Claire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what? - podcast episode cover

Claire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what?

Apr 27, 20251 hr 34 minEp. 130
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

In this episode Claire gives a summary of the submissions to the Senate Committee's inquiry into the Quality of governance at Australian higher education providers.

During the episode Claire references her interview in episode 123 with NTEU representatives Emily Foley and Tony Williams about their experiences working as casual academics in Australian universities.

The submissions to the Senate Committee's inquiry can all be read and downloaded from the inquiry webpage: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Education_and_Employment/UniversityGovernance/Submissions

The SuperFriend data mentioned in the episode is at: https://www.superfriend.com.au/research/workplace-mental-health-statistics

And Claire forgot to include the submission number for Prof. Gavin Nicholson's submission - it's number 21.

Contact Claire:


The ‘What now? What next?’ podcast recognises Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as Australia’s traditional custodians. In the spirit of reconciliation we are proud to recommend John Briggs Consulting as a leader in Reconciliation and Indigenous engagement. To find out more go to www.johnbriggs.net.au

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Claire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what? | What now? What next? Insights into Australia's tertiary education sector podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast