Theda Skocpol on how political scientists think differently about politics - podcast episode cover

Theda Skocpol on how political scientists think differently about politics

Mar 01, 20161 hr 3 minEp. 5
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

Political science is a misunderstood discipline. It's often laughed off by people who think it's ridiculous that something as human and contingent and unpredictable as politics can be called a science. Chemistry is a science. Politics is a hobby. Politics isn't chemistry. But it is something that can be studied rigorously, and understood using models, evidence and testable theories. In this episode, Theda Skocpol, a political scientist at Harvard (and a former chair of the American Political Science Association!) explains how political scientists learn about politics, what makes their work different both from pundits and from each other, and how it's helped her understand this insane election. She also talks through some of her research on what really drives the tea party and the ways in which the Koch Brothers are setting up an organization that's almost become a shadow political party of its own. Don't miss it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Theda Skocpol on how political scientists think differently about politics | The Gray Area with Sean Illing podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast