If you've ever had a job where you worked for tips, here's an economic proposal you might find appealing. It's called No Tax On Tips. No Tax On Tips. Earlier this year, Donald Trump began pitching this idea of ending federal income tax on tipped wages. And then, this month... We will continue our fight for working families of America. Kamala Harris echoed the idea of No Tax On Tips during a speech in Nevada. And eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers.
So you can hear some enthusiasm for this policy idea, right? But you know who actually hates this idea? Economists. And tax experts. Like Howard Gleckman. It's a terrible idea. Gleckman is a senior fellow at the Urban Brookings Tax Policy Center. He and other economists say, this is actually a bad idea for many reasons. For one, there's unfairness. For instance, why should a waiter get part of their income tax-free, but the dishwasher in the back doesn't?
Nor would someone who works a cash register at a grocery store. And then there's a concern that some people could gain the system. Like, what would stop a high-paid corporate lawyer from claiming their six-figure salary as tips? So consider this. Leaders in both parties are pushing this idea of tax-free tips. How do their proposals differ? And is there any way to avoid the downsides economists are warning about? From NPR, I'm Adrian Ma.
Support for NPR comes from Carvana, presenting this message. Whether you're the kind of shopper who knows exactly what you want, or the kind who likes to weigh out every option, Carvana is the convenient way to shop for a car online. Visit Carvana.com to shop thousands of affordable car options. They're all over the internet and bumping out of people's cars. They're the songs of the summer. And this year includes the domination of Charlie XCX and Brat Summer.
She's really tapping into this moment where we are all chronically online, but also chronically outside. We are talking about the songs of the summer, and why they're so catchy and inescapable. Listen to the pop culture happy hour podcast from NPR. The Constitution, our founding document, says a lot about how our country has evolved and who we want to be. But it's not set in stone.
So for the next month, we'll be taking into the history behind some of its most pivotal amendments. Listen to We the People on the Thurline Podcast from NPR. It's considered this from NPR. Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are on the same side of one issue, which is getting rid of taxes on tips. But what would that really look like in practice? And how could these policies be written in a way that is fair and doesn't just create opportunities for people to avoid taxes?
My colleagues over at NPR's Daily Economics Podcast, the indicator, have been looking into potential guardrails for a policy that many economists believe could easily go off the track. Darian Woods and Whalen Wong take it from here. She had an ESTITION, you know, SKINCARE, beauty treatments. And she says she got into it because of her own acne. And she says when a customer has come in with it, it is quite satisfying to treat. I think acne is like my favorite thing ever. You love acne.
I love acne. I've had Shannon and I both enjoy watching pimple popping content on social media. Sorry, dear. No comment. Look, I'm not going to yuck your yarn as they say. It's very compelling. It's incredibly disgusting. I can't look at it. Now Shannon has her own business in New York and we spoke there with the treatment table between us. Shannon says the mid range for ESTITIONS in New York is about $22 an hour plus commissions and tips.
Her employees earn about a third of their income through tips. We're talking $30 an hour or even more. Shannon gets tips too. So this proposal to make those tips tax-free sounds almost too good to be true. If you do not have to pay taxes on those tips, would that be a good thing for you? Am I allowed to say yes? You're allowed to. Absolutely. This would help out. Shannon thinks other workers and business owners might be tempted to change their fee schedules so that more income comes in as tips.
I think it will change the people's perspective on how they structure everything. That is one of the big concerns from the tax experts, like Howard Gleckman from the Urban Brookings Tax Policy Center. When you tax income in different ways, people are going to work very hard to characterize their income in the lower tax form. Howard points to plenty of historical examples where a regulation or lower taxes for some types of income have meant that people changed how they get compensated.
We all now take employer-sponsored health insurance for granted. Everybody, you have a job, you expect to get health insurance through your job. That didn't exist before World War II. The Stabilization Act of 1942 froze wages and benefits. It was part of a wartime effort to control inflation. But it had a big exception. Pension plans and insurance could grow. So they did. It led to these big, all-encompassing health insurance plans being a very normal part of American compensation in a job.
This very American health gas system is a historical accident fueled in part by people seeing loopholes and using them. Another example that really highlights what happens when you tax two different forms of compensation differently is something big shot financial people know really well. Hedge fund managers, private equity partners, they have learned that getting paid a salary doesn't work out the best for them tax wise.
If you're somebody, particularly somebody who's making a lot of money and you can turn your income into capital gains, you're going to be paying a maximum rate of 20% if it's ordinary income or wage income, you're going to be paying a 37%. So there's a big incentive to change the way your income is categorized. Some call this the carried interest loophole. It's when in lieu of some salary, these finance people get a share of the profits from the deals the company's worked on.
That's then taxed at that lower capital gains rate as it's considered a profit on selling an asset. The end result of all these loopholes and carveouts means that the tax code can be game. Laws intended to benefit one group might actually benefit another and the government finds it harder to raise revenue. So we pose the challenge to how it if the elimination of taxes on tips had to be made, how could the unintended consequences be minimized?
What kind of guardrails could be put in place to reduce gaming of the system like that hypothetical corporate law over the tip chart? So this starts getting really complicated. I mean you could you certainly could put in income limits. Capping the income at which you can get tax free tips is something that Kamala Harris said she would do. So that would stop those wealthy white collar workers and claiming their income as tips. Donald Trump's proposal doesn't have that detail.
You certainly could try to define those occupations that are eligible for the tax exempt tips and those that aren't. Again, this is something that Harris has included in her proposal to only allow this for hospitality and service workers. Trump again hasn't specified this. That said how it is skeptical that this would solve the problem. He says that people like freelancers can redefine what industry they're in.
They will game the system. They'll change the nature of their work just enough so it fits a definition and allows them to get the income. Howard says this behavior could even boil over into outright fraud. And the root of this he says comes down to a broader problem with the IRS. You can put down anything. The IRS doesn't have the resources to IDU to determine what your occupation really is. So it sounds like boosting IRS resources might be part of your big policy proposal.
Oh, I'm a fan. I think it's a great idea. Ultimately though, Howard was just kind of playing along with us. The bottom line really is, you know, it's unworkable. You can't. I mean, I'm not going to sit here and try to fix something that shouldn't happen and shouldn't actually be fixed. Well, I appreciate you being game at least enough to think about the hypothetical. Yeah, I try, but I'm not going to help them out on this. They're making this mess. They got to get out of it themselves.
But Howard thinks what really support tipped workers would be an increase in the federal tipped minimum wage, which is currently at $2.13 an hour. Yeah, that surprises a lot of people. I mean, this very state by state, of course. But for some states, that is the minimum wage for tipped workers. Yeah, I mean, $2.13 that's like barely going to buy you a fountain drink at the restaurant you're working at, you know?
Yeah, and so Howard hopes that maybe bringing up that tipped minimum wage could push back against this entire system of compensating people through the wins of their customers. When you got a Europe in these less pressure to tip, how do you feel? I feel great. I actually, I, I'm one of those people who, who really does resist the whole tipped in culture. Yeah, I bet how it hates those pop-up screens that are everywhere asking for tips left and right.
Yes. And Kamala Harris's proposal is paired with an increase in the minimum wage. But it's unclear yet whether that's an increase in the tipped minimum wage. Trump hasn't advocated for an increase in the minimum wage. And so just stepping back, do we think that removing taxes on tips is actually likely to happen? You know, it's a bipartisan issue, politicians on both sides of the aisle support it.
You've got Republican Senator Ted Cruz who introduced a bill, the No Tax on Tips Act earlier this summer. Democratic representatives Stephen Horzford said last week he's going to introduce another bill. This one's going to be called the Tipped Income Protection and Support Act. So there's a real possibility it might happen. This might also have something to do with Nevada being a battleground state.
It's a big state for tipped workers. You got one in five workers there working in leisure and hospitality. Oh, wow. Yeah. So no doubt. It may not please the Howard Glickman's of this world, but it's good politics. That was Whalen Wong and Darian Woods from the Indicator from Planet Money Podcast. This episode was produced by Angel Carreras. It was edited by Kaken Cannon and Adam Rainey. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan.
And one more thing before you go, you can now enjoy consider this as a newsletter. We're still going to help break down the major story of the day, but you'll also get to know our producers and hosts in some moments of joy from the all things considered team. You can sign up at npr.org slash consider this newsletter. It's consider this from NPR. I'm Adrian Ma. Okay, so tell me if this sounds like you. You love NPR's podcasts. You wish they weren't interrupted by sponsor breaks like this one.
And you want to support NPR's mission of creating a more informed public. If this does sound like you, then it's time to sign up for perks across more than 20 podcasts with the NPR plus bundle. Learn more at plus.npr.org. If you're hearing this, that means you haven't gone sponsor free with NPR plus. Join us on the plus side for awesome podcast perks across more than 20 NPR podcasts, including bonus episodes behind the scenes content, sponsor free listening and more.
Learn more and sign up at plus dot npr dot org and never hear this promo again. Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to consider this sponsor free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get consider this plus at plus dot npr dot org. That's plus dot npr dot org.