Good afternoon. It's Friday the 14th of March 2025, just after 1:00 and welcome to UK called News. I'm your host, Mike Robinson. Joining me today in the studio is Patrick Hennigson. Welcome to the programme, Patrick. Great to be with you, Mike. And by video link, we have Mark Anderson.
Now later in the programme, we're going to be covering the NHS England closure and James Rogusky will be joining us to discuss vaccines and so on. But we're going to begin with the response from Russia to the suggestion of a ceasefire. So yesterday, Putin was meeting with President Alexander Lukashenko, who's, of course the president of Belarus. And he was, Putin rather, was answering questions from the media about the ceasefire plan presented by the US and Ukraine.
And he agreed in principle, but perhaps not in the specifics. So here's let's have a look at what he said here. We are also in favour of it, but there are nuances. The idea itself is right. So in other words, there should be peace. Well, we think everybody agrees on that. But he went on to say this. He said, I must sorry. I think we must talk them over with our American colleagues and partners, perhaps have a telephone conversation with President Trump and discuss them
with him. These are the plans we agree with. The proposals to cease hostilities proceed from the assumption that the cessation should lead to long term peace and eliminate the root causes of the crisis. We also want to guarantees that the 30. Sorry that during the 30 day ceasefire Ukraine will not conduct mobilisation and not train soldiers and will not receive weapons.
And he pointed out that Russian troops are currently advancing along the entire 2000 kilometre frontline of the war with Ukraine and halting military action would disrupt ongoing operations. And he said that Ukrainian forces could use a ceasefire period to regroup, receive more weapons, train fresh recruits. And so he said. So how would these 30 days be used for forced mobilisation to continue in Ukraine, for more weapons to be supplied there, for retraining the mobilised units?
Or would none of this be done? And this is a good point, Patrick. The West has, well the West has formed here because of the Minsk agreements, as you've talked about before, being a stalling tactic for war preparations. And of course we have Odessa and the 100 year pact. Well, quite right, Mike. And that's another sort of thing that people aren't paying attention to.
Before Joe Biden left office, before Trump was sworn in, you have this 100 year deal signed between Britain and Zelensky and that was Biden in the globalists and NATO giving the nod basically to Starmer saying go ahead and put that one in there as a placeholder. So you have a special boat services, SBS sending their teams in to occupy 8 ports around Odessa. They're clearly digging in for some sort of, you know, operation or to defend that
city. Because everybody knows, Mike, once Odessa falls, that's the end of NATO's southern flank. It's all over. You might as well close up the organisation at that point, no matter what you put in Romania. We'll get on to Romania in a minute, Mike. But you know, what's interesting about this is, and we'll see Keir Starmer's statement on this.
This deal was designed to fail. This is like they took they asked the Israelis for advice on how to do negotiations because this is a typical Israeli job, which is it's a perfectly good deal. And we the balls in your court, they've all tweeted out this slogan. Mike, if you noticed the balls in Russia's court, the balls Ursula Vanderline, Starmer even released it. Rubio, they all said the same thing, all the influences on Twitter. So it's a total Israeli style
negotiations. We've offered Russia a perfectly good deal. So they're treating Russia like Hamas. It's the same thing. We've offered Hamas a perfectly good deal, but they've rejected it. So what can more can we do? And So what does this mean? Sanctions stay in place, aid to Ukraine stays in place. The money keeps flowing. The intelligence sharing continues. Basically, this is the same as Biden.
There's no material change from Joe Biden in Ukraine to Trump in Ukraine. So we are back to default war of attrition status quo. Keep the war going. So let's have a look at what Keir Starmer had to say yesterday. And that's why everything that we're doing in relation to Ukraine is so important. And you've seen the developments in the recent weeks, developments this week going on even today.
Because I profoundly believe that if we don't secure a just peace and a lasting peace, then that insecurity which we've already felt will continue. And that means here, higher prices, higher bills, the cost of living crisis going on for even longer, if you like, a chokehold on our future, which will be much, much harder for us to tackle. And look, we know some basics. Putin's appetite for conflict and for chaos is already there and it will only grow.
And Russia is already menacing our skies, our waters, our streets and our national security. And that's why I believe the fundamental task of politics right now is to take the tough decisions on security. And that's why we raised our defence spending, which we also need to use as an opportunity to renew our communities. So you notice there, he said, uh, our skies, our waters, our streets, uh, well, he's keeping banging on the Skripal drum
there. You know, Russia carried out a chemical weapons attack on the streets of the UK. This is the the narrative that that keeps coming from the British government. When was that was that? It's a dubious event, to say the least, and we don't want to get into it, although you've published some great articles and reportage on this. But is there something else about that? Very quickly, Mike, there was a drone attack on Moscow just a couple of days ago.
Massive drone attack hitting civilians in Russia. And who's behind that drone attack? Was it just Zelensky or was it another NATO country that was involved in doing that to sabotage the negotiations? So menacing the streets of Russia? Not military targets, civilian targets. What is Russia supposed to do? Oh, and by the way, one of those attacks was on a pipeline monitoring station that monitors the pipeline flow into Hungary and Slovakia to dissenting
European Union and NATO members. What a coincidence. Isn't that interesting? I don't suppose any chicanery is going on behind the scenes. It's totally above board. Right. In the meantime, Maria Zakharova was tearing strips off the leaders of EU, NATO countries in her press briefing for continuing demand the escalation and bloodshed in Ukraine. We regret to observe, she said, that some political forces in Europe continue to hinder the emerging process. It could lead to resolution in
the future. And so she said the words peace and settlement might seem to upset them because their main goal is evidently to provoke escalation of violence. And I think, Patrick, she's absolutely, well, she is absolutely right. She finished by reiterating the Russian position on NATO boots in the ground, saying that for them, foreign troops, foreign bases or so called peacekeeping missions in Ukraine is unacceptable and that any such thing would end up with them leading a response.
And, you know, they're very clear about that. That is a red line. But you know, we keep pushing up against their red lines constantly and then blaming them for it when we cross them. And there's no definitive statements there about NATO membership or the territory in the Donbass, for instance. So it's a non starter right from 8. From start to finish the whole
thing is a non starter. But you met, you mentioned the the ball is in their court thing, which of course is an example of rapid response mechanism and in action. But what's been going on in Romania? I wish I had shown those tweets on screen. Maybe we can do that next week. But the rapid response mechanism, that's also familiar. I remember that. We'll bring this up on screen right now. So Romania's online content removal policy, empowering or overreaching? Obviously a generous rhetorical
question there. Let's take a look at this. Romania's National Authority for Administration and Regulation and Communications has basically put, we'll bring this back, has basically put a new simulation exercise which is testing a rapid response system of information control aimed at swiftly identifying and removing illegal or quote inauthentic content from social media, particularly in light of the controversy surrounding Romania's recent presidential
elections. They cancelled the presidential election results and they're basically tried to ban the front running candidate, Kaylin Georgia, you hear? And they go on. And this is where it gets interested year. This initiative takes its route from the Rapid Response Mechanism, which ironically was established during the G7 summit in June 2018, meant to enhance cooperation among nations in addressing quote crisis moments and perceived threats to Western democracy.
And who brought it in? That would have been Prime Minister Theresa May. That is correct. Who introduced this? So this is extremely worrying on so many different levels. And we did a little bit more digging into this MIC and this here we go. This is the call for proposals from the European Commission dated October 24th, 2024. This is an advance of the Romanian presidential elections here.
And so this is kind of like a tender for contracts and we have identified the company who has the contract. We'll talk more about that next week. We'll have more information on this. And this goes incredibly deep. This is real time censorship of social media Mic. So in order to defend our democracy, this is being test run in Romania and this could go throughout the EU. And by the way, they did a beta test on this during the recent elections in Germany to test the
concept. So was there real time censorship in the German elections just now? According to this, yes. So. How is that not election interference? Well, we're one thing is for sure, we're going to get out in front of the March 27th roll out of this. We'll be giving you plenty of information before they go live. We'll be going live with what it's all about. So that'll be interesting. Now of course, one way to deal with messages that you don't like is to censor and censor
algorithmically. Another way might be just to kill the journalists. Now, of course, we don't know that what happened to Jimmy White in the United States was a censorship effort, but nonetheless, he was a target. He was he was a target. We'll bring him up on screen. This is Jamie White. He's 36 years old, a reporter for infowars.com. He was murdered earlier this
week. And it's according to his family, this was a a robbery of some sort, an apartment complex after he came home from work at in the parking lot in Austin, TX. I know the area very well myself, so I'm very familiar with this. This town and these types of settings is very disturbing. He's only 36 years old or so, 3637, very nice young men, very popular, you know, very hard working. So you know one of us in terms of independent media journalist.
So it's really disturbing. So we'll bring that back up on screen for a moment here and we'll go here. And so the coverage basically on this it, it has been pretty friendly, I would say the coverage. But the The thing is, he also appeared on one of these Ukrainian hit lists. And there's a number of these Ukrainian hit lists which have been listing a journalist in America or anybody with a dissenting opinion on Ukraine.
Basically, there's the Moravets, the Peacemakers, which a lot of people know about, but there's a few others. And it turns out that the funding of these is quite interesting, being funded by the National Endowment for Democracy, USAID, and. So that would be the organisation that just had its funding reinstated. Yeah, that would be yes, indeed. So this is something Jamie had
tweeted out over the summer. I'm on an Ukrainian enemies list due to my work at Infowars and with Alex Jones on the Ukraine proxy war. I mean, just saying proxy war will get you on that list. And the group who compiled this list is tied to and funded by the US State Department, USAIDCIA and George Soros Open Society Foundation. So, and again, we checked the data on that. And yes, there's Jamie White. He is definitely on this list,
but it's not more of vets. We did a little bit of digging and to my surprise, Mike, I found out that this was another list, which is called texty. OK, This is USAID funded. Elon Musk, as you can see JD Vance at the bottom there.
He's also on this list. It's got 391 individuals and 100 and something odd organisations, many of the media organisations, many names that are familiar to you and I. So we went, did a little bit of a search on here just to Tulsi Gabbard. She's on this list as well. The current director of National intelligence texty.org dot UA as is funded and you can see the heat maps like Kate Starbird.
Do you remember these this sort of stuff when it came out in 2016 with a map individual journalists connect them to political parties. This is this is basically a very nefarious operation. This is the United States deep state who are outsourcing this work to Ukraine using U.S. tax funder money here and there. It is far right website Infowars and its editor Alex Jones and many others.
So it lists all of Alex's journalists on here, including Amy White and others and calls them enemies of Ukraine. Now they they've had to backpedal on this this organisation because they've gotten so much pushback. OK. And Grey Grey Zone just did a story on this recently, but we actually had reported on this back in June, Mike, and we basically said they put Daniel McAdams, Ron Paul and 21st Century Wire on this same list.
And so Daniel wrote a great piece for the Ron Paul Institute on this, which you can find up at 21st Century wire.com. And there they are, Daniel McAdams, Ron Paul. And of course, there's my website, 21st Century Wire. They're listed in there as well as myself and by the way, in very good company with some very good pundits and journalists here. But look at that. This is a doxing operation. And what's interesting about this, Mike, is that there's more than one of these.
This one's funded by USAID, OK, and the National Endowment for Democracy, but it's not the only one. There are more nefarious ones that are connected with this as well. So we'll go and maybe if we have more time, but this one is, is called Mofar, OK, This is particularly nasty, this one, it doxes individuals post their personal details on the dark web, we're told. I have not had access to the level of doxing on this, but
this is one of those. Again, you can see the Times, PBS, Reuters, They're affiliated with mainstream media organisations and we've done a little research on this. Enemies of Ukraine, foreign propagandists, AKA journalists. This is an open source type thing here. So this is, you know, really kind of dangerous in a certain way, Mike, because of the, the, the fact is disclosing people's names, where they live, personal details.
And it's funded by the US government, but it's outsourced to Ukraine. And our, our investigation this has found that that these are a lot of these are functioning as money laundering outlets. These are money laundering outlets. They're using US and Western cash and then feeding this information to Western journalists in the mainstream media or activists who want to harass or target people who are on these blacklists, let's say. So this is just one of those here.
I'm on this one as well as a number of other journalists and people as well. So the Grey Zone did a good expose on this recently, which was done. I forgot which journalist did that. You can see USAID, they're very proud of that affiliation. Even after the whole scandal, they still haven't removed that from their website. So it's just incredible. So you can just see the funding there. It's unbelievable, Mike. So this is basically where
things are at on this. So, you know, it's, it's there's too many of these going and they haven't been taken down. And what what kind of message does this send in terms of the West? Well, it's, it's clearly intended to have a chilling effect on people that are speaking out for sure. And but Malfar, by the way, runs an OS int training programme which is available on some of the online platforms, sort of training skills platforms. It's, it's appallingly bad, I have to say.
But nonetheless, they clearly have people working for them that that are able to troll this data and and and expose it as you say. I think it it reminds me of Bellingcat as well. Similar funding channels, similar kind of attitude, very belligerent and no, no respect for rights and norms and Western, you know, democracies, so to speak. So yes, OK, well, look, let's move on to health matters and welcome Mark to the programme. Mark, let's talk vaccines and and discuss that with James
Rogowski. Thanks gentlemen. g'day to you. G'day to the viewers. Yes, my my guest today is James Raguski. I'll sort of be the sub host right now. A little less than a year ago, James and I both gave some input to the Health and Human Services as they were gathering public comment about the international health Regulations and related matters. That was a little less than a year ago. I've known Jim and about and about his very fine work for at
least two years. But welcome, Jim, I think you've been working at these matters, the the rags and the treaty for the better part of three years or even longer, correct? Correct, and thanks again for having me. Yeah, I've got the clicker. By the way, just a quick comment, but I got 4 slides today and let's go through those. And this one here, this is just
a start. You've got a letter to President Trump dated early March, and a letter to the new Secretary of Health and Human Services, RFK Junior. I'm just pointing out that through your Sub Stack website that people, viewers can, from any country, anywhere in the world really, can read your letters to them and use it as a model or a guidepost for writing their own correspondence. In a couple minutes, we'll show how to contact President Trump
on these matters. Of course you can write to your members of Congress and anyone else, anyone else that you see fit. But Jim, you can outline the website addresses on that, but go ahead and walk us through. I've got a couple slides coming up. I'll show in just a minute of the actual physical effects of MRMRNA injections. 1 is a photo of a Pfizer effect and the other is a Moderna outcome. Both pretty grisly, that's for sure, and they weren't the worst ones.
But go ahead and walk us through your latest about posting and the activism that you're recommending and some of those mRNA, you know, tragic physical outcomes that that happened.
Thank you. Well, the root of this, you know, all actually goes back well before Thanksgiving of last year where I realised that when I was doing searches online and not just using Google, but, you know, alternative, you know, search engines and such, it was becoming harder and harder to find the information that I knew existed out there.
And so I, I went looking around to see if anybody had put together a compendium of, you know, all of the many things that I know and you folks have reported on and you know, many others that these things were just gradually maybe not disappearing from the Internet, but being pushed so far down on any kind of a search result that they were for all intents, you
know, invisible. And so I started asking people, you know, where do you go to get information about, quite frankly, the history of at this point, COVID of, of the jabs and the harms. And, you know, so many things had disappeared off the Internet. They've even disappeared off of archive.org. So I put them all together on one, you know, website where I ran a series of 27 articles and it's all available for everyone at Not safe and not effective.com. I had just gotten, you know, tired.
I'd heard one too many times. Oh, the jabs are safe and effective. Safe and effective. No, they're not. But if you bury the information and one of the key pieces of the information is that with The Who
they have a coding system. You know, the I CD10 codes where one of the codes that probably nobody on the planet is aware of is U 12.9, which is the code that doctors are supposed to use when someone shows up at their office with a vaccine injury or unfortunately, you know, if they're filling out a death certificate, you know, a death due to a vaccine.
And So what I, what I realised was with all of this information, when I dug into some of the gory and gruesome photos that are in the letter to Donald Trump, I, I realise that, you know, yes, I've seen these things. These things don't make it to mainstream media. They don't make it to alternative media. They're gruesome and gory. And these images are not some TikTok video. They're not, you know, somebody's claim. These are case studies that are published in, in well respected journals.
They can all be found on pub Med. It's part of the United States database information, and nobody freaking seems to care. Now, I'm not saying people don't care, but because most people don't even know these things exist. So I figured that for President Trump, I put together some pictures I think he could understand, 40 photographs of the harm that has been caused by the result of Operation Warp Speed.
This is due to his initial action with Operation Warp Speed to ram through essentially a biological weapon to be inflicted upon Americans. Now for the Kennedy letter, it's a bit longer, it's got a lot more detail and it's all information that again is available from Pfizer, from Moderna, from the FDA, from the CDC, from, you know, all of the various, you know, National Institutes of Health and all of the the databases that we have, the various reports.
And when you see that very specifically what I put together for Kennedy was in relationship to children because number one, there never ever was a risk for children. You know, certainly under 12 or, or any teenagers, the risk was inconsequential. So all of the, you know, risk benefit ratio from these injections is 100% risk.
Well, when you have 30 or 40 reports of death of children where none of them were ever going to die from COVID, they are clearly been murdered by the jabs that were rammed through. And here's the real kicker, OK? The real kicker is these are not safe and effective. No one can say that these products are safe and effective because they are not FDA approved. They went through the PREP Act and the emergency use authorization pathway.
They're only legally allowed to say that they may be effective. Well, with the PREP Act and the way that the governance structure is in the United States, it doesn't matter if people in the United States and around the world are wondering why, you know, everything occurred the way it did. It's because the Prep Act, by a declaration made by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, gives everyone
immunity from prosecution. It doesn't matter if you accidentally injected the wrong person with the wrong jab. It doesn't matter if you, you know, inject a child even though they don't have their mother's or father's consent. It doesn't matter if you inject, you know, someone in a rest home who's unaware of of their circumstances. It doesn't matter that all of these harmful, you know, results occur. Everyone has immunity from
prosecution. And and that is the biological warfare under which we've been operating for the last five years. Thank you for that, James. A very thorough explanation and let's go on and show a couple of these results. And this is psoriasis flare up associated with the second dose of Pfizer. Bioentech through Pub Med and NIH is in that web address there. And of course, these links will be posted in the show notes most likely.
But go ahead and comment on that one very briefly, Jim, and I'll show another one in just a moment. I, I believe I included 40 images and you know, some of them are unbelievably gruesome, but there are thousands more. And, and so I, I took a, a smattering of them, you know, essentially thousands upon thousands of people, you know,
have suffered similar impact. But ask yourself, how often do you go to your doctor and your doctor says, Oh my goodness, I'm going to write this up in a journal. You know, this is, this is worthy of a case study. So obviously, you know, these are the worst of the worst, but you know, they're right there in the letter to President Trump because, you know, pictures speak 1000 words whether, you know, it's all, all body inflammation.
Many of the people ended up with necrotic tissue, dead, dying, you know, black, you know, gangrenous tissue. You know, these are not for the squeamish, but it, it also is needed. You know, these are just
swelling on, on a man's torso. You know these are not for the squeamish, but you also need to shock people into an awareness because why in the world would anyone walking around town, you know, unaware, not reading medical journals, not digging, not searching for this stuff ever have any idea? People say, oh, it's safe and effective.
It's safe and effective the, the millions, if not billions of people around the world who have been harmed by not just Pfizer and Moderna, but AstraZeneca and J&J and all the other jabs and not to mention remdesivir and everything else. These people cannot be forgotten.
You know, yes, we're five years on and we're four years on into the jab and, and, you know, now they're talking about hundreds of other jabs, you know, for everything else under the sun as if the, you know, jabs for COVID were safe and effective, which they most certainly were not. And here's one other image. Let's get that other image up there. And this is a bolus drug eruption.
That one there from this one from Moderna, I picked out one Pfizer and one Moderna. That's the side of somebody's hip just above the buttocks and the upper leg there. And just to give one more example, they're quite shocking. And as you say, these are not doctor, these are official. No, no hanky panky with the photos, but you had to dig for
them to show people the reality. And so it's obviously not just death from injection it as bad as that is, but also these these tremendous side effects and outbreaks. But anyway, there's one other slide there with a contact info for Donald Trump and this, this will also be available through
the show notes. But there's Truth Social and other links to get a hold of Donald Trump one more time, James, on that website, that one stop shop that people can go to to read more about this and get involved. What was that again? It's it's very simple. It's not safe and not effective.com. OK, thank you James for a most enlightening and in depth explanation of what's going on. Thanks for having me. Sorry, thank you James. Thank you, Mark.
OK, let's move on then to NHS England and well here he is. Keir Starmer, he was giving this speech yesterday. Let's he's announced the end of NHS England. So let's have a look at how NHS England fits into the NHS bureaucracy. So basically what we have is the Department of Health and Social Care at the top funnelling money into NHS England, who funnels money into local integrated health boards and then into the various service providers.
But basically those service providers might be dentists, GPS and pharmacies, hospitals, district nurses and district nurses and so on. On the other side of the coin, money flows from DHSC into local authorities and then also into slightly different service providers. In this case, you know, social care as well as healthy lifestyle programmes and so on. Now NHS England is a quango. A quango for those who don't know, is a quasi autonomous non
governmental agency. There are more than 300 of these across the United Kingdom. And anyway, we'll come on to why that's significant in a second. But W Streeting then yesterday in the House of Commons said this. We inherited an NHS going through the worst crisis in history, so there's no time to waste. We inherited public finances with a £22 billion black hole so there's no money to waste. Well maybe if they stop wasting it on Ukraine that wouldn't be such a problem.
But anyway, he went on to say today the NHS delivers worse care for patients but more expensive than ever before. The budget for NHS England staff and admin alone has sorts £2 billion. Taxpayers are paying more but getting less. Work has already begun to strip out the duplication between the two organisations and bring many of NHS England's functions into the department. That's the Department of Health, no? In the meantime, that was in the morning, then Keir Starmer was
on his travels. We've seen a little bit of what he had to say already, but let's see what he said on this particular topic. Politicians almost not trusting themselves, outsourcing everything to different bodies because things have happened along the way to a point where you can't get things done. And I accept that all parties have done a bit of this, including the Labor Party, and therefore today's got to be a line in the sand for all of us.
But I also think that in government there was a clear moment when the Tories crossed the Rubicon. It was early and it was decisive and it sent a signal across Whitehall that was never undone. So today I'm going to reverse it because I don't see why decisions about £200 billion of taxpayer money on something as fundamental to our security as the NHS should be taken by an arm's length body, NHS England.
And I can't in all honesty explain to the British people why they should spend their money on two layers of bureaucracy of that money could and should be spent on nurses, doctors, operation, GP appointments. So today I can announce we're going to cut bureaucracy across the state, focus government on the priorities of working people, shift money to the front line. So I'm bringing management of the NHS back into democratic control by abolishing the arm's length body NHS England.
That will put the NHS back at the heart of government where it belongs, freeing it to focus on patients. Less bureaucracy with more money for nurses. NHS refocused on cutting waiting times at your hospital. So if you're listening carefully to that, you'll understand what the point I'm about to make. But so you know, because the question is, what is this all about? Is it about the 8000 unfilled doctors posts and 27,000 nursing
vacancies? Or is it about NHS waiting lists or any waiting lists or ambulance response times? Probably not, because he says he's got to talk. He's got to cut bureaucracy right across the state. Those were his words. I'm going to cut bureaucracy right across the state where we heard this before. It's fascinating to watch as some kinds of policies are rolled out on both sides of the Atlantic at exactly the same
time. First, Starmer announces the building of data centres to run massive AI systems and why? In order, he said, to provide personalised cancer care. And then a week later, Larry Ellison announces that the new Trump regime will launch Operation Stargate to build data centres to run massive AI systems in order to provide
personalised cancer care. And then here we have, and then we have Elon Musk in the United States running his Doge operation that cut bureaucracy right across the federal government. And just a few weeks later, Starmer's announcing exactly the same policy with NHS England as the first to fall. And I've got to ask, is this a coincidence? You know, if it could it be that Starmer has looked at Doge and said, well, that looks popular,
let's do that. Or is it that actually there's something else going on, something else which is happening at a more deeper, at a deeper level of the state, which is deciding that certain policies need to be implemented on both sides of the Atlantic. And my main question is, is this actually about reorienting things more onto a war footing? I think he wants to give the look of Doge Mike, he wants to give the doge vibe, but no real dodging going on. What I think you've nailed it, Mike.
This is also about creating that militarization of healthcare or vaccine roll outs mRNA. You know, boutique customised vaccines like they did with operation and warp speed in here in England and Europe as well. That was a military operation during that period. So that that's that looks like what it is and behind that big corporations.
So what softening up the public for the next part of the conversation later, which is well we think that privatisation might be more efficient in some of these areas. So this is a constant bait and switch exercise with the NHS, with, let's face it, this is the most emotional central issue in the country for everybody because everybody is involved or dependent on it or connected with it in some way, shape or
form. So it becomes a political tool in a way in a political football from administration or government to government. And but the the long range mic trend is privatisation with that's what we've seen over the years. So I is it is that reversing? Has Keir Starmer made a pledge that the NHS will not be or never be privatised? I'm not hearing that part of the
conversation. If you're intending to privatise something, the first thing you do is to strip out all the fat because that makes it more attractive. So. But anyway, we, we'll, we'll keep you posted on this. If you like what the UK column does, you'd like to support us, support.ukcolumn.org is the place to go. There are various options. You can make a donation, join us, a member of the community and that of course gives you access to UK column news extra
that'll follow this programme. Other ways to support us would be pick something up at the UK column shop or from Clive to carl.com. But if you can't do any of that, then please share the material that you find on the various platforms, but particularly from ukcolumn.org. There's lots of content going up on that website on a regular basis. The share links are in the content. Now, of course, we have an event coming up. Let's watch a quick
advertisement for that. Dictator UK column This is an advert. Morals are for vegans. I'm a steak man OK Dumas News flash on 5th of April UK column that debauched band of reprobates hosting a conference for fellow truthers and shakers in Cheltenham called on location speakers will be a rogues gallery of experts that the government still hasn't killed yet on topics ranging from the WEF 8 My Homework to house Loser guy in 10 Stages of Paranoia.
There will also be an exclusive evening event where plebs can't come in where you can knob eating, a call on the cob, gobbing off on how to hobble the UN, using a doorknob shaped key fob to break into the Secretary General's office to rob the COVID files to DOB them all in, leaving them sobbing and mopped. Amusingly enough, given the theme is Deep State thrombosis, the conference will take place next to GCHQ and we're in the midst of a battle of counter surveillance in escalating
measures. Of course there is a gulf in budget between US and them, so the methods have varied. They sent an Agent Provocateur in Argent Provocateur to seduce our top guy, get the deepest darkest secrets of the bizz whilst we sent someone in the pantomime calcosh and write into the lobby to see how far they could get.
They bugged our entire venue with the most cutting edge equipment and have all the details down to the width of the seat screws whilst we said one elderly pigeon flying over their roof and managed to find out the gym the security guard likes tea. That was a coup. So in the end we thought to help with it, let them know, let them know and we're going ahead with it and we'd like you to join us. Be there or be scared. I'm dictator and you're all
idiots. Thank you, Dick. Thank you very much for that. Everybody needs to be there. Patrick will be speaking, of course, Catherine Gunn, Raja Maya and Alex Thompson, Brian Garish speaking. We will all be there to. Have offline discussions as well, so please get there if you possibly can. Now quickly a mention of the interview that went out yesterday, Unmasking Autism with Sinead Murphy is on the website
at the moment. If you didn't see it yesterday, please have a look at it. And a reminder that this, that Sunday, March the 16th, we have Supporting Farmers for Food Security Symposium in Cheltenham and Charles Mallett, Sandy Adams have been taking part in that. So if you can get along to that one, please do. OK, let's move on then. And where do we go now, Trump and Ruta, Because Mark Ruta, the secretary general of NATO, was visiting Washington.
Yeah, he is. This is the successor, the heir apparent to Jans Stoltenberg here. And so the question is, Mike, of course, what is this? Is this, is this anything but NATO appeasement? They like to use that word appeasement a lot these days about Putin's aggression taking territory in Europe and and the sovereign rules based international order. And so here's Reuter with Trump and no protesting against anything that Trump is saying, which is absolutely bombastic.
Watch this this discussion. So but when it comes to Greenland, yes or not joining the USI would leave that outside for me this discussion because I don't want to drag NATO in that, but we're. Going to have to make a deal on that. And Denmark is not able to do that. You know, Denmark's very far away and really has nothing to do. What happens? A boat landed there 200 years ago or something and they say they have rights to it. I don't know if that's true. I'm not.
I don't think it is actually. You know, we have a couple of bases on Greenland already and we have quite a few soldiers. And maybe you'll see more and more soldiers go there. I don't know. What do you think about that, Pete? So don't answer that piece. Don't answer that question, but we have, we have bases that we have quite a few soldiers in Greenland as a state. It would be one of the great states anyway. This would be the most incredible country visually.
If you look at a map, they drew an artificial line right through it between Canada and the US, Just a straight artificial line. Somebody did it a long time ago, many, many decades ago and makes no sense. It's so perfect as a great and cherished state keeping, oh Canada, the national anthem. I, I love it. I think it's great. Keep it. But it'll be for the state, one of our greatest states, maybe our greatest state, but there'll be a little disruption, but it won't be very long.
But they need us. We really don't need them. I and we have to do this. I'm sorry, we have to do this, yes. He said, he says we don't need Canada, they need us to. Why you annexing it if you don't need it? So I mean, it's just totally insane. Like, and, and, and Mark Rutte just stood there in his suit and just basically said nothing, nothing, nothing really substantial. So I mean, it's just kind of ridiculous. Is that because it was basically impossible to respond to?
You can't. Yeah, obviously you can't. You can't object to the king while you're sitting in his court, right? I think King Abdullah from Jordan learned that lesson the hard way. Zelensky tried. He did. He tried. So I, I, I it really makes a mockery of NATO. It makes a mockery of international law, Canadian sovereignty. Canada is a NATO member and so is Denmark. So nothing to say from the NATO secretary general. So he's doing his job. OK.
Well, we're going to have a NATO related aspect to the next item which is all about Bilderberg. Mark bring us up to date. Well, good day gentlemen. Once again, thanks again to James Roguski. Basically. Well, moving along here, I'm doing some clicking on my end. I, I wrote a news brief and the the main part is in yellow.
The chief negotiator for Sweden's accession to NATO, Oscar Strandstrom, who officially took part in the 2023 Bilderberg Conference in Lisbon and at last year's conference in Madrid, reportedly is helping to organise the 2025 summit in Stockholm on behalf of billionaire Marcus Wallenberg. Wallenberg, of course, owns the Majestic Grand Hotel in Stockholm, or the meeting, by all indications, will be held.
It's not ultra official, of course, until the obscure Bilderberg meetings media department announces it. But that's very late in the game of the Guardian did run an article on Christmas Day just this past December, which probably didn't get much play, all but confirming that it'll take place in Stockholm. So that's the going knowledge right now. We'll move forward from there and we're kind of, we're going to cover a little more than just the meeting. The meeting will come, of
course, soon enough. And moving on here, the part in red is another little news brief that I wrote here. The Trump administration has previously claimed it wants to reduce America's military presence on the European continent, and exercises in Sweden are also reportedly expected to be affected by the decision. This matter is all but certain to be a hot official or unofficial Bilderberg topic this year in Stockholm, although NATO is always a general topic and has been for a long time.
Simply NATO, just that one word on the official Bilderberg topics list. And from there we've got we're branching out a little bit. This is this is a picture of of Oscar Strandsum for the Stenstrom. Excuse me, Oscar Stenstrom. Get that right. This is a picture of him with Magdalena Anderson, the PM of Sweden at the time, in Lisbon in 2023. This Swedish NATO negotiator is left off the Bilderberg list, but he gets in anyway. He's an unofficial person who's
been there the last two years. That's fairly commonly known now that the Bilderberg attendees list is by no means complete. Something always to keep in mind. And now again, we'll branch out some more. And this is the Nordic Times, which is doing some pretty good work lately, concerns over Bilderberg executives influence on Trump, and that's, of course, Peter Teal. And the Trump administration has quite a few Teal associates, people that have been involved in Palantir and other companies.
Of course, Teal helped found Palantir. And Palantir is run by Alex Karp, who is a Bilderberg regular now a perennial there, and he's on the steering committee and moving on from there. I noted here that tech mogul and multi billionaire Peter Thiel wields significant influence over President Trump's
administration. And Bloomberg brought out a brand new review on this, saying that at least 15, I counted 16 representatives in the new US administration have clear ties to the Palantir founder, Mr Thiel, who unlike Elon Musk, prefers to keep a low profile. So going on from there, we have the picture of the cover page of the Bloomberg investigation.
Now I inserted the lettering in yellow and green up at the top from the Bilderberg steering committee, currently, not former, but currently Peter Thiel is still on the steering committee. So is Marcus Wallenberg, who's kind of overseeing this year's conference, and Alex Karp, very involved in Ukraine logistics and things like that, high technology in Ukraine, of course, leading Palantir that
Teal Co founded. Now, of these 16 people closely associated with Teal in the Trump administration, I listed what I felt were the 8 top ones. And let's just go through those real quick. I'm calling it the Teal 16. That's my own name, A Clark Minor, former Palantir software engineer, now the chief information officer at the Department of Health and Human Services.
So he's a couple notches below Kennedy, Colin Carroll, formerly of Andro, which is another non traditional defence contractor, kind of like Palantir doing deals with the Pentagon. He's now chief of staff to the deputy deputy secretary of Defence, excuse me again, a pretty high position chief of staff to the deputy defence secretary and a Gregory Barbasia or Barbarcia formerly with Palantir and Elements.
Elements is a reference to volunteer itself, as I understand it. He's now chief information officer at the Office of Management and Budget. Again, a rather high office for these privateers and we'll move on from there. Jacob Helberg, he's now Under Secretary of state for Trump for economic growth, energy in the environment. He's married to a Keith Raboy, an early PayPal executive and former general partner at the Teal initiated Formers Fund. Founders Fund, Excuse me.
He was senior advisor to Palantir CEO Alex Carp and national security and a fellow at the Palantir Foundation. Of course, JD Vance himself vice president of the US. He saw Teal speak at Yale Law School back in law school back in 2011 and later joined Teals Mithrill Capital. Teal became a mentor and bankrolled Vance's Ohio Senate
run with a record $15 million. And in 2021, as word has it, Teal brought Vance to Mar a Largo to patch up his relationship with Trump. And I've got just a couple more, three more. In fact, Barbasia ended up in there twice. So excuse me on that. Let me go down to Jim O'Neill. He's now the deputy secretary of Department of Health and Human Services. He served in roles at education and the Health and Human Services departments. He's been in government before.
He joined Teals Clarion Capital in 2008 and in 2010 he Co founded the Teal Fellowship. And last but not least, a Michael Obeidall, nominated in March to be the Army's number two civilian official. At Andrell, the defence contractor, he worked on next generation command and control projects with the Army and he's a 27 year Army officer. So these are the well connected, that is well teal connected people in the current Trump government.
You guys are talking about the privatisation of government services on both sides of the pond. And this seems to fit that pattern. And I've got a couple things that are sort of a cherry on top. It turns out that Jens Stoltenberg has stepped down from the Co chair of the Bilderberg Steering committee and the builder Bilderberg Group announced that it I didn't happen to get that same email. Usually I get a number of their emails.
That one I did not get. People can check out the source I listed there and the show notes that they want to know more about it. And the last item is almost comical Comic Relief. And we have, we're talking about Canada, while, while Trump is actually sounding serious that he wants to absorb Canada. Well, Canada has got what amounts to a new Bilderberg government. As we know, the Canadian Prime Minister, Mark is now Mark Carney, a long time banker formerly on the Bilderberg
steering committee. He attended Bilderberg in 2018 as the Governor of the Bank of England and in 2022-2023 and 2024 under Brookfield Asset Management under that banner.
And Chrystia Freeland, his so called opponent to be PM, attended Bilderberg the last two years as Canada's Deputy Prime Minister. And it's supposed that she she still holds alongside Carney. So basically the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister of Canada are both in essence Bilderbergers. So that that's an interesting optic, you might say, for Trump wanting to absorb Canada and now Canada's becoming more under open Bilderberg control,
although their Bilderberg affiliations, of course, are not the whole story. But it it's a curious alignment of the stars, that's for sure. But anyway, that's the latest on Bilderberg. I've got a couple of Bilderberg articles posted on the UKUKC website that explained a lot more of their meddlings and connections in AI and in big media. So back to you guys.
Thanks Mark. And we should not forget that if we want to add another name to Peter Thiel network list, that would be Nigel Farage. Oh really? Are they? Absolutely. They are best buddies, Yes, so apparently so. So there we go. Now let's move on then. And what's Tulsi up to? Well, not so much, but this is an incredible story. Bring this up on screen.
So Tulsi Gabbard had already selected a deputy for the Director of National Intelligence, DNI, and his name is Daniel Davis. A lot of people might know him as Colonel Daniel Davis. He has a very successful podcast which is on YouTube. He's also a senior fellow at Defence Priorities. This is a think tank in Washington generally known in that kind of Douglas McGregor vein of a pretty good straight talking, common sense guy, a decorated combat veteran, which is rare in Washington to find
such people in politics, very experienced. And it's kind of been on the right side of most issues over the years. And something happened, Mike, he was basically appointed and all of a sudden the appointment was scuttled a couple of days later. And it turns out it was because he wasn't hawkish enough, we're told, on the issue of guess what? Israel. Yes, Israel. He's not supportive of Israel, not hawkish enough against Iran. So this is what we understood
and there was a campaign run. We'll bring this up on screen here. The ADL was involved in basically smearing Daniel Davis. So the Anti Defamation League involved in defamation, interesting, isn't it? And then you had top Fox hosts like Mark Levin here, he's up on stage basically doing victory laps afterwards after lobbying.
So all these influencers like Laura Loomer and all these like MAGA Zionist, pro Israeli influencers all piled in and went after Daniel Davis and what is clearly a coordinated attack. So this is incredible. So they've managed to basically veto a top pick for intelligence, the Israeli lobby and all these influencers, and they put pressure on Trump and the White House and, you know, work through social media. Unbelievable. So this is incredible. So that's not foreign interference.
That's not foreign meddling in the US government. Of course, that's what Russia does, right? We're told. So anyway, I think it's important that people will bring his is show up on screen here. The best thing we can do at this point is to support Daniel Davis and it's go visit his YouTube channel, Daniel Davis Deep dive. It is absolutely one of the best shows on online like Judge Napolitano, I think even better than than some of these other
programmes, quite frankly. But it's incredible that he nearly got the job and that would have been such a great thing. But what does it show you, Mike? Why would Israel want to keep someone like this out of a job where their cure creating intelligence and we talked about this on this programme in previous weeks. And that's because there is an agenda to wage war and to do a pre emptive strike on Iran. And where's the intelligence coming from for that Israel? It's coming from Israel.
So will will Tulsi Gabbard be compelled to act on what quote, credible threat intelligence about something Iran is supposed to do? And if not, who would be there to check that? Would some could be someone like Colonel, Colonel Daniel Davis to offer a second opinion on that. That's basically what Tulsi probably selected him to do. And sure enough, the Israeli lobby got wind and scoppered the whole thing. So it's it's unbelievable. And it makes me worry that something is coming down the
pipeline. There's an agenda to confront Iran militarily in Washington and in Tel Aviv. And this is a this is a big red flag, Mike. So 2 questions. Any suggestion about who might be put in place as an alternative? And the other is does this say anything about Tulsi's chances for staying in the role? Good.
Two good questions, Mike and I will say that Eldridge Colby who is another person who is up for a national high national security post to be the President's advisor, that's been stalled and the rumour is because he is not pro Israel enough, OK, that's one of them. And then the hostage envoy, Trump's, but who is talking to Hamas? I think he's been sacked. And he's Jewish, by the way.
So he wasn't because he was being too friendly to Hamas and not giving enough deference to Netanyahu, apparently. So he's been kicked out. So who's running US foreign policy? That's pretty clear. Is it Trump or is it somebody else? Is it Miriam Adelson? Is it the Israeli lobby? Is it Benjamin Netanyahu? So if Benjamin Netanyahu is having the final veto on US foreign policy and military affairs, then who's the president of the United States? Really. Very good question.
I suspect it's Elon Musk. Well, let's bring this up on the screen here, Mike. And there's this thing called the conflict of interest. So Musk just pledges to dump $100 million into a a mega super PAC. Trump's not even running. For the for the British audience, you better just mention quickly what a PAC and a super PAC is. Well, Super PAC is because of the legislation. Super PAC is where people can put an unlimited amount in a super PAC and the Super PAC and
donate that to a candidate. Individuals couldn't do that. But if you go through this thing called a super PAC, it makes it all legal, basically. So it's basically buying democracy. Corporations and oligarchs can buy candidates through super PACs. It's all legal in our democracy, right? So, So what does Trump do? He's promoting Tesla here in this video. You can see Elon's got his child there as the human shield against any media criticism.
He's such a good family man. He's got lots of wives, mothers and children. So he's a big Family Guy. But Trump's promoting Tesla here after while getting a bung of $100 million. I mean, does this not look good? Imagine if this was George Soros doing this with Biden or Biden Kamala or something. Yeah. Or Alex Soros's company is getting plugged by Biden, and then Alex Soros drops 100 million into a Biden super PAC.
What would the right be doing? They'd be screaming bloody murder on Fox News. But for some reason, for a lot of people, this is OK. I can't afford to drop 100 mils, so I guess I don't have access. Do you have 100 mil? We, none of us do, so we can't. We don't have access to democracy in the same way that some people do. Is that fair? Is that a meritocracy? What is this exactly? Or is it a plutocracy? This is the question. Very good questions.
We'll talk much more about this and the other things we'd be talking about on the news today in extra in a few minutes. If you're AUK column member, stick around on the live stream and you can watch. If you're not AUK column member, maybe you'd like to join. Do pick up tickets for the April event if you can, but we're going to leave it there for today. I would say thank you very much to Mark and to Patrick and to James Rogowski for joining us today. Have a great weekend and we'll
see you on Monday as usual. Bye bye.