Okay, business leaders, are you here to play or are you playing to win? If you're in it to win, meet your next MVP. NetSuite by Oracle. NetSuite is your full business management system in one convenient suite. With NetSuite, you're running your accounting, your finance, your HR, your e-commerce, and more, all from your online dashboard. Upgrade your playbook and make the switch to NetSuite, the number one cloud ERP.
Get the CFO's Guide to AI and Machine Learning at netsuite.com slash vox. netsuite.com slash vox. Thumbtack presents the ins and outs of caring for your home. Out. Procrastination. Putting it off, kicking the can down the road. In. Plans and guides that make it easy to get home projects done. Out. Carpet in the bathroom. Like, why? In. Knowing what to do, when to do it, and who to hire. Start caring for your home with confidence. Download Thumbtack today.
Adobe Express makes it quick and easy to create everything I need for my business. From social posts, TikToks and flyers, all in just a few clicks. Get Adobe Express for free. Search for Adobe Express to find out more. Hello and welcome to Rich Cast, the flagship podcast of stealing stuff Sam Altman has already stolen. You're on notice, Sam. You steal a car. I'm coming to steal that car. Look, I haven't been a lawyer in a long time. Isn't that double jeopardy?
Like if somebody else has done a crime and then you do the crime to them, you're good. If it's additive crime, I think it is fine. Yeah. I don't look. I passed the bar exam a long time ago. I've drank a lot since then. Just in the past five days of the Trump administration, I drank away one full bar exam. But I do believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, that if someone does a crime and then you do that same crime to them, the court's like, you're good.
Listen, if we've learned anything in the last two weeks, it's that you can, in fact, just say things. Whatever you want. Yeah. And sometimes those things. turn out to have huge weight over how america works so yeah here we are we're fully in the i declare bankruptcy stage of the american experiment as as i believe george washington uh prophesied in his first inaugural
He's like, one day people are just going to start saying stuff. And you should row a boat away from here as fast as you can. Those are all the things I know about George Washington. All right. There's a lot going on this week. I'm actually very excited about our second segment this week. Last week, we asked a bunch of you to tell us what you were using AI for because there's a big gap, right, in how people feel about it.
what the companies say about it, the amount of money we're spending on it, and then how people are actually using it. And it turns out a lot of you are using AI. We got so much feedback, like so much feedback, including from a bunch of people who were like...
were outraged at the idea that not everyone uses AI for everything all the time. And I really actually appreciate that. It was very cool to go through and be like, oh, these are like real people who use it in their real lives and not just like somebody. trying to convince me to give them billions of dollars. Are you sure that Sam Altman wasn't outraged? Do I think Sam Altman has a lot of burners and is in our inbox on occasion? I do think that. He does have access to ChatGPT. I will say that.
uh so we're gonna go through all those i think that's gonna be really fun we got a lightning round but we got to start i think with the the tech news it's the tech news and it's obviously that microsoft is continuing to launch intel powered surface devices No? For $500 more, you can have a Surface that has more words in the name and a chip you don't really want. And worse battery life. Congratulations. You did it.
There's something there. They did announce they're going to do this. They also announced that Microsoft is running DeepSeek now on co-pilot PCs that run Qualcomm chips. We're going to talk about DeepSeek in a second. But it's just interesting that there's still... Microsoft has to still carry Intel in this specific way because that partnership is so long and so important to everyone. But it's like everything about Microsoft releasing new service devices has changed in the past 18 months. Yeah.
to where two years ago they're like here's some service devices with arm chips i think the reaction would be and now it's here's some service devices with intel chips and it's like oh man you're still doing this and that's a big change Yeah, and it really did happen. A, really fast, and B, almost without anybody noticing. Like, I feel like every step along the way was also kind of meh, right? Like, in that first round of co-pilot...
Copilot Plus PCs, still the worst name in laptops, came out, they were fine, right? The overwhelming response was like, Qualcomm did... pretty good work here but the emulation stuff is still pretty bad the performances and what we it's like it's just not it's it's fine and then somehow between there and here
We've flipped all the way to, like you said, I see Intel Surface Pros and go, that's not what anybody wants. Like, it's crazy. To be clear, I don't think the ARM-powered chips are doing everything yet. There's a reason to sell Intel-powered laptops. Lots of people are still buying Intel.
powered Windows PCs, obviously. But it's just interesting to see where the bleeding edge has gone to. Like, it's obvious that that thing has runway in Intel. And, you know, along the way, they did fire their CEO. They did do that.
So maybe it's just vibes all the way down. That's not actually the biggest news. That was a joke and we ended up talking about it because it's for a test. The big news is DeepSeek. Yeah. It has turned the tech world upside down in just a very, the only way to describe it is a very bubbly way. Like everyone was over invested in over hyping AI and then everyone overreacted to another AI tool. What do you think, David? So I actually think that's the right.
frame for it. Because the more I've learned about this and the more I've talked to people about it, the more I've come to believe there are sort of three simultaneous things going on. On the one hand, there's the stock market freakout, which is just... a stock market freak out. A bunch of people, I would say, like, half correctly understood what DeepSeek is and made a bunch of weird semi...
thoughtful bets against Nvidia as a result. And there's been some really interesting reporting over the last few days that a big part of the sell-off was triggered by this one super deep, super... thoughtful blog post about somebody who was shorting NVIDIA. And he like writes this big thing and lands on short NVIDIA. It has no moat. This thing is not, this thing is massively overvalued. Got shared by a bunch of people in tech in.
you can kind of argue that that's what caused a lot of that. So on the one hand, there is just a lot of money was lost very quickly. So a lot of people got in a CNBC tizzy about that. So that's one thing happening over here.
The other thing is very much a story about technology and the actual questions of like, okay, how do we think about what... deep seek did here that is interesting and unique and how do we think about open source ai being really at the bleeding edge a lot of this stuff and what did deep seek do that is interesting that's going to roll back to some of these companies and what does it mean for open ai
That's all interesting. And I think we should spend most of our time talking about that. And then there's a third thing, which is just China. It's just the China of it all. And I think everybody... sort of twists themselves in knots about everything to do with China, in part for good reasons and in part for bad reasons. But like coming off of all this stuff with TikTok and Red Note and.
the ideas about what these companies are collecting about us and what it means that there is like technical leadership happening in those countries. And like everybody is just really spun up. to have feelings about China. And so there was a lot of feelings about China in there altogether. So it just became this like perfect storm of, I think.
Under a couple of really small changes, this would have been an interesting story and not the only thing anyone in my group chats cared about all week. But because it was those three things together, it became everything. Like, my high school friends are talking about DeepSeek. This has just been happening this week. Well, once you turn the entire economy into gambling, which is what we're doing, everyone cares a lot about the gambling. And to whatever, you mentioned the CNBC of it all.
Like most people's retirement savings are like in big index funds, which are all just big tech stocks. Right.
and so it's like eight companies now right so when nvidia goes down or apple goes down or meta goes down like actually the whole economy kind of goes with them which is not great there's a there's a lot of reading and reporting you can do about that that's not what we care about here at the verge but it's just notable that that's why it breaks through so often now yeah oh i agree and i think in in nvidia's case i mean the the like what people have been saying about nvidia for months
is that it has essentially propped up the stock market on its own for a very long time now. And it has gone through the roof like it. It's grown like crazy. And so, yeah, everybody has been saying.
There is a bubble and just pointing at NVIDIA. By the way, total side note, one of the funniest things about every time NVIDIA is in the news is the number of different ways people pronounce the name of that company. There's a lot of NVIDIA happening, like N-U-H-VIDIA, which I like. There's a lot of...
If you're paying attention to the Verge, there's some of that floating around the Verge lately. We're going to fix it. The thing is, I'm not sure anybody's wrong. Who knows? It's nuclear and nuclear. No, I know. Wait, hold on. There's a, we can't slide this far. There's an answer. We're going to, we're going to clean it up. That's all I'm saying. Okay. So it's like, we agree that you, you would pronounce it like in video. Like there's a sort of sign. There's an eye at the beginning. Right.
Yeah. Like a gentle eye. Their name is so stupid that they have pronunciation guidelines online. Do they really? Yeah. They have for years. Years and years and years. It doesn't matter because like... The CNBC people will just say NVIDIA. But also NVIDIA might be the company that most violates my theory that you can't overcome a stupid company name. And it's a stupid company name. It's hard to pronounce. It doesn't mean anything. It has nothing. It's just like an Amazon brand.
of letters that they happen to turn into. Oh, that's rough, but it's good. That's a rough chuckle. That's really good. I bought this NVIDIA battery bank. That's what I'm saying. $39 with a 10% coupon code. Yeah, like in a parallel universe, Ugreen makes all of the GPUs that people buy in the world. And this is where we are. But yeah, so the money of it is real. And I think to the extent that it's also tied up in all of this other stuff, it's...
That's important. But to me, that is actually like that is the thing people got most sort of bent out of shape about and took it to mean that there is all this other equally important stuff happening in these other ways, like with the tech itself.
And the more I learn about it, the less I feel like that's actually the case. So I keep making the comparison to Bluetooth with AI. It's just my go-to. Have you noticed you've been doing that a lot recently? You compare a lot of things to Bluetooth recently. Everything is Bluetooth. You don't remember this. When we do a first cast coffee table book, by the way, that's the title. Everything is Bluetooth. When Bluetooth first hit the scene, they were so proud of themselves.
And they're like, everything is going to be Bluetooth. Bluetooth is going to change the economy. They were out here talking about personal area networks or PANS. Oh, yeah. I wrote a lot of blog posts in Gadget about personal area networks. How's your PAN doing? It's awesome, dude. It's my Apple Watch and my AirPods. This is a real thing that was going to happen, right? Like we were going to blow up the world with Bluetooth. And then the actual.
in products didn't match the investment for years and so like it's a just a good comparison 5g actually is another great comparison uh we were in a race for that you will recall To what finish line? No one knew the answer. Robot surgery? Seems unlikely. Autonomous cars? There's some of them driving around. Sure.
sure but like that was the big input and you will also with 5g you will recall we had to beat china because if china got 5g networks first uh america was done right you can't can't have it Which is very much what people are saying about AI right now. It all just tracks. These things rhyme, right? The difference is when AT&T and Verizon spent billions of dollars to build 5G networks against whatever hype.
and whatever, graft, they at least knew they were going to sell people cell phones and cell service at numbers that people were willing to pay. Right? And the people who put Bluetooth everywhere, they didn't know that there would be AirPods.
But they could imagine AirPods and they were like, one day there will be AirPods. And then eventually Apple invented AirPods. Yeah, you could look at all the things with wires and be like, what if no wires? And like that, that worked. You could see how you'd get there. But with AI, we just keep, we're like, what if it bangs you? Is that worth $500 billion? For some people, the answer is decidedly yes.
We're like, what if it's agents and it does some clicking around the web for you? What if the rabbit R1 is great? What if the humane pin is great? To quote David Pierce, is this a thing? And there's not the finish line. Right. Where everyone's going to pay all of the money for the products that justifies all of the investment. And I think my version of the deep seek story is like. It just showed that all of this big upfront investment.
maybe isn't necessary and so meta doing dick measuring by how many nvidia gpus it was buying kind of is like oh wait are you just wasting money Like, is there an end result to this or can you just do it much more cheaply now? And I don't know the answer to these questions because I don't think anybody has really delivered a product.
That is going to pay it all back. In the context of Deep Seek, that conversation has been super interesting this week because like the case for all of this being good news for the.
mark zuckerberg you know talking about the size of his data center of the world is okay let me see if i can explain how the theory goes the theory goes like this if you make ai cheaper to make two things will happen one you'll be able to make better ai for the same price so you get the performance scale goes up right i can now make something 50 better
for the same price as I was planning to do it before. So thus, good AI. Then all the stuff that I've already been doing gets cheaper, so it becomes more accessible to more people who use it for more things, thus also better. So it's like this flywheel of... Scaling is what everybody is very excited. Dario Amadei, the CEO of Anthropic.
made essentially that argument right that now because all this stuff is getting cheaper and this has been happening for a while like deep seek didn't invent making ai cheaper to run like this has been happening for a while one of the very first google ios in this whole ai tumult like two years ago
Literally, Sindhar Pichai was saying the thing that we're best at is making things cheaper. Right. And so now what you're thinking is like, OK, if you're Sam Altman, instead of spending $10 billion to do. This thing, I can spend $10 billion to do the next thing, right? I can make the thing that I'm working on with all this money 50% better. But what is he making? This is what I'm saying. So I actually buy that.
theory, right? Like it all makes sense. But the question continues to be, what are we laddering all of this up to? What is the pot of gold at the end of this rainbow? And the my favorite thing that happened this week was did you read read Hoffman's New York Times opinion? essay that everybody was dunking on all week yes can i just read out loud two paragraphs from it please
He says, imagine AI models that are trained on comprehensive collections of your own digital activities and behaviors. This kind of AI could possess total recall of your Venmo transactions and Instagram likes and Google calendar appointments. The more you choose to share, the more this AI would be able to identify patterns in your life and surface insights.
you may find useful. Decades from now, as you try to remember exactly what sequence of events and life circumstances made you finally decide to go all in on Bitcoin, your AI could develop an informed hypothesis based on a detailed record of your status updates, invites, DMs, and other potentially enduring ephemera.
that we're often barely aware of as we create them, much less days, months, or years after the fact. This is Reid Hoffman writing about how AI is going to make humanity better and the best use case he can dream about is it's going to tell you... Which DM made you want to buy into Bitcoin?
what's the plan here? And now, and I've been thinking about this a lot with the questions of like, okay, well then, if all these companies don't need this much money, why are they raising all this much money? And it's like, well, because money is good to have.
And you should if you can raise it, you might as well. And so Sam Altman is out there raising unheard of amounts of money. And there are reports that they're about to raise anywhere from 15 to 25 billion more dollars now. Like. Sam Altman is. as good a fundraiser as we have ever had in this industry. And so he's going to go out and raise money. But it turns out, I'm not sure anyone knows.
what we're building towards anymore. And I am less and less sure every day that people know what the answer is to what problem they are solving with AI. So we're in this place where like DeepSeek is very interesting in that it is going to make It is going to help make a lot of this stuff easier and cheaper to make. The fact that it's open source, I actually think is on balance very cool. There are...
scary things about open source AI, but whatever. I think by and large, this stuff should be in the open and not in the hands of three companies. It's going to change the way that this stuff gets developed. People are going to like take the things that DeepSeek did, bring it in, make it better. The whole industry will get better. And to what end has not become any clearer at all? Yeah, it's funny. The Reid Hoffman thing, I read that too.
You know, like you do in Trump administrations, I've been spending a lot of time thinking about the inner lives of rich men. Sure. Very rich men. What do they want from me? Because they seem to be in charge of everything.
And it's just like, dude wants a friend. Like, I think a lot of these guys don't have, all their relationships are just people who want things from them. And so when they're like, what could this robot be for me? They just imagine just a friend who's known them since kindergarten.
But then do you think there's also a little part of them that's like wants their AI friend to know how rich they are? Yeah. Oh, absolutely. They're like, why don't you think my ideas are good? I don't want your ideas AI. I want you to like my ideas.
I just think if I have a piece of life advice for everybody listening, it's like you should have some non-transactional relationships in your life with people who just like you and you like them and that's it. You're not trying to buy and sell everything all the time. That might be good. For humanity. I always think about Steve Jobs. He would end all the keynotes with apples at the intersection of liberal arts and technology.
And like these dudes are like, fuck the liberal arts. It's like, no, that's the important thing. That's why that company is important because they like care about culture. They're like the computers are to make art with. That's why they can't make AI for shit though. But that's so funny. I don't know what Steve Jobs thought about AI, but it's like you look at the output and it's pretty bad. And it's like, is this good? Do you want to make more stuff with this?
I will say, Deep Seek, there's some copy going around that it had written about the nature of tools, which is a very Virgie thing to write about. Dieter made an entire video about whether or not computers are tools or instruments once upon a time. It was pretty good. You know, it's like not great, but it had some bangers in there, you know? It didn't sound like ChatGPT, which I mean is a compliment, right? There is this like, I think we're all kind of learning how to...
sense when something is written by AI. And it didn't sound like that. It was weird and kind of overdone and overwrought. And it was very much like a overly pretentious college sophomore writing a paper for their English class. But like... That's a lot better than ChatGPT, so I'll take it. Yeah, it's not like a receptionist who's kind of annoyed that you're there, which is ChatGPT's default tone. Like, I will be so corporate that you will go away, is kind of how ChatGPT writes.
but i just think that's like very fascinating like what are these what is this tool for and the first answer with the image generators was art Right. And then the second answer was the chat bots will write me 10 more episodes of Seinfeld. And then it was like, they'll kill Hollywood. And then we just kind of like brought it all the way down to like, it'll be a friend that'll book an Uber for you and maybe buy a sandwich.
And it's like, this is a really small vision. At the end of the day, just as we're talking, I think you just kind of mentioned it, David. OpenAID is in talks to raise more money at a $340 billion valuation. This is right on top of them announcing $500 billion to do Stargate, which is not real, right? That's the most, like, talk about Trump administration, standing in the White House announcing a project.
that you're not going to build as like the heart of the Trump administration experience. It's a giant novelty check. Like it really is. That whole thing was a giant novelty check for $500 billion. Sure. But the reality check on this whole industry right now is you're spending all this money because no one was stopping you. Everyone wanted crypto to be it and crypto wasn't it. So then maybe I'll be it. And because it can do something as opposed to crypto.
Like all the big companies are like, look at this new thing our phones can do. That's Apple intelligence. Like, great. But it hasn't done enough yet. And then DeepSeek comes along and they're doing it for way cheaper. And I still don't think it's good enough, but it's so much cheaper that it's like wiping out this like investment thesis that you need all of the money to make a friend. Right. And again, it goes back to the thing of.
You have to start to explain to people what you're making. And I think like the, this, this, this, we are making God thing. Isn't going to work forever. It's already starting to come unwound. Like a thing I've really noticed is. As Sam Altman and others have started to pull back on what they claim AGI is, this idea that we are like marching towards a singularity where these things are going to be as good as humans at everything.
is like getting more nebulous and weird. And so like, if anything, the goal posts are getting fuzzier for these companies, not more clear. And so it's wild that. It continues to be this frothy when it feels less and less like anybody has any idea what they're going towards here, except it will reinvent. the economy. And that's what you have to say, because that's the only way to raise 25 billion more dollars is to claim you are going to change the way that people live their lives.
And that's how Adam Neumann convinced Masa Son to give him a lot of money, and that went super great for Rework, and we're just doing it again at even more scale now. It is notable that SoftBank is investing into it. at large valuations it is also notable that you know sam altman is you know making videos where he's saying ai will require us to renegotiate the social contract
And Marc Andreessen is like, absolutely not. And then in the next breath, Marc Andreessen is tweeting like, imagine a world in which wages go to zero and everything is free. And it's like, well, that's renegotiating the social contract. I don't what are you talking like that? Also, none of that is going to I cannot say none of that is going to happen. It's just not like.
If that does happen, play this clip for me and I will be suitably embarrassed as I sit on the yacht that I got for free because of AI. This is not going to happen. And until then, it's like, okay. Sure, let's work backwards from reshape the way humans live our lives. What's the first killer app? What are you going to make for me that is great, that I like and use all the time?
It's Apple intelligence. You can summarize any email you want at the click of a button. Yeah. I saw an unnamed big tech executive. and I just said the words Apple Intelligence, and we just started laughing. I think that's right. That was basically where they were at with it. There are two other funny parts of the Deep Seek story. Interesting, but funny.
One is that deep seek is the result of, you know, Biden administration policies restrict chips in China. And so it really feels like a bunch of us AI researchers got lazy. and they were not optimizing their code enough and the chinese researchers with h800 chips which are nerfed h100s over optimized those chips to get better results in the h100s Which is just like a classic.
of computers story right yes like you start out with 64 kilobytes of ram and you just like worked your way up from there and then the old head programmers like these kids today are wasting cycles on animations like it's all it's it's just there it it's the same story yeah i don't know if it's
laziness i think i mean there's there's certainly some laziness they were counting on an infinite supply of processing power right right but that's like it's it's you know what is it constraints breed creativity like yeah
There is something to that, but I also think, I don't know that they were sitting around being like, well, we don't have to try hard because the chips will do it for us. Actually, now that I say that I do, I know for sure they were kind of doing that. See what I'm saying? Yeah, no, you're right. Once you work it all the way out, you're like, oh, they didn't.
They were just like, we'll just buy more chips. Like, Sam, get more money and buy more chips. Right. There was a brute forcing to this problem that everyone just assumed was going to be how we get better. Was that like... And they've been making changes to the foundational technology and like transformers are better than they were in 2017 when people started talking about this stuff. Like they're doing that, but nobody.
at these companies spent a lot of time thinking about how do I do this on worse chips because they just had the good chips. Right. And, you know, a month ago, we were talking about scaling laws. I'm like, can you just throw more horsepower and more data at this problem to make the models more efficient? And the answer is, like, kind of no. Right. might have been when the bottom should have fallen out of all these stock prices because
That answer was no. Then this moment was coming inevitably. Well, but then what they all did in response was say, OK, well, we're running into walls with our frontier models at these unbelievably huge things. GPT-5 is reportedly not what OpenAI wanted it to be. Nobody can find the next huge turn. And then they were like, but... if we do even bigger data centers and it's it's the same thing to your point it wasn't like let's go back down to the metal here and figure out like
from first principles how to do this it was what if we throw even more chips at it yeah which is how you get nvidia which is and and very much again you know and liz and i've been talking about parts of the nvidia story for a while now i think she's even written it up like there are startups
that are financing their purchase of NVIDIA chips with the NVIDIA chips as a collateral on the loan. Yeah. Because their assumption is that there will be so much demand for usage, they will be able to just like make it work. And it's like, that's a little.
that's got some nft vibes to it you know what i'm saying uh and you just see okay well they didn't the biden administration put restrictions on the chips we could sell in china and the chinese researchers at deep seek were able to ultra optimize those chips in a way that us engineers and researchers had no incentive to do and then this is so that's funny right that's like a
unintended consequence of a restriction yeah that like fine like it's funny in the sense that like trying to nerf the chinese ai market ended up tanking the u.s stock market Weird. It's pretty good. That's not what you want there. And then the second extremely funny part is this idea of distillation, where part of DeepSeq was trained by just like ripping off OpenAI's models in various ways. That's pretty good.
And like, you know, Sam Altman is like a little bit outraged by it. And it's like, Sam, you stole the entire internet. Everyone's so mad at you. Yeah, I mean, Deep Seek is apparently was built on top of Llama, Meta's model, and used...
vast quantities of output from chat GPT to train itself, which is just, it's just perfect. Like it's just, if every single stereotype you want to believe about the AI industry, every single stereotype you want to believe about China, like it's all right there. It's great. Yeah, and at least Meta, to its credit, is like, yeah, we made the model open source. That's what it's here for. OpenAI making noises. They have evidence that this was... And it's like, yeah, who cares?
A lot of people have a lot of evidence about you, my friend. You know what else should take the bottom out of the AI industry? Losing the number of copyright lawsuits that you are currently engaged in. I feel like I need to disclose at this time that Vox Media has signed some kind of licensing deal with OpenAI to make our stuff show up. show up and search gpt and uh honestly no one uses it so it's fine it seems right
That's way above our heads. But there it is. There's a disclosure. They just turned Gemini on for our Google Workspace. That's a thing that happened this week. Disclosure. We had to have a meeting trying to turn it off and keeping our data inside our own house. Even that, right? We're going to take a big bite.
out of the search market and knock Google off it, like it hasn't played out. And that's the biggest identifiable market so far, right? You will ask throughout questions and it will deliver your answers, right? We're going to make Google dance, all of that. It doesn't seem to have played out. No, and I think it's why everybody's betting so big on agents, right? It's like, okay, somewhere between we're going to take a cut of your...
DoorDash order and we are going to be the payments processor is like, that's the idea everybody has had. Like, I think it was you that said to me at one point on the show that everybody's business model ultimately is just payments processing. Like it's really, it's really extremely true. Everybody is just desperately trying to do payments processing, including now X this week, which we can talk about. But these ideas just aren't working.
It is true, and we're going to talk about a lot of the stuff that people are doing with these tools. It is true that people like using these tools, and that is a meaningful thing. But the question of what are they for? And maybe even more importantly, what is the business here? Super duper unknown. Like it's important to keep reminding you that.
The bigger open AI gets, the more money it loses. And that continues to be true. And like there was like the Uber thing that was like, you know, when when we win. we'll we'll take over and we'll raise our prices and like they they did win they did raise their prices they had to retrench in like a huge way and now they're making this much money yeah
That's not coming for any of these AI companies anytime soon, no matter how many billions of dollars you raise. It's just not coming. Right, because their product isn't as useful as when you push a button, a Toyota Highlander shows up. Right, and it's being commoditized.
Even faster than that. Like the thing everybody was worried about about Uber 12 years ago was robo taxis are going to come and just throw all this into chaos. That's happening in the AI world. Like all this stuff, whatever you build. as an AI model company is going to be copied and bested like immediately by six other companies. And this is just what we're seeing. So let me ask you this.
Microsoft had earnings this week. They're doing fine. But, you know, it seems like the Microsoft OpenAI relationship has been rocky for a minute. you know they were like part of the target announcement not really part of the target announcement that was mostly funded by oracle and softbank
Nadella was asked about $500 billion, and he's like, we've already committed $80 billion to Azure build-outs, and I'm good for my $80 billion, and just wouldn't talk about Stargate. And then this week, Altman and Nadella, Altman posted a selfie of the two of them, so the next chapter of this relationship is going to be great.
But then the companies had also announced that Microsoft's deal basically goes until 2030. I can't tell what's going on with these two companies right now. And especially he posted that after DeepSeek. And after Nadella is trying to calm down the market by talking about Jevons Paradox, which is what you're describing, where you make the thing cheaper so people use it more. What is going on with these two companies? I think it's as simple as.
They are, they're sort of in a mutually assured destruction thing where like Microsoft benefits so much from open AI being. a huge success because it has these agreements for all the cloud stuff that's happening because it's such a huge investor in the company. As OpenAI gets bigger, it uses more Azure.
which is more money for Microsoft. Like Microsoft literally wins coming and going when it comes to open AI. So if I'm Satya Nadella, it makes sense to be doing both of these things. You both want to shore this stuff up in-house in case this company. implodes in some meaningful way, which A, it has already done once, and B, could just happen again. The people a lot this week have been talking about
The fact that most of OpenAI's co-founders aren't there anymore. There are many litigious people circling around this company. There are lawsuits circling. OpenAI is both absolutely chock full of money and pretty fragile. in a lot of ways. So I think if you're Satya Nadella, you're like, okay, I need to not be fully reliant on it, but I also am going to make so much money from OpenAI if it hits that...
it's worth a selfie and a nice tweet a couple of times a year. That's a pretty low-risk way to at least keep the piece enough that nobody gets... super nervous about it like one selfie like he's got a chart in his office it's like options one selfie invest 200 billion dollars leak phone call to Sam like yeah be caught having lunch with sam at sweet green is like 200 billion dollars like it's i i really i think i think these companies hate each other and i think they know it's better
to be stuck together for a while yeah and to root for each other because it will be successful for everybody but i think they will be uh in in they i think sam and satya both go home at the end of day and like throw darts at a at the other person's face the really interesting thing is you know microsoft's core business is azure like in the realest way
Azure's doing great. You know, their earnings are out. There are parts of the Azure business that are like different than the others. Like their new customers are not signing up for AI. They're just signing up to be cloud customers. And they kind of announced during the earning call, like. Yeah, we stopped trying to do that. We're back to just trying to...
get cloud customers. That has happened in a real way. That's actually been a big moment that both Microsoft and Google were like, okay, we're going to charge $20 a month extra on top of the normal like workspace or office subscription and you're going to get all the AI stuff. Uh, and people didn't like $20 per month per person for.
nebulous AI features turned out to be an awful lot to ask. And these companies, like you said, they need more cloud customers, and they need people to use the AI in order for the AI to get any good. And so they have just walked it all the way back. And what they want is they want you to use their tools that make the money. And then they want to shove AI at you so that you use it. And maybe someday we'll pay for it. Yeah.
We'll see how that goes. But that's like a really interesting piece that Microsoft is at least reselling whatever capability it has. Google's reselling it. Amazon's reselling it. NVIDIA sells the chips. they you know like jensen flies around the world when his jet made of money meta is really interesting in here because they're the only ones who don't resell the capacity they are buying all the gpus they're building a huge data center the size of manhattan like crazy
But they sell none of it. It's all for meta. And either that's a lot of risk, right? They have to get the value out of it. Or they figured it out. And in their earnings. this isn't great i don't love it but they're like we are increased ad targeting yield by sorting through all of the ads we can show people faster and that's what the gpus are for and it's like oh they actually figured it out
They know why they're spending the money. They're not just trying to resell capacity to somebody who's going to make a killer app or assuming that they can make digital cod. Yeah. They're like, oh, there's a thing we do with this that actually goes faster because we're doing it. Yeah. I mean, the killer app for AI might be ad targeting. Yeah. Which is terrifying. I want to be clear. That sucks. Yeah.
and and meta would love for you to not think about that and instead think about smart glasses uh but like meta is building those data centers to serve you better ads not to like let you wear glasses on your face. If they can do all that stuff, terrific. But the business case for that Manhattan-sized data center is advertising.
And I think that's what is happening across the world. It's true for Google. It's true for a lot of these companies. Ads are going to be how a lot of these things support themselves in a way that I think people are not yet ready for. and in the case of meta and google specifically they have already started down this road where the end result is your some advertiser
And you just type in who you want to reach and you put in the first version of your ad. And then it makes infinite variations of that ad targeted at specific people. So everyone is seeing their own ad.
and that's what the generative ai is for and this is either good or bad you know like it's bad but but like you know from those companies perspective uh there they might spend less money in advertising but meta might make more because they're showing more ads that convert more clicks and purchases and you can just see how you get to this is all good and then you can also see how the user experience of
the platforms will go to hell because they're going to be just choked to death with AI slop and extremely weird AI ads. And it's already happening. Like, I don't want to pretend, I don't want to be like, this is something like vaporware.
idea like tick tock has some of this capability in their ad sack today meta and google are already saying to creators let people chat with ai avatars of yourself like they are training the user base to see ai content and think of it as the regular part of the user experience and then it's just it's just one turn to hey ford give us a bunch of money and we'll have infinite ad for explorers that like
We know everything about this person. And we'll be like, hey, we saw that you bought a lot of stuff at the store today. that would fit better in a Ford Explorer, like down to that level of targeting. Or it'll show me the color of Ford Explorer that I'm most likely to like in the setting that is most likely to make me want to buy it because that is data that these companies have. Like, it's going to get...
really weird. And I think the like uncanny valley of targeted advertising is about to be explored in a really fascinating way. I will say One of the funniest things about this is that it is going to make Amazon look even stupider because Amazon still does the ad where you're like, I buy a hat on Amazon. And then for six months, Amazon's ads are just like, do you want to buy that exact hat that you already bought? Yeah. How about a hat?
do you like hats? Here's a hat. And I'm like, and it's just like Amazon. If AI can fix that, I'm in. Give me AI. Just stop it with the S. Boil the oceans. Take this hat away from me. That's weird. Look. Okay. We've done enough negativity around AI. I do think that this thing is a bubble and it has popped to some extent and it might bubble again, but there's just, I don't, it's not just deep seek. It's the products it's.
I'm going to compare it to cell networks again because this is just the world I was raised in. The money we spent on LTE was good. We have a lot of newer listeners, but if you are... here with us from the beginning, you will remember that the iPhone getting LTE was a big deal. Yeah. Right. And the iPhone launching without 3G was like a legitimate criticism of the product at that time.
It had edge. It had 2G networking. It was too slow. And putting Wi-Fi in it was the big innovation. This is all impossible to think about right now. But when the iPhone got 3G, that was a big, big deal. Because it meant that it could access the internet faster and was usable on the go as an internet device. When it got LTE, that meant it could do video. And that's when a bunch of mobile video took off and became a thing.
When I got 5G, everyone was like, that's going to happen again. It just didn't. It didn't. It super didn't. What is this for is a question people should ask much more often about technology. I will say. I just want to say one nice thing about DeepSeek, and then we should take a break and talk about cool things people do with AI. Learning about DeepSeek sent me down a deep rabbit hole on chain of thought reasoning. Yeah.
which is one of the technologies that DeepSeek did a really good job with. Basically, like, these reasoning models all these companies are coming out with that kind of show you the way that they think. Truthfully, I thought of that as kind of a gimmick that was like...
less doing something different and more just like pretending to be human so that you trust it more. But what it actually is, is DeepSeek and other companies have found ways to basically instead of generating one token that is like the answer to your question it's able to generate a bunch at a time and actually go step by step and try to think through a problem and what deep seek figured out how to do is how to
use a technique called reinforcement learning, which basically rewards and punishes a model when it does things right and wrong. teach it how to do that kind of step-by-step reasoning inside of the model. And so there's a great moment in one of the technical papers where the model starts to answer a question, goes step-by-step.
gets it wrong, realizes that it is going down the wrong road and is going to make a mistake, backtracks and starts over. And that is like a powerful... moment in the history of ai because all this stuff is like if you just think about it as like it's generating the next word every time it doesn't actually have the capability to go back and be like wait where did i go off track it just keeps going off track and with something like this like
This is the kind of thing you will start to see in every other model very quickly, I think, because the reasoning model is, A, there are pretty strong studies to suggest that it's vastly more accurate. when you ask these things to go step by step, because instead of trying to answer the question all at once, it answers it step by step, which is like the correct way to do things. But that also, the more you let the model do that.
Like the longer you let it take and the more steps you let it take and the more you let it think and try and poke around and do stuff, the more accurate it actually is. So there is a path toward we can do this better. And it looks like these reasoning models.
There are huge compute challenges there. There are huge latency problems there. Like that stuff is going to be hard to do in a way that is like good user experience. But the idea of you can teach a model to be wrong less seems to actually be. plausible and i think that's very cool and deep seek is way out in front of that idea fine you've convinced me let's give sam 500 billion dollars fine sold i believe did you download the deep seek app no i didn't either
I got so freaked out by, like, just their terms of service are just like, we'll give the data to anyone in the government who asks. And they've already leaked some. Yeah. Yeah, there was a whole database that got leaked. don't download the app people and definitely don't log in with like your Google account and your email address. Like be, be careful, please.
uh also when i tried to download it because none of that was my actual concern they had shut down registrations because they were overloaded i see so you tried and were foiled yeah i tried to get you said you said listen china and said no no I should have that club drunk and they would not let me in. They were like, no shoes, no shirt, no service, sir. All right, let's take a break.
That's been enough. We've been enough negative Nancy. Let's see what the people are doing and whether that justifies $500 billion. Sam Altman. We'll be right back. Support for the Vergecast comes from Grammarly. AI tools are all over the place. And if you run a business. Figuring out how AI can help you is huge. It might be time to check out Grammarly. Grammarly says they employ enterprise-grade security measures to protect your organization's data and keep your private information private.
And it's designed to fit your unique professional needs and works right away. With over 15 years of experience focusing on responsible, secure AI, Grammarly isn't just another AI communication assistant. It's how companies like yours increase productivity while keeping data protected and private. I've even got to try out Grammarly. I'm always moving from meeting to meeting, and I have to make sure that in between the emails that are going out are professional. Grammarly helps me do that.
Grammarly is backed by a user-first privacy policy and industry-leading security credentials. Plus, Grammarly also emphasizes responsible AI so your company can avoid harmful bias. Join 70,000 teams and 30 million people who trust Grammarly to work faster and hit their goals while keeping their data secure. Go to grammarly.com slash enterprise to learn more. Grammarly, enterprise-ready AI.
Support for The Verge Cast comes from 1-800-Flowers. Valentine's Day is coming up, and you can let that special someone in your life know just how special they are with the help of 1-800-Flowers.com. They offer beautiful, high-quality bouquets. And this year, you can get double the roses for free. When you buy one dozen from 1-800-Flowers, they'll double your bouquet to two dozen roses. Of course, roses are a classic, sweet way to say I love you.
And 1-800-Flowers lets you share that message without breaking the bank. All the roses are picked at their peak, carried for every step of the way, and shipped fresh to ensure lasting beauty. So my cousin just had her first daughter and I wanted to celebrate the moment by sending her flowers from 1-800-Flowers.com. It was super easy to order. I just went online, picked a bouquet I wanted.
It was there by the next day and they looked super awesome and great. And she shared the photo around with our family and our group thread. So that made everyone really happy. They say the bouquets are selling fast, but you can lock in your order today. Win their heart this Valentine's Day. at 1-800-Flowers.com. To claim your Double Your Roses offer, go to 1-800-Flowers.com slash Vergecast. That's 1-800-Flowers.com slash Vergecast.
All right. So last week, we pointed out a gap that I think we see in all of our AI coverage. You might have even felt in the last segment that there's how people feel about AI. Which in our comments is bad. Straightforwardly. There is a real like principled stance against it as a whole. It's a plagiarism machine. And maybe it is. Like I said, the other...
leg of the stool that could get kicked out is the New York Times winning its copyright case against opening act or Sarah Silverman or any of these. Wasn't it Mark Andreessen who was like, if you don't let us. steal from the whole internet this all falls apart yeah he wrote it in a letter to the copyright office perfect where he was like I need you to
I need you to do me a favor. Then he bought the government, so we'll see what happens. Yeah, there's that. By the Copyright Office this week announced a clarification on its rules, saying if you make art with AI, that gets copyrightable. Art made entirely by AI is not. No gray area there. That won't be confusing to anyone. Super, super straightforward. Anyhow.
There's a gap. The gap that I'm saying is people are mad about it, especially in our comments across the internet and various social media platforms. It's movie studio puts up a poster with AI. They get bullied right off the internet.
Then there's what the companies tell us, which is people are using this stuff like crazy. DeepSeek is at the top of the app store. ChatGPT, most popular app by growth in the history of all applications. I think it's a little bit less than that, but you get what I'm saying.
And then there's just the stats that we hear from the companies themselves that are sort of like less invested in the hype. Like the one I always call out, I called out last week, Adobe CEO Shantanu Ryan told me on Decoder that people use generative fill at the same rate as layers in Photoshop. Which means they just have opened Photoshop. Right. Like, that's just an identity. Yeah. There's this big gap in...
how people are saying they feel about AI, the hype, we're going to make digital God. And then the sort of like mundane reality of a lot of people are just using this stuff and a lot of people like it, but they don't perceive themselves as like using AI. So we asked. Listeners, send us what you're doing. And David, it sounds like everybody responded. Yeah, we got a lot. We heard from a bunch of folks on social. We got like dozens of calls to the Vergecast hotline. We got a whole bunch of emails.
Everybody, it turns out, uses AI. And there are at least a lot of people out there who had a use case that they wanted to share. So I figured we should just go through a bunch of them. And I think I tried to pull ones that are reflective of trends that we saw in the responses. So if you're down, I'm going to read you some emails and I'm going to play you some hotlines.
We're just going to talk about it because they all made me feel a lot of feelings and we need to sort through them together. What is the show? But sorting through feelings. So I'm going to not say the emailers names because.
Some of this stuff is very personal, and also most people in their emails don't explicitly give us instructions whether to say their names. I think a few of the folks on the hotline say their names, but I feel like if you say it into the voicemail, knowing we're going to play it on the show. That's fair game. So I'm so sorry if I'm outing you here on the first cast. This first email is from Sam A. All right, let's start with. Ilya S has a note for us about how good AI is.
So here's one email we got. It says, I was recently diagnosed with a stomach issue, so it's been difficult for me to find and know things that trigger and don't trigger a flare-up. So when it's really acting up, it's super easy for me to just take a picture of a menu at a restaurant or bar and just ask what...
What can I have? And from what I've told chat GPT from the doctors, it can just tell me what's safest to eat and drink, even telling me the exact ingredients that are safe in those dishes. That's awesome. Like unambiguously cool use case. That's a great use case. It's just like I. Again, just being negative, I don't know how the restaurant actually made the food. I don't know if things hallucinate. This is what I mean. I'm just prone to see the risk, and I think...
that's an email where people see the benefit. So this is, you just brought up the exact thing that is going to come up an awful lot in these, which is you are going to see a trend in which There is a question of how much should I trust this? And one of the things that consistently surprised me is a lot of people saying it doesn't really matter. That like, I understand it has flaws. It might not be perfect. It's something. Like here, let me read you one.
I've often felt intimidated by the professional and technical demands of public service. However, ChatGPT has given me the ability to communicate more effectively, present my ideas professionally, and quickly understand complex topics. From rebuilding water treatment facilities and developing billing systems to ensuring... Again. Very cool. To me, I immediately read that and go, how many of the EPA regulations do you think chat GPC just flatly gets wrong? Yeah.
Just just fully hallucinates some made up thing. And I feel with a lot of these things, I keep coming back to like it's going to work for you until it blows up spectacularly in your face. Right. And it's like it's the same with the eating in the restaurant. as long as it's right. And let's say it's right 80% of the time, which is probably kind to most of these systems. But let's say it is. You take a picture of your food or you upload a PDF of a regulatory document.
ask it questions it's often going to be right but when it's wrong if you trust it really bad things can happen and so i i feel like where i fall on the like but what if it doesn't work scale
might just be different than some other people. But that just is the thing I keep thinking about with all of these. Yeah, I don't trust computers. I have a weird job in that regard. But as David knows, when I record this podcast at home... I insist on recording locally to another recorder and not letting my Mac do the recording because I just don't trust the Mac, which is weird because I should.
But I will say on the flip side. But I just like that's the frame that I'm in. Right. Whereas it's like what I hear in that email is not about trust. It's about. I worked out this idea so that I would have the confidence to go have the idea. And that's really different and interesting. How so? Say more about that. I mean, I...
That person sounds like they have a very complicated job. They have to know how to do everything. They're like designing a water plant, right? Yeah. I hear that and I think, well, you already did know how. Right. Like you have the capability of doing it. And what you needed was a conversation or a more easily digested reference material or whatever to get you over the hump. Like.
You just solved your imposter syndrome. The AI didn't do it for you, right? It just helped you get to where you were inevitably going to be. I think there's something to that. And I think there's also... a recurring theme in a lot of these that is basically like i just needed something I didn't have a tool to do this thing and now I have a tool to do this thing and even if it doesn't necessarily do it well the fact that it does it at all
is something right and it's like i i think that i started with the food one because that is one that there isn't a clean other answer to right like i see on reddit all the time the people who go to a restaurant with like those huge
placards of like, here's all the food I can't eat. And they hand them to the chef. And then the chef posted it on Reddit being like, this asshole came to my restaurant. And to have something that is like, I can take a picture of this and it is going to give me even reasonably reliable information about.
what this is and whether I can safely eat it reasonably reliable and easy is probably a huge step up from the alternative in this case. And I think that's, that's something really meaningful. And so there's this sense that like something is better than nothing.
is is so pervasive through a lot of this and i think is really interesting in a way that i didn't give it credit for all right let me let me play you a couple of voicemails we got hi this is alex and i wanted to call in to talk about how i use lms in my daily life I use ChatGPT as an on-demand advisor of sorts. You know, how can I improve this recipe? How much cat litter should my cats be using per month? What are some good ways to...
save time at the gym, if these are my priorities. A lot of these things are things I could use Google for, but it's just quicker to ask ChatGPT. Another thing I use it for, as a way to organize my thoughts. So if I'm ruminating about something, I'll just talk to ChatGPT. It's no replacement for my therapist, but it helps reorient my thinking when I need it to. I know I could also get this from my friends, and sometimes I do, but ChatTPP is nearly always available.
instantly. I find that very compelling, I have to say. Yeah. I mean, again, it's hard to tell anyone they're like... doing it wrong yeah like that's that's great i'm like very happy that that's working in that way the thing that grabs you know that one in particular is it is the thing that google is afraid of right
But it's also the thing that these products have shown themselves to be the worst. Like how much cat litter should my cat use every month is, well, first of all, it depends on the cat. But second of all, it's like that's the one where it's like you should feed your cat rocks. Like it's like that's what will happen. Put glue in the cat litter. It's like it's just sitting there. Yeah. I think this is just really eye-opening for me in that.
To your point, it's just good enough. It's just something. And as we have covered exhaustively, typing that sort of thing into Google right now is like getting mugged in an alley. Seriously. Yeah, no, there is a real... thing that i i keep hearing in a bunch of these that is just how aggressively google fumbled the bag of search that like
What people want is better Google, not chat GPT. And Google just threw all of that away. But I think one of the things that you say all the time is that the internet is about to be flooded with C plus stuff. And I think. What we might be underrating is how valuable a C-plus can be sometimes. Like maybe a C-plus delivered to me easily and quickly at all times is actually something. Is that bleak as hell? Probably, but it's something. All right, let me keep going.
That's like why they invented legacy admissions at Harvard. That's what you're describing. What if we can just accept a flood of C-plus applicants? Yeah, and that goes fine. What are you talking about? All right, here's the next one.
Hey, this is Jake. I've listened to your recent podcast where you've mentioned how you want people to call in and say what they use Chad GPT for in the real world. I use it weekly to make my shopping list. I ask you to make the recipes based off of what I have in my house.
and what i'm going to buy um try to make it where i can get it as macro friendly as possible one of the features that i've started using more recently is whenever i make a shopping list i ask it to make an optimized shopping pattern for a standard location of where I'm going. So if you want to Costco or Aldi, I can make sure that I'm shopping in the most efficient. And then I ask it to find substitutes for recipes.
I use it for pretty much anything that it comes to for vacations, trips. I use it for planning. Those are some of the main use cases that I use it for outside of my work. All right. So first of all, that's all great. Man, Google blew it. You just described everything Google has ever demoed at Google I.O. I know. But you're doing it in chat. I know. Yeah.
Yeah, like there are a hundred Google Keep features that you just described that no one uses. Yeah, no, this to me was the one that I was like, the most sort of down the middle simple use case is like... i'm gonna write a list of stuff that i have in my fridge you're gonna spit back some recipes and then i'm gonna say can you optimize this list to go to costco like chat gpt is great at that do it love it yeah and then the next turn is
go on Instacart with Operator and order it for me, right? You can see how you connect all those thoughts. Next time I go to Costco, I'm going to tell ChatGPT to give me directions around Costco, and I'm only going to follow ChatGPT. We're going to see how it goes. This is actually the part... where he said that, I'm dying to know more here. It really implies that ChatGP knows how Costco's organized and just based on my Costco.
It's a war zone. I'm not sure Costco knows how Costco is organized. That's what I mean. It's like, I've asked Costco employees where things are and they're like, no, no, no, no, no. Good luck to you, sir. Yeah, it's a secret. You're not allowed to know. But yeah, that kind of thing. i'm always talking to people about like what i what do i think are good use cases for chat gpt and the one i always come up with is movie recommendations because it's like super low stakes
but actually a thing AI is unusually able to be good at where I'm like, I like these three movies. What else should I watch? And it's like, that's a thing. LLMs do very well. And this kind of like recipe remixing is another good example of that. So I just thought that was great. All right. Let me read you another email. Real tone shift here. You ready for this? Yeah. We got an email from somebody who's going through a divorce. and said, ChatGPT has been a surprising source of support.
Let me be clear. I don't use it as a talk therapist, parentheses, gross, but rather as a tool to help me communicate effectively and with kindness. My wife is very sensitive to perceive criticism. So I draft emails to her and then use chat GPT to help me soften the tone, make them warmer and remove anything that could be interpreted as critical. Wow. Right?
So I'm married to a divorce lawyer. I have heard about an infinite variety of passive aggressive emails between partners for the past several years. I feel like I should just go tell her about this. It's really interesting, right? Yeah. this one i was like i don't know how to feel on the one hand it there's like a piece of this that kind of makes me sad that it's like it's a bummer that there is a web app that has to be your tool for this but on the other hand like
Again, what's your alternative? Where else would someone go to do something like this? If you took this out of the bigger context of AI and all of the noise and all of the hype and you were like, there's a new feature in Grammarly. Right, five years ago. Or you're like, Google Docs has a new feature that just helps you de-passive aggressive in email. I don't know that anyone would have any reaction to this other than that's actually pretty good. Yeah. Yeah, I think that's right.
And it's only in the context of all the AI hype and, you know, that horrible Apple commercial where it's just like bad employee sends professional email. And like, this is what Apple intelligence is for. This is maybe the most human of.
the notes that we've gotten yeah right and that i mean not to say everyone else isn't human but like this is a very emotional task that is being performed totally and i i really do think if you took this one out of the ai bubble and all of baggage that comes with it you put this in any other product five years ago and everyone's like oh this rules yeah yeah i mean i think it goes to show that a our our vocabulary about
AI is still so primitive. We call everything AI, and actually AI is lots of wildly different things, and we need to get to the point where we're better at talking about them as different things. But it also, to some extent, goes... to show how versatile something like ChatGPT is. Like all this stuff is happening in the same text box, right? Like it's a pretty remarkable thing. Also very notable, everyone has said ChatGPT.
Every single person. We haven't gotten one Dolly. We haven't gotten one Gemini. Nope. No, no Apple intelligence. A little bit of Claude love in a few. Oh, it's coming. Okay. A little bit of Claude love. I don't think I pulled any of the ones that people use Claude, but. Sorry, Claude users. Claude was mentioned. I don't think Gem and I came up one time in the emails that we got. Brutal.
But Claude, people were like, oh, I mostly use ChatGPT and like some Claude. There was a lot of some Claude. All right, let me play you another voicemail. Here's a, again, we're just going to tone shift all over the place here because that's what AI does. Here we go. Hey, this is Leo from Atlanta, Georgia. Neil, I asked what everyone's using their AI systems for, and I use mine almost exclusively to solve.
hard questions in the word puzzle game word salad. Also to note, I recently discovered that something about David's voice makes me super tired and helps lull me to sleep. So I want to give a quick shout out and thank you to Mr. David Pierce for... uh improving my sleep quality and helping fight my insomnia thanks guys love the show something on david's voice makes me super tired first question was that a compliment or an insult yeah that's really that's a tough one
You make me sleepy. Yeah. He said, thanks. I don't think you meant it. But that one, like another in the line of like movie recommendations, right? Like pretty low stakes, pretty straightforward. This thing has a lot of information and it can spit some information back at me. Yeah. It works. You're cheating, but it works. You are cheating. To be so clear, you are cheating. It's okay. I've Googled what's the wordle answer before. It's fine. It's bedtime for you, sir. We all have bad days. Yeah.
Okay, let me find the next one. I've been fascinated by my mom's usage of AI. She's 49, and while she uses it a lot for her small business, writing, posts, et cetera, I've noticed that over the past year, she's also started to use it as a general Google replacement in her personal life as well. She wants to know a fact. She asked ChatGPT.
She has to write a WhatsApp message that requires minimum thinking. She asked ChatGPT. Last week, she found out one of her close friends is struggling with her mental health and having suicidal ideations. And I shit you not, she asked ChatGPT what are the best ways to support someone who's depressed. Again.
Just Google fumbled the bag. Like people want better Google. Yeah, but this is the one. Again, these are real people. Everyone use their computer however you want. I'm happy it's working. But this is the one that's the. the blinking red danger sign right it's like oh everyone just needs a friend like sure right there's there's just an element here where this is to me like this is where the robots hallucinate all day long
And what you're getting is better Google with worse results, presumably, but in a better interface or more reactive or just someone to talk to you in a way that's natural. And it's like. This is the one where it's like, if you tell me this is the use case, I will confidently tell you this does not support $500 billion data center built out. Oh, 100%. Because it doesn't scale.
the thing will happen that happened to Alexa in Siri, which is you'll do this until it fails you, and then you will stop thinking you can do anything more than this. Right? Like, you're like, Siri, tell me a joke. And it's like, I don't, I give up. Right? Like, fine. Timers and music, it is. And I'm not saying the ceiling is, the ceiling for ChatGP is so much higher, obviously, but there's still a ceiling.
And the ceiling is when it lies to you, right? When it makes something up. When you ask it for movies and it gives you three real movies and one fake one, and then people are literally showing up at public libraries asking for books that don't exist. Yep.
And that that's what I mean. It's like when lawyers show up in court citing cases that aren't real and they get disciplined by the bar association, that's the pro like they can't overcome. They don't know how to overcome that. And so like this one to me is like. Yeah, every experience is valid. Like, great. And it's really interesting to see how different people are approaching it. But this is the one that hits the wall the fastest.
interesting yeah i mean i think i agree but i also think there is a a more charitable way to look at that that says uh the human is still kind of in charge here right like i think it's it's one thing to uh have these things do things on your behalf, right? And this is where I think things like operator get really messy. Like, would you let chat GPT text your wife for you?
Like, even something relatively innocuous. Again, David, I don't think I've made this clear enough. I'm married to a divorce lawyer. No, but even something very simple where you're like... That woman can have chat GBC divorce me. It's just a macro on her computer. It's a work issued windowed laptop with a button that says D and then my life is over. Fair. Yeah. But like, okay, fine.
Helen Havlack, our boss. Our boss. Would you like voice mode chat GPT and be like, hey, will you text Helen and tell her I'm running late, but I'll be like 10 minutes late to the meeting? Why wouldn't I just text her that? No, no, but just go with thought experiment with me here for a second. Okay. Would you let it...
take that act like do that on your behalf not say here's a message you might send but be like send this message for me chat gpt would you have it do that yeah abstractly yes really see i wouldn't i like just the there there is a certain thing where I'm like, okay, if you want to write the text and then I'll look at it and send it. Yeah, I guess that's what I'm imagining because that's how I use Siri in the car. No, but I even get freaked out in the car because you say it.
And it reads it back to you. And I'm like, what if it like put weird punctuation and a period at the end? And my wife is middle finger emojis between every word. Don't know. Yeah. Okay. And I still like, I truly get nervous about doing a text that I can't look at the words before I send them. And I.
I think that's where all of this agentic stuff gets really messy for me because I'm expecting you to do things. But again, just to finish this out, in this case, the idea that I'm asking ChatGPT to give me ideas about how to support a friend. I think is less terrifying than the idea of like, send my friend a supportive text message, which would be horrifying. I scrolled down and I'm reading the rest of the same email. Turn about the mom.
And the second part of the email is the most important part of the email. Okay. Here's a quote. Most people I'm friends with or that listen to the show are probably concerned with accuracy, environmental impact, development of critical thinking, et cetera. She, the mom.
could frankly not give less of a shit. And I suspect people like her are likely to be the majority, not because she's dumb, she's brilliant in other ways, because she's just not wired that way. And this is your point about good enough.
yeah right it's just the computer's talking to you and it sounds fine and that's good enough and i i'm just very convinced that we live in an age where just being confident it's like all you need like just blustering through it is very effective in a variety of domains and maybe that collapses on itself we'll find out but that's like the whole population is primed to just be like
confident talking that must be right totally wired ran a headline the other day something to the effect of the less people know about ai the more they like it uh and i'm there based on a study that i think it was like a marketing firm did basically defined that
if you don't understand what's happening, AI seems great. And that makes perfect sense to me. That feels exactly right. And I think most people don't understand what's happening. And maybe that's terrifying, but I think that's what's coming. Based on this and that second piece, which is... super interesting to me i understand why a bunch of companies are so excited about this because it's the first time using a computer has felt different for people right the the jump from
the command line to the graphical user interface felt different and you built an entire paradigm of computing around it and then the jump from desktop computers to touchscreen mobile phones was an entire paradigm shift and obviously phones could go with you and all the other stuff
But that created an entire economy. And they've been searching for something else that makes computers feel different to people. Are they going to fold? You know, like, well, it's something. It's got to be something. And this feels different to people because they're just talking to them.
But there's not an application layer behind that that builds the whole economy or supports all this. And also, I just come back to this theory example. Eventually, mom's going to hit a wall, right? It's going to lie to her. She's going to make a mistake. It will embarrass her in some way.
And then we'll stop because she can't trust it. And that trust, once it's gone, is gone. Yeah, I definitely agree with that. And I think the question of A, when that happens and B, what the stakes are, is the stuff that makes me really nervous about all of this. Yeah. And either I'm just a chicken or everyone else should be more afraid or both. I don't know. All right, let's do one more and then we'll get out of here. Yeah. Here's one more.
Hey, The Verge and or the Slack channel. My name is Florian. I'm calling from New Jersey, taking up your request on what I use ChatGPT for. I would say primarily I use it as a more reliable resource than Google searches for informed decisions. So whether that's in-depth settings menus, I can find Bluetooth. But the other ones...
I'm a recent college grad, so I've used a lot to help friends with their career growth or updating resumes, kind of like the bad code, good code argument. I come back for practical advice, namely... curious topics or other things like that to gain some information on very quickly. But I would say primarily it's for things like when I can't find the answer on AV forums for how to set up the Blu-ray player through ARC with the sound bar and making sure that Dolby True HD plays from my disc.
Neil, I don't know if it's for you, but thanks for the great pod and hopefully someone in the Slack sees this. Have a great day. I love you. I love this man. First of all, just call me. You're going to talk to Robot? I'm around. Yeah, this is why the Vertcast exists. We will solve these problems for you. That's great. The in-depth technical problem, the issue that I've always run into with that is the answer is buried in some forum posts from six years ago, and it's just been muddled.
And I actually want to find the old forum post where the person actually has the answer, not the... Do you know what I mean? Not the synthesis over time. This is where I think Reddit answers, the Reddit AI search is actually super exciting because it is geared toward that exact thing. That is like, what if we just...
did a smarter job of searching this stuff but we're still interested in finding actual people's actual answers it's like that's a that's a cool mix if we can figure out how to do it right i lied i have one more to play for you and then we should go to break but let's just i just want to say
to to my guy you're my best friend we don't know each other but we're in it now you are one of us we're family welcome to the verge all right i got one more true hg for life this is matt from springfield missouri I was just answering your question about using AI daily. All these tools came out when I started dating, and I used it to help write my profile and also compose my messages.
I'm a machinist. I have good ideas, but I'm not good at words. And AI helped me fill that gap. It must have worked because now I'm in a relationship. I'm going to have a son this year, and I still use AI today. composed thoughtful messages to send to her throughout the week. Oh, this is great. AI is good, Neelai. I gotta say, I mean, that's, we just got it there. We should shut down the verge. Negative Nancy is good out of here. That's fast. That one made me really happy.
It's actually only hit two years ago. We went from zero to sun. Killing it. Pretty good. Yeah. Pretty good. Pretty good. You know, most people move in together. I'm just saying. Anyway. Not anymore. This is an AI world we live in. No time for that. Okay, I'll give you mine, and it's very different than that, but it's in the same zone.
I recently sold something on eBay, and I let eBay's AI just write the description for me. Really? Just gave it. It was so dumb. It was like we bought a new stove, and we bought different color handles for the stove, so I sold the old ones.
and i just took a picture and i figured out what it was and i'm like do you want to write a description it's like this is the lowest stakes in the world like anybody who's searching for replacement stove handles and sees a picture of this like they know like that you don't have to describe them very much i was like fine here's some copy
And it did it. Poshmark today actually announced that they're letting people do AI descriptions. I think there's this world in which like weird low stakes fields get filled in. Obviously dating is a higher stakes field, but I can, I can see why it's. Very tempting to people. Yeah. And by the way, that's a great story. Yeah. Matt, congrats. We're very happy. I hope you name your son Al. Think about it. All right. We should take a break and we got a lightning round.
That was great. Send us more of those. Yeah, thank you to everybody who wrote in. It was super fun. I learned a ton. This has been really enlightening and interesting. And I do want to make sure our coverage is rounded out. All right, we're going to take a break. We'll be right back. All right, we're back. Unsponsored lightning round. That's how you know it's wild. It's crazy times out there. Unfiltered. Uncensored. The first moments back, people. And by back, we mean...
Trump will arrest you if you criticize him. All right, there's actually a lot in this lightning round. Let's start with some very exciting, very niche Vergecast news. Google is open sourcing the Pebble source code, this original smartwatch. And Eric Minjikowski, the founder of Pebble, is going to make another watch. David, you like talk to him. What's going on here? Yeah. So I saw Eric at CES. We had lunch and he had a pebble on his wrist. And I said.
uh we were just talking about you know life and the future and gadgets and i was like i was like so you you've left automatic he sold his company beeper the messaging app that we talked about a bunch to automatic last year he left the company looking for something to do i was like so are you gonna are you gonna just like do
pebble again are you gonna re-pebble uh and little did i know he asked me again we talked this past week and he was like did did you know and i was like what are you talking about and he was like we're calling it re-pebble Why did you say that? So I'm feeling very proud of myself, except that I completely let him off the hook and just moved on to something else. But anyway, so Eric, I guess over the last year, has been working with Google.
to open source all of pebble os so pebble sold to fitbit which sold to google and a lot of the like pebble ideas sort of percolated around those two companies and you can see some dna in like the pixel watch but the pebble software itself was just not being used. And so Google, to its credit, I cannot report that Dieter Bohn was involved, but I also believe in my heart that Dieter Bohn was involved. Dieter, famous Pebble fan.
works for Google now. Sometimes there are pieces there. But anyway. Look, we don't do conspiracy theories here except for that one. Except for that one. And Google agreed to do it. So Google open-sourced all of Pebble OS, which is not... There are third-party drivers and stuff that are occasionally complicated to open source. The name Pebble still belongs to Google. But functionally, all of the software is now available. And so Eric is starting a company.
that will not be called Pebble, but the goal is just to make Pebbles again. He's like, we got it right. uh his pebbles now still work he said he had to replace the battery on all of them but they still work and they still do the things he wanted and so he's like i'm gonna keep making these like long lasting e-ink gadgety gadgets to put on people's wrists and the plan is hopefully to start
making stuff quickly, like even this year. And there are a lot of Pebble nerds out there who are very excited about this. So the Pebble story, as I recall it, is that they just ran into API problems with the iPhone. Because the original Pebble could get notifications. Right. Like Apple supported sending notifications out that way. But you couldn't reply to a message. Like they were just limited in very real ways. You could just like look at a text message and begin to get your phone.
Apple's never going to open that up. No. So, probably Android phones. The Pebble app on the Android phones, they could do some of that stuff. It was always much better, yeah. There's more to do on Android. But also, I think for... Eric in particular, I think the idea of it being like a messaging machine seems to be less compelling. He's very into it as like, it's an easy way to get kind of glanceable information.
But it's also like simple and the battery lasts a long time and it has buttons for music controls. Like buttons for music controls is one of the specific things he named as like a core competency of Pebble. And it does not have to be a messaging system, which I actually kind of agree with.
I would like lots of features to exist, but I find that I only use a very small number of them on my wrist and I would trade a lot of them for like five day battery life. And I think it's going to be interesting to see what they do this time. I'm excited. I love a good open source hardware hacky project. It's going to be cool because there's been a pretty big community of people keeping this stuff alive for a long time. And the fact that now they have...
honest to God software to play with instead of like hacking around the edges of existing pebbles. I think we're going to see some pretty interesting stuff here like that. That community is really engaged and I think is going to get up to some stuff. OK, so that's Pebble.
Next one. Oracle and Microsoft reportedly in talks to take over TikTok. This story makes me so tired. Although Trump denied Oracle, right? In some press conference. But he doesn't know. I mean, like when I say he doesn't know, I don't just mean. be dismissive i mean literally he gave them a 75 day illegal extension which apple and google do not trust enough to put tick tock back in the store
And then at a press conference, he said, Congress has given me 90 days, which is 15 more days than he gave himself. Yeah. Congress has not given him 90 days. Congress didn't give anybody anything. The time's up. Like what he gave TikTok was a 75 day pause on enforcement of breaking the law, which again, Apple and Google did not trust because that's billions of dollars.
Anyway, so I'm just saying, like, the facts are confusing on the ground. Like, what does Trump even believe is going on here? Because he's just saying different numbers. And then he did say, I don't think Oracle's involved, which is weird. But Microsoft was a bit of the first time. Nadella famously said it was like the weirdest deal he's ever been a part of. Yeah, a bidder might give Microsoft too much agency in that. It seems a lot like Microsoft was like dragged into a room and yelled at.
about buying tiktok for a while uh no one knows what's going to happen like truly no one knows what's going to happen and then this other plan uh, that Trump keeps floating where someone does a joint venture and they give 50% of it to United States. Uh, our own big tech companies are extremely nervous about that plan. Oh, interesting.
Uh, because if you just think about it, that means India could shut down YouTube and demand it gets sold and 50% of YouTube be given to India. Like that's a precedent you do not want to play with. Interesting. Yeah. Because other governments are way less skittish about nationalizing companies or doing speech regulations. Everyone's like, don't play this game. Right. We'll see. It's actually a particularly interesting one in that it is.
government that I think would be excited to do that kind of thing and is such a crucial market. Yeah. As a growth engine for so many of these companies. Oh, yeah. I picked it. India has banned TikTok. Yeah. Straight up. And it is very reliant on YouTube, but it has very draconian speech policies. The Modi government does not enjoy dissent in very specific ways.
uh you could see brazil another country like that russia exists you know like there's a million countries that would play these games uh and so like our own big tech companies like do not you do not want to open this door you're already in 50 to different trade wars like don't do this um is it possible that the door is opened now that just someone has said it out loud like do you wonder if there are a bunch of
people sitting around in like government boardrooms being like, how did we never think of this? They do. But like, if you want to roll up on the United States that way, the United States would be like, no. Fair. Yeah. But then the United States starts doing it, and they're like, okay, tit for tat. Here we go. We're off to the races. The norm has been shattered because we're doing trade wars. You can already see it. You can see people being like, we don't know what's going to happen.
But don't do that one. We'll see if any of that goes through. We'll see if there's a buyer. We'll see what happens at 75 days. Like 75 days is not a long time to close a deal of this magnitude. No. Even if you had agreed on it already, it would be a short amount of time. Right. And so far as we know, there's no lead buyer. And then there's the big question of, are you selling TikTok US or are you selling ByteDance? And there's a lot of chatter that the answer is they're going to sell ByteDance.
And so that's a much bigger deal. Right. With a much different set of investors, one of whom is Jeff Yass, Trump donor, you know, like a lot of his money is set up in ByteDance, not TikTok US. and then there's the question of like what does control mean because the law specifies it can't be under the control of a foreign adversary power and then trump is supposed to run an interagency process to blah blah blah blah blah
Okay. Is he going to do that? So there's just, I don't know, man. I think we're going to run to the end of that 75 days, and then we're all just going to look at each other, and it's, who knows? It really does seem like... at the end of day 74 we're still going to look around and everybody's going to be like what happens now and yeah no one is going to know like that it feels like that's where we're headed and that is gonna you know not that trump isn't running into
the separation of powers problem every single day but you get to day 74 and he's like i'm extending it again a bunch of republican senators are gonna say no no no no no Tom Cotton is going to be like, no, here's what we're going to do. We're going to shoot TikTok in the street. That's where he's already at. And so, yeah, we're just barreling towards a full sail of ByteDance.
which is nuts to contemplate with the permission of the Chinese government. ByteDance, probably either the first, second, or third most valuable startup on Earth right now. Yeah. By April. And by the time you're listening to this, it will be very close to February. Like, this is just not going to happen. It's crazy to me.
Yeah, I really like we were we were on the show for a couple of weeks trying to like handicap possibilities. And I have given up even trying to guess like I couldn't possibly begin to make an educated guess about what's going to happen here, which is so interesting and also so insane. I do think there's some reasonable likelihood that Microsoft actually goes through with this and tries to do it. They have the money to do it. They have the ability to run the infrastructure. They have Azure.
they have a consumer market with xbox users like they have a thesis for why they would run it they have an advertising business it's fine not great like sure Meta can't do it for sure. Can't do it for all the reasons we can talk about. But like, you know, the FTC is still pursuing a breakup. Like they're not going to do it. Would buying ByteDance be the biggest acquisition in history?
Companies worth upwards of $300 billion is the number that keeps being floated around. I don't know if the number is. But then I've heard numbers for TikTok that are higher than $300 billion. ByteDance, by the way, also kind of in the deep seek race of... putting out much cheaper AI models that can be like, there's a lot happening in that company. There's not having a company. Also just the, the chatter that I've heard is the number of changes based on who buys it.
Right. So like if Meta or Google buys it, for example, they have gigantic monetization engines that are really, really good. So they don't have to spend any money like.
getting their money back out. Sure. Right. They just have to deliver ads inside of TikTok and they already have the clients and they already have the tech and they already have the, yeah, like whatever it is that you think they need, they've already, they already have it. It's just really expensive scale, essentially. Yeah. They just bought more scale. If you are Amazon even.
You got to go build an entire monetization system. So you're going to pay a lower price because you got to allocate some money to that stuff. So like how much you're willing to pay, how much it's worth is all based on what you can do with it. And there's only so many companies like and the two companies that could do the most of the most are not going to do it because the government's trying to break up. Yeah.
So like literally they're trying to break up Google. Google has to sell Chrome, but can have TikTok. It's like a very funny outcome. It's nuts. All right, on to the next one. This is a new segment that you're going to have to get used to in the Vergecast for the next four years. I'm just calling it Brendan Carr is a dummy. It's a podcast within a podcast. He's a moron. He is a...
Total political hack job with no conviction and no morals. That's my belief. Brandon, if you're listening, you can come on Decoder and you can try to prove me wrong, but good luck, buddy. He doesn't even have a cool mug. If you're going to be terrible at this job, at least have a funny mug. You know, Ajit Pai, he was a guy. He was also a character in the first Trump administration. He had a governor. Like, there was a line of depravity that he would not cross. Fair.
Like you could be like, I disagree with this irritatingly Verizon captured conservative Republican commissioner. Brendan is just a political animal. Yeah. Here are two examples. this week, and they're just going to happen every week because the man loves attention. He is rolling back a rule that allowed people who live in apartment buildings to go get their own internet service.
So like a lot of apartment buildings, your landlord would be like, I'm just going to sign everybody up for whatever ISP, Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, whatever. And all of you have to use it and you can't go get your own. And because I have.
collected us all up together i'm going to get a deal right we have we have some scaling and the isps if you've experienced this you're like i don't what like it's just the same number as everything else right you're not getting a deal you're just being lazy or you're getting a kickback from the isp and you're not passing that on like this was my experience in an apartment in chicago is my experience apartment in new york like same yeah a lot of people have had this experience yep biden fcc
Passes a rule, says you cannot do bulk billing. You have to increase competition and let people sign up for their own ISPs and apartments. Brendan Carr has revoked this rule, and his argument is this will lower prices. Which just on its face doesn't make any sense. It's one of those things that I can't even make the bad faith argument that that makes sense.
You know what I mean? Here's a quote. I have ended the FCC's consideration of a Bryden-era proposal that could have increased costs by 50% the price that some Americans living in apartments pay for internet service. This is regulatory overreach and would have artificially raised the cost of internet service. There is not a world. in which letting people choose their service provider raises a price. There might be a world. I mean, you could choose the more expensive one.
in which you live in an apartment building that's so big, then you have a landlord that's so good that maybe they were negotiating a terrific rate. I don't know anybody who lives in an apartment building like that. There's one of those in America, and that's the one that Nagar is talking about. Yeah. I'm like, what does this mean by a political animal? He's straight up saying reducing your experience of broadband competition will lower prices. Yeah. It's ridiculous.
All right, what was the other one? You said there were two. Pure doublespeak. All right. Well, there's two, actually. There's two other ones. The second one is he's reopened investigations into NBC, ABC, and CBS's broadcast licenses. It was very complicated because the... have them, not the networks, but so it goes. And in particular, he opened up the NBC one because he says they violated the equal time rule by having Kamala Harris and Tim Kaine on Saturday Night Live. Oh, right.
Do you remember this? This was like last fall that he got all fussy about it. Yep. Yeah. So on her way out the door, Biden's FCC chair, Jessica Rosenworcel, just like wipes out these investigations. She's like, these are stupid. I know they're politically motivated. We're not doing this. He's reopened them. Whatever. You can say whatever about two of them. They're done. But in particular, the NBC one, he knows that NBC complied with the rule because he has emailed people and said that they have.
This is such a brazen lie. Right? He's like, they had her on. They complied with the rule. Here's their notice. And then immediately had Trump on a NASCAR race the next day because they gave the proper notice and the campaign took advice. advantage of it he know i know he knows it because i've seen the email and he's reopened it to be like i'm investigating like this is just total political theater it's just yelling yeah and this is dangerous first amendment territory
I don't like this speech, so I will cost you money is not what you want. Any government, it doesn't matter if you like Kamala Harris, you love Donald Trump, you hate one, it doesn't matter. Unelected bureaucrats saying I will cost this money. I will make this painful because I don't like your political speech is red flashing warning light of free speech problems. And then on top of that.
Just as we sat down to record, Carr announced investigations into NPR and PBS. Because he says they are illegally advertising. And what he specifically means is that they do fundraisers. And so... His line is taxpayers should not pay for commercial activity. And then, you know, the usual garbage about woke Sesame Street or woke NPR. He's attacking NPR in particular because.
the ceo of npr is katherine r who used to run wikipedia and the conservatives hate wikipedia right now and so this is just brendan carr trying to chill speech right he's like i will defund pbs and npr because they because i've constructed a legal reality in which them doing fundraising drives or saying we're supported by viewers like you who call us to give us money is advertising for an agenda. Right. And all of that is transparently nonsense.
But it maybe doesn't matter because he's in charge. It doesn't matter in in like the alternate reality of X where this man is trying to build a profile. And I'm like, if he, Brendan, I know you pay attention to us. You have for years. You want to come on Decoder and explain this like craven political bullshit when you are playing with the absolute fire of the First Amendment and claiming you're doing it. Come on. I'll talk to you.
But it's not going to be easy because I think this stuff is incredibly transparent. Yeah. I also, this is not important in the scheme of things, but like if you find yourself against Sesame Street, like in any way, business.
politics, like if you're canceling Sesame Street or you're mad at it, like you've done something wrong. Like just, it's not good. You shouldn't be against Sesame Street. That's it. That's all I have to say. Sesame Street is great. It's pretty straightforward. Leave Sesame Street alone. I will stop. It's lightning round. We got to move on. Yeah. Oh, but I have another super fun, deeply craven political speech thing. Do you want to talk about it real fast? Love it. My favorite. Meta agreed to pay.
25 million dollars to settle the the trump suit over suspending his account after january 6th uh which is just like in a sea of mark zuckerberg nakedly sucking up to trump for business reasons this is the simplest one yet like here's a bunch of money please be nice and then there was some reporting that uh trump was basically like i think what he said is like we have to settle this lawsuit before i can like bring you into the into the fold i think he called it the nest into the nest uh and
And it's just like this was the price of admission, right? Like this is what happened at the inauguration. They all spent a bunch of money to hang out with him and go to parties and he would say nice things. And now Metta is just spending another $25 million to make Donald Trump like them because. That is worth it. Can I just say why this one is like particularly galling to me? Meta would have definitely won. Right. The theory of this case is that Meta, when it banned Donald Trump.
was somehow the government and that violated Trump's First Amendment rights. Right. Which is nonsense. Which is nonsense for the very simple reason that the president at the time metabanned Trump from its platform was Trump. Yeah. He was the government, it turns out. Yeah. He was super the government. Like, you don't even have to get to the, like, pedantic forum stuff of, like, the First Amendment is about the government, not slashed up. Like, I can do that all day.
I was raised in that fire. I'm just saying this one is particularly stupid because you're like meta acting on orders from the government who was me illegally banned. Yeah. It's so stupid. He's lost other versions of this case, but there's other cases that he would have. ABC settled one. Disney ABC settled one.
They're just trying to get out of the line of fire because he controls the regulatory agencies. All these companies have decided it's worth the money. And the thing is, they're right. I would say pretty transparently, you can make the case that this is just a good...
Use of $25 million for meta, which is a sneeze has a lot of complicated cases going on. There are antitrust questions about meta. Trump has threatened to throw Mark Zuckerberg in jail a bunch of times. Like, I can see why you write this check. It just sucks. Like, it just sucks so much that this is the state of things right now. I mean, yeah, the FTC is going to try their antitrust case to break up metas coming. The various teen health cases about.
instagram causing mental health crises across the country they're all coming up you can if you have an angry trump who's like break him up and you can get out of that for 25 million dollars yeah yes there's a ruthless cynicism here yeah But man, we are just playing with fire with the First Amendment right now. Like, left and right. We are doing weird speech regulations and claiming to do them in the name of free speech. Weird. Super weird.
Yeah. All right. We got to end with a happy one. Blue sky. Yeah. I'm happy Blue Sky's working. I'm all in on Blue Sky. Wait, just the concept of Blue Sky? Blue Sky now has 30 million users. I was like, there's news, right? Not just knowledge like I logged into Blue Sky. It's growing. Threads is much bigger. Threads continues to add a million people a day. It has 320 million is the number Mark Zuckerberg gave on the earnings call this week. That's a gigantic number.
But Blue Sky is the fun one now. I think we can say pretty certainly that Blue Sky has replaced... Twitter as the place that is fun to hang out. And it is true. It's a bunch of like liberals being annoying to each other. Super annoying. But in addition to that, this is a group of people who does not love jokes. No. Yes. At least that's my experience. But like.
A, I'm psyched that there are multiple versions of this thing that are succeeding. I think it would have been a bummer if we had just replaced Twitter with one thing. The fact that there are a few different cuts at this that are going to work. is really exciting. Mark Zuckerberg also made noise about wanting to make the OG Facebook experience come back, which that's not going to happen. Like, sorry, Mark, you ruined that 15 years ago. But like...
Blue sky, man. Blue sky, I think has hit like escape velocity in that this thing is going to work and it's here. People are building stuff on the protocol. People are using the app. It's coming. Yeah. I don't remember what, but they're doing it. I would say I'm a blue sky person. My harshest criticism of blue sky is for all the promises of that protocol and how open it is. There's not one other server. No, there's not. But there are people building, somebody built a cool.
blue sky app that just looks like Instagram and it just takes photo posts like that's cool that's the Fediverse baby give me weird ideas about how to look at blue sky I'm in yeah but that's all just like API front end views listen I want One other place to log in. One thing at a time, man. I want to post. Maybe that's going to be the verge.com. You said good news. Let's end on good news. Okay, good news. We're happy. The Fediverse is around.
I like it. I do like it. I do love an open source, weird pebble hack. And I do love a weird band of misfit, decentralized social media hackers. That's the good stuff. Hell yeah. That's the rebel stuff. Well, you know, the bad thing happens. That's what we want. Send us more, this is your, send us more weird rebel technology. Right? That stuff. That's your homework for this week and we'll play the voicemails next week. Love it.
All right, that's it. We're way over time. That's the Verge Cast. Bye, Colonel. And that's it for the Verge Cast this week. And hey, we'd love to hear from you. give us a call at 866-VERGE-11. The Vergecast is a production of The Verge and the Vox Media Podcast Network. Our show is produced by Will Poore, Eric Gomez, and Brandon Kiefer. And that's it. We'll see you next week.