A month before the election, Donald Trump promised Robert F. Kennedy Jr. a lead role in healthcare and his administration. I'm going to let him go wild on medicines. Kennedy has erroneously argued that vaccines can cause autism. That claim, like others, has been widely debunked by scientists. Among other questionable assertions Kennedy has made, fluoride in the public water system is poison, and AIDS isn't caused by the HIV virus.
These and other controversial or false claims could be at the center of federal U.S. health policy. If the Republican-controlled Senate were to confirm Kennedy as the new head of HHS, he would oversee nearly $2 trillion in mandatory spending, as well as agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, and the National Institutes of Health. NPR Stephen Fowler has been following the story.
Gold gives Kennedy the chance to actualize a vision that's often at odds with mainstream health and science, likely through a combination of scaling back existing programs and refocusing others to align with his quote, make America healthy again goals. Consider this, RFK Jr. has long desired to drastically transform health and healthcare policy in the United States. Soon, he may get his chance. NPR I'm Wanna Summers.
Donald Trump's on his way back. Want to know what's happening as the presidential transition is underway? The NPR Politics Podcast has you covered with the latest news and analysis. Listen to the NPR Politics Podcast. This message comes from Wondery. Some of the craziest conspiracy theories are actually classified government operations. To hear more about these hidden truths, listen to Redacted, declassified mysteries with Luke Lamana on the Wondery app or wherever you get your podcasts.
It's considered this from NPR. This week, President-elect Donald Trump announced Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as his nominee to run the Department of Health and Human Services. It's a move that's scared many science and health experts. Former HHS Secretary Kathleen Sibelius spoke on CNN yesterday. To have someone coming into a scientific agency that is a vaccine skeptic and may well undo decades of public health work, I think is terrifying for the American public.
HHS is a massive federal agency responsible for oversight, funding, and programs for public health and health care across the United States. To get a sense of just what leading such a vast apparatus might entail and how Kennedy might oversee it, we brought in Julie Robner, Chief Washington correspondent for KFF Health News. Hey, Julie. Hey, Wanna?
So Julie, as we were just pointing out, HHS is just this massive agency with a budget of almost $2 trillion, some 90,000 employees. Help us unpack this. What are some of the public health agencies that come under the HHS umbrella?
Well, of course, we have the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, some smaller, but still influential agencies like the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Health Resources and Services Administration.
And they oversee programs like the Ryan White AIDS Programs Community Health Centers, Maternal and Child Health Programs. Of course, HHS does more than just public health. They oversee Medicare and Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. And on the Human Services side, they oversee Child Care and Tana Foot used to be welfare payments and had starred in programs like Meals on Wheels for older Americans. So it is really a vast sprawling agency that affects almost every American.
I want to just zoom in on one of the things you mentioned and that's Medicare and Medicaid. Of course, the Federal Health Insurance Programs for the elderly, the poor and the disabled. What kind of power does the HHS Secretary have over those programs?
There are really significant power. Now, those programs are what we call mandatory spending. So the Secretary and in fact, many people at HHS have actually less power to change those programs. That really needs to be done by Congress. But they can certainly influence how those programs are implemented. There is a lot of guidance and regulations that they can write. And they can also hire and fire employees. And I think we're going to be hearing a lot about that.
I want to talk about this role from the management perspective. I mean, this agency is sprawling. It's got a huge budget, tens of thousands of employees. What kind of background have some of the people who have held this position previously had? More of them have had kind of a management background. It's only been fairly recently that we've seen actual doctors and public health professionals leading the agency. Those tend to lead the sub agencies at HHS.
Because it is so large. Interestingly, I think Robert F. Kennedy Jr. might actually have more power to change policy if he were to have a role in the White House. Because in recent administrations, much policy has been determined by the White House. And this is true for Republicans and Democrats.
Sort of power has been much more centralized at the White House. And the secretary ends up doing much more kind of ministerial duties. It's just such an enormous place. And there is so much to do that doesn't have to do with actual making of policy. Some of Kennedy's detractors, they make the point that he doesn't have an obvious background in science, medicine or policy for the practical work of running HHS. Is that present obstacles for him if he's confirmed?
Well, yes and no. I mean, certainly it is an enormous bureaucracy and it can be hard to make things happen. Even people who have worked there for years, who've become secretary, you know, like Alex Azar, who was in the first Trump administration, have suggested that really the secretary can only take one or two of their own initiatives.
And the rest of what they do is determined by the day to day action to the agency and by the White House. Trump has said that he would allow RFK Jr. to quote, go wild on medicines, food and health. He's long talked about some of his ambitions to overhaul health in the US a few examples. He's talked about removing fluoride from public water systems despite agreed upon health benefits.
He's also a noted vaccine skeptic who wants to regulate their use. He wants to revamp the nation's food policy. If he is confirmed as head of HHS, how achievable are those kinds of goals? Well, under existing norms, they wouldn't be very achievable. There are processes that you have to go through to do these things. Much of the workforce at HHS is protected by civil service rules. There are, you know, waves of people in between the secretary and where the policy gets made.
What we don't know is in the incoming Trump administration, whether they're going to try to throw all those things out, whether, you know, RFK Jr. has said he wants to fire hundreds of people at both NIH and FDA. It's unclear whether he's going to try to do that and if he tries to do that, whether he's going to succeed. So there's really a lot that's unknown right now.
Julie, to the extent that you've heard, what has been the response from workers within agencies that HHS overseas like the CDC or the FDA? They're frightened. I mean, a lot of them, you know, stuck it out during the first Trump administration, which was not not a great place to be for a lot of scientists. They felt like science was not taken very seriously. And that directions came down from on high that were not necessarily based on evidence that it was difficult for them to do their jobs.
You know, I live in the Washington area. I work with a lot of people who work at these agencies and a lot of them are talking about retiring early and that is a big concern that there could be an enormous brain drain from some of these agencies, even people who, you know, would not get fired just don't want to do this for another four years.
Many of our FK juniors views are either controversial and many have been debunked by science and health experts, but to your knowledge, are any of his stances actually supported by the mainstream? Yes, well, it's funny. A lot of his stances are generic and very popular, you know, things like getting rid of drug ads on TV that make everybody crazy, reducing industry influence in decisions that are made at the FDA and elsewhere in HHS.
Emphasizing chronic disease prevention, reducing food dies and other, you know, consumption of ultra processed foods. Those are things that are fairly popular and fairly mainstream. The question is how he would go about doing them and what he would replace them with?
Julie, I want to end with this. Here's a question I've got for you. We both have a deep knowledge of Capitol Hill. What are Kennedy's chances to you think of being confirmed? I honestly don't know. I think one of the wild cards that it's not really come out yet is that he's been in favor of abortion rights. And that, you know, one would think would be an absolute disqualifier for a lot of conservative Republicans will have to see as this goes forward. How it all shakes out?
Julie Robner is the chief Washington correspondent for KFF health news and host of the podcast What the Health. Julie, thank you. Thank you. This episode was produced by Mark Rivers and Megan Lim. It was edited by Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Samian again. Thanks to our consider this plus listeners who support the work of NPR journalists and help keep public radio strong supporters also hear every episode without messages from sponsors learn more at plus dot NPR dot work.
It's consider this from NPR. I'm Wana Summers. Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to consider this sponsor free through Amazon music or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get consider this plus at plus dot NPR dot org. That's plus dot NPR dot org.