to be pretty awesome when that comes out. That's the latest book is working.
Yeah, that bug is gonna be amazing. And that that that that Netflix series is going to be amazing, like what those dudes and girls were doing was afterwards,
but he's changed tracking to its origins and the whole reason why this has all happened and stuff and he's going to sell it in an amazing story. He's actually got some sort of behind the scenes on the on the on the latest against the rules podcast. Again, he needs any explains to you how he puts his stories together and stuff is really, really, yeah, well, that's in the podcast that's in the podcast and against the rules. He he talks, he talks
about it. So to study a subject, he learns around the subject, and he knows that he's not going to use any of that in the book, but he just needs to get closer to the subject. So so he talks about this whole sort of process of put stories together. It is awesome. Awesome. Awesome. Yeah. Check it out.
Very good. Yeah, there's that famous pictures in there of Tony Blair and Bill Clinton and Sam Backman fried on on the stage. I sought to work out who's the biggest criminal okay. No, no, I think that's it, isn't it? I think we I think we're there for that. I mean, it's Christ almighty bank holiday and we're not an hour and a half into this. Wow. Wow, thanks very much. Well, every day is a half an hour or so. That's a wrap and stuff. So
thank you. For your precious and your input into the show rate isn't even six out of five star review on iTunes. We do love them. We'd love the kind remarks. It gives us some just amazing Phillips. Of course like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. But until the next time from the trap pack, it's at the OS and take care of their folks. Goodbye. Cheerio.
