Welcome.
It is verdict with Center, Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with you and Senator it seems to be a whole other explosion of anti American rhetoric and many Americans now that are saying around the country that they're supporting Hamas and Palestinians over Israel altogether.
Well, that's right.
It's really a growing trend of anti Israel pro Hamas protests in many instances, anti American protests. We're seeing them in Dearborn, Michigan, We're seeing them in the United States Senate, and sadly and in today's Democrat Party they're unable to distance themselves or condemn them, because more and more it's the heart of the Democrat Party. We're going to talk
about that in depth on today's pod. We're also going to get into a really stunning expose of NPR that came out from a senior journalist at NPR who described the pervasive media bias, the dishonesty, the propagandizing that NPR does on the taxpayer's dime, and it really is revealing of what is happened to a corporate media. We're going to get into that in depth.
Yeah, it's going to be very interesting for people to hear that exactly what's going on and what he had to say, kind of whistleblowing on NPR. In essence, I want to tell you about my friends at Patriot Mobile. If you're like me and you are sick and tired of giving your money to woke companies, you've got to make the switch to Patriot Mobile. Don't give your money to companies that are fighting against your values, fighting against
your conservative values, fighting against your Christian values. And that is exactly why I switch to Patriot Mobile. They are the only American Christian conservative wireless provider. And when I say only, I mean it now. Patriot Mobile is actually fighting for the causes.
You believe in.
They take a portion of your bill every month and no charge to you, and they actually stand with organizations that support free speech, religious freedom, support the sanctity of life, our Second Amendment, as well as supporting our military, our veterans, our first responder heroes, and our wounded warriors. Now why
is that such an important point? Well, you may not realize that a big mobile gives massive donation to places like Planned Parenthood and the Democratic causes and organizations and candidates running at the local, state and the national level.
So if you don't want.
Your money going to support the left, then get away from companies that support them and switch your cell phone right now to Patriot Mobile. If you have a small business or you've got multiple lines, they have a group that deals with just switching over small.
Businesses as well.
They have one hundred percent US based customer service team and to make switching so easy, you keep your same number, keep your same cell phone you've got, or upgrade if you want to. Their team will also find you the best plan for your needs and save you cash. Go right now and get free activation by using the promo
code verdict. Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict is a website that's Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict or just call them nine seven to two Patriot join me, make the switch today, nine seven to two Patriot promo code verdict Get free activation nine seven to two Patriot. All right, Senator, I want to talk about what this trend is, and it
is one that is not going away. Of these pro hamas protesters and protests that are happening all over the country, it seems to be organized and it seems that this is really a part of the Democratic Party now and part of their apparatus.
Well, it's getting much much worse. We saw in this past week a huge protest in Dearborn, Michigan. Dearborn, Michigan has the largest Muslim population in the country. Unfortunately, it has a very high population of radicals there. And this was a rally they were having. It was an anti Israel rally where they were chanting death to Israel, and they were chanting death to America. And this is really stunning. This is in America. These are presumably Americans, or at
least they're living here. We don't know if they're here legally or not. But here give a listen to some of what they were saying at this anti American.
RALLYDD Malcolm X said, and I quote, we live in one of the rotten his countries that has ever existed on this earth. It's not genocide, Joe, that has to go. It's the entire system that has to go. Any system that would allow such atrocities and such devilry to happen and would support it, such a system does not deserve to exist on God's Earth.
Centered.
Not only were these anti Israel activists heard chanting death to America. They were also chanting death to Israel and saying that we don't have a right to exist and we're the worst country the world. We should be wiped off the face of the earth. This is happening in Michigan.
Sadly, that's exactly right. The person speaking there is dearborn activist to Wreck Bazi, who has told the crowd quote that the chant death to Israel has become the most logical chant across the world today. And he went on to explain, he said, Imam Komani, the Ayatola who declared international Alcud's day, this is what he would say to pour all of your chance and all of your shots upon the head of America.
And by the.
Way, he's saying that about the former Iranian Ayatola, as chance of death to America started from the crowd. And and at that point it's it's this is when when he says it's not genocide Joe that has to go, it's the entire system that has.
To go, and he goes on to side.
It's not only that, it's the fact that he also is sitting there in the greatest country world saying this and the cameras are catching it while he is saying that America should cease to exist, and this is happening. A democratic representative, she leaves an area where she represents, and she will not come out and condemn this either.
Yeah.
No, that's exactly right. And if you listen to what else, uh, this activist said at the rally, He said, any that would allow such atrocities and such devilry to happen and would support it, such a system does not deserve to exist on God's earth. So he's saying the American government does not deserve to exist on God's earth. He goes on to say, quote, so when these fools ask us, ask us if Israel has a right to exist, the chant death to Israel has become the most logical chant
across the world today. And at that point his supporters began cheering a chanting death to Israel, Death to Israel. This is who these radicals are. And as you noted, Rashida Telib is an elected member of Congress. She is a member of the United States House of Representatives. She was asked what she thought about radicals, radicals who support her chanting death to America and listen to her response the.
Leipox News, I don't talk to Fox shot.
At a rally in your district, people were chanting death to America.
Do you condemn not talk to Fox News? Do you condemn chance of death to America?
I don't talk to people that use racist tropes.
Why can't you.
Just say whether or not you condemn people chanting death to Why.
Are you afraid to talk to Fox News?
Is not not listen using racist tropes, where as my community.
Is what Fox chooses about. And I don't talk to Fox News Death to America racist?
Fox News is chanting death to America racist, talking.
About your guys racist tropes. You know, you guys know exactly what you do.
I know you're flummable, but you guys got to go deal with.
Me on your own self.
Not gonna use me there.
It is Representative Rashid to leave saying she will not condemn death to America. Chance because Fox News was asking her is the excuse, which I think really comes back to what she believes.
Sadly, this is more and more the entire Democrat Party. The terrifying thing is the people screaming death to America. The people screaming death is Yes, that's the base of Rashida Telib that's who elected her. Yes, that's the base of AOC. Yes, that's the base of Ilhan Omar, that's the base of the squad. But understand, it's not just them. That's who Chuck Schumer is listening to. That's who Joe Biden is listening to. That's who Nancy Pelosi is listening to.
That's the thing that's really frightening. You look at these extreme fringes. They are driving the so called mainstream of the Democrat Party. It was Chuck Schumer who demanded Benjamin att Yahoo be thrown out of office. It was Joe Biden who led a resolution in the UN effectively condemning Israel. It was Nancy Pelosi who signed a letter demanding that we cut off military funding to Israel. And you know
why they're doing it. They're doing it because of the angry mobs chanting death to America and death to Israel.
So there's also another part of this.
It's a really weird dynamic, and that is how the Democrats are allowing so much of this rhetoric to make it into the halls. In Congress, you had gaza protesters repeatedly interrupted the Senate hearing with Pentagon leaders, and it doesn't seem to be condemned by the leadership who are in charge.
On the Senate side.
You also had protesters shouting at senators saying that the Senate can't eat until Gaza eats, blocking the cafeteria so that in theory centers wouldn't be able to eat. They were doing this while they were blocking the hallways and going into the cafeteria. Take a listen to these chants again in the hallways of Congress. I mean, they have completely infiltrated the Senate this week with some of these protests.
And yet you don't see any of the leaders saying, hey, you guys can't stop the business of the American people.
They're letting them basically run the show.
Yeah, no, that's exactly right. They're shouting down hearings and and and I want you to play the audio of what they did in the Senate cafeteria. Now I will know the Senate cafeteria is actually not senators. It's not where where members eats, but it's it's where Senate staff he eats. And and so there are lots of Senate staffers that are down there. It's where they go get get lunch
most most days. And a bunch of pro Hamas protesters came in chanting, and and take a listen to this, because this is happening, and and and it's being allowed to just shut things down. And by the way, this is not outside on the public streets. You can have protests on the public streets. This is inside of of of the capitol office buildings, inside of the cafeteria, and and and it's being allowed by by Senate leadership because these are their base and so give it.
Give a listen.
Now, Senator, I just got to ask did you eat, because they said you weren't gonna eat.
Yeah, I actually ate. And where they were is not actually where senators eat. I'm not aware of whether staff was stopped from eating or not, but they said that you And by the way, look at look at the end they said, they said, restore aid to unra Unras. Of course, the UN agency that it's now been reported, had multiple Hamos Terrists working for it that actually participated in the October seventh mass murder. These people call themselves Christians for Palestine. You know what, I don't know of
any Christians who excuse mass murder. I don't know of any Christians who excuse mass rape. The idea that they pretend to wrap themselves in faith while demonstrating the absolute evil barbarism.
Listen.
I have watched the videos, and I got to say when I talked to these young lefties who are so ignorant, they're so sure of what they think, and they don't know a damn thing. I've watched the videos. I saw one hundred and thirty eight people being murdered. I've seen the photographs where these monsters that they raped little girls, they raped women, They cut off their breasts, they cut off their genitals, they burned them, they penetrated them with knives and foreign objects.
It is grotesque and evil.
And the fact that they're in there feeling all self righteous on behalf of those terrorists, I really don't have words to speak.
And listen.
Part of having judgment is recognizing the difference between good and evil, and the Hamas terrorists who carried out October seventh are the embodiment of evil. And what are those guys chanting give money to unrupt which included those Hamas terrorists. That is the phrase, useful idiots doesn't even begin to cover that.
There's also I think a second phase that is happening, and it seems to be, as I mentioned earlier, organized around the country. But ABC News had to report that there were bags with anti Semitic messages as well as unidentified substances found on cars and buildings in Lincoln Park. The Chicago Police say they're investigating this after these dozens of anti semic messages were found on cars and on buildings,
and it's not the first time. Lingonpart residents that woke up this week that saw this disturbing imidst these zipwoc bags containing these anti semic messages and what appears to be a clear escalation this is from ABC seven, and an unidentified substance that some believe may have been rat poison. On every doorstep coming up the street, there were these bags. I picked up a few of them, one of the people in the neighborhood said, and was horrified to see
what they were. And of course my four year old was, Mommy, what is that. It just broke my heart. I didn't know what to tell him, said one of the local residents. And this was in an area where there are a lot of Jewish people that live sadly. We're seeing this across the country. We're seeing this in Jewish neighborhoods. We're seeing this in New York City, We're seeing this in Chicago. We're seeing this all across the country. And we're seeing
this especially on university campuses. And I have to say, many of the campus administrators are not willing to act to protect their Jewish student. I will tell you been one of the saddest things. I've talked with many of my friends who are Jewish who have kids who are in college, and over and over and over again, they've reported that their kids are afraid for their physical safety.
That's not right.
Look, it is any university's obligation to protect the safety of every one of their students. And the fact that there are so many Jewish students facing threats of violence, facing harassment, facing vicious anti Semitism, with the college campuses, the administrators, and the protesters at a minimum turning a blind eye to it, in many ways, tacitly or even explicitly agreeing with it, it is a sign of an enormous
corruption that has just infiltrated the Left in a way. Look, I would actually like a strong and vibrant Democrat Party. I think it's good for our country. It's good for our democratic process to have two healthy parties where you have real and substance of debate. We don't have that right now. The Democrat Party is becoming radicalized at a
level that that is dangerous. And I will tell you as I travel Texas, I do with some regularity encounter people who tell me, they say, listen, I was a Democrat. I used to be a Democrat. And I'm seeing this, this anti Israel hate. I'm seeing this anti Semitism, and I can't support a party that that that welcomes and supports that. That is really bad for the country and really bad for the Democrat Party. And I wonder are there any Democrats with the courage to speak out against it.
We've seen John Fetterman, and in many ways, the fact that John Fetterman is doing so it stands out because nobody else is. Is there not one other election Democrat?
Yes? No, no, Look, God bless John Fetterman. Yeah.
John Fetterman has really not bad down from him standing with Israel and has taken a lot of heat from a lot of protesters and a lot on the left that are like, wait, dude, you're supposed to be a radical leftist, what's wrong with you? Why aren't you doing this? And he has refused to back down on it. I'm glad you mentioned his name because it's important that we say job well done to people on the left that are saying I'm not going to be bullied into in supporting Jimas.
Listen, a couple of weeks ago, I went over to the Democratic cloak room where John was there, and I just said, hey, I wanted to tell you thank you. I really appreciate the courage you've shown on Israel on speaking out.
Thank you.
It matters, and I recognize it's not easy, it's not without costs, and I will say, look, to his credit, he viewed it as various matter of fact. He's just like, it's the right thing to do, and I respect that. It is not what I anticipated. And you know what's sad, Bennett.
It shouldn't be alone. I mean, in any normal world, you and I should be listing a dozen Democrats that have the courage to denounce the radical screaming death to America, that have the courage to stand up and say no, we stand with Israel that have the courage to say, you know, there is a difference. There is a moral difference. There is a fundamental difference between psychotic, genocidal terrorists who are murdering civilians, who are raping little girls, who are
murdering women, who are desecrating corpses. There is a fundamental difference between that and the IDF Israeli defense forces that are defending civilians and killing terrorists. They are not the same, They're not morally equivalent. And I can tell you one Democrat saying that, John Federman, to be honest, I don't have a second name, I can tell you right now.
Yeah, And that tells you about the Democratic Party. And also, I think the messaging from the White House, they've gotten really silent on supporting Israel, really silent on standing up on these issues. And yeah, the White House was asked about this, It's like, yeah, of course people shouldn't be saying death to America.
That's a no brainer.
But the fact that more Democrats are not willing to come out and say the same thing is truly shocking. I want to tell you real quick, out our friends over at Freedom Gold. There are a lot of gold and silver companies out there, and you want to make sure that you find one that you can trust, and you want to make sure that you're working with a company that understands what diversification means. It means diversifying your portfolio. Gold and silver are important, but they shouldn't be all
of what you're doing. And there are some companies out there, a lot of them. They'll be like, no, no, you need to put everything gold. That is not what Freedom Gold USA does. The other thing is this, they charge on average twenty five to thirty percent less than most major gold firms. That is massive, twenty five to thirty percent less.
Because there's others.
That work just on fear mongering and then all of a sudden, you don't even know what you did.
That is not what Freedom Gold does.
Freedom Gold USA will talk to you about diversifying your retirement portfolio. Families know what's tapping right now, they know what it costs. Sixty dollars is not what it used to be. Now it's sixty dollars just to go get fast.
Food for a family of four.
And we've seen inflation tick up again and what happen, Well, gold is now hitting new record highs. That is why it's time for you to take a look at gold and silver. Sit down with people that can explain to you about how you can allocate a portion of your retirement funds into gold and silver to help you protect against inflation. It is a good hedge against inflation historically and a great way to protect and preserve your hard earned retirement nest Egg go right now to FREEDOMGOLDUSA dot
com slash verdict. That's Freedomgold Usa dot com slash verdict, or you can call them the number one eight hundred sixty five five eight eight four to three. On average they charge twenty five to thirty percent less and most major gold firms. That's another reason why you should call them right now one eight hundred sixty five five eight eight four to three. That's one eight hundred sixty five five eight eight four to three, and ask them about
getting free silver in your account today. That's twenty eight hundred sixty foy five eight eight four to three.
Center.
There was another story that broke, and this is one that is for a guy that has spent my entire career in media, NPR annoys me beyond a level of frustration that most people can imagine because I don't understand why my tax dollars are subsidizing a hardcore leftist organization and why I'm paying their salaries at NPR, that's the reality.
But now we've got a guy that was there for twenty five years who has blown the whistle on NPR saying that basically, when Donald Trump was elected, it completely broke in PR and they are there every day to take down conservatives, take down Trump, take down anybody like him, and our tax dollars are going to pay for MPR.
No, that's exactly right, And this story is a big deal because this is, as you noted, a whistleblower who came clean and really wanted to describe what was happening in a major media institution, one of the most important media institutions of the country. And so the individual in question is a guy named Uri Berliner, who was a
twenty five year veteran of NPR. He was a senior business or editor at NPR, and he wrote a column on the Free Press that came out April ninth, and I actually want to read from a good chunk of it because I think it's important what he said, and it is very much whistleblowing. So here's how he starts quote. You know the stereotype of the NPR listener, an ev driving, wordle playing, tote, back bag carrying, coastal elite. It doesn't
precisely describe me, but it's not far off. I'm Sarah Lawrence, educated, was raised by a lesbian peace activist mother. I drive a Subaru, and Spotify says my listening habits are most similar to people in Berkeley. I fit the NPR mold. I'll cop to that. So when I got a job there twenty five years ago, I never looked back. As a senior editor on the businessiness desk, where news is always breaking, We've covered upheavels in the workplace, super market prices,
social media, and AI. It's true that NPR always had a liberal bent, but during most of my tenure here, an open minded, curious culture prevailed. We were nerdy, but not knee jerk activist or scolding. In recent years, however, that has changed. Today, those who listened to NPR or read its coverage online find something different, the distilled worldview
of a very small segment of the US population. If you are conservative, you will read this and say, duh, it's always been this way, but it hasn't For decades. Since its founding in nineteen seventy, a wide swath of America tuned into NPR for reliable journalism and gorgeous audio pieces with birds singing in the Amazon. Millions came to us for conversations that exposed us to voices around the country, the world radically different from our own, engaging precisely because
they were unguarded and unpredictable. No image generated more pride within an NPR than the farmer listening to Morning Edition from his or her tractor at sunrise. Back in twenty eleven, although NPR's audience tilted a bit to the left, it still bore a resemblance to America at large. Twenty six percent of listeners described themselves as conservative, twenty three percent as middle of the road, and thirty seven percent as liberal.
By twenty twenty three, the picture was completely different. Only eleven percent described themselves as very or even somewhat conservative, twenty one percent as middle of the road, and sixty seven percent of listeners said they were very or somewhat liberal. We weren't just losing conservatives, we were also losing moderates and traditional liberals. An open minded spirit no longer exists within NPR, and now, predictably, we don't have an audience
that reflects America. That wouldn't be a problem for an openly polemical news outlet serving a niche audience, but for NPR, which purports to consider all things, it's devastating both for its journalism and its business model.
You listen to that, and it's a guy that's almost like he's coming clean, realizing just how damaging what NPR is doing to the country, and he's in paving it.
Yeah, he's in pain.
He also did an interview he set down talking about this, and I want you to hear what he had to say on honestly with Barry Rice.
Take a listen to this.
Everyone knew that NPR had a liberal bent. It was like saying these days, like Fox has a conservative bent. That was obvious to anyone. But you argue that it's really gone from having a liberal bent or a liberal shading, to really a bias. Here's one thing you write in your essay. You write for the majority of your time at NPR, despite the liberal bend, an open minded, curious culture prevailed we were nerdy, but not knee jerk activists
or scolding ori. When did that start to change? When did the thing that everyone sort of recognized as sort of a liberal bias start to shift into something harder than that until what you call a knee jerk activist and even scolding quality.
Well, I think it was a accumulative I don't think it was one event. I mean, I think part of it was Trump's election. You know, I think, like every newsroom, every Legacy meeting, is when we were shocked, disturbed, distraught, really troubled. We assumed Hillary Clinton was going to win and she didn't, and it was really an unsettling experience. But I also think to me it revealed that we didn't really understand a lot of what was going on
in America, that we were out of touch. But I think also we kind of locked down after a while. I think for a while we started covering Trump in a way that that, like a lot of the Legacy news news organization, that we were trying to damage his presidency to even it's flying, anything we could to harm him. And I think what we latched onto was Russia collusion. Like a lot of news organizations which was, as I write, sort of catnip. Although it was just rumors and a
lot of it based on pretty shoddy documents. Evidence there wasn't It wasn't really solid, but I think it was. It was compelling and for us, you know, I think a lot of newspapers you know, used documents or anonymous sources. We really latched onto Adam Schiff. He was like our muse to the Trump collusion story. We had him on
constantly a lot. I think I counted twenty five times, you know, and in most of those conversations he sort of alluded to evidence he may have had or sort of teased out, yeah, Russia, you know, he was coluding or the campaign was colluding with Russia. And then the Muller report came out and no collusion, and you know, I think we sort of went to sort of the story kind of disappeared. But to me, that was like a time for like what went wrong? Why did we
miss this? Like, you know, despite our feelings about Trump, this is a story we should have sort of treated differently.
You hear him say that they he said they were trying to harm Trump. Now that is shocking for him to say this because in translation center.
That means and stop, stop and repeat that for a second. Stop and stop and repeat that for a second. This is a senior editor at NPR. Mind you, they're finding funded by US taxpayer dollars, and he is admitting the entire institution and his words, was trying to harm Trump. I mean, that is a damning admission. And at some level, as he noted in what I read a minute ago, it was obvious to any conservative, but it says something for a senior editor to go and blow the whistle like this.
This NPR reminds me of Twitter before Elon Musk bought it in many ways, where it's bloated, it's out of control, it's activism. It's not run like a business because it's subsidized by government taxpayers.
I'm fine with MPR existing center.
They should figure out how to do it the same way that everybody else does in media, which is to make money instead of us giving them our tax dollars to them, as he described it, try to hurt Trump every time they could, and it won't just be Trump in the future, it will be any other conservative based on what he's saying.
It's not like they just went in against Trump. And that was it.
They're going in against every conservative on every story out there.
Yeah, let me focus on two other segments of what Uriberliner wrote. Quote, concerned by the lack of viewpoint diversity, I looked at voter registration for our newsroom in DC, where NPR is headquartered and many of us live. I found eighty seven registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans.
None.
Now, that's not vague or ambiguous, that's not equivocal. That is explicit. Let me read this other segment.
Quote.
In October twenty twenty, the New York Post published the explosive report about the laptop hunter Biden abandoned at a Delaware computer shop, containing emails about a sordid business deals. With the election only weeks away, NPR turned a blind eye. Here's how NPR's managing editor for News at the time explained the thinking, quote, we don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don't want to waste our listeners and readers' times on
stories that are just pure distractions. But it wasn't a pure distraction or product of Russian disinformation, as dozens of former and current intelligence officials suggested the laptop did belong to Hunter Biden, its contents revealed his connection to the corrupt world of multimillion dollar influence peddling and its possible implications for his father. The laptop was newsworthy, but the timeless journalistic instinct of following a hot story lead was
being squelched. During a meeting with colleagues I listened as one of NPR's best and most fair minded journalists said it was good we weren't following the laptop story because it could help Trump. When the essential facts of the post reportings were confirmed and the emails verified independently about a year and a half later, we could have fessed up to our misjudgment, but like Russia collusion, we didn't make the hard choice of transparency.
Why fix it if it's your ideology, right, If this is what the ideology is, and it's being funded by taxpayers, why stop?
Which brings me to my final question on this.
I've heard about this, and we've talked about this for I hate to say it.
Twenty years.
How on earth are they getting this type of government funding, especially now if we know this from someone that worked there for twenty five years.
Is there any way to say the NPR. That's fine.
If this is what your mission is, go and do it, but you're not going to do it subsidized by taxpayers.
Listen, I would eliminate the funding for NPR tomorrow. That's the right thing to do. We shouldn't be in the business of funding NPR. The problem is every Democrat wants to spend your taxpayer dollars funding NPR because why wouldn't you if you're a leftist, why wouldn't you be willing to to use taxpayer dollars to fund a propaganda outlet for your view? And I got to tell you in the budget battles, too many Republicans are scared of taking
on NPR, and so between the two it keeps going. Look, I actually think it speaks volume that where Uri Berliner wrote this was the free Press. The Free Press was started by Barry Weiss. Berry Weiss resigned from the editorial board of The New York Times and wrote a letter. If you haven't read the letter, we may do a podcast where we just read the letter, because it's something I actually think should be taught in every journalism class in America. It is a letter where and listen Bury,
by our own description is left of center. She's a liberal Democrat or voter for Obama twice, but she was horrified. And actually Barry's resignation letter reads very much like Urie Berliner's article. They are both people left of center who actually believe in some modicum of free speech, some modicum of fairness, and they look at the corruption of institutions
they respected. I look at Uriy Berlinner, and I'm reminded of John F. Kennedy's famous speech at the Berlin wall Ick ben I and Berliner, which which he thought meant that that that he was a Berliner, a resident of Berlin, but actually it was poorly translated German. And what the better translation was is I am a jelly donut, which which was not JFK's finest moment. But nonetheless I feel
the same sentiments. Urray Berlinner and I may disagree on a lot of things, but I'm proud to stand with Ariray Berlinner for daring to speak the truth, because free speech matters, and I actually think it matters. I met recently with the CEO of a major journalistic enterprise. I won't say who it is, and I told him, I said, listen,
I actually believe in a free press. I defend you even when you kick the crap out of me, even when you attack me, because I think it's in I's portant to democracy and free speech to have a real and vibrant press. But when you guys are just corrupt ideologues, when you're just propagandists, it hurts the entire country. And so I give a big shout out to Urib Berliner, like Barry Weiss, on whose platform he wrote this, There are a handful of liberals, and I actually want to
call out Listen. I don't know that many fair minded liberals in the media listen to Verdict, although we're close to a million listeners, so maybe there are. If you're a fair minded liberal working in the media and you don't like the bias and propaganda, and I'm not saying you're suddenly conservative and a right winger, that's.
Okay, that's okay.
We can have reasonable discussions. But when people speak out like Urie Berliner and Barry Weiss, it makes a difference, and we need more people to do that.
Yeah, definitely, don't forget.
We do this show Monday Wednesday, and Friday we have our week in review. If you miss anything during the week, we put those stories together for you on Saturdays as well. Make sure you hit that subscribe, follow, or auto download button, depending on where you're listening to this. You also say hey, Siria Alexa, play Verdict and with Ted Cruz and it
will play it. And on those in between dates, make sure you grab my podcast, the Ben Ferguson Podcasts wherever you get your podcasts, and then Senator and I will see you back here for a Week in Review tomorrow