Hamlet by William Shakespeare

Hey everybody, Jeff here. A couple quick things before we get into the episode for the day. First of all, a lot of new people are finding the show. That's so exciting. Welcome and thank you for listening. Really appreciate you. Listening along with us, reading along with us. Follow up to that. To keep the momentum going, we've concocted a little challenge here. We were going to take a couple weeks off. No new episodes over the Christmas time. Holiday.

But if we get to 150 ratings on Apple Podcasts, we're going to do a bonus episode. Record it before then, but we'll drop it over the Christmas break for your holiday listening pleasure. Go to Apple Podcasts. Leave a rating. Five stars. And once we get to 150, we'll let you know that we made it there. But thanks so much for listening. Really excited. We're having a great time. I hope you can tell that. And without further ado, let's get into the show.

Tito's Handmade Vodka is America's favorite vodka for a reason. From the first legal distillery in Texas, Tito's is six times distilled till it's just right and naturally gluten-free, making it a high-quality spirit that mixes with just about anything. From the smoothest martinis to the best Bloody Marys, Tito's is known for giving back, teaming up with nonprofits to serve its communities and do good for dogs. Make your next cocktail with Tito's.

Distilled and bottled by Fifth Generation, Inc., Austin, Texas. 40% alcohol by volume. Savor responsibly. Welcome to Zero to Well Read. a podcast about everything you need to know about the books you wish you'd read. I'm Jeff O'Neill. And I'm Rebecca Shinsky. Jeff, to pod or not to pod? That is no question today as we turn to Hamlet by one.

William Shakespeare. Madness and great ones must not unwatched go. And we do not know how to handle this. So it's driving us a little bit crazy because it feels like trying to eat an elephant. When I used to teach this, I would take two, three hour... set you know class periods and that was still not enough so we're going to do the best we can to an introduction an appreciation of an investigation of

hamlet by one william shakespeare it's especially daunting we were talking about this yesterday rebecca it's like in things we've recorded before this i'm not actually sure where this is happening in the release schedule but we've done what seven or eight of these at this point For each one of them, you feel a responsibility to get it right. Yes. For sure. For this one, I'm feeling something else. I'm feeling like...

Unequal to the task. We're not worthy. The little Wayne's world here. This is where I am with this. I don't know if I feel we're not worthy so much as that it is an impossible. You can't sum up Shakespeare in one podcast episode. You can't really do any of the individual plays. full justice, but we're trying to find that marriage of cocktail party and English class. And I think through the lens of that vibe.

we have arrived at a layout for this episode that will satisfy both sides. It will give people who have not read Hamlet or who have no desire, who haven't been there in a while, Some hooks to hold on to. And if you're a nerd and you're looking for an excuse to go back and read some Shakespeare.

This will give you, I think, the encouragement that you're looking for some some hooks for that as well. But it is we talked about it a little bit yesterday. We've been sort of chit chatting about it all week. Your partner, Michelle, sent me a lovely video of you reading sections out loud. your kids like we usually try to come into these episodes pretty cold and having not really spoken to each other about whatever the topic is but this one has leaked its way all

around. And I think it's part it's just because this is such a huge topic. It's such an important book. Shakespeare is the goat. Hamlet is the equivocal best and most important of the Shakespeare plays. It's a huge task, but I think that we're going to find our way into a fun approach for it today. And say you want to pick up a copy of Hamlet for yourself, go check out thriftbooks.com where you can find 19 million.

books, movies, CDs, and games. There are dozens, hundreds of Shakespeare editions you could get. You can find my beloved Riverside Shakespeare. edited by David Bevington used. It's a big old textbook. It's going to cost you, you know, 30, 40 bucks. Find it there. You can find a mass market paperback classics with a concordance with notes and summaries.

For four or five bucks, if you want something you can throw in your bag and really mark up and not feel too weird about messing up a little bit, you can find Critical Editions, Collector's Edition. You can go get Maggie O'Farrell's Hamnet if you want to do a little secondary reading in anticipation of the movie coming.

out thanks to thriftbooks.com for sponsoring season one of zero to well read i think that that feeling of being overwhelmed is not the worst way to approach it because it shakespeare and hamlet are both overwhelming, especially for a modern reader. We stand at remove here of some five centuries, right, of language, of understanding of thought.

And it feels overwhelming to try to understand it. Even I, who have read this many times, have tried to teach it. I'm no expert, I should say. I'm not a Shakespeare scholar. But I'm an appreciator, and I've had some...

experience wrestling with the text and wrestling with the plays and ideas but even just getting through one of the great soliloquies here It feels like there's so much muchness, to quote a different book, that it's like – and so maybe that's the first thing to acknowledge for anyone who –

approaching Shakespeare at all even if you have some experience just to sort of get that on the table that that is part of the experience like it's so the weight of history the weight of the art the weight of the craft the weight of the ideas are so overwhelming.

And that's part of the pleasure, maybe. Maybe that's the thing to say. I think that's part of the pleasure and also the fact that the language is so old. So many of the words are not words that we are familiar with. The iamic pentameter means that he... putting words out of the order that they would normally follow each other in sentences just to get the rhythm right. And that is disorienting in its own way. I think the way to go into Shakespeare for everyone who's not a Shakespeare scholar.

is Let It Wash Over You. And that it's about the vibe. It's about the ideas of the play. I was thinking if we had teleported Shakespeare into 2025 and taken him to see modern drama, how much of, you know, all those ideas and concepts and the... the specific language that we use today he wouldn't understand and that

gave me some permission to like, I don't need to look up every word that I don't understand here because you can get the context. And when you go to see a play, that's the experience of like watching the people interact. understanding the character's motivations, and that these are plays, that Hamlet is a play, is a really important part of this. This was not written to be read. It was written to be experienced. And I'll say right from the top, one of my tips, I...

read through it once and then I went back and reread it listening along with a full cast audio production. It's an unbelievable idea. When you told me that yesterday, it never occurred to me to do an audiobook of this. We're going to get to this down the way, but one of the questions we routinely ask or have been asking the last few is, does an adaptation give you the gist of this? And this is an unalloyed yes, right? Like if you get it, there is no, well...

Now, this is the other thing that happens. You're going to Weezer and you want to destroy the sweater of this podcast episode. We're going to pull one thread and it's going to come all the way apart. But like there is no Hamlet, right? There is no agreed upon. This is the real thing. The thing most people get is...

all of the hamlets that have ever been attributed to Shakespeare in the form of this four hour long play that almost certainly was never performed like that. Like really keeping to two hours, even, I think, I don't think it's mentioned here. Maybe it's Romeo and Juliet, but like Shakespeare even mentioned.

that you get two hours on the boards. Like the plays are supposed to be kept to two hours. So the version we're talking about is twice as long as anything that got produced in Shakespeare's lifetime. So any decent version of it... is as likely as any other decent version of it to capture the thing.

And you can never capture it, but you're right. Talk about that audiobook experience a little bit more. What did that do for you and where can people go find it? I have to give credit to this to my high school English teacher, my freshman year, Joe Hunsley. He is no longer with us. He was an incredible teacher. And we read much more. to do about nothing. And I think he correctly assumed that high school freshmen would be overwhelmed if you just handed them the Dover paperback.

of a Shakespeare play and said, go with God. So we broke it up reading in class and he was using audio like cassette tapes that he must have had for 40 years at that point. But we listened to a full performance of it. And he would stop it along the way and we would dissect sentences with a like, what was that scene about? What's going on here? But that really imprinted on me. Like that was before I had seen Shakespeare performed. It was before I had seen Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet adapt.

which is my other like you know sort of signal experience right with Shakespeare and it was a powerful and very helpful way because you can hear the cadence you can hear the tone though The actors have done the interpretive work of what emotion should this word or this phrase convey that we can't. get very easily because so much of the language is unfamiliar and I had kind of forgotten that that was my experience but then I was

I had ordered a new copy. It's a Folger Shakespeare Library edition of Hamlet. It has a ton of notes in it. And I was just cruising around like, I wonder if there is an audio book of this. And the audio edition of this same adaptation is free. for spotify premium users and it's three and a half hours long and i was like bingo bingo that'll do it and

We're going to get into as much of the history as we think we can manage and that may be useful to make, you know, 60 to 75 minutes of enjoyable podcast content. But it's helpful to remember that Shakespeare was an actor as well. And in this particular play, again, none of this is anywhere like canonical, but it's generally thought he played the player king and the ghost, which is, you know, kind of one of the reasons Maggie O'Farrell gets...

excited about Hamlet as playing Hamlet's father and all this stuff that goes into it. But it's meant to be performed, right? And Shakespeare himself was writing for him and Lord Chamberlain's men to perform these things.

the way it's staged, and even the way we get the documents that we understand to be Shakespeare, largely are taken... Like, he didn't sit down and print a version of this. Like, you know what? I need to get this down on paper. It's taken from sides and various pieces in production. For...

For this to be, and when we get to the score, this will probably get as high of a score as you're ever going to get. To be this, this is secular scripture when it comes to the Western intellectual tradition. Outside of the Bible. This is the first and greatest secular scripture in the Western canon because even Homer was, you know, even at the time was sort of religious, right? It's about the gods and it goes into myth. This is something created out of whole cloth.

But the fuzziness around the play's origin and then Shakespeare himself, which I'm less interested in because I don't know there's much water there, but that's the thing that happens. It's amazing, Rebecca. That we don't even know what Hamlet is and there's this idea of this er Hamlet that Shakespeare wrote before this version which he likes

The idea that he was so drawn to this that he did a whole other version. It's wild. It's just so wild to think that this is a fuzzy business for being a monument. This is a monument made of dreams and ghosts. And I think that the biblical comparison... is useful there because that is how most of us are taught to think about the bible you know in modern protestantism in contemporary even the bible as a piece of contemporary

literature to be understood, insofar as it inspires a lot of references in books over the last several centuries, that there is not one canonical version that these are stories that were passed down and written and retranscribed and then told orally to other people who transcribed them in their own language. And then through the centuries, it was updated into more modern English. We go from King

James to like all these different new editions of the Bible for people with the intention of making it more legible to them. And I think You can think of Shakespeare in those ways as well, that there are the versions that he wrote, but then there are transcriptions of so many different performances of the plays. And that's on the page in this Folger Library edition as well. I did not spend time parsing.

things but they use different symbols around words and phrases to indicate like this is a phrase that appears in one of the other versions but not all of them this is a phrase that appears in two of these this is from the first folio and so there's opportunity if you really want to nerd out you can but if nothing else the text is useful for reminding yourself that there is not one solid version there are some quotes that you know have

pretty much endured at least in our modern readings of them but it's helpful it's especially again as you were saying at the top to remember like that audio production i listened to was about three and a half hours long a person who was going to see this performed the globe would see about a two-hour performance so a lot of the words get cut and they're pulling it down to conveying the essence of the idea and

I think then that gives us some latitude. That combined with... It's funny that we're recording Pynchon and Shakespeare back-to-back because one thing they share in common is our lack of access to the authorial intent or any sort of... additional commentary by the author on their own work, because Shakespeare, if he ever did it, it doesn't exist. That was not the modus operandi of the time. So we do not...

All we have is the text, but oh, what a text it is, and oh, how much of it there is. And any of the books we're going to talk about, and this isn't really a book. This is a play, I guess. This is our first foray into a non-novel, bare, repeated work. Hamlet is the first one that we've read that is sort of the work of a life. You could spend a lifetime wrestling with it and come back to it over and over again. And some of it is because of, then you can get...

more granular and specific in the history of the text and the language and do the entomological or philological work of understanding what this word is that you don't understand or what it comes from. There are still mysteries to unfold. Like, you know, there's a reference to some story about an ape that's just sort of dashed off as if everyone understands what the reference is. And in my, I used the David Bevington edited version that came out in 1990.

The note there is this is some lost anecdote. We have no idea what this is. Even these are elusive, right? These things that we feel like have been so well-trod that... there are still hidden corners to be considered or understood. And that was certainly true in my two back-to-back readings of this over the last week, that there were things that I gleaned just reading it on my own and trying to consider. struck this play.

in my head, and then things that landed completely differently when I heard it performed, and other things that landed when I heard it performed that I hadn't picked up on at all just in reading it myself. So I think multiple encounters with Shakespeare is the way to go. have not read Hamlet and you're going to go on your first adventure with him listening to this podcast just know you're

Part of the deal is that you won't get everything. Neither of us gets everything. I'm pretty comfortable saying nobody living today gets everything. We're all in the same boat. This is something I've always wondered, and there's no way to know this, but like... If you were a groundling, sort of, you know, the regular person paying a penny to go see Hamlet at the Globe in 1600 or 1601.

Were you like, yeah, I get all of this. No one knows. Also, it wasn't super highfalutin at the time. Yeah, I think there's some... It certainly wasn't... It certainly wasn't opera like that in that particular. It was meant to be a popular entertainment.

I still wonder how much went over the heads of, I mean, literally and figuratively over the heads of the ground. We know there's no way to know. Shakespeare is clearly very well read for his time. There are biblical allusions. There are references to the Odyssey, references to the Aeneid. to all kinds of classical texts. I'm sure there are references that I did not pick up in mine and that he was more educated and had a pretty conventional and successful career and life where

Not everybody at the time had access to that kind of information and or education. And so going to see a play like this.

It works on two levels. There is this messy family drama that's at the heart of it, and then there are all of the references and allusions in the language that are layered on. If you get them... that adds to the richness but i think you could have a good time just going to see this as a revenge story yes and that's and we'll get to why this is important which is one of the most hilarious things i've ever had to tackle is why shakespeare hamlet's important um but i think it is worth

thinking through some of the specificity here. And one thing that Shakespeare does is takes sturdy, well-known, familiar genres, even stories, and then does Shakespeare stuff to it, right? Because at its heart...

This is a compelling setup, which you're going to do a quick synopsis of in a minute. Romeo and Juliet is a compelling setup. Taming of the Shrew, a compelling setup. Julius Caesar, of course, Richard III, Henry IV, Henry V, like he's taking... sturdy narrative structures familiar containers and then decides to blow it away with language

you know and i say here the greatest wielder of the english language ever to do it but it's not he's not doing that and creating the stories from whole cloth at the same time i think that's something that's interesting to know because He is very much a practical person trying to make his living doing this. And at some level, he needs to provide the sword play and love story and moments of catharsis that. a audience once.

But then he's going to throw in seven soliloquies for Hamlet, you know, just like that have no, that's so unnecessarily beautiful in a revenge play. So unnecessarily complicated and deep and groundbreaking. But that's where his creativity really flourishes. And he does amazing things to put his characters in a position to be complicated and be conflicted. But from a story level, these are crowd pleasers. They just are.

and that really holds up here so with that all of you said what is the plot of hamlet prince of denmark okay so the king of denmark has been dead for a couple of months like body is barely cold in the ground his son hamlet the prince of denmark is furious that his mother gertrude has already gotten married again And he has married his dead father's brother, Claudius. So the ghost of the dead king appears to two of Hamlet's friends. It won't talk to them, though, but they summon Hamlet.

And the ghost reveals to Hamlet that he was murdered by Claudius, who poured poison in his ear. Hamlet vows to avenge his father's death. It does not go well. Along the way, Hamlet accidentally attacks somebody else. There's a sword fight where the tips of the swords are poisoned, but the swords get switched during the fight. Kind of a princess bride feeling moment.

Both Hamlet and the person he's dueling with end up poisoned. There's a cup of poison that the wrong person drinks. And by the end, everyone is dead. Hamlet's girlfriend, Ophelia, commits suicide because Hamlet is driven mad by grief. But one of the people he has accidentally killed is...

her father so she's also driven mad by grief and by having been abandoned by her lover there is a lot going on here the body count It starts at one with the dead king in the ground and then seven more people die along the way. Is it seven? So Claudius, Gertrude, Laertes, Polonius, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern. I guess those are the seven, right? Oh, well, yeah, yeah, and Hamlet.

Oh, and Hamlet. I forgot that Hamlet. Let angels sing thee to the rest, sweet prince. Okay, so a couple things I want to say just about this. This idea, there was this story, the tragedy of Amleth, that was kicking around. Also, Thomas Kidd's The Spanish Tragedy was probably the pinnacle of the more formulaic version of this. What to say about the fact that...

Shakespeare's son's name is Hamnet. As far as I can tell, there is no direct correlation. Everything that we know is that this is maybe a more common name than we think. it's just one of those things however it's also there so it just is and i think one of the great pleasures of shakespeare one of the great pleasures of having a canon there are many downsides but then you can refer to canons and you can play with it like

Maggie O'Farrell does in Hamlet, or as Stephen Coogan does in Hamlet 2, or that Tom Stoppard does in Shakespeare in Love, or something like this. But in terms of what we actually know, we don't know much. We just don't know much. It's a... It's a fertile mystery what the relationship is. That's all I've got to say about this at this point. There's really not much else to say. And all we can glean from Maggie O'Farrell's Hamnet.

is just based on timelines lining up that around the time that hamlet goes into production is at is Within a few years of Hamlet, not Hamlet, of Shakespeare's son Hamnet dying during the plague. And so we know that Hamnet died. while Shakespeare or that becomes the background it's happening while Shakespeare is writing this play he's clearly this is a fathers and sons man play on so many levels

That's happening. But we only really know that because timelines line up what what more is happening in Shakespeare's life or what more is going on in culture at the time that informed this is a mystery. And I think you could. drive yourself nuts trying to ground that or you can just let it be part of it doesn't really matter the work is so good on its own

Another strategy for understanding Shakespeare, dealing with Shakespeare, is something that John Keats wrote about Shakespeare himself, which is this idea of negative capability. He said, Shakespeare's great genius was negative capability, which is the ability to hold more than one.

conflicting idea in your head at one time and not go crazy so let it let them exist as possibility fields to be explored and you know you don't have to choose a truth or what you think happened because it can't be known so you get this really evocative and generative suspension of certainty.

which is a lot of fun if you can allow yourself to have fun with it. Suspension of certainty that is fun for Hamlet is not the way he interacts with the world, but ergo the problem there is your father's death. I want to linger here on something that when I was reading it to Rowan the other day, I was struck by is how compelling the opening is. You know, we get these foot soldiers on the wall and they're...

They see a ghost, and it's come back multiple times. And they're trying to decide, should we tell Hamlet about it? It won't speak to us. Shall we tell the prince who's back? It looks like his dad. We should probably mention this, right?

And then Hamlet's own interrogation of it. That's a very sort of, it feels very modern to have a hook. This is a plot. What is this ghost? This is a ghost story. Yeah, what does the ghost want? What does the ghost want? And I was listening to a podcast I like recently sort of bemoan a...

modern, algorithmically driven tactic, which is to have a murder in the first five minutes and then a flashback, right? And I was like, even 600 years ago, we were trying to figure out how to hook people's attention at the beginning.

right and this is a way to do that and then what you come back is hamilton has all this knowledge and his his journey is one of consciousness and understanding because he knows pretty quickly that claudius did what he was afraid he was going to do and so the drama of the plot one of the great interventions here is the drama of the plot is not what is ham how is hamlet going to get revenge is how does hamlet deal with the truth of what has happened

And his investigation is a moral and one of conscience that it is a sort of fact. Because it's actually very simple, right? There's a very simple morality here. It's like Claudius killed his dad. He should be killed. But Shakespeare's like, that's too simple. That's too easy here. Let's see. So do we want to do, let's do Shakespeare stuff. Who wrote it? Let's do what we can say about Shakespeare.

I think it is interesting to think about who Shakespeare was through the reality, which is people think he didn't exist. I think that's an interesting way of understanding what we're dealing with here in a couple of different. You know, you've made it when a conspiracy theory exists about whether you were real or not. Yes. Yeah. There's sort of the anti-Stratfordians would say someone.

These are a group of people that really go back. You know, Mark Twain was one of these people, weirdly. Mark Twain was inventing typewriters and believing Shakespeare didn't exist. What a odd guy. Like, this is not...

This is not a fringe theory so much as it is a persistent and strange one. And it comes out of really two veins, is the best of my understanding. I'm not an expert in the anti-Stratfordian, so I'm sort of paraphrasing what I've understood and what I've looked up a little bit over the last couple weeks.

This episode is brought to you by Marshalls, where you never have to compromise between quality and price. The buyers of Marshalls hustle hard, working to bring you great deals on brand name and designer pieces. Because Marshall's believes everyone deserves access to the good stuff. Visit a Marshall's store near you or shop online at marshalls.com.

When did making plans get this complicated? It's time to streamline with WhatsApp, the secure messaging app that brings the whole group together. Use polls to settle dinner plans. Send event invites and pin messages so no one forgets mom's 60th. And never miss a meme or milestone. All protected with end-to-end encryption. It's time for WhatsApp. Message privately with everyone. Learn more at whatsapp.com.

This episode is brought to you by Indeed. When your computer breaks, you don't wait for it to magically start working again. You fix the problem. So why wait to hire the people your company desperately needs? Use Indeed's sponsored jobs to hire top talent fast. And even better, you only pay for results. There's no need to wait. Speed up your hiring with a $75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.

terms and conditions apply. Two things. One is a paucity of direct Shakespeare. I wrote this stuff. We just don't have it. We just don't have it. And the second is, and I think this is more interesting. a fundamental disbelief that these things exist, that these plays exist, that Shakespeare could be this good as he was. Right, Rebecca? Like that's kind of the two veins this comes out of. I think that's it. Those are the two that are going on. And then there was an interesting note.

the intro to the Folger edition that I read that was like, also Shakespeare seemed to be a pretty conventional. And the language of these plays is unruly and creative and artistic. And maybe people have a hard time with that guy. Like, really? That guy could do this? Yeah. And Stoppard builds a little bit of that into the invention of... Sorry, I'm getting confused. That's a different Stoppard play. Shakespeare in Love. But I think people with their heads screwed on mostly write...

say, yeah, Shakespeare wrote it, and he was just really good. I think that's the Occam's razor, right, Rebecca? I agree. He just was that guy. One of the ironies is a lot of the people that argue against... The anti-Stratfordians think that it needed to be someone more well-educated like Francis Bacon or somebody because Shakespeare couldn't have been that smart.

What's funny is in Ben Johnson's inscription for the first folio, he kind of makes fun of Shakespeare for not being that educated. He has a little Latin and less Greek because he doesn't make Greek references. He doesn't make very little where a more traditionally...

highly educated playwright would have a lot more Greek shit in it. Shakespeare just doesn't. So right at the beginning, people, his contemporaries are saying, it's amazing he's doing all this stuff, even though he's unlearned it, unlettered. If you try to think about the books today that ring... both bells that do really well commercially that's a that's a really interesting that people that people like that they engage with that they have fun with the books that sell and that get

critical and commercial acclaim. Those exist in a sweet spot that is not... super highbrow. It's not dropping references to the most difficult classical texts you've ever read. It's not the author on every page reminding everyone how educated they are. Those books exist and they serve their own purposes, but...

Like Shakespeare lives in that sweet spot. And my impression of how the plays landed at the time that they were new is that they landed in that sweet spot as well, that you could be an educated person who was pretty literary and pick up a lot of these references.

is making like he's dropping stuff from the Aeneid and you can enjoy that but if you're somebody who like I just want a good story you're also going to get that from Hamlet and that to me is a further piece of evidence that this This could have been a pretty normal guy who had an extraordinary mind and a very creative way with language and was able to do something nobody else had done.

The idea that these plays would have needed to be produced by someone coming down from the ivory tower doesn't work for me. Folks coming down from the ivory tower cannot reach the common reader very successfully. I'm also going to do a very poor job of summarizing multiple centuries of evolution here in the next 60 seconds, but I'm going to give it a go, which is that one of the other things we wrestle with as a modern reader of Shakespeare is that Shakespeare is Shakespeare.

Shakespeare seems amazing is because we've been taught that things like Shakespeare are amazing because Shakespeare is essential to the canon. Like there's a self-reinforcing thing that's happened over the decades and centuries. From the jump, Shakespeare was very well regarded, even by his peers. But to the point where he's become this sort of secular saint of Western art, you know, number one draft pick for writers of the English language, was not...

obvious from the beginning. He's fallen more or less out of favor at various points. And there was a point, especially after he died for, I don't remember now, but some period of time where he needed to be taken up and reclaimed. And some of what's going on... is contingent historical strangeness but some of it is also this which is at this particular moment we're in we're in sort of the the renaissance right we're in elizabethan england coming out of

one intellectual period to another and the period that would follow shakespeare especially would be increasingly towards humanist thought increasingly towards the enlightenment the great awakening and other things like this where thinkers In the academy and the arts, we're especially interested in non-Christian based art and reference points. Who can we look to? Like, where do we look to?

and shakespeare emerges at a very interesting time in the history of england in the history of the west and i should say here that thing we say here are my understanding of western literature specifically and english literature even more specifically still all those caveats still apply is it was an interesting time in which art could for a long time theater wasn't allowed in england which is very strange and then as it was becoming allowed it was these

even not evangelical ecclesiastical plays they were christian plays like representation of stuff from the bible that turned into these big guild festivals that then turned into representations of classical antiquity and then turned into well we can tell different kinds of stories here at the same time. Elizabeth herself was an interesting person, but our philosophical moment, science is starting to become a thing, Rebecca. The world is not just God said so.

Or maybe it isn't. And any epistemological change is a very, kind of like when the river goes into the ocean. Where those things mix, you get a lot of generative stuff happening. And Shakespeare is in a time when a secular theater is possible and an intellectual tradition of maybe there's more to human life than just the Bible is possible.

And Hamlet, I think, is in a lot of ways... at the spear that is the tip of the spear of this kind of thinking at this moment education and public access to reading material are really shifting here as well like a couple hundred years after gutenberg we're getting the discovery of a lot of classical texts or the read

of classical texts that are being printed and distributed for the first time in a very long time or printed for the first time distributed in a new way among folks and access to those stories and to have a like oh We have not the realization that we have not always understood life through the lens of Christian philosophy and ideology, that there were the Greek and Roman myths, that there are stories that are much older than that. And Shakespeare seems interested in all of those.

as well and in the common threads of humanity and very human problems and behaviors that people have been doing for from the beginning of time So why is Shakespeare so great? Some of it is because we say Shakespeare is great, and there's no way to quantify that, but I wanted to get that into the air. That's one of the things that happens, right? Because so much literary tradition since has edified...

Shakespeare we come to it and we sort of get it like this feels great because that's we told stuff like this is great but to be a little bit more specific this is my experience of teaching also my experience of reading as well I'll say personally is if you teach texts from classical antiquity they are quite good but the characters do not feel modern right achilles feels like a character you know you go read dante or the great roman works

They feel like interesting characters, but they don't feel recognizables as people. And here's one thing that Hamlet is a great example of for Shakespeare is that these tend to feel recognizable as characters. They have flaws. They have desires. They're not formulaic. They have inner lives. They don't, many of them, some of them do, but many of them don't map neatly onto archetypes. They may be playing with them, but they tend to feel more real.

in that particular way and what emotionally real ophelia is a great example of this and like really the only female character that gets notable stage time notable screen time but it's uh like This is the 1600s and she's an unmarried woman. So she has to be concerned about like courting the right guy, but also protecting her purity and her reputation. And Hamlet has made some promises to her. You get the sense that maybe there have been a few.

And that she went into that space with him because he has made some promises to her. And now her boyfriend has gone nuts because he's found out that his father has been killed and he's pushing her away. And she's like, but we had a deal here, dude. And then he accidentally kills her dad. So she's in grief as well. She's lost her father and she's lost her boyfriend. And in 1623, men were the way that women got access to power. So she sees.

no hope for herself and she goes and drowns herself in the river and there is nothing more human and more like believable and relatable to like think about that as a dramatic teenage relationship Like, Hamlet is 30. I'm going to assume Ophelia is around the same age. We're not told how old she is. So these are... young adults, like early young adults. But this maps on to like teenage melodrama and the kinds of romance.

stories that we've been telling for as long as we've been telling stories of you made me promises and why are you ignoring me and don't you love me anymore and get yourself away from me i'm too like i'm i'm too much now i'm in too much pain i can't deal with you you should get thee to another And.

To connect a couple of the threads, too, Hamlet is not sitting around Elsinore, which is the location within Denmark, this castle in which all of the action that we see takes place. He's out in Germany studying. He's a 30-year-old heir to the throne, and he'd rather be in Germany doing plays and reading philosophy. If that's not a good example of where we are historically, I don't know what is. He is more interested in books than the throne, right?

that there is something other than these ready-made ways for Hamlet to be. He'd rather be somewhere else. Does Ophelia kill herself or does she drown because she's not paying attention? Even that is kept in suspense, right? We don't get a specific... totally clear answer about what happened to Ophelia other than she's been so subject to the machinations of the crowned that it happens here. So that's one thing. And the reason that these...

not only do they have recognizable thoughts and feelings, we get access to them. And Shakespeare did not invent the soliloquy or monologue, but he did perfect. It goes back to sort of Roman theater. There are monologue soliloquies in Seneca, but... in hamlet especially and this happens for i think beatrice and much ado about nothing as well the the soliloquy as a place for the character to work out how they're feeling to articulate the complexity of what's going on inside

is new or again i don't know i'm not a scholar i shouldn't say but this is one these are the high points right you kind of come for these great soliloquies and there's some other stuff here too But the great to be or not to be, which is a cliche at this point, that's even started to see is what Hamlet is doing there is working through multiple morality systems.

to figure out how to be in the world. Frankly, whether or not he should commit suicide. I mean, he's basically writing in his journal out loud is what is happening in those scenes. And this is something that goes away a little bit. in the theater and art as we look for more psychological realism. But I would tender upon to you, a listener, and Rebecca as well, that any time you hear a voiceover in a movie, or you...

or you listen to a pop song that's told from a point of view, those are all in the Shakespeare soliloquy traditions. They all flow from a character speaking to us directly about what's going on inside. Especially, you know, musical theaters are maybe the best extent. You know how they say dinosaurs don't exist, but birds are still the most recognizable dinosaurs? The one song in a musical theater is the bird to the Shakespearean syllogically dinosaur. It's still around at least.

looks a little bit different but the narrative function our access to interiority is the same because you can't have them talking to someone else because these are private thoughts these are internal thoughts you can't have internal thoughts on the stage so what do you do you give these people these weird

theatrical moments of sort of talking into the air about what they're saying like no one would actually do it's it's a fascinating and it's so familiar it's hard to see the strangeness and wonder of it at the same time let's see what else to say just the greatest wielder of the english language ever do it i have one example here this is not a soliloquy but i found myself struck by the the play the mastery of form this is hamlet talking to someone

And he's just, he's using the metaphor. It's like, you don't understand me. You can't, you can't deal with me much like you couldn't just pick up that flute and play it. Right. And like, well, I can't play this. Nor should you play with me because he is so frustrated with people trying to think they can work him. That's what makes him more angry than anything is someone else thinks they could do something. They could do something with words to Hamlet. He's like.

You have no idea who you're dealing with here. It's like how unworthy a thing you make of me. You would play upon me. You would seem to know my stops. You would pluck. out the heart of my mystery you would sound me from my lowest note to the top of my compass and there is much music excellent voice in this little organ yet ye cannot make it speak sublud do you think i am easier to be played upon than a pipe

Call me what instrument you will. Though you can fret me, you cannot play upon me. So like that double fretting. Bars. Just like that's just this part. That's not even like the top 15 thing people reference in that. And it's like amazing. Like that's just in there. That's just sitting around. It's just unnecessarily amazing for what he's saying there, which is I'm smarter than you. That's essentially all he's saying. I mean, and I think that's one of the.

things also to remember just about the experience of reading hamlet is there are so many more words to say the thing than are necessary and most of them are pleasurable but also this is permission to not have to parse every single word because shakespeare is just having fun with the language. And in Hamlet, Hamlet is having fun with the language as well. But we as readers can, you can get.

what is happening in that scene from like the first sentence that he says. And then he goes on for five more just to like really rub it in and make his point because he's having a good time hearing himself speak and making them listen to him. But that like that comes back to me every time I read Shakespeare is there are so many more words than are actually necessary here. And it's very rare for that to be.

enjoyable. For me, it's enjoyable in Shakespeare. In a lot of other experiences, you're like, why do we have so much going on here? You could edit this way down. I don't need Shakespeare to be shorter, though, because the language is such a part of it. It's such a pleasure. Yeah. And so if you have experience of reading it or listening to it.

Give yourself permission to linger now and then. Go back and spend a little time. You don't have to do a full close reading, but like in this particular, just look at the layeredness of musical metaphors here and look at what he's actually saying about, you know. This is also about making art.

too right like you have to have the ability to play the thing to get the most out of the thing and there's something to be said if you're not going to listen to it on audio like read sections of it out loud I think if you get stuck read it out loud to yourself or to you know whoever is around

your house with you and in doing that and having to figure out like where should I put the emphasis in this sentence what is the cadence and the rhythm here some of that or what are the possibilities right a couple different ways out loud it makes itself more legible which is also one of the pieces of magic of how Shakespeare works. So what's your first time with this piece of magic?

With Hamlet? It was sometime in high school. Or any of it. Yeah, my first reading of Shakespeare was Much Ado About Nothing, that high school freshman experience. And I just did the math. I would have seen Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet in the theater before I had that experience. I had not read Romeo and Juliet. I didn't read that until later in high school. So I think that the Baz Luhrmann Romeo and Juliet might have been my first real experience with Shakespeare.

What a wonderful one for a teenager. It was great. We've read it and we've revisited that film together at least once in the history of Book Riot. And it holds up. So I feel great about that, actually, as a first. Shakespeare experience and they're talking fast they're running through the language quickly and really just they're just hitting the points that you really need to pick up to know what's happening there and I think in some way that might have primed me for being able

go into Shakespeare without stressing out so much about getting every last word of it, but being there for the vibe. Yeah, even there is a... There's a caricature of sort of a moldy version of Shakespeare performance that I think Robin Williams makes fun of in Dead Poets Society. Alas, poor Yorick, I knew him well, Horatio. With like the skull, right? And then there's a more rat-a-tat-tat Lerman where you get sort of the, there's energy from rapidity.

that comes what's funny about shakespeare adaptations is all people adapting or performing shakespeare are doing unto shakespeare what shakespeare was doing into other stories which is doing a version of them putting their own spin on them so the layers of interpretation adaptation and Transfiguration are dizzying and can be overwhelming and a put off. But if you can sort of go around the corner to how exciting the possibilities are.

That's where maybe some of the treasure was. What was yours? I don't remember. I know I saw the Mel Gibson Hamlet in the theater, and I would have been 13. I was looking at the calendar when that came out. And so already a book nerd, I don't remember if I had done any Shakespeare before then.

i do know that i went out and bought this very same copy this this this um mass market paper paperback after seeing that book has been through some things with you it's been it's it's i would have been carrying around my pocket all week i i have maybe i should make a necklace

like Flava Flav style. You and Jacob Elordi carrying around books in your back pocket. I know. Well, I'm a large man, so I can kind of hold it on to me in some particular way. And it's well trodden, well traveled. I mean, I don't know. It's like...

I think my own experience is sort of indicative to a lot of people, how they experience Shakespeare as a sort of, it's like always have been something, you know, is a big deal. Yeah, it's in the water, you know, and it's interesting you talking about how Shakespeare is riffing on other things, because I think one of the big.

reasons to read Shakespeare and especially one of the big reasons to read Hamlet is that so many other works draw on Hamlet and if you like listening to music and being like oh I know the song they're sampling here you can think of so much modern literature is sampling from Shakespeare or sampling elements from Hamlet. I was watching the premiere of The Lowdown last night and texting you like, there's an allusion to a Hamlet kind of storyline.

In one moment. And like, maybe that's not what Sterling Harjo is doing there. And I'm just looking through Hamlet goggles right now, but it. It looks familiar. And those things are all over the place. And that's fun. That's a fun part of reading culture to be like, oh, this goes back to this thing.

And so our current, and that's all informs our current reading of it. For me, every time I have an occasion to experience Shakespeare again, especially read, I should say, this is just for me, especially read. I have a moment. I have an intrusive thoughts. Maybe that would be a good format to have. Maybe we should have an intrusive thoughts section. I'm sad that we didn't think of this until after the Thomas Pynchon recording. My intrusive thought here is why do I read anything else?

and it's it's i don't think i don't believe that but i find the experience to be so great and so stimu i think stimulating stimulating is a good word It's so stimulating for many of the reasons we've said. And then just on the level of the line that I'm like, why do I do anything else?

But I have that same experience when I go to Morrison. I have that same experience when I go to Homer. I have that same experience when I go to Whitman. So this is not the only tinfoil I can chew on and get that kind of a buzz. But I do have it here. And maybe in its most... I think that's such a useful feeling to identify because people can tie themselves in knots trying to argue intellectually about what makes.

are great yes but i think you you know it when you feel it or you know it when you see it and something gets crowned as one of the greats when a lot of people have that same feeling about it that like this is the best

This is the epitome of a reading experience. Why would I want to do anything else? And all of the caveats in the world about how the canon was originally formed by pretty specific groups of people who were... pretty homogenous but as we like we still come to that we still have like a book of the summer or a book of the year or an agreement when something wins the national book award that like yeah that was the one

this year it doesn't always happen but when that happens it's really magical and i think that that's the feeling that we're all calling on when we have some sort of agreement about a work being excellent is that it inspires that like why would i want to spend my brain time with with anything else and shakespeare certainly evokes that um so what's what's like to read this what is it all about i think

I still, I find both pleasurable and frustrating that a lot of it I can't get on a first read and even a second or third read. There's just some stuff that eludes me in terms of word choice or illusion. And honestly, sometimes just that doesn't need a footnote. I'm like, I'm not really sure what's going on right here. I do think that that's to be expected. And some people might be that.

find that very frustrating and i find it frustrating to a point i think the other thing that it does for me is the play feels then inexhaustible because i can never get my my hand around it even something like never let me go which we love and we've recorded about. I kind of feel like I get it, Rebecca. Yeah. There's not a lot of mysteries left to uncover. I mean that more in like a...

Ellusian mysteries than sort of Agatha Christie mysteries. But here, it's always going to be out ahead of me. And I'm the kind of person that likes that. But not everyone does. So that's one. That was maybe my... my thing to that I would notice again this time. Yeah, I think it's disorienting to sit down and read Shakespeare in the way that reading anything that's 400 years old is disorienting and

That when you can go in with that expectation of like, I'm not going to get it. If that's just the water we're swimming in, I'm not going to get. I think that makes it much more enjoyable than a version that is like beating yourself up or stressing out about not getting everything. People have dedicated entire lifetimes to studying these works, and they have died saying... that there was more left to do. And the thing that blows my mind then as way of transition is...

What's amazing to me, and it could not have been intended by Shakespeare, I don't think, but who knows, man. I'm not going to pretend to be able to play the stops of that particular recorder, is the play itself is about the limits of understanding. The play itself is about what's beyond death. What is the right way to do this thing? What should I be feeling? How can I know things? Because...

As I say here in the notes, the word question itself appears 17 times in the play. And I didn't even count the question marks. A lot of Hamlet's soliloquies are sort of a series of questions. Yeah, a lot of his, I mean, he's thinking out loud, trying to... decide how to feel about things. And then once he has maybe got a beat on how he feels about things, what he should do with those feelings, how he should act, what does he owe his father?

as vengeance for this death how should he enact that vengeance what does it mean about him and then how is this spinning out to touch everybody else it's kind of it's all questions it's it really is grounded in that that feeling of being a person that is constant having to figure out what to do next right so good so good so good new markdowns are on at your nordstrom rack store

Save even more, up to 70%, on dresses, tops, boots, and handbags to give and get. Because I always find something amazing. Just so many good brands. I get an extra 5% off with my Nordstrom credit card. Total queen treatment. Join the Nordy Club at Nordstrom Rack to unlock our best deals. Big gifts, big perks. That's why you rack. This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Listening to this podcast, smart move.

Being financially savvy? Smart move. Another smart move? Having State Farm help you create a competitive price when you choose to bundle home and auto. Bundling. Just another way to save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state.

So, you know, one way to see this, and one of the reasons it has been deified, and I think that's a secular deification is what's happened to Hamlet and Shakespeare, is as the first... full-throated interrogator of the human condition, which is to have reason, to have knowledge, to be the greatest of all animals, how perfect.

is the human understanding. He waxes rhapsodic about what a noble thing and what an amazing thing humanity is. And yet, it's still not enough to know what happens after death. It's still not enough to cut the Gordian knot. of wanting to avenge your father and loving your mother and hating her, of how to deal with someone that you've wronged. What does justice look like? The imperfectibility of human life is central here.

Because he gets as clear a cut, a sense of wrong as anyone has ever gotten in art. Like he gets a ghost. He does the play. He overhears the confession. And yet that is still not quite enough to feel whole. He cannot bring his father back. Even the revenge play.

is not a mouse trap that can work in arrears to recreate the dead mouse he cannot bring his father back and that's the central sadness of hamlet is loss and imperfection and not knowing all that one would want to know the hamlet as it is most verbally unarmed in trying to have a feeling about his father he's sort of with the ghost and what to do about that feeling and so

I think that's really important to say. And you can even see that we get a bit of a hybrid being here too. Even if we look at the question of suicide, I had this in my notes. At one point he says, Oh, that the divine had not fixed itself against self-same slaughter. Oh, basically saying, I wish it wasn't a sin in the church to kill yourself. But that's not actually the reason he doesn't want to kill himself. Because in the to be and not to be soliloquy...

It's because you don't know what the hell's going to happen. You're afraid. You're a coward because you're fundamental. So we get really a transition from the reason not to commit suicide as well as a sin. No, really for Hamlet is because he doesn't know what the hell's going to happen. That's the limit of his understanding.

a real transitional thing you can see in the bigger thing here. Also, as happens, the church and understandings of the church, but also understandings of the court and traditional stories of kings and queens, Hamlet is fighting against expectation.

ceremony, tradition. He would, as I said, rather go plays and study in Wittenberg in Germany than come be a member of the court, right? He's gone. It's like, how weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable seem to me all the uses of this world. All he's read to me things that kind of... They suck. I don't want anything in this. And then you can see in a way of understanding the play is then all the other characters are possible ways of Hamlet being that he rejects.

Lair teases mode, Fortinbras' mode, Horatio, who's this antique Dane or Roman, a different kind of understanding from the classical world. But he's like, none of those are interesting. I'd rather play all the parts. And that's why I think Hamlet is probably the greatest role for people to try to play is get you get to do it all.

You get to be the fool and the lover and the fighter and the pontificator and the wronged son. It's an amazing part. I can only imagine what it's like to play it. It is an amazing part. And he's just, he's rejecting conventionality. He's rejecting all. of the roles that he sees the people around him playing and all of the boxes that his position in life has put him in like that he should be lined up to be the king someday that he should be comporting himself in a certain way he should

be concerned about what people think about him and he lets himself be completely completely unhinged he's just bananas all over the place he and his girlfriend are fighting in public he's yelling at people he's like sneaking around watching grave diggers he gets on a pirate ship

one point it's one of those stranger things that he's he's taken captive by pirates and then out duels them all dread pirate robert style there's a really like mythical quality to a lot of what he's doing but i think you're right on that and actor playing this role gets to have a great time and gets to flex a lot of muscles and just exist in so many different modes. And as a reader, as a viewer, as someone attending a play.

It's really, really fun to watch someone who's doing that and doing it well. It's enlivening and exciting anytime you watch somebody having a ball doing something. But I think a great performance of Hamlet is it's so up there with one. of the best things that you can watch someone do well and when they know they're killing it. It's just excellent. It's dizzying to think about what's actually happening when you're watching someone perform Hamlet. You're watching someone act.

someone acting like they're acting mad but they're actually not yeah because it is that antic disposition is a way for him to basically i don't know like Dance all over the court. It gives him permission to be weird. It's cover. Yeah, it's cover. It's cover. But also then it gives him access to different kinds of encounters and spaces that normally he wouldn't have access to. He couldn't say the things he was saying to these people.

If he thought they were playing it straight, it would give too much away. Yeah. So like the acting gives him your cover is the right way to put it. There's nothing good or bad but thinking make it so. What morality is that except that humans get to make our own meeting for good and for ill?

right one of the more famous lines that this comes from i'll say this you may have had this experience not you rebecca but other people and may have this experience with hamlet of getting frustrated for his quote-unquote indecision because it takes him four thousand

four hours and multiple thousand lines to do the revenging. And even that is sort of compromised. And my students often brought this to the tables. Like, why didn't he just do the thing? And I, and I answer with this. So this is my own.

Oh, and even I have the note here that even Lawrence Olivier's famous film of Hamlet begins with this. This is the tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind. I've never read it that way. This is so anyway. Yeah. But like and I answer with this. Does that really hold up? He does not immediately killed. Claudius True, but what he does is he conducts a moral investigation of Elsinore. Yeah, he springs right into action.

Yes. And the moment he does act rashly, once he gets confirmation that Gertrude really didn't know, and the ghost says, leave your mom alone, which is really interesting, by the way, for the gender politics of the ghost and whatever else is happening here. When he doesn't act rashly. It's terrible because of the limits of his understanding. So this, I think, if you think of this as a revenge play, yeah, it takes a lot to get there.

But if you think of it more of an investigation of Elsinore, of extant representations of morality, he's trying to figure out how he feels and what he knows more than what he should do. I've always made the case that Hamlet doesn't really want to kill Claudius. Or let me put it this way. He's not ultimately interested in killing Claudius because what he knows is that doesn't bring his dad back. And then he has to be king?

He doesn't want to be king. Yeah, I mean, he knows from the get-go what he's going to do. He comes out of the encounter with the king's ghost. Like, well, I got to take vengeance now. And the rest of it is... I've never read him as indecisive about it. It's really fascinating to me. But the rest of it is, how am I going to do this? What does it need to look like? And maybe some of it is feet dragging about not actually wanting to do it because he knows, as you're saying, that that won't.

It won't fill the hole that he's really trying to fill there. I mean, Hamlet is very emo. Yes. There is that. And so I think if you and this really depends on the actor, if you're seeing it performed like there is a version of Hamlet performed that like. Could you just stop whining already? Like stop to get out of your feelings. We get it. Get over it. And there's a point where one of the characters says this basically says to him, like, just get over it already and do something. But then like.

his dad's only been dead for two months. You're allowed to be emo. Yeah. Yeah. I said to Rowan, like, you know, if you want to tell your friends Hamlet's the first sad emo boy, that's not the worst way of understanding this.

But I think on the other hand, it's hard to remember now in 500 years of retrospect, how his expressions... were almost revolutionary and blasphemous nearly and it's humanism like what a piece of work is man how noble in reason how infinite in faculty in form and moving how express and admirable in action how like an angel in apprehension how like

a god so like there's something else going on here then boy where she really kills laertes because that's the quote-unquote just thing to do and he's not quoting other things going no he's not and especially when in a moment in history where The monarch is, you know, a manifestation of God's will. To say that, by extension, how like a man, that's not just man, but any man. You don't have to be the king or queen.

You don't have to be a priest here. The Protestant Reformation is in Germany. That's within his father's lifetime that that's happened. We are rethinking the relationship of divinity and humanity, and it's not looking great for the divine. in that in that re-estimation okay is this for you this is for you this is for everybody

Just try it, right? Just, yeah, just try it. And if you are worried, like, one of the reasons that I feel comfortable saying, just try this in a way where we've couched most of our other recommendations for like, maybe it's not for you is that People have worked really hard to make Shakespeare accessible for in so many different ways. So if the language is a problem for you.

no fear Shakespeare translations exist that are page like side by side of that's what I have yeah they have the quotations right on the other side the Shakespearean language and then the whole thing translated in just like plain today English

That is a great resource. Listening to it on audio is a great resource. Norton Critical Editions are always a great resource, but that's like a ton of footnotes. If you are a person who wants to understand everything or get like the Folger Annotated Edition that I... used is really wonderful go and like go to a library and look at a bunch of different versions of this and find one that feels accessible to you and then i think make part of your plan

be to either listen to it or to watch one or two of the movies afterwards like have the experience of watching some people perform it if you can go to a performance that's ideal and and then you i think you get an extra layer of the unruliness of shakespeare when you

get to see performances that so often are set in places that aren't Elsinore. They're not Elsinore Castle in the year 15 something. We move Shakespeare around into all kinds of contemporary settings and into all other modes and that flexibility. too is one of the things that makes it so magical but give yourself a way in that feels doable and and then just try it

I mean, if you really have never done any Shakespeare before, which we welcome all here, if you can find a production of literally anything close to you, go see something live first. Just see. it makes it more accessible to see real humans saying the words, and you're not going to understand it all, but you're going to get some of it. And some of it could be very tantalizing to you. It could lead to other things. Immortal questions aren't asked. All of them? Yes.

What is the good life? What do I owe my neighbor? How do I know what I know? Is this all there is? How to deal with the certainty of death? What else might there be? What's the deal with good and evil? This is all right there in the text. I mean, there's some of what do I—that's probably the least of these, the least of the apostles here. Yeah. Though it is there because Laertes and Polonius and Ophelia and—I mean, he is—as self-centered as Hamlet is, he is not—

Only self-centered. He's not, right. And one of the things that I think makes this a great work of literature and that makes other works that are great. great is that it's not just addressing some of these questions but it's trying to understand where these questions sit like in priority with each other once you've figured out what you owe your neighbor and what the good life is and how to deal with the certainty death or you started to answer some of those questions which ones

The answers to them are not all going to work with each other. They're not all compatible. So which ones do you give priority to if you know that death is certain and you feel like it's that murder is evil? And you think you owe your father vengeance for his death. How do you do the math? And you won't bring your father back. Right. How do you do the math there? Right. Yeah. That's a really good point is that you can get true and useful.

answers to these questions that are logical opposites or in conflict or undermined. Yeah, they do compete with each other. That's very true. Are we sure this isn't about art and writing? You say here the text is not really concerned with itself on that level. I will say there's a lot of theater stuff happening here that having studied a little bit and looking at the concordance, like our direct work, there's like...

Shakespeare is also a good example of why putting contemporary cultural references into your plays dates them, because there's stuff about internal actors versus children's guild war stuff that's in the play that's very strange. I think that the way this is mostly about art is mostly about theater. And I have a conspiracy theory. Tell me. Put on your tinfoil hat. Let's do it. I don't know if this is intrusive thought.

I love to think about the possibility of Hamlet realizing he's in a play. Oh. Where his attitude changes considerably after he rashly kills Polonius. He says there's greater purpose going on here. And I like to think that he is such a student of the theater that he could realize that I am actually in a revenge play. Do we think that 2025 Hamlet would believe that we're in a simulation?

I think I would like to see a version of Hamlet where he sort of breaks the fourth wall and walks out into the audience when he does this line about he appeals directly to the mute actors and audiences that there's bearing witness to the end.

that he's talking to them and when he does special providence there's special providence in the fall of a sparrow he's like looking at the lights and like the rigging to see like this is all a design that i am trapped within anyway that's my favorite thing but it's about theater and there's like a truman show element to your yeah or more luigi or more be a luigi parent

Dello, seven actors in search of a play where they break the fourth wall and they realize they're in a play and once the curtain falls, they'll be gone and into oblivion. But there's something that Hamlet exceeds the trappings of the theater and play so much that I kind of like the idea that Maybe his realization about the limits of his understanding is, I am not the playwright. I am the great actor and I'm the great character, but I am still not the playwright here. Anyway. That's fun.

Let's see. Best in words. I mean, good Lord. You need to go here. I think this is where you need to go because the phrases you collected that you just know. that come from Hamlet. Not just Shakespeare, but Hamlet. Yeah, this is an incomplete, well, these are all from Hamlet. Yeah, this is an incomplete list of phrases that you know, but you might not have realized came from Hamlet. Frailty, thy name is woman.

This above all to thine own self be true, which, by the way, largely taken out of context. Yes, it's ironical. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. A murder most foul. There are more dreams in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy. brevity is the soul of wit though this be madness yet there is method in it what a piece of work is man the plays the thing get thee to a nunnery the lady doth protest too much methinks alas poor york good night sweet prince

This next chunk of them are all in the one to be or not to be soliloquy. To be or not to be, that is the question. To sleep, perchance to dream. Aye, there's the rub. What dreams may come? And shuffled off this mortal coil. It's unbelievable. Those last five are all in half of a page of text. My favorite to note here are the ones that are cited unironically in which...

Polonius says them, who is kind of the courtly fool. He is so reasonable and so adroit in his manipulation of the court and understanding of its goings-on. that he is a fool. So like... Brevity is the soul of wit. That's Polonius. Shakespeare and Hamlet do not believe that brevity is the soul of wit. They believe in a maximalist witticism mantra. To thine own self be true. He's giving Claudius... It's a series of useful aphorisms of just sort of like getting along.

Yeah. Right. I've just sort of like playing along and keeping up appearances. But yeah, it's it's tremendous. It's hard to know what to do. There is so much. And then there are so many works that have been inspired. By Hamlet. We were talking off mic yesterday. You were saying we get a new Hamlet adaptation like roughly every 10 years. So there are a ton of films that you can pick from. But there's also Tom Stoppard's play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead. The Lion King.

is an adaptation of Hamlet. I had forgotten that until you put that in. That's my favorite. There's a film from the 90s called What Dreams May Come. That's not really a Shakespeare adaptation, but the line is taken from there. Also big in the 90s when we were first discovering that teenage girls had a psychology of their own. Mary Pfeiffer wrote a book called Reviving Ophelia that directly pulls from her reading of what

is happening with Ophelia here. The play that won the Pulitzer for drama in 2023 is called Fat Ham. It's by James E. James, and it's a spin on Hamlet set at a Black family's southern barbecue and the Hamlet character. is a Black gay man. And I got to see a production of that a year or two ago that was really terrific. So if you can see Fat Ham, go see it. But to watch how adaptable these stories and ideas are.

Bob Dylan wrote a song about the assassination of JFK called A Murder Most Foul. Nick Lowe wrote a song called Cruel to be Kind, which comes from a line in this play, I must be cruel only to be kind. Book titles, Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace. I mean...

The phrase infinite jest exists in Hamlet, and I was this week years old when I learned that. Oh, really? Was that your first time? I was like, oh, that's in here. That's Yorick. He's describing Yorick. Yeah, and The Wandering Stars, Tommy Orange's book from last year.

also a phrase that comes straight out of hamlet all over the place if you need us at you know an hour and 15 minutes into this podcast to sell you further on go read hamlet it's to pick up on this kind of stuff and to be able to say from your own reading and experience. That's what that's from. And let's put this in the hammer spot.

the lead single off Taylor Swift's new album is called the fate of Ophelia. And she's talked about apparently, and I haven't seen the interview about like, it's not, that's not just a reference. Like it's about, you know, it's another interpretation of Ophelia. and what she means and how she's caged and done wrong. Yeah, I mean, it's just all there waiting for you to experience. Hot takes, you go first. I think Shakespeare is actually not snobby.

We talked about this a little bit at the top, but what is happening in these plays is actually a really great antidote to annoying writerly stuff that bothers people about highbrow literature. The silliness, the bodiness. There's a lot of that. There's a lot of bodiness. There's a lot of wordplay. There's a lot of people sort of elbowing each other and raising their eyebrows. And there's dirty jokes. And there are...

so much double entendre. They're having a good time. The first light I saw in Rowan's eyes that she like kind of, she kind of saw the matrix of what Shakespeare could do was, and he says, I am too much in the sun. And you know, when. he's being told to come out underneath his clouds but like he's double sunned right because he's son of gertrude and now of claudius and like

She's like, oh, wow, that's really smart enough. Yes. Yes, it is. And that is the Hansel and Gretel breadcrumb I'm going to try to feed you to get you to burn in the witch's oven of Shakespeare nerddom. My hot take is if you can at least appreciate this, I really don't know how to talk to you about art.

I don't save to love it like I do. Yeah. But I think you've got to see, like, I kind of get what's going on. I can kind of see why this is a thing. And maybe more than anything else we're going to read and talk about this season, Hamlet exists in the zone of, like... I don't really care if I like it. I don't really care if you like it. I don't care if anybody else

likes it. Liking it is beside the point. This is so foundational to modern literature that if you want to engage with... If you care about that project. Right. If you care about that, which you're listening to this podcast. So we're making some assumptions. It's just one of those. And that great books, they're not about your enjoyment of them. They're about what they do, what they mean in the body of literature writ large.

Yeah, that's right. Let's see. Where we go? Cocktail party crib sheet. So I have Shakespeare himself probably played the ghost in the Player King, i.e. the father figures the Hamlet. Cue crying. My favorite anecdote that I'd watch a one-act play of by itself is the...

the story of Daniel Day-Lewis playing Hamlet. He did an eighth month run at Hamlet. And in the middle of one of the scenes where he's playing Hamlet, talking to his father's ghost, he was so overcome and said, this is something that was reported. that he said he saw his own father's ghost. He walked off the stage mid-performance and never has acted on the stage again. Oh my God, I've never heard that. That's incredible. It's an amazing story. Totally believable for Daniel Day-Lewis too.

Right, who when he was playing the lead in Unbearable Lightness of Being Learned Czech and didn't speak anything other than Czech for the whole... Yeah, he was here in Richmond when he was doing the Abe Lincoln film and the Daniel Day-Lewis sightings around town while being a method actor were very interesting. I think we did this before. No one really knows which version of this was performed.

There's sort of a cloud of possibility around Hamlet and all that we have for it. The first filmed edition was a short scene starring Sarah Bernhardt as Hamlet in a breeches role, meaning she was playing a man. Which is super interesting because when these were performed on stage, originally all of the parts were played by boys. And the first gender bent screen version of Hamlet was a 1921 German silent film in which the adaptation was Hamlet was actually...

a woman pretending to be a man to sort of protect her identity. So that's a hundred years just from now of playing with this stuff. I thought that was interesting there. All right. Our final thing. Zero well-read score. Each one gets one to 10, with 10 being the highest. No, we have to do the Muppets, Jeff. Oh, I'm sorry. This is a new thing. In addition to intrusive thoughts, which I think we actually need to bring into the future, this is, would this be watchable as a Muppet?

version where a human plays the main character. Okay, first I need to ride hard for just a moment for Hamlet 2000, which is the adaptation with Ethan Hawke and Julia Stiles. You can get what you need from Hamlet from one of the signal. adaptations. And that's a great one. You previewed this Muppets question for me yesterday. And I spent a lot of time last night thinking about who the human should be. And I have a few pitches. All right, let me hear.

My number one draft pick is Adam Driver. I want to watch Adam Driver be an emo Hamlet on stage with a bunch of Muppets. I couldn't love that idea more. Right. A little more obvious might be somebody like Josh O'Connor. Chalamet would get kicked around if this were getting cast today. Jacob Elordi would get kicked around.

I don't think Tom Holland necessarily. I think the bigger you are, the funnier it is. Yeah, yes. Driver's a big guy. Yeah, Adam Driver was the winner for me. And then also maybe like a Texas... Muppets version with Jesse Plemons. But Adam Driver is my A number one draft pick. I think that's very good.

I think this is sort of a meme that gets kicked around. And of course, it comes from there are Muppet versions of Christmas Carol, Treasure Island, where there's like one human character. They tend to be considerably less murdery than what they pick for those. This would require Adam Driver to like kill multiple Muppets. Yeah, I don't know. How do you like feel okay poisoning a bunch of Muppets at the end of this? But I love the idea of Adam Driver, you know, sort of.

Just talking trash to all these Muppets about how stupid they are. I sounded like a crazy person last night, just like sitting on the couch thinking about this and cackling to myself and trying to explain to Bob what I thought an Adam Driver version of Hamlet.

with the Muppets. I think if we gender bent it, Florence Pugh would be hilarious as Hamlet with a bunch of Muppets. Yeah. I mean, the immortal question, should we just put Zendaya in this movie? I think she'd be great. I think she'd be great as Hamlet. There'd be some interesting, his name is Hamlet, but Ophelia is Miss Piggy. There'd be some weird sort of puns and things going on there.

We can enjoy it. Okay, zero to well-read score, each score one to 10, 10 being the highest. The categories are historical importance, readability, current relevance, essential questions, book, nerd, read, credit, know-a-damn factor. Historical importance, 10. 10. There is no... I think there are only three 10s. There's...

Odyssey, well, there's four if you count Iliad and Odyssey as different. But the Bible, Iliad and Odyssey and Hamlet, I think, are the tens. I agree. Is there anything else? Yeah. Readability is tricky. This is going to be its lowest score. Like you said, it's not snobby, but it is arcane. Yeah. I have a hard time getting higher than six. Yeah, I was going to say five or six. I honestly had a harder time sticking with the language of Pynchon.

than Shakespeare. Oh, interesting. Because there's just the barrage of it. At least there's a rhythm to Shakespeare that you can get into. So I'm good with a six. Yeah, I think also if there's something you don't understand in Hamlet, it's kind of over relatively quickly. yeah right so current relevant central questions i mean this is a 10 forever forever 10. book nerd read card this is a 10. oh damn factor 10. also a 10 yeah so we're looking at 46 out of 50.

Only dinged for the readability. I don't see how anything's going to score higher, ever. This is like the highest possible score you can have. Because if you put the Bible on here, I don't think it's a 10 for oh damn. Maybe it's more readable. I think we will have a good time at Hot Greek Summer next year because I think the Odyssey might outscore this. Because it's more readable. Because reading in translation, I mean, that's also like a cheat. That's true.

I don't know. Anyway, but let's just say we're in rare air here. Yeah. As good as it gets. The goat for a reason. Did we do something? Did we entertain people? Did we help people today? You can email us and let us know zero to well read at book riot.com. And if you like the show, please rate or review it on, you know, Apple podcast, Spotify, your podcatcher of choice. And with that.

Zero to Well Read is a proud member of the Airwade Podcast Network. Rebecca, thank you so much. What a joy to get to talk. A real delight.