¶ Welcome back to Zone 7 with Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum. Sheryl reminisces about her encounter with retired FBI agent James O. Ponder and his high-profile cases
It was early two thousand and four when I met him for the first time, and I can see him right now sitting in his chair waiting for me. He was all dressed up and ready to talk about our cold case. His eyes were fading, but honey, not his memory. James O. Ponder retired from the FBI in nineteen seventy six, but in his thirty years it was stuff of legendary status. He was one of the ones that tracked down James
o'ray after the assassination of doctor King. He went over to his apartment and he found the maps, so he knew he's headed a Memphis. He had that confirmed. He also worked on the Mary Michael case, the young woman that was put in the box with limited air and buried alive, the Emory University student. He was one of the ones that found her with the straw sticking up.
He also worked the Rosenberg spy case. But the reason I met with him was the Mary Shotwell little case out of Atlanta, and it was the case that he just could not let go. He said, you know, of all the things that I've done, Mary's case is the one that stuck with me. I even exchanged Christmas cards with her mother for forty years. Some cases you just can't let go. Our guest today, Detective Joseph Jackloney, spent
¶ Sheryl introduces Detective Joseph Giacalone to the listeners
twenty years with NYPD. Now, y'all, I've had a lot of people on Zone seven, and there's a lot of people in my Zone seven that have a bio that will just knock your socks off. But I want you to know before I start listing all of his act glades and successes, this is a snapshot of this man. He won the Medal of Valor. He attained the rank of sergeant sergeant over the Detective Squad Bronx Cold Case Squad. He was the commandant officer over the one hundred and
tenth Precinct Detective Squad in Queens. He was the director of the New York Police Department Homicide School. He's a professor, he's an author. He literally wrote the Cold Case Handbook. I not only respect this man, but I tell you he is a decent and fine person. I want to welcome Joseph Jackaloney to his own seven. You know, you and I first met at Crime con and I was knocked out then. Just your way of approaching a case, the way you talk with people the way you work
a room. It's something to what And I often tell young csis and young detectives if you don't know how to talk to people, practice try to learn how to do it. But you do it with such ease.
¶ Det. Joseph underscores the significance of communication skills in investigations, reflecting on his tenure
Well, it's something that I have worked on over my years. Right, we know that communication is a skill that definitely is something that you can work on, and I try to hone that craft throughout my over two decades in the New York City Police Department. I always tell my students specifically, if you are standing online somewhere in the store and all of a sudden, the person behind you is thoughts giving you their life story without asking. You have a gift.
There, Amen, absolutely right, My sisters say to me, sometimes the crazy people just seek you out. I hope so, because it's a gift and it's not something I'm going to take lightly. I love it when people just want to talk to me. So, you have a case that we need to talk about, because, like Agent Ponder, this case sticks with you. This is something you cannot let go. This is something you will not forget about. So why
¶ Question: Can you tell us about Charles Taylor and Stephen Mason?
don't you tell us about Charles Taylor and Steven Mason certainly.
¶ Det. Joseph revisits the haunting Charles Taylor and Stephen Mason case, drawing parallels with past cases
I mean, this is a case we had when I was in the Bronx, and we had actually thousands of open cases, and there is a case that sticks with every investigator no matter what you do, whether it's an homicide or the thack of squad or specifically a cold case squad. But that's where I had found myself in
two thousand, So here's where what we're dealing with. So this case came across my desk and it was like, there are certain things that attract you to something, and for me, it was, first of all, the victim's age. So you had a double homicide, a double stabbing, and you had two young boys, one was six and one was eight, so Charles was six and step brother Stephen was eight. And that was the first thing. Because in New York City we have the accordion file, so to speak.
So you have this big like banker's file or a box, and that's how we do our cases. So it's unlike the LPD who has like the murder book and everything nice and simple. We have a big, giant mess. And the issue that comes down to is that I would say the hardest thing is finding the case. So we came across this case and I saw the ages and right away I said, well, listen to this one is something that we need to look at. Like everything else, you try to find those solvability factors that get in there.
But this case was dated all the way back onto February twenty first, nineteen eighty five, and it happened in two thousand Valentine Avenue, and the boys were both stabbed. They were actually their throats were cut, and they had some other injuries that I won't go into detail on because there's only things that the killer would know. And the issue that comes down to is that this is still an open case. The boys were found at the
bottom of the staircase to the trash compactor room. To me, that was also another significant part of what the killer was probably thinking at the time, you know, using that location, the boys were supposed to be going to school, and they never made to school. Now, the school isn't too far from where the house is located. It's actually just through the apartment complex, make a left turn and it's like another block or two to the school, so they
had a very short distance to walk. The issue that comes down to is that they never make it there. And there was a big search going on for the police all hours of the night until they finally discovered the children at the bottom of the staircase of the trash compact the room. And as you know, Cheryl, when you're dealing with a missing person's case, whether it's an elderly or it's a young child, you always try to do a complete search of the location first because more
than likely that's where you find them. And unfortunately they found them. The hunt was on right. So here's where I also try to teach people who are looking at the cold cases to go back to the archives to find those old newspaper articles and newscasts because they tend to have so much more information than today's reporters. Right, today's reporters there's a twenty two second cycle. They need to get to the next story. Back in the day, the men and women that did this, they did long
form investigations. They were like detectives, and they had so much information that is in their reports and on the newspaper stuff. It's amazing what you can find on it. There's unfortunately only about two articles that are archived, one in the New York Times and one in the New York Post. They actually go into some great details. So they start naming names of suspects, and they start talking
about different things. They name the name of cops and the detectives that are working these things, which is all important for your investigation. But getting back into what we were doing, so for years, for a couple of years, we had one suspect narrowdown. It's unfortunate that most of the evidence in the case was destroyed and we really were left with nothing to go on other than if we brought this person in and question them and then
¶ The hurdles of revisiting decades-old cases are discussed, emphasizing the possible loss of critical evidence
you hope that they make a confession, which is never in a good spot to be. And so we had shows at the time to do that and continue started looking for We went to every police facility that we have that stored evidence in and we couldn't find this. I mean, we're talking about a case that was, you know, twenty twenty years old plus by the time we were
looking into it again. And unfortunately a lot of things happened. Look, the NAPD just had another big fire not too long ago that a bunch of evidence from cold cases were destroyed. So when you're dealing with situation where you have so many cases of the likelihood of this happening is probability, and the issue that what we also look into is that and this is for the people who are out there investigating cases, whether in your law enforcement or you're
a civilian looking at these things. Most of the time the suspect is named somewhere within the case file. It's a phenomenon that you just can't explain. At one point, the detectives had this person on their radar and it was just like everything else that missing that one piece to establish the probable cause in order to make an arrest.
This is something very similar to what we had faced, But we came from the school of looking at cases without reading the files first, right, So if you had an active homicide, you wouldn't go into a filebox and start reading all or booths. They don't exist. So we would do things such as the crime scene walk through
with the photographs. But the other bonus that we had in the Bronx was that during the eighties, the district attorney had a program that they videotaped every crime scene, so this crime scene was actually included, so we were able to actually watch the crime scene in living color
twenty something years later, which was a bonus. And there's something that I've been preaching to police departments and DA squads everywhere I go, that every homicide that happens should be videotapes, especially now when things are so cheap you could do it with an iPhone.
I couldn't agree more. I could not agree more. And I tell you one thing I've been preaching for years. Incorporate drones. Get that overall you can see every possible entrance and exit, and then take that drone and do the a level of where the perpetrator would have walked in or out. It's a tremendous gift that we have now.
Absolutely, It's actually something I have actually included in the new book right about using drones in order to do these crime scenes, specifically outdoor crime scenes, but they're useful for indoor crime scenes. And people say, well, how I mean, you can't be flying this thing in somebody's living room. No, it's about getting it above the ground. Almost look like that Google map view, because this is how you find
extended crime scenes. This is how you find areas where the suspect could have escape from, and you could find all the different things because evidence could be all along that path that the person has fled. I mean, it's as simple.
As that, no question. And let me tell you I've got a detective. He says, if you can use a drone to go into a building to search to keep your officers safe, then you take that same drone and you can go in a crime scene inside the home or building first before you go in and do your walkthrough. It's absolutely one of the best tools we have right now for documenting.
It's something I wish that we had when we were doing this stuff because we had so many cases that could have benefited from this. So I tried to talk to as many people as I can, and that's one of the reasons why I wrote the book to because it gives me a wider search, a wider audience. But unfortunately, police departments are getting away from cold case squads because of the great what I referred to as resignation and retirements, and there's not enough people left to handle these cases
because they all long term investigations. But I tell you, with the two new federal laws that passed last year, they're in trouble if they don't have a cold case squad.
You know, there was a law pass not long ago in Indiana that said a family that had a cold case that felt like their local jurisdiction didn't do enough could give the cold case to the state police. And as soon as I saw that, I thought, this is never going to work. They're going to be inundated, They're not going to be able to turn around in that room,
They're going to have so many requests. So I agree with you that you've got to do it beforehand, and you've got to get ready or before something like that becomes enacted, because I mean, buddy, you're going to be overrun pretty quick. Going back to Charles and Stephen, now
¶ Question: Going back to Charles and Steven. They had a two-year-old younger brother and lived with their mama on Valentine Avenue. Was there anything that stuck out to you from the beginning about the address?
they had a two year old younger brother and lived with their mama on Valentine Avenue. Was there anything that stuck out to you from the beginning about the address or any similar transactions, anything that made you say, hey, wait a minute, I know something about this. You know two thousand Valentine Avenue, or I know something about this general area.
One thing about two thousand Valentine Avenue had had a checkered past, and one of the things as a cold case investigator that you must do is look for companion cases, the cases that could be connected to yours, because they can each hold the piece of the puzzle to the
one that you're investigating. So we did all of that right, so you figure with being you would look at We went through FBI's BYICAP right, the Violent Criminal Apprehension Program, to identify other types of incidents where children were stay up at death and you know, left and kind of you know, staged in the way that they were, and unfortunately it's not it wasn't. It didn't come up with any other hits, so we knew we were dealing with somebody who this might have been their first time dealing
with maybe children at this point. Because in the Bronx back in the eighties and nineties, it was a very violent place and I think we had about eight or nine thousand open homicides just from ten years prior, so there were a lot of cases and you weren't dealing with situations where you had you know, drug on drug crime, drug dealers killing each other, at gang killing each other, or when you had instances of where prostitutes were picked up and found murdered. I mean, you're dealing with two
small children. So this was an outlier from the type of homicides that we were looking at, and that's what really attracted our attention to this.
Yeah, I think it would have gotten much engine two, especially they're not sexually assaulted. There were two at one time, they never left the premise of where they lived. I mean, all of those things are very unusual. And then I believe it was Steven that had some defensive wounds exactly.
We know that he was killed second because he saw his brother as he was coming down the staircase, and then he put up a fight at the bottom of the staircase. But you know as well as I do, anybody who has the high ground, especially if you're an adult against an eight year old, it's going to be rather easy to get control of them. And he fought for his life for at least a minute or so there, and unfortunately he was aim able to get around him
and get out. And the ironic part of this is if he was able to do it, that staircase led directly into the courtyard where somebody would available to hear its screams. For sure.
Now, most of the time, if somebody attacked you with a knife, they hold you in some way, they grab a part of your shirt or something where they're holding you to stab you. Do you think that there's any
¶ Question: Do you think that there's any chance there could be DNA on their clothing?
chance there could be DNA own their clothing.
Well, there's always a chance, right, It's just unfortunately that either it wasn't recovered at the scene and secured well, as I said, a young way to understand the value of that kind of evidence back then, or it was vouchered and we were just neighbor able to locate it. And the case file, like I said, it was old and we had the duplicates of the duplicates on the form. Do you know when you type it, you make four
or five copies. It's not ideal. We had a special place where we would open up these cases because you never know what you were going to find in some of these boxes. I mean, we found boxes with bloody shirts of them. I mean, you name it. Because policing was much different back in the eighties and even the nineties, it was.
Not something that they even understood. To protect the integrity of that scene, there was a lot that had to be taught, and a lot of training and a lot of understanding that you shouldn't walk through blood possible exactly.
I mean, even in some of the videos that we've seen over the years when we were doing the stuff, you'd have detecting smoking cigarettes in the crime scene, you know, stamping them out in and you're just sitting there shaking your head. You're like, my god, as a supervisor, you'd have a stroke. To see what people would you would.
Have a stroke exactly right, Yeah, and again we did. It sounds crazy, but we didn't know. I mean I remember even when I first learned the Lockhart principle in college, I was like, that sounds crazy. I don't take something and leave something. But then you work two or three of these scenes and you realize, oh my lord, that happens, you know, so it is real. And again there's not
enough training. And that's why things like your new book, the Cold Case Handbook, is so imperative, and a lot of the interviews that you do because here's something else I noticed. And maybe it's because you're a professor and you're a teacher at heart, but even as you do interviews on the national news, you're teaching and you're training at a very basic level. I mean, I love the way you talk and the way you form, like, here's
the scene, this is what law enforcement has done. And then you gradually go into and this is what they could do and this is what they should do to me. And I just want to be very very clear. You can't overstate the way you deliver a message.
I do appreciate that, especially coming from you. And what I try to do is when I do a lot of TV stuff, and like you said, I try to explain, I just I don't do the cops speak. I don't do that, you know, this is the detective speak and start meming acronyms that people don't know. I try to explain everything, but I try to also provide people with a solid foundation of where I'm coming from in certain aspects. If it's based on my experience, I'll say based on
my experience. If it's something that is basically, you know, this is what scientific experience or scientific experimentation, now we'll call that out too. I have seen a lot of things lately from other individuals. I won't name anybody, but sometimes when they go on television, I kind of question, like, you know, what are you doing? It's just there's a time and a place for everything, and I try to make sure that you just be real. I call it like it is too. I don't sugarcoat any I tell
people I'm not a bakery. I don't sugarcoat anything. It is what it is. And I kind of speak my mind, which has been probably my doubtful in my lifetime too, because certain people don't want to hear the truth. Well, I always tell people that they don't ask me. But I've had a couple of arguments with people or other experts on TV too, which some of them are kind of fun.
Well, I think from the hill, flat out honest, here it is. You asked me for it. Those are the kind of things to me that are imperative on these cases because if we talk around stuff and we don't flat say, hey, the fact that these children were not sexually assaulted matters. And here's why it matters. The fact that they weren't taken from their home to another location matters. Here's why I can tell you that perpetrator is right there.
We believe this was personal too, and not so much
¶ Det. Joseph shares his commitment to transparency and education shines through as he discusses sharing expertise
about the kids, but you know, against the mother of the kids. It's definitely something that needed to be explored. I mean, like you said, a million things could have happened. It could have been kidnapped, this for ransom, It could have been anything. But this was something shortly where they left the house too, And this wasn't like, you know,
they were coming home from school. Now, this happened on the way to school, within a matter of minutes from them leaving the house, because from when they come out of their apartment. And unfortunately, back in the eighties, we didn't have surveillance videos, So if God forbid, this happened today, it'd be video surveillance of that courtyard like there is today. If you go over the two thousand Valentine Avenue, there's
not only security, there's gates you can't get in. There's all kinds of crazy stuff that happens over there.
From what we know, I mean, they didn't scream, there wasn't anything like that. There obviously wasn't gunfire. There wasn't somebody that busted through there and ran through the courtyard bloody. So again that leads me to think the person is on the inside, the person is right there.
Or somebody that the kids knew, that they were comfortable with, and that security guards knew. So if that person didn't live there, which is a possibility that the guards knew who they worked because they were constantly visiting or coming to the place, we got, hey, how you doing, and then we have to go okay, you know, and then's
walk by. I mean, we know access control is really important, but unfortunately sometimes people get lazy and you see the same person every day they come visit, and then it becomes an automatic like oh, here he comes, and just hit the buzzer and with the person in.
Now, let me ask you something with the five boroughs.
¶ Question: I know you worked Queens and I know you worked The Bronx. When you work a case, no matter what it is, homicide or missing person, did you work differently in those different neighborhoods?
I know you worked Queens and I know you worked the Bronx. When you work a case, no matter what it is, homicide or missing person, do you work different in those different neighborhoods.
No. Yeah, people don't realize New York City's made up of five counties or five boroughs, which we call them. So you have New York County, which is Manhattan, King's County,
¶ The thin spread of NYPD's Bronx Cold Case Squad is discussed, highlighting the necessity of autonomous detectives
which is the Bronx. You have Queens, you have Staten Island which is Richmond County, and you have the Bronx. So I was the CEO of the NYPD's Bronx Cold Case Squad. However, because there was only three supervisors to cover five boroughs, I used to cover Queens and Brooklyn also,
so we were spread pretty thin. But like everything, else you have detectives that you can trust, right, And that's one of the things that if any chief of police out there listens to this podcast and they're looking to put people in this unit, besides their ability to be able to investigate cases, you also have to have the ability of being trustworthy and that they could be left alone for time, for a long time, sometimes without supervision, and they're going to do their job and do their work.
That's an important aspect of picking people to work in a cold case squad is trust. That's critical, yes, trust and so yeah, we had one policy and procedure for everything. So for instance, our definition of a cold case was just no more active leads. It didn't have a time frame on it, so I know a lot of places you know it has to be a year old or
three years old before it could be declared. The nice thing about what we dealt with is we had a good relationship because we all worked at detective squads, so we knew a lot of people, including the supervisors that when we would go look at cases, they would actually throw cases at us and say, here, Joe, take this case because we know who, we know who the purpose I just don't have time, drowning and grand larsities. Just do it, clear it. We don't care who gets the clearance.
That was a good part of it that helped us do well in our job, so to speak, and be able to be recognized from the work we did. But a lot of times it was detectives giving us good cases that they just didn't have the time to work on. Because New York City we have a homicide squad, but they don't work really catch active homicides per se. They're
more of a supplemental group. They will investigate some cold cases or other things out there, but it's not like La right where there's a homicide and the homicide squad does everything. We run it by each detective squad, and we have seventy seven precincts, so we have seventy seven different detective squads, but everyone works and does the same thing.
Well, see, I just didn't know, if you know, the different neighborhoods had like a different vibe, a different rhythm. They just the way you approach was different. Well that's
¶ The challenges of working in various neighborhoods are explored, focusing on police-community dynamics
what I was asking, Like, in other words, this neighborhood, you might could do a you know, neighborhood canvas pretty quick whereas over here they're not going to respond to a canvas. You're wasting your time. If there was another way to kind of do it, That's what I was. You know, the.
Bronx in Brooklyn are a tough neighborhoods to work in. It you're the police. Generally the two most violent have the two most violent precincts in there. So I've had the pleasure or unfortunate pleasure. However, you want to look at it as working and working as cops as a supervisor in both boroughs too, doing patrol work. It's interesting because you have different cultures and people too, so and
each each town has its own thing. So when I worked in Brownsville, their model was never run never will you know, bedsty do or die. I mean that's the kind of stuff that you're dealing with. Yeah, that's the kind of Yeah, the mentality that you're dealing with too. And things have gotten probably i'd say worse over the last couple of years because of all of the mass eatier about the cops so how bad they are and
everything else. So I'm imagining that it's even tougher today than dealing with it than I was going back in that timeframe.
We have seen in Atlanta some neighborhoods that have transitioned completely. They don't look the same, they don't have the same people, they don't have the same religion, they don't have the same background. It's nuts. So again, the way you approach now is completely different. You have to know who is in your town, who's in your zone, who's in your jail, and you know who's on your beat, so that you know how to approach, how to talk. It shouldn't matter
if you're in Chinatown or Wall Street. You should be able to maneuver and get people to talk to you, and even.
People who are hostile to you as the police. But you know, you pull up in certain neighborhoods, everyone and in the building knows you're there before you even get into the door. So you know, they see they see you pull up in a black Chevy and Pola. Right, they know you're not the full of brushman. They know you're not selling vacuums. You know, you step out of the car and everyone knows that the cops are here. Right,
you'll hear the whistles and the thing. You know, all kinds of crazy stuff that's going on and it's a certain point you're like, listen, I'm not here for any of that stuff. I don't care. This is what we're here for, you know. And a lot of times, as you know, right, I mean, how you approach people. I don't care if they are gang members, they're drug dealers.
Everybody has information that they can help you with. Yeah, some don't want to Some don't want to talk to you in public, and that's why you have a business card. And that's why on the back of those business cards you should have the crime Stoppers information, so that anonymous tip line. So that's somebody who is verbally in the street saying get away from me, I don't want to talk to you, get out of here, blah blah, and
you hand them a card and they take it. Right after all that whole big show, then you know exactly what it was all about. Sure, So it's an important aspect of it. And you have to it's like being a comedian and you have to work the room sometimes and you have to know your audience. And like you said, going.
¶ Question: Going back to these two little boys, Charlie and Steven, what is it about their case that still pulls you, still draws you?
Back to these two little boys, Charlie and Steven, what is it about their case that still pulls you? Still draws you.
I've seen a lot of bad crime scenes and to see children are always tough. So when you're watching these videos, you're also you know, then you're taking these things into the memory. So I've been now retired twelve years, and i still have reoccurrences of those videos coming up in my head. Now. I'm talking about seeing lots of live crime scenes and then you know, dealing with nine to eleven aspects after the fact and you know, doing the forensic side of that and sifting through all that stuff.
This is what I still remember. And you know, people would say, well, it's a case that you can't solve and you just need to let it go, and no, you just can't let these things go. So you still try to, you know, encourage those that are in charge now to keep on, you know, with the fight because we have a strong indication, we have a name, We pretty much feel that this is the person, but we don't have enough evidence to establish powerble cause it's as
simple as that. And unfortunately that happens an awful lot in these cases.
And you know a lot of times somebody will ask me, why are you going to highlight a case where you know it's never going to be solved or you can't do anything else about it. Here's why listening to you talk and telling people the importance of videotaping, people are going to hear you, and then somebody's going to go, yeah, why aren't we doing that? And then now everything is changed going forward. So you basically have Charlie and Steven that are going to transform an apartment in the way
they do business. And if they solve ten percent fifteen percent more cases, if they have better video or flat have video to show a jury, you're going to have better conviction rates because you're given the jury more So, what you're doing maybe is not solving their case, but because of them and through them, solving hundreds more that would not have been.
And there also could be about making sure that you secure your evidence properly. In the old cases, make sure you identify where they are and toured properly. I mean, I couldn't tell you how many times that we found things with DNA on it back from the eighties and nineties that were secured and plastic and then the whole DNA sample was ruined until we realized that you know,
years later that yet put everything in paper. So like you said yes, every time you every time you talk about something or you know, you learn from it and you can improve things. And also in a case like this, if you're saying, yeah, why are you still bothering whether you're never going to find it, well, because there are things that can happen, right, Sometimes somebody can get religion, or somebody's on their deathbed and they want to now you know, talk about it, and there are things that
can happen. Maybe this individual or individuals told somebody and or confided in somebody and now you know what, somebody down the road gets arrested and now they want to get out of jail free card. And that's just for this case. This is for any cold case. You know, Hope.
¶ "Hope is not a plan, but sometimes when you're dealing with cold cases, it's all you have. And you just have to just keep on hammering away, and like everything else, the harder you work, the luckier you get. Hope is not a plan, but sometimes it's all you get." -Detective Joseph Giacalone
I always say hope is not a plan, but sometimes when you're dealing with cold cases, it's all you have and you just have to just keep on hammer and away and like everything else, the harder you work, the luckier you get.
Hope is not a plan, but sometimes it's all you get that is fantastic, and you're you couldn't be more correct.
You know.
I got to tell you something funny, Sergeant. When I was a little girl, I told my Mama that I was gonna marry an Italian man. And she said that's
¶ Sheryl recalls her childhood dream of marrying an Italian detective
a good choice, you know, you know, and she goes why, and I said, because detectives are Italian. So I wanted that last name. So to me, where I got that from, of course, was like TV and movies, Like all of these New York City detectives, they all had those names, right, and so I wanted that last name, which my maiden name was not Italian, so I thought I got to go get that through marriage. And then I was sound, you know, like a detective. And of course I'm married
a scontsman. But it's okay. But every time I hear like you and other NYPD homicide detectives specifically speak, that childhood understanding comes back. But I will tell you sometimes I hear people say arguably or perhaps well, I will flat tell you that New York City homicide detectives are
the best in the world. You spending any time with us today is a gift, and I just want you to tell us any last thing you want us to know, or tell us about y'all's training or your homicide school, anything you want us to know, to really showcase just what y'all are about because it's more than nine to eleven, and it's more than this brotherhood, and it's more than this training. This is not something new. I think it's always been this way for NYPD.
Well, we have, unfortunately, a lot of experience in this kind of area, especially going back in the seventies and eighties and nineties, and we had life I first got into the detective squad, there were detectives there that had forty years worth of experience. On top of that, we're talking about men and women that were you know, hardcore sixties, seventies, eighties, through the riots and all the other things that were happening in New York City, and they were able to
pass on that experience. And then over time where we see people retiring just after twenty years and then you know, the resignations are up now because all the stuff that's happening, you lose that experience. So the only thing that you can help replace that is with training. So we spent a lot of time developing courses and getting them accredited
for people too, so that they can go to these classes. Specifically, we have the Death Investigations Course, we have a Criminal Investigations course, that every detective who gets promoted has to go through it. And it's about trying to learn how to solve the toughest cases. And I would say dealing with cold cases is not only the toughest cases, but they are America's toughest cases. They're open for a reason. If it was that easy, they would have been closed already.
So it's they needed to visuals who will not get deterred by anything. No matter what obstacle you put in front of them, they are going to try to, you know, go over it, go under it, or go around it. And it's that's the bottom line about how you do it. So it's about tenacity, it's about persistence. And New York has that has the reputation of being, you know, the dog eat dog world, and I think that has a lot to do with that.
Sergeant, thank you so much for not just coming on to Zone seven, but being a part of mine and reminded us the importance of talking about Stephen and Charlton y'all. I'm going to end Zone seven the way that I always do with a quote. It's important for these unspeakable
¶ "It's important for these unspeakable things to be spoken up because they actually happened in this world." -J.W
things to be spoken of because they actually happened in this World John Walsh. I'm Cheryl McCollum and this is Zone seven
Non
