ANOTHER Trump Assassination Attempt-These Security Failures MUST STOP - podcast episode cover

ANOTHER Trump Assassination Attempt-These Security Failures MUST STOP

Sep 16, 202441 minEp. 438
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

Transcript

Speaker 1

Welcome.

Speaker 2

It is verdict with Senator Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with you and Senator I cannot believe this is the second Sunday evening in the last couple of months where you and I are having a conversation about another assassination attempt against Donald Trump.

Speaker 3

Well, let us start by saying, thank god, President Trump is okay, that he was not injured, that he was not God forbid killed in this assassination attempt. But at the same time, every one of us should be horrified and should be angry that for the second time in sixty.

Speaker 1

Four days, a would.

Speaker 3

Be assassin with a high powered rifle has targeted President Trump. In the first instance, the assassin got off several shots, ended up murdering one man in the crowd and injuring two others. It up hitting Donald Trump, hitting him in the ear, coming within a half inch of killing President Trump. With yesterday's attempted assassination, the details are still not entirely clear.

More will come out in the days and weeks ahead, but what we do know is yet another assassin with a high powered rifle with a scope was there, presumably intending to murder, to assassinate Donald J. Trump, and he got within three hundred to five hundred yards from the President with a high powered rifle. The Secret Service saw him intercepted him. The early reports are that the Secret Service fired and they now have a suspect in custody,

so the President wasn't harmed. But for this to happen twice, twice in sixty four days is an incredible indictment of the secure that is being provided right now to President Trump. The decisions on the security are made by political appointees. They're made by Alejandro Majorcas, the Secretary of Homeland Security. They're made by the acting head of the Secret Service, and presumably they're made by some combination of Joe Biden

and Kamala Harris. And despite now two assassination attempts, one with shots fired, the other thankfully prevented, we think before shots could be fired, the Secret Service leadership is still not doing what it takes to protect President Trump. Now. I get that Alejandro Mayorcus is not going to vote for Trump. I get that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are not, but elections in America should not be decided by some jackass with a gun shooting your opponent, and

you want to talk about affronts to democracy. That this administration continues to fail to provide the security that is needed to President Trump is utterly and completely unacceptable. And whether you like Donald Trump or whether you can't stand Donald Trump, you ought to be outraged that this keeps being allowed.

Speaker 1

To happen, no doubt.

Speaker 2

And if you look back at the list of what he has gone through, and we're going to talk about that in a second, what got us to this point where this is now like the next thing on the list, It is shocking when you look at it. I want to talk to you real quick about the one year anniversary of the horrific IMMAs attacks on Israel, and still the Holy Land continues to be attacked on multiple fronts.

Deadly threats are increasing in northern Israel. Constant rocket attacks from Terrace back by Iran Hesbob been fired at Israel, causing widespread damage as well. Since the war started, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews has been on the forefront of Israel, addressing the needs of the most vulnerable. It is incredible to see how many of you that

listen to this show have gotten involved with IFCJ. Now, when I started partnering with IFCJ, it was a simple reason why I went to stand with the actual people in Israel, and your life saving donations have already helped provide incredible amounts of emergency food as well as critical security needs such as flat jackets, firefighting equipment, armored vehicles including armored ambulances that have actually been used to save countless lives, and bomb shelters. This is what IFCJ is

doing now. We're looking for five hundred listeners to join the fellowship and me by donating one hundred and fifty dollars to meet the urgent security needs on the ground in Israel. And thanks to the generous IFCJ supporter, your gift will be matched, doubling your impact in the Holy Life. So if you want to help the people in Israel, you can make a gift right now by calling eight eight eight for eight eight IFCJ. That's eight eight eight

four eight eight IFCJ or four three two five. You can also go online and you can donate securely at support IFCJ dot org to give. That's one word support IFCJ dot org. Israel needs are support now more than ever before. So stand with the people in Israel today support IFCJ.

Speaker 1

Dot Org. Senator.

Speaker 2

You look at how we got to the point where we're here now, and I think it's really important that we look back retrospectively at how we got here. It first started when they wanted to get rid of Donald Trump, and there was not one, but two impeachment.

Speaker 1

The first one was a coup attempt.

Speaker 2

They tried to overthrow the will of the voters by saying that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians off Adossia, that the Democratic Party knew was a lie, the FBI knew was a lie. It was paid for Hillary Quinton's campaign in the Democrat National Committee. When that didn't work, they moved on to another impeachment. And when that didn't work, they said, okay, we're going to go to law fare. Four indictments against Trump, thirty four victions, ninety one charges.

None of that worked so far. The man's still standing. So what's left You just take him out? Not one now, but we're talking about two assassination attempts. This should scare the hell out of every American that this is where we are with the left in this country.

Speaker 3

It's truly horrific. And before we get into how this was, why this was allowed to unfold, and what the security failures were, let's just start with assessing what happened yesterday. And I want you to listen to Sheriff Rick Bradshaw as he described what happened yesterday and what exactly transpired.

Speaker 1

All right, I'm thirty.

Speaker 4

This afternoon call came out shots fired, that was called in by the Secret Service. Because we're in constant contact with them all the time, we were notified to that and we had units here that immediately sealed off the area. Fortunately, we were able to locate a witness that came to us and said, hey, I saw the guy running out of the bushes. He jumped into a black Nissan and I took a picture of the vehicle and the tank,

which was great. So we had that information our real time crimes that are put it out to the license plate readers and we were able to get a hit on that vehicle on I ninety five as it was headed into Martin County.

Speaker 3

We got a hold of Martin.

Speaker 4

County Sheriff's office alerted them and they spotted the vehicle and pulled it over and detained the guy. After that, we took the victim.

Speaker 3

I'm sorry.

Speaker 4

The witness that witnessed the incident took flew him up there and he identified as the person that he saw running out of the bushes that jumped into the car. Now in the bushes where this guy was is a eight K forty seven style rifle with a scope, two backpacks which were hung on the fifths that had a ceramic tile in him, and a go pro which he was going to take pictures of him. So those are being process right now. The Secret Service agent that was

on the course and did a fantastic job. What they do is they have an agent that jumps one hole ahead of time to where the president was at and he was able to spot this rifle barrel sticking out of the fence and immediately engage that individual, at which time the individual took off. So that's what we know about the investigation. We have somebody in custody right now

that is a potential suspect. We got a little bit more to work to do on it, but as we usually do, as soon as we decide that, we're going to book him into the county jail.

Speaker 3

And the charges that he's going to be.

Speaker 4

Booked into we'll get those to you and we'll get a picture of them, and we'll get you his background. So now I'm going to turn it over to the representative of the Secret Service and he's going to make brief statement.

Speaker 2

Let's just stop there. And what I heard was, basically, this is another miracle. He didn't have the protection he needed. He's a guy that is out there playing golf one fairway on a golf course, on a par fourst three hundred plus yards. So that basically means if you've ever played golf and you're on the tea box, you're looking down the fairway and you see somebody up by the green, that's how close the shooter was from what we understand

of the president. And if you want a perspective on proximity with a high priorate rifle with a scope, this is not that far. Goes back to the shooting. We saw the assassination tiple last time, and they're like, yeah, if you get in the tree line, like it's basically lucky the draw if we see you or we don't see you, because we just got a guy that goes one the hole ahead and just kind of looks around and we got lucky today.

Speaker 1

That is unacceptable on so many different LEAs.

Speaker 3

Yet again, a shooter with a high powered rifle and a scope was able to get close to the president. In this instance, the reports we've heard are that he was between three and five hundred yards away. Now, three to five hundred yards is not a terribly difficult shot for a trained sniper, according.

Speaker 1

To public reports.

Speaker 3

Do you know the longest recorded sniper shot that has been reported.

Speaker 1

I'm going to guess it's over a mile or out a mile, so it is over a mile.

Speaker 3

The longest reported sniper shot is three eight and seventy one yards. In other words, ten times as far as this sniper was. Now that was that is that, there's another one that was reported at three thousand and seventy nine yards, And then they're a whole number of ones that have been recorded and confirmed in excess of one thousand yards. Now, those are world class snipers, those are military snipers. But it's worth noting we know there have been multiple reports of the nation of Iran has hired

hit men to kill Donald Trump. You would think a military that is trying to murder someone, they wouldn't just get someone off the street. They would get a trained sniper from three to five hundred yards. You don't have to be a world class sniper to hit a target, particularly if you're able to brace the gun and take time and aim, which presumably this shooter would have been

able to do. Now, as with Butler, Pennsylvania, I want to praise the individual Secret Service agents who are protecting Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, the ones immediately surrounding them when the shots were fired, they leapt up there, put their bodies in harm's way. They got President Trump out of harm's way after he had been shot, and they

demonstrated great heroism in the moment. In this instance, the early reports are the Secret Service agent spotted the sniper rifle in the bushes, in the shrubbery, and there may have been gunfire exchange. We don't know the exact details right now, but their intervention prevented that sniper presumably from getting a clean shot and possibly murdering President Trump. But the question to ask is how on earth does this keep happening? And you know, one of the things the

sheriff said there that is important. He said that the reason that there was not complete perimeter protection was because Trump is no longer the sitting president, and as a result, the Secret Service has given him dramatically scaled down protection to what they would have given him if he is

the president. Ben I am right now calling on Joe Biden, who is theoretically still the commander in chief, to today order the Secret Service to give Donald Trump full presidential protection right now to attempted assassinations in sixty four days, two failures by Secret Service for having woefully insufficient personnel. If President Trump wins in November, less than two months away, he will instantly get full presidential Secret Service protection on

election day. Given that fact, and given the threats and the failures we have seen, the only reasonable and rational thing to do is assigned President Trump right now a full presidential detail that includes the perimeter coverage so that you can't get a sniper that close. And if Joe Biden doesn't do it, and by the way, if Kamala Harris had any sense at all, she would join in the call to do this. If Kamala Harris had sent she'd stand up and say, I want to win at

the ballot box. I don't want my opponent murdered. We need to make sure he has the protection he needs. I don't think she'll do that, but it would be unquestionably the right thing for her to do.

Speaker 2

It's interesting that you mentioned this and you call for this. It does seem like it's common sense. But if you go back to the sheriff Rick Bradshaw, he was asked a question about this perimeter and like, how the hell can someone get so close? I actually don't blame him, and I want to be clear about this. He's just answering the question. Honestly. I really like the honesty and what seemed like a total transparency from him, where he's like, look, if you can get in the bushes, like you can

get in the bushes, you're hard to see. He's basically saying like we got lucky today. And then he's asked about the perimeter, like how can someone get so close? Listen to what he said.

Speaker 4

Well, you got to understand the golf course is surrounded by shrubbery, so when somebody gets into the shrubbery, they're pretty much out of sight, all right.

Speaker 3

And at this level.

Speaker 4

That he is at right now, well, he's not the city president. If he was, we would have had this higher golf course around him. Well, because he's not. The security is limited to the areas that the Secret Service deems possible. So I would imagine that the next time becomes at a golf course, they'll probably be a little bit more people around the perimeter. But the Secret Service

did exactly what they should have done. They provided exactly what the protection should have been, and their agent did a fantastic job.

Speaker 2

I mean, he's being honest, like, hey, we're not giving the guy what he needs because he's not the president. He's not given complete perimeter protection. I'm just being honest with you. The security is limited to the areas of the Secret Service deemed possible. So that's the key word that goes back to your point the sheriff saying, the security quote is limited to the areas that the Secret

Service deems possible. So what they're saying is you can get within three hundred yards, two hundred yards, four hundred yards of the president at any given time as a sniper, and we hope we see you before you shoot.

Speaker 3

Look, that's just completely unacceptable, and we've seen now twice in sixty four days, the risks that are attended to it. The Secret Service in Butler Pennsylvania. There were massive failures. But you know I'm not the only one pointing that out.

Last week, Senator Richard Blumenthal, who is Senator Bloomenthal is the chairman of the Committee on Permanent on Permanent Investigations of the Homeland Security Committee, and he held a press conference in Washington, d C. On Bloomenthal Dick Bloomenthal is a Democrat. But I want you to listen to just how dismayed he was and how shocked he was about how badly the Secret Service leadership failed with the Butler Pennsylvania attempted assassination.

Speaker 2

Now, before we play that for you, I want to talk to you real quick about the last year in my life. I am now down about seventy pounds. I feel so much better than I did literally a year and a couple weeks ago. And I got to give credit to my friends over at Chalk because they have had a huge impact on me losing the weight and getting back in the gym and getting in shape for

my kids. Look, I can tell you that there is nothing worse than feeling like you just have fatigue and that you're tired, that you want to get off the couch, you want to work out, but you just feel like you've lost that edge. You are not alone. The problem is men's sets Stopstrom levels are off a cliff historically at an all time low. And that is why I want you to check out Chalk Chalk Choq. They are helping real American men just like you, take back your

right to proudly maximize your masculinity. And they do it by boosting your testosteron levels up twenty percent over ninety days now. I've been taking the Chalk Vitality Stack for over a year and like I said, I have lost about seventy pounds. It's manufactured right here in the US of A. Chalk's natural herbal supplements are clinically proven to have game changing effects on your energy, on your focus,

on your mood. So if you're sick and tired of just feeling tired, You're sick and tired of wanting to work out, but you just don't have that energy, well, then you need to check out Chalk Maximize You're masculine today at chalkcchoq dot com. Now use the code Been for a massive discount on any subscription for life. You've got to use the code bin Choq promo code been. You're gonna get lifetime savings on any subscription limited time offer.

And here's the best part. Subscriptions are canceable at any time. It basically just puts you on a schedule where I know I have the mal Vitality stack sent.

Speaker 1

To my house every single month.

Speaker 2

Choq dot com promo code been for lifetime savings on any subscription limited time offer. All right, take a listen to Richard Blumenthal in his own words, and this was again before the second assassination attempt.

Speaker 5

I think the American people are going to be shocked, astonished, and appalled by what we will report to them about the failures by the Secret Service in this assassination attempt on the former president. But I think they also ought to be appalled and astonished by the failure of the Department of Homelands and Security to be more forthcoming, to be as candid and frank as it should be to

them in terms of providing information. And we are going to absolutely insist on the truth and the whole truth in documents and testimony as members of the United States Senate, but also as citizens.

Speaker 6

What did you learn new today when.

Speaker 5

I'm not going to go into what we have learned in specifics. I'm giving you my reaction, and we will have a report very very soon that I think will absolutely shock the American people, or it should, about the lapses and lags in the protection that was afforded that day and the breakdown in communication, failure and responsibility.

Speaker 6

Is the coming today or tomorrow?

Speaker 5

I'm sorry?

Speaker 6

Is they have a report coming out tonight or tomorrow?

Speaker 5

No?

Speaker 7

Do you think?

Speaker 3

I mean?

Speaker 7

Is there a level of urgency to get this information out as soon as possible because of the void that's being filled with conspiracy theories about what happened on that day?

Speaker 5

That is a really critical question. The failure of the Apartment of Homeland Security to be more forthcoming fuels the conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact. If government officials fail to be factual and forthcoming, the Petri dish for the virus of untruth and conspiracy theories is made all the richer. We have an urgency, we have an imperative to get the facts and make them public, all

of them, as soon as possible. I cannot say more passionately how urgent I feel this mission is because the American people need and deserve to know the truth, even if it's embarrassing, because the way to avoid these kinds of catastrophes in the future is to have the truth made known to American So then, and do you feel.

Speaker 7

The Secret Service has made the necessary adjustments immediately given the fact that we are at the height of a presidential campaign with so many different protectores under their charge.

Speaker 2

Let me just say this to everybody listening. Listen carefully to what he says in response to that answer, because and I want people to just really focus on this, because clearly he has been sold at Billa Goods.

Speaker 1

Listen.

Speaker 5

I am satisfied that the Secret Service had made improvements that provide much stronger safeguards, and that it is knowledgeable about the lapses that occurred, the failures that contributed to this assassination attempt being as close as successful as it was. I think the procedures, the protocols, and the practices have been improved. We'll see whether we're completely satisfied with him, because we're only beginning to learn about how the Secret Service is doing things differently.

Speaker 3

Senator spoiler alert were not completely satisfied with them.

Speaker 2

Senator, I can't believe I'm going to sit here and say this, But I actually think Blimenthal may have just been sold to Bill of Goods and he was lied to about a secret service. He thinks change, things have changed and they're adequate now, but now after the second assassination attempt, clearly they're they're not. And and did the Secret Service just straight apply to him?

Speaker 3

Well, I don't know. I don't know what is what Blumenthal's investigation uncovered. He said there's a report coming out. I hope it comes out now, very very soon. I agree with what he said about the urgency of getting information out. Look, it is my view that one of the major drivers in these lapses is is partisan bias. Is the fact that that the Biden, Harris white House, and Alejandro majorcis they they don't like Trump. They don't want to give him the recognition of of having the

security that that that that he needs. These these are the same people that repeated and refused to provide any Secret Service protection to RFK Junior, despite the fact that it was clearly merited there and and and so I would be surprised if Blumenthal's report focuses on the partisan bias of the political appointees I think that is a major factor in leading them to make decisions that have

left President Trump woefully underprotected. But listen, all of these questions were clear two months ago, and I want to

because it feels a little bit like Groundhog Day. You and I did this on another Sunday night with another assassination attempt, and just following that, the acting Director of the Secret Service testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and I questioned him, and you know what striking is is just about every single question I asked him two months ago remains entirely salient today and even more so now that this has happened twice. So I want to go

back and let's listen again to that cross examination. This is the acting director of the Secret Service, shortly after the first assassination attempt on President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. Mister Row, thank you for being here. I agree with what you said at the outset that the individual Secret Service agents demonstrated remarkable personal courage putting their bodies in between the line of sight of the shooter and the president. That being said, the bravery of the line agents is

quite different from the decisions of Secret Service leadership. Secret Service leadership committed catastrophic security failures, indeed the worst security failures for the Secret Service since nineteen eighty one, since the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan. It is incumbent upon this committee to determine why those security failures happened.

Just after the shooting, Secret Service put out an official statement from your spokesperson that says, there's an untrue assertion that a member of the former president's team us at additional security resources, that those were rebuffed. This is absolutely false. In fact, we added protective resources and technology and capabilities as part of the increased campaign travel tempo.

Speaker 6

Was this tweet accurate with respect to Butler, Pennsylvania? It is accurate, sir.

Speaker 3

It is accurate that the Trump team had not asked for additional security and had not been rebuffed.

Speaker 6

If you're talking about Butler, Pennsylvania, all assets requested were approved. If you're talking about the media reporting of assets requested, there were times when assets were unavailable and not able to be filled, and those gaps were staffed with state and local law enforcement tactical assets.

Speaker 3

So I'm reading from the Washington Post, July twentieth, twenty twenty four, Secret Service said to a denied request for more security at Trump events. The opening paragraph, top officials of the US Secret Service repeatedly denied requests for additional resources in personnel sought by Donald Trump's security detail in the two years leading up to his attempted assassination, according

to four people familiar with the requests. Is that right that repeatedly the Trump detail asked for more resources and repeatedly Secret Service leadership turned that down.

Speaker 6

That is not accurate. Senator assets are requested. There's a process that has made.

Speaker 3

How many requests did the Trump team or the Trump detail ask for?

Speaker 6

I can get you that number in a Q.

Speaker 3

You don't know now, so I can speak to the ones.

Speaker 6

That reported in the Washington Post and we can go through them if you like.

Speaker 3

But you don't know how how many requests there were.

Speaker 6

In general, how many requests since twenty twenty one that the former Trump detail has made a requests for asking You've.

Speaker 3

Had two weeks you had a spokesperson put something out that is false on its face. By the way, did you approve this statement when it went out?

Speaker 6

I don't know if I did or didn't say.

Speaker 3

Has this spokesperson? Is he still employed to he still have still so he lied on behalf of the Secret Service. He's still has a job. Did your predecessor, the former director, does she approve the statement? Senator?

Speaker 6

Our comms team they send out statements, they do deconflict them, and they put them out.

Speaker 3

Did she approve this statement? I don't know if she did or did not. And you don't know if you did either.

Speaker 6

I don't recall approving it, Senator.

Speaker 3

Will you commit to provide this committee in writing every written request for additional resources from the Trump campaign or the Trump Detail and every response from Secret Service?

Speaker 6

Senator, I will commit to providing responses and getting you the information that you are seeking.

Speaker 3

Me ask you something, and who makes the decision to those requests? Did you make that decision?

Speaker 6

Which requests are you talking about the ones that written a lot in the post?

Speaker 3

Yes?

Speaker 6

The processor is that a detail will make a request for either staffing technical assets. That is handled between the field office and the d detail. It goes up to a logistics office between Okay.

Speaker 3

So there's a bureaucracy. Is there a decision maker? It's not a bureaucracy, Sator, it's the person that's the decision maker is there one.

Speaker 6

Senator, it's a conversation. It's not just an absolute yet. So let me tell you what I believe.

Speaker 3

I believe that the Secret Service leadership made a political decision to deny these requests, and I think the Biden administration has been suffused with partisan politics. Did the same person who denied the request for additional security to President Trump also repeatedly deny the request for security to Robert F. Kennedy Junior, whose father was murdered by an assassin and whose uncle was murdered by an assassin. Did the same person make that decision? Senator?

Speaker 6

What I will tell you is that secret Service agents are not political.

Speaker 3

Okay, you're not answering my you know what leadership by the president, leader kep appointed by the president is political. I have a simple question, yes or no? Did the same person deny the Trump requests that also denied the RFK request. That's a yes or no question, Senator.

Speaker 6

That is not a yes or no question.

Speaker 3

One.

Speaker 6

There was a process for a candidate nominee to receive protection?

Speaker 3

Is there a by Cameron?

Speaker 6

Does a bike style body artisan process that they.

Speaker 3

By cameral bipartisan process? What can candidate not in Congress. I don't have a cameral.

Speaker 6

Mister Kennedy submitted a request that was referred over to the Sea Pack.

Speaker 3

Okay, you're refusing to answer the question. Let me ask because the failures on that day were catastrophic. By the way, is it true that on the day of the of the Butler event that Secret Service transferred agent for President Trump to the First.

Speaker 6

Lady H No, sir, that's not true.

Speaker 3

That's been widely reported. It's not true.

Speaker 6

There was one airport agent that actually went on the MAMPI request for the Trump detail. They handled the arrival at the airport.

Speaker 3

What is the relative what was the relative size of the Trump detail compared to the detail that is assigned to the president of.

Speaker 1

The First Lady?

Speaker 3

Senator?

Speaker 6

The former president travels with a full shift just like the president.

Speaker 3

What's the red so the exact same size? Is that your testimony that the President Trump had the same size detail that President Biden has.

Speaker 6

On the day of in Butler, the agent surrounding him. It is the same number of agents surrounding the president today. There is a difference between the sitting president who also not.

Speaker 3

Only and you're using president in a way that is not clear. Is it your testimony that in Butler, Pennsylvania, Donald Trump had the same number of agents protecting him that Joe Biden has at a comparable event.

Speaker 6

I'm telling you the shift, the close protection shift surrounded. Yes, or you asked me, Senator, and I'm trying to answer it.

Speaker 3

You are not answering it. Is it the same number of agents or not?

Speaker 6

Senator, there is a difference between the sitting president of the United States, and.

Speaker 3

What's the difference?

Speaker 6

The difference two x three x five national command authority to launch a nuclear strike?

Speaker 3

I'm not ever assets how many more? I will wait the president. That's a former. Well, you were refusing to add a number of secret servers. Stop interruption, Stop interrupting me, go ahead, refusing to answer clear and direct questions. I am asking the relative difference in the number of agents between those assigned to Donald Trump and those assigned to Joe Biden. I'm not asking why you assign more to Joe Biden. I'm asking is the difference? Is it two X? Is it three X? Is it five X? Is it

ten X? Senator?

Speaker 6

I will get you that number so you can see it with your own eyes.

Speaker 1

It's sad Senator.

Speaker 2

But this seems now more relevant than it was after the first assassination attempt. The lack of answers, and by the way, you asked these questions on seven point thirty, if I'm not mistaken, so did you ever actually get the answers to all the questions where he said I will get that for you.

Speaker 3

Nothing, nothing whatsoever. He provided absolutely nothing. I asked the Secret Service in writing. They have not responded to my questions in writing. Assume they'll do it sometime within the next century. But what he said in that hearing, I will get that information to you. We are sitting here in mid September and he has still not gotten it. And it is a sense of a complete lack of accountability. Now, look what they're doing right now is a massive cya.

They're trying to cover their own rear ends. But the problem is with the senior decision making, and I believe the partisan politics that has been infused into the senior decision making. That is why I want to reiterate my call today the Biden Harris administration should announce that they are assigning a full presidential Secret Service detail to Donald J.

Speaker 1

Trump.

Speaker 3

And and by the way, let me be clear on a little a sleight of hand that the acting director tried to try to pull in that hearing. When I asked, are the same number of agents assigned or what was the relative number of agents? He said, oh, the same number of agents are in the close protective shift, And he was trying to be really clever there. I think he thought he was clever. So the close protective shift are the agents that are assigned immediately on the body

of the protect tee. So I assume he was accurate that both Biden and Trump the immediate circle around him is the same number of agents. What is different is the way the Secret Service works is in concentric circles perimeters of protection.

Speaker 1

So there's a close detail of a.

Speaker 3

Number of agents around the protect tee, but then with a full presidential protection, there's an intermediate perimeter that they locked down and there's a broader perimeter. The broader perimeter presumably would have caught this sniper on the golf course

who was trying to assassinate President Trump. And so the the acting director was trying to be cute by saying, well, the immediate shift, the close protective details identical, and look, everyone understands right now that there are markedly fewer Secret Service agents protecting Donald Trump than are protecting Joe Biden, which is amazing because his best I can tell all Joe Biden does is sleep on the beach in Delaware.

But nonetheless we still don't know. And you know, Ben, there was a reason I did not ask at that hearing. I didn't ask the acting director how many agents were assigned to Trump, and the reason I didn't ask that and I didn't ask how many are assigned to Biden. And the reason I didn't is he would have reasonably declined to answer that that that giving that information could compromise the security that protect Tee. So I can tell you in my written questions, I have asked that specific question,

how many agents? Give you the number? And I said that answer can be given as law enforcement confidential, so that it will not be made public because that shouldn't be made public. There's there's some details about security that should not be in the public domain. That's why I asked the question. I did give me the relative order of magnitude. Is it twice as many?

Speaker 1

Is it three X?

Speaker 3

Is it five X? Is it ten X? And he adamantly refused to answer that question, and to this day, he has not answered that question sooner.

Speaker 2

Finally, I want to just talk about the media coverage of this second assassination attempt, and I can't even believe that it's gotten to this point. And in fact, let's just look over the last like three days. This morning on Jensaki Show on MSNBC, you had a congresswoman that said, quote, Trump is the guy that stokes domestic terrorism. The problem

isn't that people coming in but this guy. You then add MSNBC's Alex Argue quote, the Trump campaign needs to turn down the rhetoric now that Donald Trump has been shot at for the second time in three months, blaming Donald Trump for this. There's another example, and that's not enough for you. You also had people on TV referring to Donald Trump and implying that he was, you know, basically kind of like Hitler. And so this MSNBC guest said, quote,

Donald Trump is exactly like Hitler. Just let's just quote it like it's supposed to be quoted. This is the rhetoric that's on TV right now. And they even say today, well, maybe Donald Trump needs to stop playing golf outside for a while, somehow implying what's his fault, He's exposing himself to assassins.

Speaker 3

Well, we are, unfortunately in a horribly divided time. But I do think that that personal rhetoric, the demonization of the left, but by the left of Donald Trump, has reached a level that we'd never seen before. And I think that kind of vicious rhetoric it it it bears fruit. People listen to the rhetoric when they hear people people describe him as another Hitler. Unfortunately, it increases the chances that some lunatic is going to act on that. And

and and listen. I want to close this this podcast the way we opened by by by giving thanks to God, giving thanks that that God protected Donald Trump. Uh. I talked with you at in Milwaukee and at the at the Republican convention. How I visited with Trump right right after the shooting and Butler, Yeah, and and and he said to me there very quietly and in he just said, God saved me for a reason. And there was there was a quiet introspection about it that I would say

is not typical of how President Trump behaves. And I think for the second time in just over two months, President Trump has been protected. I am grateful for that protection. I'm grateful for him, but I'm also grateful for the country. UH. To to have a presidential election decided by an assassin, decided by murder, is is the ultimate affront to democracy.

It is and it is an attack at the very essence of our constitution and the rule of law and the sovereignty of the We we the people to choose our leaders, and and so you know today I'm just I'm grateful for God's protection on President Trump. And let me be clear, I'm grateful for God's protection on Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and on our leaders in both parties.

You and I are both Christians, and the Bible commands us to pray for our leaders, and so I pray for our leaders, even even if I disagree with them strongly. I'm grateful for that protection. And I'm grateful for God's protection over our nation. This is a time, especially when when we need to be one nation under God.

Speaker 1

Aimen to that.

Speaker 2

Don't forget the Center and I do this show Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. We are going to keep you updated on this story. I have a feeling for Wednesday, We're going to have a lot more info and a lot more to say on this, so we will have all of that for you on Wednesday as well, So hit that subscribe auto download button. Please share this podcast with your family and your friends as well and the Center. I will see you back here on Wednesday morning.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast