The 60/40 Portfolio: Does It Hold Up Today? - podcast episode cover

The 60/40 Portfolio: Does It Hold Up Today?

Apr 11, 202412 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

The 60/40 strategy, which involves investing 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds, has long been a go-to for risk-averse investors. But does this approach still hold its ground in today’s fast-paced market? Stay tuned as we explore the past, present, and future of this investment strategy and determine whether it’s still a cornerstone of wealth management or if it’s time to adapt to new realities.   

 Here’s some of what we discuss in this episode:

  • What is the 60/40 portfolio and what is its history?
  • How have recent economic factors affected the effectiveness of the 60/40 strategy?
  • What are the key considerations when rebalancing a portfolio, and what potential risks should investors be aware of?


WAYS TO CONNECT:

Book a 15-minute discovery call with the team here: https://calendly.com/rachel-bwg

Visit https://bulmanwealth.com/marcos-lemus to learn more about Marcos Lemus and the other members of the team.

If you have any questions about what we discussed or anything else in your financial plan, email us at ask@bulmanwealth.com. You can also reach the team by phone at (916) 458-8199.

Transcript

Is the 60-40 Investing Approach Outdated?

Speaker 1

Does the tried and true 60-40 investing approach still hold its ground in today's fast-paced markets ? Join us as we dissect the effectiveness of this classic strategy in the modern era . From market volatility to shifting economic landscapes , we'll uncover whether the 60-40 approach remains a cornerstone of wealth building or if it's time to adapt to some new realities .

Stay tuned as we explore the past , present and future of this investing strategy .

Speaker 2

Welcome . You are listening to the Bowman Wealth Group's Financial Compass Podcast , a show dedicated to helping you successfully navigate to and through your retirement . Our financial compass process goes beyond traditional holistic financial planning . We care as much about you and your lifestyle as we do about your plan .

Your hosts are Bowman Wealth Group financial advisors who , for more than two decades , have provided financial leadership for those they serve .

Speaker 1

This is Marcos Lemus . I'm a financial advisor at Bowman Wealth Group in Roseville , california , and you're listening to your Financial Compass . First of all , before we get started , I want to thank our listeners for tuning in . If this is your first time tuning in and joining us , thank you .

If you've listened to our podcast before , thank you certainly and welcome back . We do appreciate all the support . So , if anything sticks out and resonates with you maybe you have questions or you've got comments or feedback please , please , please , feel welcome to reach out to us at our email , that is , ask at bullmanwealthcom . A-s-k at Bowman Wealthcom .

So every episode we focus on specific topics or some questions that folks generally share from the financial realm , and today's particular topic is the 60-40 portfolio . Now , what is the 60-40 portfolio ? Does it still work in today's environment ? We're going to flush all of that out today , but before we start , I think it's important to understand what it is .

What is this 60-40 investment portfolio ? Is it broken ? What are some alternatives ? In order to do that , I have to briefly mention some history , really some finance history , and this is know . He argued via this theory that risk averse investors can create portfolios to optimize or maximize expected return based on a given level of market risk .

So you know , maximize based on market risk . Let's talk about that . So what is the 60-40 stock bond split ? For a long time , it was widely accepted that bond prices had an inverse or an opposite relationship with stock prices . So stocks go up , bond prices go down , but the bond yields rise .

Go down , but the bond yields rise , stock prices go down , bond prices go up and the yields fall . And this is safe to assume , because investors generally retreat from riskier positions when the markets fall and they turn to bonds as an alternative . Right , that was kind of the thought process . Stock market's riskier bonds are safer during these times .

So because these bonds offered higher yields when their prices are lower , it was seen as a safer bet . Now , as the market bottomed out , bond prices would peak and investors would jump back into the stock market at that time . So stocks rise , bond prices fall and their yields climb back up .

So essentially , the assumption was that stocks and bonds created this balance beam of sorts .

So the consensus is that this is a relatively low risk strategy that may work really well for people that are later in their careers , you know , pre-retirees and those nearing retirement , because this is a low risk thing so that's of greater importance at that point in your life , since the bull markets usually last longer than bear markets .

60% of the portfolio is in stocks in this situation . Right , that's where the 60 comes from and that would provide you a nice upside gain during those bull market years . Right , given that they last a little bit longer than bear markets .

And the other 40% that 40 , that part of the portfolio would offer you a little bit of upside and yields during those bear markets . So we're kind of covering our bases there . So sounds great . What went wrong ? Well , in late 2010s , something interesting started to happen to the bond and stock markets .

The markets and the economy both came out of the 2008 global financial crisis completely . However , interest rates were kept pretty low by the Federal Reserve for an extended period of time , were kept pretty low by the Federal Reserve for an extended period of time , and the Federal Reserve chair at the time , Janet Yellen , made that decision to keep them low .

Some economies that were seeing extended periods of low economic growth even after the crisis introduced negative interest rates , which is crazy . Some financial regulation became so strict after 2008, . There was a worry that if interest rates were to climb back up , there'd be too much pressure on the financial health of the overall economy .

So the result was that stocks continued to rise while bond values rose right along with them , and this , of course , blurred that inverse relationship between stocks and bonds that everybody was so used to . So when you think about this , this is great for people who had 60-40 portfolios .

You know they were making money on both sides and everything was booming until the economic uncertainty came about , meaning that that low risk strategy wasn't as low risk anymore . So when interest rate hikes are needed to fight inflation which we're seeing now , as of recent years , you know bonds get cheaper and the stock market falls .

Due to businesses facing higher costs of borrowing , it's not as easy to borrow money . Essentially , that inverse relationship between the stocks and the bonds gets completely destabilized , making this balance beam that we referenced of that 60-40 portfolio not the case anymore .

So , although there should be a return to this inverse relationship between the stocks and the bonds , there's really no telling when or if it may come back . And this may be great during the bull market years , as I mentioned , but of course , during recent years , this is doubly costly , right ? We're seeing that now .

2022 , just a couple years ago was a unique year for bonds . They experienced their worst year historically as the Fed was aggressively raising interest rates to battle the high inflation , and you know we're still seeing the effects of that now . But think back to 2022 . Equities in the stock market had a bad year . Bonds were having a bad year .

The traditional playbook said to move more into bonds . Right , move our equities into bonds , which were previously seen as safe investments . In tough times in the economy , this wasn't a viable option in 2022 , right , because both were having a not so great year .

So , to use an analogy , we certainly couldn't move from a hot frying pan to another hot frying pan and , as a result , folks needed to look elsewhere for more conservative alternatives .

Now many advisors have alternative options or strategies that can provide similar diversification to this traditional 60-40 portfolio split , and these are ones that may not include such direct exposure to bonds .

So some bond alternatives may include , maybe private equity funds , fixed index annuities , fias or other alternative investments that can become the other side of that balance beam that was expected to be achieved by the traditional equities bond splits .

So when you think about rebalancing your portfolio , yeah maybe it could be a smart decision , but what are some things we should be careful of and watch out for when we're performing a rebalance ? Well certainly tax implications right .

To rebalance Well certainly tax implications right If this is , say , it's a non-qualified account , meaning a non-retirement account , not a 401k or an IRA . Want to be aware of taxable events ? and just making sure that we're cognizant of trading out of things that maybe are up or down . So just being aware of that Penalties , right .

Maybe part of our rebalance includes a withdrawal from retirement accounts of some kind . We just want to make sure we're aware of how am I going to rebalance ? I think another thing is just not being too hasty .

So if your whole savings plan was in a 60-40 portfolio and you shift it all to a new plan , well , there's certainly no guarantee that that new plan is going to be better . If your financial plan is one-dimensional , it's all in this 60-40 , that's not your biggest issue . The 60-40 strategy isn't your biggest problem there .

It's really the lack of a holistic financial plan that addresses all of your financial needs and goals . So , listen , it's easy to stick to what you know , and sometimes we know that it's best to go for what works rather than gamble on a new thing . But when that old way of doing things stops working , it can be costly to hang on to in terms of a strategy .

When it comes to your 60-40 financial plan , the downside risk of that generic plan maybe ends up costing you more than you want to in terms of your hard-earned savings . And when you think about how costly that downside is .

You may not want to risk your retirement finances like that , especially when there are some solid alternatives that a financial professional can help you with and can help you implement . So , again to our listeners , this has been certainly a high-level look at the traditional concept of the 60-40 portfolio split .

But again , we're just scratching the surface here and if you want to dive deeper into this topic , I encourage you to keep an eye out for future podcasts . Keep an eye out for our newsletters we send out biweekly , or ask to discuss this with your financial advisor If anything that you heard here resonated with you today .

Maybe you've got comments , maybe you have questions or you just want to dive deeper into your particular situation . Shoot us an email and that email address again is ask at bullmanwealthcom . That's A-S-K at bullmanwealthcom . I want to thank you all again for listening , regardless of the podcast platform you're tuning in from .

We certainly appreciate you joining us and tuning in . We appreciate you , we appreciate your reviews , your feedback and , most of all , we appreciate you for giving us your most precious asset your time . Join us next time on your financial compass .

Financial Advisory Disclaimer Notice

Speaker 2

This has been your host , marcos Limas , with the Bowman Wealth Group . Take care , catch you next time . Take care , catch you next time . Purchases are subject to suitability . This requires a review of an investor's objective , risk tolerance and time horizons . Investing always involves risk and possible loss of capital .

Opinions expressed are solely those of Bowman Wealth Group and our editorial staff . The information contained in this material has been derived from sources believed to be reliable , but does not guarantee accuracy and completeness and does not report to be a complete analysis of the materials discussed .

Any statements or opinions expressed should in no way be construed or interpreted as solicitation to sell or offer to sell advisory services to any residents of any state other than the states where otherwise legally permitted . Advisory services are offered through Chris Bowman Inc . Dba . Bowman Wealth Group .

Registration as an investment advisor does not imply a certain level of skill or training . Insurance products and services are offered and sold through Chris Bowman Inc . Dba . Bwg Insurance Agency .

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android