Well, now, how in the world are you. It's Tuesday, March nineteenth, and this is the Morning Show with Preston Scott. Good morning. I'm Preston, he's Grant, and it's Tuesday, March nineteenth. We are now into our twenty third year of broadcasting this radio program. I mean technically
that was yesterday. You know, it took me a while for that to just kind of sync in not referencing the show, but birthdays, anniversaries, birthdays and anniversary dates commemorate the year that was and technically begin a new year. So, for example, I was born on June twenty second. On June twenty first, I finish that year. And so even though it's my birthday on the twenty second, it's actually the beginning of the next year.
So we technically celebrated twenty two years yesterday, but it was really the day before that was the end of the twenty second year. We just commemorate it. It's just one of those interesting little things that we do. And so we're actually into year twenty three now, and oh my goodness, good to be with you. Our verse today comes from Galatians five, Verses twenty two
and twenty three. Very familiar passages. You'll hear me these off and on different not just in the devotional portion of the program, but throughout the show, sometimes because it's it's fundamental. But the fruit of the Spirit is and now we're going to stop for a second, the fruit of the spirit. New Testament writers talk about the fruit and the gifts. They talk about them very differently. They are different. The fruit of the spirit. I've always
used this to describe it to people. It is the equivalent of a seat belt, a steering wheel, door locks at this point, a radio, air conditioning power, steering power breaks. Standard equipment. There was a time that some of those things might be an option. Air conditioning, for example, would be an option years ago. Not so much anymore. There may be an occasional vehicle out there where air conditioning is not standard, but that's
not common for someone who calls themselves a Christian. What follows is standard equipment. And so if it's not evident in your life, you need to look yourself in the mirror, take ownership of the fact that it it's not manifesting in your life, and do something about it, because it's supposed to. This fruit, if you will, is supposed to be produced out of your tree. And if it's not, there's something going on in your life that's blocking it. So here's the list. Love, joy, peace, patience,
kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self control. Against such things. There is no law if any one of those virtues attributes fruit. If you're struggling, for example, with being gentle, kind, patient, if you're struggling with any of those, something is stopping you, and that's up to you to figure out and get it out of the way, whatever it is. Don't be robbed, and don't rob the people in your life,
in your immediate circle from experiencing those things in your life. And that's how we'll start our day Galatians five, twenty two and twenty three right here on The Morning Show with Preston Scott, The Morning Show with Preston Scott on News Radio one hundred point seven WFLA. Writing a blog right now to go around a video that I stumbled across a young man. I don't know if he's in Korea, beans Highland, I have no idea, but he makes boats.
He fabricates the shell, puts engines in him, steering devices, and his latest boat looks a little bit like an F sixteen fighter. It's hilariously cool. They show the whole process. If you've ever if you've ever made a model in your life and see, you know what, that's the thing. I bet you never made a model of what of Like going to the hobby store or Walmart and they have this little section of plastic models. They could be World War Two airplanes or boats, destroyers, helicopters, cars,
What about those? Like when I was younger and I was in Scouts, they did those like little pine derbies. Yeah, it's not quite the same thing, but but but that's that's something that's different. The Pinewood derby. Those that was cool. Those are fun times. But I'm talking about you get this this kit. You get a box. You open it up and it has all these pieces that are attached and you have to cut them off the little hangar thing that it's on, I don't know what it's called.
And then you piece it together with modeling glue and rubber bands and you take a little razor. Sometimes there's some sandpaper and you have to file it down, and advanced ones you paint. Sometimes you paint by hand. Sometimes people get it, you know, little mini air sprayers to paint the models. Yeah, I had Legos and Lincoln logs. So when I was a kid, not only did I build models like that, I was huge into World War two airplanes because once I built the model, then I could play with
him. You know, you just that you played, you had fun, you imagined and uh. But then again I also did like the horror movie creatures. I did Frankenstein, the Wolfman, the Mummy. In clued those guys together. It was fun. Anyway, this guy is like this, This young man is building giant models that he thinks of in his own brain, and he constructs them, puts engines in them. And this this air
this airplane, he calls it a seaplane. It's not a seaplane because it doesn't fly, but it almost does because it's it's ripping across the water and it's and he and he shows the process of how he built the thing. It's just cool. Just is So I'm putting that up on the block because I just I'm a geek for stuff like that. I just I admire people that have the brain power to do stuff like that, to just create. And I don't know if he's got an engineering background, he just does this.
It looks like he's just taking a he's taken a ruler, and he's just making stuff, and he's duplicating things for you know, symmetry and function of design. And I don't know if he's just got that kind of brain where he just sees it and does it, or if he's got an engineering
background. I have no no idea, all right. March nineteenth, eighteen thirty one, Edward Smith steals two hundred and forty five thousand dollars from the City Bank in downtown New York, first recorded bank robbery in American history. Edward Smith, huh, nineteen sixteen, first US I wonder if he's got descendants, Like do you think is his d has got to be somewhere. Someone's got to claim that guy, because you're now at a point where you can say, you know, great, great, great great grandpa was the
first guy to rob a bank in America. I'm just saying, you know, I that wouldn't be the most it wouldn't be the most shameful thing to say is in your family tree at this point. I mean, you know, nineteen sixteen, first US air combat mission begins. First aero squadron takes off from Columbus, New Mexico in an expedition to catch Poncho Villa nineteen sixteen biplanes nineteen fifty two, the one millionth jeep produced for the US Army nineteen
seventy one million. Nineteen seventy nine, US House begins televising day to day business on c SPAN. And in two thousand and three, we started our war against Saddam Hussein air strikes in Baghdad. We ended up catching that dirt bag in a dirt hole. So there you go. I'm a little late past the hour. Got an email from a listener. We're going to share. Next blog is up. It's just cool, worth your time. Absolutely. I have a brain that can handle a little landscaping design, and I
guess I designed my desk, So there you go. I could shape a golf shot sometimes, but this is next world with me. We got to talking about west Point's motto last week and changing, and I got a really good note from a to west Point. Served in our military for years and he's been a listener, and I categorize him as an encourager. He listens
to the show, he's thoughtful, has listened for years. I don't know if he's listened for the entire twenty two now twenty three years, but certainly for many of them, he said, morning, preston not taking issue, just trying a little clarification. But before that, know that I am not flying the woke banner and would likely be classified more dinosaur than spring chicken.
I wear all of that proudly. I'm a graduate of the United States Military Academy, so have half a grain of salt in my opinion, at least I like to think so. To change to West Point, the change to West Points mission statement caught me and a lot of other guys now women too, completely off guard. But a little digging and some como from both the Association of graduates as well as the superintendent cleared the waters at least a little
bit. Duty honor country has been and remains central to West Points motto where it has resided, probably since christ was a corporal, an old Army saying connoting a long long time ago. That's funny. Yeah. What has changed is the mission statement, which now aligns with the seven Army values. The core tenants of duty, honor country are subsumed by an integral to some all of these Army values. It's there, but not spelled out in black and white. One could ask why not, or state if it isn't broke,
why the need to fix it? But I digress. Duty, honor, Country was not incorporated into the West Point Mission Statement until the late nineteen nineties, either ninety six or ninety eight. It was not in the mission statement prior to that, including my days as an enlisted soldier in seventy two and seventy four, as a cadet seventy four to seventy eight, as a commissioned
officer from seventy eight to ninety two. My now seventy year old brain faulty as it is becoming thought it had it not only had been in the mission statement during my service, but had always been part of it, back to the beginnings of the academy. Not so that helped me cool down a little. But let's be clear, I do not like the change. I just want everyone to be clear about the facts me. I'd prefer it remain unchanged
from its recent form to include those three core tenants. But as said, it remains as the motto as it has always been, and also remains engraved on my heart and my daily approach to all things and so so from the class of seventy eight. Thank you very much, sir, I replied, I believe you. I will share this without a name. However, you represent an army and military apparatus which no longer exists. They've ruined it.
We are no longer elite. We are compromised. They are implementing continuous incremental change to eliminate our nation's ability to defend itself and to fight here or abroad. Thank you for serving, he said. I appreciate your reply, more so because no doubt you are inundated daily with listener messages. Sadly, with a troubled heart. I agree with your overall assessment, both of our military
and those seeking to emasculate it incrementally or otherwise. I fear for our American future, for our exceptionalism, the global leadership position we can currently leverage and lament that the future for our generations children and grandchildren may see them sacrifice freedom for the false security of ideological or political chains. Certain in my faith, I'm confident the slide will be long enough for me to have stepped off this
rock and cross the river to Jesus. Keep doing what you do. Thank you for your service. We all serve in a variety of ways, but most of all we serve a great master of all men, and you a beacon in that regard. Much admired and appreciate it thoughtful so as it relates to the whole army motto thing fair enough, I trust his comments. Also is analysis, which is something that I think everybody should pay attention to. Twenty eight minutes after the hour, a couple big stories you need to be
hearing about next, and this is the Morning Show with Preston Scott. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it is the Morning Show with Preston Scott. I'm Preston. He's grand Big Stories in the Press, presented by Restore Carp Karen Tile. All right, we have two big stories today. They both revolve around the United States Supreme Court. One we'll see one. You got to be kidding me and I don't get it. So let me say now we
will talk with Matt Staver in the third hour of Liberty Council. Not only is Matt undefeated in front of the United States Supreme Court, Matt can explain things that we might not fully get the grasp of. And whatever news reporting is out there and might be able to help us with some subtleties inside how the Court operates that might help us understand these stories better. But for now, yesterday we told you arguments were going to be made on whether the United
States government coerce social media companies and engaged in censorship by pressuring them. They call it censorship by proxy, silencing free speech by pressuring these social media outlets to limit comments on a wide range of topics that the government doesn't like.
What's interesting is the reaction was, for example, epic Time said, suggested, let me rather than just guess what Epic Time said, let me let me read the headline itself, because it surprised me as it relates to Supreme Court appears reluctant to limit Biden's social administer biden administration contact with social media.
I don't know that that headline reflects the thoughts of those litigating The Deputy Solicitor General for the US argued the White House communications with news media social media did not rise to the level of government coercion, which is prohibited under the Constitution. He said that the government was merely using quoting the bully pulpit to persuade private parties, in this case, social media companies to do what they are
lawfully allowed to do. Several of the justices asked questions on what conduct fell inside and outside the scope of coercion. Justice Gorsich Neil Gorsich cited President Joe Biden's statement that social media companies were killing people with misinformation during the pandemic and asked whether that was coercive. Listen to what Brian Fletcher said in response, representing the White House. This was exhortation. We're at. Yeah, there
was pushback from Solicitor General from Louisiana on all of that. He contended the government used its authority to pressure social media platforms to demote pieces of information it wants suppressed, causing them the routinely cave in response to government interference. I think that's obvious. I think it's just absolutely obvious. They walked away the respondents, those that are actually the plaintiffs in all of this, they walked
away feeling encouraged that the majority will side with them. We'll see. The case that I've really got to hear from Matt about is the Supreme Court rejected the appeal from parents who lost custody of their trans teen Indiana took a child when he was sixteen, a young man. They say it had nothing to do with the family's insistence that the young man adhere to his biological designation. They said it was because of the severe eating disorder. It's a Harbinger case.
It's a big time case, and we'll get to that with Matt stab later. We'll talk more about it next hour. Forty minutes passing. Welcome to the Morning Show with Preston Scott. Sorry, it just came across another jaw dropping decision by a federal judge, not the Supreme Court, but allegedly basing her decision on a Supreme Court ruling. US District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman simply put says that illegal immigrants are allowed to carry a gun in the United
States. Sweet Jesus, I'll go ahead. My mind is just going through just so many like, man, what do I what the heck? What's what's the what's even the takeaway? Right? What's what's the thing? Could it be any more clear that they like won us dead? Section nine twenty two, Title eighteen of US Code bars the illegal immigrants from carrying guns or ammunition federal law. It's going to be like you can see the writing on the wall, right, it's coming. There's going to be a court case
that basically says illegals can carry and Native born Americans cannot. Like you can see it, like the writings on the way. Arming the freaking invaders right right. The dudes they went lawfully in the Yeah, to the credit of the officials involved, they arrested and charged him. The Jets threw it out. I think it's it's pretty clear that their animosity towards us Native born Americans, like they hate us, they want us dad, it's just right there,
it's all right there. They do, they do. They hate everything that we are, and so they're arming the people that will absolutely ravage and rape and pillage and you name it. That's who has the weaponry. Now, if you're and if you're a South Texas rancher and you dare defend your property Arizona ranch, Arizona, you name it, If you dare defend your family against this lot invaders, you're going to jail. Well yeah, yeah,
we'll talk more about this. Remember the nose dive that that plane took on the way to New Zealand. There's so many aircraft stories now, Latin airlines, Boeing seven eighty seven to nine, Dreamliner, La t Am it's a Boeing that that was being flown by the airline. It's a it's a Chilean airline flying from Australia to New Zealand. Does that makes sense? What
a world? Anyway? Remember it dropped and I'm thinking, you know, guy who's taken a little flight training in my lifetime, I'm thinking, okay, it hit a pocket of air and dropped, because that will happen. Oh no, no, no no. A flight attendant serving food came into the cockpit and inadvertently pushed a button that's supposed to be covered. The button man mechanically pushed the seat of the pilot forward, and the pilot a mad now is being shoved into the yoke of the plane. The yoke is shoved
down. I don't know if it disengaged the autopilot. I don't know what was going on, but someone didn't react and that's what caused the plane to nose dive. The serving of a meal and the accidental bumping of a switch that's nuts sent the plane into a nose dive. They called it a technical event during the flight, which caused strong movement. Yeah, I guess so. I mean dozens, nearly a dozen passengers were hurt and needed to be
taken by ambulance to hospitals. They were mostly released one crew member. I mean they were thrown up to the ceiling if they weren't buckled in. But there's there's the takeaway, aside from whatever you carry with you now about fears of flying, here's the takeaway. You know when they say leave your seat belt fastened while seated, there's the reason why you have no idea what's going to happen forty six minutes after the hour Preston Scott Boy, that escalated quickly.
I mean that really got out of hand fast. On WFLA Tomorrow, Charlie Strickland scheduled to join us prepping Part two. Get Charlie's thoughts on preparing for Fill in the blank. I don't know how you categorize the threats and list them in some prioritized order. You know, it's the most fundamental threat, a threat to communications, power, food supply. I mean we're seeing all of those things I think tested, So you know, as we talked
about with JD earlier in the month. That is a series of rabbit holes you can go down and drive yourself crazy, so you do the best you can. I am in an email group, just inadvertently got placed in this email group, and I've just I've followed along and it all started around COVID and one of our guests that we had on a few times during COVID, and the alarm that people had over so many different things, our supply chain, the government, the failure to disclose the truth about the vaccines, which
has been about four years ago around this time. Yeah, and we still have people walking around delusional wearing masks and it's and it's and I feel sorry for them because they've been brainwashed. You can see brainwashed people and it hurts my heart. It just does. I feel sad. But this group has spun into all of these other areas and it demonstrated visually through email how the
rabbit holes go in so many different directions. It can be overwhelming. So anyway, that's coming up tomorrow on the Morning Show with Rust and Scott, but first time for another edition of Stupid Criminal Stories, wherever possible, we do not change names and this sir, comes from Ohio, the Buckeye State, coming strong here Ashtabulah, Ashtabulah, which is what about fifty miles sixty
miles away from Cleveland, northeast. Yeah, Loreen B. Ferrallo fifty five and Karen Kasbaum sixty three not the typical names, genders or ages of people that find themselves in stupid criminal stories. True say that the two women were not related to Douglas Layman, but they lived with him in his home in ash Dobulah. I just love saying that the bank immediately we segued to the
bank. Please say it previously allowed women to withdraw money from Layman's account as long as he was accompanying them, And so on March fourth, when they pulled up with Layman in the back seat, women took out nine hundred dollars because they saw Layman sitting there. And what they didn't know is that Layman had died. The women had taken his body, propped him up in the
car, and raided his bank account right gosh. After they took his accounts the money, they then dropped off the eighty year old at the emergency room. He was already dead, just saying these are senior adults that have a drug rap sheet, including possession of fentanyl. Weekend at Bertiees. Anyone,
All right, let's get right to it. The second hour of the Morning Show with President Scott and Dahlia Ohio, Donald Trump automobile manufacturing rally and said this, I'm head of the United Auto work has never probably shook hands with a Republican before they're destroying. You know, Mexico has taken over a period of thirty years, thirty four percent of the automobile manufacturing business in our country. Think of it went to Mexico. China now is building a couple of
massive plants where they're going to build the cars in Mexico. And think they think that they're going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border. Let me tell you something to China. If you're listening, Presidency, and you and I are friends, but he understands the ideal those big monster car manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now. And you think you're going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans and
you're going to sell the cars us. Now, we're going to put a one hundred percent twerff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected. Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath for the whole that's going to be the least of it. It's going to be a blood bath for the country. That'll be at least it. Okay, So that's what Donald Trump had to say. The term bloodbath was clearly
meant as it relates to the audio industry exactly. Now, let's go to the Sunday programs immediately after this rally took place one day later, and let's start with Susan Glasser, the New Yorker on ABC's This Week. Donald Trump, it seems to me it's very hard. Eight years into this, we
still struggle with how to cover him as journalists. But in a way, the unhinged, rambling rants that you see from the former president of the United States are baked in, and I think in a way we are all desensitized and inured to the extraordinary, remarkable, and vary at times Unamerican and threatening things that the former president is saying. I'm not saying it's easy to understand
how to cover it, but I think we have to cover it. When the former president, who's already incited violence among his followers, says that there's going to be a bloodbath after the election he does not win, he is telling us what he is going to do. Let me just disagree a little because I'm having super twenty sixteen deja vous over the bloodbath news cycle. This is what Donald Trump does. We're sitting here talking about a word that he
used. It four days ago we were all using to talk about what happened at the R and C. It's in headlines about the markets on Wall Street. And now we're not talking about his one hundred percent tariff policy, which is bonkers. We're talking about whether he used the word blood baths, I mean this or that, whether he means violence. We all know what he can do. Ignore it. No, I think very much not. And look, I think the idea that one comment is going to change the minse
of Trump folders. I think we've seen that before. To Sara's point, we've long past that news cycle. But the policies need to be focused on as well, and that's what the campaign is going to be and continues to be about it. I'm sorry. I just have to say something like Donald Trump is attacking in a broad brush sense, the basic pillars of American democracy,
period, full stop. If that's not news to you, It's not about terrorists, that's not the reason why millions of Americans are supporting Donald Trumplett Now, notice the word democracy, sacred democracy. You have to ask democracy into your heart to truly be an American, lay yourself for the altar of democracy. Do it straight me down. So that's the background. What's happening started one day later on the Sunday shows, and so it begins stay with
me ten minutes past the hour mark show with Preston Scott. The mainstream media doing everything humanly possible now to set a new narrative, the bloodbath hoax, the blood bath narrative. You heard Donald Trump in context, just like we played for you what he said on January sixth, just like we played for you read to you what he published on my blog, what he said in Virginia when he was talking about good people on both sides. We context is
everything. And the good news is I've seen the media get relentlessly merciless, mercilessly mocked over the last couple of days, since they're a little melt down there and different meltdowns like it across lamestream media platforms so much so like Elon is tweeting about it and if he can see it clearly, like that's a really important figure, and he tweeted, it is concerning that the legacy press would lie so blatantly, So he's seeing it clearly well. He called out
Joe Scarborough. Scarborough posted something on X about the blood bath and Scarborough pulled it out, pulled it down once. Uh Musk called him out about it. But it's this, it's this common thread. And what I what I did is I went back into my files and I pulled out a Google search from March of twenty twenty one, and what I searched was mass shootings. Oh I remember this, And here are headlines and you might initially think it's the same article. Oh no, it wasn't. Mass shooting surgeon. Florida's
nation faces record high mass shooting surgeon. Wisconsin is nation faces record high mass shooting surgeon. Mississippi is nation faces record high mass shooting surgeon. South Carolina is nation faces record high mass shooting surgeon. New York is nation faces record high. Mass shooting Surgeon, Ohio is nation faces record high. And it goes on and on and on. There were some variations in states where the mass shootings didn't go up. Mass shootings in Indiana fall, but nation faces
record high. The stories were all unique and different. They weren't cut and paste. But these were all run within three weeks of each other. So it wasn't like one story that was grabbed and pushed out, like the Associated Press wrote a story and a bunch of newspapers grabbed it pushed it out. No no, no, no, no, no no no. That was my thought. This was spread out over weeks, and and as I noticed this, I printed it out. I printed out all the headlines, and
I made the prediction on the air, this is this is life. This isn't what I do. This is life. This is just being a sixty At that point, a sixty year old man having observed and watched how democrats, how the media, how they work in coordination with one another, and I said, you mark my words, legislation's coming out. They're gonna they are priming the pump. They're the groundwork with the American people to try to accept this false narrative. Now keep in mind, the entire story, the
entire narrative, was false. And lo and behold, the very day I made this statement, watch legislation's coming. That day it hit. And what that illustrated and it proved my theorem, and that is that Democrats have legislation in mind. They need the media to carry their water and to advance the idea much the same way that you would promote a special for your business in
advance of a grand opening or a special sale. You'd say coming soon, coming soon, coming soon, and you get the buyer aware of this special, hopefully hopefully focused on it. The mainstream media does this. They routinely do what the Democrats asked them to do. They do in coordination. That's why blood bath. It wasn't because Trump said it. It's because now this is a catchy little thing, and the context as long as they keep repeating
it doesn't matter. But they're doing the bidding of the Democrats. They're doing the bidding of Biden, They're doing the bidding of whoever is running the Democrat Party. Don't ever forget this. This is the mainstream media. They're the pr wing for the Democratic Party. I don't know if you caught it, it probably was something that gnawed at you, even if you hate Trump.
Because I'm not a Trump supporter, I'm a Trump voter. I think that distinction matters, and I'm I'm more likely to take the view of I like
what he's done. I guess you could maybe if that's the distinction you're going by, I may be more of a Trump supporter because I like the the archetype that he's filled, kind of that he's not like our guy forever, but he's really just the start of something like there's an entire generation of younger America first guys that are starting to get elected, and none of that would have been possible without Trump coming along and agree with that, blowing up the
Romney Ryan kind of George Bush gop. So I'm appreciative for kind of kind of like the morning star of a greater movement. I think, I when I when I distinguish it, I'm talking about him as a person I understand, and so that's kind of where where I'm at with all of that. That said, I bristle as as I do when someone on on our side, whatever that means misquotes takes out of context, falsely accuses somebody on the
other side for saying something and they didn't do it. It's like there's so much fruit on the tree, you don't have to pick the false fruit. You just don't. You don't need to go there because it discredits the messaging. You know, when they said on that Sunday Morning program and they talked about how Trump we've already seen how he incited violence and his followers, what are you talking about? Did you listen to his speech. I defy anybody
to find me anything that incited violence. We're gonna go down and walk whatever We're gonna We're gonna ask them to be proud and brave patriots. Oh okay, if that's inciting whatever. But what bothers me is how they go so island when they talk about well, you know, those kinds of words can lead to somebody else taking action. We've heard that thought process. What about Keith Olberman? Trump says he has been treated worse than Abraham Lincoln. No
other president he has been treated worse than Abraham Lincoln? Was Trump said that? Trump said that about himself. That's a see, that's just hilarious. Biden campaign account posted Trump says he's been treated worse than Abraham Lincoln, who was assassinated. Keith Olberman tweets in There's always hope. Yeah, guys, he is off his rocker. No, Keith Olberman is a sick, evil,
vile human being. Yeah, he is contemptible. He is still someone that Jesus loves as crappy a human being as he is, and believe me he is. He is a rotten, soulless person. Jesus still died for him. So you can say, first of all, wow, thank you Jesus, because there's still hope for people like that. But where is everybody? Why isn't he banned, suspended from X, from all the platforms.
Why isn't he turned into a pariah that he is by everybody else? I always referred to him as the guy who used to be Dan Patrick's partner on Sports Center, because those were the days when he was really good. He was a good sportscaster, as an announcer and a desk jockey. He was very, very good. I say that with I think a degree of credibility as I judge people in this business. He was very good. And then he got he got the idea that he was something bigger than that, something
more important than that. And what he is is a bitter, angry, vile man. But think about it, where are we holding his side him accountable for inspiring others? This was an overt overt. This wasn't subtle. This was an overt calling and hoping for the assassination of Donald Trump. Where's the outrage? Where is it? I can darn well guarantee you this if somebody says anything like that on the right about say, I don't know Barack Obama or Joe Biden. I don't wish Joe Biden harm, Barack Obama harm.
Their policies are destroying this nation. I don't wish harm on them, and I would have a problem with anyone who does. Like Rush. I don't want them to succeed. I want them to fail. But the opposite those guidelines, they don't work. On the left, they don't hold And I'm going to point it out every time it exists, so that you can point it out to the people in your circle. And this is the Morning
Show with Preston Scott. Thirty six minutes past the hour, We're going to talk about what follows with Matt Staber an hour from now with Liberty Council. He's the founder, lead counsel, and I think I could say, Pastor,
it's an organization that deserves your support. It has ours. We support it, my wife and I. Big Stories in the press Box brought to you by Restore Carpet Karen Tyles. Supreme Court rejects an appeal from parents who lost custody of their trans teen Indiana said the parents, self described devout Christians, lost custody not because of their views on transgender issues, but because of the medical necessity of the teens severe eating disorder. The court declined to decide
whether in Indiana couple should have lost custody of their son without comment. And this is what boy, I think the court needs to explain. Why Why didn't it take the case, Why didn't it intervene rejected an appeal from the teen's parents, the parents warning this is going to keep happening until the court rules, quoting for the attorneys for Mary and Jeremy Cox of Anderson, Indiana.
With increasing frequency, governments run roughshod over parents' religious beliefs on gender identity, including removing children from parents favoring certain beliefs In divorce, custody disputes, preventing adoptions. These cases are sure to proliferate. Indiana said, among other things, not only oh, it had nothing to do with that, it had to do with an eating disorder, that if the child was returned home, the eating disorder would worsen. Well, the child had mental issues.
Anyone who is born male and wants to be a girl, born female and wants to be a boy or male, there are mental issues that need help and intervention. Indiana also argued, well, the child was sixteen, that child's now an adult. That's not the point. This is about whether the state was right in the beginning. This is horrifying. Yesterday Supreme Court heard
arguments on the United States President and his administration pressuring social media. It was going on related to the Hunter Biden laptop story, was going on during COVID, It was during going on during the twenty twenty election aftermath. This has been an ongoing issue and as I'll get to next hour, Google itself has interfered more than forty times with how it's handled things related to elections. The White House pressuring, they say, just using the power of the bully pulpit.
It's coercion. The statements, the statements that Biden himself released were in fact statements that should have caused deplatforming. Those are the big stories in the box. We'll talk more about this next hour with Matt Staver. It's the Morning Show with Preston Scott on News Radio one hundred point seven w FLA manly minute you'll want to pay attention to coming up in just a few minutes.
As I mentioned, next hour, Matt Staver will join us. We'll also talk about that story involved in Google, some numbers that might be interesting to you. Of course, tomorrow in the program, Florida Man Factor fiction as well as Charlie Strickland scheduled to join us to talk about preparing for finish that sentence however you like. That's coming up to my a in the Morning Show. But first we all look forward to hearing more. How about Florida Man,
Well, if you read something insane, I probably did it. Come on, everybody, I'm fat of her. Of the blockers, go ahead and google my name. Now there is no me and to the sins I have committed and we all feel been away, we have somebody whatever to mad Yeah, Brydy, we got one of man we have maybe the mother of all Florida man stories. Melbourne, Florida. Eric Paul Johnson, twenty nine, reported missing by his wife in December. He was allegedly being held ransom
by the Mexican drug cartel, which one we don't know. A woman said she returned home from work and received multiple messages from an unknown phone number demanding various sums of money. This, according to deputies, Johnson led his wife to believe that they were being blackmailed, claiming a man named Troy was stepping in to help them. Messages stated that Johnson would be hurt or would not come home if his wife did not send money to Johnson's cash app account.
Wasn't the first time Johnson disappeared for ransom. Two months before the reported kidnapping, Johnson began frequently disappearing because money he allegedly owed the cartel. As soon as she paid the ransom, Johnson would return home safely. However, the day after Johnson went missing, officers located him after he was captured on camera driving on US one ninety two in Melbourne. During the interview, Johnson said he was the one who sent text messages from an unknown number to his wife,
alleging he was kidnapped because he had a cocaine problem. It also was revealed that he was visiting with another companion, shall we say, when he was reported missing from his wife. Get this, here's the headline. Florida man accused of posing as drug cartel captive extorted eighty thousand dollars from his wife to support his drug habit. Oh my gosh, that is hall of shame material. My goodness, My man extorted eighty plus thousand from his own wife.
And this she married him even though he admitted to having a drug problem. Before they got married, they had dated for a good long while. He was helped in paying his debts by his wife. Talk about a princess. Thinking that he turned the corner and was going to be a better man, she helped him out. That's Florida man. Yeah, a manly minute. More coming up next, it's the Morning Show with Preston Scott. All
right, here we are. This is crazy. The Sun and Fun Aerospace Expo, which is running in April, is going to highlight, among other things, lift aircraft and the single seat Hexa. It is an electric personal vertical takeoff and landing aircraft. You can fly it without pilot certification. They are doing a pay per flight US tour. It's gonna take its mobile location around the country, and they're starting in Florida from April ninth through the fourteenth.
The company's gonna perform air shows and offer customer flights. It's sun and fun. It's gonna then go to Austin, Texas for the month of May before heading to other cities. I don't know if you've seen any of these things. I put them on my blog page off and on over the years. But this is a bunch of rotors on a frame and a single seat and it's controlled sort of like a video game. It qualifies as a Part one oh three ultra light. It's a single three axis joystick and training takes
it out less than an hour. A redundant autopilot aids the pilot during flight. You can switch to what it calls look mom no hands mode. It can carry a passenger up to two hundred and fifty pounds, cruises about sixty knots, endurance of ten to seventeen minutes, durable enough to fly in twenty nine wins, medium rain, and temperatures between zero and one hundred and twenty degrees eighteen independent motors and propellers. Would you do it? Would you give
it a shot? This is what it looks like. I'm showing Grant the picture. Eyeah. Maybe I wonder what kind of disclosure disclaimer it has to have that you sign waiver a long one? Yeah, I would think so. Just saying we're entering the age of the Jetsons, time for a mainly minute mail by birth man by choice. These are skills, virtues, ideals to teach your son. Now we've been talking about the dinner table. This
is a skill. Seriously, this is a skill teach your son when you have guests over, or when you're visiting somewhere, or you're in a buffet line to estimate, like you're at someone's house. You look around and you see how many people are there, and you look at the amount of food that's there. Take appropriate serving sizes. This is crucial because your son is going to get older and he's going to be that guy that can just pile away the food, can just shove a whole pizza in his mouth and not
even think about it consideration of others. Eyeball the crowd observe whether there's backups in the oven. You know what I'm saying. Another dish, another two, three dishes of whatever, and spoon onto the plate appropriately so that everyone gets to enjoy the food before maybe coming back for seconds, wait for the invitation for a second. You know there's more, There's plenty in the back, so help yourself. That's fine, good, but that first serving.
Make sure you teach your son how to be observant of how many people are in the room, estimate servings. These are skills you can teach your son early in life. You can do it with simple demonstrations of crackers and cheese, I mean around the house. Will It's such an overlooked part of etiquette when dining at home with other and having guests, and especially if you've got guests, then you're the last one to serve yourself. But at other places,
always be observant. Teach your son to consider others first, and even in something as simple as this, it makes a difference. There's your manly minute raising men on the Morning Show with Preston Scott the News and hour three is next. We've got an email here from a listener to start Hour number three. Here Tuesday, March nineteenth, on the program and great to be with you, Preston Grant and all of us gather together ruminators and those who
are ruminator want to bees. You just have to give it some time. If you're new to the program, don't wander away. And just because you hear something that might nudge you a little bit or or poke you a bit, don't leave. Stay with us, Stay invested, stay thinking, reason your way through it. Dig you know, we we scratch surfaces here. We don't go deep all that often because that's just not what we do.
Our time is limited, and we just move on through stories. But I got an email here, and the email chain started with this question, Please explain how the Inflation Reduction Act has or will help us. It won't, I wrote back. It hasn't, it won't. It was never designed to, despite its title. She then replies with, is just subsidizing the green movement? What's causing grocery prices to stay so expensive? Her regulations affecting farmers
causing increased prices. Well, sure, but that's not all. It's not just the regulatory environment. It's the limiting of petrol products. It's the environment that we've created with regard to energy. For what we've created with fertilizers, it's the mega farms. Grant talked about yesterday how the mega farms are just taking the small farmer out of the marketplace. The only place a small farmer, a family farm, you know, fifteen hundred acres or less, can
go is to the local markets. And I will say there is a little bit of a cottage industry popping up little co ops and things, forming little farmers markets places where people can come and come and bring their products, and little stores popping up catering to those small family farms exclusively. And so there is a little bit of that still in our country. But it connects to the email, and thank you Debor for writing in Deborah, it is what you say, but so much more it ties to this story. Now.
I still read Flying magazine, I read the digital I still love getting the print edition. I got to resubscribe, by the way. And this was coalition of aviation industry groups raising alarm about the government proposal to increase the federal tax on jet fuel. It's in the twenty twenty five budget, you know, that absurd seven point two or three trillion dollar budget that Joe Biden rolled out, listen to this. Biden wants to boost the current tax of twenty
two cents per gallon to a dollar six by twenty thirty. That is a five hundred percent increase. Why because they want private jet operators to pay their fair share? And what do we do? Yesterday we talked with Scott Beaton Beacon, the founder writer blogger the b Line blog, about fair share and what an absolute canard that is at It's just absurd. The people crying fair share, they're the ones that don't pay their fair share. The wealthy.
It's not the big business they pay more than their fair share. They are likely paying for many other people's share. In fact, that's exactly what the data shows from the irs. But I just wanted to throw this out. What will that do as that tax, if it gets put in place and isn't stopped by a better administration, What will that do to commerce? What will that do? Because the people that fly those kinds of planes, they're not the high end of execs. The people that do most of that kind
of flying, uh huh. And so it all, it all will trick, you know, economies trickle one way or the other. They just do they either the rising tide lifts all boats or we take the water out and all boats sink. Ten minutes past the hour the Google story Now next, Welcome to the Morning Show with Dreston Scott. Sorry, dude, I see you in your leisure suit and I'm thinking John Tribolta when you're busting your moves, Nah and Irish looking John Travolta, even though are you Irish? Are
you Irish English? That's uh if the DNA test no English? Overwhelmingly Okay. This comes from MRC NewsBusters Media Research Center. It's a great site. It's one of the sites that I recommend you follow. They're the people that provide us with the closest thing we've got to the montage is that Rush Limbaugh's staff used to produce on the Rush Limbaugh Show. I not only miss Rush, and I've been encouraged to try to play some Rush cuts from time to
time, not just on special days. And I'm trying to figure out if and how I can do that. That said Media Research Center compiles their rolling tape on everybody and every now and then they'll put together montages and we air them. They'll put together sound and we share that their researchers have compiled forty one times. Google was caught interfering in US elections. Beginning in two thousand and eight, intensifying in twenty sixteen, and continuing now into this year.
Google has repeatedly used its power to help push the most liberal candidates while targeting their opponents. It started with a little nudge for Brock Obama over Hillary Clinton in two thousand and eight, after the Democrats got just blindsided by Trump winning. Remember they were all laughing, everyone was gofalling. Remember the Ann Coulter clip when she was on one of the shows. I don't know if it's Jimmy Kimmel or Jimmy Fallon. I have no idea. They're all obscure late
night now, some better than others in terms of being ridiculous. Kimmel's among the worst. But she was asked, who do you think the nominee is going to be? And she said Donald Trump and everyone almost laughter off the stage. Yeah, I remember, she was right. Culture was right. But a Google execs slipped and said that they were going to work actively quoting
to prevent the next Trump situation. And so, if you remember in twenty sixteen, Google employee, both its algorithm and its partners in a feudal attempt to push Clinton over the finish line. It failed, so then they get to that we got to avoid a Trump situation again. Shortly after the election, the CFO Ruth Porat promised Google employees that the company would use its quote great strength and resources to reach and reach to advance Left its values, Left
its values, and so after twenty sixteen, the censorship began. It's important for you to understand every aspect of election interference needs to be looked at through the prism of Google's promise to do everything in its power to not allow Trump to get elected or anyone like him to ever get elected again. Boy, you need to know that. You need to remember that because there's been clear
interference in the twenty eighteen midterms, the twenty twenty presidential election. Need I say more, Hunter Biden laptop, it picked, it chose, It affected all of the searches. It's suppressed it. I mean, if you just look up certain topics, you're just gonna be hard pressed to find him. Now, I will tell you that even though Google's putting its thumb on the scales of fairness, a big challenge is, okay, just where do you go for searching? I'm told duck duck. I've gone on duck duck.
I'm not certain yet. Have you been convinced about duck duck. No, I've heard some weird things about duck duck from time to time, So I don't even necessarily trust that there's Brave. I don't know if you used that brows. I never heard of it. Yeah, Brave is one that I use regularly daily now, So there's that out there. There are a couple
others. So you just have to weigh and measure. You got to recognize that if you're looking for certain types of news, honest, you don't have to dig seventeen minutes after the hour come back with some numbers that are very interesting. Though I did not enjoy mathematics in school. I was much better at geometry than I was at algebra. Algebra two trig no no no, no, no, no no no, just keep me in the simple math thing. I love numbers, though, because they quantify, and I think
that's why I always gravitated towards reading and writing comprehension. Things like that. The oral persuasive because it tells a story. You know, I was good at math, sure, but I got to those advanced levels and I was like, yeah, nah, I like I like reading more. I like statistics. Always enjoyed that. And again, because it quantifies, you still oftentimes rely on context. But for example, you know, I love the
game of golf. If you look at the statistics of professional golfers, yeah they're incredible, but you'll feel a little bit better about your golf game statistically if you look at the numbers fairways, hit greens, and regulation, et cetera. Numbers are somewhat sterile. They just are what they are. Right now, this is one poll with numbers from Gallup, but I want to I want to share the different headlines of the same pole and just let's just
see what what, what kind of reaction we get out of this. Here's the March thirteen Gallop News release. LGBTQ plus identification in US now, it's seven point six percent more than one in five Gen Z adults identify as LGBTQ plus. That's the headline. Overall, eighty five percent say they are straight or heterosexual, seven point six percent identify with one or more of the groups.
Six point eight percent declined to respond. LGBTQ plus identification in the US continues to grow, with seven point six percent of adults now identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer some other sexual orientation besides heterosexual. The current figure is up from five point six percent four years ago and three point five percent in twenty twelve. Okay, now we go to the New
York Post same poll. Now keep in mind that first set, the first comments there, that's from Gallup. This is the New York Post headline. Number of gen Z who say they are not straight doubles to twenty two percent. One in five women under twenty seven are bisexual. That's inside the polling, but that's what the New York Post is focusing on. Twenty eight point five percent of gen Z females say they are not straight, twenty point seven
percent saying they are bisexual. First of all, I would back up and say, there is your evidence of a social contagent. There is your evidence of how social media and it being trendy impacts because that number is just off the charts. It's just it's it's and explains why zoomer men who are trending
more and more conservative by the day. Yeah, are having a hard time finding spouses because look at the pool of ladies out there who are confused, and and it's just it's so interesting because again, the numbers are just the numbers. Now you can go inside those numbers and say, well, there you go. It it points to how this is a social contagent, this is this is all about you. You'll not hem me in. And then
here's the headline from Breitbart. Pro trans survey admits fewer than two percent identifies transgender. That's Breitbart, same same pole, same same source. Only two percent of Americans claim to be transgender non binary, but that two percent tally also includes people who describe themselves as simultaneously straight and non binary something else. Gallup Pole said, only one percent of Americans identifies transgender. And here's what
I wanted to focus on, just real quickly before we break. It seems a lot bigger, though, doesn't it. When you listened to the mainstream media and look at advertising, you would think they're catering to forty percent of the country, just saying twenty seven after the hour, Matt Staver joins us next to talk about the big stories in the press box. Good morning,
and welcome to The Morning Show with Preston Scott. I'm going to get some expert insight into the big stories in the press box which are brought to us daily. We thank our sponsor, Restore Carpetcare and Tyle, but I thought it was important to get someone's understanding that knows this stuff far better than we do, and we turned to our friend Matt Staver with Liberty Counsel. He's the founder. Matt, Good morning, how are you, good morning. Good to be with you, boy. A lot of stories, a lot
of business being done inside the United States Supreme Court. Let me get your thoughts first on the arguments yesterday. The Biden administration is accused of and I think it's overwhelmingly clear. Engaged in censorship by proxy is the popular term. How do you feel like the arguments went yesterday? Well, I'm not quite sure. I'm cautiously optimistic that the Court will do the right thing because what
we have here is an egregious set of facts. You know, on an everyday situation, if you get whether you're in the government, and this is where Kagan and kevinaw were talking about their experience in the government, or if you're in private and the media writes some false or problematic article. Oftentimes you're going to call the media and you're going to complain. Sometimes they change it,
sometimes they don't. But the difference here is that it's the United States government, and they're not just calling to complain about particular article having the SACS wrong. They're calling to put significant pressure and repeatedly calling, repeatedly, email, repeatedly communicated, and threatening. They're threatening the revocation of their Section two point thirty protection, which protects social media entities from liability. They're threatening that
they would repeal that and that they would expose these companies to liability. So they're using the government pressure and the arm of the government to threaten, intimidate, even to take legal consequences against these entities if they do not censor wholeheartedly a particular person or a particular viewpoint, or a particular subject matter, not just that the facts were wrong regarding something that they wrote about the government,
but about taking certain subject matters, whether it's COVID shots, the lockdowns, the safety or efficacy issues, or the lackthrow of these shots, or the elections or other kinds of things that the Biden administration did not want to have a negative spin on. They really put pressure on them, and they use the power of the government. They weaponize the government against these entities. And that's totally different than the question and the experience that Kagan, Cavanaugh, working
with the government, or anybody working with the media has ever done. So this goes really beyond and I think Justice Alito has it correct when he said, you know, you threatened section two thirty, which two thirty is the section of the Communications Decency Act, and that's what is giving the social media companies liability protection from lawsuits that probably needs to be repealed for other reasons, but they were threatening to repeal that if they did not follow the government's directed
to censor, in some cases take down complete posts of individuals, because they were targeting individuals as well. It's not only subject matters and viewpoints. Matt stand by. I want to pick up right there, and I want to zero in on a comment that the Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher made on behalf of the White House that they were using the bully pulpit. I want to
use that and borrow that for a second. We got Matt Staver with us with Liberty Counsel our guest a few more minutes talking about some things in the Supreme Court. It's the Morning Show with Press in scott forty one minutes past
the hour. Matt Staver with us from Liberty Council. We're talking about a couple of different things, but first we're discussing arguments yesterday on whether the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by pressuring social media companies to censor hosts about a wide range of topics. Matt. They used the argument the bully pulpit. But the pulpit is public. You know, if the president wants to go out and have a speech and say I think this ought to happen, that's
fine. But it's a totally different matter. When you pick up the phone, when you send a note, when you send people to an office, it's not a bully pulpit. It's a private meeting. It's a private communication. Will that have any bearing on the outcome? You think, well, I think you know. That's what they try to argue, that this was a bully pulpit. But this is not anything like a bully pulp as you
mentioned. You know, the bullet pulpit is the president or someone in high office they go out and make public statements, whether it's at the State of the Union or the press conference, or you know, they speak publicly at some event. That's the bully pulplic. And they get out and they push this issue and they campaign on an issue. That's the bully pulpic. That is just rhetoric that everyone hears, and you can take it or leave it.
But this is different. These are private communications behind closed doors, by email, by text message, by phone calls, by in person conferences, by repeatedly harassing, you know and saying you need to work faster to get these things down. You know, you're not doing a good job, and if you don't go faster, we're going to take action. That's not the
bully public. That's using the government as a weapon. And the government has a powerful weapon in the federal government of the United States, to exercise against these companies. And that's what they did, and that is really crossing the line. There's nothing quite like this that we seen. Perhaps it's gone on, but we haven't seen it. And but we have, we've all felt
it. We've all felt our post on social media, even people's personal stories about how they might have been injured or adversely affected by the lockdowns or by the shots or any other posts that are censored or shadow band You realize, you know, you post something about food and everybody likes it, Well, it's not just the subject matter. You post something that's political and then you
don't get very many likes. Is that because nobody's commenting, perhaps, but more likely their shadow banding you and you're not getting the reach that you think you are. I want to get your thoughts on why the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the parents in Indiana without comment, Matt. I feel like they do the country a disservice by not at least explaining why they didn't accept the case. Yeah, it's a common practice to either accept the case or
not accept the case, and they just don't comment on it. It's a rare practice where they do not accept the case and then one or more justices will issue a statement as to objecting why they should not have taken it, or why they should have taken it, or actually, you know, just some other coming as to what's going on with regards to the case, their opinion. So that's more rare. More often than not, what happens is they just deny it. And the reason, I think in part of that
is is because of the volume and because of the historic practice. Historically they don't give a reason why, because it may be a specific fact in the
case. Like in this particular case, the State of Indiana argued that the child had already reached age sixteen, so the case was moot, so the child was able to make decisions on their own in the State of Indiana, and so consequently any recourse by the Supreme Court would be moot because the issue is already in the past and it can't be undone taken for the parents at sixteen, I think you mean he's eighteen now, and so it's mood. Right, that's right, Yeah, it's eighteen now, and so it's mood
he's taking at sixteen. This happened in twenty twenty one, and you know, one of the here's one of the problems is that there's a lot of injustices. The Supreme Court can't rectify all of them. The good news is is that this is not a precedent at the Supreme Court. The bad news for these parents is it's a terrible situation that they are going through and have gone through. But the cases that the Supreme Court are going to take are
dealing with either a federal law. This didn't deal with a federal law or a constitutional provision. It could have constitutional ramifications because of the First Amendment free exercise religion or parental rights. But you know, oftentimes they look deep into the facts of the case and they want to look at is this the kind of case that doesn't have any odd facts like for example, turning age eighteen,
mooting the case. You have this sometimes with graduates prayer cases, you know, the graduation senior praise and they get censored, but by the time it gets up into the courts, they're already gone and say he can't undo that unless there's a damage claim, and there probably wasn't a damage claim that was effectuated down below. So the case is moved. So in that situation,
the court doesn't get involved, but they don't tell you why. What we're seeing, however, and this is what the parents argued, is that this is going to proliferate and we need to have statues on the state level, like Florida is moving towards this direction in other states to protect the rights of parents to direct the education and well being of their children, particularly being
consistent with their religious beliefs. And that is something that has to happen on the state level, and I think that's what the Supreme Court wants to see happen. More so, is that this be addressed on the state level unless there's a specific case that needs to be and can be addressed on the Supreme Court level. As always, Matt, you're generous with your time. Thanks
so much for joining us. Thanks my closure, Matt Staver. He is the founder of the Liberty Council LC dot org's the website fifteen two minutes past the hour tomorrow on the program Charlie Strickland Talent Training Group prepping for Fill in the Blank Part two, Florida Man Factor fiction. More on the unbelievable judge ruling that illegal immigrants can carry a firearm. That's just I can't get my brain around that. But let's end with something. You know, this is
our kicker inside baseball term that's in the media world. A kicker is when a newscast ends its newscast with a funny, lighthearted, interesting kind of story, nothing heavy. It's a kicker. Chick fil A added again more drone delivery. This is different Manhattan seventy ninth and second in the Big Apple. They are they are opening a restaurant and they will open it next week. It is solely toward delivery and mobile pickup orders. No Eden, huh,
no eat in at all. It will only do delivery mobile orders for pickup, uniquely designed for on the go New Yorkers is the first of its kind that according to Chick fil A, it's kind of cool the way that they're doing it, and you would expect nothing less. It's a test concept.
It will utilize geo fencing to make its timing for preparing the orders the customers have placed digitally for delivery or pick up as efficient as possible, so as the person gets near the location, they put the food together and have it bagged up and ready to go, so it's not just sitting there. They're waiting for proximity. And so those picking up the order, whether it's the customer or a delivery person, will have the ability to see the status of
the food using the in store designated screens. So it'll have grant allen and order ready, I don't know, KIOSK five or whatever, I don't bin four, whatever it is, and of course you might remember Chick fil A is another restaurant that it's going to open this year in Atlanta that will have four drive through lanes and the kitchen's going to be above the four drive throughs.
Are there any sitting down options there? I think so, But this is where the kitchen's like right there above, So it's like they're going to throw the sandwich is fries down. If you have a sun roof, even better. Yeah, careful with the shakes and the drinks. Have good hands. Brought to you by Barono Heating and Air. It's the Morning Show one on WFLA. Started the show today with Galatians five, twenty two, and twenty three. It was a good one. They all are, but I
mean yeah. Talk to Matt Staber about the big stories in the press box and of course our thanks to Restore Carpet Karen Tyle for their their proud affiliation with with our big stories Supreme Court stories. Talked about the we've told you bloodbath, blood bath that's going to be the thing for a while. It'll come back in the campaign. Joe Biden. Come on, man, he's calling for a blood bath. You can't vote for that. You just wait and then someone will just say scream and you go. Ice cream. Cockpit
accident that flight from Australia New Zealand. A button was pushed by a flight attendant that caused the pilot's seat to move into the yoke, which caused the plane to nosedive. Just Sam Keith Olberman is hoping that Trump is assassinated. Yeah, we covered a lot of ground today. That's a good way to end the show. Back tomorrow