Science Friday is supported by Progressive Insurance, whether you love true crime or comedy, celebrity, interviews or news, you call the shots of what's in your podcast queue, right? And guess what? Now you can call them on your auto insurance, too! With the name your price tool from Progressive, it works just the way it sounds. You tell Progressive how much you want to pay for car insurance, and they'll show you coverage options that fit your budget.
Here quote today at Progressive.com to join the over 28 million drivers who'd trust Progressive. Progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates. Price and coverage match limited by state law. Listener supported WNYC Studios. Did you know that almost every star in the night sky has at least one planet orbiting around it? The same can't be said for objects called rogue worlds.
A rogue world is a planetary mass object that's kind of free floats in space untethered to any star. It's Tuesday, September 3rd and you're listening to Science Friday. I'm Sci-Fi producer, Russia, a greedy rogue worlds aren't planets and they aren't stars either, but it's kind of in between objects that just drift surround in space. And with data from the James Webb Space Telescope, astrophysicists recently identified six right here in our own Milky Way galaxy.
So what can we learn from these rogue worlds? Can they teach us anything about how stars and planets are formed? Here's guest host Rachel Feldman with more. Joining me to tell us more are two of the studies authors. Astrophysicist Dr. Adam Langavelt, as well as Dr. Ray Jaiowardina, a professor of physics and astronomy. Welcome to Science Friday. Good to be here, Rachel. Yeah, thank you for having us today. Thanks so much for being here. So, Adam, what exactly is a rogue world?
So, a rogue world is kind of an object, a planetary mass object that kind of free floats in space untethered to any star. There are kind of two ways that this can come about. The first is that these rogue objects can be formed similarly to stars where there's a kind of cloud of gas and dust that gravitationally contracts and kind of forms this all this planet star like object.
But it doesn't reach the required mass to ignite fusion in its core to begin its life as a star. And then it can just, if it doesn't have enough mass, just drift in space alone behaving as a kind of a rogue floating object. The other way is that it could be formed around another star as planets do like our solar system. And so a planet like Jupiter, for example, could form in the disk around a star that's just formed as well.
And then if it is in a kind of dense cluster, for example, a dense cluster of stars that are also forming, it could interact with the gravity of another star and get ejected out of its system and just end up just floating endlessly in space. So these rogue was a very interesting kind of single objects that we can and how start to see. So path one is that a cloud of dust and gas collapses and path two is that a planet forms around a star but gets chucked out of its orbit. Is that right?
Yes, that's correct. So Ray, tell me about the six rogue worlds that you found. Where are they? So this happened to be in a nearby star cluster that itself is rather young, just a couple of million years old and it's about a thousand light years from our solar system, which means it's still very much in our neighborhood.
And thanks to the incredible sensitivity of the web telescope, particularly at infrared wavelengths, we're able to probe deeper into this star cluster and identify objects fainter than ever before possible. Do we have any idea how many rogue worlds or in science speak free floating planetary mass objects? There are in the Milky Way in total. The census of objects for this particular star cluster in GC 1333 gives us the sense that maybe 10% of the members of the cluster have planetary masses.
Our best estimate is that there are a couple of hundred billion stars in the galaxy. So if something like 10% of objects in the galaxy are planetary mass, that would get us into the billions. Wow, very cool. So Adam with so many potential rogue worlds, what makes these six exciting? So these six objects that we found in this recent study are particularly interesting since there's some of the lightest objects that we've found of this type and that is these free floating objects in space.
And now that is thanks to the real improvement and sensitivity provided by James Webb compared to any of the other telescopes that we've been able to look at these regions before. So what we find is six objects that are between five to fifteen Jupiter masses. They're kind of large, gaseous objects. And what we don't find is that there is no object below this mass. Even though our experiment and our observations were designed to detect objects down to one Jupiter mass.
And so we really think that we have found at least in the region we are looking at some of the lowest mass objects that exist in this region. And that gives us a lot of important context for star and planet formation. To build on what Adam said, in some sense what's more striking is what we didn't find. We're excited to have discovered a handful of new planetary mass objects that are free floating not circling stars down to about five times the mass of Jupiter in this star forming region.
But we did not find an abundance of even lighter objects despite the web telescope having sufficient sensitivity to do so. That suggests that if even lighter objects exist, they must be relatively rare in this young star cluster. In other words, it's intriguing to wonder if we are reaching the lowest mass objects that might form the way that stars do through the contraction of a cloud of gas and dust.
So we're getting at a very basic fundamental question, how low in mass and can an object form the way that stars do. And the idea, you know, the star formation process is quite astounding to think about. The most massive stars could be 100 times the mass of the sun.
And the lowest mass object we found here in this cluster is about five times the mass of Jupiter, the fact that nature can produce objects ranging in mass by a factor of 20,000 through a set of physical processes is rather mind boggling to consider. Yeah. And do you think that, you know, because these objects are so low mass that you might be witnessing them at the beginning of their formation?
Well, given the very youth of the cluster, we are indeed looking at these objects relatively early in their lives, the same way that stars in the cluster show evidence of youth. In fact, the lightest object we found, the five Jupiter mass object among the handful is surrounded by a disc of dust and gas itself. Tell me more about that dusty disc that you discovered on one of the rogue worlds. How does it compare to rings we might be more familiar with, like the ones on Saturn?
We would think of it as a scale down version of what our own sun started with a protoplanetary disc out of which our solar system coalesced what we see in the case of Saturn is not a primordial disk or primordial ring that we're witnessing today.
The rings of Saturn probably formed through collisions of larger bodies generating new particles. So here we are thinking about planetary mass object that was born with a disc of gas and dust surrounding it, the way we assume our own sun was born and the way we do actually observe other young stars to be surrounded by
solar disks. So I guess that's another indication that we're seeing something at a really early stage of its life. And just to make sure I have this right you're saying that because it has this disc it probably formed like a star. I guess if it had been an ejected planet any disc it might have had would have fallen apart when it got checked out into space. Is that right?
That seems likely the kind of gravitational kick that would eject such an object would also likely disrupt a surrounding disc or at least a sizable disc from being carried away with it as it got ejected. So the evidence points to that five Jupiter mass object with a disc is more likely to have formed the way that stars do.
And given that the mass is so low or it's the lowest mass object that we found with a disc again it just points to the fact that this could be the potential limits or near the limits of how light of an object can form like a star which is the big overarching question that we were trying to investigate with this work. Support for Science Friday comes from the Alfred P Sloan Foundation working to enhance public understanding of science technology and economics in the modern world.
So real worlds don't fit neatly into the box of either planets or stars and I'm curious as scientists do you find that frustrating or exciting. For me it's a great curiosity and an exciting curiosity because every day we find things that don't fit into those boxes we find wonders that make us go wow there must be some different types of things out there that we've never even imagined.
It's interesting itself because as we kind of over viewed earlier there is this overlap between those objects like this that form like planets and the objects that form like stars in terms of their masses that the masses at which these objects can be overlaps. And so trying to narrow that down and trying to narrow down their specific kind of type is very interesting for me.
The blurring of boundaries is interesting fascinating in itself but it also means that the study of free floating planetary mass objects like these can shed light on both the staff formation process but also the process of planet formation that overlap is perhaps a little confusing at first plush but it's certainly scientifically is deeply interesting and potentially. Tell us about two separate processes in nature.
Yeah very cool well and I want to ask about the image from from James Webb that accompanied your study it's so stunning you know it's the sea of orange and blue and purple with stars glittering everywhere. Adam how did you react when you first saw that. I thought it was very very beautiful it was a step by step process so we got the the initial images that need to be then kind of filtered and colored and kind of put together because they're taking in seven parts.
But once those images came together it really was a magnificent site and something that definitely made us motivated to continue to investigate and look deeper into what we see in the data in the spectrum that we get as well alongside it.
Yeah and could you explain a little bit more about how these images get put together I'm always fascinated by the creation of like these breathtaking images that are maybe not what I'd see if I just took a rocket ship there and definitely not with each individual instruments sees but yeah how does that all come together.
Yeah so firstly the image that has been kind of released under in the news articles is a is a mosaic of several kind of squares that we take in this region so firstly those have to be kind of merged together. Secondly is that we take this same image in multiple filters that is to to take the image looking at two different wavelengths such that objects appear brighter in different wavelengths.
And by doing this we can get the kind of color gradient we can apply a color to the lower wavelength and a different color for example red to the higher wavelength and by then combining those two together we get this this nice gradient in color that shows so vividly and so nicely in the final image that we see.
And remember these images are taken at infrared wavelengths not in the visible part of the spectrum and the web telescope is particularly capable of giving us a good infrared view of the universe. The beauty of the nearest instrument on web that we used for this project is that not only are we able to obtain these stunning images of a star forming region but we also get a spectrum of every object in our field of view.
That means in one fell soup we can identify out of hundreds of point sources in the field which are the most interesting which handful of faint objects are most relevant when we are exploring the lowest mass free floating objects in this new cluster. Well, and speaking of the James Webb space telescope Ray I know that you worked on the James Webb so how does it feel to work with data from the system you helped build.
It's thrilling I've been involved with a team that developed the nearest instrument for web for two decades now and this particular project of targeting a young star cluster to probe the planetary mass regime in it has been in the works for 10 years.
I remember watching with some mix of excitement and trepidation the launch of web on Christmas Day of 2021 with my two kids with so much writing on it the work of thousands of engineers scientists and others over decades and also so much potential for scientific discovery and it's truly gratifying and thrilling to see where the web telescope performing so spectacularly. And we're able to do science that simply was not within the reach of humanity until now.
Wow yeah so my last question for both of you is now that you found these real worlds what's next what else are you hoping to find out. So we're in particular trying to learn more about these free floating planetary mass objects we're targeting a handful of similar objects with evidence of dusty disks around them so we can learn about those disks determined if they're sizable which might provide clue a clue as to whether such objects formed in situ the way stars do over that they were.
In some cases they've formed as planets and were later ejected in fact we have an observing program with web that's underway now the very first data for that follow up project were taken just a week ago one thing that I would like to add to that and something that I'm very curious and interested in myself is that the nature of these objects that we do see in this region.
And I would like to try to characterize their composition for example with the nearest data that we got the instruments on JMS T we only obtain the spectrum over very narrow wavelength range which gives us a nice information but relatively limited information about their composition and so it would be great to really observe these in more detail over much wider wavelength range with other instruments on the JMS T.
To see if we can really narrow down their composition for example we might expect them to have molecules such as water carbon monoxide maybe methane. Which would really also give us a nice insight into their formation conditions as well and comparison to both exoplanets and stars and the lowest mass stars so that for me is also very interesting. Well I think that's all the time we have Adam and Ray thank you both so much for joining me. Thank you for having us. Yeah it was very nice to chat.
It's been a pleasure. Dr. Adam Lengveld is an astrophysicist at Johns Hopkins University. Dr. Ray Jaiyawardina is a professor of physics and astronomy also at Hopkins. Lots of folks help make this show happen including Jordan Smudgett. Charles Bergquist. Shishana Bucksbaum. Annie Nero. Join us tomorrow for a true crime story about eels. How a lucrative criminal enterprise has risen up to poach baby eels from the wild. For food I'm Sy Fry producer Russia Eridi.