For decades, objectivity has been cited as journalism's gold standard, promising that journalists would stick “to the facts" and deliver both sides of the story, excluding their personal views. Those in support say it builds trust and gives newsreaders the information they need to form their own opinions. Those against say it suppresses certain valuable viewpoints and that some issues don’t merit the "both sides" treatment. Now, we debate: "Is Objectivity Essential in Journalism?”
Arguing Yes: Bret Stephens, Opinion Columnist at The New York Times
Arguing No: Leonard Downie, Jr, Former Executive Editor of The Washington Post
Nayeema Raza, Journalist and executive producer and co-host of Vox Media’s "On with Kara Swisher" podcast, is the guest moderator.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Is Objectivity Essential to Journalism? | Open to Debate podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast
