Was Nero Really That Bad?

Today's sponsor is Chime, a fee-free banking app changing the way people bank. Chime unlocks smarter banking for everyday people with products like MyPay, which can give you access to up to five hundred dollars of your paycheck anytime, and you can even get paid two days early with direct deposits. No more overdraft fees, minimum balance fees, or monthly fees, plus Chime makes your everyday spending work harder by delivering real rewards and financial progress.

You can even earn up to 3.5% APY on savings. That's eight times higher than a traditional bank. And they also just launched their Chime card, which is a cashback card that helps you build credit with your own money. I wish stuff like this had been around when I was younger. I wish they'd had services like this. But whatever age you are, it's not too late to build credit.

Which we all know is very important. Chime is not just smarter banking, it's the most rewarding way to bank. Join the millions who are already banking fee free today. Takes just a few minutes to sign up. Head over to chime.com slash stoic. Chime dot com slash stoic.

Chime is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services, a secured Chime visa credit card, and my pay line of credit provided by the Bank or Bank NA or Stride Bank NA. My pay eligibility requirements apply, and credit limit ranges twenty dollars to five hundred dollars. Optional services and products may have fees or charges. See Chime.com slash fees info. Advertised annual percentage yield with Chime plus status only. Otherwise, 1.00% APY applies. No minimum.

Chime card on time payment history may have a positive impact on your credit score. Results may vary. See Chime dot com for details and applicable terms. Welcome to the The daily stone. Four key Stoic Virtues courage, discipline, justice, and wisdom into the real world.

There are very few people for whom the name Nero brings up positive associations. It's a name that At this point, it has almost entirely negative connotations, right? There's even that famous expression, right? Fiddling while Rome burns.

which is a burn laid at the feet of Nero, that during the fire of Rome Nero supposedly fiddled and watched it all happen, that this is what bad leaders do, this is what indifferent, cruel, uncaring people do Even in the ancient world there were rumors that that Nero set the fire on purpose to clear out undesirables so he could build a bigger palace.

Now why does Nero have such a terrible reputation and is it deserved? I think we can all concede that a lot of what we know about Nero, and this is true for a lot of historical figures, including Seneca, who worked for Nero, a lot of what we know about him comes from people who didn't like him. Enemies, critics, historians writing after he was dead, who who maybe had political agendas. So so does Nero get a fair shake, right? Was he the villain that history has turned him into?

Actually this was a question that Smithsonian Magazine wrote about at length in twenty twenty. The article I I remember reading it when it came out. It said, The new nicer Nero. Aaron Powell And basically the the article challenges this reputation of Nero as a self-indulgent tyrant who again fiddled while Rome burned. And and they they claim that most of this reputation was shaped by hostile ancient sources.

Tacitus and Suetonius, and then of course the Christians who were opposed to Nero, uh, because of his cruel treatment of them. And then later that this reputation was continually reinforced in each subsequent generation in novels and plays and films, like for two thousand years. this guy, who certainly wasn't perfect, but perhaps wasn't as bad as people said, was turned into a caricature of a caricature of a caricature.

And and there are no shortage of modern scholars, namely John Drinkwater, who uh wrote a book called Nero, Emperor and Court, who claim that much of what we've been told about Nero is exaggerated or misleading. If you go out into the street and ask someone to name a Roman Emperor, Perhaps. It's almost certain that they'll say Nero, and most people just won't know why. He's become such a character that he's just an epitome of evil.

What has struck me in r in researching Nero is that people love evil. There's no doubt about it. And if you want a really bad, nasty character, this is Nero. The question is, really, do professional Roman historians believe this anymore? I mean it's out there Do professional historians really believe it? Can we say it's true? And the answer is no. Very little of it is in fact true. So this popular Nero is is not the Nero we know.

And it is because of the way that the science of ancient history developed. that was this picture I'm giving you is the picture of a group of ancient sources. There are some Roman sources, Latin sources, Greek sources, but there are also Christian sources and Jewish sources. And these sources combine to give this hugely negative picture of Nero. Now what modern historians have done, like whether people like it or not, is to look at this information and to look at it uh forensically.

to pre pretend that these these sources, the authors of these sources are in court. And so you start probing Why are they saying this? And the answer is really that they are biased in many ways. The main Latin and Greek sources, uh their names are Tacitus, Letonius, and Cassius Dio. They all come from a particular level of society. They're all aristocrats. The Roman aristocrats were against this system that Nero was head of anyway, and to some degree they've all suffered from it.

So they don't like anyone in Nero's position. And it doesn't matter if it was just Nero, that they're against anyone who's in the top position. I think once this bad Nero is in circulation, you can't get rid of it. My wife and I often discuss what makes a classic. And the classic is something, a novel in particular, or a play or a film, that wants

It's there, can be distorted in any number of ways. I mean, there are a number of ways that Alice in Wonderland has been portrayed. I mean there are ways for kids, there's some very dark ways for adults. the umpteen ways in which Sherlock Holmes has been portrayed, right? Once this this model is in circulation, people can do with it what they want, and this Nero model, the evil Nero,

is so useful. I mean he's attractive in a this curious way because people love to hate. He can be used as a model of the tyrant.

And the different sources, you know, as they're trying to rehabilitate Nero's reputation or trying to mitigate some of the claims, they'll come at it from a couple of angles, like Okay, maybe he was poorly suited for the role, but not like a psychopath. That he was a young man thrust into power and and most young emperors didn't do a good job. Or they'll say that, you know, he actually did a great job allowing competent administrators to govern the empire while he focused on his interests.

Uh they'll they'll try to break down each of the individual crimes that have been blamed on him and try to knock down this one or that one. Maybe they'll even point to the fact that he responded apparently decently well to the Great Fire of sixty four AD, that he organized relief efforts, that there were some reforms after, and, you know, they'll point out that he wasn't actually

fiddling. And then they'll look at some of the political murders like his brother and his mother, and go, well, he wasn't the only one. And in fact, Athenodorius and Arius Didymus, as I talk about in Lives of the Stoics, had Octavian, the first emperor of Rome, get rid of his half brother Caesarean. So they're saying that Nero is not a monster or a saint, but a complex historical figure whose reputation was shaped by these hostile historical facts, rather than by like the actual evidence.

And look, I myself have piled on to Nero over the years. We did a YouTube video in 2024 about narcissistic leaders and why they always fail in the end. And this is what I said about Nero. biographer uh of power, Robert Carrow talks about how power doesn't corrupt. Yeah. It does is it revealed.

reveals. And what we see in Nero is not like the easy narrative of Nero is that he is corrupted as he gives power, but it's it's actually more a process of the varnish coming off, the real Nero emerging. As Nero stops listening. His mother as he dispatches anyone and everyone who could tell him what to do to real near. comes out. And it's not a competent Nero. It's not a open-minded Nero. It's a delusional. It's a vain. It's an egotistical Nero. And thus his

collapse and his descent into evil was in this way inevitable. One of the things that power reveals about Nero is is something that's very true about most egotistical people, which is they're actually beneath what seems like confidence, profoundly insecure and paranoid. And Nero is perhaps believing somehow not legitimately the emperor

Perhaps knowing that he is hopelessly outmatched and unqualified for this job. And then the very real dangers of of having things that other people want. Nero is paranoid that people are out to get him. And slowly but surely he He creates circumstances in which he's able to get rid of his enemies, including his own mother, whom who he assassinates. He finds her unbearable, so he gets rid of her. He gets rid of uh a distant cousin because

You know, uh he hears of a a meteor or a comment and he takes this as a sign that this guy's out to get him. I mean he's just wildly exaggerating all these dangers and As he gets rid of potential challengers after challenger, Seneca has to remind him, he says, you know, Nero, it's impossible for you to eliminate every one of your successors. He was making a ultimately a a a very basic stoic point that we all die eventually and someone takes our place.

But it's when his paranoia is empowered by his position, when suddenly he has the power of life and death over people, that he begins to leave this immense trail of bodies behind him. stomach the idea of anyone uh one day replacing them, even though inevitably, invariably that was going to happen anyway. Although some Christians would later blame Nero for starting the great

Great fire of Rome. He probably didn't, and he probably didn't fiddle while it burned. But like all, you know, incompetent overmatched leaders, Nero is not able in the moment of a crisis. to do the job, right? He's not able to properly direct fighting of the fire. And then once it's done, he uses this as a pretext

For these enormous and vain building projects that he'd long have in mind. And instead of also taking responsibility for having screwed up, instead of using a tragedy to bring people together, you know. He scapegoats the Christians and begins a a wave of persecutions that would last for for hundreds of years. You really see, as Robert Green was saying, a leader's true character in a crisis. And you see ultimately what a fragile, weak and

scared little man Nero was. There is this whole group of Stoics that would become known as the Stoic Opposition. And they find Nero to be repugnant. Although Seneca fancies himself the adult in the room, the the moderating influence on Nero, the other stoic Stoics like Gaius Plautus, Thracia, Helvidius. There's a number of Stoics who just refuse to go along with Nero. They defy him, they are what you might call

The resistance. Nero just can't handle anyone not rubber stamping what he is doing. He can't stand that there's anyone or anything that disagrees with him, that wants to challenge him. And so they get locked in this cycle of conflict. He doesn't like that there's a a stoic named Agrippinus who has a sort of hereditary hatred of emperors, Tacitus tells us.

He just doesn't like that that Agrippinus won't come to his parties. He just he can't wrap his head around people not wanting to celebrate and love him. He thinks this is something he's entitled to rather than Elvidious, uh, one of the Stoics is banished for having said something positively about Brutus, the killer of Caesar. Nero takes this somehow indirectly as a threat. Paranoia is just

Spitting him out of control. Ultimately, Nero is just incompetent. He just doesn't have the stuff. This is the problem with hereditary rulers, but he doesn't do the work to be qualified to do this job. He doesn't take it seriously. and as he's piling up bodies after body of of critics of his regime, there's a a story about one conspirator against Nero who's put to death and as he

stares out into the grave they're about to throw him in. He says, Ugh, this too is not up to code. It was an embodiment of everything that was wrong with Nero. It's not just that he was cruel. That he was bad at being in charge. Nero's greatest enemy is this.

Thracia. Justice and reality that He tries to be good at his job, and this inevitably puts him on a collision course with Nero. He's the guy that says this is not normal, that there's something wrong with this guy, that this doesn't make sense. And so when Nero wants to shower his new wife with honors

Thracia doesn't want to go along with it. When Thracia saw corruption, he called it out. But this was in parcel of what Nero wanted on what his regime sat on. And so they were inevitably going to be enemies. Nero's Sycophans whispered that he has to kill Thracia. He says the country in its eagerness for discord is now talking of you, Nero, one man whispered into his ear. They're talking of you and Thracias at once talked of Caesar and Cato. Cato was a hero and and Nero couldn't.

handle a hero existing, so he has to get rid of him. Nero expresses his displeasure to Thracia. He expects him to throw himself at him, beg to be forgiven. In instead, Thracia says, if you think I'm guilty of something, name your charges. accuse me out in the open. And ultimately they bring Thracia up on these false charges and he Executed. We're told that some of his last words are Nero can kill me.

But he cannot harm me. Meaning that he refused to be corrupted by and degraded by Nero, even though Nero did have the power and life of life and death over him. But as it does for all gangsters and tyrants and bullies. Eventually the support for Nero erodes and it erodes slowly and then all at once. Ultimately Nero has to kill Seneca as well and he sends goo.

to to to dispatch the man who had raised him, basically like a son. And as everyone wept and cried in in Seneca's house, Seneca stopped him and he goes, Why is this surprising to you? He said, Who knew not Nero's cruelty? He said, Look at all the other terrible things he's done to people close to him. He said, What's left then for him to to take me out?

too. It had always been there. Who Nero was was always there. Power just enabled it. Nero had driven himself into a wicked downward spiral. He descended In to madness. And eventually the stoic opposition applies enough pressure, but of course Even at the end, Nero was a coward. He couldn't take responsibility, couldn't take ownership, he couldn't go out like a man. One of the members of the Praetorian Guard, when they're watching this cowardly, selfish man-child frantically try to

Save himself, he goes, Is it as awful as that to die? Finally, even his trusted bodyguards abandon him. Being an effective leader is difficult, right? You gotta keep your ego in check. You gotta know how your business works, how the team operates for peak effectiveness. But most leaders are making decisions about their teams based on assumptions and not reality. And that's exactly the problem that today's sponsor Scribe was built to fix.

Scribe Optimize passively captures how your team works across approved business apps, and it uses AI to automatically surface workflows, inefficiencies, and improvement opportunities. No interviews, no manual discovery, no extra work for your team.

Scribe is trusted by eighty thousand plus enterprises, including nearly half of the Fortune 500. Scribe Optimize follows work across every tool involved. If someone starts something at Salesforce and finishes it on a completely different tool, it tracks it the whole way.

And Optimize shows you where your biggest inefficiencies are with AI powered recommendations on how to fix them, so you're not just identifying problems, you're getting clear directions on how to improve. The kind of visibility that used to take months now is always on.

And Optimize only works on applications your admin improves so no personal activity is captured and no one's privacy is at risk. If you want to see what Optimize could look like for your organization, visit scribe.how slash stoic s-c-r-i-b-e. When you're a productive person, when you've got a lot on your plate, you don't have time to be groggy or unfocused. just because you had a couple of drinks the night before.

Cheers Restore After Alcohol Aid helps you have better mornings after drinking. You take it after your last drink or before bed, and then it works while you sleep. Their claim to fame is that you will feel 50% better or your money back. A lot of people think that dehydration is why you feel bad in the morning, but the real reason is what happens in your brain and liver while you sleep.

When alcohol leaves your system, your brain goes into rebound mode and that's what makes you feel bad. And the DHM in Shears works while you sleep to smooth out that rebound. And at the same time, the alcohol converts into a toxic byproduct that your liver has to clear out.

And the cysteine in Cheers helps speed that up. Cheers is backed by doctors, PhDs, and over a thousand verified clinician. Take Cheers Restore after your last drink or before you go to bed and wake up feeling at least 50% better or your money back. For a limited time, our listeners are getting twenty percent off their entire order at Cheershealth.com slash stoic. It's always interesting to read from a different perspective to hear.

uh what other people think and sometimes You know, uh I talk about this in the w the wisdom book, the idea of steel manning the case. So instead of letting Nero be a character, really argue a positive case for Nero. Because I think when you do that, you find, okay, some of the charges are spurious and some of the Charges are ridiculous.

But not all of them are. And when you lay it all out, I think there are some indisputable indications that he's a decent stand-in for all that is bad about bad leaders. And there are other scholars who have dived in to Nira. What made him tick? Was he really as good or bad as they think? I interviewed one on the podcast when we were just getting started. Let's start with Nero,'cause uh you seem to be the most qualified person I could ask this question, which I remain fascinated with. So

Bear with me a historical parallel. Marcus Aurelius uh loses his father when he's young. He has a very influential, strong mother influence in his life. He's then introduced pretty early on to a philosophy teachers, uh, one who who teaches him and introduces him to stoicism. As a teenager, he is put in line for the throne, and then eventually he becomes emperor. Nero loses his father early on, has a strong motherly influence in his life.

Is introduced to Stoic philosophy, set in line for the throne, and then their stories wildly diverge. What happened? I think that they're just different people. I mean the two similar lines. And underneath that and the thing about Nero is that he had a very, very problematic childhood because he had this terrible mother.

Agrippina, the mother from hell really, because sh she wanted to push him forward, push him forward and push him forward. Like those mothers who want their daughters to go to dance classes and become ballerinas. Wow. Nero decided that he didn't really like public life. What he really wanted to be was a professional musician, based above all in the cultural capital city of the Western world and Alexandria. That's what he really wanted to do.

And you can see his reign as not so much an attempt to implement uh the precepts of for stoicism, but more really, uh, to um break away from the thought which his mother had laid laid for her.

So this complicated picture of Nero is one that I think as a historical nerd, I I'm fascinated by, but I'll tell you who I was not expecting to nerd out about it with. When Bert Kreischer, the the comedian, came on the podcast, he was promoting his new show Free Bert, which was really funny, he and I were talking about stoicism and you know, I think he'd heard about it from social media and he'd heard about it from Tom Segura.

But I didn't know that he was a bit of a history nerd too, because all of a sudden we were just way down the Nero rabbit hole. And here's where that ended up going. I don't know if you know anything about Nero, but Nero Do I know anything about Nero? Are you kidding me? So Nero never never danced while while Rome burned to the ground. He didn't play the fiddle. Play the fiddle buttons. Well he didn't do anything when it burned.

No, no, no, no. So hang on. I get really hung up on Nero. Okay. So here's what happened, okay. I did not think this was gonna go in this direction. So Nero was a pretty good fucking emperor. Uh hang on. Okay. Let me just give me a. Give me your take. So he's a pretty good emperor and he lasted for a while. Yes. And the guy that came up next, he didn't really do anything and he kind of disappeared. He's like the Jimmy Carter of Emperors, right? The next guy was the Gerald Ford of Emperors.

And then the third guy, Ronald Reagan, was like, dude, we gotta let them forget about fucking Nero so I can guard my own path. So he goes, yo, let's retrofit. the f Nero fiddled while Rome burned so that we can remember him as a piece of shit. And that's what they were trying to do to George Bush scene. No, I'm kidding. But like but that's what they did to Nero so that this guy could'cause I listen I l I listen to a lot of stuff. But I d I barely taken Det seemed like he took a lot in.

And so that's what I heard about Nero. Okay, so basically Seneca is in exile. He's the Emperor Claudius is deranged, and he thinks that Seneca is having an affair with his sister. And uh so he banishes Seneca. Seneca gets sent into exile to the island of Corsica, which is off the coast of Italy. It's where Napoleon's from. So he's stuck in this rock in the middle of the ocean. He hates it.

And he finally he gets a uh a letter. You can come back to Rome. Uh it's from this woman, if you tutor my son. and that her son is Nero. So he gets called back in in exchange for for tutoring this young kid who's almost certainly gonna become the emperor one day. And and Nero's smart, Nero's promising, he's a he seems like a good kid.

Seneca teaches him everything he knows, and then Nero does become emperor. And for the first five years, he listens to Seneca and he has another military advisor named Burris who he listens to.

And so the first five years of Nero are great. They're actually known as the Quinquinium Neronis or the five golden years of Nero. But what happens is, you know, they say absolute power corrupts absolutely. The problem is Nero desperately wanted to be like And he desperately wanted to be liked as both an athlete and an artist. Yeah.

Yes, like people, it's funny, like people get the thing, you think that would be enough, but everyone wants has their secret fantasy of what they want to be. So Nero, like Talking to the guy that's on testosterone and bets three hundred twenty five pounds. Yeah, keep going. He fixes the Olympics so he can win as a chariot racer. He uh he forces people to listen to his poetry. He's delusional.

He's not that good, but he that's what he really wants to be known for. So he kind of starts to spin off the planet. And then he gets really paranoid that people are plotting against him, right? Absolute power corrupts, absolutely. At one point Seneca tells him, he goes, you know, it's it's impossible for you to to kill literally all of your successors. The point being, eventually you'll die and someone will take your place. Like you you can't kill everyone. I need a Seneca in my life.

And at at one point he kills he he assassinates his own mother. He turns against his mother. He sends her out on this crew on this boat ride and he has her killed. Um so I know about that. So so he lo he loses his mind. He he really is sh shitty and he loses his mind.

And eventually Seneca, who becomes very rich working for Nero, finally goes, Dude, I've had enough, I gotta get out of here And Nero goes, Bro, that's that's not how this works. Uh and so y he s he sends Seneca into into exile. Eventually he kills Seneca. Kills everyone. There's a there's a joke he's um he uh has one of his generals uh killed and um the general's standing on the edge of his grave right before they kill him and uh he looks down and he goes

Even this isn't up to code. Like he's like Nero sucks even at this. So he he sucks. He he's good at first, spins off the planet, sucks, and then this is where the story gets crazy, when the walls close in on him. Nero realizes he has to kill himself, but he's too much of a coward to do it. So he calls one of his advisors to do it. He botches it. He sticks the knife in and he kinda screws it up, Nero does. He calls one of his advisors and his advisor has to finish the job.

And that advisor is the owner of Epictetus. So Epictetus is watching all of this happen. He's watching not just Nero spin off the planet, but he is watching Seneca like degrade himself by being associ like Seneca writes all this great stuff about what it means to be a stoic, what it means to be a good person, and then has a day job working for a monster.

It's a fucking fascinating twisted world. And of course it's it's endlessly fascinating, and I've talked about this many times, Seneca's relationship with Nero. Was Seneca an enabler of Nero? Is he complicit in what Nero did? Or was he the adult in the room? Would Nero have been worse without Seneca's influence? And and one of my favorite

All time biographies, certainly one of my favorite books about Stoicism by James Rom, called Dying Every Day, is about Seneca's time in Nero's court. This is something he writes in that book. He says the turbulence within Nero's palace also held historic huge historical importance.

The future of a dynasty, even of Rome itself, hinged on whether a mother could get along with a son, whether a husband could stay married to his wife, whether a tutor could get his student to respect and heed him. Nero's extreme youth at the time of accession and his growing derangements afterward made the task of managing him and the failure to do so critical to the fortunes of the Empire and the world.

For the Empire, as the Romans like to believe, had by Nero's era nearly reached the confines of the world that contained it. And in fact when I had James Rom on the podcast, I've interviewed him a couple of times, but he came out to Austin. I was curious to hear his thoughts. Like w what is it with something like Nero? Are they born that way? Is it is it something like Robert Carrow says that that power reveals? Or is it created? Is it a product of circumstances? And and here's what he said.

Yes, Marcus Aurelius is the anti Nero in many ways. What's ironic is that his teachers had all learned from Epictetus. who had been present at the Court of Nero and had probably seen the disaster with Seneca, so there is a direct line of transmission really from from Seneca to to Marcus.

But the two of them are are very distinct and of course Nero and Marcus are are just antithetical, the one man who clung to his moral principles even in spite of immense duress, immense pressure, and the other who collapsed really, as soon as the opportunity for wrongdoing came around. And I wonder how much the swing vote is their mother. Mm. Because

What does he say what does he say about his mother? Marcus's description of his mother is Her reverence for the divine, her generosity, her inability not only to not do wrong, but to even conceive of doing it, in the simple way she lived, not in the least like the rich. That's basically the opposite of Nero's mother. Yes, right. And so maybe that's the swing vote. That could be, yes. The parentage. And of course Nero also lacked a father. But so did Marcus.

Well, Marcus was adopted and had a very positive role model to look up to in uh Antoninus. But um the problem of Nero uh being fatherless for really his first thirteen years And then having Seneca as a surrogate father who at that point was already, you know, almost two generations older and not a very paternal type, I don't think. Never had children of his own. So yeah, parenting was a big dividing line for those two.

That's interesting because Marcus is attached to Antoninus and Hadrian probably thinks he's gonna live for a few more years and he lives for like twenty years. Mm-hmm. And Marcus actually takes to this apprenticeship. and decides like, yeah, I don't wan wanna be emperor right away. I'm fine being the number two. Mm-hmm. And Nero is basically that's what Seneca is is set up to be, although he's not made emperor himself. And

Nero listens to him for a little bit and then stops. Mhm. I always come back to that famous Barone statue of Seneca and Nero sitting together and obviously it's not of the time, but you can see in Nero's body language some sense of what it would actually be like to have access to the potentially the wisest man of your time. and think you know more or not be interested in hearing from them. Mm-hmm. Yeah.

or to actively reject what he's telling you. The um problem of Nero's love life, right from the get go, divided Seneca and Nero, because Seneca wanted to defend the legitimate wife, Octavia, who represented the stability of the empire, the future dynasty, and the union of the two branches of the royal family. And um Nero didn't want anything to do with that. Yes. He wanted the hottie.

Yeah, it's it's at some level no one can tell the emperor what to do. But Marcus Aurelius is bound by some sense of tradition or honor or norms. And then I would say the philosophy itself, like the philosophy is telling him like Epictetus is telling Marcus what to do, in in that he has sort of laid down these precepts or these sort of ideals to aspire to and Nero has none of that. And one of them spins off the planet and the other doesn't.

Yeah, it's a fascinating study, um the place of Stoicism in the heart of the Roman Empire, in the the palace. and uh the fact that it later got banished from the palace as a threat to imperial power. Um, that too is uh is part of the story. Um that you mentioned Domitian and the exile of the philosophers from the from the royal court. Um at that point it had been determined that stoicism could not get along, could not be incorporated into the power structure.

That time of Nero is so interesting because you have all these different kind of stoic characters and they each sort of show us a different way that you respond to tyranny or dysfunction or corruption. So you have someone like Agrippinus who's kind of this like marches to the beat of his own drummer, he says, I want to be the red thread in the in the white sweater. Then you have Epictetus, who's sort of powerless inside of it and just trying to

To focus internally, you know, just how do I find freedom within myself when I am literally, you know, in chains? Then you have Seneca who's the collaborator, you know, it's sort of mitigator, martyr type. Mm-hmm. And then you have a thraci you have these other ones who are sort of more aggressively rebellious and revolutionary, I guess.

And I mean they all end up effectively in the same place, I guess the Stoics would say it doesn't b like they all they all end up not making it out alive. But there's this sort of different Different paths that you can follow, and then it's sort of left to us all these thousands of years later to say, like, which role do you want to play?

Yes, very true. And it's interesting that Marcus has become sort of our primary touchstone for Roman Stoicism and by far more popular, more widely read than either Seneca or Epictetus, and certainly more so than the the other minor figures You know, Marcus has really gripped the imagination. I think in part because of his royal power, because he was able to resist the pull into

hedonism into vice, into family murder. Of course, he did some bad things. Let's not let's not We should grade him on a curve. But we agreed him on a curve, yes, very much so. And uh compared to things he could have done and that Nero did, he comes out looking pretty good. So was Nero really that bad? I'll I'll leave it up to you. to think about. I think Nero's last words, which were uttered as he had Epictetus's owner,

Stick the knife into his neck being too afraid to do it himself. Give us a sense of the narcissism and the megalomania and the ridiculousness of this character. He said, What an artist the world loses in me. There's something kind of funny about that, not just because he wasn't a good artist. But although Nero feared the world was losing an artist with him, which again they weren't, his life has inspired and continues to inspire artists and writers and academics and creatives.

This day. I hope you enjoyed this deep dive into Nero. Let's uh talk soon.