Five minutes past the hour. Good morning, Welcome the Morning Show with Thresten Scott Quick shout out. If you are listening to me, whether on radio or iHeart via Panama City stream at WFLA, Panama City, send me an email, let me know, or give Jose a call eight five zero two zero five WFLA. I don't know if we're back in Panama City or not. I didn't. I didn't get an update, and so I'm not sure. Hell Lou, yeah, let me know if we're back on in Panama City,
that would be that would be lovely. Welcome friends to the Wednesday edition of The Morning Show Show fifty two ten and August seventh, more on that date in mere moments. Our scripture today comes from Hebrews ten, and we're going to build on this the rest of the week. Verse nineteen says they'refore brothers sisters, since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that He opened for us through the curtain that is through his flesh. Well that
nineteen and twenty, that's where we're going today. Since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain. Let's pause there. The way that the temple was set up, there was a holy place and then the Holy of Holies. The Holy of Holies is where the ark of the Covenant would
have resided, where God's presence was. And there was a massive veil that separated the most holy place from the Holy of Holies, and only the high priest was allowed to go there, and only once a year, when Jesus died on the cross. The Bible tells us that that that curtain was torn. It was a one pieces massive curtain. It was torn significantly from top to bottom, so as to make a point of saying, man didn't do this
because you can't get up that high. This curtain was torn by the by the Holy Spirit, by the power of God. And there is therefore no separation now between God's people and God. Instead of a blood sacrifice, the sacrifice of Jesus now stands in its place, and the and the veil of separation is no more. And so this verse is reminding us we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, his sacrifice, by the new and living way that He opened for
us through the curtain. It's an amazing reminder that our righteousness is as filthy rags. Our righteousness to approach God comes through Christ. And by simply accepting that He did that for you and me, we are therefore cleansed. Our sins are forgiven. We are made righteous by the sacrifice of Christ. We are made whole by the work He did on the cross and our ability to get before God. It's now available to anybody who accepts that sacrifice because
Christ becomes your mediator. You don't need a priest or a pastor. You don't need someone else to say you're forgiven. It's okay for someone to say, hey, look, I know how God's word is, but that person isn't the one forgiving you. God forgives you because of the sacrifice of his son. It is that simple. Ten minutes past the hour, who get me fired up?
There?
We've got a show for you today, friends, Stick around. It is Wednesday on The Morning Show with Preston Scott. The Morning Show with Preston Scott's Loving passed the hour. I forgot to ask you when Jose over there in studio one day, when you said that you you will find old, broken guitars and try to fix them. Do you play guitar? Yes, cir not good.
I can fix them and refurbish them way better than I could play.
But so if you fix and refurbish and then to sell them to other people to give them away, what do you do with them?
I give them away or keep them, depending on on on you know, what it is or how much sentimental.
So even the curve part of the thing, you can fix that stuff, or there's just certain things you can do.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, there's there's you know, pretty much a bunch of things. I'll fix broken necks and headstocks.
And he's not talking about you know, personal chiropractical or surgical work friends. He's talking strictly guitars. I'll break the nicky more in that case. Okay, Yeah, I'm just curious about that, all right. August seventh, And what brought that up?
As we were talking about dumpster diving the other day, and you know, things he collects, and he was talking about guitars, and I when I hear the intro and music to this segment, I hear the guitar there, and it just made me think of our conversation yesterday or the day before, all right, August seventh, what we got here? Seventeen eighty two, George Washington creates the Purple Heart. Is
it really good? There's a great story on that. It's worth doing a deep dive sometime on the creation of the Purple Heart, which went away and then came back as an award to those who serve in the military and are wounded in battle. Seventeen eighty nine, Congress establishes the War Department, now the Department of Defense. Nineteen forty two. Nineteen forty two, the US troops land of Guadalcanal, marking a shift by Allied forces from defensive operations to an
offensive campaign. We're going to be offensive. Yeah, yeah, you hear me. Hear me, Adolph, We're gonna be offensive. Your mustache sucks? Yeah? Want more? There's more where that came from. About you got bad hair? How about how about a little shampoo? Pal looks a little greasy. You know what I'm saying. Uh, let's see here. Nineteen fifty nine, United States launches Explore six, the first satellite to photograph the Earth from orbit. Yeah, that was a bummer for the
flat earthers when we started getting photographs. But there are still flat earthers out there. There are people that believe the earth is flat.
O mg.
And Uh. Nineteen ninety eight, O Kaida explodes bombs at US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Tanzania, killing two one hundred and twenty four people, including twelve Americans. Al Kada enemies of all things decent. You know, it's interesting because there are a lot of and I would go so far as to say the majority of Muslims are peace
loving Muslims. The problem for them is that the Islamist extremists, they're the pure ones in terms of they follow the writings of Muhammad to the core, and they would consider the peace loving Islamis to be in an apostate condition, backslidden, and so right after they would target infidels such as you and me, They would target them because they consider them to have fallen away from the pure faith. And and so that's why you can't. You can't reason with that,
you know, you just you just can't. All right, when we come back the Olympics, crazy stuff happened yesterday, and I just I've got it. I've got another wonder I don't know about you, but I've observed so many people athletes male and female, representing so many countries, that go to college in America and train in America. And I'm thinking to myself, huh, we're training the world's athletes to compete against us, are we? And so I started doing
a little digging. And I haven't come to anything firm yet because the games are ongoing, but I'll share the results of what I've learned, and sixteen minutes past the hour, we'll talk a little bit about the games of the Summer Olympia of Paris. Next my heart's radio station. The Olympics. Some of you don't care because of the opening ceremonies. They get it. It's like yeah to that, but yeah, I want Americans to do well, and they are. They're
Americans are winning a ton of medals. wellIt's creegy in the world. But here's what interested me. Well, let me back up for a second. In the fifteen hundred meter, which is replaced the mile. The mile used to be a thing, and breaking the four minute mile was a thing. He might remember, Roger Banister, And you know, I'll and then we've just kind of lost that and it's become the fifteen hundred meter. And that's fine, you know, everything standardized,
running against the world and so forth. That's fine. As long as golf re mains yards not meters, I'm good. But in the fifteen hundred meter there's this bitter rivalry between Norway's Jacob Ingrits and Great Britain's Josh Kerr. And so they're running the final for the gold medal, and everyone's talking about those two, and early on in the race, the young lady that was commentating for NBC said, this
young guy named Cole Hawker University of Oregon. If he can somehow stay near these guys, he has the best finish of anybody, even though the other two were the absolute prohibitive favorites. And so in a race that everyone's attention was on them, Hawker runs them both down at the end and wins gold, and another American, Yared Nogose,
wins bronze. And the most arrogant of all the runners, the defending you know, I don't know if he was the defending gold medalist, but the defending world champion maybe Jacob Bigofertson. He didn't finish with a medal. Current ended up with silver, but he got run down by our boy. And so for the first time in one hundred and twelve years, the US had two medalists in the fifteen hundred first time in one hundred and twelve years, that's
the nineteen twelve Games. That's crazy. So congratulations there. But I got to thinking as i'm as I'm seeing athlete after athlete. I remember watching the swimming and Leon Leon Leon marshand was a thing. He's a he's a fantastic swimmer representing France, and so the home nation, the socialist president going nuts cheering this guy on, and he delivered four for four, four gold medals. He goes to Arizona
State University. He's trained by our trainers. One of our trainers in fact, ended up taking the head coaching job at the University of Texas. He's working for France. Bob Bowman, I think it was his name. He's a brilliant trainer, a swim coach. He coached I think Katie Ledecki and Michael Phelps, So I mean he's he's he's kind of the bomb when it comes to coaching. And here's this kid, now four gold medals. So this guy Is. He's he's
like the sense of swim, right. But I got I got thinking because I kept hearing over and over and over this university, that University Stanford's got a bunch of athletes representing the world. The University of Florida has a bunch of athletes representing the world. And in fact, I looked it up here we've got NCAA athletes representing more
than one hundred countries. They go to school here. The world record holder in the pole vault, who has the highest ten vaults in history, who broke his own world record, Armando Duplantis, goes by Mondo. He's he's spectacular. I mean, all the other pole vaulters watch and cheer for him. He's that good. I think he goes Tellsu but he's representing Sweden because his mom's originally from Sweden, though they live in the States. Now, I will admit there's a
part of me that's a little annoyed by this. You live in this country and you're representing another. That annoys me a little bit, but it's fascinating to me. So I dug up a little bit. This year twelve hundred and thirty five, incoming current or past NCAA athletes representing two hundred and fifty three different schools and one hundred and twenty five countries are competing this summer. So NCAA USA trained athletes are representing the United States and one
hundred and twenty four other nations. I don't know that I'm making a point other than imagine if those medals were added to our total. Imagine if the athletes that are trained in America, in United States colleges and universities here in this country, if those medal totals were added to ours, what that looks like. I'm going to see if I can make that happen. At the end of this find out just how many medals United States trained
athletes earned, not just Team USA but the rest. I think that's fascinating, of course, I think never mind twenty eight minutes Tames the Hour. Big Stories in the press Box are next, and they're large.
The Morning Show with Preston Scott on News Radio one hundred point seven doubled UFLA HI.
Big Stories in the press Box this morning. Ose can you see over there? We are glad to be back in Panama City. Thanks to all of you for reaching out. Some emails, making phone calls. You're back. Yes, our crew is awesome. Our chief engineer, Charlie Wooten, he's on it. Stuff happens right, storms come, things happen, stump breaks. But our guys, our peeps, are on top of it. So if there's ever an issue, it won't linger. Just be patient with us. We get to the big stories in
the press box. So a Pakistani man gets busted leaving the country because he was trying to hire a hitman to kill Trump and other US officials. Guys got ties to Iran and they nabbed him at the airport leaving the country on July twelfth. July twelfth, Now they say there's no connection to the Trump assassination attempt on the thirteenth. Apparently he did his own version of like calling hitman r us and that's like almost a guarantee that you're going to get an FBI agent or something like that.
And so he he was tipped the FBI was tipped off rather, and so the hit man was an FBI agent, and so they have video of him trying to arrange a hit on Trump and others using coded language and all that. So, yeah, forty six year old asif Merchant traveling to New York working with the hitman to carry out a planned assassination of government officials, including the former president?
Is anyone surprised? Iron is likely behind that. No, No, still don't have answers to a lot of questions as it relates to July thirteenth, though, Jamie Raskin, Democrat representative from Maryland, a little panel discussion on a that was recorded, It's Politics and Pros bookstore in Washington, DC. It was
a video that was recorded. It happened in February of this year, and on that video he speculated that because of the Supreme Court's likely rulings on Trump remaining on ballots, that it would be up to Congress to invalidate any election victory by Trump on the grounds that it would
risk civil war. My purpose in mentioning this is that number one, the videos resurfaced, people are paying attention to these things, and because it speaks to the lengths that they will go at least discussing ways to keep Trump from taking office. I just wanted to point that out. And then Kamala chooses Chim Walls, the governor of Minnesota. Next hour, I will go through how absurd, unhinged, off the hook and ridiculous this guy is. But for now, suffice to say he is bat crap crazy. He's nuts. No,
I mean, Kamala is just obscenely unintelligent. This guy is nuts and I can demonstrate it with policy. What he's done in Minnesota, what he has stated. His beliefs are publicly, openly, without any hesitation. He has left no doubt as to who he is. Kamalin believes that there are enough extremists to get her through to the finish line by choosing this guy. There's another calculation that she went with this guy because there are some that believe they must feel
like they have Pennsylvania locked up. They didn't choose Josh. I think it's Josh Shapiro. Of course, the other way of looking at that is that she inadvertently thought she was interviewing Josh Shapiro and she was interviewing Ben Shapiro. But that's another story altogether. Forty one minutes after the hour, more on Tim Waltz. Next hour, It's the Morning Show with Preston Scott. This is the Morning Show with press
In Scott. What a two minutes? What did two minutes past the hour Wednesday on the program Jade Johnson third hour. Lots to talk about with JD. Get his thoughts about. Okay, not just what went wrong in Pennsylvania, because I'm sure he'll have some thoughts on that, but how do you lay out a security plan. You may not be dealing with protecting the former president or president or vice president. You might not be dealing with dignitaries like that, But
what about your business? Is there anything to learn from the failures of what happened there? Actually, I think there are. I think there are a lot of things to learn. We'll talk about some developments just before our visit with JD.
So we've learned more new things every day. There's more new things, more more new failures, and I'm just curious to see what because we've not talked about this, I intentionally avoid certain subjects with Charlie and JD when we chat casually because I want to save that content and I want to save the freshness of the exchange, if you will. So I've not talked to JD about the
events of July thirteenth, so we'll do that. We'll also talk about that ruling by the Minnesota Tim Walls, Governor of Minnesota, Minnesota State Supreme Court, saying, you have to you have to flee, you have to attend, you have to attempt to flee before defending yourself with a weapon. Anyway, this story comes from real clear politics. Here's the headline, former Secret Service chief wanted to destroy cocaine evidence. What do you remember the story the bag of coke founded
the White House? And that you remember how that story fell off the map. Three separate sources inside the Secret Service state that Kim Cheatle and others in the agency wanted to destroy the cocaine discovered. They wanted it destroyed, but the Secret Service Forensics Services Division and the Uniform Division stood firm and rejected the push and would not let it happen. Chetah was not the director at the time. Cheetle got the job because she was on the detail
guarding Biden when he was vice president. Need I point out the number of things that happened, well, Joe Biden was vice president. I'm just saying, I'm not saying, I'm just saying. What's interesting is that the spokesman for the Secret Service said that there was no DNA or anything. See Hunter had been staying there in the days prior to the bag being found. They were not in the White House when the bag was found. It was likely left behind my hunter.
Likely.
But what's interesting to me is spokesman for the Secret Service, the FBI laboratory did not develop any latent fingerprints, insufficient DNA was president for investigative comparisons. And I find that laughable because more than likely that bag of cocaine had fingerprints and DNA all over it. And I say that because there was DNA found on the button on a
knife sheath in Idaho. That's likely going to play a role in the conviction of Brian Coberger in the murder of those Idaho students University of I think it's University of Idaho, four kids that were stabbed to death. They got this DNA off of DNA off of a latent touch, just a little touch of the button. And you're telling me that plastic bag that was absolutely grabbed and handled didn't have DNA on it. I'm not buying it, not
buying it one bit. But that the former director of the CIA wanted it covered up and destroyed tells you all you need to know, because she had done vice presidential details. She knew who it was, she knew, she knew. Forty seven minutes after the hour, got some health news next on The Morning Show with Preston Scott. WFLA lead research assistant of the Morning Show with Preston Scott sent me this and it was just interesting. You know, this is just one of those stories that floats across the
desk lance in public health. And even though there are things that we recognized that were being published during COVID that were just patently wrong, and they were and we've watched the many claims of COVID science walked back as predicted because the claims made by many and sadly a lot of those claims were bullied onto doctors. But doctors should have stood in opposition to what was being said
and foisted upon us, because that's what costs lives. What cost lives during COVID was misinformation and disinformation and quite frankly, a rush to get a vaccine to the market. It was brutal and it cost people lives. You may remember there was a time period when if you were a hook hooked up to a ventilator, say goodbye, get your will in order. We've watched how people that were multi vaccinated they're still getting the VAT, they're still getting shots,
and and they're still getting COVID. And those of us that have not gotten the vaccine, we've developed the natural antibodies because that's how our immune system was designed to work by God. But anyway, in this study published found that Gen X and millennials are more likely to be diagnosed with seventeen different types of cancer, including nine that had been declining in older adults. So why is it that these forms of cancer are growing and they're seventeen
different at once in younger generations? Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent. It has been rising among younger people, and that led to an investigation of other types of cancer. And yeah, and so what the science is leaning into is obesity. That it is one of the single biggest indicators of a kind of a breeding ground for potential problems.
So take that for whatever it's worth. Next hour, got a lot of email from many of you yesterday, and I'm calling it a very large elephant in the room. But I have some good news to alleviate and to address the elephant. We'll talk about all of that next as we begin second hour of the Morning Show with Preston Scott. All Right, we're gonna take a little time and address something that was brought to my email box
and bunches yesterday. And yesterday was spent yours truly doing two things, working in my yard and engaging in a very extensive back and forth with my friends at James Madison Institute. Now, as you know, the president, doctor Bob McClure, we've had a long standing relationship. Bob is a regular guest on the show. And you know, formerly salnwso worked with the James Madison and helped us with legislative stuff. Sal still does that, but in a different capacity with
a different organization where he's executive director now. But JMI puts out a quick guide to constitutional amendments and it offers a pro and con just kind of a very centrist view of here's what you're getting. Amendment one establishing school board elections as partisan, Amendment two establishing a state constitutional right to hunt and fish. Amendment three recreational marijuana, and Amendment four the right to abortion, Amendment five's homestead exemption,
and number six is repeal a public campaign financing. It was number four. That really lit a fire under a lot of people. And in their guide they write and they state they show the ballot language. The ballot language I have maintained and do maintain, is ambiguous at best, deceptive intentionally at worst, or intentionally deceptive at worst, but under any circumstances, has no right being on our ballot. It violates all of the guidelines that is required for
something to appear on the ballot. It is not single subject to me. But more importantly, all of the justices agreed that the language was ambiguous and problematic. It's just that four justices, four male justices, ironically chose to put it on there. The three female justices said no, it shouldn't be on the ballot. But it's on the ballot.
And one of the reasons why it's pulling just above the passage number is because the mainstream media polling entities are not representing the ballot properly and unfortunately, in the early draft and what was originally released by the James Madison Institute, in my opinion, in the opinion of certainly a ton of you, they fell into the trap of
the misrepresentation. Now they did it with the best of intentions, and I have been told after a lot of dialogue yesterday that it is being retooled, that they're going to adjust the language of their summary. The part that got them in trouble with a lot of you was this what your vote means? Yes, a vote on this amendment.
A yes would legalize abortion in the state of Florida before the period fetal viability, estimated to be around twenty four weeks, or when a healthcare provider deems it necessary for the safety of a mother. What I took issue with and argued vehemently, is that by putting a number in their summary, in their guideline to what a yes vote means, they fell into the trap of what the mainstream media was doing. It doesn't matter what doctors say is a consensus, it doesn't matter anything. There is no
number in the ballot language. There is no definition of time frame of viability none. By putting a number on it, it misleads people into thinking that this would only allow abortions prior to twenty four weeks or twenty four weeks or sooner. And that's just not true. It just isn't. Now, as I understand it, they're going to modify this language to state doctors place viability or words to this effect at twenty four weeks, but the ballot language does not specify that would be I guess.
More.
It certainly is far better. I maintain that. And I'll be candid with you. And I said this to my friends at JMI, and I will say this to and I said this to those that emailed me, and I'm saying this to you. Now. I am correct in my analysis of this. I say that with great confidence because I read the comments of all of the justices, those that passed it and those that said no. They all agreed this is going to be litigated like crazy, which is as huge red flag. I've got more on this,
more to come. Eleven past the hour. It's the Morning Show with Preston Scott. This is the Morning Show with Preston Scott. Now you'll notice I'm not even addressing issues of God and faith at this point. I'm pointing out the legal issues that are contained in this ballad amendment as it's written. There are three areas that I will call areas of ambiguity because they are not defined. And the fact that they are not defined means that there is no definition through which you can determine a limit.
I have pointed out to you that sadly, the pro life movement has not properly argued the issue of viability for decades, because the issue of viability is it's quite actually moot. Children are not viable apart from the intervention of a guardian, a parent, medical professionals, until they're able to walk and communicate on their own. I pointed to the story of an eighteen month old baby that was left in her crib while her mother went on a vacation for a week and the baby died. That child
at eighteen months was not viable. Say, well, you're taking that to extreme. When you don't define viability with a specific point, it means anything. It's like my friend John Stenberger said about marriage. If marriage can mean anything, marriage means nothing. If viability can mean anything, viability means nothing. The secondarrea inside the language of the ballot patience health defined as emotional health, mental health, financial health. What kind
of health are we talking about? Secondary of ambiguity. Third area of ambiguity healthcare provider. Who's that is planned parenthood? A healthcare provider. I would argue absolutely positively not this and let me get to the final point I want to make here. First, my thanks to James Madison Institute because they engaged in the conversation with me, and credit to them for doing so. And I believe they're making
adjustments to this. But and I'll have more to say on this as it relates to people voting for this that claim to be Christians, because I had a very, very very pointed part of a conversation with someone who is running for office. I will not say whether they're an incumbent or a candidate, whether it's a state office, a local office, I won't say. But I had a very pointed discussion with somebody on Christians and issues like this, and issues like being a member of the organization called
the Democrat Party. I'll get to that and reiterate that point some other time, but for now, since we're not voting yet on this. That'll happen in November. I just want you to understand if you vote for Amendment four for passage, you are voting for putting in the Constitution an unfettered unlimit a limitless access to abortion at any time at any time. Because viability is not defined, it doesn't say twenty four the polling is saying that it's
not in the language. It doesn't exist. I can't stress this enough. Don't believe me. Look it up, don't be lazy, don't be sorry, don't say oh, he's just exaggerating. Look it up for your self. There is no time limit in the amendment. It says, in fact, no law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, restrict abortion before viability. But they don't define viability. So any number in any poll, any number in any breakdown of this is misleading by its existence. I can't say
this strongly enough. All Right, we're gonna move on to a fascinating pole not poll, a fascinating table some a fascinating email that I got that shares some things, and the question is did you fall for any of it? If so, which one? I'll break it down next here on the Morning Show with Preston Scott. I'm late, sorry, yeah, never mind. Ihearts Radio season twenty three past. The are perhaps my longest serving research assistant besides the lead research
assistant of the program. Lou sent this to me. I don't know where the list came from. I just know the list is really good. The headline is a question which of these psyops did you fall for? Here's what stands out to me, the massive numerical number of efforts to take down Trump. I don't think you will find in the history of American politics anything close. Did you fall for any of these? Were you believing in any of these storylines? Russian collusion twenty twenty election most secure
in history? Trump called neo Nazis. Fine, people, if you get vaccinated, you won't catch COVID, Yussi Smolette. Now, not all these are directly related to Trump, but they're directly related to efforts on the left to shape narratives related to Trump. Bubba Wallace garage, poll hunter, Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, Covington kids, Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot, Chinese weather balloon, Kavanaugh rape. Trump said drinking Bleach would fight COVID. Russia
bombed their own pipeline, Trump pe tape. Remember that the whole Urinasian prostitute thing COVID lab leak was a conspiracy theory. Border agents whipped migrants, Trump saved nuclear secrets at mar A Lago, the Steele dossier, Russian bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan, Muslim travel ban. Andrew Cuomo showed the best COVID leadership the Ghost of Kiev. Trump built cages for migrant kids. Al Baghdati was an austere religious scholar. Trump
overfed koy fish in Japan. Trump tax cuts benefited only the rich. Cloth masks prevent COVID and SUV killed parade marchers. Trump used teargas to clear a crowd for a Bible photo. Don't say gay was in a bill, putin price hike. Ivermectin is a horse de warmer, not for humans. Mostly peaceful protests. Trump overpowered secret service for Wheel of the Beast. Officer Sick Nick was murdered by protesters. July sixth was
an insurrection. Trump mocked a reporter's disability. That's an impressive list of stories that were just manipulated, created completely and totally false, were specifically designed to target Trump, or to target narratives or to boost narratives that were created. And it's a lesson and maybe better than the word lesson and illus of why shows like mine across the country exist. I'm just one guy. I'm grateful we've got listeners in a bunch of states. Forty plus forty five plus states.
I am thrilled, and as I say, because we certainly talk about things in Florida's capital city, because I think that those things serve as lessons to other communities. We are a local talk show with a very broad national view, a macro view. All politics are local and as a result of how we do what we do on our show, I think we do a morning drive radio program very differently than most, which is why we tend to stick with people that are just thumbing around and they stumble
upon us on iHeart share what we do. Share this show with your friends, share it with your colleagues, Share it with people that may not be aware based on what they consume in the mainstream media, that they're being duped. I won't say we're a red pill. I will say we are. We are an open door to pursuit of truth and we can help people find their way. Twenty eight minutes after the hour, seven things you ought to Know about the new Vice president nominee for Kamala Harris.
It's the morning show when Preston Scott.
Run and wait because I'm passionate about the issue of Amendment four. Sorry not sorry, sound like a Reese's commercial. Don't I peanut butter cups? Sorry not sorry anyway. Big stories in the press box this morning on the Morning Show with Presidon Scott. Whose ken you see over there in Studio one? A? I am here in Studio one B. By the way, little sidebar story here. Corey Bush, another member of the squad. That's two down. Two of them
have lost reelections. She got knocked out of a Democrat primary, a pro Israel Democrat beater. She's livid, she is angry. G HGWS. It came back to bid her anyway. Here are this Here are seven things town Hall's Mia Cathell listed as noteworthy on Tim Walls. The new vice presidential pick for Kamala He. He believes in pediatric medical mutilation.
Minnesota is a sanctuary state. He signed a bill. In fact, it gave state courts the power to take kids away from parents if they don't sign off on the gender reassignment of their children. He also gave the state temporary jurisdiction. If a child runs away from another state and seeks services, Minnesota will not return the child. That's how extremist he is. Needless to say, the LGBTQ crowd is ecstatic with this choice. He believes socialism is akin to neighborliness, quoting don't ever
shy away from our progressive values. One person's socialism is another person's neighborliness. He even his own actions or inactions during the BLM riots in the wake of George Floyd and abject failure, but his running mate kamalap Remember was promoting bail programs for bom rioters that were arrested, so he failed there and at least has admitted that COVID nineteen fanaticism. Issued a memorandum he was a COVID nineteen militant. He set up a hotline for residents to report anyone
violating mask mandates and other mandates. He got angry when people were walking around outside around the lakes, quote, we're seeing crowds that are a little too big, especially around the lakes. He was a COVID Nazi. Illegal Immigration twenty twenty three signed the North Star Promise, allowed illegals to enroll in Minnesota Care. Healthcare provided scholarships to illegal aliens, raised taxes even though they had a seventeen and a half billion dollars surplus because they tax the crap out
of citizens in Minnesota. I know, I know about Minnesota. I still have family there. Abortion. He enshrining to write to abortion without limits the Protect Reproductive Options Act in twenty twenty three. So he believes in unrestricted abortion and pledged that his state would be in a six sixty nine page plan that his state would transition to one hundred percent carbon free electricity by twenty twenty. He's nuts, certifiably nuts, just letting you in one of the big
stories in the press box this morning. Here on The Morning Show with Preston Scott. Forty one minutes past the hour, jad Johnson joins us in personal defense. Next hour, first responders, thank you, It's the Morning Show with President Scott. One two three more. Got an update on July thirteenth. In just a few minutes, I'm already getting material from the research team for tomorrow's show. It never stops. Never. It's why I have to check my email even when I'm
on vacation. Can you imagine if I went a week without checking my email, No way, I couldn't function. I would just do a mass deletion and then I would lose all kinds of things. Can't do that. This would be really those of you in Panama City. This is like, this is a no brainer if you're into the military. And I don't know the process for getting on the grounds for this, I don't know. I could probably, you know, go through someone in Congress, Senator Rick Scott, Senator Marco Rubio, somebody.
But the Naval Air Station in Pensacola is going to host the commissioning of a new advanced amphibious warship September seventh. I think they ought to do it on the eleventh, but that's just me. You're gonna do it on the seventh. I had never heard of Captain Richard McCool junior. May I just for a moment, pause and say, what an awesome name. Who's that over there? That's uh, that's McCool. Just I just hear the I just I just I mean, And he lived up to the name. Doing a little
background here and I'll explain why. Captain Richard McCool was awarded the Medal of Honor for heroism during the Battle of Okinawa. He led the effort to evacuate survivors from a sinking destroyer, then fended off a Kamakazi attack on his own ship. Rallying the crew to fight raging fires despite his own serious injuries, and so we now have a ship named after him and the USS McCool. It is. It is an amphibious Assault vehicle Transport Troop Transport V
twenty two Osprey Transport. It is a state of the art bad machine. Saw some video of the inside of this bad boy. It can deploy marines into near shore waters and a bunch of them. It can carry assault amphibious vehicles, and then it's got room for even a bunch of ospreys. And they're going to commission this thing. If it's open to the public. Go, That's all I'll say to you. Go forty six minutes up to the hour. The Richard m McCool Junior, the USS McCool.
On September seventh, Morning, Joe at Preston Scott's.
Go Ahead makes Midday.
On News Radio one hundred point seven. Tell the USLA.
Fifty one past the hour Wednesday on the Morning Show. Just a quick little titbit here for tomorrow. Tomorrow Jason Snead, he executive director of Honest Elections Project, We're going to get a little bit of a an answer to a question how confident are we that the elections coming up in November will be fair? This is this is his whole world, paying attention to what's going on in the states.
I'm also going to ask him if my idea really is a violation of the Constitution, and that is to have federal standards for the federal portion of the elections. I am convinced that, for example, I believe that the way we do our elections here in Leon County is the right way to do them. A paper ballot, optical scanner, so that if there's ever a question, you have the
paper ballots, you just there they are. And I believe that the Constitution does give room for Congress to adopt a federalized manner of holding a federalized election, so the President, vice President, and members of Congress, House and Senate that and if states want to have two ballots, that's up to them. But for federal elections, I believe we have a right to have it be consistent, standardized, and we
know what's happening. That's just my opinion. This ridiculousness that we watch go on where we get our results in Florida by midnight, and there are other states that aren't going to give us results for days? No, no, no, no, no, no no. That's the equivalent of saying, uh, how many votes do we need to get our guy across the finish line? Okay, we'll find them. And that's how you get affidavits of guys delivering ballots across state lines. That's
how you get stuff like that. That's how you get wait a minute, we got to stop counting right now, how many do we need? That happened in multiple states, just saying all right. Update on July thirteenth, this from town Halls Matt Vespa to multiple Sorry. Multiple whistleblowers are alleging now within the Secret Service that the lead site agent was inexperienced and unqualified for the task, but has yet to be disciplined. Does anyone does anyone get surprised
by that news? No, no, there's no surprise there. The question becomes how is that allowed? Second, this is really interesting to me, and this is now coming through Josh Holly and members of Congress on the various subcommittees. Whistleblowers are telling Holly that the Secret Service did not check
IDs when issuing credentials for restricted areas. So I guess in theory as if Merchant, the guy they've arrested at an airport who undercover agents recorded and met with him trying to hire somebody to kill Trump, as well as others other government officials trying to arrange a hit. This is a Pakistani with ties to Iran. He's now under arrest,
so he could add one of his boys. He thankfully when he dialed up hitman for us, he got an FBI agent, and the FBI agent recorded their conversations, videotape their meetings, and oh, by the way, just as it's just an odd coincidence, they say there was no connection. It just is interesting to me. He was arrested on July twelfth, leaving the country. They say it has no connection to what happened on the thirteenth. Maybe not, but are you giving them that benefit of the doubt at
this point, I'm not. And of course there's the whole perimeter plan and the not having anybody on the roof and allowing Trump to get to the X at the platform that agents say that that's what they call it the X. All I know is the only person that's lost their job is the director. And that's not good enough for what happened. The failure's there, and I believe it's all on the advanced team primarily. But that's one of the things I want to talk with J. D.
Johnson about. He's a security expert. Get his thoughts, his reactions to what happened then, and then we're gonna talk about a couple of other stories, including that story in Minnesota where the Supreme Court in Minnesota has ruled you've got to retreat before you defend yourself. That's coming up next. Hour three awaits Wednesday here on the Morning Show with Preston Scott. These shows and they're just moving faster and faster.
I wish I kind of feel like I have to just kind of put my foot down to stop things from rotating so fast. I don't think it'll matter. But welcome to the third hour of The Morning Show with Preston Scott, and we are joined by It's the first Wednesday of the month, and that means it's time to have a conversation with our friend JD. Johnson, co founder the Talent Training Group, co host of Talent Outdoors. But topping all of that on our resume, Friend of the
Morning Show with Preston Scott, Hello, good sir. How are you.
I'm fantastic. How about yourself? I'm doing well good.
What was your reaction on July thirteenth when you heard someone took a shot at former President Trump?
My wife and I were eating dinner and got the phone call or text message from her dad that was watching it live.
And I wasn't.
I can't say I was shocked.
I think people the people that like him love him, and the people that hate him really hate him, and I wasn't.
I was not surprised.
Once you realize, okay, this has happened, where does your mind go?
Man? My first thing was, I hope he's I hope he lives through this. I hope he's not, you know, because I think it happened. We didn't see it, you know, if i'd have seen him jump up whatever. Right after it happened, I'm like, okay, I'm I was really concerned of what would happen in the aftermath, if they would have been successful. That's that's where my first thoughts went.
Once you realized a little bit more, you you saw some more information, because you know, you're you're law enforcement, You you do security training, you do all of these things. You've you've handled a rifle with a scope, and you've done swat stuff, right, I mean I.
Helped train the swat team. I was never on a swat team. I was on the dive team.
So okay, your dive team, but you helped train. Yeah, absolutely, and you realize, Okay, he turned his head. I mean that's just one of those providential moments that changes history.
Right.
Absolutely, We've we've seen that before at different times. My mind immediately went to, like you had mentioned, at the outset the people that hate him, that Joe Biden's performance in the debate was so bad that somebody in that chain, in that pool decided there was one thing left that
could be done. Here's my question to you, with all of your vast experience, knowing what we know now, which isn't a whole lot the ineptitude of the protection that day I want to get to, but is there anything that has caused you to think one way or the other that this is broader than just allowing or having this kid on a roof.
Well, I look at it like this. You only have there's only only two plausible explanations in my mind. Okay, you either have just the most unbelievably gross amount of negligence or incompetence that's at a level that we have a hard time wrapping our head around from an agency that's tasked with protecting our top people in our government,
the Secret Service. So you either have this this just unbelievably uh gross incompetence, or you have a few key people wanting it to happen or allowing it to happen. And I really personally don't believe in coincidences. Coincidences are very rare. When you have that many coincidences line up,
it's even more rare. So the logical, my logic, my logic for this is my opinion, but my logic for this is it's it's just really hard to wrap my head around that much incompetence all happening at the same time, at the same place, with the same with that.
With this outcome.
I just happen to be a day of this gross negligence and incompetence when this kid just happens to show up with a rifle and happens to be able to get inside of one hundred and fifty yards, which is a chip shot for anybody that's ever to pull the trigger.
On the rifle. You know, what are the odds that you have to look at? What are the odds?
I mean, you know, and I made this statement yesterday. It's the totality of the errors that leaves me to a place where I think there's only one conclusion. Whether it was overtly, covertly planned, or allowed, it's still the same thing. Yeah, it is an attempt on Trump's life that was in some sense orchestrated.
There you go, that's exactly That's exactly my feelings on it.
Because the likelihood of that many things lined, that many stars lining up all at the same time to allow it that happens just blows your mind.
Jad Johnson with us. We got a lot to talk about. Ten past the hour of the Morning Show with Preston Scott. Remember you can find out more at Talonrange dot com.
On news Radio one hundred point seven double USLA. And we're back Jad Johnson with us of the Talent Training Group.
We're talking about July thirteenth, and I want to get you know, Charlie and I talked about it because we visited shortly after the event. I wanted to get your your thoughts and insights on it.
You were just saying, now, of all the I think that theft that the left and the people in this country that have a problem with citizens being armed really want the AR fifteen out of the hands of the public.
But they hadn't been.
Jumping up and down and screaming and yelling about this AR fifteenth, this particular one.
Yep.
And of all the firearms that I would have chosen if had I been the bad guy, I'd be pretty that wouldn't be real high on my list. I mean, there's thank god that kid didn't have a thirty out six with a scope on it, a deer rifle. You know, we've been a different outcome.
Do you think you could make the argument that at least that one officer, whether it was a sheriff's deputy or a police officer from that community, just poking his head up on the roof, rushed the thing enough that might have caused the errant effort, possibly sure threw him off his schedule. We talk about that all the time, creating a situation where now the perpetrator is the reactor, not the planned operation underway.
Yeah, I mean absolutely that could have could have been part of the scenario that you know that had an effect on it.
I want to talk about not so much spiking the football and what they went what they did improperly, because I think that is well agreed to at this point, even by them. When you look at a secure security scenario, and let's just apply it to any business and they are trying to create the safest environment for their employees as and maybe customers clients as they can. What are the things that go into a site evaluation that you and Charlie and your team do well.
Line of sight to and from the building or the area that you're trying to protect, being able to see threats coming from a distance, you know, cutting off possible or not allowing possible areas of a blind spot basically or uncovered areas. Yeah, those are some of the big ones. And just you know, having a having a plan in place, and following that plan. I don't think they had much of that, uh even you.
Know, I said earlier in the show, I think that even in this scenario, as unique as it is, you're protecting a former president and a candidate in such a high profile environment, I think there are lessons to learn, and I think that the failures of even an agency like the Secret Service, offer us opportunities.
Yeah, and you know, if we if we go with the gross negligence or incompetence thing, if we go with that as our as our what happened kind of our premise, our premise. Yeah, that's a good word. Thank You's big word for me. Anyways, Sorry, I've only had one cup of coffee this morning. You know, if we go with that, then man, they just left out so many things that why didn't you have somebody on that roof. I mean it's it's one hundred and thirty yards one hundred and
fifty yards away. That's so simple, that's just simple things. If they'd had an officer standing up there.
See, and I think about, you know, just the person that listens to us, and you know, we get around because we talk about so many issues over the years, we kind of I'm wanting to kind of circle back to that beginning stages of evaluation of your business and protecting your business from bad people and the simple things, the simple things. I kind of want to go back to that. Here next it's sixteen past the hour.
J D.
Johnson with us. We're talking about July thirteenth, but we're now starting to transition into what, if anything, we can glean from what went wrong and how we can apply that to our circumstances and situations, whether it's a business or just yourself. Here in the Morning Show with Preston Scott twenty one Past the Hour, J D. Johnson with us of the Talent Training Group and co host of Talent Outdoors. You can listen to its Saturdays at ten Eastern.
When Charlie was talking about the events, he noticed the female Secret Service officer that was struggling a whole string or weapon and just talking about the the just the biological differences, the physiological differences in how women are made versus men and the problems that that can pose. And a lot has been made of the fact that they didn't keep Trump's head down, that that you know, Trump violated every rule, but so did they in their covering
of him. Though I applaud them, they did what they do. Do you think, DEEI played a role in this in any way, shape or form.
I have no idea.
I mean it, they're quite possible. I mean, you know you have uh could have very well had that And I don't know. I know that they showed some some indications of lack of lack of training, lack of stress and ocular training and and that's a stress and oculation training is time consuming and expensive.
Uh for law enforcement.
Explain explain what that is?
It forces on force scenario based training using semunitions or some other kind of FX marking cartridge where you actually have somebody playing the role of a bad guy that's shooting plastic bullets, uh, paint, you know, paint bullets at you, and you're shooting paint bullets back at them, and they hurt.
When it hits.
And there's there's a there's a there's a pain penalty if you if you mess up. And that's truly the only way to train for real life to where the stress of the stress of the moment doesn't affect you like we saw.
It affect them. You mentioned in the last segment businesses having a plan. Yeah, absolutely, and uh, you know, taking are there commonalities some sure? I mean you have to if you have a business or you have even in your home, you need to have a Okay, what if a bad guy kicks the door in what am I gonna do? Because if you don't, if you've never thought about that, I can tell you what you're gonna do. You're gonna do nothing. You're gonna freeze.
Crap your pants, You're gonna freeze, and you're gonna be there and you're gonna be at the mercy of of the bad guy. Right, you know, making your business or your home look like a hardened target, even if you know, no matter what with cameras and it's you know, make it a difficult, difficult place to uh for.
A bad guy to exist.
Do you We've talked about over the years that the gun free zones, the signs that that signal a gun free zone are disastrous. What about the inversion of that, Do you signal that you have a firearm if you're a business owner.
I don't think it hurts. I really don't. I mean, I don't know if there's been any studies done on that, because we know the inversion is true, that they that we out those targets right, they want a gun free zone and a place not likely for somebody to be armed or where they think it's right that somebody is not going to be armed. And luckily in Florida, when we see those signs, we can free state. Yeah, in
public areas, we can kind of ignore those signs. You know, you can't you can't carry your gun in the in the receiving facilities like the hospital. You can't carry it into certain federal buildings or state buildings and police departments and places like that. But the sign on the big sign on the door at the movie theater, uh, you pretty much ignore that. That's that has no no legal binding to keep you from entering. Now, if you're discovered to be armed while you're.
To leave, you go. You don't want to get you don't want to get into that contest.
Because at that point it becomes an issue where they can with the farm. That's correct.
So trespassing with a firearm at that point, if you're asked to leave and you don't, then you're trespassing with a firearm, which is a fellow in me and you go to jail. But yeah, I don't know, you know, we have guns in here, signs. I don't know if they prevent things or not. You know, if the we can say they prevent elephant attacks, because there's probably not been any elephant attacks. But you know what I'm saying, they're sure you we have no way of we have there's no studies done on that.
So we've got a minute left. What's the single most important thing for that plan for a business business owner to have when it comes to personal defense in their safety?
You know, know what's going on in your business, and that's done with cameras and door chimes and stuff like that. If you have a back door, you know, just something as simple as a beeper on the door that lets you know somebody open that door and whether or not that's ordinary. Having a having a plan for your employees, tell them what you expect to them in a situation like that.
Are you going to be compliant and try to whatever?
To a point?
You know which direction are we leaving the building? If something bad happened, sure, you know where are we going to go after we leave the building? So, and every building is different, every building, every facility is different, every one of them. You know, we go to churches and
stuff a lot, and every church campus is different. So we have to just basically give them ideas of where this is the weakest point I would I see here, This is where what I would do if I wanted to inflict the most casualties.
This is how I would stop that or prevent that, or try to mitigate that.
Back with more with J. D. Johnson. The Minnesota Supreme Court rules that a threatened person must retreat before brandishing a weapon. We'll talk about that and the stupidity of it next on the Morning Show with President Scott Preston Show with Morning Scott. What Back with jad Johnson of the Talent Training Group, our personal defense segment, and we pivot now just a little bit, leaving July thirteenth in the rearview mirror for now. I'm sure there'll be lots
to talk about in the months to come. I suspect we're not going to get a lot of information all at once. There'll be just little things here there that make it to the back pages of the online papers. But I was talking to you in the break about this Minnesota Supreme Court ruling and just the discussion of a person must retreat before brandishing a weapon now in Minnesota, and you were just pointing out the history of what happened here in Florida.
Yeah, you know, before the Castle doctrine was adopted his law here in Florida, there once upon a time there was a duty to retreat in your home if somebody broke into your house.
At night, you had to try to get out of the house and let them have it.
And that was what was that? Do you know where that all stemmed from? Was there a case that brought that up? That's just this was stupid. This was a long time ago.
The castle doctrine has been around a long time and I don't think I don't think the real system worked that way.
But that was the law. There was.
There was a duty to retreat once upon a time in Florida. Uh that got corrected by the by the castle doctrine and expanded even to it doesn't matter home or car or whatever, it's wherever you are in Florida. You there's no duty to retreat. Some people won't have that option, you know, to to run away. Not everybody has the ability to retreat at at a at a rapid enough pace, uh to for it to be effective.
You know, you get people that are infirmities and elderly and just situationally, you don't always have the ability to retreat easily. So thankfully the castle doctrine and expansion of the castle doctrine of the standard ground laws in Florida, that's that's not the law here. I don't understand this ruling up there. It doesn't reading the specifics of the case up there doesn't sound like a precedent setting. How they could construe that as a precedent setting case for
a landmark case. It didn't seem to be right, uh, but they turned it into one. You had a guy saying he's gonna cut it. You pull out a knife and I'm gonna I'm gonna slight your slash your throat or whatever. Another guy pulls out a bigger knife and that's not a knife.
This is yeah, that's uh but yeah, so and you're gonna charge the guy that bring the bigger knife to the knife fight. It makes no sense. I don't I don't get it.
And then you're gonna expand that to if they pull out a knife and you have a gun, you've got to try to get away, try to run from this person or get away from this person that's that's threatening you with a knife. Now, you know, I don't want to see us go back to uh, gun fights in the street, But that hasn't happened either.
We've had this, We've had the.
Even in open carry states, right. It just it's very rare for that to happen. I'm not saying it doesn't happen. It's very rare, and unfortunately, you do have some prosecutors that don't like the law, the standard ground, or the castle doctrine so much that they apply it improperly to people conducting criminal activity, and you know, the in the process of criminal activity and getting into gunfights and not charging the almost to prove a point, right, to prove
a point. We've seen that around the state where you've got two drug dealers that get in a fight and well, he was just standing his ground.
No, he wasn't.
He was a dope dealer and they had a shootout, and you need to put if they're both alive, and you put both of them in jail. But they don't want to argue that side of the case either.
So when we come back the issue of defending oneself and retreating all of that, are there ways that you can train yourself to be better prepared in a situation where you're in front of it. We'll talk about that next final segment here with J. D. Johnson of the
Talent Training Group. While on the topic of castle doctrine and defending oneself, we like to at least throw in something that people can go to the range and do some training and consider improving their skill set, because you know, we all see the people just standing in front of the paper targets and plunking, And if that's what you
want to do, that's awesome, great. But if you're serious about defending yourself, what are some drills, some things that you can do to improve your ability to be more likely successful in defending your life or the life of a loved one.
Well, with with live fire, it would be building in movement to your live fire exercise. So where you're shooting the target, start backing up, walking backwards carefully, you know, not running backwards and shooting over your shoulder right, but controlled move movement laterally, because not always is your best escape straight back straight away from your threat. Sometimes it can be a lateral movement left or right to where you.
Where you have some.
Sorry I had to give it. Our mind goes that's okay.
Uh, you know, lateral movement left or right. You may have available cover or an available scape escape route to the left of the right, So incorporate some movement into your your live fire drills if.
You're If you're doing that all right, always maintain uh eye contact, focus on where you're projecting your target to.
BEM, and never move any faster than you can safely control the firearm or hit your target. Okay, it's not about speed, it's about it's about some kind of kind of movement. The best way to train for any of this kind of stuff is scenario based training. And there's a couple of different ways to do scenario based training.
One of them's painful and expensive, which is with air softer paintballs out all in the ouch and all that stuff and having to wear protective gear and that gets that gets really time consuming and.
Painful, I know it.
And the other way would be the video based stuff. We've you know, we've got a we've got a system, a laser shots system at the range. That's it's a it's a giant screen that you're interacting with life size characters that are talking to you, looking at you, and when you we can kind of guide the scenario to where it different things happen. There's different different outcomes to the same scenario and you're engaging, you're engaging with a video screen.
Now that's not.
Not as effective as real life scenario based training, but it is effective. It does work, especially if you've got a bunch of friends around, because there's some there's some stress induced on performance. There's some some performance based stress. You don't want you buddies ribbing at you for, you know, ribbing you for for missing or messing up or what.
And in these kinds of programs, the the instructor is in the back of the room determining what the perpetrator may or may not do on that screen, right.
Not in the back of the room, standing right there next to you, So that added stress of having somebody looking over your shoulder.
But the perpetrator on the screen may put down their weapon, may not put down their weapon right correct.
The instructor can can basically if you give good verbal commands, draw your weapon out and speak authoritatively and give good verbal commands. We can surrender. Some of them have the ability to You can turn the lights off. The instructor can turn the lights off in the room so you're all of a sudden now you can't see.
As well.
We can pepper spray, taser, you know, hit them with something. Sure, there's different there's different outcomes that can be controlled by the by the instructor and it's imperative to have a good instructor when you're doing all this stuff.
Does it change if you're defending the life of somebody other than you, the considerations in how you you react to a situation as a threat.
There can be sure, you know, and not everybody wants to even put themselves in that in that position because there there's always uh you're always you're taking on liability onto yourself of possible civil, civil or criminal problems.
Down the road.
If you stand in the shoes, what's what you're talking about? Standing in somebody else's shoes.
The law gives us that freedom, but you better be sure.
A huge responsibility goes along with that freedom. That's correct the law. The law says you can, but you are taking on a great amount of responsibility when you when you do that. So something to be wary of. Thanks for the time, my pleasure. Jad Johnson with us of the Talent Training Group. Remember you can learn more.
First, you can just listen to Talent Outdoors. You'll get some of that, but you'll get more than you bargain for. That's for Dog on Shore uh SO Talent Outdoors on Saturdays at ten on this fine radio station You can also stream it on the iHeartRadio app. You can also just visit the Talent Range and just go to talentrange dot com and learn more there about the training that
is available. Forty six past the Hour Tomorrow, Steve Stewart to Tell Asker Ports, Jason Snead on a Selections project, Dr Matthews Adaman in with Optimum Health Naturally and for Doctor David Hearts and uh are on the road again segment. Got a suggestion for a trip for you nearby. As we wrapped the show, this headline just grabbed my attention. It just made me laugh. Reddit user kicked out of wedding reception for ordering pizza when bride's family devours buffet.
I that just made me laugh. And I know that a lot of these scenarios that pop up on Reddit you can't necessarily verify, but I tend to think that this happened or happens because a lot of people just don't have etiquette when it comes to considering others. So you've got a wedding and one of the families or both of the families, they invite people, but they feed themselves first. Now the couple, the bride and the groom should always feed themselves first at a wedding, right, But
I've never been one that thinks that. Like, if I've got the family or family and friends over to my home, I am the last person to take food, unless it's my birthday and then they make me take it first. But if it's a gathering, I am the last person. But put yourself in this scenario. You're a guest at the wedding, all the food's gone, you've been there a few hours, you're staying a few more. You're hungry. So he's asked to leave the reception because he ordered a
pizza delivered. Now, if there was a lot of food laying around and he ordered a pizza, that's bad form. Even if you don't like the food, at that point, you suck it up, eat some of it, and call it a day. And then if you need to leave, you leave and you go get yourself some food. But if the buffet was consumed by the family of the bride or the groom or both, and you're a guest and you got nothing, and you're expected to kind of hang out there. Man, I'm getting food now, I might
not have it delivered. I might run down the corner or something like that and swing on back. But I don't blame the guy. I have total sympathy for his plight, depending on things that we don't know.
Brought to you by Barono Heating and Air. It's the Morning Show one on WFLA.
Today's radio program started in Hebrews ten verses nineteen and twenty. We will pick up there tomorrow on the show. Big Stories in the press Box. Pakistani man with ties to Iran charged in foiled assassination plot allegedly targeting Trump as well as other government officials. The guy ended up with a undercover FBI agent trying to hire a hitman and was nabbed at the airport on July twelfth. That just seems interesting to me. As we talked about with JD.
Another interesting coincidence in the story of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump had a long conversation, good conversation as always with j. D. Johnson of the Talent Training Group. US Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland. A panel in February discussing ways that Congress could invalidate an election victory by Trump at the risk of civil war would be the reason for doing it. That the election of Trump would bring about a civil war. First of all, that's stupid
because that invites the civil war. That talk invites it from the extremists out there, But it just it demonstrates the lengths that people on the left are going to keep Trump out of office. We shared seven absolutely verified and he's nuts. Things about Minnesota Governor Tim Wallas, the new vice presidential candidate for Kamalis run for office. More on the Trump assassination, attempts to cold and the Naval Air Station going to be commissioning the USS McCool on
September seventh. That will be a cool thing to witness. Talked about Amendment four at great length, need to check that part of the podcast out. Talked about some medical things and of course the Olympics as well. We'll be back tomorrow. Friends, have a great day.