¶ Mutual Funds vs. ETFs
Welcome to a Wiser Retirement Podcast . Before we get started with the episode , I want to tell you about a new e-book available on our website called "Buyer Beware, Why do they keep trying to sell you that annuity ? ' . This e-book covers the various types of annuities , negatives to owning annuities, and better investment alternatives to annuities .
To download this e-book , you can click the link in the episode notes or go to wiser investor . com and you'll find it at the bottom of the page . Now on to today's episode .
Welcome to Wiser Retirement Podcast . Where we believe the best financial advice should always be conflict free . I'm your host , Casey Smith , guiding you to financial freedom today are my co-host , Michaela Dowdy and Andrew Pratt . Hey guys , hey Casey .
Hey .
So we got team Wiser here today . Andrew is our investment manager and Michaela is our planning associate , and I would like to know who schedules the podcast right after a Braves game . Who's in charge of that ?
That is marketing . Yeah .
So this will post . This podcast will post , October 30th , but today, the Braves have entered the playoffs and we almost lost our game two last night but we came through . Right, I'm wearing my support today .
I tried to buy the best tickets possible , kind of picky about where I sit and this , this go around , I just went on with the masses and I bought the tickets , like when it comes available to the public on ticket master . And it's crazy . Have you guys ever done that ?
It's like they put you in queue and I was like number 3000 , and it counts down and finally its like , hey , its your turn to pick your tickets . And there's all these dots everywhere where all available seats are , and the dots are disappearing .
It created so much anxiety that I think I'd rather pay five times the amount at Stubhub and carefully choose my seats right . And so I was like I don't know , left field corner all right , let's do that . And so I was looking for four tickets .
That ended up , you know , there were no tickets available for four , so I dropped it to three and then some of them were popping , but they were disappearing pretty quick . So I was like pick those , man , great deal , 75 bucks . But I've never sat in that section ever .
And so I just thought I was going to be sitting in the left field corner , like I had no idea that there was an overhang and I was the back of the underneath section , so you couldn't see the fireworks , you couldn't see the jumbotron , you couldn't see the ball if it left the bat and it didn't go to the ground .
And so me and the kids are sitting there and they're all looking to me like really , this is a best you could do , but it was a cool atmosphere . Yeah , it was a cool atmosphere , so hopefully we have a good rest of the playoffs . But anyway , we're grateful for what you got right , not what you want to have .
That's what it comes down to . Beggars can't be choosers , right .
I was definitely the beggar .
All right . So you know we talk a lot about financial planning and we don't dive all in our podcasts into individual securities at all .
You know we're a firm that focuses really mostly on index funds , but I've just noticed lately in some of our meetings that we've had talks about mutual funds and ETFs and people trust the process and I understand that , but I'm a dork so I like going into the weeds sometimes right . And so it's .
I wanted to highlight the differences between mutual funds and ETFs today , because you know there are so many , you know , mid-sized financial planning firms that we end up managing assets .
Clients come to our firm and I just picture these old guys , you know , sleepy , still wearing coats and ties to work , and they have their mutual fund , their mutual fund selections that they have . They've been using them since the 1980s , you know .
And so when I think of mutual funds , wherever I see a portfolio full of mutual funds , I think of two things one , a firm that doesn't know how to get with the times and the efficiency of modern day investing .
And then the second thing I think about is oh , they must be getting paid commissions because typically , at your Edward Jones locations and your other brokers , that they're getting a trailing fee from this mutual fund which we'll dive into .
So whenever I see those , I'm typically kind of turned off by going oh , okay , we have an old school portfolio here , but there's also very specialized mutual funds that are still in existence that probably have a purpose in portfolios . We're just not using those currently in our current environment , but anyway .
So let's go back a high level here and talk about mutual funds versus ETFs . So how would we explain that to someone ?
Yeah , I mean , I think , starting off , mutual funds and ETFs are very similar in that they represent a basket or a pool of underlying securities and for the most part they are very diversified . They're not very concentrated from a holding standpoint , but there are a lot of differences , whether it's the structure , the tax treatment , et cetera .
So , going into some of these differences , I guess , first off , mutual funds come set to the trading and mutual funds are priced at the end of the day , whereas ETFs , you can actually buy and sell shares throughout the day when the market is open . So that is one big difference right off the bat between mutual funds and ETFs .
Liquidity, so you go to sell your mutual fund and you get the price after the market has closed and everyone knows what the prices of things are . Where when in ETF , the unique creation redemption process allows for it to trade intraday .
So there could be a situation in a thinly traded ETF where the net asset value , the value of the underlying securities , doesn't match the price , meaning meaning that you could be paying a premium for those basket of securities or you'd be getting them at a discount now at our big big box firms . You know your black rock , your vanguard , your state streets .
That's not really a big , a big issue .
Right and you know mutual funds and ETFs are different costs and fees and with you know , both have a management for your expense ratio typically meet ETFs are usually less because they're very more passive , not as actively managed . But you know , I will say with ETFs and not to get too technical here there are implicit and explicit costs .
And implicit calls really means refers to that liquidity , that bid ask spread .
But as you said and mentioned , like the big , each big ETFs they're , you know , with a lot of assets , those bid ask spreads are very tight and they trade close to that net asset of value and you're not going to have as wide of a spreads but you know that they're only traded ones can have that implicit call . So that's something to be aware of .
But you know both have some sort of net expense ratio or management fee attached to them so you basically you could buy an ETF and you could be paying a big premium and you think that you're buying something really relatively inexpensive , but in the end you actually pay maybe 2 or 3% more than what the basket was worth .
That's correct and it's really hard for everyday people to go and figure that out right . So , yeah , so you guys , you can't stick to like the obscure ETFs . You need to stick to the mainstream ETFs , right For those at home doing their own investing . So we talk about how they're traded . What about how they're managed ?
Yeah , I , mean so primarily , when you think of ETFs , they are passively managed and that means that they're just tracking the benchmark and they're trying To perform in line with a certain benchmark . And that benchmark could be that's S&P500 , it could be a sector , it could be the broad bond market index , so it could be . You know it varies .
You know whatever index that this ETF sponsor is trying to create , whereas most mutual funds are actively managed and they're trying to outperform a certain benchmark . You know whether it's the U . S . market .
You know that's S&P100 right , I don't know , but there's more actively traded ETFs coming on the market now . I mean , there's lots of them now . I remember at the beginning of ETFs back in , I guess around 04 to 08 , most of them were passive , right , and now they have inverse ETFs that do the opposite of what the market does . Don't buy those .
They have a leverage ETFs . Obviously , you know , 3x the market on the upside . Then there's just media funds that have all but shut down their funds and moved into ETF world , right , and they used to be . Oh , with ETF it's good .
And you know , I get frustrated because I feel like the the industry should start calling them ETPs , exchange traded products , and then you would have your , your funds that were active and then passive . You also have , you know , other things , like some of the commodity funds are actually ETNs , exchange traded notes . I mean , they don't actually own anything .
They just is a promissory note by a bank to pay you the performance of something , right ? So we don't use ETNs for that reason . You know , I think about this is this is way back . But you go back to like , when layman shut down during the financial crisis , they had three ETNs that shut down . People just lost all their money right .
So people don't , people don't really think about this risk until they are in that situation .
Yeah , and to your point I would just really , you know , if you know what we look at is obviously the underlying security and portfolio , and you know , if you're trying to do this on your own , there are . There are those risky , you know funds out there like ETNs , or you know highly leveraged ETFs .
Even that you don't really know , like , what the risk is unless you're doing a deep dive on the analysis .
I think one of the so costs can be very different . Each of funds can be more expensive . ETFs should be cheaper . Average cost of our ETFs is around point zero eight of a percent per year , but the S&P 500 you can buy at point zero three , most ETFs and most platforms for trade for free to no transaction costs . I think the biggest difference is taxes .
So that's correct . You have a substantial amount of money inside a brokerage account and you have mutual funds . What's gonna happen , Michaela ?
You're gonna get a nice tax bill at the end , when all the cost basis comes to you , right ?
So what, so what the situation is like in 2022, you had a loss that year . You lost money , but , yeah , you still got a capital gains tax bill because of all the trading that took place in the portfolio and so for , especially for large brokerage accounts , the use of mutual funds just doesn't make any sense .
When you have an ETF that can replicate that strategy and they have the very unique creation redemption process with the AP , the authorized participant , and when that happens , they're able to shelter the , the shareholders , from from having to have that tax bill . Now , if you sell the ETF and you make a profit , you're gonna pay capital gains tax .
Right , doesn't protect you from that , but it certainly protects you from being able to or surprise tax bills at the end of the year .
Yeah , and you know , obviously when you sell an asset at a gain , you're gonna have to realize those capital gains . But , as you mentioned , with mutual funds , if there's a lot of turnover in that fund , they , you know , could dispute a surprise additional capital gain at the end of the year because of that turnover .
Yeah , so I think that you know they kind of transition that further . Let's see , if a portfolio full of mutual funds , you have to look at what the cost differences between the funds , the mutual funds and the ETFs .
And so let's say that you realize that you could save a thousand dollars a year but you've got a twenty thousand dollar capital gains will take 20 years to break even . But actually if you go and look at the taxes , how much and how much are you paying in taxes on the capital gains ?
That's typically 15% , so 15% of your capital gains bill would also be going away . So when you do that , you can apply it to the cost basis , right , or To the break even point , and so a lot of times it break even comes down to like three years after that , right .
So that's something to think about when you're looking at an old school media fund portfolio and clients don't seem to push back on that .
No , not often , unless we've had a few , I think , lately , where , especially if you get blindsided by leveraged ETFs that have this insane return over a very short period of time , but the risk in those is so great that sometimes , if the client's just looking at the rate of return , or mutual funds really do pride themselves on beating the market over and over
and over again . And so when you have clients that come in and they're like I'm going to get the best rate of return ever , I want to beat the market . But then you know you go back to reality of realizing , well , in all actuality , there's what a 4% chance they do .
Yeah so 2% , 2% over 20 years .
Yes , so it really is like well , you're likely not going to have that happen and so just going back to those basics and explaining really what we're explaining in this podcast of ETFs and mutual funds , both are great investment vehicles , but really ETFs are going to hopefully have that better return for you in a more passive way , depending on if you're going in
a passive direction .
So the leveraged ETFs talk with that
¶ Leveraged ETFs, Active Management, and Mutual Funds
for a minute . So I remember walking around ETF conference in 2009 . You know , this is right after February of 2009 . So we've just gone through '08 , which is a very dismal year , say the least , and people were so shocked and it's like every panel .
You have a panel about something not even related to ETFs and somehow it all come back talking about leveraged ETFs because these are relatively new products at the time . But people lost money in an inverse S&P 500 ETF . So you think , oh my gosh , the market's going to be totally down in '08 .
After what happened at the end of '07 , I'm going to buy this leveraged ETF product and I'm going to make it 15 , 20% of my portfolio and I'm going to save the day for my clients . These are advisors walking around .
There's no clients here , it's just advisors , and I think the I'll have to go back and research that , but my memory , if serves me correctly , is around 16% . Loss is what you lost by owning a leveraged inverse leverage ETF . And what people don't understand is it resets daily , so it really depends on how many up days or down days that you have .
It has very little to do with , it has nothing to do with annual return . It's daily return , right . And so when the leverage resets daily , you could have a lot of little down days and then you have one big up day that could potentially erase all the down days and , worse , put you into the red . And so that's where people , people get kind of greedy .
The idea behind leverage ETFs when they were created so that you would buy it at the open to hedge your position , but you would liquidate it by the close . So it's supposed to be a day trading instrument only and not to be held overnight . But you have retail investors who buy these things and they don't read the prospectus and they don't understand .
If they did , they probably wouldn't understand it and they end up in a really bad position , right . And there's more . You know there's more up days and down days , typically right . Or you have bigger up days and sometimes the best up days are after the worst down days in volatile markets . So statistically it just doesn't .
It doesn't make sense as to why you would own a leverage ETF unless you're doing some very complicated trading strategy for the day , right , yeah , and I think that's where we come in as advisors and portfolio managers just again understanding what these products are like , what's in them , what are the risks to the overall portfolio as allocation , and , you know ,
that's where I think we provide that benefit to our clients .
So you know it's yeah , it's definitely understanding the process and the product . There are ETFs that do other things . For example , you know there's COWZ pacers ETF , COWZ that buys the 100 most free cash flow companies in the Russell 3000 , I believe 1000 or 1000 . Okay , and the Russell 1000 .
But that's basically a computer that's saying okay , this is our selection and it's replicating that . You know , every single quarter it's resetting itself .
So that's , that's active management , that's active management ETF and you know , with active ETFs they are coming more onto the scene , so they are a little bit higher fee . But when I'm saying higher fee , I'm not talking about 1% , I'm talking about maybe 15 to 20 basis points or you know so , not even close to 1% .
But you know they do have that active component and they might have like a systematic process where there there's a screen , you know , looking at the top cash flow yielding , our free cash flow yielding companies in the Russell 1000 , but there's maybe a subjective component saying , hey , this isn't fit our mandate and we might make a few changes based on that .
Yeah , right , you know something ? You don't see a shift to 401k plans for a minute . You don't see ETFs in 401k plans .
You don't .
And it's possible , it can exist , it can be built . I think there's some . There's some strut stretching you have to do there , but okay . So mutual funds , N at the end of the day , very simple . Now . And when you place a trade on the ETF , typically you should be placing that trade with a limit order because you're buying a stop .
So if you're buying if we were buying 50,000 shares or something there could be a good chance . On the other end , there's not 50,000 shares that won't be purchased , or if they do , it's had at a higher price . It starts climbing this price ladder right .
Well , imagine that in a 401k plan , like what's the best execution strategy , we have a fiduciary obligation to put forth the best execution strategy as a firm , but you may not have that inside a custodian in a 401k plan , and so basically , the ETF could be purchased and who's monitoring the price of that ?
And how do participants know and how do you measure that ? I mean , so you potentially have some bad actors that could be making more margin on those trades . And really big plans . I think what we typically see in really large plans is like what CITs, cumulative investment trusts which have cost somewhere to ETFs , if not cheaper , on the big plans .
So I don't know that ETFs will show up and said 401k plans , and that's certainly a place that mutual funds still seem to serve a very good purpose inside this plans .
And going back to fees again , mutual funds will pay 121 fees , not inside a 401K plan hopefully I had seen one recently that has 12B1 fees but basically it's paying the advisor commission , a recurring commission , to own that fund .
Something else that you see and I should mention this earlier if you go down to your bank , if you go down to an Edward Jones location , you go to buy a mutual fund , a lot of times there's a 4.25% commission on the front end , so you're going to pay 4.25% to buy the Amidst fund and then they're going to have to pay another 0.8 to 1.2% per year in 12-1
fees , right , and in expenses when the ETF typically is purchased for free . so $100 in $100 goes into being invested and there's no commission being paid to anyone . If you did pay a commission , you're paying it directly to the broker to buy the ETF .
And I will say too , with the large brokerage like Schwab and Fidelity , there usually is a ticket charge for mutual funds and I think typically it's like $20 on the buy and sell . So that's something to be aware of and probably doesn't make the most sense to like given your asset level . You know , if you have a lot of assets maybe it makes economic sense .
But you know , with ETFs there are for the most part no explicit calls or trading fees at the large brokerage houses and really there's really no minimum investment , so you could just buy one share at the price of the ETF .
So shifting gears . We have a lot of podcasts on this . I don't want to stay here too long . But you think about active . So mutual fund managers are typically active managers . Michaela has already mentioned that there's a 2% chance they beat the market over a 20-year period .
So in a short term though , they have like this 35% success rate , which is why you see them advertised . They'll say you know , we beat the lip or average over the last five years like three to five years is kind of their sweet spot and when the active managers could potentially outperform .
What you have to understand is we talk about this almost , I think , about every episode . We bring up the spy report , but people don't understand this and it's so frustrating that they're not grasping it .
But basically , you have the S&P 500 or the S&P tracks , indexes and active managers and says hey , based on how you invest your money , here's an appropriate benchmark . Do you beat that over the long term ? The answer is no .
You know large cap managers have a 2% chance over a 20-year period , about a 6% chance over 10 years , and then it increases from there in the shorter time period . Actually , one year is really bad . So when you're building out , you know these .
When you're looking at your investment portfolio and you see nothing but mutual funds and active managers , high fees , inefficient , investing right and you're making someone else very wealthy . Am I wrong , Andrew ? You come from a world that still has some mutual funds . I believe right . I think your old firm have some of these funds in the portfolios .
So there are some cases where I think mutual funds do make sense and again they have to be high quality mutual funds from established firms . I mean I'll just say , like DFA , they've been around for a long time , based on academic research .
But really to me mutual funds make the most sense in certain asset classes and that's like fixed income or maybe even international equities . I'd say international equities maybe not so much recently , but you know these markets are more fragmented , they're not as efficient as the US market , so you do see better outperformance in these markets .
That's because they're active managers , not just buying based on market cap . They're buying with some other rule that they're using .
Right , and there are more . You know again , there's a lot more dislocation in those markets . You know , especially in the market , a lot more opportunities for active management to outperform . But yeah , I would say generally , you know , from the large wire houses that are pushing ETFs or , sorry , mutual funds , you don't really see exposure to those type of funds .
It's more about the high commission , the high fee that are not properly or you know that don't have a good asset allocation .
If they all say American funds and Lord Abbott , I would be concerned . Right , those are the most expensive funds in the business , right ? But , Michaela , when you guys are doing planning , do you ? Do you see any resistance of like ? No , this is my mutual fund , or is it ? Is it more focused on , just like , tax issues ?
It's more focused on tax issues most of the time . Most clients are really receptive to ETFs once they're explained . I think it's such a new , even though it's been around for 25 , 30 plus years now .
I think they started in the 1990s officially and even though they are , you know , on the market that long , it's not something that's the norm , I guess , for the industry . Still it's getting to that point . But a lot of people have heard about mutual funds . It's historically what their parents invested in , it's what their grandparents invested in .
They've been around since the 1920s . Like that's the safe option , it seems like , for people , even if they're paying that premium . So it's kind of explaining the difference of hey , the market is shifting and this actually is a better option for you in the long run , and that was a phenomenal option for them because it was the option they had provided .
But now there's a better one and it's just like the first draft isn't as good as the second draft and I think this is almost the second draft of a mutual fund kind of life . Yeah .
In the 60s and 70s everybody was buying individual stocks and then in the 80s we had mutual funds . And then , you know , the S&P 500 was created .
Spiva was created in 1991 , I believe , for the purpose of being able to hold assets in the S&P 500 while they're trying to choose which stock to buy after , you know , after a while , so they wouldn't miss out on market performance . And then that carried on into the early 2000s when we started adding more .
The ice years products came out , sort of adding more diversified mutual funds .
¶ Funds vs ETFs and Direct Indexing
And then now I would argue that mutual funds versus ETFs is going to be an old conversation and a couple of years from now we're going to be talking about direct indexing .
And then we kind of go back full circle where we're going to have 116 securities inside of a portfolio individually selected by software that probably somewhat the same software that built the ETF , right , except you . You're just kind of building your own ETF and for us this is going to be as important as some other firms that have agendas in their investing .
But think about being able to buy the S&P 500 and you're going to replicate that . And then the tax , the whole new level of tax efficiency you have in direct indexing , so that's probably the future .
As I've said many times , we're an indexing firm and ETFs are the vehicle for that right now , but it may not be that way in a few years and you don't want to be first . You don't want to be first in that environment . We need others to go ahead that can fail and perfect the process , but that is something that we're certainly watching .
Yeah , and I actually do have experience with direct indexing and there are a lot of different offerings out there and I think right now one , you know , one limitation is just the minimum investment size , but those are starting to come down some .
And then you know , as you mentioned , casey , the they call it tax alpha , but the additional you know tax savings you can get from , you know , these vehicles is phenomenal .
So if , when you think about you know media funds obviously inside a , inside an IRA , it's not that big a deal because you don't have any negative tax consequences . So it's really in brokerage accounts . So if you have a media fund inside an IRA , why would you care about switching it to an ETF ?
Let me think about that . I would say so within an IRA . One thing you do see with mutual funds and again , not all mutual funds , but a lot of them they do carry a little bit of an extra cash in their portfolio and that's you might be paying a fee for .
You know you're paying a more expensive fee to hold , for the portfolio , to hold that cash , and a lot of managers do this because they're just holding like a little cash buffer in case there is a you know a flood on the fund . There's a lot of redemption requests coming in , so sometimes people refer to as a cash track on that return .
So again , not every you know mutual fund is like this , but there are a lot of them that you know where they might have a lower performance versus an ETF that tracks the same , similar benchmark .
Yeah .
I could see that . I go back to fees as well . You know , lower the overcost , overall cost of this . I mean , if you drop your investment cost by half a percent , that's huge over a long time period .
So , speaking of fees , do y'all think that ETFs will ever like develop more fees than we're seeing now ? Like , do you think bigger like these big brokerage houses are actually going to start charging to trade ETFs at some point ? Or are we going to start seeing there be more fees in ETFs overall ?
I think the trend in that has been no less and less fees . I mean , if someone can make a free ETF and figure out how to make a penny on it somehow , I think they would do it , simply because you know for all , first of all , Schwab launched the whole free trade thing and totally changed the landscape of brokerage houses .
TD Ameritrade doesn't exist anymore because of it . And then on the ETF side , you know there's a price war between State Street , Blackrock and Vanguard on the S&P 500 . I remember when it was like 0 . 1% and then that was cheap and now it's like 0.03 . And so if they just drop it by one basis point , then they get more market share .
So it's about claiming who has the most in assets , I guess now on the flip side , it's kind of like hey , this is our free offering . It's kind of like the gimmick when you walk into the store you know , buy one , get one free right , but in the meantime they have all this ESG propaganda that you know . Don't even get me started .
We have a whole podcast on me ranting on on ESG , but . But basically is what I'm saying is it's not . I'm not weighing in on the ESG political statement . There is staying away from that . What I'm talking about is the S&P 500 has the highest ESG rating . Our portfolios have the highest ESG rating .
However , Blackrock , especially , has come out with ESG funds that perform worse than the S&P 500 . Right , have the same rating as the S&P 500 and charge you five times as much . They make 56 million dollars more year off of one large cap ESG fund . Yet our S&P 500 , which has nothing to do with ESG .
We probably own less than a half a percent of companies that maybe wouldn't show up in the ESG fund , right , right ? and yet we save 56 million dollars in fees . So it's , it's , I caught .
Well , I don't , I didn't , I didn't create this , but it's called greenwashing , where you , you say , oh we're , we're environmentally social and government's focused , and then the end , what you just did is what you just ? You just increased your cost by 5x and , and , and you made Larry Fink at Blackrock like even more wealthy than the areas and more powerful .
Yeah , and so I just kind of roll my eyes and like this is this is no different than the low vol funds . Back in the day , they came out with low volatility funds because , you know , after the financial crisis , things are so volatile and everyone moves and like herd mentality , so they all hurried to buy low vol . So many people what bought low vol ?
It became more volatile than the S&P 500 itself . Right , and so you have to be so careful as an asset manager that you're not following the marketing guidelines of whatever is out there . You know , right , it's like when we had the oil spill and the Gulf of Mexico .
You know , I was just waiting for , like the , because a lot of oil companies have high yield bonds . I was waiting for the high yield bond ex oil . You know , it's just marketing , is , is , is very . They want to manage your money . They want to manage your money because they get a percentage of that .
So you , you have to still steer clear of the gimmicky stuff and make sure you focus on the core .
Yeah and again . We've already said this a few times . But going back to the ESG example , you really again have to just focus on what's in the portfolio and these ESG rapper funds .
They claim that they have this high ESG score but in the end they're , you know , mirroring what's in the S&P 500 , you know , just passive general ETF , and they're really not that different from a market cap waiting so no , it's no different than the other focused mutual funds that have exist .
And you know there's other also people out there that have the Patriot funds , that buy everything that's pro America . ESG companies you know , and those are underperforming too . They have periods or they they've done well , but they're very short time periods .
In the end , you want to leave politics out of your portfolio building and you you want to leave your emotions out of your portfolio building , because of course it's kind of go hand in hand . But there's no place for that and you just have to manage based on what is worked over the long term . I call them long-term healthy asset classes , right ?
So S&P 500 , it's been pretty hard to beat . Very few of us over over a 20-year period and it's probably gonna continue to be that way . But the S&P 500 itself is no , hey , it's pretty woke , right .
I mean , yeah , it's all the things that we get frustrated about because that's what's , that's what's kind of the movement it's happening in these large companies , but we're not gonna buy a fund that advertises that on the on the wrapper and we had to pay it , you know , 5x for it . That's crazy , right . All right , you know we have a YouTube channel .
You guys ever watch the YouTube channel ? A Wiser Retirement .
I've watched it , you've been on it , I have been on it . You're a feature . You know , I just I only watch mine .
All right , so a Wiser retirement . Find that on YouTube . You can watch us live or not live , but watch us recording or a podcast . But we also have some other educational things we do on the on the YouTube channel that are separate from from the podcast . We have one that we've linked here, 'Are Financial Advisors Paid by Mutual Funds ? ' .
That's a good one, well , I don't know , tune in , go find that go find out . Podcast , episode 165, 'Five Principles of Successful Investing' . That's a great episode to learn about the basics of building portfolios .
And then episode 96 back in the day, thats an old episode we talked about this selection of small cap ETFs , kind of like how we would go through and and weed out funds to pick , pick a fund . Let's see what else . Yep , thanks for listening to today's episode .
If you're interested in learning more about Wiser Wealth Management or want to schedule a consultation , meet with one of our financial advisors . You can do so by going to wiser investor . c om or you can click the link in the episode episode notes . All right , thanks guys , and thank you listeners . We'll see you next week .
Thanks for listening to a Wiser Retirement Podcast . We hope you enjoyed today's episode . Make sure to subscribe wherever you're listening . That way you don't miss any new episodes . We'd also appreciate if you could leave a rating and review . If you have any questions about anything that was discussed today head to wiserinvestor . com and reach out .
This episode was produced and edited by Ken Hoadley . This podcast is strictly for informational purposes only and is not to be considered as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial products , securities , digital assets or any other investment vehicles or a basis to make any financial decisions .
Wiser wealth management incorporated , is a registered investment advisor with SEC . The host and or guest may personally own securities , digital assets or other investment vehicles mentioned on this podcast .
Neither the host nor guest of the show are compensated for their participation and no referral fees are paid to or received by any host or guest for Clients , listeners or similar interests . Investments involve risk and , unless otherwise stated , are not guaranteed .
Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial advisor , tax professional , insurance professional and or legal professional before implementing any strategy discussed here , and past performance is not indicative of future performance .
