You, me & the UPC - podcast cover

You, me & the UPC

Bristows LLPwww.bristowsupc.com

Bristows' patent litigation experts unpack key UPC decisions, explore their implications, and share practical strategies to help your business navigate the UPC with confidence.

Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.

Last refreshed:
Follow this podcast in the Metacast mobile app to refresh it and see new episodes.
Download Metacast podcast app
Podcasts are better in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episodes

Case by Case | Court of Appeal clarifies urgency and waiver of invalidity defences in provisional measures proceedings

The Court of Appeal (CoA) has overturned the Paris LD’s refusal of provisional measures and granted a Preliminary Injunction (PI) preventing Viatris Santé from marketing its fampridine generic (which is for the improvement of walking speed in adult patients with MS) in France until expiry of Merz’s SPC in July 2026. Listen to Aida Tohala's review of this decision in this episode of You, Me and the UPC: Case by case. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@...

May 22, 20264 minEp. 58

Case by Case | Düsseldorf Local Division rejects expert bias challenge and upholds ex parte inspection regime

Aida Tohala walks you through an Order dated 4 May 2026, in which the Düsseldorf Local Division (LD) dismissed challenges to both the impartiality of the Court appointed experts and to the underlying ex parte inspection and evidence preservation order concerning Topsoe A/S’s patent EP 3 802 413 relating to a plant for producing hydrogen. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on Link...

May 22, 20264 minEp. 57

Case by Case | The Hague Local Division dismisses Stratasys Preliminary Injunction application following narrow claim construction on purge towers

Rebekka Thomas looks at the Hague LD's order in respect of an application for provisional measures by Stratasys against BambuLab. The dispute concerned BambuLab’s 3D printer (referred to as H2C), which was launched at a trade fair in Frankfurt in November 2025. Find out more about Bristows UPC expertise here . If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

May 15, 20263 minEp. 56

Case by Case | Mannheim Local Division grants Nokia ex parte anti-suit injunction in relation to Chinese interim licence application

The UPC continues to provide anti-suit relief in FRAND actions where it considers its jurisdiction may be compromised by the grant of interim licence applications in other Courts. In the UPC, Nokia is pursuing SEP infringement actions against Chinese car manufacturer, Geely. In response Geely initiated rate-setting proceedings in a parallel action before the Hangzhou Court in China and applied for a worldwide “ interim licence ” by way of a preservation order. Nicholas Round explores this case i...

May 15, 20263 minEp. 55

Case by Case | Court of Appeal reaffirms approach to Security for Costs

On 7 April 2026, the CoA reaffirmed that a request for Security of Costs (SoC) may be made against an appellant, regardless of the party’s status as a claimant/defendant in first instance proceedings. Hannah Rigby provides a compressive overview of this decision in today's episode. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

May 08, 20264 minEp. 54

Case by Case | The Milan Central Division clarifies holistic novelty assessment and the limits of auxiliary requests

Jonathan Ross analyses the Milan Central Division's (CD) decision to revoke Flexicare (Group) Limited’s unitary patent EP 4 185 356 following a revocation action brought by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited. Listen today. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

May 08, 20264 minEp. 53

Case by Case | Paris Local Division revokes Michelin patent following novelty challenge based on single prior art document

Fariha Chowdhury is back with another UPC case update. Today, she looks at the Paris LD's decision to revoke Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin’s European patent EP 2 323 858 B1 (EP 858) in its entirety and dismissed Michelin’s infringement action against three Goodyear group companies. Listen today, and don't forget to subscribe! If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on...

May 01, 20264 minEp. 52

Case by Case | Court of Appeal clarifies limits of cross appeals under r.220.1 while granting preliminary injunction in Abbott v Sinocare

Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. (Abbott) brought proceedings against Sinocare Inc. and A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l. (together the Respondents) alleging infringement of EP 3 988 471, which concerns a continuous glucose monitoring system displaying real‑time glucose data together with event information. Fariha Chowdhury explores the case in detail in this episode. Don't forget to subscribe so you don't miss any UPC case updates. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcp...

May 01, 20263 minEp. 51

Case by Case | GC Aesthetics succeed in r.190 application for implant samples and key technical and regulatory files

On 14 April 2026, the Brussels Local Division (LD) handed down an order under r.190 RoP requiring Establishment Labs S.A (LABS) to produce a range of evidence, including soft tissue implant samples and various technical and regulatory documents, within 21 days, following a successful application made by GC Aesthetics. In our 50th episode, Cassie Blackburn dives into the details of the decision. Listen today and don't forget to subscribe. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please e...

Apr 24, 20265 minEp. 50

Case by Case | Milan Central Division conclude proceedings following EPO revocation

Claire Wilson takes a look at the Milan Central Division's decision to dismiss ongoing revocation proceedings between Neurocrine Biosciences and Spruce Biosciences as devoid of purpose under r. 360 RoP. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Apr 24, 20261 minEp. 49

Case by Case | Court of Appeal reaffirms strict duty of candour in ex parte evidence orders

Chloe Dickson looks at the Court of Appeal decision to uphold the revocation of an order obtained ex parte by Ecovacs against Roborock for inspection of robot vacuum cleaners at a trade fair. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Apr 17, 20262 minEp. 48

Case by Case | Private Transcripts of Oral Hearings Permissible Under r. 115 RoP

Lucy Sewter explores how the CoA overturned a decision of the Mannheim Local Division (LD) that had refused Amazon permission to produce a private transcript of an oral hearing in proceedings UPC_CFI_936/2025 between Amazon and InterDigital. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Apr 17, 20264 minEp. 47

Case by Case | Court of Appeal overturns Paris Local Division’s extension of UPC jurisdiction for foreign infringement allegations

On 13 March 2026, the Court of Appeal (CoA) has set aside the Paris Local Division’s (LD’s) decision (dated 27 November 2025) that had dismissed the preliminary objections and accepted jurisdiction over alleged infringements occurring in several non-UPC states between Keeex and several US and Irish based defendants. Lucy Sewter explores the case in detail. Listen now. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we releas...

Apr 10, 20263 minEp. 46

Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms that unprotected disclosures cannot later be made confidential and clarifies strict limits on confidentiality under r. 262 and 262A RoP

Chloe Dickson talks you through a decision concerning EOFlow’s request for an order that certain information on the extent to which it had committed acts of infringement of Insulet’s patent be designated as confidential and withheld from public inspection. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Apr 10, 20262 minEp. 45

Case by Case | Munich Local Division rejects limits to patent attorneys and experts in confidentiality club

On 24 February 2026, in UERAN v Xiaomi, the Munich Local Division (LD) corrected an unopposed clerical omission in its January confidentiality order by adding several missing paragraphs of the Statement of Defence. Listen to Eden Winlow in today's episode, who unpicks the decision. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Apr 02, 20263 minEp. 43

Case by Case | Court of Appeal refers questions to the CJEU to clarify the scope of long-arm jurisdiction

Eden Winlow covers the Court of Appeal's (CoA) first ever referral to the CJEU. In which the CoA has sought clarity on the application of long-arm jurisdiction in situations involving non-EU defendants alleged to have infringed patents using the services of an EU-based intermediary, such as an authorised representative. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Mar 27, 20265 minEp. 41

Case by Case | Court of Appeal reaffirms requests for public access documents under r. 262.1(b) RoP

On 24 February 2026, the CoA issued two decisions that reinforce the need for precise requests from third parties for public access under r. 62.1(b) RoP. Eden Winlow explores both decisions in this episode. Listen today and don't forget to subscribe! If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Mar 26, 20263 minEp. 42

Case by Case | Munich Central Division confirms patent validity in display glass composition dispute

On 24 February 2026, the Munich Central Division dismissed TCL’s revocation action against Corning’s patent concerning methods for producing alkali free glass for display substrates. These glass sheets are used in Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Display (AMLCD) applications. Rachael Cartwright dives into the detail in this episode. Listen now! If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on L...

Mar 20, 20266 minEp. 40

Case by Case | UK High Court and UPC Mannheim Local Division issue divergent rulings in Amazon–InterDigital FRAND Dispute

Sam Harvey takes a look at two decisions issued by the UK Court and the UPC’s Mannheim LD in the ongoing multi-jurisdictional dispute between Amazon and InterDigital over the terms of a RAND licence to InterDigital’s SEP video codec portfolio. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Mar 20, 20267 minEp. 39

Case by Case | Court of Appeal rules on both validity and infringement without remitting the case to the Local Division

Fariha Chowdhury looks at the Court of Appeals decision in Rematec GmbH & Co. KG v Europe Forestry B.V. , reinstating European patent EP 2 548 648 and overturning the Mannheim LD’s earlier revocation. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Mar 13, 20264 minEp. 38

Case by Case | Court of Appeal refuses to stay revocation appeal pending EPO Opposition

Labrador initiated proceedings on 12 June 2024 by filing an infringement action against certain bioMérieux entities before the Düsseldorf LD. In response, bioMérieux UK filed a revocation action before the Milan Central Division (CD) on 30 August 2024, while other entities lodged a counterclaim for revocation within the Düsseldorf infringement proceedings. Listen to Fariha Chowdhury detailed analysis. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . ...

Mar 13, 20263 minEp. 37

Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms no unitary effect without full participating state designation

On 9 February 2026, the Court of Appeal (CoA) dismissed an appeal from Papst Licensing GmBH & Co. KG (Papst) against a decision of the European Patent Office (EPO) rejecting Papst’s application for unitary effect. Olivia Henry explains more in this episode. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Mar 06, 20263 minEp. 36

Case by Case | Paris Central Division finds subsidiary is not the “same party” as its parent company and can start separate proceedings

Milly Wickson takes a look at the decision in which the Paris CD held that ALD France S.A.S. is entitled to bring revocation proceedings against Nanoval’s patent EP 3 083 107 B1, notwithstanding the parallel infringement and revocation actions involving ALD’s German parent company and Nanoval before the Munich LD. Listen now! If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Mar 06, 20262 minEp. 35

Case by Case | Court of Appeal upholds revoking of Saisie Order and Clarifies Limits on Amended Requests Under r. 222.2 RoP

The Court of Appeal (CoA) recently dismissed Centripetal’s appeal against the Mannheim LD’s decision (following a request for review) to revoke an earlier saisie order, on the basis that Centripetal’s request was inadmissible. Listen to Maria Ryan in today's episode for more details on the decision. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Feb 27, 20262 minEp. 34

Case by Case | Paris Local Division Orders Henkel to Disclose Technical Data Sheets in Bostik Infringement Action

On 4 February 2026, the Paris LD granted Bostik’s request that Henkel (the alleged infringer) produce evidence under Art. 59 UCPA and r. 190 RoP. The request was for current data sheets for certain of Henkel’s Loctite Liofol branded flexible laminate packaging products. Jonathan Ross explains more in this episode. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Feb 27, 20262 minEp. 33

Case by case | Court of Appeal clarifies requirements for confidentiality

Luke Norton explores the Court of Appeals decision, handed down on 29 January 2026, addressing confidentiality and r. 262A RoP in the dispute between EOFlow and Insulet. Listen now and don't forget to subscribe! If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Feb 20, 20261 minEp. 32

Case by case | Hague Local Division grants Abbott Preliminary Injunctions, extending long arm jurisdiction to non-EU countries.

On 6 February 2026, The Hague Local Division (LD) granted Abbott provisional injunctions in relation to two of its Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) patents, EP 3 960 072 (the insertion device patent) (EP 072) and EP 2 720 610 (the stacked sensor patent) (EP 610). Maria Ryan dives into the details of this case in this episode. Check it out today. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow...

Feb 20, 20263 minEp. 31

Case by case | Munich LD orders security for costs against Taiwanese claimant in ASUS v OPPO

On 12 December 2025, the Munich LD ordered ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. (ASUS) to provide security for costs in the amount of EUR 200,000 following an application by the defendants, including Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd (OPPO), under r. 158.1 RoP. Nischay Mall dives into the detail of this decision. Listen today! If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on Link...

Feb 13, 20263 minEp. 30

Case by case | Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses Ona Patents SL’s infringement action against Google

Rebekka Thomas talks you through the Düsseldorf Local Division's (LD) decision dismissing Ona Patents SL’s (Ona) infringement action against Google Ireland Limited and Google Commerce Limited (together, Google) while simultaneously upholding the patent’s validity by dismissing Google’s counterclaim for revocation. If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com . Find all the episodes as we release them here . Follow us on LinkedIn ....

Feb 13, 20262 minEp. 29
Hosted on Buzzsprout
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android