The 500-Year Medici Mystery

go read it immediately. It will change your life. It's also a great movie, but the book is extraordinary. And next July, with an amazing program called Common Ground, I will be leading they called a pilgrimage, but what that basically means is we all stay together in a beautiful old mansion in the Cotswaltz. We meet every morning.

seems like it might be up your alley. It was a crisp morning in February fifteen forty eight when a pale nobleman in his early thirties stepped out of a church in Venice. Lorenzino de Medici was originally from Florence, a member of the vastly powerful Medici family, but he wasn't a stranger to the Venetian streets. He'd been living in exile in Venice for years because back in Florence,

Lorenzino was a wanted murderer. As he strolled through the bustle of the city with his uncle, Lorenzino repeatedly glanced over his shoulder and his eyes flicked to the sudden movements of passing merchants and paupers. Despite his uncle's assurances that they were safe out in public, Lorenzino's habit was hard to break. He was always wondering if retribution was coming for the weighty crime he had committed eleven years earlier. After all, his infamous murder had rattled the highest houses

of European power. Lorenzino had personally murdered his own cousin, the first Duke of Florence, Alessandro de Medici. Lorenzino had claimed that he had rid the realm of a tyrant. But regardless of his possible intentions, this podcast has taught us anything, it's that you can't avoid the consequences of such a brazen act forever, and fate usually finds a

way of catching up with you. Sure enough, on the morning of February twenty sixth, fifteen forty eight, Lorenzino's punishment finally found him more than a decade after his crime. He and his uncle were almost at the Santoma Bridge, mere minutes from Lorenzino's home, when two assassins ambushed them. Lorenzino was instantly incapacitated by a fierce blow to the head, and then he was stabbed several more times to ensure his imminent death. Lorenzino's uncle and the attackers fled as

Lorenzino lay bruised and bloodied. He didn't take his final breath for another half an hour, but he couldn't speak, not even as his own mother rushed out to his side. It's likely that the blunt force of his mortal injuries impeded much clarity of thought or reflection, but if any any synapses were still firing, they certainly would have had no shortage of questions regarding how exactly the assassination had been carried out and why this brutal payback took so

long to arrive. Lorenzino would never know who had actually been behind his own violent assassination, and for centuries neither did anyone else. But today the question of who was behind Lorenzino's murder is a mystery no more. It took almost half a millennium, but that cold case was finally cracked.

I'm Dana Schwartz, and this is noble blood. The ripple effects of this tale of murder and betrayal are immensely complicated and far reaching, but the simplest place to start is with one key relationship that between our murderer turned murder victim, Lorenzino de Medici and the cousin he had killed,

Duke Alessandro de Medici. And our story of their relationship begins with a cheeky night out on the evening of January sixth, fifteen thirty seven, twenty three year old Lorenzino came to his powerful twenty six year old cousin with an enticing pitch, a secret knight of pleasure with a beautiful woman. If Alessandro could leave his royal escort, sneak out of his apartment in the Palazzo Medici and slip into Lorenzino's bedchamber, Lorenzino would bring the alluring Katerina Solderini

to join him. The careful secrecy was necessary to limit gossip, especially since Katerina was married and also incidentally Lorenzino's aunt. As instructed, Alessandro went out that evening with friends, and then he excused himself. Upon returning to Piazza de San Marco. Slowly, the duke approached the wing of the Medici complex where

Lorenzino resided. Lorenzino de Medici had little in common with his namesake, the earlier Medician patriarch Lorenzo the Magnificent, or with Lorenzino's many other ancestors of the same name who had brought wealth and distinction to the family. Know for as long as Alessandro had known his short, pallid and introverted relative, Lorenzino or Little Lorenzo was a fitting nickname.

Since childhood, Lorenzino was known more for his studious nature than any commanding bearing, and was far likelier to be found immersed in a book, book or theater production, then trying to climb the ranks of power. Back at Lorenzino's palace, Alessandro slipped inside with quiet ease. Instead of wearing the chainmail lined doublet he typically favored as protection against any possible sneak attacks, He was decked out that night in

a Neapolitan silk cloak. Judging by those nocturnal fashion choices alone, his desire for comfort and style clearly outweighed any cautious instincts he might have had, and understandably so, this had all the markings of another one of his trusted cousins delightfully mischievous schemes. Through their early adult years, Lorenzino and

Alessandro had formed a bond that sparked numerous escapades. Lorenzino had not only become a close adviser to his cousin on political matters, he also facilit hated Alessandro's womanizing so frequently that a few at court snidely referred to him as the Duke's hymp long. A passionate writer, Lorenzino even penned a whole irreverent comedy play for Alessandro's marriage to

a young bride from the prominent Habsburg family. So when Alessandro entered Lorenzino's bedroom that night, it's unlikely he was in a suspicious frame of mind at all. Lorenzino suggested that his cousin stow his weapons under the bed to set the right romantic tone. Alessandro acquiesced. Lorenzino had also told him to make himself comfortable while he went to fetch the beautiful cacherina. As Alessandro waited on his cousin's bed, it's possible that he mulled over all of the red

flags cropping up in his path. After all, his cousin occasionally seemed to show a slightly darker side. The serious, melancholy demeanor Lorenzino exhibited as a boy unnerved some people, and there was the bizarre story about how Lorenzino had decapitated the heads of several ancient sculptures and statues in Rome. The defilement was egregious enough to get Lorenzino expelled from the city by the Pope even though the pope was

a close Medici relative. On the other hand, Lorenzino's childhood seriousness and strangeness was not necessarily surprising, given that he had lost his father at a young age, and his statue shenanigans could have easily been brushed off as an ill advised prank rather than the sign of some unhinged leaning. But it's probably unlikely that Alessandro was seriously worried about

any risk while waiting on Lorenzino and Katerina. Alessandro actually lay down and took a nap, but as you might have guessed, Lorenzino had more than a little tryst planned for his cousin. Upon leaving Alessandro in his bedchamber, Lorenzino did not seek out Katerina. He instead went to his

loyal servant, Piero de Joannabate, nicknamed scorn Concolo. Lorenzino had already gotten the thuggish man to agree to help enact justice against an unnamed enemy that he would lock in his bedchamber while ushering scorn Concolo back, though, Lorenzino had to ensure that his accomplice was prepared to follow through on his promise, regardless of the target's identity. In other words, he told him, yes, they were going long after the Duke of Florence, and as Lorenzino saw it, it was

a deed that needed to be done. Like Lorenzino, Alessandro's early years were inauspicious, especially by Medicis standards. Alessandro was actually born a bastard, son of a Medici ruler and an enslaved woman. Alessandro also lost his father at a young age, a death that, after years of strife and maneuvering within the family, remarkably led Alessandro to be named

the first Duke of Florence. Especially following Alessandro's ascension and Larenzino's return to Florence from Rome, the cousins outwardly appeared to be inseparable. Alessandro was said to have greatly loved his cousin, favoring Lorenzino's advice at court and benefiting from

Lorenzino's hearty enabling of his philander. But as Lorenzino apparently felt at his core and would continue to argue for years to come, Alissandro was a true monster, a man obsessed with torturing and killing men for real or perceived slights, A tyrant, how could he be allowed to continue to live and rule Outside Lorenzino's bedchamber, scorn Concolo assured Lorenzino that he would not spare their wicked foe, whether he

was the Duke or even Jesus himself. So Lorenzino called out to check whether his cousin was asleep, and then he and scorn Concolo entered through a different door. The two attacked Alessandro, who jolted awake and fought desperately. Alessandro even bit down on Lorenzo's hand in an attempt to free himself. Finally, after a frenzied struggle, Alessandro fell still, scorn Concolo's dagger planted in his throat. Lorenzino and scorn

Concolo immediately fled on horseback. As Lorenzino eventually arrived in Venice, news of the Duke's sensational death was spreading like wildfire. Word traveled through urgent missives, rumors, and through Lorenzino's own lips. You heard that right. Rather than refute his guilt, Lorenzino confessed his crime to anyone and everyone who would listen, as any fan of TV murder Mysteries or Agatha Christie novels knows catching a killer is usually a tricky task

that takes cunning and exhaustive investigation. Only when faced with irrefutable evidence and no foreseeable escape do murderers finally give up and confess. Lorenzino would have made for an incredibly unsatisfying novel. Not only did he openly admit he killed Duke Alessandro, he wrote a whole, flowery, eloquent explanation of it,

called the Apology. Obviously, the Apology is about as subjective of a statement as you'll find, but in many ways, that's what makes it so fascinating, because it serves as a window into Lorenzino's mind and motivations. Why did Lorenzino murder Alessandro, especially when he had no plan in place to usurp power himself or to aid another noble in seizing it. His apology has been hailed by many as a sparkling piece of rhetoric, but even his own arguments

got fairly tangled. First, Lorenzino emphasized his political reasons for murdering Alessandro. Per the ancient the Roman ideals of republicanism that Lorenzino studied and admired, he sought as his duty to eliminate a tyrannical oppressor. As I touched on earlier, he claimed that Alessandro was a fiend, a sadistic villain whose cruel behavior made him worse than Caligula and Nero combined.

The way in which Lorenzino asserted his murderous responsibility essentially implied that he thought of himself as the brutus of his day. Republican and Florentine exiles living abroad soon echoed that sentiment, comparing Alessandro's rule to Caesar's dictatorship and hailing Lorenzino as their Tuscan brutus. In his apology, Lorenzino also wades into a more philosophical branch of reasoning for killing his cousin. Lorenzino debated the entire legitimacy of power wielded

by a hereditary ruler. Thus, in spite of the fact that returning power to the people would require a brutal act, in Lorenzino's mind, it was worth it. Niccolomachiavelli had written his famous treatise The Prince only twenty years earlier, and, in an ironic turn of history, actually dedicated it to Alessandro's father, so again, being an avid reader, Lorenzino was quite steeped in the idea that the end can justify the means. Finally, the apology also reveals several personal reasons

Lorenzino wanted to kill his cousin. His writing conveys a lingering sense of self righteousness about being a legitimate Medici's son and not a bastard. The ways in which Lorenzino calls attention to Alessandro's quote innate cruelty and savagery, and his heritage as the son of a Moorish in see

slaved mother are worthy of note. A great deal of scholarship has been written on the complexities of pre modern ideas about race and the way they differ from our own, but in general, it's absolutely worth questioning whether Lorenzino's biases against his cousin's Moorish ancestry could have factored into both his slang of his cousin and his subsequent appeal for understanding from what he assumed to be a similarly biased

audience zooming out to view Lorenzino's crime and written apology together, it's possible to trace an even more self absorbed arc. As some historians have conjectured it's possible Lorenzino's driving motive was simple. He wanted to be noticed. After all, he was a Medici, but a fairly overlooked one, considering the highly pre mediti nature of both the murder and confession, the risks involved in all the new paths to fame

that the printing press had ushered in. Was this assassination to some degree fueled by a desire to trade relative obscurity for celebrity, to shed recollections of quote little Lorenzo's meek childhood demeanor, of his embarrassing expulsion from Rome, of his literally belittling moniker in order to fully enter the limelight. Whatever his cocktail of motives, Lorenzino certainly gave the world a taste of, as some might call it today, his

quote main character energy. He became famous and infamous almost overnight. He gained tremendous support, especially in Venice, which was home to many members of the Florentine Republic that had previously failed against Medici's might. Exiles scattered across Europe celebrated Duke Alessandro's death. Support and money poured in from France and Spain. Commemorative medals were even produced depicting Lorenzino in Roman robes, but Lorenzino had obviously also made himself a marked man.

The rest of the Medici family and its allies vehemently decried his deplorable act and vowed to retaliate. Cosimo the First de Medici was named the next Duke of Florence, and he offered a handsome reward to anyone who would avenge the murder of his predecessor, Alessandro. And yet for eleven years no one followed through. Plots were hatched, attempts were made, but for the most part, the new Duke

dragged his feet getting revenge. Despite promising swift action against Alessandro's murderer and being repeatedly urged to follow through by many in his political orbit, Cosimo the First basically tried to ignore the issue. As Cosimo continued to delay his plans of revenge, many contemporaries describe Lorenzino as a wretched soul wrecked by anguish and guilt, but in fact, some sources show that not only did he stay hopeful that one day exiles would be able to return to Florence.

Over the years, he went on multiple diplomatic missions to Mirandola, France and Constantinople to stoke support for his personal cause, and so eleven years after he killed his cousin on that chilly morning in Venice in fifteen forty eight, as Lorenzino left church with his uncle, It's not it's unthinkable that some part of him dared hope that he might never actually have to pay the ultimate price for killing Alessandro. His ambushing attackers, however, had other plans. They beat him,

stabbed him, and closed the homicidal loop. Those men's identities were clear right away. Francesco Boboni and Bebeo de Volterra soon went to collect their reward from Duke Cosimo, but they were contracted killers, hired by somebody with more clout, so who actually had ordered the hit. It wasn't until twenty fifteen, a full four hundred and sixty seven years

after the fact, that definitive proof emerged. If this murder mystery were a movie or a novel, a rmand detective might have the benefit of interrogating prime suspects in a nice contained location, say a cozy train or charming English manor house. In reality, all of the main players here were spread across Europe and then eventually all dead and gone. But the detective at the core of this century spanning case, the historian Stefano de Lallio, was delightfully dedicated in his investigation.

So let's don our sleuthing hats and puff thoughtfully on our pipes and follow along with him in examining the likely individuals and possible theories behind who was behind Lorenzina's execution. The obvious first suspect was Costimo, the first di Medici, the replacement Duke of Florence, who would have wanted to avenge a death in the family and protect Medici power. He offered the rear had multiple agents in Venice trying to tie up loose ends, met with Lorenzino's two attackers beforehand,

and then gave them their promised reward afterward. Case closed right. Many scholars accepted that narrative for centuries, but dal Aglio found letters that proved Cosimo's agents were actually bear with me in Venice to kill a different influential Florentine exile, and Cosimo was not even the first noble to be alerted once Lorenzino's murder was accomplished. John Francisco Ltini was another likely culprit. Lotini was Duke Cosimo's secretary and a

guy with a history of violence. Several historians writing after the event posited that Cosimo sent him to Venice, where he then predominantly organized Laura or Enzeno's assassination, but there's no direct evidence to support that theory, and in fact, it was actually later discovered that nineteenth century historians who posited it had actually misunderstood key archival documents. It was also natural to wonder whether the assassins had simply acted

of their own accord. The reward was massive. On top of the huge sum of four thousand gold ducats, which would have been over one hundred times the annual salary of many laborers and soldiers at the time, these successful killers of Lorenzino would also be shielded from punishment and

even receive amnesty for any prior crimes. Still, even for such a bounty, this theory doesn't make a ton of sense, given the risks, the political clout of the main parties involved, and the fact that after so long, any killer seriously considering the job would want to go through the proper channels to clear it with Cosimo beforehand to make sure that they would still get paid. As the two killers did, I mean, there was no guarantee that the reward was

still standing eleven years later. Margaret of Parma, Alessandro's grieving widow, was another interesting suspect. The two had been married less than a year before Lorenzino killed Alessandro. She was only fourteen at the time and devastated to the point that she signed her letters sad Margaret, she placed her own

bounty on Lorenzino's head. Although her most potent means of instigating revenge wouldn't be from her own direct influence, it would be from her ability to call on other power powerful figures including Charles the Fifth, the Habsburg King of Spain, the Archduke of Austria, and Holy Roman Emperor, a man who ruled a conglomeration of realms so large some referred to it as the empire on which the sun never sets.

Turns out, Charles had two big motives. First, Duke Alessandro had been under his direct political protection, and two, Duke Alessandro's wife, Margaret, was his daughter, so he was adamant that, for reasons personal and political, his son in law must be avenged. Our investigative historian del Alio had a hunch that Charles the fifth was the mastermind pulling the strings. But if so, why did he wait so long for one thing? Letters showed that Charless felt that revenge should

come from Florence. Cosimo should be the one to enact justice for a crime that was committed in his own state. Additionally, Charles the fifth was really, really busy. He was off at war with France and trying to staunch the spread of Protestantism in Germany. Back in Florence, Cosimo had his own reasons for procrastinating avenging his predecessor. On a basic level, he actually wouldn't even be duke if Alessandro hadn't died,

so he wasn't too terribly upset about it. And furthermore, he was more focused on consolidating power in Florence at the time, on quelling more exile uprisings, ardently supporting the arts, and actually being an unusually faithful husband. He had his own life to lead. Cosimo eventually proved to be an astute ruler who became the first Grand Duke of Ty and he would have a substantial influence on Florentine culture for years to come, even cementing a relatively successful working

relationship with Charles the Fifth. So ironically, if Lorenzino had indeed been attempting to limit Medici power in Florence by killing Duke Alessandro, it backfired. Nevertheless, as the years passed, Charles the Fifth grew restless on that lingering, loose end of Lorenzino. The timing of Lorenzino's murder ultimately coincided with a period when Charles the Fifth's other conflicts abated and he finally had time to focus on the Italian States.

His direct involvement makes sense, but historian del Alio needed clear proof in order to connect the dots. Luckily, Charles the Fifth left behind plenty of evidence. As de Laalio himself said of his search, the most logical place to look for a gun still smoking after five hundred years was Charles the Fifth's own archives, which he founded during

this period to preserve his papers. Sure Enough, surprisingly, explicit documents preserved there shed definitive light, specifically direct correspondent between Charles the Fifth and his Venetian ambassador, which revealed the emperor's adamant stance that Lorenzino's crime should never be forgiven. The men contemplated the possible methods, logistics, and personnel that

would be needed to finally kill Lorenzino. Then, at long last, on January eleventh, fifteen forty eight, a letter from Augsburg arrived in Venice. Charles the Fifth personally ordered Lorenzino de Medici's murder. Duke Cosimo had been generally informed of the plot, particularly so that he could guarantee the payment of his offered bounty, but when it came to bringing Lorenzino to justice, Charles the Fifth, Charles the Fifth's ambassador, and the two

hired killers took the primary initiative. Accordingly, Charles the Fifth was immediately notified of Lorenzino's death before any other ruler, so that he could give instructions on how to proceed. In hindsight, seeking out a repository of incredibly relevant and conveniently kept information seems almost laughably obvious. The evidence was

right there. But revisiting such a case took the fortitude to challenge long accepted wisdom, wisdom that seemed plausible enough, and to form the right theories to know where to look solving the mystery in this case also required that the executioner, our big boss, Charles the Fifth, preserved his correspondence, and why shouldn't he Why worry about anyone discovering a little more blood on his hands? If anything, his feelings

were probably the opposite. Though this was only a small chapter of his sizeable legacy, it's easy to imagine that on some level he wanted it known for posterity that if you come for a protected duke, a noble cousin, the son in law of the most powerful man in Europe, you don't walk free forever. If revenge is a dish best served cold, then the final helping Charles served to Lorenzino was truly ice. That's the story of Lorenzino de

Medici's turbulent life and murder. But stick around after a brief sponsor to hear about an additional intriguing wrinkle in Lorenzino's murderous legacy. After killing Lorenzino de Medici, one of the hired assassins actually distributed his own written account of

his violent act. Far from exhibiting the eloquence and erudite musings of Lorenzino's apology, Francesco Beiboni's cruder confession still completed, a fitting sort of eleven year call and response, and in its own way, this follow up statement amplified some of Lorenzino's own morbid rationale, or, as author translator Tim Parks put it, quote, the notion that saving oneself from the oblivion of anonymity is sufficient justification for any atrocity.

Noble Blood is a production of iHeart Radio and Grim and Mild from Aaron Mankey. Noble Blood is hosted by me Dana Schwartz, with additional writing and research by Hannah Johnston, Hannahswick, Courtney Sender, Amy Hit and Julia Milani. The show is edited and produced by Jesse Funk, with supervising producerrima Ill Kali and executive producers Aaron Manke, Trevor Young, and Matt Frederick.

For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.