Welcome to the UK column viewers and listeners. Welcome back to No Smoke Without Fire, where Debbie Evans and myself, Brian Gerrish are going to be having a look at the Royal Family, King Charles in particular. This is episode 3 of this particular series and I'm very pleased to say we've had, we've had quite some interest from our viewers and listeners and some very interesting comments. One of the common ones is I never knew that about the Royal family. I never knew that about Charles.
So Debbie, welcome. It seems to me that this edition of No Smoke Without Fire has engaged with our audience. Well, I'm very pleased to see that it's ignited. See what I did there ignited some interest because you know, I've learnt so much through doing this research and I'm continuing to learn and continuing to be surprised. So let's see what people think of, of what we found out this time and that like, like we've always said, Brian, they can make everybody can make up their own minds.
We all we can do is just present the facts and present the evidence as we have it. And then everyone makes up, joins their own dots, and finds their own. Truth. Well, we're allowed to, we're allowed to ask some questions, Debbie. I think questions are always extremely powerful because you ask the right question and people answer it, the audience, people watching, listening in, answer the question in their own
heads. But I'm going to say don't be too shy because you overwhelmingly have been doing the research into this. And we'll say to the audience this morning that just before we went live, we were having a little bit of a giggle because even though some of this subject is very, very heavy, we we know that we have to, we have to keep a little bit of a balance and a sense of humour. So we're having a bit of a joke for the camera started rolling.
But we also thought it'd be a good idea perhaps to kick off with a bit of video, because people are keen on video. And it does get a lot of information across very quickly. What caught your eye, Debbie, in the video sense? Well, quite a lot caught my eye. It's been a very busy time, hasn't it, for the Royals, a lot of people asking a lot of
questions. You know, as we're recording this, there's been the the controversy over the Princess of Wales's photograph that she released for Mother's Day. The King has a diagnosis of cancer, so he's not making public appearances, so other members of the Royal family are stepping in for him. But he has put out a Commonwealth message and there was a quite an interesting reaction from some of the public with regards to the Commonwealth
message. But I I feel, you know, when you get one of those gut feelings and you see bits of evidence and you think our things are starting to fall into place. And I'm hearing the words Commonwealth a lot. And I think we're going to be hearing about more about the
Commonwealth in the future. But I see Commonwealth countries as perhaps being what I would describe as a soft target, if you like, for the agenda or certainly for what the King has planned for the planet seems to be centred around the Commonwealth, probably because that's very easily accessible to him. So it was just very interesting listening to the Commonwealth speech yesterday. Debbie the Commonwealth of course also represents a very large number of people on the globe.
I can't remember off the top of my head how many people we're talking about live within the Commonwealth. But it's not only a soft target, I agree with that. But you're also dealing with a huge number of people that come under the sphere of influence of of of the UK and of course very much the Royal Family because invariably they are, they are still the royalty for many of the countries within the the
Commonwealth itself. And the other bit that just comes into my mind, sorry, sorry to push push in straight away with this, but I didn't want to forget about it was that many years ago Mike Robinson and I were looking at some documents out of the Parliament in Scotland and what we discovered was a was a very strange document.
It was a very simple it was, but it was really a document from within the Scottish Parliament which was expressing support for the Commonwealth. And we were a little bit surprised about this because the sense was that the growing SNP at that time was maybe hostile to things South of the border.
But here was this document which seemed to be amazingly friendly to the Commonwealth. But then with it we found another document and it was basically saying which is the best route to it didn't talk about global governance. There was another expression used. But if I if I say global governance, just to pin it down, that's my words, not in the document, it said. What is the best route for achieving this world framework? Is it the European Union or is it the Commonwealth?
And I I wished that we had taken a copy of that document on that particular day because the next time it came into our heads was months later. And of course, when we went looking for it, it had gone. So I know that's just me, Brian, telling the audience what I saw. So it's anecdotal really, but I assure the audience I'm telling the truth.
And we were just fascinated to see unknown people north of the border looking at the Commonwealth as a possible stepping stone for something much bigger. So, Debbie, make of that what you like. Well, I think you you struck on something else there now, but don't quote me, but I've got a feeling somewhere in the back of my brain. I think it's a third of the world's population is based are based in Commonwealth countries.
So you're absolutely right. It's a huge amount of people to control or to have power over and a lot of land. And I think we're going to see, when you say there's a choice, you know, Europe or the Commonwealth, I think as we go on, we'll see that the Commonwealth is probably where we're heading. Yeah, absolutely. OK, so back on the subject of videos. We've got a video to do with the Commonwealth. Yes, well, only actually we're recording this a day after.
It was recorded by the king himself, who of course we know he's got cancer diagnosis, so he couldn't be present to in the celebrations. But he's put out a speech and I think we've got a recording of it. The 75th anniversary of the Commonwealth is a moment to reflect on the remarkable journey that our unique family of free and independent nations has made since 1949. Last year, the Bahamas celebrated its 50th anniversary of independence, as Grenada has this year and Papua New Guinea
will next year. Each of these milestones, and many others like them, represent the fulfilment of countless aspirations and the achievement of such remarkable potential. And the Commonwealth growth, with new members continuing to join our family of nations, demonstrates clearly that whilst we may not all have a shared history, we have common ambitions for a better future, working together to build resilience and respond to global challenges.
The Commonwealth families strongest when we are connected through friendship. As I've said before, the Commonwealth is like the wiring of a house and its people. Our energy and our ideas are the current that runs through those wires. Together and individually we are strengthened by sharing perspectives and experiences and by offering and borrowing the myriad ways we have each tackled the challenges of our time. This is true both at the level of nations and indeed at the local level.
We recognize today that our diversity is our greatest strength. The Commonwealth represents 1/3 of humanity from all regions of the world, with all the different experiences, knowledge, and aspirations that this brings. Wherever we live, we are united by the many challenges we face, whether it be climate change, the loss of nature, or the social and economic changes that
new technologies are bringing. Our diversity means that these challenges affect us all differently and that we experience their impacts in different ways. Their seriousness, however, is common to each one of us. All of this means that we must work together to understand each other's perspectives, including the inequalities and injustices which still resonate to this day. We must find ways of healing and to support each other to pursue
solutions. I cannot say often enough that it is by coming together that we create the best chances to improve our world and the lives of people everywhere. Indeed, over the years, countless people across the Commonwealth have been inspired to form their own Commonwealth associations, from lawyers and accountants to business and trade networks, and many more besides.
The work they do is absolutely vital, sharing professional knowledge, experience and expertise across the continents for the betterment of each one of us. The Commonwealth above all retains a particular focus on our young people who make up 2/3 of the entire Commonwealth population. Whether in Kenya or Malaysia, Vanuatu or Dominica, Malta or Canada, I never cease to be impressed by their creativity, innovative skills and hard work, often in the most challenging circumstances.
Their energy is transforming approaches to development, technology and preserving and restoring nature, and will, I hope, help to shape and safeguard our common future. Having recently celebrated my own 75th birthday, it warms my heart to reflect on the way the Commonwealth has been a constant throughout my own life, a precious source of strength,
inspiration and pride. In recent weeks I have been most deeply touched by your wonderfully kind and thoughtful good wishes for my health and in return can only continue to serve you to the best of my ability throughout the Commonwealth. My belief in our shared endeavours and in the potential of our people remains as sure and strong as it has ever been. I have no doubt that we will continue to support one another across the Commonwealth as together we continue this vital journey.
Well, Debbie, I have not heard that for that clip in full before and I found it absolutely fascinating. We had a little bit of discussion before the start of today's No Smoke Without Fire as to how long we'd let that clip run for, but I actually feel that watching the full 5 minutes clip is very, very informative. So he's heading for our common future. I just wonder who our really. Is. Well, it's, as he said, it's a third of humanity and it's 2/3 of that third are the young
people. So he's targeting young people. And you know, you look back and you think of the Duke of Edinburgh's Award targeting young people, the Prince's Trust targeting young people. And you start to see, well, you know, was this a good hearted gesture that came from all the right places with the right intentions or was there another underlying reason? Has this always been targeting young people? Because I don't know if you I
didn't count. But the number of times he said common in in that piece, in that speech, whether it was Commonwealth or common ambitions or a common love for the planet, he kept using the word common. But clearly this is a Commonwealth Association where he's promoting young people, lawyers, accountants. Yes, that's. A It seems like this huge, great big consortium business. You know, this is the Commonwealth is a is a big industry, it's a business. Yeah, I I I found that.
I picked up on that as well. I thought it thought it very strange that the first profession he mentions as really doing something to help humanity. Lawyers and no general disrespect to people who are in the legal profession, but it's it's a pretty long shout, isn't it, To say that this is the profession that's going to be helping to save humanity. And then what else is his
message? For the young people it's about fear, because he's talking about the seriousness of the situation facing the planet with climate change and the attack on the environment itself. So he's he's very subtly putting out of a message of fear to 2/3 of the of the Commonwealth population, which is itself 1/3 of the global population. That's some powerhouse, isn't it? Yeah, he's putting pressure, a hell of a lot of pressure on young people, you know? He said that it was all about
preserving and restoring nature. And this is for them to do. This is their job. This is what he's telling them to do. And then to use analogies, I found quite extraordinary the fact that the Commonwealth family was like wiring a house and where the current that runs through the wires within the house, you know, this is, he's using analogy there as well. But this is not a stupid man.
You know, a lot of people have said about Charles as Prince Charles, you know, he's a bit eccentric and I'm not doubting that he is. He talks to plants and I don't doubt that he does. But he's switched on. He's very astute. He's very well read and he's he's a businessman and he's had a mission for many, many years and he's been accomplishing it, I think, very well.
So I don't think that Prince Charles, now King Charles is the eccentric, kind of not so highly intelligent man that we've been led to believe. I think he's very switched on and I think he knows exactly what he's doing. Yes, he isn't Tim. Nice but dim I think was the the description. No, he's something very
different. But I'm also going to say it seems to me that he's very switched on within his own frame of reference because there's certainly things that he just does not want to engage in. So within his his framework view of the world, he's he's very switched on. But he doesn't appear to be able to see the reality for a lot of people. You know, even in this country, people who are suffering, people who got problems, problems with the churches, none of that he seems to see he.
Doesn't care. Yes, He doesn't care. He he just, he it's people say you know he's nobility. He's the king. He's not in tune with the people. Well, that's because he doesn't have to be. He doesn't particularly want to be either. So, you know, when you look at it in the in the cold light of day, you think, well, I mean, I don't know, Brian, but casting my mind back to all of those years that the Queen was on the throne, I never saw the British public en masse objecting or protesting.
You heard about the odd, you know, the odd protest every now and then, but you didn't hear about a lot of rumblings of discontent about the monarchy like we do now. And as you know, as he was giving that speech yesterday, there were protests going on and people chanting not my king. And there was drums and all sorts of protests going on that we didn't get to hear about on the mainstream media, of course.
Should we have a look at that because this is UK column and we we should show the audience there. So let's see some of this protest, because I think there's there's quite a lot of points to discuss about it. So it's a protest video. Sometimes you can hear what people are saying, sometimes you can't because the volume isn't there or it's all a bit muffled. But let's show it raw, as it were, and then we can have a chat about it for the audience. With the 1000 lbs, what it could cost to you?
Almost £300 million a year? Thousand million pounds. Find out why we don't enjoy it so much. Have a lovely afternoon. But we're here to get rid of the monarchy because it is wrong in principle. It is a corrupt institution. And because it is bad for our democracy, which is why we are standing here saying he is not acting and instead of a coronation we need an election. Instead of child, we need a
choice. That's why we're going to be here and we're going to be at every place that which King Charles goes to, asking him questions, to buy any answers, asking him to take part in debate, answer his critics. And we're going to be asking him why he dodges inheritance tax, why he dodges income tax, why he's so secretive, why he throws his son under the bus but protects his brother. We're going to be asking why he thinks he should be our head of state without a single vote cast.
We're supposed to be a democracy. We should not have a king in 2023. We should have an election for our head of state. We're not arguing for the US system. We're arguing for a parliamentary Republic. I would argue for every man we're in charge of this country, treated as equals in law. I will argue for all of us. We have the right to vote, to vote for our head of state and to be our head of state if we so choose them. Well, there we are. So a couple of questions I'll
throw at you. I don't expect necessarily an answer, but whenever I see people well organised in a protest with the T-shirts and the uniform banners, I always wonder who they are. So I don't know who the group in yellow is, but I'm, I'm very interested in them.
And I also noticed in that protest there was a lot of drumming, and drumming was very much a feature when Extinction Rebellion was turning up, not only to protest as Extinction Rebellion, but they were particularly good at turning up in order to undermine other legitimate protests that were taking place, particularly in London. What? What's your take on the On the Guys in Yellow? I think, I think you make a very good point. We don't know who they are.
We definitely don't know who they are and their underlying motive and their intention, I don't know the answer to that either. But what I do know is listening to people on the street, what I hear from people on the street, from young people especially, who don't seem terribly engaged with monarchy, full stop. Actually, they, they really don't seem to care or take much notice.
So I don't see that the youngsters are being engaged, perhaps with William and and and and the younger members of the Royal. Maybe they'll encourage more young members of the population. I don't know. But I I hear my generation, our generation, Brian saying not my king, he's not my king. You know, I I've, I've, I can't say that I've always been a monarchist, that the more royal family have always been there and my mother was very much a monarchist. So I went to see the state
opening a parliament and stuff. But now would I, would I have ever gone to something and said not my queen? No, probably not. It's not until now that he's taken the throne and all of a sudden he really isn't my king. So I feel that they're reflecting. I think a lot of what of of what the public are feeling. But I'm not sure who they are. Does that make sense? Sorry, I've. Rambled a little bit.
It it absolutely makes sense and and personally I excuse me, I feel this a lot of people could be very critical about Queen Elizabeth but if you say OK come up with the evidence showing well they might come up and say well she's immensely wealthy and that that's that's one certainty but she had a calm dignity and she did seem to have an an ability to to actually get on with people. Charles is completely different. And yeah, he's come, he's come onto the throne and this furor
has started. But just to be fair to the team in in yellow, of course they're saying he's not our king and we didn't vote for him. And I think I'm right in saying that if we go back in English history, it was actually the case that that the people I'll qualify, that people we're getting into, people with some standing in society, did at least get a say who was going to become king or queen. They actually made a decision as to whether a person was suitable
to be on the throne. But Charles was was anointed and put on the throne without any real dialogue with the public. And that's the bit that I feel particularly uncomfortable about. So maybe maybe their suggestion in that demonstration that people should have a say who becomes their king and queen. Perhaps there's some real merit in that. Well, I don't think if nothing else, anybody from outside the UK watching this now should know that King Charles is not loved by all of his citizens.
Far from it. There are many people in the United Kingdom who are saying he's not my king. And I find when I look around the Commonwealth, if you like, there's more love and more respect I see for the royal family outside of the UK and and I think that's it. That's an interesting dynamic because I I think people from overseas, they think that we're all, you know, staunch royalists, whereas actually that's not completely the
picture. And as you say that Debbie, what comes into my head was the interview I did with a lady called Sam from Uganda and in talking about things to do with the family courts and child stealing by the state. But she was talking about living in her own country and the image of UK that was portrayed in in Uganda.
And of course one of the things we know is that the BBC in particular, which of course has got this audience, this huge global audience, is remarkably good at selling the message that everything is lovely in UK and what a wonderful royal family we
have. So I wonder whether some of that feeling and loyalty, even love for the royal family that you you see people in the Commonwealth expressing is a result of the propaganda that's been published, pushed into their own countries via the BBC and other royalty aligned media outlets. Yeah, I'm sure, I'm absolutely
sure. Because when we start to see what King Charles has been up to behind the scenes and what he's created for the Commonwealth, I'm hoping that people's perspectives change and people start to ask some very serious questions. Because this doesn't just affect the United Kingdom, you know, potentially the globe. But for sure, everybody that's living in a Commonwealth country should take notice of what King Charles is doing.
Yeah. Well, and on that wonderful comment, I think that's time perhaps to get back into the narrative that you were delivering in the previous episode of No Smoke. And of course, you were showing all of the things that King Charles and Prince Charles as he was what the king was involved in. And the key topic that we really broke on at the end of the last episode was Terra Carter and the Sustainable Markets Initiative for people who are still thinking, Oh well, he's just
that nice man who's the king? Let's get back in into having a look at what he's into. The sustainable initiatives, we've all heard of the Sustainable Goals. So the sustainable initiatives is this website that King Charles has got, but it's otherwise known as Terracotta. So this was established at the World Economic Forum by Charles in 2020 and it was talking about a one planet, it's it's, it's been discussed before through the One Planet summit.
You can see actually in the next slide what the then Prince of Wales said about his new Terra Carter. There's the quote there from him. The Terra Carter offices offers the basis of a recovery plan that puts nature, people and planet at the heart of global value creation, one that will harness the precious,
irreplaceable power of nature. Combined with the transformative innovation and resources of the private sector, He is talking about global value creation and he's talking about the private sector. This is about stripping even more wealth out of the globe. This is not about people. He doesn't even put people first. Nature comes first. Money. It's all about money. See. There we go again. This is the common theme. He's a businessman. This is a business.
This Terra Carter is the trademark. And of course if you think about Magna Carta, where the people came first, he's just, he's just kind of wiped that off off the face of the planet. Literally. And now he's installed Terra Carta and something else which we'll come to in a minute, another Carter. But Terra Carta is, is the road map if you like. Well, it is it's it's it's the road map to what's coming down
the line. And it's he says that this is going to promote an inclusive, equitable, prosperous and sustainable future for the sake of present and future generations. Well, I would say his the generations of the nobility, the generations of the globalist. But not us, I don't think. Terry Carter will serve as the guiding mandate for this is the Prince of Wales because it was written a while ago. Sustainable Markets Initiative.
This is about markets. The Terracotta aims to provide an integrated road map towards an inspiring, inclusive, equitable, prosperous and sustainable future for the sake of present and future generations, supporting the protection and restoration of a minimum of 30% biodiversity on land and below water by 2030 and 50% by 2050, encouraging coordination, cooperation and cohesion within corporate and public private philanthropic domains.
And then it ends by saying that Terra Carter is to be a living document that will be reported on an updated annually. This will allow the Terra Carter to keep up with global progress, technology evolution, and a shifting investment landscape, while seizing rapidly emerging opportunities developing around the world. This whole language, Debbie, you're absolutely right. This is corporate language markets, developing markets, developing opportunities.
This is about taking more money out of the earth wherever it's possible. Public, private, philanthropic partnership, money, money, money all back down to money. But you know, what I thought was interesting was where it said supporting the protection. I mean, let this sink in because it's quite extraordinary supporting the protection and restoration of a minimum of 30% of biodiversity on London below water by 2030. Now that's a 30% of biodiversity by 20-30. That's the Commonwealth, right?
That's pretty much that. That's the same sort of land mass as the Commonwealth. But that's not good enough. He wants to return the Earth to that's half the planet by 2050. I mean that's enormous, enormous. And then you've got these seals that go with Terra Carta and you can see the green one, which is Terra Carta. So that's the sustainable initiatives. And let's not forget, you know, we've got big players in in in
terracotta. We've got people like Unilever, AstraZeneca, BP, we've got Bank America, Heathrow, Heathrow Airports, Ernst Young, they're all involved in Terracotta. And then you've got Astra Carta. So you've got the crown on one side with butterflies and bees king of the world and people of the people on the planet, harmony and nature. And then on the right hand side you've got Astrakarta, where it says to care for the infinite wonders of the universe and it's
his crown. So is he saying there that he's king of the the Earth and king of the universe? Well, if you ask me that question, my response is yes, he does. This is what I pick up from his his his whole initiative and his demeanour and what comes out of his mouth. Yes, he actually does believe that he's king, King of the earth. And and to also believe he's king of space is is just incredible. I mean, I'll throw this in deliberately. Is he saying he's king of
heaven? Well, well, I guess yes. You know, I I can't see any other way. This is the question though, isn't it for everybody to answer. It's going to be everybody's own
personal opinion. It's a difficult one, but yeah, I would say so. And this this seal, that green Seal that you saw that's really important in the big scheme of things because if you get awarded one of those then it's like receiving I guess the Willy Wonka Golden ticket through to the Brave new World and you can see there that that's just another company, well that's the SAP awarded Terracotta seal for
commitments for sustainability. So if your company is, is a green company and eco friendly and agrees to of the net zero, the climate agenda etcetera, you get the green seal and if you get the green seal or the black seal then you know you're doing very well for yourself. Thank you for the future.
You're pretty much got a guaranteed successful company and we've got companies, I mean sustainable, the sustainable initiative, restoring the planet to nature and yet AstraZeneca, you know you've got companies like AstraZeneca that are supporting this. So this is, this is big business and it even spans to America big time. And I was surprised to see that this press release came out from the the White House last year, July the 10th, 2023.
And President Biden, he was hosted by King Charles at Windsor. And a lot goes on at Windsor because we were talking in in the first episode of Green King about Windsor and Windsor House and the laity and a lot goes on at Windsor. But President Biden went off to meet with the King and 23 philanthropists and financiers to discuss this whole net zero climate change with Charles. Over recent months, I am watching more and more video clips, of course, of President Biden.
Who is stuttering and stumbling his way through public's speeches and and election gatherings And it's quite clear that the man is absolutely past it and is not capable of making any coherent, common sense decision. And then my mind says, OK, well, if that's the case, why is Biden still in power? Well, he's still in power because having a nearly dribbling, incompetent president means that the real power base is hidden by him.
It's the power base under him. So when you talk about July the 10th last year, 2023, when President Biden and the team of philanthropists were meeting up with Charles, Biden wasn't putting anything into the meeting. He was just there as the as the rather dozy figurehead, the powerhouse was the advisors that came with him or the corporations that came in with him.
And and the last point I'll make is that at no stage of this development of Terra Carter or the Space Odyssey as I'm going to call it, did Charles talk to the people in UK. He didn't call a meeting with his subjects and say, look, this is what I think is important. This is what I intend to do. He he, he went straight away to these all powerful corporations,
global companies. And then once he's developed the formula, he's dictating to his own subjects and he's actually dictating to the poor people in the Commonwealth because they're being deceived into believing that this is a wonderful man that's got their best interests at heart. Yeah, absolutely. And for sure he absolutely hasn't. I mean, at the at Windsor, Grant Shapps went along, John Kerry went along as well.
And the whole idea with all of these philanthropists and these financiers, the whole idea was basically to kick it up a gear, to put your foot back down on the accelerator, literally to accelerate terracotta. And that's exactly what they were planning and that's exactly what you've got in front of you now. And a lot of people, many people have heard of Terracotta, but not many have heard of the Terracotta Accelerator Fund, which is is the document that's on screen now. Right.
So that's that's 100 million. But at the bottom it says the members of the Sustainable Markets Initiatives Financial Services Task Force have committed over 8.9 trillion dollars, $8.9 trillion to support the transition to net 0 by 2030 or sooner. Well, of course that deadline's failed. That's the good news. But these people magicked up 8.9 trillion. Meanwhile, in the Commonwealth, let's let's play Charlie's game.
In the Commonwealth we've got people with no fresh water who can't feed themselves, but we haven't got any money for them. This, this, I'm going to say it. This man to me is a complete fraud. I can accept that he believes what he believes, but for him to claim that he's got the best interests of people in UK and the Commonwealth at heart, this is this is a fraudulent claim. It's a rich fraud though, isn't it? I mean, I take it back to money
again. Yeah, OK. It's gone back to money and and in order to to put the foot down on the accelerator with Terra Carter, he's had to make some adaptations. So he's employed a company called Pollination Global Climate and Nature Investment Advisory Firm. So they're going to be the general partner of the funds because they've got this funding goal of $125 million. And then they've also had to appoint, appoint a global law firm. You can see there whites and Kay.
So this is where the acceleration accelerates even more. And I just started to look into pollination and you can see there, Brian, that it's a specialist climate change investment and advisory firm. Right and and and it says. It says our people are the key to unlocking change. I wondered whether White and Case the law firm that he mentions is why Charles in his speech that we opened this No smoke without fire episode.
We showed the clip of him talking and the first people he mentioned as helping this whole change and improvement and transition of the world were lawyers. So do you think maybe he had that firm whitened case in his head? So that was a little plug to the good job that his his legal friends had done. Yeah, for sure. And we'll come on to, we'll come on to them in a minute, but before we get on to them.
And I think it's relevant too to what you've just said is that Pollination, which is a specialist climate change investment advisory firm as we've just said, look down at the bottom there and you'll see that we're talking governments, businesses, public, private capital. So again, we're looking at this fusion of public private partnership with philanthropists. But I just wanted to see, I mean we will get, I, I promise you we will come to the lawyers, but these are the kind of people
that are running pollination. You've got Tony O'Sullivan and Martin Wilder and I mean you know they've they've got some pretty, pretty strong CVS there. You know they've been around the block a little bit and you can see plenty of names that will pop out to you like the Australian Renewable Energy Agency arena. We've talked about them before. This is all net zero. But then you've got the Serpentine gallery mentioned there.
You've got these are people with a lot of money and a lot of power, and they're going to be controlling literally trillions of people. This Terracotta accelerator that's going to be led by those two individuals is is is a very powerful organization. I mean, you might want to read the quote out at the top that King Charles wrote about Terra Carter there again. OK, so Terra Carter offers the basis of a recovery plan that puts nature, people and planet at the heart of global value creation.
One that will harness the precious irreplaceable power of nature combined with the transformative innovation and resources of the private sector. So that comment he was, he was pushing out. But I'll just reinforce your comment on the two men involved with pollination because Tony, what was the gentleman's name, Let me just call it up O'Sullivan. That's right. If you have a look at his CV, merchant banker and and involved
with hedge funds. So you know if we look at the world, I mean very recently I I did an interview with Justin Walker where we were talking about the Bradbury Pound. This is AI encourage people to go and listen to to that audio discussion. But what we were highlighting is, is how money is created and who creates the money. And what we essentially show very easily is the present system of of of money creation and the control of the monetary
system is a fraudulent system. Charles leaps straight into bed. Now we obviously not saying that either of these gentlemen are doing anything wrong, but what we are saying is that there is a financial system in the world. Charles has jumped straight into bed with it, as if it's all bona fide and has the best interests
of the public at heart. I mean, for the whole of my life, which is getting longer, as it were, I I haven't woken up in the morning thinking to myself, thank goodness for those international bankers that are really, you know, helped me on my journey through life. Or thank goodness for those hedge funds which are which are supporting the local Hospice. Or thank goodness for the bankers who are really helping our medical system to survive. I'm not thinking that at all.
What I'm actually thinking is these are the people who are milking every area of human existence. There's nothing that there's nothing that we produce or have or grow that these people don't come in and take their financial cut from. And Charles leaps straight into bed with them of. Course money, you know, and the two, the, the, the two gentlemen that we've just highlighted, Tony O'Sullivan and Martin Wild, you know, there's a big
Australian theme going on there. So again, we've got a Commonwealth creeping in. We're going to see Canada in a bit, creeping in. You can see where the Commonwealth is. None of it is for us. Let's just be clear about that. This isn't being done for our best interests at all at all. Yeah, we'll pause there. Yeah, because it it is breathtaking.
And I mean, you know, we're only on part three we've we've still got a long way to go. But I mean, let's just get into the Terra Carter accelerator a bit, because nobody is really talking about the accelerator, You know, Accelerator is a powerful word, and this really is speeding things up big time. Yeah. So it calls itself an accelerator program. It's building capacity, capability and capacity across early stage nature projects and companies nature. It's not to do with people.
We've got a Terracotta accelerator fund investing globally and this is nature based projects and nature tech companies to deliver commercial returns. So you're spot on. This is about money and making more money and the accelerator initiative is a response to His Majesty King Charles, the third challenge to the sustainable markets initiative to develop 5 land based and five water based initiatives per year through to 2030.
It's got 125 million in the pot and then it talks about pollination and then it says the aim is for the accelerator program to be launched in 2024. And they're going to be looking at proposals of people. And if anybody thinks that their local parish council is going to make a proposal to these boys, they best think again. Because these are going to be proposals that come in through the global corporations and there'll be proposals where those corporations see they can
make most money. Sorry, getting a bit motivated here, Debbie, but we're really into this. We're really into this subject now. Well, I I think you're going to be even more into it when you see who said what on the next slide. Well, of course it's it's Mike Robinson's old friend Mark Carnage, as he likes to call him Mark Carney, as was governor of the Bank of England. But he comes in by saying that the scale and urgency of the climate challenge is clear.
We need a step change. We must act. And then he's saying that four out of five of the top G20 companies now report on climate, reported business risks and opportunities. And these are powerful boys because they got combined balance sheet values of 120 trillion. Then he's on to COP 25 with 630 institutional investors managing 37 trillion in assets. Momentum is building. We must bring together the right combination of ideas, skills and relationship to drive systemic
change and capital flows. Pollination does that. So there you are. We're talking about huge sums of money in order to create even more money and this is all going to be accelerated. And remember that Mark Carney as Mike in particular, excuse me, reported several times on UK column The Bank of the Governor of the Bank of England, as he was simply said that if companies do not adopt the green agenda, they will be punished, they will be forced out of
business. So this isn't even something which these boys are going to bring in with a carrot to the world population as something to help them know. This is about screwing every every cent, every dime out of the out of the global system to make more profit. And if you don't want to play, they're going to put you out of
business and you can starve. It's funny you say that though, because if you go back to the previous slide, you'll see that actually what you've just said is at Mark Connie's actually said it, Brian. It's the headline and investors, yes. I'm sorry, I didn't like that in. Plain sight, right in front of your eyes. I'll let you read it out, because it's exactly what you've just said. Well, that's because I was scanning the small print as it were there. Yeah, so, So I completely went
by the headline. If some companies, investors fail to adjust to this new world, they will fail to exist. Think about what this, this, this man is saying. You don't play our game, we're going to wipe you out. And of course, for some people, if you wipe their businesses out, you wipe their lives out, you wipe their ability to feed
themselves. So I'm I'm going to say when I look at these documentation, these documents, the language is often very measured and it sounds reasonable, but the instinct of the people putting this stuff together are killers. Yeah, absolutely right. But you know, I'm not going to disappoint you, Brian, because I know you're waiting for the lawyers. You never have, Debbie, I don't think. I don't think you've ever disappointed the UK column with research that you've been doing.
Well, I do. I do love to Deep Dive. I think people are starting to call me Deep Dive, Debbie. Now, I know a couple of our doctor friends are anyway, but there's there's the, there's the legal firm. So there's White and Case, the King's legal firm who's going to oversee the accelerator, Terra Carter Accelerator. Yeah, well, I don't need to say much about the international law
firm. A long history as a global firm and IT and they say they're uniquely placed to help our clients resolve their most complex legal challenges wherever they are now. They're not talking about people in the local town who've got a dispute between them. These these are people talking about working alongside vast global global corporations to help those corporations win whatever legal battle they need to win in order to make even more profit. That's what they're to do with,
in my opinion. Well. We know we know the kings interested in lawyers. We know the kings interested in bankers. We know the kings interested in charities. We know the kings interested in faith. Because money in all of those. I mean, you imagine we've just mentioned a few little strands. You imagine the huge pot of money if you Add all of those up together.
But let's just look at another area, sustainable insurance, because I never knew that existed, but it clearly does a United Nations Environment programme, Brian. Yes, a strategic approach where all activities in the insurance value chain, including interactions with stakeholders, are done in a responsible and forward-looking way.
By identifying, assessing, managing and monitoring risks and opportunities associated with the environmental, social and governance issues, sustainable insurance aims to reduce risk, develop innovative solutions, improve business performance, and contribute to environmental, social and economic sustainability. And then I say, well, no, it doesn't. Insurance is about making money
out of fear. People are fearful that their house is going to burn down and they're prepared to pay a lot of money per year in order to mitigate the risk should that happen. So this is insurance companies working alongside big firms. It's not to do with them looking after little people. Oh no. Perish the thought looking after us little people. You know, just to reinforce really, the insurance is a big business when it comes to sustainable goals and
sustainable development. And you can see there that you've got Net Zero Insurance Alliance, the sustainable insurance facility of the vulnerable 20 group of finance ministers, the V20A Task Force on Nature Related Financial Disclosures. But it doesn't take long, does it, before it all comes back full circle to the king. So the King's got his sausage fingers in the insurance pie as well. Yes, It's incredible, isn't it? Top insurers join Prince Charles to fight the climate crisis.
Yeah, I'd love to know how. What are they actually doing? Because we don't believe in the climate crisis anyway, but what do they think they're doing? And it goes on. It talks about there was a few mentioned there, legal and general Alliance, Hiscox and AXA. And they've all pledged support. And they say that the Prince, what the Prince is doing, is helping us convene and galvanise
a whole of industry response. So this is where everything is drawn into a big network and the moment you see private partner, private public partnership initiatives, the moment you're talking about this sort of thing, what it's actually doing is dumbing down governance that's accountable IT. It disappears into a BLOB. You're not sure whether you're dealing with profit making corporations or you're dealing with a think tank or you're dealing with the government.
It's all in a sort of squidgy mass and and and the agendas driven through that opaque BLOB, this is, this has been going on for years but now this is on a global scale where they're calmly saying, well, we've got the odd 9 trillion to make this happen, $9 trillion. Well, you know, you think about you've got money, you've got insurance. What else do you need? Oh, weather.
You need to have weather. You've got to have floods, you've got to have disasters because that's where you get the insurance coming into it. But then you can see there, we've moved on now from Terracotta Accelerator to Terracotta Exchange. And when you see what's in the Terracotta Exchange and you can see Lloyds and BP and and the
sponsors at the top there. But when you go and look up what the insurance market is like that King Charles has got his, his fingers into, look, I mean I've only taken a tiny selection. These are just, these are just a few. But if you go on to the Terracotta exchange website, the amount of insurance companies and insurance insurers like Direct Line, massive companies, they're all involved. They're literally it.
As you said, it's a web, Brian, but it's only when you start to get to look into these documents that you can see how big they are. But I mean the electrical vehicle, the electric vehicle services, you know, we're going into electric cars, We know what happens with electric cars and sadly a lot of them have been setting alight and they've been on fire. So you've got the electric vehicle services, we've got carbon offset insurance, you've
got hydrogen insurance. I mean, hydrogen's meant to be the next big thing coming down the line. Green endorsements. And like I say, these are just four. These are just four that I've taken. So there's another funding stream for the King insurance. Yeah. And the insurance can also be used as a weapon because of course for a lot of companies, a lot of businesses, a lot of professions, if you can't get the insurance, you can't actually trade, you can't function.
So, and we, we, we know this in the legal world that if they want to get at a barrister or get at a a solicitor or a law firm, what happens is their insurance is withdrawn and then they can't practice. So insurers very, very powerful. And another example I can give of that is the horrible case many years ago when there there'd been some pretty vile child abuse in children's homes in North Wales.
And when this came to light, it also emerged that the insurers of that local authority were telling elected members of the council what they could not, what they could or could not say in public. Because if they said the wrong things, they could damage the council's defence and that means they would have to pay out more money. And that money, that risk of payout, was covered by the insurance companies. So ultimately the insurance companies, this did appear in public reports.
The insurance company concerned was was working in the background to close down the exposure of the abuse of the children because they were helping protect the risk of the council in future compensation payouts. So if anybody thinks, well yeah, they're only insurance companies, no, these are very powerful and very dangerous companies because they withdraw their cover. You can shut down whole sections of industry and the public
sector. But if not just that too, if you think about, you know the, the direction of travel that we're going at the moment, everything's becoming digital. So if you're not compliant and you're you haven't got access to your app, to your phone, or to whatever you need to get insurance, you're not going to get, you're not even going to be able to access insurance, let alone get insurance.
And if you're not compliant or you haven't been doing what you, the government, are telling you to do, you won't even be offered insurance. And let's face it, a lot of people in this in the world, but especially we're talking about the UK here. I've got mortgages where they need buildings, insurance, you need car insurance. So you're right it this is a very, very powerful sector and it could affect every single one of us. But what really concerns me, I think more than anything, is
when all of this goes digital. Because then some of us are going to be locked out of all of the systems entirely, Yeah. Well, let's have a look at at England, because allegedly King Charles is supposed to have, you know, England within his Kingdom. He's supposed to be concerned for us, but what's he doing with Cop 28 and Nature? This whole Natural England thing, I mean, you know, we haven't even started on his connections with farming, with
his younger life. When he he was visiting, he was going off very quietly and he was learning about crofting in Scotland. He was going all over the place actually to learn about organic farming, which is why you can see what's going on with high growth and organic farming. But Natural England, I think we've covered Natural England many times. Tony Juniper there, the chair of Natural England, will come on to him in a minute.
But Natural England have been responsible for snatching farmland from tenant farmers that have been there for generations, and they've snatched land back and grabbed it. Land grabs back in order to rewild. And Tony Juniper has been at the heart of this, literally. And Tony Juniper is one of King Charles's closest allies, Closest friends in fact.
They've Co written a number of books together, one of which is a book called Harmony, of which I've got a copy and I've read it and you'll see that he, he calls it actually a new way of looking at our world and it's it's Co written by the the King as he was then the Prince of Wales, Tony Juniper and Ian Skelly. And I would say to be honest that this is the blueprint for what we're seeing now, this whole worshipping nature, the
environment, sustainability. He also talks in the book about Transition Towns, which is the, I guess just before the 15 minutes city concept was really launched. But Transition Towns and how many places down here in the Southwest actually have been involved in that? Totnes, Falmouth, many places down here in Cornwall. So a very revealing book. And for anybody that hasn't read Harmony, like I say, it's very revealing, but he's a prolific
author. You know, King Charles has just written another climate change book with the very same gentleman, Tony Juniper, again, So Climate Change with Ladybird, I believe this one's coming out so. Yeah. I'll just add that we're not plugging, we're not plugging Amazon, not showing the book. That's just one of the one of the places. But I I've got a suspicion does does King Charles do everything he does and write all these books?
I I think what happens is he has a, well, it's not even a ghost writer. He has a partner that does most of it and then he puts the royal pen stroke in all the key expressions, or he edits the draft. That's how I think it works, because I don't think he sat there with original stuff coming out of his own head. No. Although although he is very learned and there's a lot of, there's a lot of what's it called, Sacred geometry in the book, a lot of it. And he's very knowledgeable on it.
He's studied a lot. So whilst I would say yes, he's got other people to write and and contribute to the book, I think, I think a lot of it is actually penned by him. It's said that he works until midnight every night, He gets up very early in the morning, he doesn't stop for lunch, He's pretty much a workaholic and he's obsessed, literally driven. He's, he's written a lot of books.
He's read a lot of books. And he says that, you know, he he likes nothing more than to sit in one of his beautifully manicured gardens, often manicured by Miriam Rothschild. But that's for another no smoke. And he reads. So he is very well read and he is very learned and he's an intelligent man. He's a businessman and he's got a lot of money at his hands at his disposal. OK. I I think Debbie we could manage another 10 minutes. I've said that.
I'll see whether there's a shout from from Stephanie that we can't do that. But I I think we do another 10 minutes and that's that's probably a good episode that we've done today. I know you're itching because you you've got so much stuff to share with the audience. But I I think it is good to be able to work through it and have some discussion about it and you know to put some context into some of these things as as opposed to just getting, you know, raw images through the screen.
So I I think the the discussion is necessary and you always add some some really good points. So let's let's squeeze in 10 minutes and see where that takes us. But we are saying to the audience, there's tons more to come about. This man and what he's really up to, I mean. Look. There's. There's let's give them a little taster, Brian. I mean, we we, we haven't really
looked at the investiture. We haven't looked at the farming that he's been doing so much of. There's there's his personal life, his friends, his associates. You know, these are all the things that I've been looking into. So there's there's a lot more to come, a lot more to come. But I noticed. No, let's let's go back to his book because A King, a climate change book for kids and Cambridge 0.
So there you've got the University of Cambridge supporting His Majesty talking about the World Economic Forum as well there. And it it says His Majesty has been an environmental leader for over 50 years. This reiterates your point that if people think this man was just some sort of eccentric sat in the background pontificating on the beauty of architecture or the right architecture, no, this man has been up to this game for up for this game for a very long time. Yeah, absolutely.
And he's not done it alone, you know. And we're we're just touched. Shall we just touch? Members of. His family, Yeah. We'll just touch your members of family because he hasn't done it alone. And you have to think to yourself, well, who do you trust in your family, you know, that can bring in the money that's got a good, maybe a good sociable personality that likes to go out and about. I mean, he's got the perfect brother, hasn't he?
Or did have in Prince Andrew who was known as you know very sociable very gregarious bit of a the sales Rep I I call him the sales Rep of of the royal family and you know what was he doing as UK trade envoy that's going to be kept secret by the British government until 2065. We don't know. We don't know what Prince Andrew has been doing, but we do know
that there has been. But there's certainly a biographer that wants to write a book about Prince Andrew, and he submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Foreign Office, but got told that all the documents pertaining to Andrew's role as trade envoy were going to be kept secret until 2065. That's 100 and five years after Andrew's birth. So this is breaking with
tradition completely. So we're never going to know what Prince Andrew was doing or where he was getting the money from or where the money was going. We'll never know. But of course what we do know now is that Prince Andrew had a lot of dealings with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and there was a lot of money there too. So you have to ask yourself what, what kind of money was going to the royal family? And then when it did go to the royal family, where was it
going? Was Andrew collecting on behalf of his elder brother? I'm I'm not saying that he was. I'm just throwing it out there for people to to ask the question because I I don't know the answer. But what's interesting about Ghislaine Maxwell is we come
back to the word terror again. Terror Mar because she had the she founded the Terra Mar project in 2012 for the conservation of the Seas. And you've just seen in the Terra Carta that the then Prince of Wales, now King, wants to return 30% of the ocean, 30% of the land back to biodiversity. And the Maxwells were pouring a lot of money into it.
And I went into company's house to look at Terra Mar. Obviously since the arrest of and the imprisonment of Ghislaine Maxwell it has been dissolved. But there you can see the company's house entry for it. So you just the The thing is when you start to do a bit of research and you start to look at things, you end up with more questions than you do answers. And you think, well, where where
is all this money coming from? Was Prince Andrew fundraising for his brother's empire this sustainable initiatives. Terra Carter. Astra Carter is is Charles the saviour of the world? I don't know. That's a good place to end on Debbie. Let's just put the picture up on screen so that people know what
we're talking about. Apologise for using ABBC image here, but Prince Charles, the winged hero, he's he's the winged hero saving the world and he's going to become the centrepiece as a giant bronze statue of a remote Amazonian town. And he was actually shown a picture of this before it was produced and asked whether he was happy with it. And he he said yes. So it's Prince Charles. With what? The wings of an Angel? We've actually got some more pictures. Maybe we'll come on to the the
pictures in detail next time. But what was said about this Mauricio Bentes, which was the sculptor who sculpted this angelic statue of of Charles and it's his face, You know, when you look at it, it is, it is him, it is his face. And when you see the whole statue, you see these massive wings, and then he's got a loincloth on and he's standing or overarching a hill that's covered in skulls and he dominates it, You know, it's extraordinary.
So one of these statues has been erected in the rainforest. One was presented to him, a small one was presented to him by the sculpture and he was extremely pleased to receive it, by the way, and delighted with it. And then Tim Cohen, who's done a lot of work on Charles and and and the history behind King Charles, he's heard that there is a life-size or even bigger 10 cubic cubits, I think.
Is the size another one that's meant to be being put on top of the Third Temple if it's erected in Israel? So I'm just saying what I've heard and I'm just repeating what I've seen. But again, who knows? Brian, is he the saviour of the world or does he think he's the saviour of the world? I don't. Personally, I think he's he's the saviour of the world, but I don't think he's the saviour of the world.
Debbie, let's end there. It been a fascinating chat through just part of the information that that you've assembled to do with King Charles, the 3rd and and the Royal Family. I'm going to say to the audience thank you very much for joining us. Don't be shy if you've got comments, you've got information or you've got things that you think that we should Debbie and I should should be interested in, then get in touch, e-mail it through and also we'd say to you, please also give us
feedback on what we're doing. Do you think it's important? Is the subject important? We'd really like to know not only from UK column members whether we're hitting the spot, but we'd also like to know from people who aren't yet UK column members whether what we're saying is important for the not only the people in UK, but obviously people in people worldwide. You need to understand what this man is really up to and what's coming down the pipeline, Debbie. And there's more.
There's more. Yeah, let's end there. Thank you very much for that contribution. Thank you very much to everybody who's joined us today for this episode. And do give us that feedback because that helps us enormously see whether we're hitting the right spot. So we'll leave it there. Thank you. Bye. Bye. Bye, bye.