Hello and welcome to another UK column interview and perhaps maybe we will call this interview. You remember the rhyme, Old MacDonald had a farm. Well perhaps Old MacDonald is losing a farm. And for those of you that don't know me, I am a retired state registered nurse and I was also a government advisor at the Department of Health for five years. And I'm hoping as I'm talking to you now, we're ending 2024. And my goodness, what a year it has been.
And I'm hoping that you've all had a happy Christmas and that you were able to spend some time with your loved ones and enjoy some lovely food, because that's a lot about what Christmas is about. Getting together, sharing love, being thankful for what we have on our plates, being thankful for the food that we're eating. But of course, the food is farmed. And whether you eat meat, whether you eat vegetables, it's all farmed.
So no matter what your preferences, this I hope is going to be of interest to farmers, in particular to those farmers that are looking towards the future of British farming. What are farms to be replaced with? Are they going and why are they going? Solar farms, wind farms? Where are the flower farms, the market gardens, the market farmers, the dairy farms, the chicken farms? There's far more at play now.
And this interview I hope is going to help farmers who might not know more of what is going on in the background. And today I'm absolutely delighted. It's a double whammy today. And really I'm just here to facilitate today's interview because this is going to be a conversation because of a chance encounter between two of our very well known guests. Roger Meacock, who is a veterinary surgeon, Natural Healing Solutions, who we've done many of the interviews with.
And also the wonderful Sandy Adams, who I know you're all going to be really pleased to see who has done so much work campaigning and researching and talking about the United Nations Agenda 20-30. But for those of you who are Fresh to UK column, to those of you who are farmers, who know farmers, I'd like to let Roger and Sandy both introduce themselves to you because you might not have met them before.
But thank you both because because of a chance encounter in North Devon, they had a chat and they came up with a revelation and that is what today's interview is all about. So welcome. Firstly, Roger, Roger Mekok, our veterinary surgeon. Thank you for joining us. Roger, do you mind just giving us a very brief introduction into how we got to today? Hi, Debbie. Thank you. Thank you very much.
Yeah, I'm, I'm a veterinary surgeon as as Debbie has said, I've been specialising in natural healing solutions for the last 25 plus years and I've been awake as to what the different agendas going on for some time. And I I started off in my veterinary career as as a farm vet. So hence my interests and love of farming and I also love my food. Those of you who've seen previous interviews will know that I'm actually on the carnival diet myself.
So potentially losing is is upsetting to me, both from a professional point of view and and also from a from a personal point of view. And I had the the pleasure to share a stage with with Sandy at Cloverly in North Devon. We both were asked to speak at the same event. And so yeah, we, we, we bumped into each other there and then had a chat afterwards. And this is the culmination of those that brainstorming that we we had at that point.
And I'm very, very pleased that you met together in Clovelly in North Devon because that brought you together. And Sandy, welcome yet again to UK Column. But for those of those of you that haven't met Sandy before, Sandy, please introduce yourself. I'm Sandy Adams. I, I used to work in the corporate world a long time ago, about 1718 years ago and I, I realised that there was something not quite right and I, I gave it up and I started doing a deep dive really into what is
going on in our world. I was working for companies like Microsoft and Google and and Glaxo Smith Kline. And so I decided to really have a look about what's going on in the world and I, I drew it all right back to the United Nations. Really, it seems to be the crux of it and, and beyond, I mean, the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation and onwards. So I did this big deep dive and found where the control is coming from and how.
And then then to my horror, I realised, you know, the whole Earth Summit and the climate change lie and how it's all been used as a vector for control. And that's really what my work is all about, about how really our world has been captured by these massive organisations who deem themselves to be the rightful rulers of our planet. So that's it. Really, thank you, Sandy. And of course, you know, just recently we've all seen it in the news, the farmers protests.
We've, it's not long been the budget. And there was this huge uproar, of course, from farmers because of the inheritance tax, because I mean, I was shocked at the price of farming equipment, for example, you know, combine harvester, you know, 3/4 of a million. I mean, you know, it's, it's extraordinary the prices. So this, this is a darker agenda, though, isn't it?
And I think when you met in Clovelly, and I'm going to throw it open now to both of you because I know you've got a presentation and I know you that you've got some serious concerns that you want farmers to be aware of. It's not just about one agenda. This is a far bigger issue that affects the veterinary service, that affects the business side of farming, that affects the food chain and it affects the future. So who's going to start off?
Shall we start off with Roger? You went to North Devon, you bumped into Sandy. Take us from there and I'm going to let you 2 take us on into what you've discussed and what you've found in your revelation. Yes. I mean, as you say, there's the, you know, it's, it's a bigger agenda. And obviously everybody talks about farming and we think of the farming side itself, you know, in the fields or with the cows or with the chickens or the
barns. But you know, there is a far bigger industry that surrounds or industries I should say in the plural that surround farming. You know, there are all those that provide equipment for farming. There's those who service the farmers, whether they be vets, whether they be the feed merchants. There's, you know, the farming isn't just what goes on on a farm. And you know, if, if farming is being attacked, then all these other industries are being attacked as well.
And I include within that that niche of farm veterinary work where I started my veterinary career. So, you know, this is something that we all need to be aware of. And, you know, This is why Sandy and I had this conversation and said, you know, really we need to get this message out to farmers particularly. And we know how busy they are and how little time they've had perhaps to dive down the rabbit holes that we've had a look down.
And so we decided that it would be a good idea to put together a presentation and say that the vast majority of the slides are Sandy's. I've added a few in, but Sandy has, you know, one of the reasons we got together and we sort of gelled, if you like, at the meeting was, you know, Sandy was saying stuff that that I knew already. And I think in my talk I was saying stuff that standing you
already as well. So, you know, it was good to get that reinforcement that we've maybe gone down these rabbit holes separately. We've actually come to the same conclusions and we can see what's going on. And actually the conclusions aren't difficult to come to because actually it's written in the documentation. And that's why we've decided to do this presentation to to talk everybody through it and step everybody through it and show what's going on. So let's get going.
Exactly what what you said, I mean, you real 1 realises that a big part of this agenda is to take over the food production and make it a big corporate entity. And, and to get rid of, of traditional farming and traditional farmers and particularly, you know, smaller farms, you know, a medium sized farms.
And, and to make it, make it impossible for farmers to, to pass their farms down to, to their, to their family, umm, to make it a family business that gets passed down through generations, which historically it's always been that way. And what they, what they intend to do is, is to take that facility away from the farmers and, and literally turn them into corporate, corporate entities. And it will it, you know, it's going to initially really impact
on our, our food supplies. I think, you know, they're, they're just trying to cover our land with these renewable, renewable energy facilities like solar farms, wind farms, housing. Housing is a big one. And you look at the, the land use mapping in local, you know, authority land use mapping, you'll find that there's very little provision for food security. And that is the biggest problem at the moment that we're facing is food security. In 2025 and onwards we are going
to really, really be challenged. That's and that's why we're here. That's really helpful. Thank you both so much for that. And I'd probably just add that, you know, the sustainable goals and you've just mentioned food security there, Sandy. And I'm seeing that far from sustainable, we're becoming, we're being made deliberately very unsustainable. The plot to seize your farm. So the idea is this isn't a new idea. It's a technocratic plan that originated nearly 100 years ago.
So the following presentation is a conspiracy but it's not been constructed by us. It was initiated decades ago with the ultimate aim to main control of the growing masses by the few. The slides show the proof taken from government documents and those of undemocratically established global organisations that were set up to achieve their goal for a new world order. Who will dictate global governance in a partnership with non governmental organisations? Which is Mussolini's definition
of fascism. The dominant politicians, financiers and industrialists have been groomed to implement the plan in every country, regardless of which party has been elected within the Union party system. It gives the bogus impression of democracy when none exists in reality. How it all began. It's been a very long term plan, this whole agenda of a of a carbon based economy and it started in the 1930s with the OR just after the depression in America.
And it was led by a political scientists and engineers, a guy called MK Hubbard and Howard Scott from Columbia University. They proposed a replacement of capitalism with an energy based economy as opposed to price based economy. It was reintroduced by the Trilateral Commission, Zubigny Brzezinski in 1973 as the new economic order known as sustainable development and the green economy.
Many illumini of Columbus head up the present agenda like Klaus Schwab, Amitay Etsioni, he's the communitarian guy, George Soros, David Rockefeller. They were an elite group of techcrats trying to implement what was then global warming to create a new carbon based economy. So they already the the seeds of it were actually back in the 1930s. Their whole agenda didn't
actually come to anything. It kind of fell at the beginning of the set at the end of the Second World War because people weren't ready quite to give up capitalism. But what's interesting is is Joshua Haldeman is Elon Musks great grandfather and he was heavily involved in this, in this whole technocratic movement. And they called it Technocracy Inc. It was a a big push to to really get onto this carbon based economy. And he was Elon Musk's great grandfather. He was a maverick, an
entrepreneur. He flew his family all over the world in his plane. And Elon's father LED a very unconventional life in the 1930s through it right the way up to 1947. Haldeman headed up Operation Columbia, named after the university. He supported Howard Scott and Alexander King in the Technocracy movement. Alexander King, by the way, was also a member of the Club of Rome. He had already set up his Social Credit party. So that's that. That tells you a lot about him.
He organised Operation Columbia, funded by the Freemasons of the United States with a convoy of cars to drive from California to Vancouver, stopping at every Masonic temple along the way to preach the new economic economic order of an energy based economy. It failed because as I said, people weren't ready to give up capitalism.
This is just a picture of this very strange grey convoy that went literally from California to Vancouver and they they used to dress in long grey overcoats and, and do not see salutes to each other. It was all a bit strange. The technocracy movement. Anyway, it, it had to be given up. And I'm just going to quote Fritz Springmeyer, who's done a deep dive into Freemasonry. The Kabbalah is a foundational doctrine underlying Freemasonry. And a lot of these are cult organisations.
People don't understand that the capitalism, they believe that they are going to be two, there's going to be two saviours of this world and one of those saviours is going to be technocracy. And we wonder who the other one's going to be anyway. One of them is going to be technocracy, the saviour of the world. And that's a bit bit worrying really.
Now I just want to make make it clear who's behind the United Nations because it is interesting that the Rockefeller brothers were responsible for the building of the UN headquarters in New York. In 1946.
Nelson and David Rockefeller bought the site at East River with an $8.5 million donation from their father JD Rockefeller. The Rockefeller Brothers Foundation also donated $2,000,000 to the original League of Nations to buy the land in Geneva, which is where the the UN building now stands in Geneva and The Who that happened in 1927 where the UN now stands. The Rockefeller Brothers founded the UNI.
Just want to make that clear because not many people realise that that actually it was all built on the foundation of the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation. So that is, you know, that's quite something. I don't think many people understand that. Now I'm going to mention this because this is all very important when you realise the corporatocracy that we're now facing and how it's emerged and why the the public private partnerships that are now being
created is all part of this. This is a a secret in U.S. intelligence report that proves that the Nazis plan to forthright by creating a European economic order by bankrolling industrialists to take control of nation states in Europe in 1944. Top SS officers in the Nazi Party distance themselves from Hitler. The war couldn't be won militarily, so they planned to take over the world in a different way.
At a meeting in the Maison Rouge, Strasbourg, they invited all the top industrialists in Germany. At the time. This included Krups Flick, Dame Lebenz, IBM, Siemens, Volkswagen and IG Farben a lot among more. With the backing of the United States through Operation Paper Clip, these top corporations were told to grow many companies and create a corporate ocracy to take over Europe using the EU as
the means. Before the Common Market EU could be could be formed, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned. The bankers and officials were sort of pardoned in in that in that process and were able to carry on doing business in the US. In 1957, John Mcclay, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for convicted war criminals. This included the above mentioned corporations. This is why we have BlackRock and Vanguard now.
This is like the, IT all started really then when the United States bankrolled all the big industrialists from Germany. So we now see that we're living under that corporatocracy and that kind of links in with the, what's happening now. The, the, you know, the, the big takeover, the corporate takeover of everything literally in our world. The Club of Rome seemed to be be behind a lot of this.
It was formed as a sort of crisis think tank for the United Nations. It's a global think tank and it was founded on the Malthusian principle that the Earth has limited and finite. Resources it was.
Founded in 1968 at the Rockefellers private estate in Bellagio, Italy, by Aurelio Peche, an Italian industrialist for the Rockefeller Foundation and the UN, the main purpose for the counts for the Club of Rome is to formulate a crisis through which the world could be united under A1 world government. Global problems require global solutions, so they just sort of Chuck around ideas about, and it's usually on this kind of
problem reaction solution model. Various Club of Rome reports paved the way for Agenda 21, the intended agenda for the 21st century. This was called the Global Report for the President in the year 2000. They wanted to figure out a way of reducing the population. And I've got a copy of this somewhere. Yeah, there it is. There we are.
And it's a it's quite you know, it's, it's, it's and it was really given to Jimmy Carter and it was really a way of, of, of saying, right, we're going to reduce the, the population of a. It said the US population figure of 100 million emerged again on the CIA linked website called Deagle, that Deagle's a different, different thing. And we'll get on to that later.
But the Global 2000 report was really going into depopulation and and how it could be reduced using population control like this, decreasing population, but also manipulating population by by using other means. And they used the Vietnam War as an example in this book of how they could actually reduce the population. So it's pretty, pretty heavy stuff. This is quite interesting. This is the Deagle report that was published. About 10 years ago, a decade ago, it suddenly appeared on the
Deagle website. It's a true intelligence operation for the United States government run by the CIA in 2014 to 2018. It came down in, Yeah, just just before the pandemic, actually. Their website predicted a massive 50 to 80% global depopulation by 2025. The CIA in the World Bank contributed to these forecasts. These predictions have been taken down in late 2021 with no
explanation. The UK population forecast was to go from roughly 65 million in 2019 to 15,000,000 in 2025, later revised down to 15,000,000 in 2021. These forecasts were for 179 countries with varying degrees of reductions and increases. Now these Deagle forecasts. No one knows how they came up with these figures for the population forecasts of 2025. It's, it would seem that America, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and the UK were, were significantly hit by these lowered population
forecasts. And you know, we, we, we don't know what, what, where, how they came up with these at all, but it's, it's just worrying. It's concerning that these forecasts and the fact that they took them down in around 2021 and with no explanation at all as to why they were up there for a good four or five years, no more than that. But anyway, that's where they were.
Now one of the other major Club of Rome reports was Limits to Growth. Now these, these Club of Rome reports came just before the Earth Summit and they made the bones up of Agenda 21 and Limits to Growth was published in the 1970s. It was 1971 and it was really again, it was about population and how population needs to be controlled. It's a bit like the the Global
2000 report. It was using computer models, flawed computer models about how there wouldn't be enough resources to go around and by 1980 there wouldn't be enough food, there wouldn't be enough anything to go round. So it was basically saying that that we need to do something, we need to use contraception, we need to use ways of of of
decreasing the population. And it was, it was really a bit Malthusian, this whole this whole thing, but deeply flawed because it was at a time in the 1970s where there was a great debate going on about population and that a guy called Paul Ehrlich had written the Population Bomb, a book. And that bomb didn't ever go off again. It was, it was based on flawed computer models.
It was a very, it was, it was a very fashionable thing to be talking about in the 1970s that there were too many of us. And it's, it's interesting now we're not even at replacement level in Europe. So there is there certainly in Europe, there's no, no population problem at all. And we'll go on to the other club of Rome's after this next slide, which I think I think Roger could could talk about.
Yeah, this is Doctor Dennis Meadows, who actually was one of the main authors of the Limits to Growth report that Sandy's just been talking about. And he did an interview that was recorded on video. And this is just a short excerpt from it where he talks about how the population needs to be taken down. At the time he was doing the interview, it it was saying that, you know, we've got 7 million and we need to get down to 1.
And he did this original report, obviously in in 1972 that he revised the book in 2004. And, you know, he certainly hadn't changed his opinions by that time. So you know, this little excerpt is is part of a much longer interview which he did. The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe 2 billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to
have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9 billion probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. That's unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So, but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a but, but we want to have freedom and
we want to have a high sentence. So we're going to have a billion people and we're now at 7:00, so we have to get back down. Back to you, Sandy. This is about Zubini Brzezinski because he was the one, the person who reignited the whole new economic order, the technocracy movement of the 1930s and he wrote a book called Between Two Ages, America's Role in a Technocratic Era. He studied political science at Columbia University with MK Hubbard and Howard Scott.
He was key in forming the New economic order, resource based economy, CO2, carbon taxing. Resources are more valuable than money in the technocratic age. They must be controlled and owned. And that's, that's his, that's, that was his contribution. He was very, very pushing this whole new economic order which actually became big society with David Cameron and and and Tony Blair now in in 1987. Now that the yeah, the, the sorry, the limits to growth and between two ages within the 1970s.
And then we, we, we go forward to 1987 where Grow Harlem Brunland, Prime Minister of Norway at the time, and she worked very, very closely with Maurice Strong from the United Nations. He was the at that time, he was the secretary general and they both wrote this book together.
But although Grow Harlem Brunland takes all the credit for it. And it was the the report on the World Commission on Environmental and Development by Grow Harlem Brunland. And it's often known as the Brunton Report. Now, Prince Charles still uses this and quotes it. It's almost like his Bible. And it's all about really levelling up the wealth of all the nations. Wealth needs to be distributed from wealthy countries to poorer nations as wealthy countries are
destroying the planet. That's that was the idea. India and China, which is interesting. It was, it was, it was this whole shift from wealth to be given over to poorer countries like India and China. It was a commentarian plan to bring equity, not to be confused with equality, to all countries. The West has too was too rich and was polluting and had to become poorer and less polluting
to meet with the Third world. It came under the scrutiny during the Paris climate conference when the disparity of emissions between the West and India and China had become A cause for concern. The Secretary General of the United Nations, Moristrong called it a second Marshall Plan and that's exactly what it was. It was a way of just shifting over the money. And so our industry became destroyed really because everything went to China.
Now after the the our common future, the next Club of Rome report to be published was just before the Earth Summit in 1991. It was this book where the quote, you know, about humanity being the enemy of humanity, man being the enemy of humanity because they literally were looking for a scapegoat. They were this whole club of Rome report was about trying to find scapegoats because at the end of the day, we needed
enemies. The the the Wall had come down, the Berlin Wall had come down, the world wars had finished and there were no enemies. So they had to create one. And they created us as the enemy. So climate change was chosen as a vehicle behind which to unite the people through an existential fear to accept restrictions to freedoms and rights with higher taxes that wouldn't otherwise be accepted. So they, they did identify us in this club, what Rome report as the enemy of the planet
basically. So, and that's why we we are being attacked right now. And then of course, we then had the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, sometimes called the unsaid conference UNCED. And it was the birth of global governance. This is where really it kicked in. This is where they got together. And sort of like this is it we're going to really make a plan to to have global governance. This is a quote from Maurice Strong at the Earth Summit.
He was the secretary general. We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world would be for industrialised civilizations to collapse. Isn't it our responsibility to bring this about? That is what he actually said. Now. That's what we're seeing now is the the, the Western civilization collapsing. And that's, it's all controlled and it's all, it was all meant to collapse. That's what we're seeing now.
Now who was Maurice Strong? Well, he was the grandfather of Agenda 21. He headed up the Earth Summit in Rio. He was an oil billionaire and he worked for the Rockefeller Brothers for 17 years. He was a member of the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the Council for Foreign Relations, a member of the Fabian Society. He was a self concept, he confessed communist in ideology and capitalist in methodology. So that's a true communitarian. That's that's how he thinks.
It's a new communism and it's communitarianism. He was exiled to China to avoid prison in the US for being involved in the oil for Food scandal in 1995, where the UN Security Council made a resolution to supply Iraq with food in exchange for oil. There were revelations of corruption, of funds involving Maurice Strong, Adnan Khashoggi and many other oil billionaires. He loved China and the communist system and he was friends with Chairman Mao. His cousin actually lived with Chairman Mao.
So he ended his days in China and he loved the whole Chinese Communist system, social credit system, everything. So we now realise who was behind the Earth Summit where all this was, this global governance was was brought in. So this is it. This is Agenda 21. It was launched then and it's the agenda for the 21st century. That's why it's called Gender 21. It's also called sustainable development. That's where the term sustainable development came in.
It's written as a 42 chapter document. On the face of it, it talks of sustainability, environmentalism and conservation. But at its heart, it seeks to divide man from nature and control all resources, taking control of land, sea, minerals and just about everything on the planet under the deception of saving the world. Prior to this summit, many of the oil billionaires and bankers had invested in the carbon credit banks.
Obama had set up the Chicago Climate Exchange, so it they'd already invested in this new economy that they'd been trying to get going since the 1930s. And now there, this was their flagship launch of this agenda and it worked. It worked. Now this is interesting. This is some Prince Charles. Now there's a picture there of him with fat Clav Havel from Czechoslovakia and Klaus Schwab. Is that that chap in the back looking very young there.
Prince Charles was in with all that lot and he was, he was he was at the Earth Summit, in fact, before the Earth Summit. This is quite interesting. I'm going to just say this like, just like the Red House report, this is a corporate takeover of the world. In 1990, Prince Charles set up the Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum as a model for public private partnerships. It was called the Public.
The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum became immensely powerful worldwide, bringing together over 50 powerful corporations, partners and members and funders.
In 1991, a year before the Rio Summit, Prince Charles hosted a meeting on Royal Yacht Britannia where where the Summit was going to be held in 92. And he hosted this meeting with members of the UNWEFIMF, World Bank and key executives of Shell and BP, as well as European leaders to push the idea of sustainable development, referencing the UN Brundler report as the road map for the future world's economy.
The following year, in 1992, he hosted the same oligarchs in the Rio de Janeiro harbour to celebrate the successful signing up to Agenda 21 of 178 countries. And that's what happened at the Earth Summit. They managed to get 178 leaders of countries to sign up to Agenda 21, the agenda for the 21st century, to save the planet. And of course who wouldn't want to save the planet? All the leaders signed up to
this. It was to to save the planet and revolutionise the world's economy to that of a carbon based economy controlled by private corporations. There was a whistleblower blower called George Hunt and he said as they chinked their champagne glasses on Royal Yacht Britannia, they applauded themselves saying yes, we did it. We got the whole world to sign up to global governance. So unfortunately that's that's what happened and that's why we're in the state we're in now.
Public private partnerships by via NGOs are undermining politics. That's non governmental organisations and all western governments. So they're undermining politics and all western governments. They are the big business that's destroying representational government in the form of an oligarchy. These extremely powerful multinationals have the ability and are taking over the national governments globally to create
global driven by greed. Corporate structure will undermine everything if we allow it. It's a new form of corporate communism. Also referred to by Klaus Schwab of the WEF as stakeholder capitalism. So they're transitioning us from shareholder capitalism, which is a normal price based economy into into stakeholder capitalism, which is corporate LED capitalism. So it gets rid of small and medium sized businesses, It gets rid of small farms.
And and what they really want is to corporatize it and have these massive super farms and massive super corporation, you know, sort of businesses so that you know that the High Street will will die. You know that the small, small businesses will die. And this is what we're facing now. Just to go back, I always talk about this because it's, it is important. The global diversity assessment of 1995, which I have a copy of here. It's a very, very big book.
And it's, it's got all the, it really is. It's a, it's a, it was published after the Earth Summit, but obviously it's, it's over 1000 pages. It took, it costs $3.3 billion to produce and it is a control and inventory of everything on our planet. So it's almost like an inventory really of everything, every mineral, every, every, every animal, every plant and how they are going to manage it, how the, you know, the how the globalists
are going to manage our planet. And there's nothing in here except on page 993 about human beings. And on page 933 they talk about the the humans that have destroyed the planet. They'll be put into what they call human settlement zones. And these human settlement zones will have corridors in between. And that is that was all part of something called the Wildlands project, which I'll go on to in
a couple of slides time. So it was really a way of of cataloguing everything and how it needs to be managed and controlled. Bill Gates depopulation equation based on CO2 and this is obviously Bill Gates equation. I don't really understand it. I think he obviously it's made up. It's basically CO2 equals people times services per person times energy per service times CO2 per unit. I mean it's an absolute
nonsense. Bill Gates has been buying up huge areas of farmland in the USA and met with Keir Starmer the week before the budget that announced the IHT change. That's the inheritance tax. He has invested heavily in Frankenfoods, yet also in methane reduction in cows. He is a climate alarmist causing this this as leverage to ensure success of his wild ideas and investments EG jimming the sun
with chemtrails. He has invested in The Who, the World Health Organisation to promote his vaccine investments. And there's been has been implicated in a number of scandals surrounding this, including in Kenya, where tetanus and Gardasil vaccines were used to sterilise young girls. I believe some of them died. I mean, it was, he was actually thrown out of India because his, his vaccinations killed so many, so many young people.
Bill Gates is heavily invested in this whole agenda of, of control of the planet, control of the land, taking away farmland. And and it is a huge land grab, corporate land grab of monstrous proportions. Now, this came out of the global diversity assessment I just showed you. This is a map of America, and this was put forward as a project called the Wildlands Project of North America. I used to include these over 10 years ago, 11 and 12 years ago in my slide presentations.
And people used to go, oh, that's a bit of a conspiracy theory that'll never happen. But you know, it's all of the stuff that we've been talking about for so many years is happening. And I began to question myself at one point, but actually it is all it all is rolling out. Unfortunately, I don't, you know, didn't want it that way. This particular slide is, is important because it's a simulated reserve and corridor system protect to protect biodiversity. Most of the map you see there is
yellow and red. Well, those are the areas that humans aren't allowed to be in. And you've got the red areas, a core reserves and corridors, little or no human use. And then the yellow bit of buffer zones, highly regulated use, which means it's for military and federal use. And then you've got these little green dots all over the country and they are normal use. This is where the humans are allowed to be in these little green dots, which are zones, they call them human settlement zones.
And then the, the pink ones are Indian reservations. So it's almost like they're treating everyone like indigenous. You know, they need to be put in reservations. And then you've got the grey ones, which are a few there, which are military reservations. Now this was produced by David Foreman of Earth First. Now we know what Earth First is all about. It's it's all part of just stock oil and Extinction Rebellion. And it was financed by Big Oil. The UN Wildland project was very
controversial at the time. 75% of the US to be given over to self willed land and restocked with wild boar walls, bears and wild vegetation. On page 993 of the US Global Diversity Assessment I mentioned this. The Wildland project plans to remove 50% of the United States population into urban areas or human settlement zones consisting of high rise dwelling units that are to be situated near railway tracks. The railroad will be the main
means of transportation. Private automobiles will not be permitted. The Obama stimulus was a major source of funding for this project. EU plans to rewild 1,000,000 hectares of land, 2.47 million acres and farmers in the UK now paid to rewild their land. So this is where the rewilding has come in. You know that, you know, if farmers aren't putting these renewables on their land or housing, then there are, they're being asked to rewild their land and where is the food?
You know, this is what we have to ask. Where is the food? And they don't want, they want to starve us basically. Now there's a number of these world wilderness conferences that happen all around the world, UN based they call wilderness conferences. They had one in Jaipur in 2020. Actually. It had to go online in the end because of the pandemic, but they plan to rewild 50% of the earth by 2050. Co hosted by China unveiling a global leadership committee.
So they they hold these big, big conferences all over the world. You know that they do it all the time, the UN they hold these conferences and they make decisions on our behalf that we have no idea about. So, and that's just to prove that we there is world wildernesses conferences going on. Wow. I mean, Sandy, there is one heck of a lot of information there and a lot to unpack. And I'm sure people will probably have to go back and watch again because the history.
But now we've got the background, which is really important. So you farmers out there that are watching, don't panic and think this is so much. We just want you to know what the background is, OK? So that if you do want to go and research it, and you do want to go and look at these documents, these huge, great, big thick books. And I'm sure you haven't got time knowing what a farm, what a farmer's life is like to do all
this incredible research. But I just want to come back on a few things because I think in Part 2, where we're going to go is where we are now. So sustainable goals and how we're going to end hunger. Or are we going to end hunger? Are we going to be in the future looking forward to a famine or is it going to be a feast of bugs? Are our animals going to be injected with things that are dangerous to them and to us? So this is all this is all the material that we'll be covering in Part 2.
But I just think for the last few minutes today and thank you so much for that amazing presentation. Let's just have a quick conversation and I'm going to throw it open to to Roger in a minute to make some comments. But my comments initially are that I'm fascinated that you of course mentioned the Rockefellers and perhaps farmers don't know the significance of the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. And believe me, while all this may sound like conspiratorial theories, it isn't.
This is science fact, not science fiction. So everything you're hearing today is real. But when we go back to the Rockefellers, for people in the UK, you might be interested to know actually that the NHS wasn't really founded in 1948 by Nye Bevan. It was actually created by David Rockefeller when he was sent across from America to the London School of Economics and he and William Beveridge cooked up the whole social welfare
reform that we now see the NHS. So that's just a reference to the Rockefellers and I think also your references to the then Prince Charles. Sandy, we've done a lot of work on UK column and for anybody that wants to have a little bit more in depth look at our King Charles, we have a five part series which is growing all the time.
There'll be a part 6 soon of a series called The Green King where we look at the backgrounds of what our King has been doing in his long reign, 50 years on the Royal Yacht Britannia. He's been up to a lot on the Royal Yacht Britannia, an awful
lot. And I just want to say to people that Sandy mentioned there the Earth Summit and this kind of new religion that we're kind of looking at, that seems to be the Earth. That's the new religion, Mother Nature, and of course the Earth charter as well. We now have an earth charter. And the Earth Charter is otherwise known as terracotta, which belongs to King Charles. And King Charles has all the land, right?
So farmers, especially for me down here in Cornwall, the Dutchie, a lot of the farming land is Dutchie land. And our King is very much involved, very much involved. And I think it was absolutely fascinating as well when you brought up the Trilateral Commission, because as we're speaking right now, Sakir Starmer, our Prime Minister, of course, is a member of the Trilateral Commission. So you can see how everything's dovetailing in.
And this is going to make for a very interesting conversation in Part 2. So I do hope you'll join us for Part 2. But Roger, give give us a message from a vet to farmers about all of this that's going on, you know, containing people into into zones and corridors and and land that you can't go on. I mean what is the future for the farmer that you that you go and serve the farmers animals that you go and look after? Yes, Debbie. Yeah, very concerning.
I mean, sort of one of the reasons why we decided to put this presentation together really was to was to give the history of of it all. And, you know, if if we start talking straight away about what the current situation is and and what's intended, it would sound so ridiculous and outlandish that no one would take us seriously.
And, you know, that's been a problem with which I know we've all had individually when we've been trying to speak to people, you've only got a few minutes and you try and give them a few facts and, and they tend not to want to believe you because it sounds so dystopian. And and yet we've seen it all actually in some of the movies and things from Hollywood. You know, how many of those have been based on a dystopian reality that actually when we look back at it, it's actually
starting to come true. And I watched the BBC version of 1984 and it was on telly not so long ago. And I did it as my O level English lit book. And it was just hit me as to how much, how, how when I did it, you know, as a teenager, but O levels, how, how bizarre it sounded, how unrealistic it sounded. And then actually watching the film of it now actually realising how much of they've missed out.
You know, we've got so much more already that that that's already going on. And, you know, farmers and people perhaps coming across some of this material for the first time. You know, we're not expecting you to learn it and understand it and quote it back at all by
any means. But but what we're trying to do is just give you some proof that what we're going to go on and say in Part 2, what we're saying now in this discussion, it isn't based on our fanciful ideas that we've plucked out of some dystopian nightmare that we've dreamt up some night. You know, this, this has come from all these documents which are step by step taken through what the plan is.
And it just happens that we've got to that stage in, in industry and development of, of tech that the facility for using technology for surveillance control is, is now come to a point of reality. And although it may not have been fully implemented here, there certainly has been in other countries. We only have to look at the
Chinese social scoring system. We know that India put in a system during COVID for monitoring their citizens and that was put in by Infosys, which is a company owned by Rishi Sunak's father in law's company. So you know, these, these coincidences, inverted quotes aren't happening by chance. You know, there is a, there is a definite plan in place. There are step by step issues here and all these things are connected.
And so, you know, we do need to wake up because I went to the to the to the demonstration, the first demonstration, but for the farmers about the inheritance tax. And I listened to some of the speakers there. And that was one of the things that really hit me when I was there, that a lot of the farmers were obviously very concerned about their future and what was being planned and said in the
budget, etcetera. But I didn't really get a feeling that there was an understanding or a grasping that there was a much bigger picture. And the idea that the that the inheritance tax has been a miscalculation based on figures that have been, you know, mistakenly picked up from the wrong department of government is, is what they want us to think. You know, this is very much a planned approach. They have absolutely every intention to do what they're trying to do.
And that's why we need to be aware of the bigger picture and to realise that it is all part of a much bigger plan. And although we're approaching this very much from the farming perspective, you know, other small businesses which have been, you know, included within the the last budget as well, you know, any small medium enterprise businesses is now being attacked by, by the similar sorts of measures.
You know that. So this is really what what we're trying to get across is, is, you know, you don't have to learn all the details, I say, but just understand that this isn't being fabricated by us. This is documents which Sandy's obviously got copies of from all her research there. And some of these books can't be got hold of anymore because they're trying to hide and stop people from getting hold of the proof. But they had to distribute it to those they wanted to. So they had to print it
originally. So, you know, this is this is, you know, the message we're trying to get across is this is the definitive plan which is going ahead step by step. And you know, we need to to know what it is so that we can resist it and understand where it's headed and, and realise that that it is much part of a big agenda. So that's that's my perspective on, on what we've where we've got to so far. Thank you so much, Roger, for that. And This is why Part 2 is going
to be incredibly important. And you know, as we've said before, today we've bought you 2 experts with a huge amount of knowledge who have done thousands of hours, work, research, all of all that you've heard today is evidenced.
It's all real. And I just want to, before I go to both of you for your last word, as we always do, I just want to answer a question for Sandy because you put out a question earlier when you were talking about Technocracy Inc and my ears were pricking up and you were talking about there were two saviours of the world and Technocracy Inc was apparently one of them. Well, I can reveal we have
revealed it before on UK column. But the other saviour of the world is King Charles, and there is a statue of King Charles as the saviour of the world. This is real. I'm not making this up. King Charles, he was then. Prince Charles knew about this statue. It was commissioned. He was presented with it. It is now in place in the Brazilian rainforest and some of you may be quite interested to see the picture.
So in the little article that goes beneath this interview, there will be a picture of the saviour of the world. So I think there's a lot more to be said about the King's involvement, the Commonwealth's involvement, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and maybe we'll talk about that moving forward. But in Part 2, it's going to be what's happening now and what's going to be affecting your farm and your future. So please come back for Part 2.
But for now, I'm going to throw first to Rodger, and then we're going to go straight to Sandy for your last word. And our grateful thanks for doing all the research, for putting out the message and also for making the presentation to show people. And if you like what the UK column are doing and you can share the material, please do because the message really does need to get out. So thank you again, both of you. And it's over to you first, Roger, for your last word. Thank you.
Thanks, Debbie. Obviously what we've been presenting today, as I say, we've decided a little bit as a, as a step towards a dystopian future. So, but I don't want anybody to have no nightmares about it. You know, we're aware of it. And I think it is all going to come crashing down. And I don't think they're going to achieve what they want to achieve.
But that will that will happen more more quickly if if more of us are aware of it. So, you know, I wouldn't urge people to share what they're what they're learning and and to do their own research too. You know, we'll, everything that we've managed to research can be found out there.
So, you know, we're not, we're not saying anything that that we've only got access to. So, you know, my view, overall message, you know, sort of leaving really is, is one of hope is, is that, you know, I do think we're already seeing it where we're people are starting to perhaps look to local farms and, and to and to source directly and, and, and understand what's going into, into the food that they're actually putting on their own table.
And so my, my sort of message really is an encouragement to, to farmers who are perhaps feeling a little bit in despair over what's happened with inheritance tax and wondering whether to carry on farming. My, my message to you is, is carry on. You know, we need your food and
you know, we love your food. And so please carry on and find your own ways of, you know, whether you join with local farmers around you, whether you do your own farm shop or whether you find other ways of, of supplying direct, then that would be my, my message would be to urge you to do that as well. And for, for consumers, for all consumers, farmers as well, but it's easy for them to find their own food on their own farm.
But those people who are local to farms, you know, please do look for, for local farmers who are trying to make their food
more available to you directly. You know, it is better profit for them so that they can survive and, and carry on farming the way they want to, not the way they're going to be dictated to. And it's better food for you because it's not being travelled, it's fresher, you know where it's come from and it's all lovely and healthy because, you know, UK farmers are the best farmers in the world. So that's my message of hope
really. And, and those who are in industries that are sort of para farming, for want of a better phrase, you know, those industries around, you know, you need to wake up too and to support your farmers as I know you do in your businesses. But but but to consider, you know, these wider implications because if farming goes, then your businesses are under threat too. And I include the veterinary profession certainly on the farm
side with that too. And, you know, if they go for farm animals and then they'll be going for horses. We've already heard some ridiculous stories about finding avian flu in Mongolian horses that could possibly being transmitted to people. I mean, it's all rubbish. And you know, we need to be aware. Otherwise, if they if they if they're successful in getting rid of farms, they'll they'll be looking to to go for the rest of our animals if we're not careful.
Thank you, Roger. Thank you so much. I think that's a very poignant message, question everything. And now Sandy Adams, thank you so much again for the wonderful presentation for joining us today. And it's over to you for your last word.
Thank you, Sandy. Thank you for the opportunity for this, because if we can reach as many farmers as we can, because farmers, you know, they work hard, They haven't got time to really go into a deep dive as to what is really happening in our world and what's been happening for many, many decades. And hopefully this presentation, you know, and, and, and please, as as Roger said, don't believe
us, Do your own research. I mean, I, I, I, you know, I haven't been, I, I don't get, I don't get paid for doing this. It's something that I feel passionate about that I've been doing on my own part time for the last 17 years and and horrified at the way it's been unfolding. So what we really need is numbers and we need farmers.
We've done the research for you do check it out, but we've done the research for you so that you can have a better understanding that it's not just about inheritance tax. It's about a whole agenda to literally de to deincentivize farmers, which they've seen with the SFI.
We know that the, you know, that they've been told that their, their subsidies are going and that they, they have to create these businesses on their farms that don't involve for food production, particularly meat and dairy. So what, what we're, what we're asking farmers to do is to look at this critically and realise that actually where is the food going to come from? Because there's no provision for it. There's no food security.
And that they need to really think about that before they think about putting solar panels on their farm and selling out to the big corporations and getting the, the money from them. And to really think about perhaps, you know, just understanding that, you know, there's other ways the, the British public will support them, you know, and there's a massive awakening of people looking at what they're eating, as Roger said, looking at the, the stuff that's been put into
our food. And people want pure food. They don't want, they don't want fake meat and, and, and, and stuff that's putting milk to, to, to stop cows from farting or all that horrible stuff. And it's in a way it's doing us a favour. The more, the worse it gets, the more people are waking up. But we do need that, that mass, mass awakening of the farmers to, to really understand that there is another way, There's another way of farming.
And The thing is that if they, if they, if they, if we don't do this, what will happen is the Super farms, which we'll be talking about in the next, the next tranche of, of, of, of slides and presentations is what, what the, what the future of farming entails. And it is so dystopian that nobody in their right mind would want that. So we have to find another way. And we have to do this together with the public. No one else is going to help us.
The government aren't, no one's going to save us. It's us and the farmers. And I believe, as Roger said, that we can do this, we can actually have hope that we can have a future for our rural communities and, and for the, for the people in, in cities that serve, that are served by the rural communities. So I think we, we need to really sort of hunker down and understand where this is coming from, where it's going and just say no, don't consent to all
this nonsense. Because if we do, I know they're going to try and, and push to this avian flu thing, you know, we will end up in the same way that we did with foot and mouth and with and with mad cow disease, with pyres of perfectly healthy animals, you know, being destroyed. And we cannot go down that route anymore because that will be the end of UK farming. So that's all I've really got to say. And thank you so much for this.