The volume. Have you been hungry for some college football, Well we finally get a taste this weekend. Don't miss any of the action. Jump in at DraftKings Sportsbook. It's a small but mighty slate of games for Week zero, including a big matchup in Ireland. This is going to be Draftking's biggest college football season to date. Enjoy the ride now all the way through the expanded playoffs, plus all newbies getting into the college spirit. Here's something extra
special new Draft Kings customers. Bet five dollars to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets. Instantly score big with DraftKings all college football season long. Download the Draft Kings Sportsbook gap now and use code hoops. That's hops, that's code hoops for new customers to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets when you bet just five bucks only
on DraftKings. The Crown is yours. Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler In New York call eight seven seven eight hope and why or text hope and why to four to six, seven three six nine. In Connecticut, help us available for problem gambling. Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas twenty one plus. Age and eligibility varies by
jurisdiction void in Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see dkang dot co. Slash ft ball. All right, welcome to tonight. You're at the volume heavy Friday. Everybody ohe ball. If you guys have had a great week.
We are continuing our player rankings today with number thirteen and number twelve, and then as usual at the tail end of the show, I've got a mail bag full of a bunch of different counterpoints and arguments from you guys about the list that will kind of bounce back and forth in a mailbag format. You guys know the drill before we get started. Subscribed to the Hoops Tonight YouTube channels so you don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter at underscore JSNLTS. You guys don't
miss any show announcements. Don't forget about a podcast feed ore if you get your podcast under Hoops Tonight. Don't forget it's also helpfullly leave a rating and a review on that front. And the last, but not least, keep dropping mailbag questions in those YouTube comments. I want you guys to argue if you disagree with the ranking. If there's something that you have a basketball case for, lay it out and we will go over it in the mail bag at the tail end of these player rankings videos.
As we head into next week, all right, let's talk some basketball. So this is our last video before we enter into our Superstar tier, which is actually two tiers, but the top eleven players in the league I consider to be like the bonafide superstar tier. This is kind of like a gap tier, these last two guys before we get into that stretch. Both of these players are guys that I consider to be superstars when they are healthy, but they've had major availability issues and so it's kind
of a funky spot to put them. And I'm less concerned about the numbers here. It's more as a sign of respect because there are guys that are behind these two guys that are very likely to be more available and be more productive this year. However, if these guys are healthy, you can't write them off because they're so damn good, and so this is kind of like a weird tier here that's between the superstars and those lower level stars where I decided to put these two guys,
and we're starting with number thirteen, Kawhi Leonard. He's averaged just forty three games played in the regular season over
his last four seasons. He has either failed to appear entirely or failed to finish his team's playoff run in each of the last four seasons, and so that makes him a very difficult player to rank as a result, because the reality is, when he's healthy, he's a guy who contributes to winning at a top five level as a playoff player with the Clippers, not counting last year because last year he played hurt and so he played
two games he looked bad. I think he averaged like twelve points a game, So he probably just shouldn't even have played in those games, right, and that was why he ended up leaving the series. But if you take those two games out, as a playoff player with the Clippers, in twenty six games before last season, he averaged thirty points, eight rebounds, and five assists on sixty three percent true shooting and was an outstanding defender. That's not just superstar production.
That's like with the best guys in the league type of production. There was literally a moment this year. Just go back to March, so we're talking what's that five months ago? Five months ago, there was a stretch where the Clippers were dominating the league and Kawhi looked like the best player on the best team in the league.
From November seventeenth to March ninth, the Clippers went thirty eight and fourteen, and Kawhi averaged twenty five points on fifty four percent from the field forty three per sent from three on five attempts per game in ninety one. At the line, that's that's insane. He looked like the best player are the best team in the league. And so this is complicated because on one hand, they're everyone above him.
You're easily taking over him to start a franchise for the next season at least, because you just can count on those guys to be available, at least to a much greater extent than Kawhi. But at the same time, if two equal teams were facing off tomorrow in a playoff series and we knew Kawhi was healthy, you would you take him over Tatum? I would would you take him over Anthony Edwards? I would would you take him over Joe Lmbat? I would would you take them over
shake yild justs Alexander? I would even the guys at the top of the league, like Luca and Giannis or the perennial great you know, a playoff players like Lebron James and Steph Curry. I still think Kawhi can go
head to head with those guys. So like, it just makes this really complicated, and honestly, like when we're looking at this type of list, it just is it's almost a sign of respect because I can make this list and we can make fun of the Clippers all we want, and we can talk about how Kawhi hasn't been available in all of that. But if for whatever reason, we fast forward to May and he is out there, he's
gonna be one of the top guys. So that's why I thought this thirteen to twelve area made the most sense for these two particular guys, because it's like a gap tier. And obviously it's not an exact science, because for example, I'd rather have a guy like Jalen Brown on my team next year to lead my team, just because I know Jaylen Brown's gonna play seventy games and I know his body's gonna hold up for the playoff runt.
He's just a safer bet. But if Kawhi ran into Jalen Brown in a playoff series and they were both healthy, Kawhi's eating Jalen Brown's lunch in a seven gamer. So it's just a tough thing to quantify. And so that that's why I'm kind of using this gap tire so really quickly. Last year, Kwhi Leonard sixty eight games, played twenty three point seven points per game, fifty three percent from the field, forty two percent from three to eighty
nine percent from the line. That amounts to fifty nine percent an effective field goal percentage and sixty three percent in true shooting percentage. Jump shooting stats from Synergy one point zero nine points per jumper, one point two six points per catch and shoot jumper. He shot forty eight percent in field goal percentage on jump shots when he was unguarded. So like, if you left Kawi open, it was going in at least half the time, which is crazy.
One point zero. I shouldn't say at least half the time, but basically half the time. One point zero one points per pull up jumper. He shot forty five percent on them overall. The only reason he's not as efficient as some of the top guys as he takes a lot of long twos. He also got one point three points per face up jumper, which is excellent. He shot fifty nine percent on floaters, took about one per game, fifty percent on hooks, and seventy two percent at the rim.
All those numbers are insane. Play type data PERCENTERGY one point zero four points per pick and roll including passes. That's seventy fifth percentile, although he only ran three hundred and sixty seven of them obviously because James Harden was taking most of the pick and roll volume. He got one point twenty five points per ISO including passes on three hundred and sixty six reps. That puts him on
a high volume list. Kawhi Leonard was the best ISO player in the league last year by a massive margin. The second best player out of the twenty four players run at least two hundred and fifty ISOs including passes was DeMar derozen and Tomorrow is a full tenth, more than a full tenth of a point per possession below Kawhi, he was just by far the best in straight iso situations. He also got one point one to four points per
pose up that's seventy eight percentile. And this really is the crux of what makes Kawhi Leonard such an intriguing basketball player. When he's healthy, he's almost robotic with his efficiency. Every shot looks the same, it goes in damn near every single time. He's so damn strong that nobody can keep him from his spots. I talk about the every year when we do Kawhi and the player rankings, but like he's the case study for why going to the weight room is one of the most important things a
young basketball player can do. Obviously, a guy like Lebron is really strong, but he's also this like unbelievable supreme athlete. Kawhi Leonard is a good athlete, but he's not like a Lebron James level athlete. What makes him so impossible to guard is he's just so damn strong that when you're guarding him face up and he rips through to the right, you could put your hands on him if you want. He's just ripping through you. If you don't cleanly beat him to his spot and chest up his shoulder.
If he gets his shoulder into your shoulder, he's going through your shoulder. He's going through you to get to his spot. If you're fouling him, if you're hacking him, he's not as susceptible to that. If you hit him a little bit when he's rising up into a jumper, he's just gonna power through. If you try to foul him at the rim, he's gonna power through seventy two
percent at the rim. And like, we talk about this all the time, but like if you have the moves and you have the IQ to get to the s, but it's a really physical game and you don't have the strength, then it's borderline useless. Having that strength is a huge asset, and in my opinion, one of the big reasons why Kawhi Leonard translates his game so well to the postseason. As the physicality ramps up, he becomes one of the guys that is most durable. I shouldn't
say durable is the wrong word. He becomes the most resilient in terms of his ability to actually get to those spots durability definitely not the strong point for Kawilener and misspoke there, but that's what makes everything so interesting with him. I think his strength is a real differentiator, and he's covered for his weaknesses as a playmaker over the years enough that he's become really resilient to different coverages into different schemes, and that's why he's become such
a dominant playoff player. Here's the thing. Is Kawhi really a threat this year? No, because none unless the Clippers make some improvements. They lost Paul George for nothing, and so even beyond the health stuff, I don't think they have the firepower to make it out of that blood bath of a Western Conference. But when he's healthy, he's still one of the top tier superstars in this league and he should be respected as such, even if he
shouldn't necessarily be feared. And so that's why I have him where I have him on the list this year, even though there are some guys behind him on this list that theoretically are most likely to provide more value within this season, you have to quantify the what if he is healthy element, even though it's a little weird now that he's been unhealthy four years in a row.
So you have an upcoming fantasy football draft, well, then you need to check out the Fantasy Pros Draft Wizard. When you sink your fantasy football league with Draft Wizard, you'll get an instant report that shows you how the rest of your league drafts. You'll see who overdrafts rookies in early rounds, who's going to be the person to take that first QB off the board, and which manager is going to always reach for that hometown player every
single time. And then you can take those patterns directly into the draft simulator and make your mock draft feel like the real thing. When your real draft comes around, going to be ready, and the draft assistant will be there for you to give you live pick by pick insights and expert recommendations of who to draft and when to draft them. You can see all of this and more at fantasypros dot com. Slash Volume today.
Number twelve. Jimmy Butler last year sixty games played. He's averaged just fifty eight games played per season. Since coming to Miami, he averaged twenty one points per game, five rebounds, five assists, fifty percent from the field, forty one percent from three to eighty six percent from the line, so nearly a fifty to forty ninety season. That amounts to fifty four percent in effective field goal percentage, sixty three percent in true shooting. I'll be that. Albeit that was
actually down from his previous year. We're going to get to that in a little bit. Shooting stats. He had a really good jump shooting season. One point zero four points per shot, one point three seven points per catch and shoot jump shot. That's awesome. Not a good off the dribble season though, zero point eight to one off the dribble. Out of one hundred and five players to attempt at least one hundred and fifty pull up jump shots,
Jimmy Butler ranked ninety six on that list. Not a great You'll get your notices them going through these numbers. A lot of really good numbers for Jimmy and then a lot of really bad ones too. Forty three percent on floaters, that's average, fifty eight percent at the rim. That is not great. For not good, I should say for a player of his size and athleticism. He got zero point eighty nine points per pick and roll including passes.
That's in the thirty fifth percentile. That's not good. One point one three points per ISO, including passes that made or high volume list, and ranked third out of the twenty four players to run at least two hundred and fifties. So like, that's kind of what I mean by all the up and down one hundred ninety eight points one hundred ninety eight post ups. You guys can do the math on that one. That was in the forty sixth percentile,
So slightly below average to me. Jimmy Butler's basically like a lesser version of Kawhi that has been more available to his team. But there are a lot of similarities. Like Kawhi operates in ISO more than pick and roll. Jimmy Butler is a guy that I shouldn't say more, but he's a higher volume ISO guy compared to most guys in the league and a lower volume pick and roll guy compared to most guys in league. So is Jimmy Butler. Kawhi Leonard uses his size and strength against
smaller perimeter players as his primary advantage. So does Jimmy Butler. Both of them are capable of being dominant defensive players. The main differences are, obviously, their personalities are very different. But Jimmy's a little bit smaller, and he's been more available more consistently to his team than Kawhi Leonard, even in light of what happened last year in the postseason. So that's why I have Jimmy above Kawhi in this particular tier. But I actually think Jimmy's a little bit
under the radar going into this season. He obviously went down a slight level from last year, like we're actually starting to see just that little bit of a downturn from Jimmy Butler. He just was a little bit worse set most things last year, and then he also missed the playoff run due to injury. Albeit it was kind of a fluky fluky playing transition in the playing game, but that obviously is less than ideal when you're talking
about these player rankings. But he's also fourteen months removed from being the best player on a team that made it to within three wins of an NBA championship. So I just think it's too early to write him off. The unfortunate thing is, and I'm sure Miami Heat fans are starting to feel this a little bit, but it felt like Jimmy and Bam was this awesome championship foundation, and they just needed some higher level role players, particularly
a higher level offensive player in there somewhere. And there are all these opportunities over the years where Miami could have pounced on somebody, but they didn't. And now it might be too late because Jimmy's starting to decline a little bit, and so I don't know if they're even looking in that direction anymore, or if they're actually looking
to move on from Jimmy sooner than later. Who knows what the heater are going to try to do here, But it felt like there was a window there in that twenty twenty two to twenty twenty four timeline to try to capitalize on the Jimmy Bam cord. It feels like Miami might have missed out on that window. That said, Jimmy has a lot more good basketball to play. I've always referred to Jimmy as the bouncer at the championship club. He's not actually in the club, but he's the bouncer outside.
He's obviously not as good as the top tier superstars at the top of the league. But if your star is not a legitimate championship level superstar in that tier and he faces off with Jimmy. Jimmy will expose him, and that basically is the best way to describe the Miami Heat as a whole during this era. They expose teams that aren't good enough, aren't made of the right stuff to win a championship, but they end up losing to the real championship caliber teams when they inevitably face them.
Last year, they end up losing to the eventual champion. Even without Jimmy Butler, they lose to the eventual champion in Boston. The year before they make it to the finals, they lose to the eventual champion in Denver twenty twenty two. That Boston team was fa but if I'm not missaying, they were favored to win the championship. I ended up picking Golden State in that series, and Golden State ended
up winning. But Boston was the most talented team in the league that year and probably should have won that series. They were up to one and had Game four at home, But that's the team that ended up beating the Heat, right, And then go back to twenty twenty one, who beat them the Bucks the championship team. Go back to twenty twenty who beat them, the Lakers, the championship team, Right, So you guys kind of get the point, like, that's just kind of what Jimmy Butler and Miami have been
in the Eastern Conference. They've been the bouncer, and it's just unfortunate because had they invested more and been a little bit more aggressive to try to put more talent around this group, a group they very well might have gotten a championship, especially in one of the open seasons like twenty twenty two and twenty twenty one in particular. We're both kind of wide open. Yeah, Jimmy at twelve, just don't write him off yet. I think he's got a lot of good basketball left in him. So all right,
let's get to our mail bag. A ton of really good questions from you. Guys are going to be arguing a bunch of different stuff for a bunch of different players today. Hey, Jason, great video, and I like the series so far. Admittedly biased as a Celtics fan, but here's my basketball argument as to why JB should be higher than Booker. While I can see that Booker, all things equal, teammates, coaching staff, etcetera, is a better offensive
player overall than Jalen is. I think Jalen's offensive game is much more valuable to a team concept and works better in the postseason. You mentioned specifically that Booker generates easier shots for teammates in the half court. Looking back at the Suns getting swept by the Wolves, I think Booker struggled to play off the ball and that made
the Suns more predictable and easier to guard. Also, Booker isn't as athletic, or isn't athletic enough to blow by his defenders or finish through contact nearly as often as Jalen can. Booker is great at making tough shots. I watched him score seventy on US a few years ago, so I definitely respect that kind of skill, But that doesn't work against a great defensive team. Well, the Wolves swept them, and we kick their ass both times they
played US. I respect your basketball philosophy that half court shot creation is king, but when you consider play style on what works in the postseason, taking JB over Booker and even a couple other guys that I'm sure you will be highlighting in future VIDs, appreciate the content, and I specifically love your player rankings discussion. So keep them coming. Thank you for supporting the show, and thank you for taking the time to break down the basketball case for
why you disagree a couple things. I agree that Booker had a rough series, but for a different reason than you think. I actually thought it was more of an on ball issue and just him getting rushed and not making the easy reads that were available hits him that he had been making over the tail end of the season, and I think the Suns kind of identified that because look at the point guards that they've targeted this summer to try to have Booker play more off the ball.
I actually think Booker is just a like ten out of ten off ball player, just an incredible close out attacker, an incredible knockdown shooter. You saw that with Team USA. I mean that look how good he was in that particular role. But I do agree that that Devin Booker had a rough series. That said, he also has been pretty reliably great in the playoffs for the most part in his career. I mean, he's been hitting pull up jump shots. I mean he lit up the Lakers in
twenty twenty one. I had to watch that. That was hard for me to watch. I mean, obviously Anthony Davis wasn't out there, but I watched Devin Booker just hit every dayn pull up jump shot against the Laker team that I was rooting for. Look at that NBA Finals run, Like, how many times did you see him hit tough, contested pull up jump shots in Drew Holliday's face, And Drew was playing great defense. Like, Booker was pretty damn good in that NBA Final series. Obviously made a couple of
big mistakes. He had that big turnover. I think it was at the end of Game four if I remember correctly, but for the most part it might have been Game five. But yeah, like I think I thought last year was kind of somewhat of an outlier in that Booker had a rough series and it was kind of a tough matchup for him. But I actually think generally he's been
a very reliable offensive player. I do think Jalen Brown is a bit underrated as an offensive player, But I disagree with your point that you think Jalen's offensive game is more valuable to a team concept. I actually think it's the opposite. I think like Booker is especially good at playing with other good players. I think we saw that with Team USA, and so I think he actually accentuates the talents of those around him. A very good
point about Jalen's rim pressure. It's a specific skill that I think is underrated and very very important for all the positive impact that it gives to a team. But if you remember yesterday, I kind of read off the numbers. I can't remember him off the top of my head, but Devin Booker actually gets to the rim more than most guards. I think he was like, if I remember correctly, there was only four guards below six five or below sixty six or less, and Jalen was one of the
guys who was above him. But there's only four guys above Devin Booker. Devin Booker actually gets to the rim a ton. We did a breakdown on that yesterday. The main differentiator to me is the playmaking piece. Jalen's gotten better. We talked about that yesterday, but there's still a massive gap there. To me between Devin Booker and Jalen. Brown is a playmaker, and that I think makes him just a more impactful, substantially more impactful half court offensive player.
Substantially is maybe a little aggressive, but I think he's a more impactful half court offensive player, and as we've talked about, that's something I value a great deal. But really good points made, and thank you for laying it all out. And again, these are all really tough decisions to make, and that's why they were all right next to each other in the rankings. Hey, Jason, I think you're underestimating how well JB plays when he's the go
to number one option offensively. Tatum doesn't miss many games, but when he does, JB averages like thirty points a game. He's an elite scorer now and that can be a number one player on offense, I agree, which is a prerequisite for him to be in the tier of can be the best player on a championship team, even if it is with overwhelming support. That said, like I think Tatum is a clear like I have Tatum still a
tier above Jalen Brown. I think he's encroaching on it, and there's a chance that in the future they're on the same tier. But right now, Tatum is just a way better passer than Jalen Brown, and I think that's a big differentiator between the two of them. But again, the gap is closing. Tatum's going down a little level as his jump shot gets less reliable, and Jalen Brown's extending a level as his playmaking gets more reliable and his feel for the game and commitment to defense is improving,
like the gap is closing. But I still think that and I do agree that Jalen Brown is good enough to be the best player on a championship team. That's why he's in this tier that I still have Jason Tatum a full tier above him. Are you just projecting for the future or do you actually think Aunt is better than Booker right now? By no metric, is Aunt substantially better than Booker and he is definitively not on
a different tier. So I actually got into a discussion about this today with a buddy of mine covers the Suns. But I'm not going to talk about I had a lot of comments from people complaining about how high of Ant, which we haven't even gotten to Ant yet, and so I don't want to talk about necessarily how high he is until we get to Ant in the rankings, just because we're gonna have plenty of time to talk about
that in the next couple of weeks. But specifically with Booker, this is all I'm gonna say for now, I'm not gonna talk about Ant in the context of the league until we get to Ant, but specifically with Ant and Booker, I do think Booker is actually on a different tier than Ant as a supporting player. So if you put him as like a secondary or tertiary star, or if you put him on tmusa where he's playing alongside a
bunch of stars, I'd rather have Devin Booker. He just is a much more versatile basketball player in terms of his ability to fit his game into different types of small roles and to play alongside other stars, but specifically to be the best player on the team. I think Ant is on a different tier than Devin Booker. He's so transcendently athletic that it is just like a force
of nature. Over the course of eighty two games, Anthony Edwards was one of only two guards in the entire league last year to average at least six shot attempts in the restricted area per game and shoot at least
sixty five percent while he was there. And he did that with Rudy go Bear's awkward ass clogging things up in the paint, inable to catch anything and finish anything like I can only imagine what Anthony Edwards would look like if you picked him up and you dropped him in like a situation with some real spacing, Like if you dropped Anthony Edwards in Boston's five out attack, I think he'd be like a Yannis Zion level rim attacker. I think he'd literally get nine to ten restricted area
attempts per game. Like that's how difficult it is to keep him in front off the dribble. The problem is teams can really load up the strong side. Against Minnesota. It is their biggest weakness. It's why their offense fell upon against Denver in the middle part of that series, and their defense was the thing that was able to pull them out of that mess. But when they went down three to two and then against Dallas, their offense
completely fell apart for that exact same reason. Dallas knew, load up the strong side, bring your you know, just literally loaded up and take away the paint and they're just not gonna make enough jump shots. And that's literally what ended up happening. But like I think, Ant is a one of the very very few transcendently athletic players in the league. The other thing with Ant is, in addition to making strides as a playmaker in addition to
making strides as a defender. Ant is on this crazy run now where he's turned into like a pretty deadly accurate jump shooter, especially off the dribble. And so again, like, if I need a guy to play alongside another star or to play a small role on Team USA, give me Devin Booker ten out of ten times. But if I need a player to build a team around and to be my number one option for eighty two games and four rounds, I take Ant ten out of ten times.
So that's the specific dynamic for those two guys. But we'll talk more about Ant and his overall value because I have a bunch of stuff that I want to get into with Ant, but I just want to save it for later on when we actually cover him, because it just doesn't make sense to do it at this point in the greater scheme. I think you're right, there's very little room between the four players you have from
seventeen to fourteen. I would argue that one thing you underestimate is the ball security that Brunson brings to the table. His assist atorney over ratio is a huge factor and why the Knicks offense is successful similar to their offensive rebounding edge, which nets them in extra possessions and extra
scoring chances. That's a huge part of why Brunson is such a great offensive creator, as well as their transition defense, because he doesn't turn it over and the Knicks don't get caught for easy transition baskets and get to dictate
the pace of the game. So I'm not going to actually rebuttal this because I've talked a lot about why I've Brunson where he's ranked in yesterday's video, But I just thought this was a really interesting point about ball security and something that makes Brunson a very impactful half court shot creator. So I just wanted to share that with you guys, So thank you for the comment. I thought that was a really interesting point about what makes
Bruntson so good. And again, as far as like the rankings, as we talked about, they're all just really close to each other. I told you guys yesterday, if you put Brunson at twelve, I would totally get that. And it's these guys just wait, I'm already thinking about the top eleven and I still don't even know who I'm gonna put out eleven. I have a guy in mind right now, but I'm like tempted to switch it, and I'm gonna sleep on it all weekend and we'll see. But like,
just try ranking your top eleven players. It's insane. Like it's insane. Whoever gets put at eleven, it's gonna be a problem. Like whoever it is, like it, it's gonna be really interesting to see how that shakes out. Uh, here we go. If you thought Jalen put in work for the slander he got last season, just wait until
we see Tatum and Brown next season. One of them absolutely deserving of a huge role on the Olympic team where he barely got minutes, and the other feels strongly that he should have made the team and didn't even make the roster at all. Those two who are going to come out next season to prove themselves even more than the last season. I agree Jalen Brown. I tweeted out today that he's having a great summer. I don't think that was about vacation. I think that was about
the work he's putting in behind the scenes. I think Jalen Brown took the USA snub as well as just him getting a Finals MVP is just like a boost of confidence and a boost of motivation. And I actually think Jaylen Brown is poised to go up another level. And then I agree, I think I think Tatum's pissed. I think Tatum's pissed that he didn't play well. I think tatums piss that he didn't play well in the
postseason run. I shared this stat the other day. He shout out for fifty percent just three times in the entire playoff run. Like that's embarrassing for Jason Tatum. So like like, I think Jayson Tatum's gonna have a big bounce back year next year, and I think his jump SHOT's going to be fine. So I tend to agree with you. I think the Celtics. I mean, I haven't done my preseason rankings or anything, but I'm basically one hundred percent certain the Celtics are going to be my
title favorite. I think anybody would be foolish to pick against them at this point. There are lots of teams that can win the title, and I wouldn't be shocked
at all if Boston didn't win the title. If I have to choose the Field or Boston, I'd probably take the field, But Boston to me is a clear favorite, and I think it stems from the fact that they won the title despite the fact that Tatum didn't play particularly well and he's going to get better, and you know, in addition to the issues that Porzingis was having with his health. I think your logic is flawed when considering
defense versus offense. I do think offense is slightly more important, but stars who aren't very good defensively will hurt your team no matter how good they are defensively. Look at Minnesota versus Phoenix. You have two Phoenix players in your top fourteen because they are offensive stars, that being Kevin Durant and Devin Booker. They were shut down by superior defense. With defensive stars, the idea that offensive stars can play their way out of being bad on defense is just wrong.
The main difference between Phoenix and a team like Dallas is Dallas had the guys that can do the tough jobs like we talked about right, So, like they had Derek Jones Junior who could guard the ball, they had Derek Lively and Daniel Gafford who could both defend in different ways in their ball screen coverages. They had PJ. Washington, who could be like a legitimate low man like backside four who could get defensive rebounds and help and pick
and roll coverages. Right, So like they had those guys,
Phoenix didn't. Phoenix had a Kogi is a guy who could guard at the point of attack, but was nowhere near as good offensively as Derek Jones Junior was, who had turned himself into a pretty solid close out attacker and a guy that was couldn't make above the break threes as much as they needed him to, but hit enough shots Like Derek Jones was just better offensive player than Josh Kogi, And use of Nurkic is a disaster defensively compared to the Lively Gafford guys, Like specifically Lively,
I thought that Nurkic competed defensively and was a little underrated for how well he worked with his hands and got deflections and at least tried on defense, but he was certainly not a defensive anchor at the center position. And so like that's my point is like I'm not
saying that you can't. I'm not saying that you can build a good defense with offensive minded stars that don't defend I'm saying you can do that as long as you have guys that can fill the other roles on the floor that are the tougher defensive roles, which Phoenix did not have. Again, like, I'm of the opinion that if you just picked up Derek Lively and put him on the Suns, that they could craft a top ten defense there, because then at that point, it's like you
asked Kadie to be the low man. You've got Derek Lively to be your pick and roll defender. You've got you can put a guy like a Josha Kogi at the point of attack and you still have enough offensive talent around it. That's my thing is like Phoenix's issue isn't that their stars don't defend. It's that their stars don't defend, and they didn't have role players that could play defense at a really high level. That's the issue. Dallas didn't have that problem. To their credit, they built
a roster that could accommodate that. Is this ranking more based on the twenty twenty three to twenty twenty four performance or on the twenty twenty four to twenty twenty five expectation. I think that's important to clarify. Thank you so much, Jason, love the show, love your analysis. Although there's probably some different opinions, especially on those older superstars, I've already learned so much from your content. Thank you, Thank you for the sport, thank you for the kind words.
To be clear, this is meant from now Ford. If I was the entire purpose of the drill is or the list is if we had thirty teams and all four hundred and fifty players and we were doing a snake draft right now, I should just say a draft right now, because we're only doing twenty five players. Who would you take if with your first pick to build your franchise for this particular season upcoming and any in a vacuum, so irrespective of surrounding talent and within the
context of being the best player on your team. Next question. Before the Mitchell Robinson injury, Hartenstein looked was looked at as a backup big Since getting an opportunity, he has now earned himself an eighty million dollar contract. Wasn't it a ninety million? I thought it was three years ninety million. It could be wrong. How many other players are there in the NBA with the right opportunity that would be
able to do what Hartenstein has done. So it's just a huge influx in like a perceived value of the center position. I thought it was really fascinating between Jared Allen, who's like somewhere around like the eighth or ninth best starting center in the league, to Isaiah Hartenstein to Nick Claxton.
Those guys are in somewhere in the ten to twenty range, right, Like, these are all guys that are in the middle tier of starting centers, the top tier being obviously Jokicic and Anthony Davis and Joel Embiid and bam Adebaio and like Victor wimb Yama, and then you go down to this like next tier of like like role players starting centers
or like mid level starting centers. Nick Claxton got twenty five million a year, Hartenstein got I want to say, just under thirty, right, Like Jared Allen got just over thirty. And so the league is telling you that you need that position. And I think there's a couple different reasons why one pick and roll defense is so important and the ability to compete on the glass is so important, But another big part of it is just five out offense.
You need bigs that can set screens and roll hard to the rim and keep the ball moving from side to side. There's just a lot of value in that specific position. Like within Cleveland, like Evan Mobley's really struggling to score on the role, Jared Allen is not, so he's just such an important foundational piece for them, right. Isaia Hartenstein excellent, five out big. I haven't watched a ton of the Nets over the last couple of years, but Nick Claxton kind of fits into that tier as well.
If eighty and Lebron are both top ten players and clearly on a whole different tier from Jalen Brunson, why were the Lakers a playing team in the Knicks a two seed Brunson carried the Knicks not a big deal. Just doesn't make much sense to me. A couple things. First of all, the Lakers had forty seven wins and the Knicks had fifty wins, so there wasn't like some substantial gap there. Second of all, last year, the East
was incredibly weak at the bottom. As a matter of fact, the West went six hundred and fifty and five hundred and eighty against the East, so the West was seventy games over five hundred and had to head matchups with the Eastern Conference. An easy way to demonstrate the difference in the competition between the two conferences is the Lakers were seventeen and fifteen against teams that were in the top ten in point differential according to Cleaning the Glass.
The Knicks were nine and fifteen. So there's two things we can take away from that. One, the Knicks played top ten teams eight fewer times than the Lakers did. Second piece of that is that the the Lakers were just way they were above five hundred and the Knicks were well below five hundred in those matchups. So like, the Lakers are one of those teams, they're kind of weird. They I actually, I think the Lakers were one of
the better teams in the league last year. Not in the contender tier, but they were in that next tier of teams. I remember exactly where I put them in my championship rankings, but I want to say they were like fifth or sixth or something like that. But a big part of that was the Lakers were a really good team that had a bad stretch. If you look at their entire season, forty seven wins, but they had a three to ten stretch right after the n season tournament.
They were dominant up through winning the Ncason Tournament, and then they relaxed and played shit basketball for a month and it cost them in the standings. But outside of that, on both ends of that bracket, they were a really good team. And I mean look at that. I mean, if you guys watched them against Denver, they outplayed Denver the majority of that series. They got gamed by Jamal Murray twice, like the Nuggets pulled their crazy Houdini act
in the crunch time on the Lakers twice. Otherwise, the Lakes straight up out played the Nuggets in three of the five games, so like, and even Nuggets Nuggets players after the series talked about how the Lakers could have beaten them, you know what I mean. So like, I don't think the Lakers are a top tier championship contender. I don't think last year's Nicks were. But I thought
last year's Lakers were better than last year's Knicks. And I think, like a lot of times, people look at the playing tournament and they go like, oh, these two like eighty and Lebron are both top ten and they're not winning enough games, and it's like, actually, the West is just a damn bloodbath, and the Lakers were also incredibly poorly coached. The last piece of it, too, is
just the quality of role players. And this is the main issue here, because like Jalen, Brunson still won fifty games without a guy like eighty or Lebron next to him, and Lebron and eighty had each other. So I get your point. To be clear, I get the point you're trying to make. The main issue is quality of role players.
I talked about this before the Lakers surrounded Anthony Davis and Lebron with a bunch of specialists who are really good at specific things, but all have mass of glaring weaknesses. I actually was thinking about this the other day. Who is the best two way player on the Lakers other than Lebron and Ad. It's probably Austin Reeves. But Austin Reeves is at best an average to slightly above average point of attack defender at best, and he's your third
best player. D'Angelo Russell disaster on defense, Rouey Hachimura disaster on defense, Jared Vanderbilt disaster on offense. You know, guys like Jackson Hayes and Christian Jackson. Hayes was a disaster on defense. Christian Wood disaster on defense. He was good defensive rebounder, but struggled in a bunch of other areas. So like the Lakers didn't have any guys that could play both ends of the floor. Look at the Knicks,
even with their injuries. It's like Dante DiVincenzo, like a really solid two way player plays both ends of the floor really well. Like Josh hart Like a really solid two way player plays both ends of the floor really well. You know, ogn and Obi Just like a rock solid two way wing that plays both ends of the four really well. Isai Hartenstein, I think is a functional, solid
defensive center and a really good offensive center. Like the Knicks were a really good basketball team, by the way, I have them entering into my top tier championship contenders this year with the return of Julius Randall in the addition of Michale Bridges. Like I understand that Jalen Brunson overcame some adversity last year and I really enjoyed watching him,
But I also think the Knicks were good. I think the Knicks were good, Like I think if you just take Dante DiVincenzo and Josh Hart and swap him with D'Angelo Russell and Ruy Hatcher Mura. The Lakers become a much better team immediately, because now, all of a sudden, you got like these really good two way role players that you can put around Lebron James and Anthony Davis. And that, to me is the main issue that the
Lakers are having. And man, I hope they can figure it out at some point before they get into the postseason next year. But I do appreciate the point you're trying to make, and I do appreciate the comment. In no world could book be the best player on a championship team. Totally disagree. The twenty twenty one Sons were up two to OHO in the finals and just lost a couple clutch games at the end of the series.
I think Booker's clearly in that tier. I see a lot of young players jumping up a year from now. Bancaro will make a huge jump this year. So Paalow was my twenty sixth man, if I remember correctly. This year, I think I was torn between him and Paul George,
if I remember correctly. So I tend to agree that Palo is one of those guys that very well could have been on this list, and I also agree with you that I think the list is going to look very different next year because I think a bunch of young players are going to take leaps, and I also think some of our older guys are going to take
drops after this year. Two more questions. You said you had Luca higher than Giannis when considering that you had Booker over JB because being an offensive engine is just a much better value than being an overduiced role player. However, seeing how bad Luca was as a player defensively where they will deliberately attack him, and offensively he was missing
crucial three throws. He also struggled to shoot threes in that series and will steam out at the end of games while being turnover prone, compared to Giannis, who is as bad as he might be offensively still gives you thirty and fifteen with his best top ten defense. At least, you can't take the supporting cast being bad as an argument for Luca when people were bashing Giannis last year for underperforming in the Heat series while averaging thirty and
thirteen ish and not getting deliberately attacked on defense. Both have a second option highly skilled, undersized guards as a
second option. In my opinion, this is pretty much like a remake of the twenty nineteen MVP, but one here is still a thirty to fifteen to five guy while not being less than a top fifteen defender in the league, while the other is arguably the best offensive player in the league with conditioning issues while having the potential to be the worst defensive player on the court despite having
a great defensive coach like Jason Kidd. I actually saw a video of Luca's game winner against the Clippers the other this morning, and it was crazy to see how thin Luca looked, and it kind of got me concerned because then I was like, Okay, so we're all talking about how Luca needs to get in shape, but he seems to be kind of trending in the wrong direction in that specific department. A couple things. Luca had a disastrous defensive series against the Celtics, is the worst defensive
series I've ever seen from a star ever. But the Celtics present a very unique challenge, one that's basically unprecedented in NBA history, which is they put out five players that can all shoot, pass, dribble and defend, and that it's basically unprecedented and I don't think we'll ever see it again because those guys are all super expensive in
an open market. They have five thirty million dollar players and a lot of those guys are in existing contracts that in the future it would be sixty seventy million dollar contracts. So like, here's the thing, Luca embarrassed himself defensively in the finals. It needs to be talked about, and again for the record, trust me, it's getting factored in and it will it will matter when we get
later in the list. But the Celtics would have done that to a lot of different stars that have defensive issues. There are a lot of offensive minded stars that get hidden on defense. And it works against twenty nine of the teams usually or twenty eight of the teams, I should say, because they don't have five guys that can drill, a pass, shoot and defend like Boston does. So like some of that is like you got to tip the cap to Boston for just the type of roster they have.
But yeah, of course it was embarrassing for Luca. Of course it needs to be factored in. To me, though, I've seen plenty of examples of Giannis in his team losing playoff series because he can't execute in the clutch. You mentioned the series against the Heat in twenty twenty three. In that series, there were a couple of clutch games where Jimmy just walked down Yannis and Janis couldn't even make a little hook shot in the lane, and that
continues to be his biggest issue. And so for me, I feel like in the majority of matchups, I feel like I can cover for Luca defensively and he's still one of the best offensive players in the world, and that's why I have him over Yiannis on this list when we get to that point. But interesting argument, and I appreciate you taking the time to break it down. Last one. It makes me crazy when you make up
shit like this. The Mavericks held the number one offense in the NBA to one hundred and one points per game and never let them score more than a hundred seven any game of the series. They didn't have vast stretches where their defense was swamped. That's a complete lie and it's provable by the statistics. Stop making shit up. We have an angry Mavericks fan here, I'll just read some real basic numbers. In the first half of Game one, they gave up one hundred and thirty four offensive rating
to Boston. In Game two and a sixteen minute span over the second and third quarters, they allowed forty four points as Boston blew built the one point lead into a thirteen point lead. In Game three, in the second half, they gave up nineteen points in four minutes as Boston blew a seven point game into a twenty one point game. And in Game five, Boston had a one hundred and forty six offensive rating in the first half. So I don't know what fantasy land that Mavericks fan is living in,
all right, guys. That is all I have for today is always as sincerely appreciate you guys for supporting the show. We are taking the rest of the weekend off we have. This is actually airing on Saturday. The Mailbag is gonna air on a Sunday. Monday morning, are starting our Superstar tears. Still don't know who I'm gonna have at number eleven. I have my list. I haven't changed it yet, but I've been thinking about changing it. So we'll see what I end up deciding on Monday morning it should be
fun again. I appreciate you guys for supporting the show and for rocking with me. I'll see you guys on Monday. The Volume