Hey, everyone. Welcome back to Under Reported Stories where I cover the news that CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News failed to report on or just don't report on enough. And today, we got our first guest episode of 2025, and I'm joined by a badass woman, Natalia Torianski. Did I say that right? Yes. Natalia Torianski. That is crazy. It's like a beautiful are you serve Serbian? Yes. I am. Oh, I think I told you that. I am. Yes. That's right. I literally I told you my best friend is Serbian.
Like, the Serbs and I, we are just we're tight. So friends at home, I met Natalia at Amfest, which is, you know, the big turning point event that I've been rattling on and on about. And you were just telling me to tell you about, like, how you were doing lifestyle content, and you're just like a goofball on the Internet. And you secretly have conservative values, and you decided, like, f it, like 2025, I'm coming out as political person. How did that happen? Like, what was the catalyst?
What was the wake up moment for you where you were like, I'm gonna go from lifestyle, kind of rebrand more into this political sphere? The catalyst was 100% the November 5th election. I wasn't ever anticipating speaking on politics, much less conservatism on the Internet. You know, for the sake of your career, you keep it quiet. It's a secret. We're closeted we're closeted conservatives over here.
Anyways but then the aftermath of the November 5th election, on November 6 7th, the media induced mass hysteria that was happening all over TikTok, all over Instagram, people shaving their heads, crying, screaming, calling for all sorts of horrific things to happen to people who did not vote for Kamala. I was like, I'm speaking up. I'm saying something. I've got to. And so that's what happened. I believe I posted my very first political video on November 7th.
Wow. And how like, what was the feedback from that? Because it's just big to take that shift to the audience. You know, other people I've talked to that have been in this, like, more lifestyle or, like, more pop culture and then have tried to go political. It's like I don't really get a lot of backlash per se from my audience because my audience grew with me politically. Right? And sometimes they don't always agree with me, but were they followed me because I'm political.
Somebody follows you because it's lifestyle. How do you make that switch, and then how do people react to it? So the first play the first platform that I posted a pro Trump conservative video on, that was TikTok. And so that is the most leftist dominated social media app. So you can kind of imagine the immediate, backlash that I got on that video. A lot of the initial sadness that people were expressing, it was a lot of vitriol and anger and hate.
I do wanna say so much positivity, so much positivity. Good. And a lot of people were like, yes, I knew it. I knew it. Like, thank you for speaking up about this. But, yes, there were a lot of outraged individuals. There still are to this day. Every time I post on TikTok, people come back for another hit, but, we just keep pushing forward. On Instagram, I get a lot more positivity. I wanna say Instagram has a lot more moderate slash right leaning users.
The user base on TikTok is almost exclusively not only liberal, but radical progressive. Yeah. It's so crazy you say that because I've been going through that that shift as well and noticing that as well. And I don't know. Part of me is, like, am I being astroturfed by Mark Zuckerberg and being told, like, yes, Instagram and Facebook have more conservative viewers. Like, you should be growing on there. You should be doing that. But I've really I was always and this is like the hill I'll die on.
Back in 2020 sorry, 2019, like, the beginning of 2020, I got on TikTok, which was kind of before everybody else in the conservative media sphere did. I not to be like, oh, like, pat myself on the back. I think I was one of the first, like, at least first 20 conservatives to be putting conservative politics out on TikTok. And let me just say I got shredded. I was working at the free beacon at the time, which is a news outlet.
They do great reporting, but they were like, what the heck are you doing loving TikTok? This is awful. And I have been staunch in this for 5 freaking years, and everyone just joined the bandwagon in the last year. But after doing that for like, loving TikTok for 5 years, now I'm at this place where I'm like, you know, I have 300,000 plus followers on the platform, and I can barely barely get 10,000 views sometimes. That's absurd.
I put something on Instagram and it's like, it it does well automatically, like, I because and I have less than half of the following on that. There's just something going on there I'm not quite sure about. TikTok 100% suppresses conservative voices. 100%. There are so many instances of conservatives posting the most innocuous, innocent video, and it immediately gets taken down or the entire account is banned. I saw somebody.
They posted their golden retriever wearing a Make America Great Again red baseball hat, and they're not only did the video I saw that too. The entire account was banned off the platform. There is very intentional algorithmic suppression of conservative voices, and not only that, they, encourage progressive voices on the app. The more radical, the better. So it's not even left leaning accounts that get, pushed out in the algorithm. It is the most radical progressive voices.
Those videos will go viral and there's a massive, skewing of, you know, algorithmic boosting on the app. Yeah. What's hard though to just, like, kinda square the circle and I have two points to make on this and I'd love to hear your feedback is, you know, you saw Trump. You see Charlie Kirk. I've seen, like, my good friend Isabel Brown. She's a creator. She does very similar what I do. I always just say she's, like, 2 steps ahead of me. She's she's do done very well.
She's, like, half a1000000 on TikTok. There are these outlier accounts that do very well. But I would say, generally speaking, it's it's almost like TikTok is like, hey. We're just gonna pull a couple of the conservatives, give them the blue check mark, help them grow a little bit. And the rest of them, we're just gonna hope that their voice isn't loud enough. And then as soon as your voice is loud enough or you do something good for TikTok, then TikTok will help you and benefit you.
And I wonder if that is their political bias or just their, like, elitist bias. I can't quite decipher whether it's an elitism problem, a political problem, maybe a mix. Am I wrong? I don't know. I I don't know. But, the other thing I wanted to ask you about, like, more importantly is, obviously, tomorrow is January 10th, and I a lot of people end up listening to the podcast the next day. So a lot of people are listening today, January 10th.
Your TikTok is set to make its case in front of the Supreme Court. What do you think about this case? Like, how do you square your circle when you're like, they censor conservatives, but now they're at the Supreme Court talking about freeze speech. How do you square that? Yeah. So I wouldn't say that I'm calling for a ban.
I wouldn't say that even though I do get even though I do get frustrated with the app, but I think that TikTok needs to if it's going to remain an app that, you know, is in existence, there needs to be a serious algorithmic reorganization so that they're not actively suppressing one party at all times because it is I mean, people say that taking TikTok away would be, censorship and would be suppressing free speech. I think that currently, TikTok suppresses free speech.
It's not a free speech platform. Yeah. In its current in its current existence, it's not a free speech platform. So somebody I mean, there needs to be serious modifications with that. I asked them that. So when we are in we were here at Amfest for Turning Point that first day, that Thursday, TikTok had a couple of creators invited to come and sit down and listen to the legal briefing that they were gonna be reading tomorrow at the the Supreme Court in their oral arguments.
And so I I got to be a part of it. It was really cool. But at the end, I got to ask the legal counsel a question, and, you know, I was just being a like, I just had to be rude. I just had to ask a question. I said, how do you operate and say like, how do you go to the supreme court and advocate for free speech when you then internally don't pursue policies that are adjacent to free speech? Like, how do you square that? You have policies of hate speech.
Hate speech is directly in conflict with free speech. How do you do that? And their argument right now is that, Americans free speech is the right to hear things and to say things. Right? It's not just saying things. And so they're advocating that you should be able to hear things on the app, but the app also is allowed to make it, like, moderate it. And so I do think that they can make that argument.
Well, simultaneously, I think the Trump administration is gonna come in and they're gonna open the floodgates on, getting rid of some of these moderation. Are they even, like, law I I don't necessarily know if there are laws or, like, what's the word I'm looking for? Like, standards. Standards for moderation, getting rid of those and kinda doing what Meta is doing right now, shifting away from that. So I'm hopeful, but I also feel like the sale of TikTok would actually be really good.
But I What? I I just want it to be sold to the right person, if that makes sense. Like, I just wanna see Elon Musk buy TikTok. Is that so bad? Yeah. I know. If imagine if Elon Musk bought it and did a merger with x. Imagine imagine if x was imagine if they made TikTok into the video version of x. You should just buy Vine. Right? Do you remember Vine? Are you too young for that? No. I love Vine. I wanted to be a Vine influencer so bad. Oh my gosh.
I remember that that was such a random period of time, but those vines still go viral on TikTok because it was the best thing. Couldn't you couldn't really get political or do anything like that. It would just have to be, like, stupid, dumb shit. I loved it. Oh, I was in 7th grade. It was 2013. It was amazing. But I wanted it to say well, actually, I wanted to touch on Charlie Kirk on TikTok.
But quickly before that, I think that the best course of action for TikTok would be, so the CCP needs to divest and then, or they could keep their algorithm. Okay? They could keep their algorithm, and then whoever buys Tik Tok in the US needs to engineer a brand new algorithm and that algorithm would give the opportunity to, you know, rework censorship on the app. So long as Tik Tok has its current algorithm, there will be no free speech.
Yeah. I I think there's I think I don't think their algorithm is the issue. I think their AI detection algorithm that sensors people is the issue. Because the algorithm in and of itself is they send it out to a certain amount of people And if people like the video, it gets pushed out to more and more and more and more. It's not a bad algorithm. The censorship algorithm that goes in and says, oh, well, you said the word gender, hate speech.
That's what needs, like, their censorship algorithm is what needs to be modified and worked with. But, yeah, I totally agree. What was your point about Charlie, by the way? So Charlie's talked several times on his podcast about how him and his team were not able to get on TikTok for the longest time, for at least 2 years until March of last year, March of 2024.
They made a deal with TikTok somehow to have the Charlie Kirk show account stay up without getting banned because they were perpetually getting banned. So somehow they made this deal with TikTok, and Charlie Kirk has said since March, his account has gotten 1,800,000,000 views on TikTok. So, yes, Charlie Kirk's account is not only allowed to stay up, but extremely successful. But, that's not the case for most other creators.
He is such an outlier, and it's because they contacted a TikTok rep, directly. And there's no recourse with TikTok reps for most of the population. Yeah. No. That's the problem is, you know, we have a TikTok rep that kinda helps a lot of the influencers out. But even myself, like, I have to work through another influencer just to talk to somebody over there, and they can't really help me too much. They're not there's not an assistance. And that's why I was saying, yes.
Part of it is a political problem because the algorithm is the political problem, but then there's an elite problem where, like, not every influencer gets access to something like this. Whereas if you go on YouTube or you go on Instagram, like, I do have a brand rep for each of those platforms. And the fact that we don't have that with TikTok, I hope it's something that they rectify in the future. But, for the sake of time, I do wanna get into the stories.
So here is what we have got on our docket for today. I I am so dying to talk about Sunny Hostin's surgeon hubby getting in a bunch of deep shit for being accused of insurance fraud and kinda what the ramifications of that are gonna be. Plus, Pete Hegseth has been smeared in the media, and we finally know who's been corralling all these people to talk bad about him. Very excited to get into that story.
Plus, Ford, the vroom vroom car dealership, reportedly has compromised national security over its electric vehicle collection. We're gonna get into all those stories and more. So without further ado, let's get into the 5 underreported stories that you need to know. Today's show is brought to you by Based, my merch line, and we've just unveiled our winter line with a new beanie, a hoodie, a shirt, and a tote bag.
I'm an independent creator, and one of the best ways, if not the best way to support this show, is by purchasing my merch line that represents your views. Instead of just asking you guys for donations to fund my independent journalism, my business partner and I created a line of merch called Based Apparel. Based basically means the opposite of woke. It means you're based in logic, based in truth, based in facts. You get it.
Anyway, head over to basedandlogicapparel.com to check out our latest apparel. My personal favorite right now is our base 2 tone shirt, which I'm wearing right now. And remember, when you buy merch, you are directly supporting this show. And when you get your apparel, please be sure to tag me on Instagram so I can repost it. We all sadly know who Sunny Hostin is, that unbearable bitch. She is the host of The View.
And last night, I I think it was probably around, like, 5. I was getting ready to go on Newsmax last night, and there was this bombshell Daily Mail piece that came out about her husband being accused of insurance fraud. I pulled this article up, and there are so many accusations, but here are kind of the big ones. So Manny Hostin is accused of allegedly, he was getting kickbacks from another company.
So other company paying Manny Hostin to perform surgeries on people, orthopedic surgeries, and then fraudulently bill the insurance companies. And the insurance companies that they billed were the kind of companies that would allow and reimburse for Ubers, Lyfts, and taxi companies. So Manny Hostin was not only making more money off of insurance fraud, but then getting kickbacks from another company, allegedly.
And there are there's so many lenses that I wanted to view this story through, but first first thing that came to mind. I was like, Sunny Hassan. This bitch just sent 4 years calling Trump a convicted felon. Right? Oh, and the other thing too. This was all super fair. The New York judge that was sentencing Trump that that's gonna be sending him sentencing him tomorrow. Oh, such a good judge. Everything is gonna be fair.
So I'm just gonna assume that she's gonna be totally fine with whatever judge and jury are ruling on her husband's case because everybody here is just super duper fair. Like, how do you react to this? But also, like, do we take do we take the high road here, or are we just, like, shoving it in our little face? Yeah. She did spend the last 4 years crapping on Trump for being a convicted felon, and her her husband was just slammed with RICO charges. RICO charges have almost a 100% conviction rate.
Okay? So there is almost a 100% chance that her husband is going to be convicted, which will make him a felon. So she's about to be married to a felon. What do you have to say about that, Sunny? What do you have to say about that? I No. Seriously. I bet she's real quiet now. Yeah. Yeah. And the thing the other thing too is, like, remember that the Georgia case on Trump was a RICO violation, allegedly.
They I mean, they that was one of the most weird, crazy, twisted ways to get to a RICO violation. All of that has since been dropped. I didn't know that about the 100 nearly 100% conviction rate on RICO charges. The, Manny what's it? Manny Hostin? I'm like, Orlando, something like that. Manny Hostin. He has come out and said that this is, like, all lie, that this is not real. And I don't know if I necessarily believe him because I see it two ways.
First of all, we're at a time following the you know everything that happened with Luigi Mangione and the death of the CEO of UnitedHealthcare. People are very sympathetic towards taking advantage of or going after insurance companies. So this case 5 months ago looks very different than this case post Luigi Mangione. Don't you think? Yeah. Well, the thing is there's no rhyme or reason to who the establishment or the left leaning media or just the progressives all across America.
There's no rhyme or reason to who they're going to side with. They decide who is the victim in the situation and who they're gonna stand by depending on I mean, it's a case by case basis. And so who knows? They're probably go because because it's the VUE host, because it's Sunny's and it's Sunny's, husband, they're gonna say, he's innocent. Insurance companies are corrupt, which they are.
Even though insurance companies are corrupt, I still don't think it's okay to run up behind someone behind their back on the sidewalk and shoot them in the back. Okay? I'm still going to condemn murder, regardless of the corrupt insurance industry. I've been screwed over by insurance companies every month of my life. Yeah. Anyways anyways, they're they're going to turn a blind eye to it. I mean, they're not going to care.
And it's funny because, Trump's, you know, felony situation, the 34 counts of felonies, that was lawfare. Those were BS charges drummed up by Alvin Bragg and the corrupt New York legal system. That was absolute BS. This is actually credible. I mean, this is fraudulent health care services and, but they're not gonna care. They're not gonna care. I know. Well, the other thing too is I I don't wanna say, like, I'm never rooting for someone the demise of anybody.
I think that that ends up being bad karma to put into the universe. Like, I am not about that. But at the same time, I have been start especially, I think it really kick started for me with the Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively drama, where people are trying to take sides, and we constantly feel like we have to put ourselves into a box. Are you team Justin? Are you team Blake? Are you team Sunny? Are you team insurance company? And are you team Luigi? Are you team UnitedHealthcare?
Like, where do you fall? You have to put yourself in a team. That's how we think in this very black and white thinking. And as somebody that's job is to observe everything, I have found I wouldn't joy is a really mean word because I don't feel joyous about these situations, but I have found peace in watching people go at it and going that you both suck. Like, I don't I'm not team Blake or team Justin. I think you're both.
I think Justin Baldoni stands for everything that is weenie like and beta beta and men, and Blake Lively sounds like an absolute bitch. I love watching them go at it, because like f both of them. I don't care about either of them. I like watching Sunny Hostin and this Sunny Hostin's husband and his insurance or insurance companies go at each other. I hate both of them. I hope they bleed dry from all the legal fees, and I hope Sunny Hostin's husband gets the justice he deserves.
Like, I have found, again, not joy, but peace in watching people I dislike go after each other and not feeling like I have to put myself in a box. Yeah. Also, probably satisfaction as well as peace. And we're we're on the team of truth. Okay? We're not on the team of Jesse versus Blake or Manny versus the insurance. No. We're on the team of truth. The one thing the last thing I wanted to say about this, situation is that apparently Sunny implicated her husband last month.
Yeah. It was it was like the View episode on December 10th or something. She began to brag about her husband by saying, he is so selfless. He'll perform surgeries on people who don't have insurance. And then, you know, he still needs to get the money by billing the insurance company. People think that she literally ratted her husband out with that episode because less than a month later, they were served the lawsuit. Yeah. I because that lawsuit the lawsuit's not new.
It's just the reporting on the lawsuit is new. I guess this was filed almost a month ago. So we're gonna add that clip in, real quick. You know, doctors suffer because of big corporations as well. Doctors that wanna do good, like my husband, you know, operates on someone even though they don't have insurance and then has to sue health, health insurance companies to get paid for for the work that he's been trained his whole life to do. So yeah.
Thank you for pulling that up, Natalia, because that was a really important clip. I'm glad people now have insight into that. Let's get into our next story. So speaking of accusations, there have been a lot of accusations swirling around about Pete Hegseth as he's, facing a pending nomination to be our secretary of defense. And last year, he went on Megyn Kelly show, and I wouldn't call it a softball interview.
But, you know, they're friends, so it's difficult to give a she does a really good job giving hard hitting interviews, but generally speaking, it's hard to, like, go after your friend. And, he was saying time and time again that people were going after him or the people that were going after him were disgruntled employees. And now when I heard this just because I've seen a lot of kind of yucky things behind the scenes in this world of politics, of conservative news and whatnot.
A lot of the times when people say disgruntled employees, it is, it is not true. It is people who saw legitimate things, were then terminated for something, or decided to resign for something, and and ultimately it just I don't think the the term disgruntled employee is fair. It usually means that something went on that wasn't very good. But I also thought like, wow. There's a possibility, I guess. I I wanted to to leave the door open. That's why I said like 8 out of 10 times.
Like, mostly I'm on the side of disgruntled employees aren't disgruntled employees. But the Washington Free Beacon did a great investigative report and found out that one of the people, the individual, who has been slandering Pete Excess for years was a quote disgruntled employee. I don't know how else to describe this woman. I'm gonna give you guys the full details.
So Pete Hegseth used to work for this company or kind of operate the company called or as a nonprofit, not company, called Concerned Veterans for America. And an employee there, former employee back from 2014 was spreading claims about Pete Hegseth, about his time as a leader of that organization. And these are some of the accusations she put out. Okay? Promoting a frat like culture with heavy drinking. Turning a blind eye to a sexual assault complaint against another employee.
Again, clarifying here. Not against Pete Hegseth. This was against another employee that happened while Pete Hegseth was in leadership. And what's crazy about all of this is that the employee, stick with me, who was allegedly assaulted. So that Pete Hegseth was never the problem. And then she noted that the woman who is slandering Pete Hegseth consistently received poor performance reviews and ultimately resigned back in 2014.
So I like to hold space for both things, but at the same time I'm like how do you not see this as slanderous? Like what what are you doing? What are you doing, ma'am? Are we allowed to name the woman? Yeah. Let me pull it up, actually. Was there a different Kat Duggan. Yes. Thank you. I'm, like, I remember it was something Dugan or Duggan or something. It's probably Dugan. Okay. So this woman, Kat, so it turns out this might be an earnest instance of a disgruntled employee.
She genuinely was disgruntled. So these accusations against Pete, also from Kat specifically, they're not new. In the Free Beacon article, it says that in March of 2018, when Hegseth was floated as a possible nominee to lead the Department of Veteran Affairs, his lawyer had to send Kat Dugan a cease and desist letter because she was making false and defamatory statements about him. This is dating all the way back to 2018. Okay? This is this is 7 years ago.
And then the day that Pete's lawyer sent the cease and desist to Kat Dugan, The Spectator, Yeah. That was The Spectator put out that article. Right? Yeah. Yeah. Sorry. Go ahead. Oh, I was just gonna say, yeah. The Spectator published that defamatory article about HEXAD. They've been coming after him for a while. Which is so interesting because I mean, there are 2 spectators, so maybe it's maybe I'm thinking of the liberal one, but there's a conservative spectator too. So I'm like, wait.
Was this the conservative spectator trying to run something? In which case, like, I'm more inclined to believe it. Now here's where I fall in terms of, like, the disgruntled employee thing. When she's putting this out within 3 to 4 years of her of her, you know, parting ways with the company, I get it. Like, 10 years later, bitch, move on with your life. Sorry. Like, I know that's mean, but, like, I get it. I've been jilted.
Other people in the the media industry, in every industry, have been jilted. And, of course, you wanna get out the story, but sometimes you have to differentiate between your experience and the general experience of a company. Like, my experience at a company is very different than everybody else's, and when she talks about a frat like culture, that stuck out to me because, one of my former companies, Daily Caller, kinda used to have the frat like culture energy.
And a lot of people have asked me, like, oh, did you like your time at the Daily Caller? You know, it's kinda got like a fratty vibe, and I personally liked it. You know, like, I was in a sorority. I liked the frat like culture. It was fun. It was very free opening because, like, you could speak your mind without, you know, worrying it about anything. Like, guys would say things and nothing was offensive or rude. Like, everyone was shooting the shit, dicking around with each other.
It was a great time, but you came into that environment. And when you're running an environment like that, you do have to be picky about who you pick. You know, people have to fit the culture of that. So, you know, I I look at that. I'm like, I'm just trying to be analytical and fair about it, and I'm like, okay.
Cool. He created a probably a really fun cool environment, and then there were a couple of weenies that he should have fired instead of, like, slowly pushing them out in the way that he did. And I'm sure that wasn't even on Pete Hagseth. I bet this cat, Dugan, and Pete Hagseth have been in the same room one time, and there was 80 other people. Like, I don't think that this is entirely fair to be slandering the guy based on observations that you made.
And, also, a lot of, Fox News hosts and coworkers of HEGSAT came out saying that the claims about his heavy drinking are absolutely preposterous. People who were on air with him for 8 years, 10 years. Yeah. And that I have right here, Dan Bongino, Will Kane, Kyle Becker, Joey Jones, Nicole Safier, and Brianna Morello, they all said, this is ridiculous. I've worked with Pete for years, and he's not a heavy drinker at work. Apparently, he had one beer, on Saint Patty's Day at a work event.
That's something I heard. So so maybe he should be imprisoned for the rest of his life for that singular move. But If that's the standard, I would have been jailed, like, 4 years ago for pounding White Claws when I was, you know, working election night at the free beacon. Oh, scary.
Exactly. And, you know, Natalia, I I know that you're you and I are, like, newer friends, but people that have been watching for the show for at least the last, like, 2 months know that I was very against Matt Gaetz coming in as the attorney general. I just found him, generally speaking, to be kind of a creepy dude, but I Love his eyebrows. Yeah. I just find him to be kinda creepy. I don't know how to put it. Exert a photo of eyebrows. Yes. Exactly. But I'm like, I I don't know.
I don't love him. Something about it felt off. Something about him felt like not quite qualified for something of this position, and there were more qualified people. The 2nd nominee, I believe it's Pam Mondy, far better than, Matt Gaetz ever was. And so when it came to Pete Hegseth, I did keep an open mind about the allegations. But the more I dug, the more I I thought about it. Pete Hegseth, do I believe some of his accusers? Honestly, yeah. I don't think he was probably the best husband.
I don't think he was maybe the most stand up guy. But those things, a, I don't they can't be proven in a court of law. And b those those things can't be disqualifying to a certain degree because everybody has done bad things in their life. If we were all held to the standard of the worst things that we have done that can be proven by law again, I want to caveat that, then I no one could do anything. Let's be honest.
There's no perfect people in this world, so I was very trepidatious about where I stood on Pete Hegseth, but I am absolutely in favor of him getting nominated. Do you have to stand in the same vein or are you just all in? You've always been all in? Well, first of all, Pete Hegseth, apparently got the required amount of votes he needs to be confirmed for secretary of defense. Yeah. So he's on board to be appointed to the administration.
I do wanna say the capacity for leadership in an appointee is many times of more importance than their personal life. Also also if we're going to be Americans, we need to abide by innocent until proven guilty. Yes. A 100%. I literally could not agree more. Obviously, Sunny Hostin won't do that, but for Trump, but we we could do it for everything else. How about that? No. She's let's get she's guilty till proven innocent. That's how she thinks. No. I know. She's so dumb.
And that's how the whole host of the views, all of them. That's how they all see it. Okay. Let's get to our 3rd story. A lot of switch ups have been happening like we said with the Instagram, Facebook, and I have a theory and I always have this theory that when something big is happening, you you should start looking everywhere else because they're usually distracting you with something over here because something else is happening over there.
And that is exactly what I've noticed with Mark Zuckerberg in Facebook this week because first of all, you know, they they claim that they're gonna get rid of suppression, that they're gonna do, you know, change everything up. If you wanna hear all the details on that story, go back to Tuesday's episode. We just covered all of this. But Meta is now planning to use AI. And from what I understand, they're gonna use AI to generate a higher user base. So it's creepy.
Let me read the statement from the VP of AI. It reads, we expect these AIs, talking about them like they're freaking people, to actually over time exist on our platforms kind of in the same way that regular accounts do. They'll all have bios and profile pictures and be able to generate and share content powered by the AI and the platform. That's where all of this is going. So of course, you know, Meta has us thinking, oh look over here look over here.
While silently they're creating like this creepy AI robot friends for all of us. What do you think this actually looks like? Like dream would be Natalia. What do we see Facebook and Instagram looking like now? Well, first of all, how how soon do you think the United States government is going to grant these AI bots, personhood and allow them that second amendment rights and constitutional rights. No. Seriously.
They're going to be defending they're going to be defending these AI bots and their constitutional rights before Americans. But, anyways, okay. This is obvious. So true. Yeah. Like, they grant anything personhood except for Americans. But anyway And babies. Yeah. Exactly. But so obviously this is a bad idea. Okay? Obviously, this is a bad idea because usually we call AI computer generated accounts on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, we usually call them bots. Okay?
And bots are considered a bad thing. When many bots populate a social media app, there's spam comments, There's a bunch of BS going on. Anyways, nobody likes bots. I mean, social media algorithms are constantly being reorganized to get the bots out because bots are a bug. Okay. So to purposely introduce large amounts of bot accounts to social media, what are we doing? What are we doing here, people? What the hell is the point? What are we doing? Yeah. But okay. Then I'm, like, selfish.
I'm, like, I get it. What are we doing? Why are we rebranding bots? That's so dumb. But then I'm also thinking that I think this is just because TikTok is so top of mind, and I really feel like TikTok is, like, getting rid of TikTok really hurts the creator economy, and the creator economy is primarily created from women. This is, like, another way to censor and almost, like, put women back in the kitchen, which I think some people on here are like, fuck yeah. Let's do it.
But, like, at a certain point, like, the creator economy allows women to be stay at home moms and also provide, like, a second form of income. That's very helpful. And I was like, okay. So that's my first problem is now these little bots are gonna come in and take over the creator economy from hardworking Americans. But, also, those same people, they set narratives. Right? So then I was like, fuck. Is this a form of censorship?
Because they're these bots, they're AI obviously, they're gonna be able to generate and create content before people people, human beings, can. So they're actually going to be letting AI set the narrative for how stories are gonna be talked about because we you know, it takes time for us to create content, to, like, think of thoughts, to get the news out, to maybe to create a Canva picture to put out on Facebook and Instagram, etcetera. And AI is gonna be able to do that automatically.
I mean, that's just, like, jarring to me saying that out loud. You know what Mark Zuckerberg is probably doing? Okay, so you know how he's kissing the ring big time since Trump won, donated $1,000,000,000 to the inaugural fund? He said he said yesterday, Free speech on Meta! Meta is promoting free speech! Well, so he doesn't wanna get prosecuted for election interference, obviously, so he's doing this whole free speech charade.
The caveat is that he's going to create tens of millions of AI accounts that are going to promote the progressive agenda, drowning out the free speech of Americans with moderate conservative views. So, yeah, he's gonna be promoting free speech for all of his radical progressive AI bots. That is awesome. Yeah. No. That's you're so right. He's just gonna set the narrative in the way that the AI is generated and created.
I have said though, we again, we talked about this ad nauseam on Tuesday's show if you guys wanna get back and hear all of my thoughts about it. But I was saying that my opinion on Mark Zuckerberg has been that he has always believed in free speech. He's just too big of a big fat Winnie cock to be able to speak his mind freely. And so I think he's actually going back to what he believes. He's just been so afraid to do it, and that doesn't make it any better.
I think he deserves all the criticism that's coming his way. But I I fully believe that he does believe in free speech, solely because I know Dana White and the kind of person that Dana White is. I don't know him personally, but from viewing him and from watching him for so long, Dana White, who's now on the board of META, would doesn't need this.
Like, he simply doesn't need to be part of Meta's board if they don't actually believe in free speech, if they are actually, hoping to further free speech. So at the same time, I'm like, listen. Mark must have, in some capacity, a passion for free speech. Otherwise, Dana White would just like, he has a ton of money and a family. Like, what would he be doing doing this if he didn't, you know, somewhat believe in this.
But, anyway, we do need to move on to our next story, which is more crazy shit from the left. The left has been so hyper focused on electric cars and this climate change agenda, which is getting them nowhere in California clearly. But, they've been so hyper focused on electric cars that literally nobody wants, that they have created a fucking national security threat. This is absolutely absurd. This story, I know it's, like, probably the nerdiest story on the agenda today.
It had me enraged because the the company, Ford, announced this, like, $1,000,000,000 electric vehicle factory in Michigan. They were gonna get 1,000,000,000 of dollars in tax breaks and subsidies from Governor Gretchen Whitmer, total leftist. The big problem here is that Ford isn't actually building all of it. They're partnering with the Chinese military company to create the factor or the factory. And I'm like, the fuck signed off on this?
We are literally inviting the CCP into our backyards in the name of electric vehicles even though literally every data point says to us nobody wants an electric vehicle. People aren't purchasing them. Why the hell are we putting our national security at risk by working with Chinese governments to create cars that nobody even wants? The left loves the CCP. They do. They love the c Oh. Is that horrible to do? Like, literally, they are sucking the CCP's dick. Sucking off the CCP.
Sucking off Ukraine, obviously. Sucking off the laws. Like, America last is the left, wet dream. Mantra. Yeah. That's literally what I'm doing. No. Totally. Truly. They're like squirming in their bed at night. They're like, oh, America last. It's dis it's disgusting. And this just further proves it. No, seriously.
I mean, I already think it's kind of a national security threat having TikTok still be in existence with the CCP, our foreign adversary owning it, okay, And all of our data, that's already kind of a national security risk. And then, they just give $2,000,000,000 to CCP subsidiaries. They love China. They hate America. It's evident. And, yeah.
Well, no. To your point though about putting America last quick, the idea of an EV factory coming in, like, I'm not inherently against, you know, building jobs and creating jobs. The this is not doing this. If you look at all of the jobs reports coming out of Ford with AI, with automation, with the the creation of EV, which is costing so much money for the company because, again, nobody is buying it. They don't have the money coming in to put that money into the development of electric vehicles.
The government is forcing them to. Ford has actually had to lay off a bunch of employees to cover the cost of this failing EV plan, which is hurting Americans. So this is a very America last program, and it it pains my heart. It pains my heart to see this. I feel like everything that the Democrats put their hands on is America. Last look at what's happening in California, you know. I can't think of a bigger failure than what's happening in California while we are speaking. Oh, my gosh.
Like, I could go on forever about the the wild fires in, California. There's evidence to suggest that there's a lot of arson going on too. I mean, a fire just a fire just sparked late last night in Runyon, Hill or whatever it's called. There's arsonists out there creating a bunch of new fires. It is it's so sad. It is so sad that these houses are burning down.
And the worst part is the people who's who've lost their houses, they're probably going to continue to vote blue no matter who, despite the horrific, the gross negligence, and the gross incompetence of the leaders, caused this. Yeah. No. And and didn't mitigate it at all. There were ways to mitigate a huge destructive fire in LA, and they did away with all protocols that would mitigate it. It's so crazy. There was a video I was watching this morning while I was getting ready.
It was a newscast from local Fox. I wanna say a Fox 11. And the broadcaster was sitting there in his, you know, safe and secure studio saying, oh, you know, there have been rumors on x swirling around social media that there are no water for the firefighters and that is simply untrue.
Now, we're gonna head out to our correspondent in the field and then the correspondent is sitting there and she's like shaking and she's like, yeah, I just talked to firefighters and the firefighters are saying they have no water. I'm like, you dumb bitches. They have no idea. The media is doing such a bad job and again, I, like, am sympathetic to the point that the the CCB has access and has their roots in TikTok, and it's not necessarily the best thing in the world.
But at the same time, to me, I was watching everything that was going on with the way the media have been reporting on the wildfires. And I'm like, oh, thank god for TikTok and social media and axe and Instagram and all these places because Uber codes, access to, like, local safe houses, etcetera, codes and information about where to go for Airbnbs if you've had to evacuate your house. All of that information is not coming from the local media because the local media sucks balls.
Instead, it's been on TikTok and Instagram and x. I'm like, thank god for those platforms. Right? Mhmm. Yeah. So anyway, I do The mainstream media needs to be defunded altogether, but anyways No. I know. I don't even know who's investing in it. Literally no one. You guys should be investing in local not even local. Creators that are putting their time and effort. Like, literally, we have this is, like, us.
This is the spare bedroom of my apartment, and, like, I just rap on rattle on the Internet and whatever and that's, like please support me instead. Support us instead. And and you do more and you do more for disseminating information than MSNBC, and CNN combined. And The View. And Annie and Aloha. My View is actually, are on par with them as well, which is pretty pathetic. But, anyway, not for me. Not for you. Yeah. Like, I don't even have to get numbers. So, anyway, alright.
I do wanna get to our last story. Well, we have we have a bonus story for you guys because there's a viral video. We we have to I I would be doing you a disservice to not talk to this, but video. I no. Oh, I love it. Okay. But I I wanna get to this this story, which is that the newly elected governor of Puerto Rico, she got out and she read this letter that she received from Donald Trump to people of Puerto Rico during a press conference.
And I just wanna pull up the video because it's it's a sweet video, and we don't usually get happy stories. Let's play that real quick. The honorable Jennifer Gonzalez Colon, governor San Juan, Puerto Rico, January 2, 2025. Dear governor Gonzales Colon, congratulations that you take the oath of office as governor of Puerto Rico. I'm so proud of your resounding victory and incredible commitment to making Puerto Rico great again.
I look forward to working closely with you to realize your vision of a safe, secure, and prosperous future for the island. Now I'll be honest. It's not the most insane sound bite. It's, like, kinda boring. But what I kinda after I watched it, I was taking away. I was like, she is showing the people of Puerto Rico 2 things that they usually don't hear. 1, she's she's being the media. Right? Which we were just talking about. She's bringing the messaging of Trump right to the people.
There's no time for the media to go and put their little lies and their spin on it. So that was very helpful. 2nd, you know, she's inadvertently I know she's not, like, purposely doing this, but she is inadvertently showing leftist that Trump has no problem with women, no problem with Puerto Ricans after that whole Madison Square Garden fiasco last year, you know, that comedian who made a poor joke. So she was messaging in a way.
You know, I know these sound bites kinda get washed over because they're happier, but I think this was actually still really important that she did this. It is. It's what a leader does is he sends a letter to Puerto Rico. No. But I think that he exemplifies leadership in pretty much every capacity, and, Trump loves Puerto Rico. Like, come on. I know. I don't know why that that lie and, like, these rumors get so many to me.
Also, a lot of the people of Puerto Rico support the Make America Great Again movement. I've seen videos of people in Puerto Rico wearing the hat. Also in Greenland. You know how Charlie Kirk and Donald Juniors just went to Greenland 2 days ago? They reported and, apparently, Greenland is a population of 50,000 people, very small. They reported that there were huge groups of people wearing the red MAGA hat in Greenland. Yes. A 100%.
Anyways, but, yeah, after that comedian made an unsavory joke last year at the at the rally, they put this huge spin on it that all of Puerto Rico hates Trump. Not the case at all. Not the case at all. No. Not at all. And I think that this was really good. Even if it wasn't sincere, which I think it was, I just think it was good branding and good PR all around.
But, I just wanna share that story with you guys because I do get a lot of comments from you guys out there being like, Chrissy, what you have cover cover happier stories, and I'm like, do happy things. I'll cover happy shit. You know? Yeah. So, anyway, before we wrap though, I do wanna get your one your reaction to one last video. So if you guys don't know who Bonnie Blue is, you are a lucky son of a bitch because unfortunately favorite influencer creator. Please I know you're full of shit.
Okay. Pardon? She's an OnlyFans creator. Her name's Bonnie Blue. That's not even a real name, but she goes by Bonnie Blue. And she got famous for, like, doing the deed with she calls them barely legal teens. She got famous for doing a bunch of 18 year olds. Yes. Exactly. And, one of her little stunts has gone viral, but I think for the right reason. Let's watch this. I just wondered. I can't just see it on the menu, but where do I get the 5 guys from? The The 5 guys.
I didn't know if there was like a special room or you can take me out by. No. I don't think that's happening. What's after your shift? I mean, you I'd want to give you, you know, good a good rating. I'm a Christian man, and I'm working with my sister's marriage. I'm asking for what's on the menu. That's all. Genuinely, I feel like I'm doing that now. I can hold your menu if you want. Are you on it? No. I'm not. Oh. That's a shame. Can I say something? Go, girl.
First of all, that is sexual harassment. Yes. That's what I said. If the roles were reversed here and a man came up and propositioned a sweet little cashier, he would correctly be dubbed a predator and a creep. I don't know why we changed that standard because Bonnie Blue is I said it on Instagram. I was saying she's cosmetically attractive. She's not even attractive. She's cosmetically attractive. Yes. She's a female, and so we we give her a pass. What?
Honestly, we don't even need a role reversal. This is sexual harassment over sexual harassment. Really creepy. The sexual deviancy that OnlyFans has propagated so destructive to women in society. The fact that they have disguised OnlyFans content creation as some sort of female empowerment and liberation. It is so insidious, Chrissy. Yeah. No. It really is. When do you see a lot of people because I know you're a little bit younger than me.
Like, the OnlyFans came out, I think, when I was a senior in college. It would have been around 2018, 2019. And I remember it was a joke. Like, no one was actually doing it. Now I I do have a friend or 2 that engages in this and it boggles my mind and I see no matter how hard they try to be a better person, a nicer person, like, it's a demon that's attached to them.
And I'm I'm just curious, like, it if it's gotten hold of my generation, I can only imagine what it's doing to, like, people in the younger part of my generation. You're Gen z. Right? Yeah. Okay. All I know is that, apparently, a lot of girls on their 18th birthday, they enroll on the app and, you know, it kind of, I don't wanna say ruins your life, but certainly makes it more difficult.
Also, they also, they fool girls into thinking that they can be the 0.01 top creators on the app and be one of the ones at the top of the hierarchy who makes the most money. It's a lie. Apparently, 99.9% of OnlyFans creators make very little money. And so, they destroy their reputation, their digital footprint, their privacy, their dignity for nothing. I mean, even if you make 1,000,000 of dollars, to me, it's not worth it.
This is a much bigger conversation, but it's a very destructive societal force, the encouragement of pornography even independently owned. Yeah. I've been putting together slowly but surely, a video on the way that parents, the parents of these OnlyFans models have been encouraging this as well. And, like, oh my god. I can feel my voice shifting. It, like, makes me so sad. Like, my parents have always guided me, and I especially my dad, like, I really look to him.
I go and, like, ask for his influence and his guidance in big pivotal moments. And, like, to have your dad or your mom look at you and say, like, yeah, continue being an absolute pervert on the Internet so that we can benefit financially. Like Oh my god. It all goes my mind. Well, it's a perversion of the most sacred and intimate act that you can perform with someone. It's a complete it's a complete perversion of it and an inversion of the of the sanctity of it. So oh, my god.
And also, wasn't Pornhub banned in a bunch of states like Idaho recently? Yeah. I think you talked to me. Yeah. Well, anyways, that's a start. But, anyways, Lord have mercy. Lord have mercy. Oh, I know. I know. I hate to end on such, like, a kinda sad note, but we do have to wrap up. Natalia, you were awesome. Like, you got through your first big, like, a big podcast doing this. I'm, like, so happy you're part of this community. So happy we're on the same team.
I love that we're gonna be able to create contact together. This is so fun. So people that wanna come and follow you and join your journey as you go political, where can they find you? TikTok and Instagram at Natalia Torianski. And I need to I need to get my ex in check, but we'll talk about that later. Follow me on TikTok and Instagram. Okay. Perfect. I'll link them in the description.
Guys, if you are a real one and you made it to the end of today's show, will you drop the car emoji in the comments? Because the whole, you know, Ford EV thing. I just got I like to see who's part of the community, so please drop the emoji. Make sure you like and subscribe on your way out. We are so close to 25 k on YouTube, so go and click that like button and subscribe. I will see you back here on Tuesday. Bye, friends. Thanks so much for watching.
If you liked what you heard, please be sure to give this video a thumbs up and leave a comment about how beautiful, stunning, and funny I am. And if you want more content based on logic, be sure to click over here for more videos and clips of my show. If you have the means to financially support the show, consider purchasing from my merch line, Based Apparel, linked right below. I really appreciate it, and I'll see you back here next time. Bye, friends.