191. Mutual Funds vs ETFs - podcast episode cover

191. Mutual Funds vs ETFs

Oct 30, 202338 minEp. 191
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

On this episode of A Wiser Retirement™ Podcast, Casey Smith, Michaela Dowdy, and Andrew Pratt, CFA, discuss the differences between mutual funds and ETFs. They also talk about why you shouldn't be stuck in the mutual fund mentality.

Podcast Episodes Referenced:
- Ep 165: 5 Principles of Successful Investing
- Ep 96: Small Cap ETF Selection Process

Youtube Videos Referenced:
- Are Financial Advisors Paid by Mutual Funds?

Learn More:
- About Wiser Wealth Management
- Schedule a Complimentary Consultation: Discover how we can help you achieve financial freedom.
- Access Our Free Guides: Gain valuable insights on building a financial legacy, the importance of a financial advisor for business owners, post-divorce financial planning, and more!

Stay Connected:
- Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | Twitter
- A Wiser Retirement® YouTube Channel

This podcast was produced by Wiser Wealth Management. Thanks for listening!

Transcript

Mutual Funds vs. ETFs

Hadley

Welcome to a Wiser Retirement Podcast . Before we get started with the episode , I want to tell you about a new e-book available on our website called "Buyer Beware, Why do they keep trying to sell you that annuity ? ' . This e-book covers the various types of annuities , negatives to owning annuities, and better investment alternatives to annuities .

To download this e-book , you can click the link in the episode notes or go to wiser investor . com and you'll find it at the bottom of the page . Now on to today's episode .

Casey

Welcome to Wiser Retirement Podcast . Where we believe the best financial advice should always be conflict free . I'm your host , Casey Smith , guiding you to financial freedom today are my co-host , Michaela Dowdy and Andrew Pratt . Hey guys , hey Casey .

Michaela

Hey .

Casey

So we got team Wiser here today . Andrew is our investment manager and Michaela is our planning associate , and I would like to know who schedules the podcast right after a Braves game . Who's in charge of that ?

Michaela

That is marketing . Yeah .

Casey

So this will post . This podcast will post , October 30th , but today, the Braves have entered the playoffs and we almost lost our game two last night but we came through . Right, I'm wearing my support today .

I tried to buy the best tickets possible , kind of picky about where I sit and this , this go around , I just went on with the masses and I bought the tickets , like when it comes available to the public on ticket master . And it's crazy . Have you guys ever done that ?

It's like they put you in queue and I was like number 3000 , and it counts down and finally its like , hey , its your turn to pick your tickets . And there's all these dots everywhere where all available seats are , and the dots are disappearing .

It created so much anxiety that I think I'd rather pay five times the amount at Stubhub and carefully choose my seats right . And so I was like I don't know , left field corner all right , let's do that . And so I was looking for four tickets .

That ended up , you know , there were no tickets available for four , so I dropped it to three and then some of them were popping , but they were disappearing pretty quick . So I was like pick those , man , great deal , 75 bucks . But I've never sat in that section ever .

And so I just thought I was going to be sitting in the left field corner , like I had no idea that there was an overhang and I was the back of the underneath section , so you couldn't see the fireworks , you couldn't see the jumbotron , you couldn't see the ball if it left the bat and it didn't go to the ground .

And so me and the kids are sitting there and they're all looking to me like really , this is a best you could do , but it was a cool atmosphere . Yeah , it was a cool atmosphere , so hopefully we have a good rest of the playoffs . But anyway , we're grateful for what you got right , not what you want to have .

Hadley

That's what it comes down to . Beggars can't be choosers , right .

Michaela

I was definitely the beggar .

Casey

All right . So you know we talk a lot about financial planning and we don't dive all in our podcasts into individual securities at all .

You know we're a firm that focuses really mostly on index funds , but I've just noticed lately in some of our meetings that we've had talks about mutual funds and ETFs and people trust the process and I understand that , but I'm a dork so I like going into the weeds sometimes right . And so it's .

I wanted to highlight the differences between mutual funds and ETFs today , because you know there are so many , you know , mid-sized financial planning firms that we end up managing assets .

Clients come to our firm and I just picture these old guys , you know , sleepy , still wearing coats and ties to work , and they have their mutual fund , their mutual fund selections that they have . They've been using them since the 1980s , you know .

And so when I think of mutual funds , wherever I see a portfolio full of mutual funds , I think of two things one , a firm that doesn't know how to get with the times and the efficiency of modern day investing .

And then the second thing I think about is oh , they must be getting paid commissions because typically , at your Edward Jones locations and your other brokers , that they're getting a trailing fee from this mutual fund which we'll dive into .

So whenever I see those , I'm typically kind of turned off by going oh , okay , we have an old school portfolio here , but there's also very specialized mutual funds that are still in existence that probably have a purpose in portfolios . We're just not using those currently in our current environment , but anyway .

So let's go back a high level here and talk about mutual funds versus ETFs . So how would we explain that to someone ?

Andrew

Yeah , I mean , I think , starting off , mutual funds and ETFs are very similar in that they represent a basket or a pool of underlying securities and for the most part they are very diversified . They're not very concentrated from a holding standpoint , but there are a lot of differences , whether it's the structure , the tax treatment , et cetera .

So , going into some of these differences , I guess , first off , mutual funds come set to the trading and mutual funds are priced at the end of the day , whereas ETFs , you can actually buy and sell shares throughout the day when the market is open . So that is one big difference right off the bat between mutual funds and ETFs .

Casey

Liquidity, so you go to sell your mutual fund and you get the price after the market has closed and everyone knows what the prices of things are . Where when in ETF , the unique creation redemption process allows for it to trade intraday .

So there could be a situation in a thinly traded ETF where the net asset value , the value of the underlying securities , doesn't match the price , meaning meaning that you could be paying a premium for those basket of securities or you'd be getting them at a discount now at our big big box firms . You know your black rock , your vanguard , your state streets .

That's not really a big , a big issue .

Andrew

Right and you know mutual funds and ETFs are different costs and fees and with you know , both have a management for your expense ratio typically meet ETFs are usually less because they're very more passive , not as actively managed . But you know , I will say with ETFs and not to get too technical here there are implicit and explicit costs .

And implicit calls really means refers to that liquidity , that bid ask spread .

But as you said and mentioned , like the big , each big ETFs they're , you know , with a lot of assets , those bid ask spreads are very tight and they trade close to that net asset of value and you're not going to have as wide of a spreads but you know that they're only traded ones can have that implicit call . So that's something to be aware of .

Casey

But you know both have some sort of net expense ratio or management fee attached to them so you basically you could buy an ETF and you could be paying a big premium and you think that you're buying something really relatively inexpensive , but in the end you actually pay maybe 2 or 3% more than what the basket was worth .

That's correct and it's really hard for everyday people to go and figure that out right . So , yeah , so you guys , you can't stick to like the obscure ETFs . You need to stick to the mainstream ETFs , right For those at home doing their own investing . So we talk about how they're traded . What about how they're managed ?

Andrew

Yeah , I , mean so primarily , when you think of ETFs , they are passively managed and that means that they're just tracking the benchmark and they're trying To perform in line with a certain benchmark . And that benchmark could be that's S&P500 , it could be a sector , it could be the broad bond market index , so it could be . You know it varies .

You know whatever index that this ETF sponsor is trying to create , whereas most mutual funds are actively managed and they're trying to outperform a certain benchmark . You know whether it's the U . S . market .

Casey

You know that's S&P100 right , I don't know , but there's more actively traded ETFs coming on the market now . I mean , there's lots of them now . I remember at the beginning of ETFs back in , I guess around 04 to 08 , most of them were passive , right , and now they have inverse ETFs that do the opposite of what the market does . Don't buy those .

They have a leverage ETFs . Obviously , you know , 3x the market on the upside . Then there's just media funds that have all but shut down their funds and moved into ETF world , right , and they used to be . Oh , with ETF it's good .

And you know , I get frustrated because I feel like the the industry should start calling them ETPs , exchange traded products , and then you would have your , your funds that were active and then passive . You also have , you know , other things , like some of the commodity funds are actually ETNs , exchange traded notes . I mean , they don't actually own anything .

They just is a promissory note by a bank to pay you the performance of something , right ? So we don't use ETNs for that reason . You know , I think about this is this is way back . But you go back to like , when layman shut down during the financial crisis , they had three ETNs that shut down . People just lost all their money right .

So people don't , people don't really think about this risk until they are in that situation .

Andrew

Yeah , and to your point I would just really , you know , if you know what we look at is obviously the underlying security and portfolio , and you know , if you're trying to do this on your own , there are . There are those risky , you know funds out there like ETNs , or you know highly leveraged ETFs .

Even that you don't really know , like , what the risk is unless you're doing a deep dive on the analysis .

Casey

I think one of the so costs can be very different . Each of funds can be more expensive . ETFs should be cheaper . Average cost of our ETFs is around point zero eight of a percent per year , but the S&P 500 you can buy at point zero three , most ETFs and most platforms for trade for free to no transaction costs . I think the biggest difference is taxes .

So that's correct . You have a substantial amount of money inside a brokerage account and you have mutual funds . What's gonna happen , Michaela ?

Michaela

You're gonna get a nice tax bill at the end , when all the cost basis comes to you , right ?

Casey

So what, so what the situation is like in 2022, you had a loss that year . You lost money , but , yeah , you still got a capital gains tax bill because of all the trading that took place in the portfolio and so for , especially for large brokerage accounts , the use of mutual funds just doesn't make any sense .

When you have an ETF that can replicate that strategy and they have the very unique creation redemption process with the AP , the authorized participant , and when that happens , they're able to shelter the , the shareholders , from from having to have that tax bill . Now , if you sell the ETF and you make a profit , you're gonna pay capital gains tax .

Right , doesn't protect you from that , but it certainly protects you from being able to or surprise tax bills at the end of the year .

Andrew

Yeah , and you know , obviously when you sell an asset at a gain , you're gonna have to realize those capital gains . But , as you mentioned , with mutual funds , if there's a lot of turnover in that fund , they , you know , could dispute a surprise additional capital gain at the end of the year because of that turnover .

Casey

Yeah , so I think that you know they kind of transition that further . Let's see , if a portfolio full of mutual funds , you have to look at what the cost differences between the funds , the mutual funds and the ETFs .

And so let's say that you realize that you could save a thousand dollars a year but you've got a twenty thousand dollar capital gains will take 20 years to break even . But actually if you go and look at the taxes , how much and how much are you paying in taxes on the capital gains ?

That's typically 15% , so 15% of your capital gains bill would also be going away . So when you do that , you can apply it to the cost basis , right , or To the break even point , and so a lot of times it break even comes down to like three years after that , right .

So that's something to think about when you're looking at an old school media fund portfolio and clients don't seem to push back on that .

Michaela

No , not often , unless we've had a few , I think , lately , where , especially if you get blindsided by leveraged ETFs that have this insane return over a very short period of time , but the risk in those is so great that sometimes , if the client's just looking at the rate of return , or mutual funds really do pride themselves on beating the market over and over

and over again . And so when you have clients that come in and they're like I'm going to get the best rate of return ever , I want to beat the market . But then you know you go back to reality of realizing , well , in all actuality , there's what a 4% chance they do .

Andrew

Yeah so 2% , 2% over 20 years .

Michaela

Yes , so it really is like well , you're likely not going to have that happen and so just going back to those basics and explaining really what we're explaining in this podcast of ETFs and mutual funds , both are great investment vehicles , but really ETFs are going to hopefully have that better return for you in a more passive way , depending on if you're going in

a passive direction .

Casey

So the leveraged ETFs talk with that

Leveraged ETFs, Active Management, and Mutual Funds

for a minute . So I remember walking around ETF conference in 2009 . You know , this is right after February of 2009 . So we've just gone through '08 , which is a very dismal year , say the least , and people were so shocked and it's like every panel .

You have a panel about something not even related to ETFs and somehow it all come back talking about leveraged ETFs because these are relatively new products at the time . But people lost money in an inverse S&P 500 ETF . So you think , oh my gosh , the market's going to be totally down in '08 .

After what happened at the end of '07 , I'm going to buy this leveraged ETF product and I'm going to make it 15 , 20% of my portfolio and I'm going to save the day for my clients . These are advisors walking around .

There's no clients here , it's just advisors , and I think the I'll have to go back and research that , but my memory , if serves me correctly , is around 16% . Loss is what you lost by owning a leveraged inverse leverage ETF . And what people don't understand is it resets daily , so it really depends on how many up days or down days that you have .

It has very little to do with , it has nothing to do with annual return . It's daily return , right . And so when the leverage resets daily , you could have a lot of little down days and then you have one big up day that could potentially erase all the down days and , worse , put you into the red . And so that's where people , people get kind of greedy .

The idea behind leverage ETFs when they were created so that you would buy it at the open to hedge your position , but you would liquidate it by the close . So it's supposed to be a day trading instrument only and not to be held overnight . But you have retail investors who buy these things and they don't read the prospectus and they don't understand .

If they did , they probably wouldn't understand it and they end up in a really bad position , right . And there's more . You know there's more up days and down days , typically right . Or you have bigger up days and sometimes the best up days are after the worst down days in volatile markets . So statistically it just doesn't .

Andrew

It doesn't make sense as to why you would own a leverage ETF unless you're doing some very complicated trading strategy for the day , right , yeah , and I think that's where we come in as advisors and portfolio managers just again understanding what these products are like , what's in them , what are the risks to the overall portfolio as allocation , and , you know ,

that's where I think we provide that benefit to our clients .

Casey

So you know it's yeah , it's definitely understanding the process and the product . There are ETFs that do other things . For example , you know there's COWZ pacers ETF , COWZ that buys the 100 most free cash flow companies in the Russell 3000 , I believe 1000 or 1000 . Okay , and the Russell 1000 .

But that's basically a computer that's saying okay , this is our selection and it's replicating that . You know , every single quarter it's resetting itself .

Andrew

So that's , that's active management , that's active management ETF and you know , with active ETFs they are coming more onto the scene , so they are a little bit higher fee . But when I'm saying higher fee , I'm not talking about 1% , I'm talking about maybe 15 to 20 basis points or you know so , not even close to 1% .

But you know they do have that active component and they might have like a systematic process where there there's a screen , you know , looking at the top cash flow yielding , our free cash flow yielding companies in the Russell 1000 , but there's maybe a subjective component saying , hey , this isn't fit our mandate and we might make a few changes based on that .

Casey

Yeah , right , you know something ? You don't see a shift to 401k plans for a minute . You don't see ETFs in 401k plans .

Andrew

You don't .

Casey

And it's possible , it can exist , it can be built . I think there's some . There's some strut stretching you have to do there , but okay . So mutual funds , N at the end of the day , very simple . Now . And when you place a trade on the ETF , typically you should be placing that trade with a limit order because you're buying a stop .

So if you're buying if we were buying 50,000 shares or something there could be a good chance . On the other end , there's not 50,000 shares that won't be purchased , or if they do , it's had at a higher price . It starts climbing this price ladder right .

Well , imagine that in a 401k plan , like what's the best execution strategy , we have a fiduciary obligation to put forth the best execution strategy as a firm , but you may not have that inside a custodian in a 401k plan , and so basically , the ETF could be purchased and who's monitoring the price of that ?

And how do participants know and how do you measure that ? I mean , so you potentially have some bad actors that could be making more margin on those trades . And really big plans . I think what we typically see in really large plans is like what CITs, cumulative investment trusts which have cost somewhere to ETFs , if not cheaper , on the big plans .

So I don't know that ETFs will show up and said 401k plans , and that's certainly a place that mutual funds still seem to serve a very good purpose inside this plans .

And going back to fees again , mutual funds will pay 121 fees , not inside a 401K plan hopefully I had seen one recently that has 12B1 fees but basically it's paying the advisor commission , a recurring commission , to own that fund .

Something else that you see and I should mention this earlier if you go down to your bank , if you go down to an Edward Jones location , you go to buy a mutual fund , a lot of times there's a 4.25% commission on the front end , so you're going to pay 4.25% to buy the Amidst fund and then they're going to have to pay another 0.8 to 1.2% per year in 12-1

fees , right , and in expenses when the ETF typically is purchased for free . so $100 in $100 goes into being invested and there's no commission being paid to anyone . If you did pay a commission , you're paying it directly to the broker to buy the ETF .

Andrew

And I will say too , with the large brokerage like Schwab and Fidelity , there usually is a ticket charge for mutual funds and I think typically it's like $20 on the buy and sell . So that's something to be aware of and probably doesn't make the most sense to like given your asset level . You know , if you have a lot of assets maybe it makes economic sense .

But you know , with ETFs there are for the most part no explicit calls or trading fees at the large brokerage houses and really there's really no minimum investment , so you could just buy one share at the price of the ETF .

Casey

So shifting gears . We have a lot of podcasts on this . I don't want to stay here too long . But you think about active . So mutual fund managers are typically active managers . Michaela has already mentioned that there's a 2% chance they beat the market over a 20-year period .

So in a short term though , they have like this 35% success rate , which is why you see them advertised . They'll say you know , we beat the lip or average over the last five years like three to five years is kind of their sweet spot and when the active managers could potentially outperform .

What you have to understand is we talk about this almost , I think , about every episode . We bring up the spy report , but people don't understand this and it's so frustrating that they're not grasping it .

But basically , you have the S&P 500 or the S&P tracks , indexes and active managers and says hey , based on how you invest your money , here's an appropriate benchmark . Do you beat that over the long term ? The answer is no .

You know large cap managers have a 2% chance over a 20-year period , about a 6% chance over 10 years , and then it increases from there in the shorter time period . Actually , one year is really bad . So when you're building out , you know these .

When you're looking at your investment portfolio and you see nothing but mutual funds and active managers , high fees , inefficient , investing right and you're making someone else very wealthy . Am I wrong , Andrew ? You come from a world that still has some mutual funds . I believe right . I think your old firm have some of these funds in the portfolios .

Andrew

So there are some cases where I think mutual funds do make sense and again they have to be high quality mutual funds from established firms . I mean I'll just say , like DFA , they've been around for a long time , based on academic research .

But really to me mutual funds make the most sense in certain asset classes and that's like fixed income or maybe even international equities . I'd say international equities maybe not so much recently , but you know these markets are more fragmented , they're not as efficient as the US market , so you do see better outperformance in these markets .

Casey

That's because they're active managers , not just buying based on market cap . They're buying with some other rule that they're using .

Andrew

Right , and there are more . You know again , there's a lot more dislocation in those markets . You know , especially in the market , a lot more opportunities for active management to outperform . But yeah , I would say generally , you know , from the large wire houses that are pushing ETFs or , sorry , mutual funds , you don't really see exposure to those type of funds .

It's more about the high commission , the high fee that are not properly or you know that don't have a good asset allocation .

Casey

If they all say American funds and Lord Abbott , I would be concerned . Right , those are the most expensive funds in the business , right ? But , Michaela , when you guys are doing planning , do you ? Do you see any resistance of like ? No , this is my mutual fund , or is it ? Is it more focused on , just like , tax issues ?

Michaela

It's more focused on tax issues most of the time . Most clients are really receptive to ETFs once they're explained . I think it's such a new , even though it's been around for 25 , 30 plus years now .

I think they started in the 1990s officially and even though they are , you know , on the market that long , it's not something that's the norm , I guess , for the industry . Still it's getting to that point . But a lot of people have heard about mutual funds . It's historically what their parents invested in , it's what their grandparents invested in .

They've been around since the 1920s . Like that's the safe option , it seems like , for people , even if they're paying that premium . So it's kind of explaining the difference of hey , the market is shifting and this actually is a better option for you in the long run , and that was a phenomenal option for them because it was the option they had provided .

But now there's a better one and it's just like the first draft isn't as good as the second draft and I think this is almost the second draft of a mutual fund kind of life . Yeah .

Casey

In the 60s and 70s everybody was buying individual stocks and then in the 80s we had mutual funds . And then , you know , the S&P 500 was created .

Spiva was created in 1991 , I believe , for the purpose of being able to hold assets in the S&P 500 while they're trying to choose which stock to buy after , you know , after a while , so they wouldn't miss out on market performance . And then that carried on into the early 2000s when we started adding more .

The ice years products came out , sort of adding more diversified mutual funds .

Funds vs ETFs and Direct Indexing

And then now I would argue that mutual funds versus ETFs is going to be an old conversation and a couple of years from now we're going to be talking about direct indexing .

And then we kind of go back full circle where we're going to have 116 securities inside of a portfolio individually selected by software that probably somewhat the same software that built the ETF , right , except you . You're just kind of building your own ETF and for us this is going to be as important as some other firms that have agendas in their investing .

But think about being able to buy the S&P 500 and you're going to replicate that . And then the tax , the whole new level of tax efficiency you have in direct indexing , so that's probably the future .

As I've said many times , we're an indexing firm and ETFs are the vehicle for that right now , but it may not be that way in a few years and you don't want to be first . You don't want to be first in that environment . We need others to go ahead that can fail and perfect the process , but that is something that we're certainly watching .

Andrew

Yeah , and I actually do have experience with direct indexing and there are a lot of different offerings out there and I think right now one , you know , one limitation is just the minimum investment size , but those are starting to come down some .

And then you know , as you mentioned , casey , the they call it tax alpha , but the additional you know tax savings you can get from , you know , these vehicles is phenomenal .

Casey

So if , when you think about you know media funds obviously inside a , inside an IRA , it's not that big a deal because you don't have any negative tax consequences . So it's really in brokerage accounts . So if you have a media fund inside an IRA , why would you care about switching it to an ETF ?

Andrew

Let me think about that . I would say so within an IRA . One thing you do see with mutual funds and again , not all mutual funds , but a lot of them they do carry a little bit of an extra cash in their portfolio and that's you might be paying a fee for .

You know you're paying a more expensive fee to hold , for the portfolio , to hold that cash , and a lot of managers do this because they're just holding like a little cash buffer in case there is a you know a flood on the fund . There's a lot of redemption requests coming in , so sometimes people refer to as a cash track on that return .

So again , not every you know mutual fund is like this , but there are a lot of them that you know where they might have a lower performance versus an ETF that tracks the same , similar benchmark .

Michaela

Yeah .

Casey

I could see that . I go back to fees as well . You know , lower the overcost , overall cost of this . I mean , if you drop your investment cost by half a percent , that's huge over a long time period .

Michaela

So , speaking of fees , do y'all think that ETFs will ever like develop more fees than we're seeing now ? Like , do you think bigger like these big brokerage houses are actually going to start charging to trade ETFs at some point ? Or are we going to start seeing there be more fees in ETFs overall ?

Casey

I think the trend in that has been no less and less fees . I mean , if someone can make a free ETF and figure out how to make a penny on it somehow , I think they would do it , simply because you know for all , first of all , Schwab launched the whole free trade thing and totally changed the landscape of brokerage houses .

TD Ameritrade doesn't exist anymore because of it . And then on the ETF side , you know there's a price war between State Street , Blackrock and Vanguard on the S&P 500 . I remember when it was like 0 . 1% and then that was cheap and now it's like 0.03 . And so if they just drop it by one basis point , then they get more market share .

So it's about claiming who has the most in assets , I guess now on the flip side , it's kind of like hey , this is our free offering . It's kind of like the gimmick when you walk into the store you know , buy one , get one free right , but in the meantime they have all this ESG propaganda that you know . Don't even get me started .

We have a whole podcast on me ranting on on ESG , but . But basically is what I'm saying is it's not . I'm not weighing in on the ESG political statement . There is staying away from that . What I'm talking about is the S&P 500 has the highest ESG rating . Our portfolios have the highest ESG rating .

However , Blackrock , especially , has come out with ESG funds that perform worse than the S&P 500 . Right , have the same rating as the S&P 500 and charge you five times as much . They make 56 million dollars more year off of one large cap ESG fund . Yet our S&P 500 , which has nothing to do with ESG .

We probably own less than a half a percent of companies that maybe wouldn't show up in the ESG fund , right , right ? and yet we save 56 million dollars in fees . So it's , it's , I caught .

Well , I don't , I didn't , I didn't create this , but it's called greenwashing , where you , you say , oh we're , we're environmentally social and government's focused , and then the end , what you just did is what you just ? You just increased your cost by 5x and , and , and you made Larry Fink at Blackrock like even more wealthy than the areas and more powerful .

Yeah , and so I just kind of roll my eyes and like this is this is no different than the low vol funds . Back in the day , they came out with low volatility funds because , you know , after the financial crisis , things are so volatile and everyone moves and like herd mentality , so they all hurried to buy low vol . So many people what bought low vol ?

It became more volatile than the S&P 500 itself . Right , and so you have to be so careful as an asset manager that you're not following the marketing guidelines of whatever is out there . You know , right , it's like when we had the oil spill and the Gulf of Mexico .

You know , I was just waiting for , like the , because a lot of oil companies have high yield bonds . I was waiting for the high yield bond ex oil . You know , it's just marketing , is , is , is very . They want to manage your money . They want to manage your money because they get a percentage of that .

So you , you have to still steer clear of the gimmicky stuff and make sure you focus on the core .

Andrew

Yeah and again . We've already said this a few times . But going back to the ESG example , you really again have to just focus on what's in the portfolio and these ESG rapper funds .

They claim that they have this high ESG score but in the end they're , you know , mirroring what's in the S&P 500 , you know , just passive general ETF , and they're really not that different from a market cap waiting so no , it's no different than the other focused mutual funds that have exist .

Casey

And you know there's other also people out there that have the Patriot funds , that buy everything that's pro America . ESG companies you know , and those are underperforming too . They have periods or they they've done well , but they're very short time periods .

In the end , you want to leave politics out of your portfolio building and you you want to leave your emotions out of your portfolio building , because of course it's kind of go hand in hand . But there's no place for that and you just have to manage based on what is worked over the long term . I call them long-term healthy asset classes , right ?

So S&P 500 , it's been pretty hard to beat . Very few of us over over a 20-year period and it's probably gonna continue to be that way . But the S&P 500 itself is no , hey , it's pretty woke , right .

I mean , yeah , it's all the things that we get frustrated about because that's what's , that's what's kind of the movement it's happening in these large companies , but we're not gonna buy a fund that advertises that on the on the wrapper and we had to pay it , you know , 5x for it . That's crazy , right . All right , you know we have a YouTube channel .

You guys ever watch the YouTube channel ? A Wiser Retirement .

Michaela

I've watched it , you've been on it , I have been on it . You're a feature . You know , I just I only watch mine .

Casey

All right , so a Wiser retirement . Find that on YouTube . You can watch us live or not live , but watch us recording or a podcast . But we also have some other educational things we do on the on the YouTube channel that are separate from from the podcast . We have one that we've linked here, 'Are Financial Advisors Paid by Mutual Funds ? ' .

That's a good one, well , I don't know , tune in , go find that go find out . Podcast , episode 165, 'Five Principles of Successful Investing' . That's a great episode to learn about the basics of building portfolios .

And then episode 96 back in the day, thats an old episode we talked about this selection of small cap ETFs , kind of like how we would go through and and weed out funds to pick , pick a fund . Let's see what else . Yep , thanks for listening to today's episode .

If you're interested in learning more about Wiser Wealth Management or want to schedule a consultation , meet with one of our financial advisors . You can do so by going to wiser investor . c om or you can click the link in the episode episode notes . All right , thanks guys , and thank you listeners . We'll see you next week .

Hadley

Thanks for listening to a Wiser Retirement Podcast . We hope you enjoyed today's episode . Make sure to subscribe wherever you're listening . That way you don't miss any new episodes . We'd also appreciate if you could leave a rating and review . If you have any questions about anything that was discussed today head to wiserinvestor . com and reach out .

This episode was produced and edited by Ken Hoadley . This podcast is strictly for informational purposes only and is not to be considered as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial products , securities , digital assets or any other investment vehicles or a basis to make any financial decisions .

Wiser wealth management incorporated , is a registered investment advisor with SEC . The host and or guest may personally own securities , digital assets or other investment vehicles mentioned on this podcast .

Neither the host nor guest of the show are compensated for their participation and no referral fees are paid to or received by any host or guest for Clients , listeners or similar interests . Investments involve risk and , unless otherwise stated , are not guaranteed .

Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial advisor , tax professional , insurance professional and or legal professional before implementing any strategy discussed here , and past performance is not indicative of future performance .

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android