Welcome to Noble Blood, a production of iHeartRadio and Grim and Mild from Aaron Manky. Listener discretion advised. One brief note before we begin. This episode contains some very sexual scenes. October thirty, first, fifteen oh one, the sun was setting over Vatican City and most people were preparing to celebrate All Saints Eve, which usually involved feasting and attending church services in honor of beloved Catholic Saints. They didn't practice
Halloween as we know it today. Sadly, there was probably no one dressing up as a sexy bishop or sexy sacrament, but that didn't mean everything was quiet and chaste. Deep inside Vatican City, an epic party was about to begin in the Pope's private residence. The host was Cesaret Borgia, notorious, son of Pope Alexander the sixth. The guest list included the Pope himself, as well as Chesare's sister, the equally
notorious Lucretia Borgia. The party, known today as the Banquet of Chestnuts, for reasons that will soon become clear, has been gossiped about and debated for centuries. It has been depicted in pop culture with an entire episode of Showtime's series The Borges dedicated to it. The party began fairly normally, with a fine banquet, as you might be imagining from the name. It wasn't until after the meal that things got interesting. Fifty of Rome's finest cortesans were in attendance,
and after the meal they were ordered to disrobe. Servants moved the lit candelabras to the floor, where chestnuts were scattered about. The courtesans were then ordered to crawl around and pick them up. As one might imagine, these provocative actions quickly led to mass copulation, a holy orgy of sorts, blessed by the presence of the Pope, who sat with his illicit children and watched as the whole affair unfolded.
Sounds juicy, right, a perfect little nugget of gossip that lasted hundreds of years and helped define the Borges as sinful, lustful, and salacious. The banquet of chestnuts is a fascinating bit of history, but there is one big question we have to ask, is it history at all? Did the banquet of chestnuts actually happen? I'm Danish sports and this is noble blood. Ah. The Borges, the family that of Renaissance
era Italians loved to hate. If you listened to our episode about Lucretia Borgia, you'll remember that in all likelihood, the Borgies were probably more tame in real life than their reputations made them out to be, or at the very least Lucretia was. But there's no denying that they were hugely powerful figures, making bold moves with little regard for the fallout. Pope Alexander the sixth born Rodrigo Borgia
had many illegitimate children. This was not uncommon for a pope at the time, even though they of course were supposed to be celibate. But Alexander the sixth did make waves by actually claiming the four that he had with his favorite mistress. Two of the children from that relationship were Chesaret and Lucretia Borgia, who quickly gained reputations of
their own as political movers and shakers. Chesaat was known as a ruthless climber whose actions were the model for Machiavelli's The Prince, The how To or Tongue in Cheeks attire about acquiring power and influence. As a beautiful woman, Lucretia was a powerful political tool. Her marriages were orchestrated by her brother and father as a way to secure alliances and maintain control. At the time of the banquet, arrangements were being made for her third and final marriage
to Alfonso Ladeste, Duke of Ferrara. The Borges were infamous for their scheming and outright villainy, with accusationtions of every sin under the sun being thrown at the three main Borges. However, one had to assume that rumors aside, these guys would know how to throw one hell of a party, and
the Banquet of Chestnuts was one for the ages. The only reason we even know about this banquet today is thanks to the work of one dedicated man, someone with an eye for detail and a nose for a juicy story. Think of Truman, Capodi, Gossip Girl, Lady Whistledown. Johann Bouchard walked so that they could run. The most detailed account of the Banquet of Chestnuts comes from the diary of
Johann Burchard. Burchard was an Alsatian born jack of all white collar trades who worked both as a practicing lawyer and an ordained priest, among other things. He left home also leaving behind some theft and trafficking accusations, and moved to Rome in the late fifteenth century. There he began working his way up through the ranks of the Catholic Church, ultimately serving as Master of Ceremonies for five different popes. Alexander the sixth fell directly in the middle of the
line of popes that Burchard served. The Master of Ceremonies was an essential part of the Renaissance era Catholic Church, overseeing the accuracy and precision of the sacred rituals that were to be performed by the pope. The Master of Ceremonies served as a liturgical watchdog, keeping a close eye on the style and structure of religious ceremonies, as well as advising on etiquette and protocol for all sorts of church related matters, this one specifically also to who are
great Benefit was a devoted journal keeper. Burchard's collected diaries, also known as the Liber Notarum, serve as both an official record of the daily machinations of the Church and a fascinating look at a particularly wild and decadent period in Italian history. Here is what Burchard had to say
about this particular night in question. Quote on the evening of the last day of October fifteen oh one, Cesare Borgia arranged a banquet in his chambers in the Vatican with fifty honest prostitutes called courtesans, who danced after dinner with the attendants and others who were present, at first in their garments, then naked end quote. The sex workers are the only group Burchard mentioned with any specificity at all, calling the other guests, attendants and others who were present.
This is presumably to protect the anonymity of those who were involved. No doubt Borgia family, friends, and associates. Whoever the other attendees were, we can assume they were both powerful and discreet, or at the very least they didn't keep journals that made it into the historical record. The title of honest courtesans wasn't Burchard's way of passing judgment
on the workers. I'd argue that, with multiple confessions under his own belt, he was in no position to weigh in on the virtue of others, but rather, honest courtesans was actually a class distinction, a subset of sex workers who specifically served the nobility. They were often quite learned, with social graces and artistic, musical, or literary talents befitting the upper echelons of society. These honest courtesans could also
be unbelievably expensive, but their rates were gladly paid. After all, many noblemen needed the illusion of women of their own class and rank who would indulge their desires and find them endlessly fascinating. We'll talk more about the sex workers in the later part of this episode, but for now, let's press on. When we left them in the diary, the fifty sex workers were in the process of shedding their clothes and dancing with the other guests, who were
presumably still clothed. Burchard continues quote. After dinner, the candelabra with the burning candles were taken from the tables and placed on the floor, and chestnuts were strewn around, which the naked courtesans picked up, creeping on hands and knees between the chandeliers while the Pope, Cessaret and his sister Lucretia looked on. Let's pause here and unpack. Fans of HBO's succession might have already picked up on the similarities
to bore on the floor. A dysfunctional, power hungry family watching underlings humiliate themselves for a quick thrill. Abuse of power is truly timeless, but questions still abound even with this diary entry. Who threw the chestnuts? Were they already on the table and grabbed impulsively by Cessaray or one of his pals because someone decided the party needed to be kicked up a notch? Or was it all planned? Frustratingly, Burchard failed to think of future nosy readers, particularly the
more logistics oriented among us. He did, however, leave us with another last detail quote. Finally, prizes were announced for those who could perform the act most often with the courtesans, such as tunics of silk, shoes, barrels, and other things. Plenty of details here about the prizes themselves, not as much about the parts that were actually salacious. Who won? Are we correct to presume that only men could compete?
No doubt the revelers were up to all kinds of kinky business, but it feels safe to infer that the prizes were reserved for the men who copulated with the most women. Again, how much of this was planned ahead of time? It's unclear when the event picked up the name Banquet of Chestnuts, but it's easy to see how such a legendary gathering acquired an if you know, you know nickname. The party's effects were still on display for
days afterward. Florentine ambassador Francesco Peppy reported that Pope Alexander was a no show for mass for four days. Afterwards, rumors swirled of a nasty hangover. The ambassador chalked this up to the pontiff having gone out quote until the twelfth hour with the Duke, who had brought into the palace that night singers and courtesans, and all night they
spent in pleasure, dancing and laughter. While hangovers certainly do get worse with age, and the eldest Borgia was seventy years old at this time, a four day recovery still sounds a little excessive, but it certainly adds to the party's reputation. While Burchard is the only eye witness account of the party, the lascivious details fall right in line
with the existing public image of the Borges. Other documents support a party having taken place at the Apostolic Palace that night, but none of them have the Master of ceremonies eye for details or specifics. During this same time, the pope came across a pamphlet that laid bare every
scrap of public opinion about his infamous family. Written in the form of an anonymous letter to political exile Silvio Savelli, it functions as a sort of burn book, recording in sordid detail an exhaustive account of the borges alleged crimes. According to the pamphlet, the Pope was quote betrayer of the human race, Chessaret was a debaucherous murderer, and Lucretia was an incestuous monster who slept with pretty much every
member of her family. Clearly, the pamphlet was a combination of half truth's hyperbole and outright slander, but it was impactful enough that Burchard included passages in his diary. In her history book, Cesaret and Lucretia Borgia, brother and sister of history's most vilified family. Samantha Morris paints the male borges reactions to the pamphlet as consistent with their reputations. Quote Alexander, as was typical of him, found the whole
thing rather amusing. Cessaret, on the other hand, was less than impressed. Since he was a young man, he had not dealt well with slights on his pride, and during the December following the Savelli letter, he took action against a masked individual who was wandering the borgo uttering insults against the Pope's family end quote. C Cessarey had the man's right hand cut off, as well as his tongue, and displayed them in a local church as a cautionary tale.
A month later, Chesarey ordered the execution of a man for simply translating a libel against his family. The Pope's only response to his son's action was quote, the Duke is good natured, but he has not yet learned to bear insult end quote. Gossiping about the Borges was a dangerous game, especially with Chessaray around, but it was a game that few Italians seemed able to resist. It's easy to see why something like the banquet of chestnuts would
have easily taken hold with the public. It's the perfect kind of scandal, titillating, extravagant, strange, and best of all, it's about people in power. Much of the rumor mill surrounding the Borges concerned violent crimes, if not outright murder, So we can imagine that it must have been a little bit of a relief to be able to gossip about something as fun as a glorified orgy. But there has been much speculation about how true Richard's version of
events actually was. Centuries after Alexander the sixth death, Catholic monseigneur and historian Peter Derux wrote a five volume defense of the controversial pope, with the thesis that the Borgia patriarch had essentially been given the villain edit by history. It was Deroux's stance that the banquet couldn't possibly have happened as described, because Alexander would never have participated in
behavior that was so quote truly bestial. Dereux has since been condemned by other historians for his overly generous, if not delusional, view of the former pope. As dubious as Deru's argument may be, it does bear stating that it was widely known that Johann Burchard was not a fan of the Borges, But would that lead him to fully fabricate a story, or did he record it exact exactly as it occurred and let the family be judged by
their own actions. In his book The Borges, Power and Depravity in Renaissance Italy, Paul Strathorne remarks on the quote lurid detail of Burchard's account, as well as a report by a contemporary from Perugia named Francesco Materazzo. According to Moderazzo's account of the party, Pope Alexander had the lights extinguished, then quote the men and women left their clothes and had diversion. Still a salacious orgy, but not nearly as memorable as the banquet of chestnuts. Strathearne sums up what
many Italians probably thought at the time. Quote. Despite the possibility of exaggeration in these reports, some of the details have a compelling particularity. If nothing else, the Borges certainly seemed to be living up to their reputation. In other words, why be worried about the truth when the details are so fun and they could be true? And few people have had more fun with the story than William Manchester.
In his controversial book A World Lit Only by Fire, The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance, Manchester revels in the lurid details, often foregoing historical accuracy for the sake of a good story, he upgrades the courtesans from Burchard's account to quote the city's fifty most beautiful whores end quote, and adds some graphic details of his own. According to Manchester, quote, servants kept score of each man's orgasms for the Pope greatly admired virility, and measured a man's machismo by his
ejaculative capacity. After everyone was a exhausted, his holiness distributed prizes end quote. It's plausible, but we don't get those details in the original account. Hard to imagine what might have been going through the minds of the Borgia household servants as they stood by with pen and paper, jotting down hash marks each time a sexual act was finished
to completion. But in this version of the Borgia story, one would have to imagine that at this point in the servant's tenure, they probably would have just considered it part of the job. Manchester had a particular fascination with the female Borgia, even being generous enough to question the veracity of Lucretia's monstrous reputation. In his book, Manchester opined that quote the Lucretia Borgia, who has come down to us is an ad mixture of myth, fable and incontestable fact.
It is quite possible that she was to some degree a victim of misogynistic slander. The medieval Church saw woman as Ava Redeviva, the temptress responsible for Adam's fall, and the illegitimate daughter of a pope. May have been an irresistible target for gossip, particularly when she was physically attractive. End quote. If even a fairly salacious fabuloust can spot misogyny, then I think it's safe to say it was well
and present. On that note, let's look at Amy License's account from her book The sixteenth Century in one Hundred Women. In the chapter titled Unnamed Prostitute Banquet of Chestnuts, License imagines how the night would have gone from the perspective of two sex workers who were brought to the palace
for the evening. This version adhears fairly closely to Burchard's account as far as details go, with the added context of the role that sex work played in the culture, License writes, quote, prostitution was tolerated as a necessary evil in Renaissance Italy, following the various teachings of the Catholic Church Saint Augustine wrote that it prevented men from corrupting good women, and Thomas Aquinas believed that without it, the city would overflow with sin like a sewer, and men
would turn to the greater sin of sodomy. Prostitution was decriminalized but not respected. From that, one can imagine that the women were at the party not as guests, but as some combination of entertainment and party favors. Without their work, it would have been just another drunken dinner party. License concludes her chapter on the Banquet of Chestnuts by zooming out and looking at the lives of sixteenth century sex
workers in general. Quote, very few were able to serve members of the aristocracy with the commensurate rewards that could bring. The majority had little control over their market or the customers who approached them, exposing themselves not just to disease, but potentially to degradation and violence at the hands of the wrong man. The oldest profession in the world had its risks, and its surroundings were rarely as glamorous as
the Vatican Palace. Sex might have sold as it always has, but it paid very little, and the costs to prostitutes were often high end quote for a family like the Borges, the banquet of chestnuts, whether true or embellished, was a drop in the bucket, one more shiny bit of lore to add to an already opressive collection for the courtesan's tasks with providing the evening's entertainment. We can only imagine
the long term effects. What would happen if any of them became pregnant, or injured or contracted an STI Generally, honest courtesans received better treatment than their lower class counterparts. Some even enjoyed the same perks afforded to dedicated mistresses. But there was certainly no code of conduct that their patrons were forced to adhere to, so we can safely assume that there was uncertainty and precariousness even at the
highest levels of the profession. It's hard to imagine any member of the Borgia household giving even a glancing thought to the long term welfare of the sex workers they brought in once the party was over. The details of the banquet of chestnuts might have been exaggerated, or maybe it did happen and exactly as the Master of ceremony
wrote down. Either way, I think it's worth looking past the salaciousness of the gossip and remembering that if it did happen, there were fifty real life women who had no choice but to become accessories to the Borges legend. That's the story of the Banquet of chestnuts. But keep listening after a brief sponsor break to hear another rumor of impropriety at the papal palace. Christopher Hibbert gives us an additional anecdote that serves as the perfect epilogue to
our story. In his book The Borges and their Enemies, Hibbert details an event that happened just a few days after the banquet, when a different kind of entertainment was brought into the palace. Thanks to our faithful diar s Johann Burchard. There is an account in which a farmer delivering wood to the market was redirected by palace guards. The guards unsaddled the farmer's mares and led them to
the courtyard inside the palace gates. According to Hibbert quote, four stallions were then freed from their reins and harnesses and let out of the palace stables. They immediately ran to the mares, over whom they proceeded to fight furiously and noisily amongst themselves, biting and kicking in their efforts to mount them, and seriously wounding them with their hoofs. The Pope and Lucretia, laughing with evident satisfaction, watched all that was happening from a window above the palace gate.
End quote. Again, we must take Burchard's counts with a grain of salt, but it's hard not to notice this story contains certain echoes of the banquet of chestnuts. Father and daughter taking in the spectacle, delighting in sexual exploits, this time with the addition of physical violence. Even if the family members never actually engaged in sexual acts with each other, their apparent comfort with being together in the presence of them is enough to raise eyebrows a little bit.
At best, it's strange. At worst, the Borges are never beating those incest allegations. Noble Blood is a production of iHeartRadio and Grimm and Mild from Aaron Mankey. Noble Blood is hosted by me Danish Forts, with additional writing and researching by Hannah Johnston, Hannah Zwick, Courtney Sender, Julia Milani,
and Armand Cassam. The show is edited and produced by Noehmy Griffin and rima Il Kaali, with supervising producer Josh Thain and executive producers Aaron Mankey, Alex Williams, and Matt Frederick. Four more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.