Laken Riley Trial Begins, Detailing Her Horrifying Murder, plus Dems Brazenly Trying to STEAL Pennsylvania Senate Election - podcast episode cover

Laken Riley Trial Begins, Detailing Her Horrifying Murder, plus Dems Brazenly Trying to STEAL Pennsylvania Senate Election

Nov 18, 202434 minEp. 465
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

Transcript

Speaker 1

Welcome.

Speaker 2

It is verdict with Senator Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with you and Senator it is a big fight right now for this country and what's going to happen early on on border security. There are concerns that there's going to be a major surge of illegal immigrants coming across the border, and there's also the reality that there's still serious crimes that are happening, including some high profile trials that are going on right now.

Speaker 3

Well right now, the Lake and Riley trial is unfolding, and there was no issue more front and center in this election than the invasion at our southern border and Lake and Riley, as much as anybody came to signify what the stakes are and the tragic circumstances that unfolded in Georgia with Lake and Riley. They horrified the country, and we're seeing the testimony of exactly what happened that's

going to end, that is going to end. On January twentieth, we are days away from the border being we're going to talk about lakeln Riley, We're going to talk about what's going to happen to finally, finally, finally secure the border. We're also seeing ironically the Democrats shamelessly trying to steal an election in Pennsylvania. I say ironically because the Democrats prattled on for two years about how they're the party that's defending democracy, and yet they are right now in

Pennsylvania trying to steal the Senate race. They are defying the orders of the state Supreme Court. We're going to walk through that as well. And finally we're going to talk about the Democrats in the wake of the election. They have a solution, They have an answer for how to solve their problems with the voters, and their answer is censorship. They want to silence any criticism. They want to ensure that no one can ever disagree with them. We're going to break that down to.

Speaker 2

Yeah, it's really important story. I want to talk to you real quick about the holidays. And when it comes to holidays, you want to spend time with your family. You also when you spend time with your family, you're probably thinking about making sure that they are safe. Well, there is one gift you may want to put on your list this Christmas, and it is a gift especially for loved ones that maybe aren't old enough to carry a firearm yet. Or maybe don't feel comfortable. I want

you to know about BURNA. BURNA is an incredible option to protect yourself and put distance between you and a threat like never before, much more than you can with pepper spray or with a taser. A burna less lethal pistol launcher is truly amazing. Now I have them, and I've got them for multiple family members. Now it is a great compliment by the way to owning a firearm. And if your family is in a situation where you feel threatened or they feel threatened, and you can start

with less lethal, this is the way to go. It is legal in all fifty states. There are no permits or background checks needed. Now the best part about this is its easy use by all ages eighteen and older. The burner launcher has powerful deterrence like pepper spray, tear gas, and kinetic rounds. With a sixty foot range, one shot can incapacitate and attacker for up to forty minutes. It is used by government agencies and law enforcing around the country and more than a half million of these have

been sold. They also have more than fourteen thousand, four and a half star reviews. Now, I want you to go see how this works, and once you see it, you're going to be like, I need that. And there's so many my family members, So whether it's a grandson, a granddaughter, maybe someone that went off to school, your wife, your mother, maybe they don't feel comfortable carrying a firearm. Berna is another phenomenal option. And I want to save

you money. Visit burna dot com slash verdict. That's Burnaby RNA dot com slash verdict for ten percent off your purchase. That's by RNA dot com slash verdict for ten percent off. You can also see the videos there of how it works and you'll understand how important this is. BYRNA dot

com slash verdict. Senator, Let's start with this trial. As the audio from this trial came out, I was in New York City on set it Outnumbered right when they went live, and the nine to one one call as well as the bodycam audio from the officer was stunning.

Speaker 1

It was shocking. It made me angry.

Speaker 2

It made everybody on set just furious and so sad that Lake and Riley fought for eighteen minutes to try to save her life. This is a situation that never should have happened because this person should have never been in the United States of America, and it was because of the Biden Harris policies that this monster was able to take her life.

Speaker 3

Well, that's exactly right. And it was heartbreaking as lake and Riley's mom wept in court listening to the nine one one call eighteen minutes, eighteen minutes that Lake and Riley fought. She fought, she fought to avoid being raped, she fought for her life, and tragically, at the end, this this monster, this murderer, bashed her head in with a rock and it's horrific and it's preventable. What is so so infuriating is that this should never have happened.

And I want you to I want you to listen to Bill Malugin from Fox reporting on the opening statements of the trial that really laid out the tragedy of what unfolded. Dana.

Speaker 4

It was really hard to listen to that opening statement from the prosecutor, the condition that Lake and Riley's body was found, in the fact that her garment watch tracked the very moment her heart stopped, I can only imagine being her family. I think this just shows why we as in network made it such a priority to cover

the border so much these last few years. These mass catch and release policies, they have consequences, real world consequences that affect real people, particularly when it comes to the

mass catching release of Venezuelan men. I mean, how many live shots were we doing together in twenty twenty two to twenty twenty three, hundreds of them in Eagle Pass in El Paso, watching these lines of hundreds of upon hundreds of Venezuelan men just walking into the country, single file every day, not running, not hiding, very nonchalant because they knew they were going to be released into the country with a court date potentially years away. And the

problem with that is you can't vet Venezuelan men. Venezuela does not cooperate with the US. We have no database, no records to run their names against. So what you're listening to right now with this horrible case with Lake

and Riley, unfortunately it's not even an isolated incident. What happened just a few months later, Joscelyn Nungary was murdered in Houston, A twelve year old girl allegedly sexually assaulted and murdered at the hands of two Venezuelan illegal aliens who have been caught and released at.

Speaker 1

The Texas border just weeks prior. Sound familiar.

Speaker 4

Unfortunately, It's been happening all over the country, whether it's frend de Aragua setting up footholds across the country, migrant crime happening in different cities across the country. The idea that what happens at the border stays at the border ended a long time ago. You look at Rachel Morin, she was murdered in Maryland. You look at lakeln Riley, that happened in Georgia. Joscelyn Nunger eight was in Houston.

These catch and release policies affect the entire country. And say what you want about Donald Trump and the way he campaigns, but at his rallies, he wasn't bringing celebrities up on stage. Who was he bringing up Joscelyn Nungary's mom, Rachel Morin's mom, Real people who suffered horrible, horrible, horrible consequences as a result of these catch and release policies.

Speaker 5

Listen about to you, Bill Mallision, It is interesting to imagine that you actually could have been standing right there, or Griff Jenkins could have been reporting to us on live shots as we watched people just stream across. And it's certainly possible that we were down there when he crossed over and before he came to New York. Bill Millisian, thank you so much.

Speaker 2

The question that so many people have after hearing that centater is how much longer is this going to happen? Because we're even hearing reports of surges of illegal immigrants that may be trying to get across before Donald Trump takes office. And this is because they still refuse to act at the White House.

Speaker 3

Well, Joe bud and Kamala Harris, they want every illegal alien possible to come into this country between now and January twentieth because they look at every one of them as a future Democrat voter. And you know the the trial of Lake and Riley's murderer where they played the nine one one call, They went through the timeline and one of the things Lake and Riley she wasn't killed at two in the morning. She was killed just after

nine am. She left the home her home jogging on the University of Georgia campus at nine oh three am. She was seen at nine oh five am jogging with her cell phone in her hand and then at nine eleven am, she called nine one one while running, and there was a minute long recording where you can hear a male voice, and the jury heard the operator repeating herself saying Clark County nine one one, Hello, Clark County nine one one, Can anyone hear me? The call ended

at nine to twelve am. And if you can imagine, Riley's mom listened to that in court, the suspect didn't even his face didn't move, He had no reaction as he listened to what happened. And the prosecution laid out that this murderer was quote hunting for females on the campus when he came upon Riley. And here's what the prosecutor said to the jury. She said, quote when Lake and Riley refused to be his rape victim, he bashed

her skull in with a rock repeatedly. The evidence will show that Laken fought, She fought for her life, she fought for her dignity, and in that fight, she caused this defendant to leave forensic evidence behind. She also marked her killer for the entire world to see. I've got to say the tragedy of what happened to Lake and Riley, the tragedy of what happened to Joscelyn Hungary, the tragedy of what happened to Rachel Marin, the tragedy of what has happened over and over and over again. All of

this was preventable. But we can at least take solace that we will see crimes like this begin to be prevented on January twentieth.

Speaker 2

You mentioned January the twentieth, and obviously that's coming soon, not soon enough.

Speaker 1

But is there no is there no chain.

Speaker 6

Of your colleagues that realize what this election was about in DC where they say, hey, guys, maybe we want to get ahead of this. Maybe we really really misread this with the American people. Maybe we should start now and not just allow for these open borders. Or is this just the official policy the Democratic Party that we are always open borders no matter what.

Speaker 3

So I don't know. It has not been very long since election day. We were back in session last week, so I was there with the Democrat senators. I'll tell you they're just kind of a little shell shocked. I think they're stunned by the election results. Will see if

they change. I'll tell you what I am urging. I would like to see us in January, when we get the new Congress sworn in, I'd like to see one of the very first bills that we vote on be the Justice for Joscelynak, the law that I've introduced that mandates that when illegal immigrants are detained, that they be kept in attention, that they not be released as long as there are detention facilities there for them. I'd like to see that vote early on and put every Democrat

on record, and we'll see. Maybe they look at these election results and say, Okay, we've got to change, or maybe they don't. Maybe they dig in and say we don't care and we're going to keep doing the same thing over and over again. But I think we ought to force them in January go on record. Have you listened to a word the voter said? Or are you just are you just stuck on open borders, no matter who dies, no matter who suffers, no matter who the victims.

Speaker 1

Are part of the story.

Speaker 2

And I think it's important for people to understand Lake and Riley's murderer entered the country illegally back in twenty twenty two. There's a timeline and we knew that this person was in the country illegally, and yet we kept allowing him to come back.

Speaker 5

Listen, see, I want to just remind everybody how did Jose Bera get here and how do we get to this point? So in September of twenty twenty two, he crossed illegally on the west side of Texas in El Paso. He makes his way all the way to New York and that was in September of twenty twenty three. As we've seen a pattern, arrested in New York City then, but let go makes his way down to Georgia, and in October twenty twenty three he was cited for shoplifting. Okay,

that's crime, but he's let go again. And in February of twenty twenty four, this is when he is This is the date where he is charged with the killing of Lake and Riley. So I was just looking the bigger picture, Shannon Well. Under President Trump, these are the types of numbers you're looking at for ice removals of illegal immigrants who were for whatever reason, we're in the country illegally, but also criminals that were in the country illegally.

Then you look at the Biden administration, and those are the numbers. And that's one of the reasons you see this number, Shannon, which I think is amazing, immigration being the most important issue either overall and in Georgia twenty percent eighteen. But look at the difference in twenty twenty it was three percent four percent. So something happened. I think we all know what it was, which is the change from Biden to Trump on border policy.

Speaker 1

There it is Biden and Trump on border policy.

Speaker 3

And understand that timeline ben three times this murder. And by the way, you will notice, I will not say his name, I will not say the names of any of these bastards. I'll say the names of the victims. But these bastards deserve to be forgotten. They deserve to be prosecuted and executed and utterly forgotten because they are evil what they have done to these victims. But this monster three times was apprehended, three times he was let go.

The first time he was apprehended was in twenty twenty two in El Paso, Texas, and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the Democrats let him go. Had they followed the law, then, had they put him on a plane. Had they flown them back to Venezuela, had they kept him in detention, Lake and Riley would be alive. The second time he was arrested and let Go was in New York again, New York Democratic prosecutors. He was charged with endangering the safety of a child, but let go again.

The third time he was arrested and let Go was in Georgia again, Democrat prosecutors. Over and over and over again. There is a pattern and the good news. You know, people wonder, well, well, how does this change so quickly? Why does January twentieth matter so much? Well, look, on January twentieth, we're not going to build any new wall. On January twentieth, we're not going to likely hire any new border patrol agent. So you wonder what can change so quickly? And what can change so quickly is a

simple policy decision. On January twentieth, I am absolutely certain that Donald Trump will instruct the border patrol catch and release ends. Now, if you apprehend someone, you detain them, and we deport them. And the thing to understand, not only does that mean the first step in the timeline of the Lake and Riley murderer ends, because they never

let him go in twenty twenty two. But it also means the numbers plummet because everyone who comes, they have cell phones, They call their friends, they call their family. So on January twentieth, and by the way, people are going to know this on January tenth, they're going to know this is what Trump's going to do. So it's not even going to take the phone calls. It's going to take uh oh, there's a new sheriff in town.

And we will see, mark my words. By January and February of next year, we will see the numbers plummet massively.

Speaker 2

I want to tell you about Patriot Mobile real quick. If you have a cell phone and your cell phone is with Big Mobile, you may not realize until now that you are supporting hardcore liberal causes, candidates and organizations, organizations that pay for abortions. For example, when I found that out, I did not want to be I didn't want any of my dollars going to a company that

was going to use my money for things like that. Well, about a decade ago, a group of conservatives founded a company called Patriot Mobile because they want to be on the front lines fighting for our values, for our First and our Second Amendment rights, fighting for the sanctity of life, and standing with our military, our first responders, and our

wounded warriors. Well they did that by creating an incredible cell phone company, and you can take a stand for conservative causes by switching your cell phone provider to them. Not only many times you save real money every month, but you also do this They take about five percent of your bill every month and no extra cost to you, and they give it back to conservative causes that fight for what we believe in. So you're making a difference with every phone call, with every text message, and with

every bill you pay. You also get the same nationwide coverage as the big providers because they're all now using the same networks in twenty twenty four. It is easy to switch. You can do it over the phone. I have Patriot Mobile. I travel everywhere and have no issues

with coverage. Plus they have a coverage guarantee. Now you keep your same cell phone number you have right now you can upgrade to a new phone or keep the one you have, and they have a one hundred percent US space customer service team that helps you switch easily. Go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict, and you're going to get one month of free service to the offer code verdict. That's Patriot Mobile dot Com slash verdict, or you can call them nine to seven to two

Patriot right now. That's nine seven to two Patriot right now, and get a free month when you use the offer code verdict. Join me and switch to America's only Christian conservative mobile provider Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict or nine seven to two Patriot. Get that free month of service today. Senator,

I want to move to Pennsylvania. And this has become a really big issue, especially on Sunday as this race has tightened, and there are a lot of people that just straight up saying, now at this point, the Democrats are trying to steal an election in Pennsylvania. They're looking at the Democrats trying to violate the rule of law and undermine the electoral process. Is the new accusation because of the ballots they're now allowing to in essence be counted.

This seems very confusing, but also the game plan that you would expect from the Democrats right now.

Speaker 3

Well understand right now that Democrats are actively trying to steal an election in Pennsylvania, Dave McCormick has won that Senate race. He's won. The AP has called the race. Bob Casey, the incumbent Democrat, has lost. Bob Casey doesn't want to concede. Apparently Bob Casey and Chuck Schumer are election deniers. They don't like the results. They brought in a guy named Mark Elias. Mark Elias is the top

Democrat litigation attorney for elections in the country. Mark Elias's job is to try to steal elections, to try to try to get illegal votes in, to try to get Democrats to win. No matter matter what, I'm going to do something that I rarely will do on verdict. I'm just going to read from the New York Times. The New York Times is not a paper that I respected. It often is profoundly dishonest. But when the Democrats are too extreme for The New York Times, that tells you something.

Here's an article from the New York Times. The headline quote. In Pennsylvania, the election litigation continues with a twist as a Senate recount plays out. At least four counties are ignoring an order from the state Supreme Court that undated or misdated male ballots cannot be counted, and the article begins in an election defined in part by a tsunami of litigation before the polls even opened. Few states saw as much legal haggling over which ballots should count as Pennsylvania.

The polls have long since closed, yet a new round of litigation is flooding the recount battle between Senator Bob Casey, a Democrat, and Dave McCormick, his Republican challenger, who currently leads by a n twenty one thousand votes, a margin rarely overtaken by a simple recount. The landscape, however, is different in at least four counties, Bucks, Philadelphia, Center, and Montgomery.

Local election officials are acting in open defiance of a ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that arrived weeks before the election. The court found that male ballots that are missing the date on the outer envelope or that have the wrong date cannot be counted for this election. The Bucks County Election Commission felt differently. Quote it's a pretty stupid thing to not count someone's vote simply because they didn't date an envelope for a ballot, said Robert Harvey, Junior.

The chairman of the board and a Democrat who's desperately trying to steal the election. That last part is me editorializing. During a meeting on Tuesday where the board voted two to one to count four hundred and five ballots with date errors on the envelope, he added that election officials know when ballots were printed for voters, making the outer envelope date requirement meaningless. The law needs to be changed, mister Harvey said. The commissioners were advised that they were

likely to be sued no matter how they ruled. So we're going to get sued either way. I'd rather be on the side of counting ballots than not counting them, mister Harvey said. So you have four counties that are battling the State Supreme Court that are refusing to follow the State Supreme Court. You've got Bucks, Philadelphia, Montgomery and

Center and the commissioners. Lisa Dally, who's one of the Democratic commissioners on the Philadelphia board, said before her vote that she felt a local city court had ruled in the ballots that the ballots should count, and that the state Supreme Court did not reject that decision, and so in an interview, Seth Bluestein, the Republican commissioner on the county commission, reiterated that the State Supreme Court had already

settled the issue. Quote, even though the commissioners and the boards of elections have some discretion in how they vote, when you have something as explicit as an order from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, we need to follow that. And what is amazing if you listen to one of the Democrat members of the Bucks County Board, dian Diane m Elis Marsigalia, here's what Miss Ellis Marsigalia said, she's a

Democrat on the Buck Bucks County Board. Quote. I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn't matter anymore in this country. People violate laws any time they want. So for me, if I violate this law, it's because I want a court to pay attention. There's nothing more important than counting votes. So you've got Democrats in Pennsylvania openly defying the law. You've got the state Supreme Court.

And by the way, the State Supreme Court or Democrats, the State Supreme Court is issued an order as to what ballots you can legally count and what ballots you can't, and these local Democrat are pissed because under that result, the Republican has won. And so their view is, We're going to keep illegally counting ballots and keep illegally counting ballots until the Democrat wins, and the instant of the Democrat wins, We're done. It is shocking, and it is

happening in plain daylight. And mind you, that's not me saying that, that's New York Times.

Speaker 2

So how do you And this is where people have lost, I think just total faith in the system. If the court has said you can't do this, and they're like, maskert will do it anyway, what is the recourse And is there a real chance they could actually succeed in stealing this election? Because as you said it, and I agree with you, this is active, an active campaign by Democrats to steal an election they know they lost.

Speaker 3

Well, look, there's litigation, and I can tell you the McCormick campaign that they have hired serious lawyers. They're engaged in litigation, they're fighting back and hopefully the courts will stop this. But I'll tell you what, it's not just the New York Times. Do you know who the Democrats have lost. They've lost the Washington So here's the Washington Post editorial board quote. Democrats thumb their nose at the rule of law in Pennsylvania. Elections need rules, and they

must be applied equally and consistently. And this is the Washington Post editorial board, no friend to Republicans. Quote. Before the November fifth election, Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that provisional ballots must be signed in two required places and that

mail in votes must be dated. Yet, elected Democrat officials in Philadelphia and three other counties buck Centera Montgomery voted this week to defy these and other court decisions at the request of lawyers for Democratic Senator Bob Casey, who trails GOP challenger Dave McCormick by about twenty four thousand votes, with almost all of the roughly seven million ballots cast having been counted. These Democrats' decision will almost certainly be

overturned on appeal. But the mere attempt to defy judicial rulings is corrosive to democracy and invites similar behavior in future elections. Now, this is this is the Washington Post who's pointing out And by the way, understand, you've got elected Democrats in Pennsylvania who are voting openly we are going to ignore the Pennsylvania Supreme Court because we want the Democrats to win. And why are they doing this Because Bob Casey, the Democrat, went to them and said,

ignore the Supreme Court. It's more important that I the Democrat, win than that you follow the law. And you know what I got to say, if there's a Democrat in Washington who is embarrassed by this shameless undermining of democracy, I don't know who it is. It certainly hasn't been Joe Biden. It certainly hasn't been Kamala Harris, It certainly hasn't been Chuck Schumer. It certainly hasn't been Bob Casey.

They're all cheering this on. And these are the same people that you could not shut them up from talking about their love for democracy, except for the fact that the one they're trying to defy the law and undermine democracy.

Speaker 2

So it's almost the end of the year, and that's when people start doing their New Year's resolutions.

Speaker 1

And if you're like me, you.

Speaker 2

Probably thought maybe last year, hey, you're gonna get in shape, you're gonna lose weight.

Speaker 1

Well, the good news is. I actually did it.

Speaker 2

I lost more than seventy pounds, and I would not have been able to do it without the help from Chalk. You've got to check out Chalk and what they can do for you. If you're a guy and you feel like you've lost your edge, maybe you are just tired.

Speaker 1

All the time.

Speaker 2

You want to be more active, you want to work out, but you're just sick and tired of well being. Sick and tired, you're sitting on the council all the time, you're not working out. The problem is real. It's men's testosterum levels. They are off a cliff historically, at an all time low. And the patriots at Chalk spelled CHOQ are helping men just like you well proudly maximize your masculinity by boosting your testosterm levels up to twenty percent

over ninety day. Now, I've lost about eighty pounds in the little over the last year, and it is because of the huge difference it has made with this male Vitality Stack. I've been taking it for over a year. You've got to try it. It's manufactured right here in the US of A. Chalk's natural orbal supplements are clinically proven to have game changing effects on your energy, your focus,

and your mood. So check out Chalk, go right now to choq dot com and if you use the code Ben, you're going to get a massive discount on any subscription for life. That's choq dot com code Ben for lifetime savings on any subscription limited time offer. And the best part is this subscriptions are canceable at any time, so don't waste another year. Go right now choq dot com.

Use the code Been for a massive discount, and check out the Mail Vitality Stack and boost your testops from levels up to twenty percent over ninety days.

Speaker 1

Center.

Speaker 2

Finally, there's one other issue that I want hit and it's an important one and it deals with the lefts increased calls for censorship.

Speaker 1

Post election.

Speaker 2

Media elites are fuming over their inability to force feed narratives to the American people. They're also angry that the media seems to be losing their power, the potency, you know, whether it's Saturday Night Live or the Late Shows, or CNN or or MSNBC. Their ratings are down, and so now they're saying, well, we just need to censor everybody and just take it all down from the internet.

Speaker 1

Anything we don't like.

Speaker 3

Well, the Democrats, they're not actually looking introspectively and saying, gosh, maybe we were wrong on the issues. Maybe the fact that over seventy percent of Americans thought we were on the wrong track, maybe that's a problem. Maybe we shouldn't have had an open border and let this country be invaded. Maybe we shouldn't have spent money like drunken sailors and caused inflation that that hurt working families across this country.

Maybe maybe maybe we shouldn't have waged a war on energy that that hurt everyone who's struggling to make ends meet. Maybe we shouldn't have undermined our friends and allies, and we shouldn't have appeased our enemies. Maybe we shouldn't have given a hundred billion dollars to Iran that funds terrorists in Hamas and Hesbalah and causes a war. Maybe we shouldn't have transformed peace and prosperity into war across the globe. Maybe we shouldn't have turned the other way and in

fact secretly cheered on antisemitic protesters that threaten students. Maybe our policies are wrong. That would be a rational and sensible thing for Democrats to do. So they're not doing that. Instead, they're saying, hmm, maybe if people just didn't know what we were doing. Maybe if they couldn't say what we were doing, Maybe if they couldn't criticize what we're doing. Yeah,

that's how we'd win. So Jensaki, Joe Biden's former press secretary, Jensaki, went on a podcast and she said this quote, one of the things that's changed ever since I got involved in politics is just the rise of the percentage of people who get their information off of platforms that have no fact checking mechanism and no accountability for having disinformation spread.

Speaker 1

Quote.

Speaker 3

Local TV is held to a higher standard of account ability than social media platforms in terms of accurate information on their platforms. That is crazy.

Speaker 1

Quote.

Speaker 3

Laws have to change. I don't even know the entire answer to it, but it seems to me to be a core issue. And in particular, she focused on Trump appearing on Joe Rogan, the fact that he could go directly in front of the voters, and here's what she says, quote, I don't think Joe Rogan deserves one hundred percent of the credit for Donald Trump being elected, but it was a misunderstanding of kind of kind of also how people are getting their information, and an underval valuing of some

of those platforms that Trump was doing. This is sadly where the Democrats are understand. She's not saying we the Democrats, need to communicate better. She's not saying we the Democrats need to change their policies. She's saying, we need to change the laws to make it illegal for that sob Joe Rogan to say things we don't like. We need to change the laws to make it illegal for anyone to post on X what the actual facts are of what we the Democrats are doing. If we can silence everyone,

then we stay in power forever. That is dangerous as hell.

Speaker 2

Yeah, listen to Jinsaki when she was doing this, uh this podcast and what she said.

Speaker 7

And no accountability for having disinformation spread right, And as you know, well, and I mean when I when I got started in democratic politics, you know, most of it was like local TV ads. That was what it was about. Obviously, national TV, local print, those local TV is held to a higher standard of accountability than social media platforms in terms of having accurate information on their platforms. That is crazy and so it is. How how does it change?

Speaker 4

How is it?

Speaker 1

How is it?

Speaker 7

How are people held to account? Laws have to.

Speaker 1

Change, laws have to change. Center.

Speaker 2

I guess we're just seen to start locking up anybody that says something we don't like.

Speaker 3

That, sadly is where the Democrats are. And listen, we talked before during the election how this campaign with Kamala Harrison Tim Waltz was the most anti free speech campaign since John Adams who had signed the Alien and Sedition Acts. And it really is historic and dangerous. I'm glad that

the American people repudiated that assault on free speech. And yet I don't hear anyone in the Democrat Party defending free speech, and sadly, I think they're going to double down on the answer is more censorship, so no one dares criticize us.

Speaker 1

Yeah, I agree with you.

Speaker 2

There, don't forget what this show Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Make sure you hit that subscribe or auto download button right now so you don't miss an episode. And on those in between days, grab my podcast as well, the Ben Ferguson Podcasts, and I'll keep you up to date on the latest breaking news and the Senator, and I will see you back here on Wednesday morning.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast