Selection 2024 with James Corbett

Music. Welcome back to Unlimited Webb in the last episode, we discuss the outside influence of fiscal policy, especially during is completely unaffected by power. In that discussion, we unlikely to change anytime soon, Blackrock veterans and Trump rein to Blackrock Larry Fink manager, to essentially design response during the COVID 19 wanton money printing. Such reflected by Fink himself, who Times earlier this week as matter. End quote, for financial quote, I'm tired of hearing.

your lifetime. The reality is, work with both administrations with both candidates. End quote, surprisingly honest admission election cycle. This year, it so many people who previously paradigm, especially during one of the two parties is once the worst of the two evils from reminding people that both them the repeated patterns all party wins the White House or angry rebuttals of how such

offer no hope. I would argue hopium, the political drug that political spectacle, while the funds both parties continue to using our money to finance build a digital prison that will livestock from the ranchers, pilling and offering no hope or our political reality is nothing key requisite to actually we believe that the only world is ensuring that that one party doesn't get back in the problems will be focused around the candidate who says the thing ultimately offer the same

whose real differences are pitches for those same policies. choosing directly. It is an person in the right place will the world of its ills. But while lie and will do nothing more the deceivers who have largely face. Joining me to discuss Corbett of The Corbett Report.

to my audience, is an award who has hosted the corporate produced documentaries, podcasts He is a true veteran of the has remained consistent in his decades, and is, at least in my continue to trust the most for analysis of current events. the unlimited hangout podcast, him back. Great to have you back things with you? Things are wonderful. Thank you for be on the program once again to things. I don't know if you getting crazier and crazier. So

Yeah, and it seems like some Because, you know, election without, you know, fervor of, of political party in their excited and also very agitated

come. Isn't that fun? So is iteration of us, the US, spectacle, that you find unique time, I would not use the word unique to you're described, that you're mean, the only thing that truly I every time kind of gobsmacks there can be no possible way to booth, yet again, to leave their suggestion box, there is always, spin on it that makes it the of your lifetime, this selection constantly amazed at the way narratives that puts spin on all their life and received

from. Have seen no genuine their life, but they will really the only surprising thing find different ways of reframing same narrative. You get to master will lead over you, or at installed in the Oval Office as happened this year, as it has apparently, mostly were unaware who's sitting in the Oval anything. He's not really home. actually running things? Wow, I back to the voting booth and placed in the Oval Office. what has happened this year,

here we are yet again. So that magic trick is to get people to meaningless selection processes. think that's that's the actually not participate, that's think they've done their best to situations and aspects of the people entertained enough, or like that, to keep people or to, have left the fold during COVID, that, sort of back in. And I

that of why this may be is media, and also like independent this collapse of mainstream public, and how a lot of these media now or that aren't mainstream, but were and are people like, you know, Tucker of the importance of over fact, that have been going on in this that feeds sort of the hopium written a lot about. So I don't you know why this? Some of the have allowed people to be sucked you know, as you noted, no matter what happens?

Yes, I do have some thoughts may or may not know, I've looked and its development over the that, to me, really is one of political, cultural, social like fish not realizing that don't realize that we are a mediated age like the one an almost structural level, the has been the disintegration of which was the creation of a we can all go back to our childhood, to remember there when everyone knew the the big

now. Everyone saw the big sports Everybody saw that that episode whatever it was, and everyone been noted time and time again, disintegrating as people have are now in their little bubbles. uniting shared spectacle that everyone back to the table is there really is an overlap and politics that is undeniable used to joke about Ronald Reagan being in positions of political mean, the parody of that even.

star Donald Trump lining up to It's I just find that has become the spectacle again, mainstream alternative media past, certainly over the past and interestingly consolidated like rumble, which I know, you people like Peter Thiel. So it same individuals. Yes, it was also taken public by Fitzgerald, and he is a very Jeffrey Epstein's neighbor, and quoted in, I forget what newspaper, saying, I can't wait floor with E speed. And then on death count is Cantor

interesting guy. One of I just find it interesting that increasingly Twitter slash x for a lot of these mainstream have made their their their bona by being in some way taken off platforms, in some way cry. Well, we've been censored, true and hey, you can catch us have you, which is an

you also raise the specter of incredibly important part of spectacle and the function that the 21st century, and for people concept I am I certainly coined that term, but I do think uptick in use of that term Since several years ago, back when I remember correctly. So the thing called Hope, which is a the human experience that we do the future that will compel us out, doing new things, trying,

extend ourselves. That is hope, is part of the human experience, unfortunately, the political hopium, which is the synthetic which in the exact same way give people the simulacrum of happiness, and once that starts bigger fix, and they will lives. I think similarly, the simulacrum of actual action in have to actually do anything. or create anything. You just button, you vote for a action in the world. And then

couple of years. And that, of hopium, and unfortunately, it the episode that I did, I framed phenomenon, which, as people may key messages of Q anon was, sit of course, exactly it is a meant to be in the audience, watching things unfold. And if position, you will be absolutely status quo. You know, what's interesting something like Bitcoin, for

issue. The same ideology that behind Q Anon, sort of like, sit being promoted to Bitcoiners, Fink and Wall Street have their whatever administration with makes it serve the state and financial freedom and what have horse, and it's so great and on to it and do absolutely absolutely nothing to ensure you want it to be, and let it be Trojan horse the whole system think and destroy the bankers interesting to see how that propagate that mentality are spread well beyond the Q anon

think it's interesting as it cycle, at least, that it seems previous ones. There has been an and people sort of of that And it's been, I think I'd this election really picked up kind of started with Javier that, Oh, a libertarians and all of these things. But really, far doesn't necessarily line up putting JP Morgan bankers that know, debt slavery model for the economy, among other things.

about that? Because I know that you're a voluntary you subscribe there have you've definitely circles, so I'm curious about Yes, well, I guess it really definition of libertarian, but understand does not have often put under that rubric, or the prime example of that is, know if, if gates is most himself into a philanthropist through the wonderful efforts of Peter thiel's greatest PR branded as a libertarian and to calling call him that for the all of his maneuvers have been

opposite direction of anything example, absolutely obviously, his fortune directly, actively setting up surveillance and against the public, which he leverage into political power JD Vance, he was an important team, and I had his own office installed in the in the White steering committee member of don't know what universe you is the libertarian, but that is,

applied. So I think anytime around as a pejorative, I would some sort of definition on the different people will have is no definition I can imagine that label. Well, it's truly astounding, supposedly one of the ideology is the importance of is on record saying that free losers, and that you should find a monopoly. And when he's tried monopoly directly with, as you security agencies overtly with know, PayPal co founder Max that when they were creating letter agency that would talk to

business. So, you know, I think well, and that's certainly not a think there's also an effort in these other people to sort of it really be what, you know, I done is corporatism, and his says, as someone who just successful capitalists or, you everything. And obviously not equitable, you know. And so capitalist sounds a lot like Neo style, corporatism, which, you not libertarianism. He's

drinking the state. So speaking of Mussolini, it was one of Perrito, who, well at any rate, Mussolini to move away from mindset, who seems to have been 21st century by poli sci 101 his theory of the circulation of that. And essentially, Pareto organization of society. He He elites and non elites, and he meritocratic terms, there are will achieve more in their life,

elites. And there are governing And he was specifically so people who were in positions above average in competence and And these people are essentially but there will be, there will be class, and some will be more general public, and some will be appeasing their own appetites at so essentially, it is the and to throw their support choice is to get to choose which support, and from that well, we people surrounding him are, on the. People's side and the

there. Or flip it if you happen it's the good elites on the whatever you want to say about sociological idea that is being to bring people back into that spectacle. Yes, and it's interesting point, began to circulate, the over the terrible lefty elites

like Mark Zuckerberg. I don't attempted to rebrand as a hair a little bit. Said, Trump after the first assassination as to go with it and all of that. of these Silicon Valley libertarian. That was the Valley, which we know, of was founded through military and what it was. It was an adjunct But the mythos that were fed is barefoot sandal wearing hippie Garage tinkerers libertarian in they were the techno tech, technology would free us democracy and all of that that. And I think Zuckerberg is

that. But Zuckerberg mentally a mean, obviously teal, was the founding angel investor into what it was. And Zuckerberg always listened to him. And I some sort of proxy for for teal absolutely, we could go back, 2016 in which Zuckerberg, for a bunch of right wing media say, you know, look, Facebook conservatives. We'll talk to our algorithms to make it better then suddenly you get daily wire what's interesting is that, election, he was kind of a that dealverse is sort of about

power. He's He's rebranded this if it actually works on Trump's such, as we've noted earlier, a than perhaps we had anticipated you know, discussed at the two throughout the world on things related to global technocracy.

Zuckerberg and we've talked a not so much about musk, I own cycles, particularly because by musk, who is very overtly and has particular ambitions for turn Twitter, or x, as it's now essentially will quote, unquote, human behavioral data farm that know, some of the I think it's you know, the mainstream referred to it earlier, some of have sort of become dependent on algorithm and sort of doing to get more clicks and views and

the musk slash dark Maga the side of of Ryan Christian, think Musk is laughing at the believe this act that he seems I think it is a political act Keep in mind, this is the same advisory committees back in 2000 Trump ended the Paris Accords. who's, of course, was a darling now suddenly rebranded and is don't trust him. As far as I couldn't throw him that far. you will. I think Musk is in it and I think that's what he's that Twitter has as you be, as in which you have to act and.

order to tickle Musk's fancy in way, so that he can help not crack down on your of crackdown, I think that could For example, one could well predominant narrative that that God, you know, Facebook and election. One could imagine a look at this rampant chaos on divide in our society. And if could imagine that would be the justification of further internet generally. So there's a out. And I don't know what game but I, as I say, I don't think I had some sort of political

years. I think he's just playing convenient to him. And as again, just JD Vance. Isn't just a Musk made his support of the Vance being the VP pick as well. riff there is between teal and much at the end of the day, as same puppets. Well,

I think they're, you know, teal and the network of people like Palmer lucky and anderil meant to be sort of the next know, military intelligence you know Musk is now with that. But then you have, you by Thiel and Palmer. Lucky, he He's very close to Peter Thiel that Trump supports over a previously, before the 2016 policy suggestion for securing

What do you know? And I think that's been being circulated that's popular, popular with Prince has sort of rebranded and establishment figure now, even death squad leader or was and he you know, Raytheon and all of inefficient and waste a lot of idea is essentially to use AI powered companies, like defense to teal or or Musk to do that doesn't overtly say that, but

being made, right? The argument we're the answer to Raytheon, this was one of the one of happened in 2016 the 2016 sure you're well familiar with role, was able to implant, for former Palantir staffers and Pentagon, for example, Chief of advisors to the then defense Palantir, and of course, it was that the Pentagon finally Palantir had been putting point, to have open contract believe, were formerly locked they wanted an open, open

that. And of course, Palantir contract of their entire company Pentagon as a direct result of sure, just with all of the ex around the Pentagon. And so yes, supplant the old military it with the sort of the teal definitely one of the reasons I heavy investment in this verse. Yes, I think it's

argument is not no is no longer wars, or no more wasting taxpayer money more efficiently faster. It's essentially what fact, and there's even been charge of the Pentagon. I mean, a point where that can be laugh, yeah, well, I want to laugh accept that that will happen. just touched on one of the most think, quite clearly expose the political spectacle that is not change people's lives exactly right. The the 2016 talking about, you know, ending course, was instantly replaced

NATO is great. We're supporting that, but more so the the old we don't need wars of foreign been completely and utterly example of that is, of course, the, show me the presidential against Israel, and is going to, Israel military relationship of only real difference is who will contracts to help supply the genocide in Gaza. And that's the know it's going to be lavender,

think it's going to be the Director of National intelligence official in the Haines, is, was a long time there you go. Before definitely you know, that's obviously very yes, every candidate, including candidates that have now, you now endorsed Trump, um, have essentially, um, you know, let's Palestine in the Palestinians.

competition, basically, with who Iran first and allow the US to reason, there's people that and all of this, but are seem to one of the main tenets of Neo one, is to align US foreign policy or regional policy goals, which, let's not forget, is construction of a state that has but formulated, for example, in documents from the 1980s that things as the overthrow of would eventually lead to Syria and Lebanon and Iran, oh, over the past couple of decades.

course, this is a plan, and one is even hinting at the idea broach the subject of perhaps whether the US should be even willing to put that on the

Yeah, and it's kind of mind you are to say publicly, for for either of the war criminals that you know, you're terrible, maybe it's just Twitter, I don't with, you know, Musk running it he's also been made it very Israel is doing. But, you know, you know, well, I don't know if a few years ago, when I worked op ed called during the early called the US has become a basically talked about how, also protests about like Occupy the there's been a massive the population and make us

agenda. And I don't know, it the ultimate end goal, perhaps. left cheering for it, you know, get Putin and then you have essentially, war with Iran. strike Iran? Because Hezbollah practically eliminated, blah, boggling how successful of a the idea that, like, oh, Dick that means that's the neocon

in the other party. I mean, it's going around are truly mind is also related to this effort of what the quote, unquote, Deep So for example, on the left, it just means, oh, anyone that uses qtard and all of these things. seriously, the fact that they're course, the deep, deep the term unelected bureaucracy, the policy to continue no matter But to the right, it seems like officials of the other party. So Kamala Harris are the deep prevent them from coming back,

of this stuff. So I'm curious this successful effort to different names. I guess perhaps libertarian, maybe. Or, you efforts to sort of weaponize the it's a good point. I think the head. Because, yes, I think the political spectrum, anyone state, and to the people on the deep state, you're you're a

polite society. However, I will to that, which is I, for editorial on Deep State rising, government, where I noted the Specifically, it was January of blip on the political radar, of this mainstream media had books, Deep State inside the and the deep state, the fall of a shadow government, you had known for its, you know, right well as outlets like the talked about by mainstream Bill Moyers had a guest on

Deep State. The Boston Globe was government that won't change no York Times was talking about embraced the deep state. The talking about, it was a bizarre the time, I was just pondering, Why are they bringing this, this at this particular time. has actually studied this issue, person who spearheaded the phenomenon, deep politics in the Peter Dale Scott who had Turkish, where there there was that exposed the Turkish Deep

was really originating from. But power between military and runners and all of that, and so and deep state that people like researching and writing about for decades. And so suddenly, in emerge into mainstream talking interestingly, as Trump took shouldn't even say that. It's a Trump sat in the Oval Office. to emerge. Yes, there is a deep everyday bureaucrats and workers agencies. And don't worry, guys, op eds and editorials being newspapers about Yes, the deep thing, because these are the

go crazy. They're not going to and whatever Trump tells them to in charge. So don't worry about became to the extent that the I think that is the way that don't worry the deep state is staffers who sit there at their for people who have actually Scott and people like that, politics of heroin and things connection between intelligence, mobsters, government officials. Obviously, I mean, this has been about, this is it all goes back to the

same nexus of power. Because look at it, we start to spectacle is a spectacle that is I've, I've made the analogy a the galaxy or the president of Guide to the Galaxy, Zaphod ridiculous character who, in the literally just meant to attention from the people who that they can get along with the ruling the galaxy, while this everyone in the galaxy is do think that that is where the person in the Oval the Oval Office, that that is our attention from the people still largely in the shadows,

has in some way been mainstream,

yeah, well, I think it's extent too, but I don't know. some of the political psyops turn to something that I think opposed to the other party, in it is related to efforts to anti establishment, when, of even his what the policy, the campaigns on show is inaccurate. phenomena of canceling, right? few years. And this idea of like been an effort to use quote, basically controlled assets that makes me think of sort of the meetings. And in the wake of

couple years in a row. Actually, with the public, and it seems with the with, you know, right course, have the guns, have been sort of pacify them and have Trump is the person who's going that the people that are armed, armchairs and stay docile. And I know, basically, by, by sort of that, oh, the deep state, or people, hate Trump, Bill Gates, much. You know, people like Q anon have sort of absolved either held account to any of having to campaign on policy at don't you see these people hate

much? You know, obviously he's necessarily right, like, if for example, and you know, you establishment and get quote, Americans to trust them, just big canceling events, you know. need to meet. It's actually a I certainly, yeah, I would be smart enough to even absolutely agree that that is the the over the top, phenomenon and What? What? Is here's the rogue Maverick that can't be said, and we can't gets, if he gets into power, oh, deep state. Uh oh, he's gonna, border wall with the digital ID.

know, he'll bring the good kind, not that. Cbdc, scary etc, etc, yeah, it'll be the private sector, not the public. It'll be from Bank of America. You no, that's, that's exactly the happen from the deep state's they would like the public to agenda, and to think, well, it's out there to destroy the system. can play out, for example, I Facebook meeting, back in I we're listening. We're not

boosting conservatives. And wire start get to get boosted in precisely because they know within, at least within the may be on the right side of that certainly not going to be anything, you know, anything that would truly be a threat to shouldn't be so similarly, honestly, I couldn't imagine enough to be able to play a role know that he is going to be and that he can be easily led had four years of him being exactly that and how he was led opportunity and warp speed and

took place under Trump. Do you have forgotten it because they is playing more so than the that that really is, that's it. they tend to kind of absolve was in power. Last time, oh, it then later they left power and that. He won't make those time, even though Howard lutnic I was gonna say two words. the Oval Office again. So, yeah, well, if not overtly,

but I think you know, this anti establishment credentials doing thing, anti establishment overdrive this year with the the that has sort of impacted Trump Because there was a before they would say, lack of enthusiasm completely unenthusiastic, but enthusiastic after the first there were a couple more minor, of that first one, and people know, quote, unquote true for, you know, any sort of generally, the official test, but I haven't personally opine on the specifics of those,

of them has been pretty thoughts on that, because that's previous cycles, I think some something that people think, it's certainly an upping of the spectacle side of it. What spectacular than the site of an rate, if not an assassination about the chess moves involved seem like absolutely this was a Secret Service had been doing protocol, obviously, what we saw

happened at all, obviously. So made to allowed to engineer to what would have been the result proceeded and Trump was actually know the calculus on that one, calculus from the incredible almost being assassinated and fight, fight with the iconic obviously, to burnish it of burnishing credentials with the maverick who's literally team. This is the man they're support him even harder. Because

from the assassination of JFK, once you've been assassinated, can, I can say that with some have attempted to set the record that actually, you know, JFK was Reserve. In fact, he was the Federal Reserve more power the silver certificates that certain prescribed intervals. over so that could be ended, this, gone through the specific he's actually written, and I people who, no, you don't earth. He was being assassinated

deep state. Well, I certainly do connection between what was example, or his threat to pieces. That doesn't mean good. Certainly not, yeah, he was very blackmailed, had people knew about it. His vice wazoo. LBJ, who later becomes course, you know, the Kennedy same networks that really, you my book of, you know, organize crime people that became Prohibition era because of

intelligence agencies. The, you of the Kennedys was bootlegging networks, and, you know, activity that helped make his financially and politically the ease of, sort of, at least controlling JFK through sex and which already, you know, at that well established by this least a few decades in of their, to control powerful people. You effort to sort of. Sanctify an extent, also, you know RFK as cleaner than than JFK on things that. I'm not sure I would say,

why are they shared? But apparently, not as bad, playing around with multiple eyeballs deep in the operations that, of course, Operation ultimately had some part to play I think that's obviously is whole story that is really not intimately involved in plans for and others. And although JFK, Operation Northwoods, RFK was various operations in Cuba. the story. RFK was not a clean

definitely not. I mean, really ever has been, arguably. particularly apparent as well interesting about what we've these assassination attempts, think it's sort of related to, I of mainstream, at least, within been qanon Talking Points or Kennedy, the Kennedy clan and definitely been a key part of JFK Jr is JFK Jr still actually Q. Is that Well, there's, I think Q, you know, I remember that JFK Jr is present himself at some rally,

Plaza. And there was a crowd waiting for resurrected JFK, Jr, lead them to victory, something idea of the Kennedy mythos there think you know the idea of, you attempts, of course, the last that was assassinated, you know, correctly, and it sort of links Kennedys. And then you have RFK comparisons about Trump to, you things like that. And I sort of an effort to sort of mainstream I say this not just because of because of sort of these figures

example. You know, now that he's of given air time to what would on his show at all, what are and not necessarily inaccurate, weaponized by key went on, in a example, of, you know, like that, absolutely a real Carlson had like Roseanne Barr like the Democrats are all pedos it's obviously not exclusive to sort of that out, which had years ago, been seen as a sort when the Podesta leaks and all of came out to sort of grab by some of those related Tucker's response is just sort

laugh, you know? So I think it's know, Tucker saying, like, oh us, but they're really demons, all of this stuff. I mean, can when he was on Fox? I don't his rebound at all, as I been funded by Peter Thiel, sorry, the name, the term rebrand sudden Christianity conversion well, it's related. Well, Brand ended up leading him to which, lo and behold, is funded of people in Rumble World, interesting. Well, okay, assassination topic, there's

just occurred to me. One of the used, of course, is like the the attempt on Reagan, which was air by May Brussel. May Brussel, 24 hours in advance. There's it coup taking place in the Reagan Alexander Haig and Vice something. And then, lo and ends up shooting Reagan, well actually, right after having the Bucha, yeah, there was, connections there. And, in fact, interesting analysis that I actually, it wasn't Hinckley Anyway, like, as you say, like event in American politics, that

well. But what was the real that on the Dale on the day who charge of the US government was enough, he just assumed charge when Reagan was out of office. Of course, it was the threat to charge here. And Bush from that presidency. He was running the VP, absolutely. And I think phrase, the phrase we always use presidency, the VP, right? And would that be? Of course, it think there might have been a assassination attempts? Hey, you your Secret Service protection.

a hurry. Can it so you better should really give vanderel Exactly, right? Yeah, something like that. Yeah, interesting. Well, I assassination attempt, Eric security stuff for the Trump influential he ultimately ends up winning, which I honestly given where they want to take seem to be very unaware that agree on so many policy issues digital ID. Trump is on record Exit tracking system in the solution to mass migration, Tories in the UK did recently.

solution to illegal immigration, government, and they're pitching online hate speech and cyber there's a lot of cross US and UK policy. And it seems quote, unquote, I shouldn't The Democrats, they're talking rather similar to labors as

solutions the same. You know, differ, and also market based I mentioned earlier, Howard choosing the talent, he said, one of the earliest pioneers of the late 90s, and has been very carbon markets, including with of called satologic, which is Treasury Secretary Steve is Joe Dunford, who was head of Trump, so basically head of the purposes and satologic has been for the Americas on the Bitcoin you're getting it sort of from

as the left. And really, you emissions trading was created by Drexel Burnham Lambert being the bank, and it was Michael Milken that fueled all these corporate corporate America and had a lot crisis, which, of course, CIA networks and what have you, anyway, that Drexel Burnham Sandor, he created Emissions of Bucha senior, and was also first Rio Summit in like 92 or based solution for quote, creating some sort of, you know, previously invented basically

few years prior. So it's really framed as a left wing thing, know, came out of the other side despite a lot of divide about, is real or not, between the left essentially the same right as is and surveillance money with you Elizabeth. Warren, for example, time for a cbdc, and then, you embracing not just Bitcoin, but is intimately connected to the stable coin called tether. He's treasuries, and that's now a

It's all very crazy. So tether way, with the FBI and Secret platform, and they seize governments like Israel and the live in the US. So it's really system. It's really just as

And, you know, there's infinite being biotech as well. I'm that, because I know you've rightly so, GMOs for a long office, previously, he extensively, and, of course, what was a GMO vaccine and mRNA speed. And a lot of his backers, Vance himself, are very invested you have someone like RFK Jr, over the last few years railing agriculture or in vaccines. Now, idea that a vote for Trump will and things of that nature. So your thoughts on that matter.

Yes, it's an incredibly be very interested to see how would seem to me that Trump is endorsement because it will politically speaking, but I be sidelined in short order in administration. I don't think long as Kennedy is continuing to think he'll get very far with business interests and how they But actually, I wanted to go issue, because again, as I know trillion dollar boondoggle that at the table is going to be snoot into it, and it is going if and when it is established

structures. So yes, one can players on both sides of the so be interested in that just one taking place just from this published a new audit of the between 2017 and 2023 as as much were distributed by the World be accounted for due to poor again, surprise, surprise. Where it's like the Pentagon audit and way, as it also just comes out turns out that the the has been taking place since 2020 course, has been due to burps, etc. That's, that's

rise in methane. Well, as it methane was going up, but the test for was the isotope of example, to test whether this methane, which, oh, by the way, whether or not this is produced human, ostensible human sources, turns out, oh, when you actually turns out that 90% of this rise microbes, not anything to do that means we won't have to eat that somehow doomsday will not is, this is the type of, let's just make a new trading exactly

right as an opportunity. And it's both sides of the remember derivatives, weather trading, course, in bed with the Bush family. So there you go. So yes, boondoggle that will continue to established in international

Well, I think it's going to resolve the US government debt mainstream US politicians, saying that the next president government debt crisis that in the case of Trump, it's from what he said, is going to coins, which gobble up They hold more treasuries with nation states. Now, I forget very, very significant and And of course, PayPal has

coin. That's likely with, you regulation making its way very much favor py USD, as it's know, decades in the making to may actually have it now, um, uh, something that I came across former VP pick Nicole Shanahan,

was formerly the wife of Sergey was, banked by JP Morgan, with was wrote a paper, of course, presidential candidate or really quantitative, about carbon markets, and how the US of carbon coin. And you know, money printing and sort of think there's going to be an government debt all over the pretty much been overtly said by of dollar stable coins, which is This cycle, at least, is a major and essentially dollarize whole overtly. So it's not formal

El Salvador and Ecuador. It's people use $1 denominated or like tether, instead of, you which is actually happening in unprecedented numbers, which is you have people like former being like, yeah, stable coins world. So definitely things that but lead us to the ultimate, CBDCs were heralded to do. So I things that people really need those opposed to the call it agenda 2030, or or know, in the interest of time,

solutions to this problem.

like has happened to me, if you opinions that we have done over invariably, a lot of the these facts means you offer no you're a doom pillar and a black don't make me feel good, actually are solutions to this in the introduction, to this diagnosing the problem solving the problem, and so note that both parties are their best efforts to sign up know, in my opinion, if you look two candidates, as we have done to sort of this, this for global governance, one of people should pursue is saying

directly and not really focusing politician B, or famous person think one of the fundamental be digital ID, which, in case the Sustainable Development cornerstone of that broader essential, they say, to all of the different goals that 17 Sustainable Development think also exiting the two party think the the unprecedented into the spectacle year after need people to do that. They two party paradigm. Anyway,

I'm sure you have many more. I have had a long running series in my opinion, very, very good. to talk about how we can solve Yes. Well, if people are hope they will go to quarter Watch where week in and week few week break. But I generally different aspects of the they all tend to, or I won't say lead back to the same, the same which is, I think yes, mass non

absolutely important. It's do not take the digital ID, that currency is going to be foisted that it's another thing to do learned during the scandemic easy to have high faluting let government tell me to stay me to wear a mask or to take the your circumstances. And are you? that is going to necessitate you interventions, etc? So yes, it's what you will and will not do. be prepared to live that out. past few years of craziness has exceptionally important that you

sort. And that doesn't living cheek to jowl with a exactly like you do, but it does in your area, for example, what people and networks and tap into in times of emergency, might be, that you can at the emergency. And why not use that sturdy communities from which hopefully actually create a using our time, our energy, our building up the the the beast constantly giving Our time, political spectacle and to all associated with the people that

spectacle. Wouldn't it be nice energy, intention and resources, community structures that we think that has to be a solution. Because, yes, I think, we have to do everything all at convert to living on clouds doing at all. Also, I think it's there are steps. We don't have things and go through enough will do and so, for simple idea that Catherine

was cash Fridays. How about just possible for you to fulfill your in cash, instead of using a car, form of payment, why not just everything you need that day possible, hey, maybe you can Thursday and Friday, or cash every day, and see if you can that. And that could be part of out what is in your community, the process that is actually into a voting booth to cast your suggestion box. Vote harder voluntaryist, I fundamentally initiation of force, and actually participate in that

what? I won't even care that step into that voting booth and or another, not only because count, and it will be counted by voting machines will tell you but also because, again, it's insignificant. It's when people entire lives, around this event years, as if it's truly energy that the real deep state function the way that it wants your energy and your resources. hey, you know what? Whatever go

whoever for whoever you want. I spend the rest of the four years talking about that, not doing And I think that is what is going to be the thing that we realize that the emergency is anything set up to catch us from absolutely and I would the is that I think there are also subscribe to the two party attention to be monopolized by includes people in independent mean, obviously, for reasons of,

job. You know, we're plugged in Twitter trolls all the time and happens, but you know, whether you subscribe to the two goal, as you pointed out, is to things that actually mattered that and not actually building any sort of solution that is people to keep that in mind, of social media, intentionally important for people to make since social media is just have US military studies from US Air Force, particularly, studying how to use social media

were drones. You know, people this stuff aren't necessarily have pentagon and intelligence social media networks to think tactics aren't being used, or you're arguing with online are generative AI powered bots and written before, on AI, if you book on AI. Essentially, what to have people not know what's have aI tell them what is real become dependent on AI to and we need to be careful those through election time rules that kind of things as well. So anyway. That's all I'd like to

thoughts, James? Before we wrap I wholeheartedly concur with something that I at the very contemplate. As it turns out saw, and this was several years much as 16 hours a day in screens, talking to people that's almost all of your life and very high that's, that's a something that at the very cognizant of and thinking about. part to help spread awareness of to tell people what to do with

make suggestions. So as I say, I solutions, watch series, and if the spectacle and where where going, I would suggest people documentary. But other than covered a lot of ground today. absolutely. And thanks so know you're very busy. You that you have done, and you've times earlier, but if you could find your work and support you, addition to this podcast. Sure Corbett report.com is the E, T, T, report.com. And I am on rumble, actually, Odyssey and

Twitter. I'm not on YouTube, of was scrubbed from YouTube on Instagram, tick tock or any either. So the best place to go there you can find literally and video that I've created over which in internet terms, I think doing this a long time, so yeah, you absolutely have been opinion, you were one of the joining me today and sharing which I value very highly with appreciated. Thanks to everyone If you enjoyed it, please share.

you are able and sort of echoing familiar, I have a major issue social media or other video channels or accounts. So in my either sign up to the unlimited unlimited hangout.com if you saying and doing and not what over, you know, bought think we'll all be better off going to be just, you know, I'm people as well. So important to thanks to everyone who supports on the next episode. Thanks very