Science Friday is supported by Progressive Now most of you aren't just listening right now, you're driving, cleaning, even exercising. But what if you could be saving money by switching to Progressive? Drivers who save by switching save nearly $750 on average and auto customers qualify for an average of 7 discounts. Multitask right now, quote today at progressive.com, progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates. National average 12 month savings of $744 by new customer
surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential savings will vary, discounts not available in all states and situations. A human-led mission to Saturn might sound cool on paper, but space psychologists have some concerns. Space is an isolated confined extreme environment, and humans are very social, and when you put that combination together, that creates a lot of stressors on them. It's Friday, August 30th. Around here, we call that science
Friday. I'm Sci-Fi producer Deeputerschmitt. There's a new Sci-Fi thriller out in theaters today, called Slingshot. It follows crew members on a year's long space mission as they start to unravel, highlighting how long lonely missions can put astronauts well-being in peril. And even though it's fiction, the film does remind us that a lot can go wrong in space, so as humans get closer to embarking on long missions to Mars and beyond, how are real space agencies thinking about
keeping them healthy and safe? We'll get into that later, but first, here's guest host and science journalist Rachel Feldman, rounding up the top news and science this week. This week, a new hampture man died of Eastern equine encephalitis, a rare but serious mosquito-borne virus. Human cases have also been reported in Wisconsin, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Vermont, prompting some municipalities to step up their mosquito control efforts, and even advise
residents to limit outdoor activities during dusk and dawn. Joining me now to talk about this and other recent science stories is Sophie Bushwick, senior news editor at New Scientist in New York. Welcome back, Sophie. Thanks for having me. Thanks for being here. So, tell me more about this virus. What is it and how concerned should we be? So, the good news is Eastern equine encephalitis is still very rare. It has killed five people in the US this year, but that is five people out of
the whole US population. So, it is definitely a concern. The problem with this disease is it has a 30% mortality rate, and it can cause permanent damage to people who fall ill with it. You know, they can have problems for the rest of their lives. So, it's absolutely a threat that we should be taking seriously, but I don't think that folks need to be living in fear necessarily. Right, that makes sense. And this isn't the only mosquito-borne disease out there, of course. In fact, last week,
we saw a disease specialist Dr. Fauci recovering from West Nile virus. That's right. A lot of these mosquito-borne diseases are actually spiking a bit alarmingly. We've also seen much higher cases of a disease called Oropush virus in South America. Brazil alone has had an 800% increase in the number of cases. And the mosquito-borne disease dengue as well. We've got almost double the cases
this year compared to last year, and last year was at a record high. Dengue can cause symptoms similar to flu, but it can also, in severe cases, cause bad bleeding that can cause shock and then death. Wow. And what do we know about why all of these are spreading? Well, for this one, we can pretty much blame climate change. Mosquitoes love warm weather. They love wet weather. So basically, if you are sweating and uncomfortable, a mosquito is going to be very happy. And climate change is not
just making their season longer. It's also making their geographic range broader. So they're able to spread into areas where maybe they wouldn't have been able to survive previously. I'm unhappy. The mosquitoes are happy. Nobody's planning. Yeah, mosquitoes love biting me and I hate being bitten, but it's unfortunately the way it is. So is there anything that people can do to protect themselves? Yes, the same measures that you take to avoid getting bitten by mosquitoes will help protect
you from mosquito-borne disease. So things like staying indoors during the time of day when mosquitoes are most active, which tends to be around dusk, that can help wearing bugs spray, wearing maybe long sleeves or pants. If you know you're going to be out for a long time, putting screens on your windows and doors is helpful. And just making sure there's no standing water around. So if you have an outdoor container that tends to get filled up with rainwater, make sure you're emptying
that out. The other option is pesticide spraying. So we tend to be very cautious about this because DDT caused a lot of problems, historically. But one option that Massachusetts is using right now is a different pesticide. It's called Anvil 10 plus 10. And they send people a warning to stay indoors during the time when they're spraying, which is very helpful for avoiding having problems with humans. Then they can spray the pesticide. It keeps down the mosquitoes and it protects folks from
mosquito-borne illness. Staying loosely on the climate topic. You have a story about something people can do to help the planet while they're behind the wheel. That's right. This is a relatively minor intervention, but it can actually make a big dent in emissions from passenger vehicles. So if you've ever been in a car with someone who goes up to an intersection, you know that different drivers have different styles. Some people like to slowly glide up to the intersection and some
people kind of accelerate all the way there and then slam on the brakes. And it turns out that the gliding technique is better. If all cars glide it up to intersections, then passenger vehicles could cut their total carbon emissions by like five to 10%. It's funny. My brother-in-law has a hybrid and is one of those people who really pays attention to his efficiency and he's been gliding all this time. How
much of a difference can this make? Is it just like a thing people can do personally? Is there a way that cities or road planners could actually take advantage of this? So one thing that's kind of cool about this is a lot of cars these days have some sort of semi-autonomous features. You know, you might have your car might help you stay within your lane or some people of their cars can kind of take over
when they're driving on the highway. But it could be programmed into smart cars like this to slow down automatically when they're approaching an intersection. It could set the pace for them. Another thing that could happen is the traffic signal. You could put a device in the traffic signal so it's communicating with the cars coming up and being like, you've got five seconds or you know, you're at
a distance where you'd have to really accelerate to make it through. So instead, why don't you slow down and glide and that way you'll have a less emissions heavy experience with this intersection? Very cool. Okay, taking a hard turn now into the world of strange physics and dark matter. I know you have a story for us about those spooky physics things. Yes, a very wimpy story for you. Wimpy as in weakly interacting massive particles or whims. So researchers know from looking at
gravitational effects that about 80% of all matter is actually dark matter. But this is a mysterious substance that doesn't seem to even interact with light, which makes it really hard for us to detect it. And so we have a bunch of different theories about what it might be and one of the leading ones is that it's a wimp. It's this all these particles that interact very weakly with regular matter and that's why we're not able to detect it. Despite that, researchers are trying to detect it.
They buried this detector about a mile underground called Lux Zeppelin. It's been running for about 280 days now and it has found nothing. Huh, yes. Is it that the particles aren't doing what they expected or they're just not looking at the right particles? What do they think is going on? So what they think is happening is just that the good news is they're able to restrict the limits of what these particles are able to do. It's sort of like one of the researchers compared this to
searching through the ocean for a magical fish. So they've been searching and they've searched about 75% of the ocean. So they know that either this magical fish is in the final 25% and they've got a better idea of where to look for it or the other possibility is that the fish doesn't exist. Wow. That's fish. That's a wimp. It's like three. Another mysterious thing, the brain during mating in fruit flies naturally. Tell me more.
Yeah. So researchers have known that when male fruit flies are going through courtship and they're getting close to mating, they seem to be unable to visually detect threats nearby. And this isn't great for fruit fly long javelin. You know, they need to be able to fly away from
those predators. So they looked at their brains while the flies were going through courtship. And what they found was that towards the beginning of courtship, the male flies would they had a they simulated a predator using light and shadow nearby and the male fly would say, Oh no, okay, I'm getting out of here. But then as the fly got closer to sealing the deal as it got closer to the mating moment, it seemed to lose the ability to detect that threat. And they found that dopamine
in the brain was increasing as the fly got closer to achieving its goal. And they think that the dopamine is just blocking some of its sensory pathways, basically forcing it to tune out all distractions as it focuses on what it wants. Wow. I mean, I guess that is kind of an evolutionary trade off. Yes, totally. So moving up a bit in size, researchers are now looking at how Marmoset monkeys address each other. Yes, Marmoset monkeys seem to use names to call each other. And
this is the first non-human primates that we've seen this behavior in. So it's very exciting. And also very cute. I would encourage folks to look up pictures of these Marmosets. They're adorable. Always good advice. And I know we actually have a sound of this. We're going to play some of these calls. But just a note, if you're listening in the car as opposed with headphones, you probably won't hear it. It's very high-pitched. We promised there is actually sound playing.
You should go back and check it out later. Oh, yeah. Wow. So what are they saying? It's almost bird likes. Yeah. Yeah, these calls are called fee calls, which I think is a nice, is an appropriate name for it. And basically the researchers recorded, took a lot of recordings like this. They took recordings of Marmosets in the lab. And
Marmosets tend to live in these close-knit monogamous family groups. So they took Marmosets from three different families and then they paired them up in different ways and listened to their calls. And then they used AI to analyze those calls and to pick out these very subtle acoustic differences in the way that Marmosets called each other. And then they played recordings of these calls for Marmosets to see how they responded. And what they found was that Marmosets make tweaks
to their calls depending on which monkey they're addressing. So they're basically encoding a specific information, which we would think of as like a label or a name in it. And different monkeys from the same family group will call a monkey with the same modulation. So like using the same name to refer to the same individual. Oh, wow. So different Marmosets have the same name for a specific Marmoset. Exactly. Yes. That's very cool. So what does this teach us? You know, why do we
care beyond the obvious? I care deeply. Why does scientists care? Right. Well, we think that, you know, human language didn't just appear out of nowhere. We gained this ability. We probably developed it over time. And so by looking at animals like these Marmosets or other species that seem to use name calls. So we've also seen this behavior in parents, in Egyptian fruit bats,
in elephants. So by looking at the way that this name use works in animals that don't use what we would think of as human language, we can learn more about how we develop the ability to speak. And finally, another kind of communication music. And how human brains react to it. Tell me more about this. That's right. So one of the things that makes it really fun to listen to a song is that it has distinct segments. And there's something between the segment called a musical boundary.
It's sort of like when you know the beats about to drop in a song, right? You're approaching the best. So fun. So researchers were like, well, what's going on in the brain when this musical boundary is coming up? And to find out, they took brain scans of these subjects while they were listening to three different, very different songs. So one of them was in the genre of Nuevo Tango from Argentina. One of them was progressive metal from the US. And then one of them was Stravinsky.
So Russian ballet. Waiting for the beat to drop in Stravinsky is underrated. And I'm not being sarcastic. That was one of the original beat drops. It's a classic. And what they found was that when they were approaching that point, when they were approaching that musical boundary, people's a network in the subject's brains lit up. And then after they passed the boundary, a different network was lighting up. So it's sort of like your attention is shifting between these two areas.
And they actually compared it to the way that our brains change attention to understand the differences between sentences in language. Very cool. That's all the time we have for now. Sophie Bushwick is senior news editor at New Scientist. Sophie, thanks so much for being with me today. Thank you. Support for Science Friday comes from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, working to enhance public understanding of science, technology, and economics in the modern world.
The movie slingshot, a sci-fi thriller about a years long mission to Saturn's Moon Titan is out in theaters today. Starting Lawrence Fishburn, it follows the crew members as they start to unravel, highlighting how long lonely missions can put astronauts well-being in peril. We have been in space for nearly two years. You have two more habitation cycles before the slingshot. Houston, we have a situation. The impact represents no real danger. What if the whole system is
compromised? We attempt the slingshot, we get blasted into deep space. While the movie is definitely a work of science fiction, it does remind us that a lot can go wrong in space, both physically and mentally. So as humans get closer to embarking on long missions to places like Mars and beyond, how are real space agencies thinking about keeping them happy and safe? Science Friday's digital producer of engagement, Emma Gomez sat down with the film's director, along with a space psychologist,
to answer those questions and more. Here's Emma. Joining me to talk about the science of astronaut psychology that slingshot puts on full display are Dr. Kelly Slack, an organizational psychologist who worked on space psychology for NASA and Mikael Hoefstrom, the film's director. And just to heads up to our audience, we'll discuss things that you might learn from the movie's trailer, but we won't spoil the film's many twists and turns. So welcome to both the View to Science Friday.
Thank you very much. Thank you. Glad to be here. So Mikael, what did you learn about this like long-term space travel concept while making the movie? Are you like a big sci-fi fan? Well, yes, I like sci-fi, but I'm also interesting in the human psyche. I think space and spaceship is a great barren of stories about, you know, about loneliness and solitude and longing and self-reflection in space. That's pushed to its limit. A few years ago, I made a film called
Forten Ray. It's a Stephen King adaptation with one character in a hotel room, the most part of the film. There are relatives that film, Forten Ray and the slingshot in the sounds. We don't need to know exactly what's going to happen with a human being so far away in space. So we have to guess and we have to talk to experts and it's a work of fiction and it's our tape, but our
characters go through during this special mission. And I hope the audience can feel with John the main character in this film and his struggles as human struggles, not only an astronaut's struggles. Yeah, that's what interested me about it too. And I mean, Dr. Slack as an expert in space psychology, what did you think of it before we get into the netagrity of everything?
I thought the film was very interesting. I enjoyed watching it and of course, having the space background, having worked at NASA for a while, I came at it from a different perspective than I think the average audience member would. Right. I mean, in the real world, how do space psychologists help keep astronauts mentally healthy in space on a long-term mission where you can't be in real-time communication with astronauts? Space is an isolated confined extreme environment. It's not supposed
to have humans in it. And humans are very social. And when you put that combination together, you get constrained humans who are in a limited social situation and that creates a lot of stressors on them. So they are doing a lot of research on what kind of prevention should we have? What kind of countermeasures can we put in place? Meaning what can we do to help them have the coping mechanisms and all the strategies that they need in order to have a successful mission? And then there's the
third thing of if something does occur, then what treatment options do we have? And another thing I want to touch on was the group dynamic. How big a role would you say teamwork and that dynamic between the crew plays into astronaut well-being? Extremely large. You have to have a team and you have to have a team that works well together and then you need a strong commander who will ensure that the team is staying as healthy as possible. There are a lot of different ways that NASA does
this and other space agencies do this. One thing that's common for commanders is to have the entire crew spend at least one meal together a day so that they get that face-to-face time on the space station. It's so large that you can go an entire day without running to other members of the crew. On a long duration exploration mission like is depicted in slingshot, there would not be the luxury at that amount of space or capacity. The vehicle would not be that large so you would be in close
approximately. So the work we're doing shifts more towards what degree of privacy to the different people need versus how much togetherness do we have? I mean and you mentioned a strong commander. I feel like in this movie there definitely is one but it still contributes to the conflict. Without spoiling much I would say that's true. So Mikael, like a NASA psychologist, I'm sure you thought
a lot about group dynamics too and how that would impact the film. How did you think about the dynamics between the actors and how that would translate to the astronaut team in the movie? I mean it's interesting because it's a small environment and the group dynamics is obviously key to make it work in such a special situation like being so far out of space. So we built this
spaceship on a sound stage and we didn't take out walls to shoot. We tried to keep it very sort of closed in but that created a sense of claustrophobia I think that was really good for all of us that worked in the film and we went down in the morning and we tried to avoid going out from filming a shooting in May. Just to help ourselves remind us where we were supposed to be on the ship. So you know the more we could push the that sense of loneliness the better for the actors
to feel right in the situation. So back to the kind of the space psychology of it all. In the movie the ship gets damaged and the crew just disagrees about what to do next and it kind of reminded me of how the Boeing Starliner crew is sort of stuck on the space station right now. I mean luckily they have guidance from Earth to decide their next move but Dr. Slack how are astronauts trained to manage disagreements about safety on a mission where real-time communication isn't possible or even when
communication might be lost. We have done a lot of prep work then if we don't have a real-time communication. We put countermeasures on board to increase the likelihood that we can help them even though it's not real-time. There would be kind of a doc in the box kind of thing or AI generated remote psychological help available for them. There was always a medical officer on board whether they're a medical doctor or not and they've been trained extensively in coping mechanisms
and how to deal with stressors and how to be aware of that both themselves and in others. We also would probably put something called proximity badges on them. The proximity badge is a way of us tracking to see if the patterns of interaction have changed over time and if they do then that gives us heads up that there might be an issue later and so then we can even with a communication
delay start addressing the potential issue that might occur in the future. One other thing is putting control in the hands of the crew actually is pretty effective as far as giving them a dashboard where they can check their own vitals signs. They can watch their own health status and that puts a lot of control in their hands and gives them a lot of strength as well. I wish that they had a space psychologist like you on the team at Slingshot. What's one of the most surprising things you've
learned through your work as a space psychologist working with NASA? I think for me is when we're looking at the space station as an analog to a long duration exploration mission. One of the things I wanted to do and I kind of flew this idea past a few people but it never got more than one degree away from me. I wanted to cover all the windows on the station to see how the astronauts could cope
without seeing Earth. One of the favorite things actually the number one activity that astronauts enjoyed doing when they're in space is taking photographs of the Earth or just sitting in the Coupola that mini windowed kind of bay window type thing that sticks out the side and looking at the Earth. And when they go somewhere like Titan or Mars they're not going to be able to see Earth and you just really have to wonder what happens when we as humans who are so tied to our Earth.
What happens when we are out there untethered and able to see that which grounds us? Right, I love that word untethered. Okay well thank you both for taking the time to talk about this. Thank you so much. It's been very interesting. Thank you so much. Dr. Kelly Slack, organizational psychologist and Mikhail Hovstrom, director of the new movie
Slingshot. It's out now. Thanks for that Emma. For more stories about science on the big screen subscribe to Emma's newsletter science goes to the movies at science friday.com slash movies. That's all the time we have for today lots of people help make the show happen including Sandy Roberts, Robin Kasmur, Jordan Smudjik, Charles Bergquest, George Harper. On Monday we'll explore how the shifting timing of the seasons could impact human psychology.
I'm Cyfryer, producer, D.P.D. Schmidt. See you then. See for yourself visit newscientist.com forward slash science friday today and sign up for just $1 a week for 10 weeks. Shop your coffee if you will needs at Walmart.