61 - Tahmina Watson - Immigration Lawyer and Published Author - podcast episode cover

61 - Tahmina Watson - Immigration Lawyer and Published Author

Feb 09, 202557 minEp. 61
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

My guest Tahmina Watson is an accomplished immigration lawyer and published author. Together, we discuss Work Visa classifications, how they affect working immigrants, and the regulations behind them. We also touch on other sensitive immigration issues, but we ran short of time, as this is a very complex issue with many variables that needs further discussion.

Support: https://buymeacoffee.com/worldablaze

Email: worldablaze@fontesmedia.com

Web: https://www.worldablazepodcast.com/

X: https://x.com/fontesablaze

FB: https://www.facebook.com/worldablazewithgeorgefontes

Please like, follow, and share the show!!!!

Transcript

Speaker 1

You are listening to a Fonds Media Network production.

Speaker 2

Welcome to episode sixty one of World Ablaze. On this episode, I have Tamina Watson. Tamina Watson is the founder of Watson Immigration Law, where she has an expertise in investor business and family based immigration. She is a published author of multiple books and a strong advocate for immigration reform.

We spend some time discussing the various work Jesus how they relate to a person's immigration status, as well as touched on some other immigration issues that relate to the United States and how that may affect immigrants around the world. I hope you find this conversation informative and I hope that it opens the door for having further conversations with you, your friends, and your family about this sensitive issue. Well, firstly, I thank you for being here or taking the time

to be here. I know that you're busy. I was reading up a little bit on you and you're an published author, have another book coming out, Which is what's an achievement for I mean, just doing one is an achievement. But I mean which which number book is this? It's like number.

Speaker 1

Let's see six, sixty six or seven. Yeah, I mean Yeah, you know, I love saying I've lost count I went to ninety two, like Deepak Chopra or something. How did get to ninety something? What are they doing that? I don't know how to do? So yeah, I'm working on it. But it's interesting. Every book has journey and life of its own, and this is at the early stages of its life.

Speaker 2

Yeah, that's that's crazy. That's something I've never done, never achieved, And so hats off to you for that. And you specialize in immigration law, correct or did you practice any other types of law before then?

Speaker 1

I practice immigration US immigration law now for my entire career in the United States, But when I lived in London, I was born and raised in London, and I was a lawyer there. In my early days, I did criminal defense law, some amounts of civil law practice.

Speaker 2

Okay, So one of the reason I want to well, one of the bigger reasons I reached out to you is because one you're an authority on this. Two you are published, and you do have a law firm that specializes in this, namely immigration and immigration law. And with everything going on, I wanted a perspective from someone who's actually in it, who can actually interpret law and can explain what's really going on and what rights there are for those that are considered illegal or undocumented that are

coming into our country. And from what I understand, there's always like there's a difference versus when they're on one side of the border and when they cross over. And of course there's the other situation where airports are kind of like Switzerland or neutral if they don't really have any borders, like they're not a country right until they

actually cross over into the destination they're going to. So there's a lot of that, And I also want to get your opinion on how things are being handled by the administration. And we don't have to get too political per se, but I do want to get some better explanation of the laws, the rights and is the administration going about this the correct way. Because I have my opinions, I know other people have their opinions. Again, you know,

I talk to like people in the intelligence community. I have other journalists I speak with, and not a lawyer though that specializes in this particular subject matter. So with that being said, I thought, hey, to me, and maybe you can help us with this, Maybe you can explain a little bit you know would.

Speaker 1

I would be honored. My question for you is who is your primary audience?

Speaker 2

Well, our audience is pretty much I don't know everyone whoever is willing to listen. To be quite honest, if we have worldwide audience, multiple countries, hundreds of thousands of downloads, so I'm not really sure exactly who everyone is.

Speaker 1

But a great problem top Yeah, well.

Speaker 2

I don't know about that. I just I just try to keep things going and make sure everybody is satisfied whoever does like my particular brand anyway, and I think everybody who is listening to this episode now, which is great, but you know, regardless, again, I'll be honest, this show can get political, but there's times where it's not. It's just, hey, let's talk about the facts. Let's talk about what's going on. Let's talk about what's happening from a factual standpoint, from

the standpoint backed by data. And that's one thing that I'm hoping that you can do for us, you know. And one of the things that were that was in well contested for a while or people didn't understand and even I'm still foggy on was was the right to work as in you know, the h H one H two A visas or H two B visas. Can you explain how that works and how that relates to someone who has one of those visas and works in the United States.

Speaker 1

Sure, so, thank you so much again, George for having me and asking some of these brilliant questions, because when people hear sound bites in the news, it gets even more confusing because one side it says one thing and another says another, and then you know, the listener or the layperson doesn't know really where anything stands. So just

back basics for a moment. The United States immigration system was created in nineteen ninety and the current system that we work with, and it created a family based system, element based system. In the employment based system, we have temporary work visas and we have green card options. But the temporary work visas or the temporary visa programs are in the employment based system. There's no temporary visa in

the family based system. The family system is primarily get a green card you with misfah with you, and so in the employment based pre visa categories there are various different types of visa categories which are labeled as ault and then a number and so H one B, H two B, H two A one A one B. And so there are these letters and numbers and then letters again that signa for specific categories of visas. And when it comes to these visas, they're really defined by the

type of work somebody is going to be doing. So if you're a priest coming here to be a priest to add a church, you would get a religious visa R one. If you are quote unquote a genius, one of the top people in your profession, be getting an old visa, And that was a matter of controversy see during the first time President Trump was in office because the first Lady had that visa. So the H one

B visa is a work visa as well. And the basic premise of the H one B visa is that you must have a bachelor's degree in a specific subject matter that gives you the academic training and theoretical training to do a particular job that requires that training. So even though I'm a lawyer, i would not be eligible for a job in the computer industry because my degree is not in computer science. Okay, so the specific degree

has to match a specific job. Any work visa has three primary requirements to show number one that there is an employer. Number two, there's a job, and number tho, there's an employee that you're going to sponsor. The employer is going to sponsor. Now, the employer has to make specific promises number one that they are going to pay the prevailing wage for that type of job in that

type of breer. So an entry level doctor in Kansas City may get let's call it, fifty thousand dollars a year, but the entry level doctor in New York might be getting seventy thousand dollars a year. So the prevailing wage is determined by the Department of Labor and they decide what the salary will be, and the employer has to essentially promise that they will pay that salary. So that's the number one promise and number two promise is that they are they have the finances to pay that salary

for a job that actually truly exists. Okay. And so when we hear debates in the news, often the debate is about bringing in cheap labor, particularly on the H one B front. You might remember around Christmas twenty twenty four was major you by controversial disctions where Elon Musk supports the H one B, and Steve Bannon does not support the H one B, and then President Trump that yes, he supports the H one B, And so there's controversy among leadership about the benefits of an H one B.

But what are the facts. The facts are that employers in the United States, such as Microsoft, Amazon, Boeing, you name the big corporation, they use H one B visas because they generally cannot find enough talent to take those jobs. Why is that is because our education system is not

producing sufficient talented minds or people for our workforce. Now, the question that comes up from that is, well, they're cheap labor, You're paying them less, And the answer is no, if anything, it costs more to hire somebody on an H one B. And the reason is not only are they they the employer making the promise as per the Department of Labour's guidance, but they also have to be competitive because the people that they are trying to recruit

are being courted by multiple companies, and so they have to make sure that the employer's offer is attractive enough for somebody to say, yes, I would like to join you. So they are often being competitive in the market. But secondly, the employer has to then pay for legal fees, HI fees, compliance fee go forth. And so for anybody listening, each one B is an important visa in our immigration system because often people behind the scenes that are managing important

parts of our lives. And you just need to look at your telephone, your cell phone, the hardware, the network, the software often are being managed by high skilled immigrants who might be working at some of these telephone companies or the wireless companies, or the you know, the technology companies. All the apps that you have on your phone by a lot of high skilled immigrants.

Speaker 2

Okay, so that was that was great on clarifying the H one B I have. I also have further questions as the differences between classification H one versus H two. But I want to back up a bit, because you're right, a lot of people were thinking this is just cheap labor, and I want, I want to want to say something about that, and I'm kind of I'm not saying I'm correcting this, but I'm kind of thinking where this argument

possibly may have come from. And I know this from the construction industry and various other businesses that I've owned also throughout the years, and I will say that sometimes there's a difference between prevailing wage and the market value

of a job in a certain area. So let's say construction work, for example, if you're a framer, prevailing wage I've just thrown this out there could be twenty five dollars an hour, but due to the market demand and what usually pays an experienced framer in that particular area, they're actually getting paid let's say upwards of forty five

dollars an hour, especially if they're in the union. So I'm wondering if that may have contributed to the misunderstanding of you know, as you said, cheap labor was it was it Could it have been a difference between what was considered a market value for a job and what was considered a standard prevailing wage.

Speaker 1

That's a really, really astute question, and that could be a perception that a lot of people have. But I come back to competitiveness of the limited amount of talent that there is in this country. And so when I now, I live in Washington State, so it's very easy for

me toly talk about Microsoft and Amazon. But when there is somebody both these companies might want to hire, and the startup smaller companies want to hire the same person, they have to be competitive with competitive market rates, otherwise they will not have that talented person join them. So while there is perception, that actually is probably widespread, George, So great question. Thank you for asking that the pool of people that these companies can draw from are still

limited and so you have to pay market value. And in addition to that, there are you know, no no secret if you go look at any job ad for Monster dot com or Indeed dot com or wherever salaries are posted, and these salaries when somebody promises a salary that is through a form on the Department of Labor's website, and the Department of Labour's website will have a lot of data that can be accessed by the public. And so it it is again coming back to you, George.

It's a good question, But the reality is these companies pay the market value.

Speaker 2

Right, And I was just asking the question because I'm wondering if that's where that perception came from, and they

probably because I've seen it myself, you know. And I'm not saying that applies to the situation for example, when we're talking about engineers, but just wondering if the public may have I don't know if someone out there probably came across out data and they thought, well, yeah, they're getting cheap labor, and of course it has to be competitive, especially and you know, again I have been an employer,

and I do know that. Listen, if you stay a salary in publicly and is plubbly available, everybody has to be you know, offered the same wage, at least the same starting wage, and then you know, move up from there. So I understand that I was just wondering if you thought that might that that issue that I brought up may have been part of that misperception. Is I guess how I should have worded it as to whether or not they're really paying for cheap labor. I don't believe

that's the case. Is but I do want to ask you this, is there a myth? Is it okay? Is this a myth with with an H one visa, for example? Is is there a contract between the employer employee as for a certain amount of time? Is that true?

Speaker 1

Sure? Yes, that's that's actually part of the application process where you have an off letter or a contract that spells out the terms of the employment. H one vs can be part time, and the contract would specify that, but the actual application form would also specify if it's part time of full time. The boxes on the forms ask specifically full time, part time wages, hourly, annual, monthly,

whatever the way it is. And so that's a contract and the employer actually has to contract with whatever else they're doing they have. There's a lot of compliance involved where if they are applying for a NACHU one B, the employer has to post a copy of the quote unquote wage promise that we just talked about in an inconspicuous place in their office for ten days so everybody can see it. So if anybody is, you know, feeling

like there's an issue, they can most definitely complain. But it's there is a process for this and it has to be open and that posting is a very important part of it to make sure there's visibilit and compliance and then all of those forms get signed by them.

Speaker 2

But I guess my question was more about the time. I guess I should have been more clear about the question in my questioning was, Okay, does the employer enter contract with the person who is to be contracted under this H one visa? As in their sponsor them. So does that mean that they're committed to this company like that person's also committed this company and working for them for let's say two years, three years, four years, five years. Is that true of an H one as well?

Speaker 1

Very good question. So, uh, the employment contract will look exactly the same as it would for you and me if we were hired. Gotcha, So the employment contract wouldn't look necessarily different. It might have an additional couple of paragraphs saying subject to approval of your H one B, but H one b's initially will be or any any H one can be issued for up to three years, okay, but total time that we can have on an H

one B is six years. So they can they have to first get into a lottery, and the lottery period is opening up March seventh to twenty fourth this year, and if somebody is selected in the lottery, then they don't have to be in the lottery again once you know Employer A has has gone through the lottery. HAN sponsored them and they worked for Company A, even if it's for one day. You know, we're looking at a lot of layoffs these days, which are you know, bringing

up different types of nuanced problems. But as long as they worked for company A, they can move to company BCDEFG as many times as they want without being in the lottery. But only up to six years in total. And there are people in the US who have been on H one b's for much longer than six years, but only if some technical steps have been taken towards the cards.

Speaker 2

So okay, let's go over that then. So when they're six years is up, for example, what's the process for them to be able to remain in the United States for a longer period and continue to work.

Speaker 1

Yeah. Really, this is something that employers struggle with because planning has to happen way in advance of the six years. Okay, in the don't have to necessarily test the market. You're making the wage promise and you're having certain compliance issues, but you're not testing the market because it's a temporary position. But if you are going to sponsor that person for a permanent position, you have to test the market to ensure that no American worker has been left out before

you offer that job for a foreign worker. Now, to test the market, there are many steps that have to be taken. First, you have to ensure or the Department of Labor believes that this is the right wage job. So you have apply and Department of Labor might take eight nine to twelve months give permission on that wage. Then in your local area with the main newspaper of

that area, including three other ways of advertising. So the government wants to see that you've made a bona fide effort, a real effort to advertise the position, and that has to be advertised for at least thirty days, and then you have to wait thirty days to applications. Now, if somebody applies for the job who has the minimum experience required, the employer cannot move forward with the application unless he hires this person or they hire this person and continue

with the other position. So if you've tested the market and somebody exists, you can't go forward with that application.

Speaker 2

And so there you can't go forward with the H one B application.

Speaker 1

Not the H one B. It's called a permanent labor certification, a permanent.

Speaker 2

Application, ah, got it.

Speaker 1

And so there are many steps that the employer has to take to test the market before they can make that permanent application.

Speaker 2

Okay, so they can't they can't convert this into a permanent status of work unless they can prove that, yeah, we literally couldn't find any other candidate in the marketplace to fill the position.

Speaker 1

That's correct. That's correct, And when that application gets to it has many steps, many different timelines, and many different points of potential failure.

Speaker 2

Okay, so, so how soon should should an employee a non employe, I'm sorry, an employer, I mean, how soon should an employer be taking these necessary steps to make sure that they're doing the right thing before they get to the point of that person or that said employee they're H one expiring.

Speaker 1

Really great question, George B. A lot of employers will wait until the first three years have gone by, and then they'll start thinking about it. Because if the green card application, the permanent labor certification application has not been pending for one year or more, they cannot extend the H one B beyond the six years. So there's a lot of counting back and counting forwards to see when

you do these steps. And because it's very complicated and not cheap, the process is expensive, employers don't necessarily want to do this until they have to. But there are a lot of employees chainly start the process as soon as the H one B application has been approved because they know all of these steps will take time, and

often these timelines can't be controlled. So for example, when during the first Trump presidency, everything was backlogged significantly and it took four years for the Biden administration to reduce timelines in various different application processes. And so employers have to be mindful that these timelines can can change and go back and forth. And this is not just the timeline, this is just the processing to get the green card.

That's a different type of calculation and an assessment altogether. If you're from India, China, Philippines, Mexico, the waiting time for people born in these countries is signif longer for people who than people who are born in a or somewhere in Europe.

Speaker 2

Can you repeat that? It kind of dropped, So people born in India, Mexico, you know, basically China or China, Okay, so longer period for them than it would be for someone born in Canada and where else anywhere else in the world, Oh, just anywhere.

Speaker 1

Yes. What happens is the United States Green Card system has a limit every year, and the annual limit is one hundred and forty thousand Green cards each year for employment based applications?

Speaker 2

Is that total for the United States or per employer?

Speaker 1

It's a total for anybody trying to get an employment based green card. So an employer might sponsor you, you might sponsor yourself. There are one you categories in which you can do that, but they all fall under one hundred and forty thousand, which is never enough for Green card applications. And so these one hundred and forty green cards are then divided into seven percent quotas for each country in the world.

Speaker 2

Ah okay, And so if.

Speaker 1

You have a country with a large population, there's a longer waiting time because they're all fitting into the seven percent quota.

Speaker 2

So then okay, So the permanent right to work, Let's say someone gets that status, what does that do for their immigration status or here in the United States, because it sounds like you still have to go through the process of even getting a green card? What does that do for that person? And still are they then could they be considered a permanent resident? Because I'm foggy on that. So can are you able to explain that?

Speaker 1

You're asking some really fantastic questions, George? Until somebody gets their green card in their hands. They are not a

permanent resident here, got it? And you have to maintain your visa status throughout that time and that green card application with the technicalities I mentioned about certain times and certain applications unless you get to and approved what's called I one forty, where the employer has fulfilled their market testing exercise and proven to the Department of Homeland Security

saying I couldn't find somebody. I'm sponsoring Joe blog. Until somebody gets to that point, they cannot extend their H one bs for three years at a time, and a lot of people in this country are in that situation. Yeah, and so you have to have that employer continuously sponsor you for the H one B. Now, one of the scenarios, George, you might have seen over the last few years is

the technology industry has seen a lot of layoffs. And California's seen the layoffs, Washington stat has seen them over the country. People have been laving.

Speaker 2

Yeah, Google and Apple just got rid of a lot of people a couple of years ago.

Speaker 1

That's right. And it actually happened in twenty twenty five already too.

Speaker 2

It did. I didn't realize that.

Speaker 1

Yeah, it's happening, it's not necessarily hitting the news in the same way because there are so many other things that I keeping you distracted.

Speaker 2

It's a chaotic twenty twenty five right now, Oh.

Speaker 1

My gosh, so much chaos. But if you have lost that job, your H one B has gone, but also that green cut application that your employer filed has also gone.

Speaker 2

Right, So what happens to that person who because this person who's working is doing so legally right, they're legally here because their employer has sponsored them to be here, and they it's been determined that, look, we can't find anyone in the market with your skills, so we need

you here. Well, what happens to that person when they get stuck in this in between status where you know, like you said, there's only so many green cards available, right, one hundred and forty seven percent divided by seven percent among other countries, et cetera. But then what happens to that individual where they get stuck in that middle where it's like, oh, well, you know, we're kind of stuck. We can't get you the green card, or or they couldn't make it happen to where they could extend to

a permanent work status. What happens to that individual.

Speaker 1

Really complicated, And interestingly enough, I appear in a New York Times story, so if anybody is interested, they can google my name in New York Times and there's a story about some people who were laid off and what they had to do. So there are some more details in that particular article. But in essence, remember we talked

about the temporary visa and the permanent visa. Yes, the temporary visa is what allows you to remain in the United States, so one must always have if you're on a work visa or employment based in a greation system, you want to maintain status with a temporary visa, the green card application that the employer might have filed and you met that certain stage, you can keep your position in that quote unquote line. But a new employer has to go through the entire exercise all over again.

Speaker 2

A new employer so different, so that person would have to work for somebody else at that point.

Speaker 1

Yes, or I, or if if the current employer is giving you a new job because they're shuffling or restructuring within their own you know, entity and organization, they too have to file a new application. Because these permanent positions are for specific positions, there could be some slight changes to keep that green.

Speaker 2

It does sound like someone could get caught in the middle of the timing though, right, because yes, you know up to six years, as you said earlier on in h one, and even if even by year three, let's say they're already working on working on trying to get that employee to be a permanent worker status, but then there's only one hundred and forty thousand green cards. I'm just I'm just in my mind seeing where this can be an issue at times, it is an issue.

Speaker 1

All the time.

Speaker 2

Totally.

Speaker 1

You've hit the nail exactly where it matters, and that waiting time is incredibly important to understand because that gets that becomes part of the assessment of when you file somebody's green card because people from India, for example, they

there are calculations and many reports written. One if anybody's looking, you can look up Cato c Ato which is a think tank and they have done a lot of studies and so you will look in one of their reports, just google it and the reports go through a lot of different you know, methods of doing these analysis and they found that anybody in from India in this backlog, often will have to wait seventy plus years to get their green cards.

Speaker 2

Yeah that's crazy, Yeah, that's crazy. What's really really quickly though, let's let's define the difference because I wanted to know the difference also between you were talking about the categories. So what's difference between one and two? Like H one H two.

Speaker 1

Really good question. So H one B is, as I mentioned earlier, you must have a degree to do the job that that degree allows you to do, and the employer has that degree.

Speaker 2

So a degree within a particular discipline, right.

Speaker 1

Exactly, that's exactly right. And the H two B and the H two A these are seasonal visas where you don't need a degree. The H two A is essentially for agriculture. And so when you see people coming here to pick our apples, you know, potatoes, you know, get salmon for example. Picture.

Speaker 2

Yeah, I was very familiar with H two A and and and how it was used, but I was always unfamiliar with how they classify, you know, one versus two. And then there's there's there's one a.

Speaker 1

H one B is the one that we talked about, right.

Speaker 2

There is there an H one A or is it just H one there.

Speaker 1

Is you know there is H one C okay, which is the nurses. It's not something I have generally used. The HB is typically the one that is used the most, but the H three as well. So the H two A is agriculture. H two B is for seasonal, intermittent or one time work. So if you see people at.

Speaker 2

So as you said earlier that the letter denotes the type of field.

Speaker 1

That's it exactly right. So the H two B has three types seasonal work, intermittent work, or one time work. And if you look at the ski resorts, for example, they likely use the H two B. It's very commonly known that President Trump at is mar A Lago Estate uses H to B for you know a lot of the workers that come to the resort, and these are

seasonal workers, and these two have quotas. The H two B has quotas and so and the age three visa is for people training who don't have training in their home country are coming to the United States to learn a skill that they wouldn't have otherwise. But proving whether it's H two A or B or three or H one B, it's all about the paperwork. And all of the various complicated procedures. So you said you're familiar with

the H two A. There are times for it. I must have done, you know, things in advance to be able to jump into the you know, application process for the H to be or H u A. It's it's not simple, and there aren't that many lawyers who file AH to be an HUOA compared to the H one BS.

Speaker 2

Yeah, that's I mean, so there, there's there's a lot going on to what what an H one or H two visa does for somebody. And I needed I needed you to mean to explain all this because especially when you go on social media, people don't understand what they're used for. It's it's a legal right for someone to work, and there's a reason why that person's being brought in for this particular type of work, and everybody, everybody just

seems to automatically think the worst. You know, it's always a negative forever for the United States, for example, when it's not the case, but it can be a negative for the person gets stuck in the middle or gets caught in between those timelines that you were talking about.

Speaker 1

So yeah, totally, and you know, one of the reasons that there is a lot of concern is the the people who come to the United States on the H two A or H two B visa program are similar to the people who often undocumented doing this work. And so if you look at some of the agricultural workers and farm workers, you may find people who are not on actual H two visas, and that's where a lot

of the controversy it's from. But A, we don't have enough of those visas, and b there aren't enough American workers to go and do back in the sun rain, you know, on farms, and so you know, if you were to ever think about doing a follow up podcast on these issues, maybe interviewed somebody who owns a farm and will tell you they see every day.

Speaker 2

Well so, but that opens up an entirely different conversation because now we're talking about Now we're talking about not necessarily whether people want to do the jobs, is whether they want to do them for the wages being offered, and so now we're talking about competitiveness in the market.

And the other reason why people have been upset is because you know, look, there's many people who said, sure, I'll go pick cherries, for example, if it paid thirty five dollars an hour for you know, we know that's not the wage for that particular position, but that's been the argument. And so once we started outsourcing labor again,

That's why I said, this is a different conversation. And you're bringing in labor from outside while they're getting they are getting paid the wages according to the market, and what is a standard wage in the guidelines of how the government says you should pay someone for a particular position. Those positions in of themselves have been watered down and degraded to a lower pain. That is, versus if they were paying for somebody else, like you said, you know,

someone someone here. Let's just say a white guy. You know, some white guy wants to go Picturey's. You know that he's probably not gonna go do it because he doesn't he's not gonna do it for that amount of money. So I don't know if I don't know if it's an argument of whether or not people are afraid to do the work or they just don't want to do the work because they don't think it's worth what it's paying. My job, Okay, so for my business, I'll bring this up.

For example, we're in the events industry. So there's times I work with everybody. I don't care what race country you're from. You know, if you're a professional and you know your stuff, and I don't have to hold your hand, we're good. I just don't want to worry about whether or not you're getting the job done. And I have people that are extremely good at their jobs. I mean

no way more than I do, and they should. And I'm a white guy and I and I know people that are Mexican, I know people that are Indian that are all in this particular industry, and we all network with each other. We keep each other going, and we keep each other paid. But we are working hard. Okay, now, now, what I'm I'm trying to get at is all summer. I am in one hundred and five plus weather for sixteen eighteen hours every day working. I'm doing it because

I'm getting paid to do it. I'm getting paid well, and I pay everybody who works for me well because they're specialists within that that industry. But when we're talking about people in the fields, they're not treated the same. And I think that is the issue that we have, and that's why most people say, yeah, I'm not going to go pick those cherries or cut that lawn because I'm not getting paid enough for me to go out

there and sweat. And maybe we need to change the perception of how people view hard work and labor in the United States. Maybe it's just a matter of retraining people or holding the industries accountable for making the wages livable. What do you think of that?

Speaker 1

That's a really I mean, it's such a complicated mulant situation that not just America but probably other countries grapple with. It's about the industry, right, I mean, let's say you know, you're a farm owner. Let's just take an example of a farm owner and he's, you know, he's got a seasonal sort of cherry picking and he's got to make sure the cherries hit the grocery store where we're you and I are gonna go buy, you know, a pound of cherries for maybe six ninety nine. How much is

he actually making? You know that that business there's a common misconception, and there are different businesses, different issues. Okay, but what does the standard farm business make and what is the salary that's necessary to do that? Now, if they're paying thirty five dollars an hour for a particular position in which they're actually losing forty dollars an hour. How are they actually going to keep that business going. You know, it's it's very it's a very complicated situation.

We do need livable wages in this country. The Liverpool wages question comes up in childcare, in teaching, in construction. It's not related to the farm, farm workers and the farm. But the answer, you know, I don't necessarily have a good answer for you, because you know, it's just it's way it's way too complicated to go into. But I will say this to you. I have had clients who own construction companies and home care, you know, nursing homes where people are trying to get into hospice care, so

to speak. Because you know, our medical industry has its own very big problems. And so when they want to hire people for the construction industry or the you know, nursing home that he cannot find American workers. And one particular business owner said to me, to me, now, I was going to pay him exactly what he wanted. He showed up, he didn't know which side the hammer was up or down.

Speaker 2

I've seen that I've seen that.

Speaker 1

So so you're going to pay somebody, you know, a very high wage for not knowing how to do the job you just said.

Speaker 2

True, But that's also that I think that also has that also is a reflection of how our culture has changed over the years. It went from it went from being proud of working hard and using your hands to playing video games and doing other things to make a living. So that could just be generational or cultural shift versus what it used to be able to say back in the forties and fifties and so on. But I'm not

I'm not arguing. I'm just I'm just asking the question, you know what I'm saying that I think.

Speaker 1

It's a great question because these are provocative thought thought provocative issues that if we don't discuss them in an amicable, you know, loving way, how would listeners even think about it? Twice? You know? And the correlation to that is are we really developing the workforce that we need for this country? Do we have enough vocation, no training for people who can't go to our schools they can't afford, you know, the education costs that are required. Are we giving them

vocational tools and schools? You know, plumbing or becoming electician. You know, are we doing enough of that? Are we putting enough emphasis on stam education at kindergarten level so that the next generation of workforce can do the jobs that H one B workers are doing well?

Speaker 2

The other questions, are we going out of our way to make those certain positions, whether they be the hands on positions you mentioned earlier or the professional positions, or are we doing enough to make them attractive to people to want to do it? I mean, is it a marketing issue?

Speaker 1

Well, totally, it's so complex, George.

Speaker 2

What it is it is we really need.

Speaker 1

The entire society to come together and say we see a solution this way. If we don't find the solutions ourselves, and we're not invested in the solutions that we're not speaking up about what each group of people needs, we're never going to have the solution, and we're going to get railroaded by executive orders by a handful of people who have the money and power to influence everybody else and point out these are the problems, but not necessarily come up with real working solutions.

Speaker 2

Well, yeah, and the problem with the solution it needs a solutions aren't overnight then it needs a very well thought out, tested, qualified plan that needs to be put in place. And actually when that is put in place, you need to stick to it and not be distracted and go off course. And I don't think that's something that has been done. It's we seem very reactionary when it comes to when it comes to the workforce in America and to the markets in general, we're reactionary. There's

not a lot of planning really. I mean, you could argue that. Sure, in a business, you have you plan your finances, your income versus your overhead. You know, like you know your net versus your gross, et cetera, how much margin you're making on a sale bunch, your percentages of this and that, and you can go through your sales cycles versus so you know, hey, in Christmas, I know this is going to be huge for me, and then after Christmas it's gonna die down. We're gonna take

some hits because it returns and it's et cetera. Now that's just data. You're just taking all that in strapolading it and you're analyzing it and then you can make certain predictions. But are you truly truly planning for the future? Of the actual industry or the workforce down the road, because fast forward here we are. Now we're finding less and less qualified individuals in the United States to do these positions that we need.

Speaker 1

Filled totally, totally, and it's a conversation that everybody should be having. And so I'm so glad you're leading the way, and I'm trying to make sure people get to hear some of these things. It's just imperative, you know.

Speaker 2

I just I just look at things. I'm just, you know, nothing special about me, Okay, I'm just an individual that I take it in. I look at what's going on, and I'm in quisitive. I have to ask these questions. I think most people have these questions on their mind, but they don't speak out. They don't ask, they don't talk about it. They just kind of go, well, that's sad, and they sweep it under the rug and they just

keep moving on with their life. Nobody's really having these conversations except for maybe people like you, because this is what you do for a living and you see it all the time, especially when it relates to you know, immigrants and having to deal with these these work visas. So you see it first hand. But most people, most average people do not see this or even deal with this. They just rely on what's going on in social media

to tell them what's going on. And unfortunately that's not the way to go about getting your information.

Speaker 1

Yeah, but you know, love people to just think about for a second. You might not need you might not visibly be seeing the high skilled workers in your life, but the high skilled workers are behind almost everything that you're doing. If you're at the office working on Zoom, a high skilled immigrant founded Zoom. If you're on your phone using WhatsApp or Instagram, uh, these are you know, as I mentioned before, the hardware software network in your phone,

they're being managed immigrants. You know, if you go to the grocery store and you're seeing the shiny apples on the shelves, immigrants are likely picking them. If you're getting the milk seamlessly appearing on your table on your shelf, immigrants are likely milking the cow or however they operate dairy stuff. If you're finding the toilet paper in the grocery store, is because an immigrant is likely driving that truck, which you know, obviously was very very prevalent as or

exposed was exposed during the pandemic. Immigrants are actually the fabric of our society, and because it's much of it is invisible, those who are just living lives and you know, day to day doing or whatever they're doing. It's not apparent, but if we didn't have the immigrants, life would be falling apart, and that day may be coming soon. Who knows. I hope I haven't jinxed us, but it doesn't take me to jinx us. You know that the executive orders alone will do it.

Speaker 2

I think what gets a little convoluted and everything is people trying to trying to throw a blanket over the word immigrant, you know, versus those who I don't know how you want to phrase it. I know everyone does it differently, undocumented, legal, whatever, But I'm just gonna say

legal immigrants versus legal people were legally here. And I'm not sure your feelings because you see firsthand families that have to go through this, But what what how do we how do we move forward in handling those who are here illegally but are trying to be here because

they're trying to make a better life for themselves. And again, I'm I'm gonna keep the politics out of it because I know, I know that there are other conversations we had with this, to be quite honest, and I've done a lot of research that comes straight from the Border Patrols data. So I've seen it all, and I've done more than one show on this. So there's not much you can say about it that I probably wouldn't know or could tell you. But yeah, but for those who

are trying to do it the right way. And and this brings me back to a story of a friend I have who had to come to this country due to I'll just I'll just say he had to come over. Grandfather was already here, grandfather was legally here for many years. Brought his grandson over to protect him. And he's been here for a long time. He actually worked for me for a while. He went to university. He's a computer science major. He works for a utility company. Guy's brilliant,

you know, and he's going through a situation. He did it the way. He and his family did it the right way. They stuck to it the whole deal, even if in the beginning he had to just get him out to save him, right, his grandfather had to save him. But after all that time, legally. He's here illegally period, and he's trying to get his wife over here at right now. But he's battling this like no matter what

he does. He's hired multiple lawyers, he's gone through every scenario you could think of, and it just keeps getting delayed and pushed back. And it's been years and so those people, I think some people or most people these days, look at every single illegal immigrant. Ask someone who's trying to do something bad or they're a bad person. Technically, yeah, you're breaking the law, But at the same time, not every or person is here for nefarious reasons. How are

you handling that? Or in your experience, how have you seen the perception of people when it comes to that distinction of illegal versus those who are legally here or do people just not even see the difference.

Speaker 1

Well, this administration, the new one, is not just making orders about undocumented immigrants. A lot of the executive orders are affecting legal immigrants too. But coming to a very basic answer to this very complicated situation is that we need immigration reform. Oh we have not had immigration laws, comprehensive immigration laws to keep up with the modern society

that we live. In since the nineteen nineties. And now think about how many times over the world has changed and evolved, and how many you know, evolution we've had. We've you know, industrial revolution, we've had you know the Y two K now the AI globalization. The world is so much smaller. The laws have not kept up with that. In addition to that, America is part of many international treaties, including the Human Rights Convention. And you know, nobody is illegal.

They could be undocumented, but human rights are an incredibly important part of American values, and so our laws are not necessarily keeping up with what we need for this country and what we need for the future. There are jobs that need to be done in this country, and there are people who want jobs from different countries. There are people who want to just stay alive. You know, today you talk about cartels and that's a lot. That's one of the issues for some of the Latin American countries,

but other countries are going through wars. There are climate change issues that are displacing people. You know, the entire world needs to come together and find solutions. But in America, we need comprehensive immigration reform to make sure that our laws are keeping up with the times.

Speaker 2

Okay, so in your mind, what would that look like? Because if we look at it from as you said, a humanitarian standpoint, and we do need a reform, we absolutely do. It's crazy how long it takes to get things done in the system, and there's no reason anybody has to wait ten years, fifty years, seventy years. I mean, that's just stupid. It makes no sense to me. But with your statement of there's no illegal, there's just undocumented, right,

it's all about humanity. So by that statement, does that mean the entire world every country should accept everyone equally? Should it just be an open system for anyone want to just travel in and out of each country without restriction?

Speaker 1

No, I don't. I think there should be agreements between countries to make sure that there are global solutions. When's you know, climate change that is you know, wiping away you know, land for people to live in. You know, my my heritage is from Bangladesh. It's a small country next to India. It's probably going to be under the ocean in the next fifty two hundred years. Maldives might be one of those. I'm just saying there has to be both solutions. World leaders go to you know, Davos

or wherever. There has to be world solutions. But for our immedia issue, we are in America, we are at the we have borders, we are bordering Canada and Mexico. You know, there has to be solutions that come from Legypt, that take into the taken into account the values that we live by and finding common solutions. And do I have an answer? No, you know, I'm just one person who advocates for what is what I feel is right for the highest good. But the people that hold the

power can't seem to agree on anything. It's become a very divisive issue. But if we could go back to love as a source of energy in our world, that every human being deserves love, and every human being deserve a way to just live, why can't we come up with solutions that that can actually everybody and everybody does their own share. I'm not saying America should take everybody

in anybody. I'm saying that we need to have comprehensive immigration reform actually can find some solutions, and right now we have nothing. Oh sorry, it's three o'clock. I have to go this. This type of conversation can go on all day long. And so I'm so sorry I have to leave at three because I have a call coming up, but I just wanted to make sure that you knew that before we dive into something else.

Speaker 2

Right, Well, if we have to cut it off for now, we'll just have to pick up on another show if we're available.

Speaker 1

So sure, totally, totally, But you know, I so appreciate it, George, because these are the conversations that need to happen.

Speaker 2

And yeah, I mean there's there's still so much for us to talk about in regard to just immigration law and everything. But regardless, why don't you just quickly let everybody know where they can find you and whatnot. And I'm sure you and I will be talking again, I hope, and we can do this again.

Speaker 1

I would love that. I would love that. Well, George, thank you so much for having me. If they want to connect with LinkedIn, you can find me there to Mina Watson, and my website at my law firm is what immigration Law dot com. And I am an author. Thank you for mentioning mentioning that My author page is Tamina Watson dot com. And I have a couple of podcasts that are all you can't you can't miss me, you know, just google me or find me.

Speaker 2

Okay, all right, well, thanks for your time and again, let's let's please do this again. I think we have to pick up and do this again and just have yes, just for this conversation.

Speaker 1

It's good. Okay, that sounds good. Thank you again, George for finding me. Take care.

Speaker 2

Yeah, thanks, okay, thanks, thank you for listening. And I hope you found that conversation informative. Please like, subscribe and share the show with others, and don't forget to turn on notifications for world Ablaze. Also visit us at our website world Ablaze podcast dot com and you could buy me a coffee as well. That link is also on our website. Have a great day.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android