We are at humpday and it's Wednesday here on the Morning Show with Brusten's backod Morning. I'm Preston. That's Grant Show fifty one fourteen. Grant's over there in Studio one A. I am here in Studio one B. It's March thirteenth. Nothing unlucky about that, because we're together and that's a good thing. Thank you so much for sharing time with us. We begin each each program with a little verse of scripture, and I've got a few apps that
I use. Of course, I've got my standard Bible app that's just the Bible and it pops up averse each day, and then there's then there's another one that our church uses, and the verse of the day from that comes from John fourteen to six. It says Jesus said to him him, I am the Way and the Truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. That's pretty clear, and it poses a stumbling block for many. Our nature bows up at the prospect of being told that this
is the way it has to be. That's just that's human nature in its in its root form. What what do you mean through it has except through you? Oh? Really, who do you think you are. Don't say those words. He's God in the flesh, God's Son. You don't have to believe it. It is completely your choice. You know. I'm always reminded when I think about that, that choice that you and I are given. Of the former Islamist who explained in one sentence why he became a Christian.
He said, in Islam, Muhammad asked me to die for him. In Christianity, Jesus died for me. Expanded world religions, and sadly this includes some faiths that claim to be Christian. World religion is all about what you do. You got to jump through some hoops. Christianity is about what Jesus did. You either choose to believe that or not. You don't get to forge your own gospel. It's what it says. The Bible is a total work, from beginning to end, harmonious throughout centuries of separation. In
writing, they all form a singular story. I tell skeptics often that claim atheists status. First, I don't believe there's such a thing. But secondly I challenge them, Okay, make up your own religion. Go ahead, put the story together that works out for you. Your brain would crash in about an hour. Yet God's story is complete from beginning to end. He is the Alpha and Omega. And so when Jesus says I am the Way,
I Am, the Truth and the life, no one. That's a pretty complete statement, isn't it. No one comes to the Father except through me. Thank you Jesus. All right, ten minutes after the hour, let's come back and peek inside the American Patriots Almanac. Today I will bring to you a guest that will explain the history and the current reality of social security. If you are older, if you're heading there, which we all
are, you might want to listen and take some notes. It's coming up later on today on the Morning Show with Preston Scott twelve past the hour. Also on the program in the third hour, a visit with our lieutenant governor. Does she have an interest in becoming the governor? Is she gonna run after Rhon DeSantis finishes his second term? Talk about some other things with Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nunez. That's later on in the program. March thirteenth, check
out this little piece of irony. In sixteen thirty nine, the oldest institution of higher learning in the United States was named sixteen thirty nine. Harvard was named for a minister named John Harvard. My how the fruit has fallen far from the tree. Historians know very little about John Harvard's life, The son of a London butcher, who was born in sixteen oh seven near the Surrey end of the London Bridge. As a young man, he received his education
at Emmanuel College, part of the University of Cambridge. By the sixteen thirties, his father and most of his family had died of the plague. His inheritance made him well to do, but a member of England's middle class based with religious persecution, Harvard joined a wave of Puritans immigrating to America chance to worship freely. In sixteen thirty seven, he and his wife Anne arrived in
New England and became inhabitants of Charleston, Massachusetts. That same year, he became a teaching elder at the First Church of Charlestown Charlestown not Charlestown, a position that required him to explain scripture and give sermons. But John Harvard did not last long in the New World. A little more than a year after
his arrival, he died. On his death bed, he bequeathed half of his estate and a collection of about four hundred books to a college that had been founded in sixteen thirty six in Newtown, which is now Cambridge, Massachusetts. It was a generous gift, one that helped launch the fledgling college on its mission to educate students in a classical curriculum and Puritan theology. In sixteen thirty nine, the Massachusetts General Court decided to name the school Harvard College,
in honor of the minister. Today, the name Harvard is a good reminder that many of the country's finest universities trace their roots to churches and clergy of the irony of it all. Eighteen sixty eight, the Senate begins impeachment trial
of President Andrew Johnson. Nineteen twenty eight, the Saint Francis Dam gives way on a reservoir four forty miles northwest of Los Angeles, killing four hundred and fifty And in nineteen thirty Clyde Tombaugh and his fellow astronomers at Lowell Observatory and Flagstaff, which is of course, in the great state of Arizona, announced the discovery of the ninth planet, later named Pluto. Which of course was
named after a Disney character. Okay, I'm just kidding. Sixteen minutes after come back and I will explain the significance of the number forty seven as in forty seven percent, forty seven percent, what's that number relate to? Forty percent of parents still financially support adult children in some form or fashion. Nearly half of parents with a child older than eighteen provide them with at least some financial support. However, inside the study, it shows that parents are running
the risk of hurting their retirement in doing so. Inside this study, there's just some interesting things here. First of all, it's not always and we've talked about this off and on over the last who knows how long. It's not always a reflection of a kid being lazy. Absolutely, that's true. In many instances. It is a reflection of how far inflation and the economy have gotten off the rails of normalcy. It is true. When they did this study, they said, look, wages, though higher, are lower
by comparison because of one factor, inflation. If you look at the housing costs for millennials and Gen Z compared to the parents, it's just out of balance. And then there's the cost of student loans again out of balance. So parents step in. They try to help out. On average, some much more so much less. Parents are shelling out over thirty teen hundred dollars a month to help a child or children. Sixty one percent of adult children
still living at home don't contribute at all to household expenses. For some, that would be a way that the parents are helping though, is they're saying, I don't want I'll just buy a few more groceries, don't worry about the electric It's not going to change anything for the mortgage payment, and so that's their way of contributing. I don't know if that's factored in to this
average cost. I've got to believe it is. Fifty eight percent of parents say they've sacrificed their own financial security for the sake of their adult children. Thirty seven percent was the number a year earlier. It jumped from thirty seven percent up twenty one percent in overall percentage, a jump of I mean, you go from thirty seven percent to fifty eight percent of parents that are sacrificing some of their retirement to help their kids. And you know what, I
get it, that's what parents do. Parents. You love your children, You do what you can to help them. You do everything you can to help them. There are a couple of things that stood out to me, though, is the time spans here and when you look at the better part of the last generation, you had illiberals or moderate Republicans. You only had one president since Reagan. Think about this. One president since Reagan has in a fiscal conservative, with the exception of the of the debt, and that's
Trump. George H. W. Bush gave way to Bill Clinton, who gave way to George W. Bush, a moderate at best, good man, I don't doubt that, but he's a moderate. He ushered in spending the budget getting out over at skis the debts starting to start and to climb. Then Obama put it on steroids. Trump comes in, starts rolling things back, and then you get Joe Biden. So if you look at it, well, yeah, that makes sense that we are just out of whack.
We haven't had fiscal conservatives in charge hardly at all in the last forty years. So you can look at this and shake your head. And so some of that discussed is warranted, but really it's just holding up a mirror. This is these are the people we've elected. We've allowed this to happen. Now. I can only hope that at some point the pendulum is going to swing back, and soon enough to make a difference. I don't know
that. I'm not certain about that. Trying not to be a profit of doom, but I don't have the highest of hopes for where things are going. But you still got to try, right, all right? When we come back, we get to the big stories in the press boxes. We continue here on Wednesday. Preston Scott thirty five minutes past got a screenshot from a listener, and so my thanks to Tim who sent this my way.
Comparison of the average monthly payment on a mortgage for a four hundred thousand dollars home, all other things being equal, January twenty twenty one was thirteen hundred and forty nine dollars. It's now twenty one hundred and forty eight dollars, an increase of fifty nine point two percent. That's horrifying. That's what just three years of Joe has done. Big Stories in the press Box brought to you by Restore Carpet Karen Tyle. It's actually a little bit of a theme
here inflation numbers have come out. It is unexpectedly higher in the month of February than what experts and analysts had expected due to the rising cost of gasoline and rent prices close I'm three point two percent from the same time last year, and keep in mind that's three point two percent of prices that are already inflated. Like we discussed yesterday with Howard Eisman. Speaking of Howard, gave
a fact yesterday that I think required repeating today. In the twelve months ending in February, na NC, it's an exchange traded fund that tracks the trades of Democrat members of Congress gained thirty nine point four percent compared to the exchanged rated fund that Republican members of Congress use, which gained only nineteen point nine percent. Amazing that the NANC used by Democrats beat out the S and P five hundred return as well over the same period on a total return basis.
I just point that out because Peter Schweitzer wrote a book Throw Them All Out, where he talked about insiders. In look Republicans at nineteen point nine percent, but Democrats beat that by nearly twenty percentage points. Both sides seemingly benefit from insider knowledge and insider trading. It's just it's so wrong. It is
so wrong. I just I personally, I think the solution to that is, before anybody is elected to Congress, any investments they have have to be disclosed and then managed blindly, completely outside of the purview of any information, any knowledge that a member of Congress gets. I don't know how you do it, but you've got to. You've got to find a way. Before we get to the President's budget, which we will here in a second, it has now come to light that the Biden administration sent a list of names
of organizations to banks for the purpose of monitoring their financial transactions. Mainstream conservative organizations were linked with neo knots and white supremacist groups. For example, the Family Research Council, it's a hate group according to the Biden White House. The Alliance Defending Freedom, same American Family Association. How about Liberty Council listed
as a hate group by the What's that organization? The Southern Poverty I was just gonna say, is it the Southern Poverty Law Center or the ABL or the ABLU the Southern Poverty Law Center. But I'm always curious. Why is it that they only link to white supremacist groups. What about black supremacist groups? What about Black Lives Matter? What about the NAACP, what about the Congressional Black Caucus? What about fill in the blank. We don't monitor them.
I'm just saying, just saying, we get back the unbelievable. Another big story in the press box, looking at the finances of our country, Joe Biden has proposed a seven point three trillion dollar budget for the twenty twenty five fiscal year O m G. Now, when a White House proposes a budget, it's a wish list, we get it. But he wants to deploy. How familiar is this tax hikes on the wealthy and cutting wasteful spending
on big pharma, big oil, and other special interests. This, by the way, is now I was going to say that big pharma, wasteful spending. You get kind of got my interest there a little bit. They created it. Yeah, I know it's always a false flag. They get they keep signaling this stuff. But they know the big pharma, even big
oil, right, they're their friends. And to answer your question from the last segment, what about you know, black nationalist groups or whatever, they know that those people are useful for their regime change and for the revolution. So it's all it's all a false flag. You know that they're not going to actually you know, and it's not hypocrisy either, they're actually just rewarding their friends. They're loyal subjects. They're exactly it's it's like a it's a
it's an older form of politics, like a patronage network. They are any hall, they are garnering loyalty, and so you can just expect them to continue to do that. Federal government expected record annual deficits of more than one trillion dollars each year, which is four percent of the gross domestic product, twenty percent above the fifty your average. That's how out of whack this all is. If the budget ear projections are accurate, the national debt will soar
by fifty three percent in the next ten years. And so that brings us to Joe's budget. Now, let me remind you always, and this has got to become one of your talking points when discussing spending, taxes, taxing the rich paying their fare share, making big business pay their fair share. First of all, the federal government. Let's just focus on big oil,
even though the federal government's trying to think about this for a second. The government's trying to destroy an industry that funds a lot of what the government does because the government taxes the gallon of gas that you buy, each and every one of them, the oil. Forget the petroleum based products that you use every single moment of every single day. Forget that. But you've got to always remember and pass along to anyone you're talking to. Businesses don't pay taxes.
People do the taxation. Whatever Joe wants to raise taxes on businesses from twenty one to twenty eight percent corporate income tax. Remember twenty one percent, I still think is too high. Trump brought it down. And what happened, businesses repatriated their money back into America from overseas because it was it was finally competitive to do business here. When a business gets taxed a penny, that penny is subdivided into the price of every single thing they sell or market
everything. It is a cost of doing business. Nobody, no business puts a price out there and says, all we got the taxes on our end. Oh no, no, no, no, no no. And that's why this is a canard. It always has been. It's it's how democrats try to argue and make sense of their points to low information and shallow information voters that don't take the time to learn forty six pass on the show. Rundown I wrote these letters H M M as in M story that's been reported
a lot of different places. Charleston County Coroner John Barnett, sixty two, Who is he well? John Barnett had been answering some questions in court and was due to answer more questions in court. Mister Barnett was employed by Boeing for over three decades before retiring in twenty seventeen. He worked as a quality control engineer at the company. Two years after retiring, Barnett told the BBC that Boeing would rush to get its seven eighty seven Dreamliner jets off the production
line and in doing so compromise safety. He alleged the emergency oxygen systems that were made made for seven eighty sevens had a failure rate of twenty five percent. That meant that a quarter of the seven eighty seven Dreamliners had the potential to rapidly lose oxygen if the cabins were suddenly decompressed, which would in turn suffocate passengers. He encountered the issues when he began work at Boeing's North Charleston plant in twenty ten. He raised concerns to managers, but did not see
them take any action at all. Mister Barnett was testifying in court and was cross examined by Boeing lawyers and his own attorney. He was supposed to come back to court to answer questions, but he did not appear as was planned. He had parked his truck in a hotel parking garage and he shot himself
in the head allegedly. Now a lot of people are you know, he had answered questions, he had made reports, he had made the claims, he had offered testimony, and a lot of people are saying, why in the world would a guy who was planning on shooting himself in the head not just go ahead and finish the task. And then if you're going to offer yourself whatever, off yourself. I'm not trying to be dis you know, cavalier about it all, but if someone's going to do that, they're going
to do that. Others have suggested he was clintonized. I don't know no way of claiming I just I wrote on the rundown. Hmm. Then there's this story an engineer for Google, former software engineer, Lynn way Ding. That's that's my man's name. He went by Leon Leon Ding. He has been indicted on charges of stealing AI trade secrets from Google and passing them on
to Chinese companies. He's a Chinese national, thirty eight years old, facing four counts of theft of trade secrets, arrested in Newark, California, with the help of the FBI. It's just an interest. It's a story that makes me go hmmm. Plus, I mean, how do you how do you pass up a story with a guy named Lynn Waye Ding? I mean, you just you can't walk past that story. That's all I'm saying.
There's just certain things. It's like there's certain things on the roads. You just you look, we do. There's certain names that in a story. In the first line, Lynn Wade Ding, I'm reading that story. I know I'm a child. When we come back, it's happening by passed the hour at second hour of the Morning Show with Prussian Scott Politico, Florida just pushing out a headline Florida breaks for a wave of Haitian immigrants. Oh boy,
welcome to the second hour of the Wednesday program. Next hour, we'll talk social security and everybody that is in retirement age, nearing retirement age, anybody that has a job and pay Social Security taxes. You really need to listen to what I'm going to share with an expert from Heritage Foundation, Rachel Gressler. This is what she studies. She's an expert on social security. We're going to talk about the history. We're going to talk about the challenges.
We're going to talk about realities. We're going to talk about are there any solutions? Not sure that there really are to save it, but we'll get through all of that. I wanted to I wanted to share something here there is there's a real concern with what Joe Biden is uh is planning for the next election. This from Fred Lucas of The Daily Signal Heritage Foundation.
He's been a guest on the show. The Biden Justice Department continues to claim presidential privilege to block release of its strategic plan to turn out the vote it excuse me, let me read that again. The Justice Department of Joe Biden, Gerrick Marlin or Merrick Garland continues to claim presidential privilege to block release of its strategic plan to turn out the vote. Why would you not share what you're planning to do if it's legal and above board? But the US Attorney
General is blocking a freedom of information request? What are you planning now? That is interesting and problematic all at once. In a speech in March earlier, just ten days ago, Merrick Garland said voter ID and other election reforms were discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary. The Justice Department fight back against such measures. Inside Biden's secret get out the Vote plan, the Department of Homeland
Security registers new voters during naturalization ceremonies. It's not clear what else DHS. What is the Department of Homeland Security doing with voting? Wait? Where's the intersection here? Oh? Illegal immigrant immigrants? Immigration? You see? Lucas is reporting. The Daily Signal has reported that federal agencies are working to carry out Biden's order on voting with liberal advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties
Union. They're handing out information to people that are illegally in to this country on how to register to vote. Oh but wait, there's more, and there's an interesting piece of sound between Jerry Nadler and then committee member Representative Mike Johnson, now Speaker of the House, that I want you to hear, and that's next Wednesday in the Morning Show. Preston Scott, do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth? On news radio one hundred
point seven DOUBLEUFLA. I'm not sure what committee this is, but this is Jerry Jerry Nadler chairing a committee. Now Speaker Mike Johnson has just been given his time. And listen to this exchange and pay very close attention to what Nadler says at the beginning in response to what Mike Johnson says, and then what Nadler says after an aid whispers in his ear. Later it's late. It's almost ten o'clock. I don't know. I think we've been at this
for about ten hours and it's been a long day. We had a twenty two vote series, not complaining, just explaining why we're all a little bit haggard. But I tell you what, it's the issue that's really got has worn out, and I just genuinely wanted to ask a question of my colleagues here because both of you are here in good faith and I respect you as individuals, and I want to ask you a question of what my constituents asked
me. Could the Democrats in charge, and certainly Democrats here with jurisdiction over the border, could they really be in favor of an open border? And I'm asking you honestly and in good faith. Can I ask, mister chairman, you're from New York. Thanks to New York City's Council, beginning January ninth, twenty twenty three, more than eight hundred thousand non citizens will be eligible to vote in municipal elections in New York. Is that you agree with
that policy? No? No, non citizens will not be eligible to vote in New York. They never have been. Well, they were prior in the nineteenth century, eligible to vote in New York. No, this is a recent action. It was. That is not correct. Non citizens have not been eligible to vote in New York or as far as I know, in any other state since the nineteenth century. That's not true. The New York City Council voted in December to allow this. It begins January ninth,
twenty twenty three. Cities in Vermont and Maryland already allow this and similar measures are under consideration in Illinois, Maine, and Massachusetts right now. It's a gentlemen of you. Yes, I believe those are considerations of allowing votes in municipal elections only, right, but thank you. That's the point everybody wants to know at home. Why would they allow this? Guys, They're allowing
it because they're going to turn them into voters. They already are doing this in New York City, largest city in America, and this is the plan of our friends on this side to turn all the illegals into voters. Now, hold on. At first, Nadler says, that hasn't happened since the nineteenth century. Then a guy whispers in his ear. Mike Johnson says, no, that's not true. That's that's a that is dishonest. That is a lie. It continues. That's it, folks, that's what's going on.
That's the game. That's why the border's open. That's why they've dropped it. Look, I mean I respect that Jess Loughren and all her work in this arena. Yes, oh yeah, miss chairman. I love to hear what you have to say about this. As a New Yorker, I would love to think that New York is the entire country. But it is not. It is not, And consideration is being given to permitting non citizens to vote in New York. And I believe in in the capital city of
Vermont. I forget which that is, but it, as much as I'd like to believe it, New York and Vermont are not the entire country. But mister chairman, that's the point. This is what's going on. Folks at home, if you're trying to figure this out, if you're scratching their heads, you're seeing the video. You see droves of people, two point four million people coming over the word are illegally. The President allowing the Democrats
in charge of Congress are allowing it. The deal is they're going to turn them into voters. You just heard it. They don't have any problem with that, and they celebrate it. Here's the deal. We have a problem with it. The Constitution has a problem with it. American elections should be decided by American citizens. That's it. That's what this is about. That's why we're jumping up and down and screaming. My friends on the video who
are commented about this, that's why we're so upset. Because our constituents are frightened that we are losing our country, we're losing our security, or losing our sovereignty. Is we're going to allow people from one hundred and sixty different countries around the world to come in here and decide our elections. Now we get to the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, who received a letter from Mississippi SI Secretary of State Michael Watson, and he's pointing out the efforts that the
Biden administration is going to to try to register illegals to vote. It is happening. That's the sole purpose behind the open borders, to get enough illegals voting to get get it done, get it done before any legal challenges can take effect. It's too late. Now. That's why this matters, folks. That's why American sovereignty matters. I got nothing in the way of an
explanation for why FSU baseball is unranked. They won't be after this week, should the week go, but they now, look, it doesn't matter. You just keep playing and winning games. You're gonna be ranked when the season's over. But US fans, we like our respect and look, Florida was ranked eight top five before when the season started, they were ranked number four when they started losing some games. All I know is FSU smoked them in
Gainesville last night, twelve to five twelve. I think I misspoke earlier, but in my newscast the official score was twelve eight. So they had eight. Okay, had some late runs, but it was pretty wide pretty early the run difference, so they got some runs off of the bullpen. Okay, fair enough, but still I can't tell you why I foes unranked. They're unbeaten, and again they're playing decent schools. The ACC schedule will be
a gauntlet, but they're playing decent schools. I wanted to share. Came across this story on ways to save money operating your vehicle, just some random thoughts here. They say skip the fuel additives. Now there's some people that swear by them. Adding that jug of whatever, that little twelve ounces or sixteen ounces of something to your fuel. Well, at two to two dollars, three dollars to twenty six bucks, that's what those additives cost. They
really don't make much of a difference, according to experts. Keep the tires inflated. That's that one slips by everybody because you're you know you're counting on. If you have a newer car car, you're counting on the little light telling you that your tire's low. But you need to know what is the right pressure for your tires for your vehicle, But keep them inflated properly. Interestingly enough, your your credit score matters. There are two ways your credit
score matters with the cost of your car. One insurance. Yes, your credit score matters with your car insurance. Two, if you're financing your car, your credit score matter is obviously there because you'll qualify for better terms. Obviously you can maybe not get tickets, so drive a little bit smarter. Here's one that a lot of people are waking up to. If you have a fender bender, it might be smart to take care of it yourself.
If you nudge another person's car, maybe don't pull out the insurance cards, offer to pay for it and take it to a few places, get some bids, and just say, hey, I'd like to just pay out a pocket for the repair. Same thing for your own car. If your car's dinged and you're left in a parking lot, if it's just a small minor thing, fix it yourself. Because filing a claim could jump up your rates. It's not. It's it's a regrettable part of the insurance environment that we're
in. Sometimes failing to file a claim is in your best interests overall, because your rates will go up. I had to do that once just because it was a minor thing, and I interacted with the person. I was like, hey, I'll just take it to the place I trust they can do it pretty cheap and ended up being only seventy five bucks. And this person kept their word, and you know, venmowed me the cash. So if you live in a high trust society, in a civilzation where you believe
you can do, that might be to your advantage. Absolutely. Yeah, if you are ensuring a teenage driver, it's tough. The average rate for a teenage driver is one hundred and sixty one percent of normal rates. So what you need to know is discounts for grades for you know, driver's ad for low mileage oil changes. It's not every three months and three thousand miles
anymore, it just isn't. The normal rule of thumb is about four to five thousand miles some depending on the car, and the oil is fifteen thousand. You save money there There is insurance available on a per mile basis, so you can check that out. If you don't drive your car very much, that might be a way to save some money there. And then there are online defensive drive courses which can maybe lower your rates. So there's just
a handful of ways here we are helping you save cash. Because when we come back, we're going to hit you between the eyes on just how bad it is as we look at the big stories in the press Box here in the Morning Show with Preston Scott with Preston Scott, thirty five minutes past Big Stories in the press Box, brought to you by Restore Carpet Cairtyle. Yesterday, Howard Eisman shared this little nugget, and because we recently had Peter Schweizer
on the program, I just thought it was worth highlighting. In the twelve months ending February twenty ninth, twenty twenty four, nanc An exchanged traded fund that tracks the trades of Democrat members of Congress gain thirty nine point four percent to a gain of half that by the Republican members of Congress. But let's just back up for a second, and I know what some people are going
to say Democrats are just smarter when it comes to investing. No Democrat members of Congress seem to be mysteriously amazingly gaining more benefit by being in Congress than others. I just I think that's worth mentioning. Inflation ran hotter than expected in February. In fact, inflation rose three point two percent in February compared to a year ago, and those prices were inflated. So your actual inflation. I don't know how you do it with a mathematical principle, because that's
not my strong suit never was. I just know there has to be a way to come with a real inflation index number when you factor in how much inflation has taking place under Joe, and now you're inflating the prices of the inflated prices by a higher margin than what was expected. Inflation unexpectedly ticked higher in February. Oh you think unexpectedly, says who says the uh? The market analysts that are begging for Joe Biden to stay in office thanks to a
jump in the cost of gasoline and rent. Hmm, you don't say. Meanwhile, interest payments that our federal government will be making with your money again we we have this mindset where the government has its its own source of money, and it has its own bank accounts, and it has its own You are the bank. You are the source of money. It has no money except that which they take from you. They extract from your paychecks, they extract from your your your purchases. Think about that. What a racket they
The federal government makes money when you buy stuff. The federal government makes money when you make money. The federal government makes money on all ends of the racket, and you might not know it. I'll be curious to hear what
Matt Staver has to say about this. It has come to light that the Biden administration provided a list of hate groups for major US banks for the purposes of monitoring financial transactions in the wake of j six, twenty twenty one, and they lumped organizations like the Eagle Forum, Alliance Defending Freedom, the American Family Association, the Family Research Council, and Liberty Council. Our friend, Matt Staver. They lumped them in with the Ku klux Klan, Neo Nazi
groups and the like. I'm curious that the Biden administrations all worked up over white supremacist groups. They did they put the names of the Black Lives Matter, the Black Panthers, the New Black Panther Party, the Black Congressional Caucus, the NAACP. These are as they define a racist organ These are more racist than any of the groups they're listing, save neo Nazis and white supremacists like the Klan. They're just the other side of it. Is there such
a thing as black supremacists monitoring? No, No, there's not. Forty minutes past the hour, This is the Morning Show with Preston Scott Everything you need to know about Social Security. Next half hour, Rachel Bresler of the Heritage Foundation will join us. She's an expert. This is what this is her study. This is what she focuses on, among other things. But she's an expert on social security. We will talk about it the history.
We will talk about its solvency or lack thereof. But I promised I would come back to this. It's a piece written by William Jacobson. He's an attorney, he's a Cornell Law School professor. He's a blogger. And here's the headline. He writes, most people don't realize how bad the situation is. In medical schools worse than in general. Higher ed medical school education is in crisis, with social justice and race focus activism being imposed on students,
faculty, and staff. He said. There's a database they put together called critical Race dot org. It's a database of medical schools. It's received widespread media attention, including an article July twenty twenty three after they documented what's happening at all one hundred and fifty six US based medical schools, quoting the racialization of medical education has created a national emergency because many of America's future doctors are
being inundated with critical race theory and diversity, equity and inclusion. According to the founder of Critical Race dot org, which course is William Jacobson, it monitors CRT curricula and training, and higher education and has expanded its medical school database to include all one hundred and fifty five accredited US medical schools, finding a staggering seventy percent provide mandatory or voluntary CRT related course work or training for
students, quoting to the extent to which CRT DEI and related programming has worked its way into medical schools, it's truly shocking and worrisome. Racial and other activism should not be the focus of medical education. The ideological capture of over two thirds of medical schools demonstrates it has become part of the fabric of medical education. We are training future doctors to look at patients through a racial lens,
with potentially frightening consequences. Now, look, training doctors to look at things that are unique to races and ethnicities is not what we're talking about. There are things that, for example, black Americans deal with at a higher rate than white Americans. He goes on to say, it's often said the collapse happens slowly and then very suddenly. Medical school education is slowly collapsing, but it's not too late. We need to stop the CRT DEI medical agenda
before that collapse becomes irreversible. In July twenty two, he argued that the national alarm should be sounding over the racialization of medical school education. Ben Shapiro posted a thread where he said, and I quote DEI could get you killed in the operating room. I'm merely pointing out a problem with medicine today, or on the airline, or on the name a high ten, highly stress, highly engineered type job. Yeah, it could. We are fomenting racism.
We are creating a breeding ground because that's all we're focusing on. It's all that's being talked about. I remember Morgan Freeman's great line, you want to end racism, quit talking about it. Gave the interview to CNN or sixty minutes or something. He said, quit talking about it. I don't have a problem with it. People I know don't have a problem with it.
Stop focusing on it. Good mon on News Radio one hundred point seven WUFLA quick reminder to those of you that are in the Tallahassee listening area and took part in our Orphan Shade fundraising. We raised funds to build a home home is nearing completion and then to support the home. If you're anywhere on that list, you received an invitation to a meet and greet with with the co founders of Orphan Shade and me. We're gonna do a little meet and
greet, and you've got the information. I'm just I'm nudging you and reminding you that the meet and greet's coming up quickly and the deadline, the RSVP deadline is Sunday. We need an official count on Monday next week. So if you're thinking about going or if you've forgotten to RSVP, you need to do it post haste. You've got the details that they've been emailed to you. They've been mailed to you in a postcard. If you want to come, we'd love to have you. You're not going to be hit up asked
for more money. This is an update on what's going on. And for the Shurloas to meet you. They just want to say thank you. They're coming in town to say thank you and to just update you on the project. I told you when I introduced you to the project Orphan Shade and to Jay and Stacey that they were just they were different in how they handled things, and that's what I've heard time and again. Wow, they sent me an email thanking me right away, and I've been updated along the process.
Yeah, yeah, that's that's what's going on. And oh, by the way, we're already at work determining what we're going to do this giving season this fall, and I'm getting excited because i think I've got a lead on something that'll be familiar but not and so it'll be it'll be cool, and so I'm looking forward to that. And so again, if you are an Orphan Shay donor in the area. The meet and greet's coming up in a couple of weeks and we want you there, but you got to r s
VP. It's time. It's Wednesday. Still deciding if this is a feature that's going to last, but for now I just think it's fun. It's called Florida Man Factor fiction. I'm gonna read three headlines, and you got to decide which of the three headlines is the true and accurate headline for Florida Man and occasionally it's a Florida woman story. I will readily admit what's interesting about these headlines is they're all possible when you think of a Florida Man,
but only one makes the cut. Headline Number one Florida Man impersonates FBI agent leaves catfish on homeowner's lawn. Florida Man headline two, Florida Man tries to avoid court appearance by claiming he has a bola Florida Man story. Three headline Florida man chops off on pinky finger in drunken dare at bar oh dad Gum. Which is the Florida Man story. I'm gonna go with number one,
Florida Man impersonates FBI agent leaves catfish on homeowners lawn. Final answer number one, No, it's Florida man chops off off his own pinky finger during a drunken dare at a bar. Unbelievable. That's what you get with Florida man. Right, think of what had to be What did he drink and how much before he said that's I'll do it. That seems like a tequila Dare you think I wouldn't know, I would have no clue whatsoever? And how do he do it? Did he use like a meat cleaver of my shady
and axe scissors? Doh man. All right, we've got the the third hour Everything you need to better know about Social Security next to The Morning Show with Preston Scott. Third hour of the Morning Show, Good Morning. It is a program five thousand, one and fourteen. If you're new to the show, yeah, we've been at it a while, and we are grateful that you are sharing time with us, whether you are in the terrestrial broadcast
area or listening across the country around the world on iHeartRadio. Thank you very much for making time. I promise it will be worth it. I came across some misinformation some disinformation on social security, and I knew that I needed somebody better than me to explain where social security is how we got where we are, and so I reached out to our friends at Heritage Foundation. I said, I need an expert. I need Rachel Gresler with us, and
she is here. She is senior research Fellow Workplace and Public Finance and the Row Institute. And Rachel, thank you for making time for us this morning. How are you. I'm doing great things. I need to give people an overview of the history. Where did social securities start and why? Thank you for wanting to talk about this and to start at the beginning, because I do think that that's important. So social security started in the wake of
the Great Depression, when many Americans had lost their entire life savings. So it started as part of President FDR's Economic Security Council, and they recommended that there'd be some form of retirement program so that younger generations would not be financially responsible for older generations if they lived long enough that they had outlived their savings and were no longer able to work. So it was intended to be a
relatively small anti poverty program. People would pay into it they'd get a benefit out in the future, but it has grown massively over time. The benefits now are about three and a half times what they were to begin with.
Life expectancy is also about three and a half times what it was, and so over time, instead of it actually being a program that people contribute into and then the money waits there and earns a rate of return from treasuries and is there for them a retirement, what's actually happened is that Congress has spent all those contributions, those payroll taxes that we all pay, and they've essentially borrowed them. Now we're the point that go ahead, go ahead, go
ahead. We're at a point now and for the past thirteen years, that the program is actually paying out more than it's taking in every year. So we're already starting to have to pay back those amounts, and starting in twenty thirty three, the program trust fund will be insolvent and we'll only be able to get the benefits that are coming in each year. True or false? Did FDR intend on this being a program in perpetuity or was it designed initially
to have an end date? I believe it was designed to be in perpetuity, but it was designed so that at one point the first generation of recipients would get more than they had paid in, but that that would be made up over time, so that it would not be as it is today it pay as ego system, where every dollar in goes immediately out to pay current benefits. That was not intended. Yeah. I remember the day that I
told my mom. It was the nineteen eighties. My mom has since passed away, but I said, Mom, all your Social Security money is gone. It's been spent. And she looked at me like I had just shot her best friend. She didn't believe it. And that's something that I think most people that are older don't fully understand. They thought it was a savings
account. It is anything but that exactly. And that's really important to start there, because that's why reform is so difficult, because everybody feels like you're taking something away from me that I put into this account and it's there,
and that's just not the reality. And that's why we want to kind of shift out of Social Security being such a big program, because the fact that it didn't go into an account that actually earned a positive rate of return is what has stripped people of having hiring incomes in retirement because today, ten years from now, our benefits are a percent on what policymakers in Washington are willing to take out of retirees, kids and grandkids pay checks. It's not like
rate of return is earning. That's simply how are you willing to take from workers to pay to current retireing Rachel Gressler with us. She's with the Heritage Foundation. She's a senior research fellow. Rachel's stand by your phone's breaking up on us a little bit. I'm hoping that the cell towers will cooperate. And again, it could just be a plot to keep the truth from being
spoken. I don't know. I'm just saying we'll be back more with Rachel next The Morning Show with Preston Scott just about twelve minutes past the hour, the truth about Social Security this morning, and we are just this is sixty thousand foot view stuff. This is, you know, getting outside the trees, taking peek at the forest. In the time we have with Rachel Gresler
with the Heritage Foundation. Rachel, I'm gonna make the statement that I've made at nauseam for the twenty two years I've done this program, and people don't believe me. But I feel that it's incumbent upon folks to understand this, despite the fact that it might be political suicide. The fact of the matter is Social Security is not a guaranteed benefit. Congress, if they wanted to, could stop paying it. They're not obligated to pay it. Correct,
That is correct. There we have no true entitlement to Social Security. And that was actually a decision of a Supreme Court case. I when I heard Nancy Pelosi years ago say it's a guaranteed benefit, No it's not. And even the Social Security website uses the word guaranteed, and that is a lie. It is a lie. And that's the problem with a lot of Social Security and some other predominantly one define benefit pensions. We talk about these paying
a guarantee, but the guarantee is really just whatever is left there. And today we can count seventy five percent of what Social Security today pays to actually be there for anybody who is fifty six or younger when they retire. All right, let's let's set the actual lay of the land here. What is the status of the account, what's in it? What? What are the unfunded portions of this where we what are we looking at? So Social Security is notional trust fund, there is actually no money in it, but it
will be insolvent. There will be nothing left, no right to even reclaim past borrowing, beginning in twenty thirty three. At that point, benefits would be cut across the board by twenty three percent. That's the status quo. Congress does nothing, So that's about a five three hundred dollars cut per year. If we want to avoid that, what do we need to do? Well? Social Security has promised about twenty two point four trillion dollars in unfunded
obligations. So if you think twenty true trillion, what does that mean? But break that down to per household level, that's one hundred and seventy two thousand dollars for every household in America. That is essentially the cost of keeping the program as it is today, no increases and benefits, just maintaining current benefits. In terms of taxes, the tax today is twelve point four percent.
Depending on whether you use Social Security or the CBO, that tax needs to rise to about fifteen point eight to seventeen point five percent, So that's an extra roughly thirty eight hundred dollars per year potentially for every household to have to pay in Social Security taxes if we want to keep the program as it is today and have no benefits cut. That's staggering. And I think people listening right now are either they're turning off their radio because they can't believe it,
they don't want to hear anymore, or they're vomiting. I mean, there is no bright side of this story. There's not. And that's a difficult problem when I'll start to talk about reform and they get criticized saying you're going to cut Social Security and you want to throw a gram off the cliff. Well, the reality of the program today is that everybody gets a significant benefit cut if something's not done to reform the program, And so talking about
reform is actually preventing those much larger benefit cuts from happening. Are those much larger tax increases. The longer that we wait, the bigger that the consequences are. That twenty two point four trillion dollars back in twenty ten, it was only five point four trillion. Had policymakers taken action, then the cost of reform would have been so much smaller. Rachel's standby. We're going to pick up there. We're going to look at possible reforms, what makes sense.
I know what I recommended years ago, which of course no one's going to listen to. I mean, who am I? I don't know. But Rachel Gressler's smart and so she's going to bring some ideas to the table. Next she's with a Heritage Foundation. Our guest, she's smarter than you, She's smarter than me. She's talking social security on the morning show. We're just chatting away, but break Rachel Gresler with me from the Heritage Foundation. We're talking social security. All right, we've broken the bad news,
we've bust the bubbles, we've depressed everybody. Now, what are some realistic reforms that could take place if there was the political nerve to do it? Rachel, Yes, And social Security is actually relatively simple and straightforward to solve. It's a lot easier than Medicare. And so you just kind of go back to the basics of the program and what were its intense and try to get back to those original purposes. And that includes protecting people from being in
poverty and old age when they're no longer able to work. So you start with shifting the benefits. I would move towards a universal benefit based on the number of years that you have worked and contributed to the system, because when you think about it, it doesn't make sense for a social insurance program to pay the highest benefits to the people who have the highest earnings, and then we'll end up with the system in which the lowest income earners might still be
living in poverty while getting that Social Security benefit. So if you gradually shift down benefits at the top, and you actually increase them at the bottom, in you know, three four decades from now, everybody who's worked the same number of years earns the same benefit, and it's something that keeps you out of poverty if you have a full career. And then you address the fact that people are living longer, and so you index the age of eligibility to
life expectancy. You can use a more accurate inflation measure that gets you to solving the program and actually saving money. So Social Security takes twelve point four percent of everybody's paycheck today, well originally it took two percent, and the founder said, this will never take more than six percent of your income. So we've got to get that back so that people can actually have some money left over in their paychecks to save on their own and that actually gets to
the second step. Yes, So let me ask you, well, let me ask you a question before you get to step two, Rachel, what would you say to those out there, because I can hear the ruminators of this program thinking, yeah, but I had more taxes taken out of my paychecks. Yes, I earned more money, but I also had more money taken out Yes, And then I hear that and it is a bad deal.
That is the reality of Social Security today. And that's why the people who are close to retirement there's going to be very little change for them. But it's going to be the younger generations who are just starting off to work today who are going to be into this new system. And by being in a system that has a lower benefit, you're not going to see that twelve point four percent go up to seventeen point five. Instead, it's going to
go down over time to ten percent. So yes, you're going to have a smaller benefit, but you're going to pay significantly less in taxes over your entire career. And by the way, if you don't love this system,
you can have an opt out wherever you are in your career. You can say, look, I've earned some type of benefit whatever's payable to date, but going forward, I'm not going to earn any more benefits, and I'm going to get to take my portion of the Social Security tax that half of it paid by the employee, and that's going to go in my own personal account, similar to like the government's thrift savings plan, and you're going to
actually earn a positive rate of return. And the result of that, for probably nearly every American is going to be that you'll be better off having half of your money earn a rate of return than having all of it go into Social Security. What about the employer's portion under this proposal, do they continue to contribute or are they then alleviated of the burden. Under our proposal, they would continue to contribute, and that would go towards making the program solvent.
It's a bit of a buyout saying I'm still willing to contribute into this program, but I just want to take at least my half of the tax with me, and I think I can do better off, and most people can and that over time, and that's a part we did talk about in the break that that needs to be considered. If we don't do something and we have to raise payroll taxes, that is going to create more and a significant pressure of inflation on the economy. Absolutely, it is because employers are
going to be paying more. Employees are going to have smaller paychecks, even if it's costing employers more to pay them, and the results of that is that they actually are going to reduce overall wages and it's just taking more out of the economy. Into this program, Rachel, you and I are going
to stay in touch. You're my new best friend, and we're going to talk about social Security from time to time because it's really important, and it's really important as we get to the election season what they're going to finally have the nerve to do or perhaps not do, and just keep kicking the can down the road. Thank you for all the work you do, and thank you for your time this morning. My pleasure. Thanks Preston, Thank you,
Rachel Grezler with us with the Heritage Foundation. You got some fact and fiction taking care of right there. You got some bitter truths and realities, and I'm telling you you better pay attention to this and demand that Congress do something. Every vote of yours needs to be connected to this as well. What are you willing to do to solve the problem. It has to change. Twenty seven minutes past the hour, It's the Morning Show with Preston Scott.
Well, we're supposed to have a Lieutenant governor on the program, but it's not happening, so we'll move on. Big stories in the press box, brought to you by Restore Carpet Care and Tile. Let me back up for a second. What'd you think of the social security problem? Huh my, my, oh, my, little truth thrown into the world of social
security, and it's a disaster. It is an epic disaster. And I hope that you gleaned enough information to put a little bit of a fire in your belly and to talk about social security with your elected members of Congress. You cannot accept lip service. You need to demand that Congress acts to fulfill the promises made to retired adults now those nearing retirement, and then to move away from social Security for everybody else. I hope that segment was useful to
you. All Right, she has called in and so we are pleased to have with us the Lieutenant Governor of the Sunshine State, Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nunez, And how are you doing well, Preston, how are you? I'm doing terrific. You've been busy. Yeah, a little bit. Tell me about this work with the strike force combating the effects of the open border. We're about to get hit with another wave of Asian refugees obviously a little bit
of a different scenario than the open border. But first tell me what you've learned firsthand. Sure, well, as you recall, the governor put together this strike team, Operation Safe Highways. It's a multi law enforcement agency strike force that they patrol the areas of the state, the roadways which are obviously well traversed, and so I was able to join them and see firsthand the
work that they do and how they go about doing it. And I'll tell you it was really eye opening to be able to see them go about their business, their interdiction operations, which are focused on cracking down on human trafficking, human smuggling, illegal immigration, drug trafficking, all of that, and the amount of until that they've been able to obtain in the amount of not only drugs and arms and things like that, but they're often very frustrated because
when they encounter someone that they suspect is here illegally, and you know, they're really adept at kind of parsing through some of the stories and the lines that these folks give them, and so really they have a tremendous amount of expertise, and then what do they need to do. They need to call Customs and Border Patrol and have them come on site. And so oftentimes, and this is not a knock on the CBP agents, but oftentimes they just
they take forever. And so you can only detain these folks for so long if they're not engaged in some sort of the legal activity. And so they've expressed frustration in terms of how the lack of response at times from CBP, and I don't know if that's purposeful. You know, obviously the Biden administration wants them to turn a blind eye. They want them to be complicit in this whole legal immigration crisis that we're dealing with. So it really is insightful.
And I have a tremendous amount of respect for our law enforcement agents that are involved in this operation. And that's why the governor has always been very supportive of our men and women in blue, and he'll continue to provide them with the resources that they need. But you mentioned Haiti, and of course that's something that we're concerned about. I know the Governor is going to probably talk about this a little bit later this week, so stay tuned on that.
But in anticipation of what we had been doing previously, you know, prior to this latest issue in Haiti, the Governor had also instructed highway patrol and others to engage in a continuous patrolling of the area by air and by sea, and so working with the Coast Guard, which they were very appreciative
because they were also overwhelmed. You know. The governor continues to have law enforcement at all points of entry, and then he's also deployed National guardsmen, our newly minted State guardsmen, as well as highway patrol to the Texas border. So we are trying to cover all fronts, but it's just never enough. And unfortunately, we have a federal government that is, like I said, complice and trying to encourage as opposed to remove and eliminate the amount of
influx of illegal immigration. Lieutenant Governor stand by, We're going to take a quick break, come back talk a few more minutes. Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nuniez joins us this morning on the Morning show talk a little bit more about illegal immigration. You're also going to talk a little bit about the homeless issue plaguing the state, retail theft. You know, what's happening in other states, it will find its way here. Of course, Florida is a little different
than some of those other states, though we'll get to that next. The Morning Show with Preston Scott on News Radio one hundred point seven doubled. You have la talking about illegal immigration it's impact inside Florida with Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nuniez. Lieutenant Governor, are we aware yet? Do we have like a pie chart tolling us where the bulk of the illegals in our state are coming from? Are they coming from the southern border, Are they coming in off boats
from Cuba and wherever? Where are they coming from? Well, what I would say is that the vast majority of the illegal immigrants are coming through the border. That is, you know, that's been well documented, including the amount of as you mentioned, Cubans and even Haitians that are finding it easier to come through the border than to cross the Florida streets. We've also been
able to see how South Florida in particular has been impacted. If you look across the country all of the different immigration courts throughout the United States, the number one docket in terms of immigration removal proceedings is the Miami docket. It has ten percent of the nationwide cases that are currently in process for removal proceedings. So if that doesn't tell you that we are severely impacted by the border
crime, I don't know what does. So you know, we continue to focus on issues that we can to keep Floridian safe and many of the things that we talked about in the previous segment about all the efforts that the governor has undertaken to deal with this crisis. In addition to we've also the governor and paneled a statewide grand jury on the impact of human smuggling and what they've
been able to uncover. They release these interim reports called presentments. I would encourage you to read the last couple of ones that they've released, because these are individuals from all walks of life. This is not a partisan thing. These are people from all different persuasions all different you know, professions, and the amount of information that they've provided under the grand you know, the ability to subpoena grand jury. I mean, it is shocking. It should shake
you to your core. And it really is just an indictment on the on the Biden administration. Just a quick overlap because we've only got a couple of minutes left with you. When you talk about the problem with homelessness and the encampments and retail theft, did the legislative session tackle any of that? It sure did. We were really focused as session on law and order, and in addition to some of the things that we've already talked about, you mentioned
the homeless encampment issue. Governor was able to work with the legislature to make sure that we combat homelessness and keep our Florida streets clean, and by doing so, we were insistent on prohibiting camping on city streets, on sidewalks, on parks. What you see across the country in areas like San Francisco where there's just a homeless camp anywhere you turn on, you know, in public
parks. Our kids are you know, obviously frequenting these parks. So Governor wanted to make sure we keep our areas clean, and in addition, not just keep our ears clean, but also make sure that these individuals are going to state licensed, State licensed homeless shelters require these occupants to stop their drug use if they're using, to be able to get mental health treatment if they needed, and also to utilize workforce services so that they can perhaps transition from
homelessness to gainful employment. When you look at you compare, you know, I hate to compare California to Florida because there's no comparison. But in the last year of California homelessness rate went up fifteen percent and rather from twenty nineteen to twenty twenty two, and when you see Florida, our homelessness rate went down eleven percent. And even though we're the third most populous state in the country, even though obviously so many people want to live in Florida, Florida
has zero cities in the highest the top ten cities for homeless population. None of those cities are in Florida. Of course, they are where you think they would be, primarily in California, mainly in the West coast, with
New York City being the exception. On the East Coast in closing is there an awareness and then a corresponding effort to expanding mental health facilities because I know that there was a contraction of mental health hospitals available, and certainly if you triage the homeless problem problem, there's a percentage that need mental health services. Where are we with that? Yeah, Actually, some great work that was
done this year one of the Senate Presidents priorities. It's called the Live Healthy Act, which I'm sure the governor will be signing in the next week or
two, so you'll hear more on that at that point. But I will say they created a focus on mental health teaching hospitals, so not only providing additional funding for mental health services across the continuum, but making sure that we are providing opportunities for people that want to get into the mental health space to be able to not only teach those that are going to be providing the services, but make sure we're elevating the quality of the care and that it's best
practice and it's informed. And then obviously it's creating a scenario where by Florida will lead the country in terms of not only funding because it's not just enough to throw money at a problem, right, you need to do it in a way that's strategic and that's actually going to deliver results. And so increased funding for mental health, increased funding for homeless shelters, and create a pathway for a higher level of care for mental health hospital. Awesome, Jeanette,
thanks for the time this morning. I appreciate it. You're welcome anytime. Thank you. Take care all right, Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nunez with us this morning. Look at us just rolling out the guests here on the Morning Show with Preston Scott. Got to give a tip of the cap to Robbie listening out there in Kentucky. You, sir, we say a proud salute.
Makes me want to break out into blue Moon of Kentucky. Come on, listening to Rachel Gressler inspired to write us Senator rand Paul about the social security problem catastrophe. But you're preaching to the choir there. But just keep encouraging him because he's he's on board with us. There's some realists out there. Toppy Tubberville is one of them. They get it privately, they all get it. They all know Democrats won't talk about it out loud. They just
they will not say it out loud. It's gone. It's like if you looked inside the account, the Social Security account where everybody's money goes every paycheck. Uh oh, he's getting props. This is what it would sound like. Hello, Hello, Hello, Hello, hello, hello anybody there? Hello? Where is my money? Where's my money? I want my money? Where's my socials? Like cardy? I paid it to it? Where's why? Hello? Loo By Then that's the reality. Okay, with a
little laugh, very little, but still that's the reality. It's gone. Anyway, quick reminder before we dismiss the what is this high school? Yes, uh elevated, a very advanced high school, but only when you're talking. When I'm talking, it's it's elementary school. Anyway, Say hey, hey, if you got the rs VP request for the orphan shade thing, send it in deadlines Monday. We got we gotta know, all right,
So they go. Brought to you by Baron No Heating and Air. It's the Morning Show on w f l A once again, much like yesterday's program. We we we stuffed. We were like we were like the double stuffed Oreo, the Mega stuffed Oria, just stuffed with filling the difference though. Is the oreo filling tastes better the stuff we we Yeah, not so much, but we did cover a lot of ground. Why would the Biden administration be trying to protect how they're going to turn out the vote? They're not
releasing the information to the public. Freedom of information requests are being denied. Their get out the vote plan is top secret. Excuse me? I think it says everything we need to know. Of course it does, but I asked the rhetorical question. Yeah, for the sheer exercise of it, all to flex our brain mustle. Mike Johnson said it out loud, this is what you're doing. That's it, folks, open border, it's all about
voters, illegal voters. Did a Florida Man Factor fiction segment. Tomorrow, We've got Steve Stewart, David Hart's Keys to Entrepreneurship, m look at us Hi Brow road trip idea thanks to Rachel Gresler, talked about social security, The Lieutenant Governor of the Sunshine State joined us, and most importantly, thanks to you, all of you, because you make this so much fun. Talk to you tomorrow.