Why the Crypto Industry Believes SEC Regulation by Enforcement Hurts US Consumers - Ep. 378 - podcast episode cover

Why the Crypto Industry Believes SEC Regulation by Enforcement Hurts US Consumers - Ep. 378

Jul 29, 202232 minEp. 378
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Marisa Tashman, policy counsel at Blockchain Association, analyzes the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) decision to name nine tokens as securities and investigate whether Coinbase lists securities. Show highlights: 

  • why the SEC named tokens as securities in an insider trading case where no exchanges or token teams are listed as defendants 
  • what happens if the Coinbase insider trading case is settled or goes to court
  • why the SEC’s actions should be considered “regulation by enforcement” 
  • whether there is any process to force the SEC to reveal its reasoning for calling a token a security
  • why Marisa thinks the SEC is actively harming US investors with its crypto policy
  • how Coinbase is handling the SEC’s investigation
  • what Marisa thinks of Coinbase’s listing process
  • why the Cynthia Lummis-led crypto regulatory framework is a good start
  • what Marisa believes will happen in the crypto regulatory landscape in the near future
Thank you to our sponsors!

1inch: https://1inch.io/

Crypto.com: https://crypto.onelink.me/J9Lg/unconfirmedcardearnfeb2021 

 

Episode Links

 

Marisa Tashman

 

Blockchain Association

 

Coinbase

 

SEC Regulation by Enforcement Response

 

Gillibrand x Lummis Crypto Regulatory Framework

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android