ELECTION NIGHT 2022 RECAP!

the House. The concerning moment of the night is the Senate is still very much it's even at this point, and that concerns all of us. This was a map that was a map that was designed in this midterm for Democrats. They had the advantage. There's a lot of tribalism in this country. We can see now shocking that Fetterman is still in this one. Shocking what we're seeing in Arizona right now. But let's focus on the one exciting point in the House races. We are going to

have a substantial red wave in the House. That means Nancy Pelosi is going to retire and we won't have to deal with her anymore. But we're also going to have subpoena power in the House to get some stuff downe that needs to be looked at. Well. I think that's right. I think it is a good election tonight, but I also think it could have been much better. So it is a red wave, but it's not as

big a wave as it should have been. Frankly, given the disaster from the Democrats, this should have been a massive red wave and we're going to take the House. But at this point it's not clear how big a majority. I had hoped it would be a forty fifty vote majority. I think it will be substantially smaller than that. We are losing a number of close House races that we're winnable that we didn't win. The Republicans at this moment have one hundred and seventy five seats, Democrats are one

thirty eight in the House. There's one hundred and twenty one at eleven thirty one Central time that are still out there. And again we're going to win back the House. That's going to be great. Senator. I want to get into some predictions in just a moment, but first I want to tell everybody about an amazing company and if you're a conservative, if you're a Christian conservative, you need

to check out Patriot Mobile. Of you have a cell phone, how would you like to know that you're actually fighting for the causes you believe in every time you make a phone call. That's what happens when you're with Patriot Mobile. They are America's only Christian conservative mobile phone provider and they are a force for conservative values. Now, I've been telling you about them for years and been using them

for years. Why because they take a portion of my bill every month and they fund conservative causes in Canada, to believe in the sanctity of life, freedom of speech, the Second Amendment. And that is why I recommend them. Patriot Mobile has affordable plans that can save you money. They can save you money on your personal bill, your family's bill, and even your business. They offer the same nationwide coverage as the major carriers because they use the

same towers in the same networks that you're using right now. Plus, every time you pay your bill and every time you use your phone, you're supporting conservative values that you believe in with every call. You want to save even more, go online to Patriot Mobile dot com. Slash Verdict Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict and you'll get free activation. You can also call them. Switching is easy and many times you can keep the same cell phone that's in

your hand right now. Nine seven to Patriot. That's nine seven to Patriot. Use the promo code Verdict you'll get free activation and other amazing deals Patriot mobile dot com slash verdict or nine seven to Patriot. You look at the Senate right now, and this is the part that is very concerning. It's forty seven forty seven as we speak. We're going we're headed for probably a runoff in Georgia.

For people that don't understand this, if you don't get above fifty percent right now in Pennsylvania, if Fetterman has a forty thousand vote lead with eighty two percent in, and that's concerning that, that is very concerning. What does that tell you about the mistake that was made with And I say mistake because I think Oz was the easier candidate to beat him my opinion in the general. Look, I went all in for Dave McCormick in the primary.

I leaned in vigorously. Part of the reason I went all in as I thought he was the strongest conservative who could win. I think if McCormick had been the nominee, he would have won decisively. I hope oswins as we're sitting here late at night. I supported Oz once he was the nominee. I wanted him to win. I think Fetterman is a spectacularly bad candidate. He's radically, he's extreme, he's on the bleeding left. He's going to join if he if he becomes the Senator, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie

Sanders in the cuckoo caucus of the Democrat Party. That is not good. That's not I think where a lot of Pennsylvanians are. But but there were. What does it takeaway that a guy that has clearly cognitive issues has had this stroke. I hate that for him sincerely. But can't even get through debates, says good night at the beginning debate. Cannot understand questions, basic questions. This is a guy you wouldn't want to be the pilot of your plane or your uber driver. You probably wouldn't hire him

for a lot of jobs right now. It's because of the of the medical issues, and yet he's leading as we speak at eleven thirty three at night, in a race that is so important that could that could really deal with who's in charge of the Senate. Look the two million, three hundred and eighty six thousand, five hundred ninety five people who as of now have voted for Fetterman, they only care about one voticass and that's for Chuck Schumer. That they don't care that he can spell his name,

they don't care that he knows what's going on. They want him to vote for Chuck Schumer because we are so deeply divided and tribalized. That's their team for the same reason that there were no Philadelphia residents rooting for the Houston Astros. Why because their team is the Phillies. Of course, like you know that, it's not complicated. If you're a Philly guy, you root for the Phillies across the country. And this is true on both sides, This

is true red and blue. Were people right now put on their jersey and they're not focused on If you could pull those Democrat voters, I'd love to see a room attended those Democrat voters and be like, Okay, do you agree with Fetterman voting over and over and over again to release murderers do you agree with that? Yeah? Do you agree with Fetterman saying we should release one third of the criminals in prison in Pennsylvania? Do you

agree with that? Like, his positions have been radical, and yet at least in this election, and we've been moving more and more in that path, radical or not. And by the way, I think many, if not most, of those Democrats have voted for him, don't actually agree with those views, but they don't really know about them. The corporate media doesn't cover them, and their view is just I'm on team Democrat. Yeah, soote I vote Democrat and

that's where we are. If you're going to win, you've got to make the election about issues and not personalities. And by the way, this is a broader point. I think too many of these Republican races became personality battles. I when you have first time candidates who've never run, who are celebrities or you know, coming from outside, they have no record, they have no voting record, they've not been involved in issues, they've not that, they've never taken

a stand on anything. They frequently make major mistakes, and you know, experience matters, like actually knowing what you're doing matters. You were a serious competitive tennis player. You played at all miss. You know, if I wandered out on the tennis court for a competitive Division one game, I'd get crushed. And it doesn't matter that that on my iPhone, I have a tennis game that if I flicked my finger, I can I have a wicked backhand on my iPhone.

But it actually experience does matter, and acts does matter, and spending. You know, when you were seven years old, you were going to tennis camp and practicing and you know, hitting a backhand over and over and over and over again, so that it became routine. If you look at some of these races with first time candidates, what they became

was personality battles. The single best political advice I've ever gotten came from Heidi, and it came years ago, right when I was getting started, and she said, remember, it's not about you. It's about them. It's about their lives, it's about their kids, it's about their family, it's about

their future. You can tell a bad candidate if they stand up there and say over and over again the word I I I. You know, I remember back in in two thousand and eight the Iowa Caucuses, Hillary Clinton was supposed to have a coronation and this unknown senator

from Illinois stuns the world by beating her. And I'm watching the TV speeches that night and Hillary Clinton gets up at her concession speech such as it was every third word was I I I and over her right shoulder, Bill Clinton was standing the best natural politician of his generation. And you could see Bill Clinton physically wins. It was like he was being punched. I remember, I remember watching it. It was the difference between Hillary and Bill Clinton was

just night date. It's like, how did he not coach her more? He was in agony. I mean it was he was in actual pain. Every time she said I, you could see the pain in his eyes. You cut to Barack Obama and his speech that night, every third word was we we we watching them. My reaction is

that guy's gonna win. And I will say, in too many of these races, it became about the personality and not about the issues that impact the kitchen table, the kids, the family, the safety, the security that impact the people. That's what we need to make races about. There's some good news tonight. One of your dear friends, one of your closest friends in the Senate. We were concerned about this race, talked about it on this show. You went out there for Mike Lee. That race has now been

called for Mike Lee. You've got to be happy about that personally. Look, I'm very happy. If Mike Lee had lost tonight, it would have been cataclysmic. I literally would have been in tears if Mike Lee had lost. He is by far my closest friend in the Senate. He has a smart, principled conservative. He's also the single most frequent guests on Verdict. I think Mike has been three times on Verdict. There's no other person that has been that many times on Verdict. His race was close. Public

polling had it three points. At one point, it had him down. He ended up winning by as of tonight, twelve points. He ended up winning pretty decisively. And I think what happened was Republicans came home that even the sort of so the reason he was in danger is all the d's we're voting for McMullan, and the sort of wobbly ours who want to be nice and aren't

sure and think Mike is really conservative. They were flirting with McMullan and and I think the tribalism prevailed, and they said, Okay, I'm not voting for the guy the Democrats support. I'm coming home. I'm glad of it there, I'm not glad of it. In the New York ubernatorial race. I wish Lee's elded in one. He ran an amazing campaign, by the way, with not near the resources that the Democrats had. You and I talked about this on the Live portion earlier and for I think it's important to recap.

If there's any big take way from these midterm elections, is that Democrats are doing a hell of a lot better job of fundraising and funding their candidates. Republicans are holding back great candidates by not raising as much money as we need to to be competitive and to win

some of these races. And that may be one of the biggest takeaways from these midterms is it is time for Republicans to go out there and to get in this game and write more checks and to give more money to candidates because Democrats are doing an amazing job of that. Republicans are are letting too many candidates kind of hang out to drive for too long before at the last minute they go, Okay, let's give a little extra cash here. Well, the damage has already done. Democrats

are far better at fundraising nationwide than we are. We should learn from this now getting ready for the president in the big election twenty twenty four. Look, we also need Republicans to step up and answer the call, and we need serious candidates with experience. You look at the best candidates this cycle. Adam Laxalt in Nevada, who I backed early. Adam was the attorney general in Nevada. He ran for governor, did not win governor. But he's smart, experienced, talented,

he has a record, he read a disciplined campaign. Sitting here tonight, we don't know if he'll win or lose, but he was the best candidate to win in Nevada. If Adam doesn't win in Nevada, nobody could have won. And he was by far the best candidate to win in Nevada. Another one of the really good candidates this cycle was Eric Schmidt in Missouri. Same thing. He was

the attorney general in Missouri. Smart, discipline, it had been on the ballot, had a very conservative record, knew the pitfalls, knew the questions that knew the ways you can step on a landmine, and blow up if we end up if the Democrats keep control of the Senate, which is entirely possible as we sit here tonight. I don't think it'll happen, but it's possible. You know one person who could have altered that single handedly, Kris s Unw, the

governor New Hampshire. Yeah, Kris sin Uknew, a very popular governor. If he had run for Senate, he would have won. And he made the decision. I like being governor. It's a better job, you know my reaction. So what it's a better job that's good for you. How about for the country. How about for the three hundred million people that are getting screwed by these left wing socialists. Look Arizona right now. I hope we pull out Arizona. Yeah, let's talk about Arizona, because Arizona is one that you

and I talked about a lot. You've been out there. This was a race that was obviously personality driven. To go back to that theme for a moment, and what we're seeing in Arizona is not what we wanted to see, at least at this point tonight. As we are recording this at eleven forty three in the evening, and I will say, if you followed traditional standards for how you win Arizona, the obvious candidate to run was Doug Doocy,

the incumbent Republican governor, relatively popular in the state. If you're talking about who could beat an incumbent Democrat with a ton of money, Doocey was the obvious choice. So why did Doocy not run? Doucy didn't run because Donald Trump Patson and if Doocy had run, Trump would have carpet bombed him into oblivion. They would have had a civil war and we would have lost. So as a

result Doocy didn't win. If we end up losing Arizona, I think we ought to look back and say, well, was there a candidate who could have won, and why didn't they run? And is that good? You look at Colorado. I think Colorado was a winnable state, although given the tribalism that played out, it may have been less winnable than possible. Initially it was perceived. I think Bennett was

a very weak incumbent. I think it was vulnerable. But you look at the Republican Canada at Joe O'Day, he's a business guy, never run for office, didn't know anything about politics. Were nice guy, I met him, I liked him, I supported him. What killed him? One? He was massively outspent.

But secondly he went on one of the Sunday shows and they asked him, Hey, what do you think about Trump running in twenty four And he said, well, I would actively oppose that, that's a bad idea, and I would campaign against him, and he listed several other people that he would support. Now, in a normal universe where you had someone trying to run in Colorado, trying to appeal to moderate or independent or liberals in the Denver suburbs, that's not an insane answer for someone to say in

a state like that. But the reaction of Trump should have been obvious at this point. Trump's reactions are entirely predictable and consistent, yes, which he is not waver in his response. The next day, Trump turned around and punched him in the face and told people, don't vote for the guy, and the race was lost at that point. Now, look, I wish O'Day when asked that question, that's not a hard question for O'Day to dodge to simply say, you know, I'm focused on twenty two and and and the voters

can worry about that in the future. But it is an example where the fact that you had a candidate never run who didn't understand, how are they going to try to get me to step on a landmine? The reason that's a landmine in Colorado is whatever answer he gave, yeah, pissed off a big chunk of voters He needed. He needed all the Trump hardcore supporters to be with him to have a prayer, but he also needed to not alienate the rest of the voters. And so that combination

I think was unfortunate. You look at one of the other thing, yesteen points as a governor, while at the same time we lose the Senate race. That's shocking. If the Democrats keep the Senate by one seat, Chris Sanuna single handedly could have changed that, which it's amazing it's going to come down to that. You look at Georgia. Now we're seeing a little bit of a lead for Warnock.

I don't think either person at this point in the night, it looks pretty clear they're not going to get to the fifty plus one that you're gonna need to win. That's going to go back to runoff. This could also be for the control of the Senate. It could all come down to Georgia, which which is not a place we want to necessarily go back to. Look right now, it looks like we're headed to a runoff in Georgia.

Oh this is good Wisconsin. Right now, it looks like Ron Johnson has a three point lead with eighty eight percent in a seventy four thousand vote lead. That's positive. I think Ron will hold on. That's another seat we need him to hold on. I think you will. Fetterman is up sixty two thousand votes with eighty three percent in, and so how we deal with that? All right? Warnock Warnock is up right now, Yeah, almost thirty thousand votes with ninety five percent in. But they're both below fifty

percent right now. So it looks like we're headed to a runoff. When you look at this, the media is obviously going to go really, really crazy and analyzing how much the Donald Trump endorsement helped her hurt? What is the takeaway from this from from that, because they're going to spend weeks on this saying was he was he an asset or did he take away? You look at he went all in in that ration. Michigan for Tutor Dixon. She lost there. That was called pretty early in the night.

He didn't he didn't put money behind it. Well that's true. Look, going all in, when you have one hundred million dollars in the bank, go spend money. Tutor Dixon had no money. Yeah, and I mean it was it was a massive differential in spending. Look, going all in is not sending out a tweet. Look did it help or hurt both? It helped enormously. Jd Vance would not be a senator without Donald Trump, period, full stop. Jady Vance was losing that primary.

Trump came in, endorsed him, and it catapult advanced to the lead. Now it's clear that Trump's endorsement has a much bigger impact in a Republican primary than in a general election. That much is clear. With Vance, it turned out, and he's one of the exceptions. He'd never run before, he was a first time candidate, and yet he proved more disciplined than some of the other first time candidates.

And I will say you and I have talked at length about the nationwide month long seventeen state bus tour I did. I spent an entire day with Jade Vance I'd met JD before, but I didn't really know him, and he really impressed me. For one thing. When I came to Ohio, we given to and said use it, and we told that to other candidates. Yeah, his campaign did a better job of using my time. So they had three rallies all over the state in different parts

of the state. They had a big fundraiser where they raised a bunch of money that they had me come to on the bus. In between each of the different stops. They had me on the phone non stop to talk radio host all over the state. So they systematically one call after the other. Now you're particularly sympathetic to being on the phone with talk radio host, absolutely, but it was It was impressive. The first rally we did was at nine or nine thirty in the morning, and they

had a packed house. They had hundreds of people come out early in the morning or relatively early. Yeah, that's unusual. There are a lot of campaigns that can't do that. And so Trump won the primary for him hands down. But I will say Vance ran a disciplined, effective campaign and won the general. And one of the lessons I think we need to take is to win to win in twenty two and to win in twenty four. We've

got to be united. We've got to have There are desperate parts of the Republican Party where if we're at war, the Democrats win. Now, that doesn't mean that within the party we shouldn't press the party. Look, I have famously battled Republican leadership for years, and I fully expect going forward to continue doing so. We should have vigorous fights about what we should stand for and what we should do.

And I'm going to press harder than anyone for the Republican majorities to act like it and deliver on our promises. By the way, we just saw Wisconsin narrow it's now thirty thousand vote margin. That's less than ideal than Fetterman's up sixty two thousand votes, which is just shocking to me in Pennsylvania that Fetterman, a guy that had the worst debate I think in history modern political times, is

actually winning by sixty two thousand votes. As we do this at eleven fifty two Central Time at night, over doctor Oz there, and I want to say, by the way, in Pennsylvania, the Democrats have gone out of their way to say, remember the votes won't be done on election night, we're gonna be counting for days to come, So who the heck knows what kind of cluster, Yeah, is gonna

unfold in Pennsylvania. But the degree to which both Pennsylvania and Arizona, I don't know if the counting, and it may be true in Nevada also that the counting could continue for some time. It seems I have a feeling we're gonna be doing another verdict, especial one on Wednesday, because that's how long it's going to take to figure out what all this actually is going to look like. But a clear lesson is when you go into a general election, you've got to unite the clans to use

a Braveheart reference, You've got to bring everyone together. If we're divided, we lose. Another clear lesson is you need effective, serious candidates maya philosophy is the strongest conservative who can win, And you've got to have resources that if we send our candidates in and they're being out spent three to one or five to one or ten to one, they

will lose. And at the end of the day, we need to ask ourselves, do we want to lose our country because we're not funding these people because the differential is deeply concerning. So those are two significant takeaways. Well, let's talk about the mindset for everyone that's hearing this. I think there's a lot of people that are going to be waking up and be a little bit depressed that this is the outcome. It is still significant that

we're going to take back the House. Yes, that is some thing that is going to hold this administration accountable. It's going to be able to investigate this administration. It could lead to things like a possible impeachment and my archists and other things like that that are very important. And accountability for Fauci and what he did with getting a function research and funding in Wuhan Institute of Virology and all of the things that happened there. Let's not

overlook that that is a big moment. We should celebrate it and for people that might be a little bit down, don't be because that is huge for this country. Fully agree, Senate wise, I mean, this is that's where you serve. What's your takeaway? I don't know looking at it right now. Ninety six percent in in Georgia warnox ahead walkers behind neither over fifty. If that goes to a runoff. It could be control of the Senate Pennsylvania right now, Fetterman's winning. Yeah,

if we lose Pennsylvania. Let's suppose we lose Pennsylvania and we win Nevada. And by the way, we don't have any numbers right now from Nevada. So I think I think La Salt is a good candidate. But we've seen tribalism Democrats returning to their team. I don't know that Adam wins Nevada. I hope he does. I want him to have campaigned with him repeatedly. I think he's a good candidate, but the results in other states are not suggesting the kind of red tsunami that there's some Nevada

numbers that we just got in there. This is obviously with Harley any this is maybe the first place coming in. It's reporting there with zero point one four percent coming in at eleven fifty nine. And these are going to change a lot because they're talking about one polling place or two coming in there. But like you said, you look at tribalism that as a as hopeful there as

we would have been a couple of hours ago. Yeah, so listen, if we are looking at a scenario where we lose Pennsylvania and we win Nevada, then we're back to the runoff in Georgia determining control of the Senate. That's not always something. We don't win Arizona and I guess there's an outside chance. But we're looking at the numbers right now and Kelly's up sixteen points and no, fifty percent is in. Maybe, but that's a big, big no. I mean, when you're talking about two hundred and twenty

eight thousand vote differential, that's that is significant. That would be a lot to overcome it. Now, you can't overgeneralize because it depends like there can be really blue counties and really red counties, and maybe the blues are all in and the red seven come. So I've seen swings, but swings are typically in the five point range and not the seventeen point. Yeah, this is uh, this is not the night we were hoping for in the Senate. I think we can agree with that. There's the newest

Nevada numbers. We just got a big dump that came in thirty three percent reporting there, Adam at forty two percent, she's it now at fifty four percent. Up on the screen there that is significus called fan and this in Pennsylvania, this is not the news here wanting and Fox News has just called the Fetterman race as the winner there forty nine point four to Odz at forty eight point two. That is a gain for the Democrats there. That now

changes everything in the Senate. Senator. Um, we've got to win Georgia and Nevada to take control of the Senate and not lose Wisconsin. I think you and I both thought at dinner we'd be fifty two fifty three. That's gone. I was at fifty three fifty or that that ain't happening. Maybe we get to fifty one, but we could easily be with a Democrats Senate. That losing Pennsylvania changes the math profoundly now that they're calling it this way. The

biggest mistake in Pennsylvania was picking odds. I did rallies all over the state of Pennsylvania with McCormick. I went all in and by the way, people may not realize this, that was a very very very slim loss in number of votes that night. A few thousand vote, yeah, a couple of thousand votes, and McCormick would have won tonight. So it may be that that primary gave the Democrats the Senate. If that's the outcome, that's hard to stomach.

Hard to stomach if you go back and look at that primary, it was a very divided primary and there were forces that were involved that we're very influential and picking Oz that may have been one of the biggest mistakes for control of the Senate. Again, now everyone calling Pennsylvania now for Fetterman. Look, Um, that's not good. Yeah, it's not good for the country. One thing I know for sure, we'll be doing another podcast I think on Wednesday,

because it's not gonna it's not gonna end. Uh, We're not gonna know tonight, I think for sure, as we're doing this at midnight. But by the way, Ben, since this is airing tomorrow morning, yes, um, some of the folks watching it tomorrow morning will not have participated in our live event tonight. They may wonder why the hell we're drinking white claws. Yes, that's very true. We should end on at least an entertaining note. We are both having a white claw. Will you ever drink another one

of these? Big the rest of your life? I doubted this. That's the only one I'm not gonna do as well I have ever drunk. It was mango. I like mango, but but I tend if I'm going to drink an alcoholic beverage of beer is quite fine, or a glass of wine. I think hard seltzer is not my thing. Well, and honor of you taken two shots of white claw this week and blocking one. I figured it was entertaining. Why so I had two cans full cans on opened

cans of white cloth thrown at me. By the way, Ben, I'm gonna say, so this is now an empty plant can because I've drunk it. So I'm going to throw it at you that by the one, I'm not gonna throw this. Mine's like ninety percent full. I'm like the kid that's just holding the fake beer in college, right, yeah, no I I well, then please don't throw it because I don't wish you to. I don't wish to smell of mango. Yes, yes, like okay? That will really you come home to two, Heidi, You walk in the bedroom.

Your husband stinks of mango. Man, don't even know what you accuse him of. Like where are you? Maybe I rand to cancoon? That would be the only thing where were you really tonight? I don't election nights, um, but yes, in the victory parade for the Astros, where there were over a million people came out in Houston, there were some angry Democrats. Actually, I think every Beto supporter in the state came out. Even though he Beto lost by twelve points statewide. They were at the parade and they

were yelling and convinced their guy was gonna win. And you know, one guy flung two full and unopened cans of white claw, which I think the fact that it was white claw is highly revealing. Yes, first one missed, landed in the vehicle. The second one was headed at me and I blocked it with my arm, knocked it down in the vehicle. I wasn't hurt at all. But

the fellow was arrested and is facing charges. And I will say I put out a statement thanking the police who did a fabulous job keeping me safe arresting him. But I did say I'm glad the clown who threw his white claw at me had a noodle for an arm, because if he you know, if he could throw a ninety mile hour fastball, I might have been might have been in the hospital rather than here with you on

the Verdict stage. And that's very true. As we sign off tonight, Senator, biggest race, you're happy that we won to night at least I want to get that, Mike Lee. Mike Lee, Mike Lee, biggest house race you're excited about for you. You busted your tail on the bus tour. There's gotta be one that you're going I love that victory. So I haven't seen all the results. I need to go through the house victories. I'm very glad Monica Dela Cruz one. That's a big deal in the valley history.

It is a seat that has been Democrat for over one hundred years, and so the valley is turning red. It didn't fully turn red this time. I thought it was this time, but it is moving that direction. I think that's a good thing. Biggest shock race of the night for you, Pennsylvania. That's mine too. I was hoping you're going to say that. Look, I think Fetterman is such a radical handidate, and I'm sad that the party tribalism of Democrats in Pennsylvania trumped reason and rationality. It's

gonna be very telling for the presidential election Pennsylvania. This one tonight, for me, just tells me there is such a small number of voters that are willing to switch tribes, even with a terrible economy. And maybe it's more on the Democratic side right than the Republican side, but it is shocking to me that with how bad things are in this country and in Pennsylvania, that you still can't get people to vote for what may be best for

the community. Instead it's just I'm a Democrat, damn it, and I'm going to always be a Democrat, and I'll vote for the most incompetent human being out there if they have a D next to their name. And that concerns me about the presidential because it's no longer three or four percent of independence that you've got a swing right, the swing voters. It may be down to half a percentage point in some of these states. Look, this election was a turnout battle, and we'll see where turnout comes out.

But we're gonna have to process the numbers. Um. I don't know how much of it was that ours didn't turn out as much as they needed to, And I don't know how much of it was that D's despite everything being and the crapper showed up and pulled the lever d anyway and said, you know, you know, give me more cowbell. That that's just what I need, you know, it's it's, you know, to mix my metaphors. I just at Christopher Walkin, but let's go to animal House, thank you, sir,

And I have another. Apparently they really like getting smacked with the board and and and want more of it, and that we need to do a better job making clear the stakes of these elections in people's lives. We mentioned before, this can't be a personality battle. It needs to be about substance and policy and how people can have a better life, yeah, or a worse life, because that's what the stakes are. As we end to night twelve h five am Central Time, well after one o'clock

Eastern time. If there's any I like to leave people with one thing that you can hold on to, Nancy Pelosi will no longer be the speaker of the House. If there's anything that can get you fired back up, even if you're upset about where some of these races went. At least Nancy Pelosi will retire and we will not have to deal with her ever again. In my side bed as she will become a constituent of Rhonda Santasist, which is particularly amusing because I think she'll to retire

to Florida and live on the beach, which which is irony. Personify. Hey, if we made any history night, you drank a wide call and I drank one tenth like tonight, Sentator. I enjoyed sitting down with you doing this tonight live on Verdict. For everybody watching, I'll say it to you. It makes you download The Verdict wherever you get your podcast. We do it three times a week. Two of them are audio only, so if you're watching this, make sure you

download the podcast. For all of the people listening Wednesday morning. With this podcast, I have a feeling we'll probably be putting out another one, letting you know after we get some of the more of these numbers in, So just download that subscribe auto download button on your phone and then you'll automatically know when that next episode of ours drops. Senator God bless American to night. The people have spoken

in many places. We may not like what they said everywhere, but at least this is the greatest country in the world. And people got to vote today and that always makes me happy. Thank you, sir, and it was fun doing this with you tonight.