The second question that I have for you is, was Jesus a Jew? But my first question actually is why does it matter? Why does it matter? It matters because for 17118 hundred years men have believed that Jesus was just a a Judean or as we say it today a Jew. Even though men didn't look at the word Jew 1800 years ago as we do today. It it's very complex issue. So if we believe Jesus was a Jew, then we believe that Jews were his people.
If we believe the Jews were his people, then we believe that we must treat Jews well because of the promises to Abraham that those who will bless you I will bless. And Christians today believe that the Jews are his people. So if they bless Jews, God will bless them. So they're blessing Jews hoping to get something from God. But in reality, Jews are not his people and they're His enemies. Christ told them. John chapter 10 verse 26. You do not believe me because you are not my sheep.
It's plain and simple that they were not His people. And there's much more evidence in the New Testament that agrees with them. They're not his people. So This is why it matters, because Jews are not his people. But Jews are given free license and preeminence in our Christian society based on the lie that they're his people. What is your background, William? I'm a 10th grade dropout. I'm an apostate Roman Catholic. I was raised Catholic. I dropped out of high school
after 10th grade. I went to work loading trucks, things like that, Got my equivalency diploma, went into law enforcement, spent 12 years in law enforcement, caught a civil rights case, spent 12 years in federal prison, spent my time in federal prison reading scripture and classical
history. And I could spend half an hour explaining the things that I read and studied in those 12 years over the course of which I had translated the New Testament and written many of the historical papers that are available at Christianity Today. So I've done nothing but study since 1996 and I'm still doing that. Yeah, so you're effectively A biblical scholar.
Yes. And that's not the background that people would expect that I have when they speak to me or hear me. But that's my background. I'm totally self educated, but when I tell you I can show you in an old book, that's what's important. So going back to Jesus being a Jew now, I think it's quite important to premise this discussion by saying none of this is about hatred. No, it's not about hatred. It's about truth. It's simply about truth.
It's about truth, but it's also about behavior, because Jews have exploited Christians with this idea that they are God's chosen people. And I don't know if you can see me, but I'm using coat marks with my hands. They're God's chosen people and they they get away with practically anything they want to. Any political agenda that they deem is moral becomes the prevailing political agenda across all peoples. They are controlling the world through the lie that they are
God's chosen people. They have in in their Talmud a concept called tikkun O lamb, which means to re mold the world, to heal the world, to correct the world as if we need correction. It's really an agenda for Jews to mold the world in their own image. They have another agenda with with these Noahide laws, which are a lie, which are a fraud. And they want us all to accept these Noahide laws as the laws of our nations.
And that would effectively ban Christianity the way that Jews interpret Christianity, which is the real end goal. So Jews are truly trying to control the world and and is tons of evidence about this in their own writings. And in a way, you're also speaking about Zionism, and by extension, evangelical Christianity is an even bigger proponent. Yes, the Jews sold them the rope that they'll hang themselves with.
That's exactly what's happened. Evangelical Christians blindly believe that the Jews are God's chosen people, and they blindly believe in those promises to Abraham that they will be blessed if they bless the Jews. So the bottom line is that they are operating out of greed, basically, and they really believe. They really believe that they can convert the Jews somehow, that somehow in the last days Christ will convert the Jews to Christianity.
But that's not what Christ said. Christ said you do not believe me because you're not my sheep. The Catholic Church has taught for centuries that they're not a sheep because they don't believe them. They've inverted the same sayings of Christ in many areas in Scripture. They've inverted it and they teach exactly the opposite of what he said. In order to understand whether or not Jesus was a Jew, well, you have you have to take me
back to the beginning. Yes, at least to the time of Isaiah and Ezekiel, but that'll be brief. And then we'll jump to the 2nd century BC in in Isaiah chapter 34, there's something called the Controversy of Zeon. And for the controversy of Zion, Yahweh, the God of Israel has a cause against a Dumia. Why? Because he knew in his Providence what was going to happen in the future. Let's jump forward now from Isaiah, which is those words were probably written around
7:05 BC perhaps or thereabouts. Let's jump to about 600, maybe 590 BC to Ezekiel the prophet who had written in Ezekiel chapter 3435. I believe it's Ezekiel chapter 35. Probably verses 8 through 10 are around there. He had written that the Edomites, that Esau or Edom would say would, would take these two countries and these two nations for themselves.
And that's a reference to Judah and Israel, most of whom by that time had already gone off into the Assyrian captivity, and only the inhabitants of Jerusalem were left.
And according to those words in Ezekiel, the Edomites were already moving N to take the lands that formerly belonged to Judah and Israel, which had been for the most part left desolate by the Assyrians. And the so by the time that the second temple, that the first temple is destroyed and the Edomites were responsible for the destruction of the first temple, it's in the Psalms and it's in second estrus.
It's in first estrus, which is an apocryphal copy of the Book of Ezra that has more material in it than the Book of Ezra has.
It's probably a better, more original copy of Ezra then what we know from the canonical Ezra. They both placed the destruction of the temple, the first temple, on the shoulders of the Edomites because the Edomites were subject to the Babylonian Empire and therefore provided soldiers to the Babylonians at the siege of Jerusalem. So that being said, by the end of the Persian period into the Hellenistic period, the land of Edumia had actually moved north and Stabo of Cappadocia.
Strabo, the geographer actually described this in a sort of odd way when he said that the Edomites or Edumians were originally Nabatahians who are Arabs in in the southlands in Arabia, and that the Nabataeans drove them out of their original country and they came into Judea. So Strabo, a Greek Pagan geographer who died around 25 AD, understood that the Edomites had relocated from the desert lands to the South into Judea in the first book of Maccabees.
Now the books of Maccabees start about 160 BC when the Judeans were able to free themselves from these rule of the Seleucid Greek kings. Now these Judeans are only the descendants of 40,000 people that when all of Jerusalem was taken captive by the Assyrians around 7 O1 BC, all of Judah and then Jerusalem itself was taken captive by the Babylonians and whoever remained in 585 BC. 70 years later in 520 BC or
thereabouts, only 42,000 Judeans returned. 42,000 people of Judah, with some Benjamin and Levi among them, returned to Jerusalem. That's it. None of the others ever returned. So until the time of Ezra, when a few thousand more returned
with him some years later. So basically less than 45,000 people ever returned to Jerusalem and those people actually became a pretty powerful nation so that by 160 BC they could defeat the Greek Seleucid empire and remain an independent nation for almost 100 years until the coming of the Romans. During that time when Jerusalem was an independent Kingdom, not Judea, but Jerusalem, the kings called the Maccabees. Maccabee means means hammer.
It's really a nickname for the the first high priest of the dynasty. From the time that they gained their independence, Judas Maccabee. So the real family name was Hasemonian. So the Hasemonians began to attempt to burn out all of the Edomites from the cities of Judah, the former cities of Judah and Israel that they had come to occupy, and they'd burn them out. But they didn't have the population necessary to keep those cities.
So they'd burn out the Edomites, and they'd leave the cities empty, and the Edomites would move right back in. The policy was failing. It failed for 30 years until the time of John Herkanis, too. Now when? I'm sorry, John Herkanis 1. John Herkanis, about 1/29 BC, comes to be the high priest in Judea, and that's where the Book of Maccabees ends. And you can see the policy that I had just discussed in the Book of Maccabees, the first book of Maccabees, second Book of Maccabees.
Can I just jump in just for a moment? I hope you don't mind, but when we talk about Judah and Judea,
what is the difference? The difference is that Judah was a Kingdom and the only legitimate inhabitants of the Kingdom of Judah, or citizens if you will, were people of the tribe of Judah, or of the tribe of Levi or the tribe of Benjamin that was joined to the Kingdom of Judah in the days of the divided Kingdom. So the 10 tribes were ruled by Jeroboam. 1 and this is from the time of Solomon.
This is the end of the 10th century BC or the beginning of the 10th century BC. I'm sorry, no, this is about 900 BC that this happened maybe a little later at the death of Solomon, that the Kingdom was divided and it remained that way and Israel went off into paganism. And I could talk about the his that history at great length if you ever want to discuss that with citations.
And Judah became known as the Kingdom of Judah, the land of Judah. And it probably properly should be Judah or Judahite if you refer to an individual all throughout the Old Testament. But Judea was never Judah. Judea was always a mixed race population, which I'm about to explain, and it was never properly Judah.
And the people, some of them were Judah, some of them were the descendants of those 45,000 or so Judah Heights and and Levites and Benjaminites that returned so they could be properly considered Judah. But as I'm about to explain, they didn't stay Judah. So if you're now this is going on today in America, if you're Anglo Irish, a predominant number of people in America, white people are either German
or English or Irish and dissent. And I happen to be German and Irish on my father's side and English on my mother's side. So can I claim to be German? Not really because I'm 3/4 British. Can I claim to be English? Not really because I'm a quarter Irish and and I'm a quarter German so I can't claim to be German, Irish or English. I'm just an Amerimod. But at least I'm all my ancestry is from from those places in Europe.
So the English and the Germans are really a related people and so are the Irish, but just a little more distantly. So I'm not really a mixed race individual so far as I can determine, of course from my genealogy. I'm sorry, a wasp just flew by. Happens all the time here where
I live. But the the truth is that I can't be a German. I couldn't go back to the Rhineland. I know the exact village where my think ancestors came from and say I'm German too, because they're going to look me in you, you, Mick, get out of here. You because I probably look more Irish and I do German. I don't know, right? So so they're going to say, no, you're an American, beat it. You're not German. If I tried to present myself as German to them that are 100%
German, right? It's just not going to work. So what is a Judean determined is determined by the the history which I'm about to present from the time of John Herkanis, about 125 BC. And this is explained in book 13 of Flavius Josephus's Antiquities of the Judeans. His original title is in Greek is Antiquities of the Judeans. I don't like to call it Antiquities of the Jews because that's not true. It's only true up to from a
certain point. So in 125 BC, John Huracanis, who is the high priest for a good deal of time, I don't remember the exact duration, probably about 20 years. So he decided that he was going to convert these people in these cities that formerly belonged to Judah and Israel.
He was going to convert them to Judaism and tell them that if they converted to Judaism that they would no longer be attacked and they would be 1 nation with the people of of Jerusalem and everything would be cool and they'd be able to live in peace together. And basically that's the overtures that were made to them at that time.
And they, they accepted that. And Josephus Flavius Josephus wrote that from that time they were known as none other than Judeans 125 BC. Now most people that can explain, when I'm explaining, they stop there, but they shouldn't stop there because a little later another high priest, a grandson I believe of John Herkanis, I think, came to
the throne. Another has Ammonian high priest, and he was the first high priest of Judea who called himself a king and his name was Alexander Janius and he ruled from about 1:03 BC until about 76 BC.
And Flavius Josephus explains that he went out and converted the the people who were Edomites and Canaanites and others in about 30 different regions of Judea, forcibly converted them into Judaism and made them citizens with the people of Jerusalem. So basically all of Edomite Judea was forcibly converted into Judaism. Is Judaism the correct term? Well, it depends on how you want to see it. It depends on whether or not you're you're considering Judaism to be the Talmud, right?
The Talmud began to be recorded a couple of centuries after Christ, but the process started in in the 2nd century BC, and at that time it was. Sorry. And and it was, was it a, an extension, a corrupted extension of Hebrewism, if, if I'm going to be correct? Yes, because as soon as you can imagine that people of other races can be converted into Hebrew Hebrewism, then you've already violated the laws of God, right? And who who cursed those people? And his law forbids those
people. There are instances where certain people, the kindred Genesis 10 nations, can join themselves to Israel and after three generations they can be considered Israelites as long as they're conforming to all the laws. And they could be intermarried with after three generations. There are circumstances for that in the law, but it's speaking about other kindred people. It's not speaking about the Canaanites and the Edomites who were explicitly eliminated. They were explicitly forbidden
by the law. They were castigated, so it was prohibited to have relations with them explicitly in law. And this is what her Countess did. He went and joined all of these Edomites and other Canaanites or people of unknown origin who were dwelling in the former lands of Israel and Judah. He began that policy of converting them into the Hebrew religion. And at that point I can no longer call it Hebrew ISM. It's no longer the religion of Moses and the prophets.
Now it's it's a corruption. And Judaism is probably the best term we have for it. And Judaism is actually you Daheus is the what a Greek would call Judea you Daheus. And and Judaism and the word Judea as we know it come from those Greek terms. So they don't come from Judah. They come indirectly through those Greek terms. Now Alexander Janius converted over 30 districts in and areas of Judea into Judaism, and he died in 76 BC and I believe at that time it might have been one.
Later John Herkanis too became the high priest. Another man named John Herkanis a little later. So the Romans, the Romans come to conquer the world in, in their process of conquering the world, they come to Judea. Of course, it's going to happen eventually. And the Roman species Judea. And there's a lot of internal political strife among the Judeans. And there was a notable Edomite named Archelaus, I believe. And he had two sons, one named Herod and one named Octopus.
And John Hercanus too, is very friendly to these Edumians. They were Edomites, and he appointed Herod as the governor of Galilee, and occupies his other son as the governor of Jerusalem. And, and I might have those two names inverted, Archelaus and and Antipas, but it really doesn't matter for the point of this conversation. I have all of this in articles at my website, but I'm not sitting here trying to read them on you. So anyway, Herod ended up siding with the Romans and he married
John Herconis's niece. So they were intermarrying with these Edomites. These the people of Judah were intermarrying with the Edumians because they were all the same religion. So it didn't matter. God loves everybody, I guess started back then. So Herod had a a woman of Judah, the niece of the high priest for a for a wife, and he nevertheless turned traitor, sided with the Romans. Judea was defeated, it fell to Roman rule, and Herod was appointed its king.
When he was appointed its king, he wiped out the nobility of Judah. He wiped out the family, the high priest, he killed his own wife. Now I'm condensing about 25 years of history here, right? He killed his own wife, that daughter of the niece of the high priest that he married. He killed her. He killed the sons that he had with her. He wiped out the entire nobility, and he and Edumian became the king of Judea. Judea was the Roman name for the province. That's what they called it.
They called it Judea and it incorporated Galilee and Judah proper and the coasts that belong formally to Israel and to the Philistines in ancient times, and also Edumia. And you could look up Judea on Wikipedia and even Wikipedia admits that Edumia is part of Judea. So at what point did my ancestors stop being German? I, I would probably say when my German grandfather married my Irish grandmother and they weren't really German. My father's not really German because he's half Irish.
So at what point does a Judahite no longer be be a Judahite? Because he's mixed with all these other races and they mixed with the Edumians and they've mixed with a lot of other races since the fall of Jerusalem, which isn't even really pertinent to this conversation. When does a a Judahite stop being a Judahite? How many times has he has to
race mix? Of course there aren't any Jews that are Judah. There aren't any Jews that are Judah. None 0 Not one of them can claim I'm of Judah because he's a bastard. He's mixed in with not only a Dunians, but all of these other races along the way. How could it be a Judah? How could Christians think they're a Judah? They're not so Christ. The ministry of Christ comes.
Christ and all of his apostles are born into this new multicultural Roman province of Judea, where you have Edomites in the South. Just before you continue, William, if you don't mind, at this point you're talking about the various people groups. How, how did they look? Did they all look similar or did they look quite? Different the apostles couldn't tell them apart. John marvelled at Christ for being able to know what what was in a man. He knew what they were he he
could tell them apart. He's God. The apostles couldn't tell them apart. Even Judas, at the night of the Last Supper, Christ told Judas, go do what you have to do, because Christ knows he's going to betray him and bring the high priests and the armies of Jerusalem in on him. He knows it's going to happen. It doesn't happen until they get to the garden of Dissammanae, but Judas is there and he brings these armies with them. Christ knew what he was going to do.
But if you read the Gospel of John, when Christ told that to Judas, the apostles imagined that Judas was going to give money to the poor or to do something good. And John discusses this in his gospel. I think it's might be in chapter 14, chapter 15. I forget chapter 17, maybe. I really don't remember where stuff is in the Bible as well as I remember what's in the Bible.
So I think it's chapter 17 or 18, the scene at the guard, just, well, it's in chapter 14, perhaps the Last Supper scene where the apostles imagined that Judas was going to do good things and instead he went to betray Christ. But the apostles didn't see that coming, right? So that being said, Christ and the apostles were born into this multicultural Judea, which was now a Roman province. And the Romans drew the lines and said this is Judea and everybody that lives in here is a Judean.
And all the people that lived in there, whether they converted to Hebrewism or not, they eventually became associated with all of these other Judeans who were mixed races.
There was still some pure Judahites at the time of Christ, and there were a lot of Edomites in Judea, probably a predominant population of Edomites in Judea at the time of Christ, along with other Ishmaelites, Canaanites, people from other ancient tribes that but themselves by that time were mixed so. Because so, so, so did they look different like the Edomites and the Ishmaelites, etcetera?
That the Edomites and the Ishmaelites all that time would have been virtually indistinguishable from the Judahites in that time. They were still white.
That there were no big infusions of blood from sub-Saharan Africa that had come into the Arab world, but not until the rise of Islam. And that's what a lot of people don't understand is that the ancient Near East and the ancient Middle East were white, predominantly white until the rise of Islam. Egypt and Ethiopia were originally white, but they went darker a lot sooner that they had large influxes of Nubian blood. Probably as soon as these. Well, Ethiopia even sooner.
But Egypt during the reign of the 25th dynasty, the Kushite dynasty. The Kushites were originally white. They were from Mesopotamia. They mixed themselves with the Nubians and invaded Egypt, and they were both Kushite and Nubian soldiers in Egypt under the 25th dynasty. So that brought a lot of black blood into Egypt, probably in the 7th century BC.
And can I just quickly add to what you're saying in terms of how demographics can change, My own country, South Africa, 500 years ago had no white people, and now it has a substantial white population. So it's very easy for this kind of thing to happen, right? Going back to the 1st century Paul of Tarsus in Romans Chapter 9, he's writing that in 57 AD. Yes, I can date it pretty accurately.
He he, he writes in Chapter 9 and in chapter 4 he writes about the promises to Abraham and he explains that the promises to Abraham that his seed would become a multitude of nations was already fulfilled by his time as it is written. In other words, the Catholic Church teaches that people of other nations can become Abraham's seed if they believe in Jesus. But that's not what Paul said.
Paul said in Romans chapter 4 that the promises are fulfilled as it is written, which means that there are no substitutes for Abraham's seed. Abraham himself tried to substitute for a seed by one of his own wider kinsmen, and he was rejected. So as it is written means that the people who are Christians today, true Christians, are
Abraham's physical seed. And Paul was writing to Romans, and I could discuss at great length how that happens in history, but that's definitely a topic for another time. In Romans Chapter 9, Paul said that he prays for his brethren, for his kinsmen according to the flesh, his kinsmen according to the flesh or his brethren, the people of his same race and family are his brethren, that they would accept Christianity.
And basically I'm summarizing. And and then he went on in the same place to discuss the promises, and he said they are not all Israel who are in or of Israel. And he went on to compare Jacob and Esau. Why would Paul compare Jacob and Esau in that context? Praying for his kinsmen according to the flesh. And the answers are found in not only Flavius Josephus, but also in Strabo of Cappadocia. Strabo of Cappadocia was a Greek geographer. And when and and.
He has no axe to grind. Strabo died in 25 AD. He was a Pagan Greek, he was a Stoic. He had nothing to do with Judaism, Christianity. He had no dog in a race. And he explained that Edomites and Judea were all living in Judea, sharing the same customs. But Ptolemy, I have a citation here, but I only have the citation in Greek. I don't know if it exists in any English work. It it's, I don't know if there's an extant translation in English, so I had to translate
it myself. But people that know me, people that know me would understand that I could do that, right? So Ptolemy, Ptolemy, I don't have a degree. I'm sorry. Ptolemy said Edumians and Judeans are different. At first, concerning Herod the king, he said that because Herod, when he became king, took all of his own cronies and appointed them into all the
positions of power. After he wiped out the nobility, he appointed all of his Edomite buddies into all the positions of power and they became the first black nobility. They became the new nobility of Judea, and they were the nobility from that time forward. So Ptolemy recognize the differences here, understood they were historical differences
in these people. In Judea the Christians don't consider, even though these things are mentioned in encyclopedias on Wikipedia. Even Christians don't consider the consequences when it comes to the Jews being God's chosen people. They just accept that blindly as if all all Jews are Judah. It's not true. Dunians and Judeans are different at first concerning Herod the King. Indeed there are Judeans who
from the beginning are natives. Now Ptolemy is writing before the time of Christ. However, Edumians in the beginning are certainly not Judeans, but Phoenicians and Syrians. Now Ptolemy was confused but about the identity of the Edumians, and he tried to describe them in Greek terms from a Greek outsider's perspective, but he recognized that they weren't Judeans. And it goes on to say that he had been.
They had been ruled over by them, meaning by the Judeans, and compelled to be circumcised and to enjoin in the customs, and having been raised in these practices they are called Judeans. That's very similar to what Strabo of Cappadocia had written concerning the Edumians and the Judeans all living in Judea, dwelling and sharing in the same customs. And that's in Strabos geography. In Book 16, there were two passages that say essentially
the same thing. So there's all sorts of historical witnesses to this, but Flavius Josephus gives us all of the historical details. He doesn't discuss the politics behind the scenes as to how those policies evolved. He does say that at the time of John Hakanis that that's where he puts the beginning of the parties of the Pharisees and the Sadducees. That's when political parties arose in Judea at the same time that this was going on. And in my opinion, the word Pharisee means separatist.
That's what it means. That's not an opinion, that's a fact. And in my opinion, they took that name because they were originally the racial purists, the separatists to stay separate from the Edomites. And eventually they only became religious purists, kind of like American politicians do They change, they change their their fundamentals to adapt to the situation. Instead of keeping their principles, they just change them to adapt them to a historical situation.
They they that that is basically negotiating with the world. It's caving in to the, to the what's going on in the world. It's not Christian at all, so Christians should not consider these Jews who are primarily Edomites and Christ spoke in Revelation chapter 2. Chapter 3. These quotes are very common in our circles. Those who say they are Judeans but are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. But William, this is a this is a hard sell because just about every single Bible.
Has the word Jew in it? Yes, and it's wrong. It should never be there. It it is true that Jew is sort of a slang shortening of the word Judean. That's how that worked out in history. But the Jews aren't Judah. Judea was the name of a multicultural Roman province. You can. Jesus was, and Jesus was was the king of the Judeans. Yes, he was the king of the Judeans because that was also the the word used for Judah. But he was he never called himself the Judeans. He never called himself that.
None of his disciples ever called him that. His enemies called him that pilot called him. That pilot was a Roman, based on the claims of his enemies. Obviously. So where does the word Jew come from then, and how? For how long has it been in the
English language? It's been in the English language since the first Bibles. It was i.e. Wes Jews in in. If you open a Geneva Bible or an older Bible than that because there were some English Bibles before the Geneva Bible in 1560, i.e. Wes is Jews UES and it's a contraction for you Daheus, which is what the text says. You die here for Judean or for Judea. You Daheus for Judean, for
Judean man. So you die here was sort of contracted into you ES or Jews. What we say I was Jews back in in in German, AJ, when it appears at the beginning of a word is an I sound or AY if it's followed by a vowel, right? And and that's also the case in English. The J letter didn't appear in printing until the 16th century, I believe, And before that it was always an I. So you daya so. But why did they use the word Jew? Was it sloppy translation work?
Yeah, you know, ever since the 2nd century, the apostles did not teach that the Jews were God's chosen people. They never taught that they only were sent to the people of Judea in general and to to the European world. So that's another long story. But the people of Judea were Israelites and Edomites, and the apostles didn't have the ability to tell them apart. If if an Edomite said I'm a Judean, it was commonly accepted because that was the political
circumstance of the time. And if you can't prove he's not an Edomite, then you just have to accept him as a fellow Judean. So the apostles preach to everybody. But Christ said my sheep hear my voice in John chapter 10. And he told his adversaries who rejected him, You do not believe me, because you're not my sheep. So we have to. If you go through the book of Acts, you'll see in Acts chapter 20 or 21 when James is talking to Paul of Tarsus, it's in Acts chapter 21.
He says look at how many converts there are, meaning Christians. And Speaking of Jerusalem, he explained them as myriads. There were myriads of Christians in Judea in 58 AD, which is when that conversation happened. Myriads are 10 thousands in the plural. So it's 10 thousands and then some that there was a a very large following. There were very many thousands of Christians. The Jews want to obscure this history. They don't want you to know
this. They were in the minority for a great number of years in the Christian period. And the Jews had used the Romans to persecute Christians, and early Christian apologists had written that the Roman persecutions of Christians were all instigated by the Jews. And that's written in Tertullian in his Apology and by Minutius Felix in his Apology. And that's two Christian writers of the late 3rd century, ADI believe. If Jesus was not a Jew, what was he?
Christ was of Judah, but you can't say that he was a Jew because the people that we identify as Jews are from that mixed race polyglot. And OK, right now I'm, I was born in Virginia Beach, OK, I was grew up in Jersey City. I spent most of my life in Jersey City, NJ, the first, most of my first 36 years of life. So maybe I would have associated myself as a New Jerseyan In the 1960s, Jersey City was almost
all white. There was only one small little section of, of Negroes. So when you said I'm from Jersey City, back then most people would assume that you're white. But today Jersey City is like predominantly black and Hispanic, and the whites are a minority. So if I say from Jersey City, you might say, well, what are you? Well, what are you? If you want to know, if you want to know what my background was or or who I was and you didn't see me, you'd say, well, what
are you? I have to say, well, I'm Hispanic or I'm black or I'm Irish or whatever. And the word Jew should not be in the Bible. All throughout the Old Testament, wherever the word Jew appears, it should be Judahite or Judea. And all throughout the New Testament, wherever the word Jew appears, it should be Judean. That's the meaning of the original Greek term, which is simply, at that time, in its proper historical context, A multicultural Roman province.
That's what Judea was. Now, I've got a Bible. It's an interlinear Bible, and a lot of people don't know what that is, but it's effectively a a very direct translation of Hebrew and Greek, and it doesn't have the word Jew in it anyway. In the Old Testament or the New Testament, it uses, as you just said, Judahite, Judean, Edomite even. Right. And and that that's a better Bible. It really is, because it doesn't create a lie that these Jews are God's chosen people.
They're not and and they've mixed with many other people along the way. Jews were in Arabia mixing with Arabs. Jews were in Khazaria mixing with Khazars and and Turks and people of other races. Jews race mixed wherever they went. How many times or over how many centuries can you race mix and get away with identifying yourself at as a as a Judean, as a Judahite, as a child of Abraham when the Bible forbids that race mixing? They're not Judah.
So you mentioned Jacob. You mentioned Jacob and and Esau earlier and in the Bible it says that God loved Jacob and hated Esau. Yes, because God knew Esau was a race mixer, that he would be. He would marry Canaanite woman. So he hated him even while he was in the womb. Now Esau had had sold his birthright to Jacob for a pot of porridge, and that might be true, but that's not why he lost
his inheritance. It says very explicitly in Genesis, and this is in Genesis chapters 2627 and 28, I believe, from the end of 26 to the beginning of chapter 28. And I'm going to check myself on that real quick. Well, not on that screen, I'm sorry. Well, anyway, in Scripture Rebecca explains that her heart is troubled on account of the daughters of hath. I'm sorry, that's at the very end of Genesis chapter 27. And her heart was troubled on account of the daughters of
hath. If Jacob takes a wife of the daughters of hath, such as these which are daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me? She despaired of her own life. If Jacob took wives of the Canaanites, The daughters of hath were Hittites. They were a branch of the Canaanites. If you go back to Genesis chapters 2627, you'll see that Esau took his wives of the Hittites and that troubled his mother Rebecca, who thought that her life was good for nothing if Jacob did the same thing.
So Rebecca and compelled Jacob to steal his brother's blessing when his father, who is old and frail and blind went to bless his sons. Jacob got the blessing because Rebecca wanted Jacob to have the blessing because Esau was a race mixer period. So when that's all said and done, and this is not Genesis 28, I believe it's at the beginning of Genesis chapter 29. No, I'm sorry, it is 28. I don't remember this right. I can't remember where stuff is in the Bible. I just remember the Bible.
So I'm sorry. At the beginning of Genesis chapter 28. And Isaac called Jacob and blessed him and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan, because Esau had done that. Jacob. I was getting this instruction from his father, but his mother was the one that realized it and said, Hey, Jacob can't do this like Esau did his mother. His mother basically saved the
family. Lies Danaram to the House of Bethewell, my mother's father and take a wife from Nets of the daughters of the bond, my mother's brother and they were Lebanon in scriptures called Lebanon the Syrian.
The Syrians were kindred people to the Hebrews, but Lebanon was really only a Syrian by geography because they lived in the far north in Padanaram, which is on the other side of the Euphrates River. It's quite far north in the foothills of the Caucasus Mountains and and not too far from the Black Sea. Padanaram was a plain, it's called Plain of Arum and it was a plain just South of the foothills of the Caucasus Mountains. And, and that's where Abraham was from.
That was where a lot of the Hebrews dwelled that didn't have like a demarcated country of their own, right. Not every tribe gets their own nation, right. You should know that being being South African and and European, that even in Europe not every tribe got its own nation.
They were folded in a lot of them to other bigger tribes, more powerful tribes like the the the Germans are Saxons and Swabby and and several other tribes all allied in Germany and and under one culture and language basically. Well, the language thing's a complicated story, but. But what about all the customs that you read about in the Bible? Circumcision was a way to
preserve the race. Circumcision ensured that when a woman became a man's wife that she knew she was marrying an Israelite and not an Edomite or or somebody of a Canaanite or somebody of another race. The Egyptians were already practicing circumcision even before Moses had it as a law.
So circumcision and circumcision wasn't the circumcision that we have today, and I don't want to get too much into the anatomy of a man's penis, but circumcision, the way the Hebrews had practiced it, only cut the skin from the tip of the foreskin that extends beyond the head of the penis.
You only cut that off. And Josephus wrote that Judeans were able to pull down the foreskin to, to appear as if they were not circumcised because a lot of the Judeans wanted in in the in the 1st century BC, a lot of the Judeans had Hellenized and wanted to appear to be Greeks. And you can see that in the New Testament. There's a lot of figures in the New Testament who have Greek names. Mark the apostle Mark, that's a
Greek name. And Mark was a cousin of of Peter and his original name was Simon, which which was a a Hebrew name and and Simon eventually got into Greece too, actually in the in BC a long time ago. But Simon was originally a Hebrew name, Simeon and and Mark was a Greek name. A lot of the people in the New Testament who are Hebrews had Greek names and were Hellenized to a degree. So, Josephus wrote, the Judean men can draw down their foreskin to appear not to be circumcised.
But what about the other customs that will that you'll often get told about? Well, I mean, the animal sacrifice and just about everything else the Hebrews did were also extant in the wider Mesopotamian and and Greek world. The Greeks sacrificed animals. The Greeks did a lot of those same Pagan practices which had come from Mesopotamia because that's where they came from. The Greeks came from Mesopotamians and from Israelites, depending on which tribe of Greek we're talking
about. So they kept a lot of those same customs. The Romans kept a lot of those customs, the Pagan customs that they're not. Most of those customs are not peculiar to Hebrews. The circumcision custom was peculiar to Hebrews and to ancient Egyptians. That is true. So Herodotus explains, and and this is also found elsewhere, especially in Josephus, that the Tyrians practice circumcision.
The Tyrians were the famous mother city of the Phoenicians that had colonies all throughout the Mediterranean. They were Israelites. That's why they practice circumcision. The Canaanites didn't practice circumcision. Yeah. You know, it's amazing to me that for 300 years Jews persecuted Christianity, and then as soon as the persecutions ended, Christians esteemed the Jews as authorities on Scripture. How could that be?
But they did. Because most Christians couldn't read Hebrew, they turned to the Jews as authorities on Scripture and the meanings of the Hebrew words. And speaking to those Jews, you would believe that the Jews were God's chosen people. The Church has held that view for 17 and in some cases 1800 years. And it's not the view of the original apostles of Christ who understood was a mixed race society. But wasn't Jesus also referred to as Rabbi?
Yeah, but that's an old Hebrew term that means teacher. The Jews, the Edomites, I can't say that they adopted the Hebrew language. In ancient Mesopotamia there was something called the Akkadian Empire in the third Millennium BC. I'm going back to about 2425 hundred BC, and the kings of the Acadian Empire compelled all of their subjects to speak Acadian. So all of the Canaanite tribes who had their own languages, native languages that are now
for the most part lost. There are some remnants of the Hittite language that had been discovered in inscriptions, but for the most part the Canaanite languages are lost to history. The Syrians, which is primarily the tribe of Arum from Scripture and Aram is translated Syria in English Bibles, which is wrong to do, but they've done it the and that's common.
So the the Syrians and the Assyrians and the Hebrews and the Canaanite tribes and the Edomites and even some of the Ishmaelite tribes that were all at one time or another subjects of the Akkadian Empire. Akkadian became the lingua franca of the ancient world, and it remained the lingua franca, meaning the language of trade and diplomacy from perhaps 2500 BC all the way to the end of the Assyrian period and the 8th and 7th centuries BC when Aramaic eclipsed it.
But Aramaic was just another dialect of Acadian. They have a a plethora of common words, common roots common. They have common grammar. So Hebrew is a dialect of Acadian. The original Edomite language was a dialect of Bacadian and and they spoke Aramaic. And that's why from the the Jewish period, Hebrew was fate had phased itself out and the rabbis of the Talmud wrote in Aramaic. They don't write in Hebrew. And isn't ancient Celtic quite similar to ancient Hebrew?
I've never studied ancient Celtic, but a lot of other identity Christians have, and they've drawn a lot of parallels. And I have some of that literature on on my website, books written in the 1800s, several of them comparing Celtic to Hebrew, the ancient Gaelic languages, or the Welsh language to Hebrew. Yes, but this. Why would that then be significant? Why would it be significant is because, as I had said, the Tyrians were circumcised.
They were, they were Israelites. They weren't Canaanites, which is what the Jews want you to believe. Because the Phoenicians had settled not only the the islands of the Mediterranean and the coast of Africa, they settled a great part of the river valleys in modern France. The the Siberian peninsula, Ireland and and Cornwall in Wales and probably points beyond that. We're all established by the Phoenicians.
The ancient Greek writers wrote of the Phoenician tin mines in Cornwall and the islands off the coast of of Britain. So it could be established pretty well in history that the Phoenicians had settlements in all of those places. Once you make that realization you must conclude that the people that are known as proto Celts by anthropologists today were Phoenicians and Israelites. The Kamarians, the the word for Kamarian is Kimaroy in Greek and it was Komri in Assyrian.
And Qomri is the identification, the Assyrian identification of the Israelites they took into captivity. The Kamarians are Israelites and they were the first of the Germanic tribes to cross into Europe and settled in Germany. And they didn't only settle in Germany, they were also went to Britain and and points beyond Germany.
The the Romans were fighting the Camarians in Germany in in the 1st century, 2nd century AD. I'm sorry, maybe the 1st century BC the Romans were fighting the Camarians in in and living and other Roman historians record those battles and they identify them as Camarians. They're the Comrie. Later waves were called Sacca and Skidians of Israelites from the captivities into Europe, but the first wave was called the Kumari or the Kamarians. How is this relevant today?
It's relevant today because most of the white evangelicals who think that Jews are God's chosen people and thereby the enemies of Christ, have political preeminence in the entire world today. You must understand that they are actually God's chosen people and that the enemies of Christ were considered by Christ himself to be devils. And these eat of my Jews who have rejected Christ for 80 generations are never going to be converted to Christ because they're not his sheep as he told them.
He was never intent on converting them. He confronted them and made an example of them, as Paul of Tarsus explains, but he was never intent on converting them. They can't be converted. Does that therefore suggest that Israel today doesn't have a the the Jews don't have a claim to Israel today? No, not on the basis of Scripture, no, they had no claim because Esau shouldn't have been
there in the 1st place. But there is a, a prophecy in Malachi chapter 1, which is really, really interesting and, and I would like to take a moment with that it it's if you don't mind, because this describes what we know is Christian Zionism perfectly. It describes it perfectly. Malachi chapter 1, the burden of the word of Yahweh to Israel by Malachi, I have loved you saith Yahweh. Yet you say, wherein has thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother, saith Yahweh.
Yet I love Jacob, and I hated Esau and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the Dragons of the wilderness. Speaking about the original land of Edom, what's going on there? What's going on there is Yahweh, God telling Israel that he loves Israel, and Israel saying, hey, what about Esau?
Wasn't he Israel's brother? And that's exactly what's going on in the world today, where these unwittingly unknowing Israelites, descendants of the true Israelites, are pointing at these Jews, descendants of Esau, and saying, don't you love them? God loves them. There is chosen people, Malachi. Malachi right there describes that situation and then it goes on. Whereas a Dom says we are impoverished but we will return and build the desolate places,
saith Yahweh of hosts. They shall build but I will throw down. What's that talking about? There were no desolate places ever rebuilt since Malachi's time, except for the desolate places that Christ said to the Jews, His enemies. Your house is left to you desolate. Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, the modern cities of today are the desolate places rebuilt by these Edomite Jews. In Malachi chapter 1, Malachi explains exactly what's going on in the world today in those few
short verses. Do you think that some Christian and Jewish elite know this? I think they do. I think they do Jews right in, in, in their own publications. I'm, I'm, I'm going to, I can't, I don't have this like in my wallet. I can pull it out. In the 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia there's an article and it says a Dom is found in modern jewelry. Well, I would agree with that, but I would also say that my jewelry is basically a Dom mixed with a lot of other races that aren't Israel.
Yeah, there's some Judahite in there. Some Judahites as as I discussed with the family of John Hurricanes too, some Judahites intermingled with the Edomites to become Jews. So they had some Judahite blood among them, but they're they're a majority at that time of these Edomite mongrels. So now today, I can't imagine any of them are pure Judahites. My most rational conclusion is Jesus was not a Jew who for for all those reasons, he was not a Jew because he's not a mixed race Edomite.
He is a true Judean or Judahite. He's a pure member of the tribe of Judah as opposed to these mixed people of the of Roman Judea. His parents, too, obviously. Right, he's not a Jew, and and he's certainly not a Jew at heart. Everything in the Talmud is 100% diametrically opposed to everything in the Torah. The The entire spirit of the Talmud is diabolical. If people would actually go to safaria.org and read it, anybody
could read it for themselves. That the the Talmud is a complete perversion of the law of God that actually inverts it in many ways. Where the Rabbi's are actually justifying sin and some highest sins and using their perceived position as the people of God. They want to use that position in the Talmud to rule over all the nations. Every Jew is going to have hundreds or thousands of goyum slaves and and it's horrible. What is your website, William?
How can I follow your work? Crystalgenia.org. That's Christ, CHRISTOGENEA, crystal Genia. And that word has three different meanings. It means it can mean race of Christ, it can mean birth of Christ or it can mean anointed race. OK, well, on that note, William Pink, thank you. Thank you for joining me in the trenches.