Broken Trust: When the Peer Review Process Breaks Down - podcast episode cover

Broken Trust: When the Peer Review Process Breaks Down

May 28, 20201 hr 15 minSeason 3Ep. 111
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

With science proving to be an easy target these days for those looking to politicize it, what lasting harm is done to the public discourse and society's faith in anything the research community at large has to report on any subject, in those rare instances when unsubstantiated, misleading, or unethically crafted papers clear a respected journal's peer review process?

Dr. Heather Hill, principle author of the recent rebuttal letter to one such concerning peer-reviewed paper joins researcher Jason Bruck, PhD to discuss the implications for us all.

That Sounds Wild: Red Tailed Hawk.  Frank Buck Zoo

To download the rebuttal/commentary: Distinguishing personal belief from scientific knowledge for the betterment of killer whale welfare – a commentary The International Journal of Comparative Psychology (IJCP)

Animal Care Software

Peppermint Narwhal

Zoo Logic

Zoomility

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Broken Trust: When the Peer Review Process Breaks Down | Zoo Logic podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast