Trump And Iran, Iran's Nuclear Program, ICE Farm Raids Continue

you

President Trump campaigned to get the United States out of foreign wars. He's now considering whether to join Israel's campaign against Iran. What are the risks abroad and the political costs at home? I'm Steve Inskeep with A. Martinez, and this is Up First from... NPR News. Israel asserts that Iran is making a big new push to make a nuclear bomb and that they're on the verge of success.

has said otherwise. They assert that Iran suspended its weapons program more than 20 years ago, so who's right? And the White House is sending mixed messages about how it'll enforce immigration orders for agricultural workers. President Trump promised to find solutions for farmers, but ISIS... Officers are still targeting workplaces such as meatpacking plants and dairy farms. Stay with us. We've got all the news you need to start your day.

The House of Representatives has approved a White House request to claw back two years of previously approved funding for public media. The rescissions package now moves on to the Senate. This move poses a serious threat to local stations and public media as we know it. Please take a stand for public media today at goacpr.org. Thank you. On the plus side, you get sponsor-free listening to over 25 NPR podcasts.

On the minus side, you get fewer chances to tap fast forward on your podcast player. On the plus side, you get to support something you care about. On the minus side, you like challenges and think this makes it too easy. So why don't you join us on the plus side of things with NPR. Learn more and sign up at plus.npr.org. These days, there is a lot of news. It can be hard to keep up with what it means for you, your family, and your community.

Consider This from NPR as a podcast that helps you make sense of the news. Six days a week, we bring you a deep dive on a story and provide the context, the backstory, and analysis you need to understand our rapidly changing world. Listen to the Consider This podcast from NPR.

President Trump once distanced himself from Israel's military action. Now he's taking some ownership. The president is talking in terms of we when he discusses Israel's war against Iran. He's even saying the United States could take out his words. the supreme leader of Iran, calling Ayatollah Ali Khamenei an easy target who is only safe for now. The president has faced some pushback from his own political allies who oppose American involvement.

NPR White House correspondent Franco Ordonez has been covering this. So, Franco, President Trump spent the afternoon yesterday with his national security team in the Situation Room. What are the chances of deeper United States involvement here?

Yeah, A, that's the big question. And that was being debated in the Situation Room, you know, the future of U.S. action in this conflict. I mean, Trump has repeatedly said all options are on the table. He's drawn a red line if soldiers are targeted. But he's also...

signaling the U.S. is already more involved than the White House previously let on. Just as Steve was pointing out, he's boasting that, quote, we now have total complete control the skies of Iran. He's saying we know where the supreme leader is. I mean, he's repeated. using that word we, blurring the line between Israel's objective and U.S. objectives, you know, and taking that kind of ownership has really raised more concerns of the U.S. getting more involved into another foreign conflict.

Yeah, so that's interesting because some of the people who are most concerned about foreign involvement are allies of President Trump. So tell us more about this friction. Yeah, for someone who has such dedicated supporters, it's really notable that some of Trump's longtime backers are questioning his judgment here. Trump, of course, has long been known for his America First message and some key conservative allies.

such as former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Trump's former White House aide Steve Bannon see Trump straying from America first and are pressing him to stay out of this fight. Here's Carlson explaining his position on Bannon's podcast War Room. My interest is really simple. I don't want the United States.

enmeshed in another Middle Eastern war that doesn't serve our interests. Now, Trump campaigned on ending long wars, peace through strength, he would say. I also spoke with Brett Bruin, who served as the White House Director of Global Engagement in the Obama administration. He said Trump... supporters thought they were getting a president who was going to disentangle the U.S. from overseas commitments.

What they're seeing, however, is a president who is getting pulled back in to a foreign crisis that another country started and that the U.S. interests remain somewhat... Okay, so how is President Trump responding to these criticisms? Well, he's pushing back, especially against Carlson. Trump posted on social media, quote, somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.

Vice President J.D. Vance has also weighed in on social media saying Trump has shown restraint, but that Trump has right to decide whether to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. Richmond, I remember like a few weeks ago, Trump had actually been talking about a deal right before the most recent strike. So does this latest stance mean that that diplomacy is now completely over?

Yeah, I mean, right now Trump doesn't appear to be interested in diplomacy. He told reporters he's not in the mood to negotiate. What we don't know is whether at the same time this tough talk is part of his strategy to further pressure Iran, because he's also said he may send Vance and Special Envoy Steve Whitcoff to negotiate, though perhaps not right now.

All right, that's White House correspondent Franco Ordonez. Thanks a lot. Thanks, A. All right, now we're going to take a closer look at Iran's nuclear program. Which matters a lot here because Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he ordered the attack on Iran.

because he believed Iran was marching very quickly toward a nuclear weapon. The U.S. intelligence community has been saying something else. It says Iran suspended its nuclear weapons program more than two decades ago, and has never reversed that assessment. So who's right? To sort this out, we've called on NPR national security correspondent Greg Myrie. So Greg, there are clips, video clips, of Benjamin Netanyahu saying that Iran is close to producing...

Those clips go back 30 years to 1995. Can you lay out the conflicting arguments here? Yeah, so Netanyahu has been saying time and again that Iran is on the verge of a bomb. And he's saying he ordered the attack now because Israel believes Iran was making a big new push to get there rapidly. He didn't provide details.

But he claimed the intelligence was clear and was shared with the U.S. Now, the U.S. intelligence community has had a very different position. It says Iran suspended its weapons program back in 2003. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard stated this in congressional testimony in March, said Iran was still enriching uranium, but nothing really new. This was very familiar ground. Now Trump has contradicted Gabbard saying, quote,

I don't care what she said. I think they, meaning the Iranians, were very close to having it. But here's the other thing, too, because international inspectors have been monitoring Iran's program for a long time, for years. So what do they have to say? Yeah, the UN's nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, says Iran has enriched quite a bit of uranium to 60% purity. You need to get to 90% purity before it's considered weapons great.

But that change, that upgrade can be done very quickly. If Iran did this, it would have enough uranium to make around 10 nuclear weapons. Iran would still need to take several additional steps to make an actual bomb. Most experts think we're talking about a matter of months, though. And now, of course, everything...

is changing by the day. Israel has already hit a number of nuclear sites, and it's hard to make a full assessment at this point. Then if the U.S. decides to actually attack Iran, what action would it take? Israel wants the U.S. to do one big thing, and that's use its massive bunker-busting bombs to hit the Fordow nuclear facility, which has this enriched uranium. Now, this is a major challenge because Fordow is... built into a mountainside which is a little over 100 miles south of Tehran.

If the U.S. strikes, the thinking is it would use this bomb that weighs 30,000 pounds, 15 tons. It's formerly known as the GBU-57 or the Massive Ordnance Penetrator. It's so massive. that only one U.S. plane can carry it, the B-2 bomber. And Israel relies almost entirely on U.S. planes and U.S. bombs, but it doesn't have this bomb or this plane. And Israel has repeatedly requested So do we know if this bomb would, in fact, destroy a nuclear facility protected by a mountain?

Yeah, that's an open question. We just don't know for sure, and there's lots of variables. The nuclear facility is believed to be about 300 feet under the mountain, and this is a mountain that consists of very hard rock, meaning it could be difficult to penetrate. says it's taking control over the skies of Tehran, so US planes could likely approach this nuclear facility facing little or no threat.

But it's just not clear whether the site could be completely destroyed. It could take multiple bombing runs, and there are no guarantees this would be the outcome. All right, that's NPR's Greg Myriek. Thanks, Greg. Sure thing. Bye.

Some other news now, a kind of clarification. The Department of Homeland Security says it is still targeting industries that employ lots of people without legal status. Employers in agriculture, construction, hospitality have worried about losing their workforces to immigrants.

raids and several raids last week heightened their concern. And even President Trump said he worried about losing, quote, very good longtime workers. Now DHS has clarified what they intend to do. NPR immigration policy reporter Jimena Bastillo is in our studios. Good to see you.

Good morning. Is the administration acting on the president's concern by calling off some enforcement? You know, there really has been a lot of inconsistent messaging, and that really stems from there's two schools of thoughts, primarily within the Republican Party, on how to handle workers.

without legal status. The first faction, you know, is really understanding that their communities and industries are heavily reliant on workers without legal status and that if those workers were just to go away, entire local economies and supply chains. would fall apart. And these are in areas that are very red, Republican and industries that generally back the president. But then there's this other group and it's the part of the base that wants to increase deportations no matter.

what, no matter who. And these are the folks that hold very high level positions within the administration, thinking like White House boarders are Tom Homan, Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. They're pushing. immigration officials to arrest up to 3,000 people a day in order to achieve the president's goal of mass deportations. OK, so that's the conflict. What has actually been happening on the ground?

So until recently, the agriculture sector had generally been left alone. But then last week, we saw several instances of immigration officers arresting and targeting the ag sector, particularly 70 people were arrested at a meatpacking plant. several farms got targeted in California and a dairy farm in New Mexico as well. And that really sent employers and workers into high alert. The next day, President Trump once again promised to find a solutions for farmers.

specifically posting on Truth Social that these workers needed to be protected. But then again this week, we're seeing the Department of Homeland Security double down again, kind of a bit of a whiplash for this industry. Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs

Tricia McLaughlin, has said that there's no safe spaces for industries who, quote, harbor violent criminals and that worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of their efforts. Meaning that these raids can go ahead. Anybody can be targeted at any time. Correct. So how are employers and employees preparing for that?

So advocates representing employers have told me that they continue to be concerned. You know, they underscore that they want to follow the law and many times they believe that they are. But they say that even if they think all their employees have work authorization, they know that doesn't mean.

their families or their friends or people in their communities have legal status. And that is what leads us into what the administration is calling collateral arrests, which means if one person has targeted anyone that happens to be around them. at the time that they're arrested.

Also gets arrested if they have, you know, lack legal status or something needs to be questioned. You know, we still don't know what the White House's solutions are for the farming industry, despite months of promises that there will be something. But that also means there will be. pressure on coming from some of these key industries in the United States that could be a hurdle for what the president wants to do. NPR's Jimena Bastillo, thanks for the update. Thank you.

And that's up first for Wednesday, June 18th. I'm me, Martinez. And I'm Steve Inskeep. Your next listen is Consider This from NPR News. Up first gives you three big stories of the day. Consider This drills down on one. Listen now on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.

Today's episode of Up First was edited by Dana Farrington, Andrew Sussman, Anna Yukoninov, Alice Wolfley, and Jenea Williams. It was produced by Ziad Butch, Claire Murashima, and Christopher Thomas, who get engineering support from Stacey Abbott. Our technical director is Carly Strange. Join us again. tomorrow. Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to Up First sponsor-free through Amazon Music.

Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Up First Plus at plus.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org. Decades ago, Brazilian women made a discovery. They could have an abortion without a doctor, thanks to a tiny pill. That pill spawned a global movement, helping millions of women have safe abortions, regardless of the law. Hear that story on The Network, from NPR's Embedded and Futuro Media, wherever you get your podcasts.

crypto and healthcare. Let's have a healthcare system where people are kept healthy and not treated only when they're at the most expensive moment when they're sick. Economic deep dives in 10 minutes or less every weekday. Listen to The Indicator from Planet Money wherever you get podcasts.