SUDDEN TERROR-Larry Crompton - podcast episode cover

SUDDEN TERROR-Larry Crompton

Oct 23, 20181 hr 10 minEp. 403
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

The original comprehensive case files of the East Area Rapist who became known as The Original Night Stalker. A serial rapist turned serial murderer, he held California in a grip of fear for way too long. Larry Crompton tells us of the attacks that began in Northern CA in 1976 that continued on until 1986 that we know of. Prior to Sacramento attacks there was a serial prowler called the Visalia Ransacker with over 125 break in prowlings under his belt. Detective Crompton had a feeling all of the attacks were connected and tried to tell jurisdictions across the state. Retired from Contra Costa County Department Larry has never quit searching for this serial predator. Now at long last Joseph James DeAngelo is the face of the man behind the mask. Presumed innocent until proven guilty the case appears to have been solved by a 100% DNA match. His name had become the Golden State Killer. Now what we look for are answers. Hopefully there are not more victims of this serial predator. This book originally released on paperback in 2010 was the first book out on a case that no one was talking about. Retired Lieutenant Crompton was compelled to write the story so we would not forget. Justice is on the way at last. SUDDEN TERROR: The True Story of California's Most Infamous Serial Predator, Golden State Killer, ONS aka EAR-Larry Crompton Follow and comment on Facebook-TRUE MURDER: The Most Shocking Killers in True Crime History   https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064697978510Check out TRUE MURDER PODCAST @ truemurderpodcast.com

Transcript

Speaker 1

Wait, the Lucky Land Slots. You can get lucky just about anywhere.

Speaker 2

It's your captain speaking. We've got clear runway and the weather's fine, but we're just gonna circle up here a while and get lucky. Oh no, nothing like that. It's just these cash prizes add up quick, So I suggest you sit back, keep your trade table up right, and start getting lucky.

Speaker 1

Play for free at lucky landslots dot com. Are you feeling lucky? No purchase necessary void, We're prohibited by Law eighteen plus. Terms and conditions apply. See website for details.

Speaker 2

Lucky Land Casino asking people what's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

Speaker 1

Lucky in line at the Delhi I guess ah, in my dentist's office more than once. Actually do I have to say?

Speaker 2

Yes? You do?

Speaker 1

In the car before my kid's PTA meeting? Really yes, excuse me?

Speaker 2

What's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

Speaker 1

I never win and tell.

Speaker 2

Well, there you have it. You can get lucky anywhere playing at lucky landslots dot com. Play for free right now? Are you feeling lucky? No, we're just necessary ONID. We're gona be my Law eighteen plus terms conditions.

Speaker 1

Playing you love wait the Lucky land slots. You can get lucky just about anywhere.

Speaker 2

It's your captain speaking. We've got clear runway and the weather's fine, but we're just gonna circle up here a while and get lucky. Oh no, nothing like that. It's just these cash prizes add up quick, so I suggest you sit back, keep your trade table up right, and start getting lucky.

Speaker 1

Y for free at lucky landslips dot com. Are you feeling lucky? No purchase necessary void. We're prohibited by Law eighteen plus. Terms and conditions apply. See website for details.

Speaker 3

Radio.

Speaker 4

You are now listening to True Murder, the most shocking killers in true crime history and the authors that have written about them. Geesy Bundy Dahmer, The Nightstalker DTK. Every week another fascinating author talking about the most shocking and infamous killers in true crime history. True Murder with your host, journalist and author Dan Zufanski. Good Evening, the original comprehensive case files of the East Area rapist who became known

as the Original Nightstalker. A serial rapist turned serial murder, he held California in a grip of fear for far too long. Larry Crompton tells us of the attacks that began in northern California in nineteen seventy six that continued on until nineteen eighty six that we know of. Prior to Sacramento attacks, there was a serial prowler called the Viselia Ransacker, with over one hundred and twenty five break

in prowlings under his belt. Detective Crompton had a feeling all of the attacks were connected and tried to tell jurisdictions across the state. Retired from Contra Costa County Department, Larry has never quit searching for this serial predator. Now, at long last, Joseph James DeAngelo is the face of the man behind the mask. Presumed innocent until proven guilty, The case appears to have been solved by a one hundred percent DNA match. His name had become the Golden

State Killer. Now what we look for our answers. Hopefully there are not more victims of this serial predator. This book, originally released on paperback in twenty ten, was the first book out on a case that no one was talking about. Retired Lieutenant Crompton was compelled to write the story so we would not forget Justice is on the way. At last.

The book they were featuring this evening is Sudden Terror, The true story of California's most infamous serial predator, Golden State Killer, Original night Stalker, a ka East Are Rapist, with my special guest, author and retired Lieutenant Larry Crompton. Welcome to the program, and thank you very much for this interview. Larry Crompton.

Speaker 3

Thank you, Dan, I appreciate this.

Speaker 4

Thank you very much. I really appreciate this, and this is going to be a real treat for the audience. Congratulations, by the way, on this incredible event for law enforcement in terms of America, a huge moment in history, never let alone true crime history. Congratulations on your involvement, your persistence, your dedication to this case. Congratulations on this arrest.

Speaker 3

Well, thank you. It took a long time to get there, but when it did, it found closure for a lot of victims in their families, and that's what it was all about.

Speaker 4

Yeah, it's amazing we use that word. So many people use that word closure, but I think this is as you it's an appropriate to be able to use that word, and I think even more closure will come as this person di'angelo goes trial eventually, soon, When I say eventually, April twenty fourth, twenty eighteen, as you say, forty two years later, Joseph James DeAngelo, seventy two years old was arrested. Where were you? How did you get notified? And maybe

just for background, did you know before this? But on the day April twenty fourth, twenty eighteen, how did you get the news? Who gave you the news? And tell us your reaction?

Speaker 3

Well, what happened? About nine o'clock that night, I was contacted by Richard Shelby, and Richard was on the Task Force in Sacramento and said that there was a rumor that he was arrested and I was in jail, and wanted to know if I had heard about it, and I said no, I hadn't, but I will check. And I called Larry Pool, the sergeant that I had met with the Orange County Task Force, and asked him if he had heard, and he said no, I hadn't, but he said, let me check. So he called me back

about fifteen minutes later and said it is true. He was arrested tonight and he is in custody, and yes, And I couldn't sleep that night, I couldn't close my eyes. It was just it was so awesome that, after all these years that had happened.

Speaker 4

Yeah, I like you say, it didn't sleep that night. The next day you were obviously anxious and excited and definitely curious to the details. What did you find out in the next day, in the following days, what did you find out about this D'Angelo and his arrest? What did you find out?

Speaker 3

Well, it took a while for me to find out. Obviously I was retired and was still in contact with some of them. But the night that I found out about it, I contacted Jane Carson, she was the fifth victim in Sacramento, and told her that he had been arrested, and she was in tears. So I had to find

out as much as I could. But I was in contact with Sergeant Ken Clark in Sacramento, and he told me that they had been watching him for a week and the DNA, the familial DNA, had connected several and they narrowed it down to and said that then they narrowed it down to one, and that one obviously was Joseph, And they said they followed him for a week and they watched them and then they got some more DNA

off of him and that mashed up even more. And then they videotaped them and then they waited for him until he come out of the house, and then they arrested him as he come out, and like I said at that time, that was the best way to do it, because what he wanted to do was to go back

in the house and obviously get a gun. When I was working the case, I had talked to psychiatrists and other people that were dealing with rapists, and what they told me was that if you come across him before he commits a crime, you're never going to put it together. Is going to be so good that you'll never know. If you come across him after he commits a crime, he will kill you or he will kill himself, but

he won't be taken. And I lived with that thought all those years, and then when I saw how they did it and the way they did it, I thought, yep, psychiatrists were right on course, they knew what he was, so it was exciting to know how they did it. And then I saw him when saw him when he went into court the first time and in the wheelchair, and then once he found out what they knew, about him. Things have changed, and I still don't know when he's

going to ever say anything. And hopefully we'll learn from him what we need to be looking for when we come across somebody like him.

Speaker 4

HM, what was the I talked to our mutual friend and Penn and and she has written extensively about this case in her involvement with her aunt and uncle Lyman and Charlene Smith, and she spoke extensively of the support that she had through this with specifically you in terms of your empathy and compassion and just understanding about what it would be like and the answers that these people needed to have even if there is not an answer,

but or the reassurances. Other than Jane Carson, and I mentioned Lori, Anne and Penn Aka, how many of the victims did you interact with and for how long? Tell us a little bit more about that contact with those people and what that was like.

Speaker 3

Well, when I was on television one time and then I wrote the book and I was contacted by Jane Carson, and I had a lot of talks with her and stayed with her, and I told her that she was a survivor, and I said, your history and what you went through. You need to put that in a book and get it out. And it's not just for rape victims, it's for victims of any crime. And what she went through and how she dealt with it and what she became was important. So she did. She wrote wrote her book,

Frozen in Fear, and it is fantastic. And then I was also able to be in contact with Michelle Cruz, she's sister of Janelle Cruz, the young lady that was murdered, and Debbie Domingo, the daughter of Sherry Domingo, and we've stayed in contact, and there really are the only victims

and families that I've stayed in contact with continually. And others I have dealt with, but not the same way that I have with these, and seeing what they went through and how they dealt with it, and it just made it so that I had to stay with it because I saw what they went through and what they needed.

Speaker 4

Over all these years. What could you What could you say to them that would keep them repeatedly calling you? What would and not be critical as many people would do, understandably that that there hadn't been arrest, Why not why not tell us? What should you possibly say to these people, and how did what was the tone of these conversations to be able to keep these people at least hoping well.

Speaker 3

I would tell them I knew that the investigations were ongoing, and that the ones that were that were involved at that time were one hundred percent into it and wanted this close, and they wanted it closed for the victims and their families. And they went through the same thing I did. For many years. I blamed myself and thought I needed to get this closed. I needed, I needed, and then it came to me, it wasn't about me.

This is about the victims and their families. So that's what I would talk to them about, about how they were dealing with it and how strong they were, and that those that were involved and were working on it were doing everything they could and that I just couldn't give it up and told him that I had to stay with it and anything that I could do for them, I would, And any time I heard anything, I made sure that it was given to Sacramento or to Larry

Pool down in Orange County to follow up on. And then I got involved with three civilians down in Sacramento that were also involved in the case cases, and they were involved because they were in the area when he was hitting and then they saw me on TV and saw my book and got it. So I was in con with them, and I knew that they had such a close contact with Sacramento Sheriff's Office, with the detectives there, So anything that I had, I made sure that I got to them and they could work on it and

get information back to me. And those three kept the case going and would not give up on it. And Melanie Barbo and Kay Gilbraith, Robert Neville, they just were so involved in this that they were the ones that kept the case going. They just wouldn't let it go and they made sure that Sacramento was on top of everything that they come up with. So what I've said all along, law enforcement is not going to be solving crimes by themselves. They need the civilians to be involved.

And that's what happened here and it was because of that that it was finally solved. And have to give credit to those people that stayed with it. And Richard Shelby, the retired detective from Sacramento, couldn't give up on it. He put his book out and just Paul Hol's criminalists from Sacramento or from Contra Costa. He stayed with it, and Larry Poole couldn't give up on it. Ken Clark, Paul Belly from Sacramento, they stayed with it. So it was that that finally solved this case.

Speaker 4

They could have just looked at your book that you published in twenty ten, but that's not the extent of your input in this case. And with those people like Pool and Paul Holes that you mentioned from the FBI in Contra Costa County, tell us more about this relationship with Paul Holes and at least when he came on board and his interest in this case and your at least assistance in helping him understand this case.

Speaker 3

Well, what happened was Jim Evans was the detective in Sacramento that I worked with very close. He came down to our county and told us about the East Area rapist and at that time there had been thirty seven attacks and we knew nothing about it. And so I started working with Jim Evans. And then Jim called me one time and he said that he heard of a double homicide down in Santa Barbara and said that he called Santa Barbara, and they said, don't know what you're

talking about, and so he ran it by me. So I called Santa Barbara and I got the same thing back, that, no, we don't know what you're talking about. We have nothing like that. So it just so happened that the sheriff sent me down to a class down in San Diego at the university, and there happened to be a Santa Barbara officer in the class, and I got talking to him and he said, oh, yeah, we did. We had a double homicide and he said, Robert Offerman and Deborah Manning.

And he said, and just before that, we had an attempted rape where the people got away. And I said what and he said yeah. And I said, well, gosh, we knew nothing about that. So I got those reports and Jim Bevans and I went over them and we in our minds, yes, their murder, their attempted rapist was our rapist, but nobody would believe us, and nobody wanted to get involved his apartment. My department said, no, he's left our area, he's no longer ours, and no, it's

not the same person. So what happened was in two thousand it was. Paul Hols called me and said that he heard that I had been on the East Area Rapist Task Force, and he said, I'm a DNA expert here at the lab, and he said, if you can give me some names, I'll do the DNA because back then we didn't have DNA when all this was going on, and we only knew that it was the same person committing the rapes because of the way that he did it,

and there was no doubt in our minds that. But I gave him three names and he called me back a while later and said, yeah, I joined two of them. And then he called me back another month later and said, yeah, all three of them have the same DNA. So I said, okay, Paul, I know that down in southern California, I know of five homicides, and I said, I can't get any cooperation, but if you can get a criminalist down there that will work with you, I know they have evidence, and

I know that their murderer is our rapist. And I said, if you can get them to cooperate with you, I know it's there. So he called me back about seven months later and he said, no, they didn't have five homicides, said they had ten and we just joined six of them, so that was exciting. And he said that Orange County wanted me to fly down there and talk to them. So I contacted Orange County and the sheriff wanted me to come down and I told him, I said, I

have all the reports of Northern California attacks. And I said, if you want, you can send your detective up here. I have the contact up here. We can go to the sheriff's department and get copies of them. And he said, no, we want you down here. He said, we'll pay to have you and all the reports. So I flew down there with them and met with their task force and stayed there for a couple of weeks going over everything.

And that opened up the investigation because they didn't know who they were looking for or what type of a person they were looking for. But after looking at the reports from Northern California, it gave him a better idea. And I didn't know at the time, but they had already done DNA on some of theirs down there prior to that, and so that part was already there and it was just a matter of connecting it. And then

trying to find out who that would connect too. But that got the investigation going and opened it up north and south, and that really helped.

Speaker 4

After this, you also employ every other strategy to be able to move this investigation forward, like you say, with the FBI, and with that connection and the DNA connection, it becomes much more cohesive and much more viable investigation

for everyone. When you were doing other things like A and E reached out to you Bill Curtis and Cold Case Files and then later some other television programs and then so tell us a little bit about that outreach and what the purpose of that was and why you were wanted to be involved with that, and before we talk about other things like reaching out to Kim Rosmo, geographical profiler.

Speaker 3

Yeah, well, it was with me. I couldn't get it out of my mind. I had to stay with it, and I was contacted by uh several television programs and radio and UH newspaper and matter of fact, Michelle McNamara contacted me and UH she did a a thing for a magazine on me, and so that opened it up so that I was contacted by many people, and UH really got involved in it that way, and I just wanted it to keep on going, and UH couldn't let it die. And it was just one of those things

that UH stayed in my mind. And like I said, UH, I kept thinking that Uh I was supposed to cl was that case. I was supposed to catch him, and I failed, and I failed, And then it finally dawned on me that it wasn't about me. It was about the victims and their families. So anything and everything that

I could do, I stayed with it. And I was very, very fortunate to be able to work with Larry Poole and Ken Clark and Paul Belly, and with those three working the case at the same time, I knew that there was a good chance that it would eventually be solved.

Speaker 4

You talk about I mentioned Ken Rosmo or Kim Rosmo pardon me, you have in the book which is rereading it again after interviewing you in twenty twelve that it's very interesting what through his geographical profiling, using zip codes and that information into a program and trying to pinpoint where the perpetrator was residing during those attacks. It was interesting to see what he said in light of DeAngelo's arrest. Your idea that didn't you believe he still probably resided

in Sacramento. What is it interesting to see what Kim Rosmo had deduced so long ago? In two thousand and.

Speaker 3

Three, Oh yes, I was contacted by Mike Weymouth, who was a detective with Contracosta, and he and I had worked together, and he was in patrol when I was on the task force. And Mike is the one that contacted me and told me about Kim Rosmo and said that he was an excellent person to deal with this. And Kim did put a lot of time into it and felt the areas where he would be, And in all those years, I felt that he was still in Sacramento.

I couldn't get out out of my mind that he was in Sacramento, but couldn't come up with any any proof or anything else. But with what Kim decided him, what he showed and what he gave me, everything just fit. And thought that because of that we'd be able to find out something. But because of the way that some things go, we couldn't get names or anything else from

different phone calls and things like that. But it still still helped, and it narrowed it down to areas and he felt the same way I did that that d' angelo, even though we didn't know who D'Angelo was, that he was in Sacramento and worked out that way.

Speaker 4

You write in the book, well, before you know who is going to be the perpetrator, that the police departments are praying and hoping that it's not a member of law enforcement that's the perpetrator. In this you're a member of law enforcement. So I mean, in the light of this, this is a victory. This is an incredible victory. How

surprising was it for you? I mean in the book you talk about that it looks like you've narrowed it down that he has military training, and you give the evidence for that, and that's been discussed, But how surprised were you that he was a police officer? And just what was your response when you found that out? Would you think?

Speaker 3

Well, to be honest with you, it didn't affect me that much in all those years. I felt that because of the way that he acted and because of his knowledge about guns, he had to have some kind of a background, and I felt that he was either in the military, or family was or possibly family that was in law enforcement. And I just felt that the knowledge that he had and the way that he talked about the weapons and the fact that he had different weapons.

He had to have some kind of a background. And I was in internal affairs for several years, and unfortunately I was involved in several deputies being fired for misconduct or other things. So you know that no matter what the profession is, there's a chance that they're bad ones. And doesn't matter whether it's teachers or ministers, it doesn't matter. It can happen anywheres. And the fact that it happened to be somebody that had been in law enforcement, even

though it was for a short time. The only thing that I got out of it, and the ones that I talked to got out of it, was they were just happy that he was caught, and the fact that he was law enforcement did not affect us that way. We were just glad that he was caught.

Speaker 4

Oh no, I didn't mean it, but in that way, what I meant was in when you've racked your brain to say who is this and other people have done criminal profiles to say who this person might be? Who is he likely to be? When you realize it's okay, a seventy two year old person, but you realize he was a police officer. Briefly, does that contribute to any of the Aha, how he got away with it, how he's such an effective rapist and killer for so long?

Speaker 3

No, to me, it was different. It was because he was in law enforcement. Why wasn't it brought to somebody's attention and the fact that where he was when it was happening. And one of the reasons I wrote the book was that I was hoping somebody would read it and say, I know somebody that had been in those

areas at that time. And what we find out now, Joseph Giangelo was in those areas at that time, and it was very obvious that he was in those areas areas, and as law enforcement, I think that he probably in his patrol car, did prowl areas to know where he was going to go. But nobody ever seemed to have even noticed a patrol car. And in most people's minds, when they see a patrol car and it goes by, it doesn't stay in their mind. So he had every

opportunity to do what he did. And when I learned about the rapes that happened in Sacramento and went through the reports, and I thought, there's no way that somebody could have started out with that kind of a plan. He had to have something prior to that, and I thought maybe he had been arrested for rape and went to prison and got a better system to work on.

So I got all parolees from a six month period prior to the first Sacramento attack, and I had between seven and nine thousand all together, and my partners and I would go up to Sacramento and go through all the paroles and eliminate them for different reasons that they were in prison during some of the rapes, or different sizes and stuff like that, and we narrowed it down to about forty five. And those forty five I couldn't contact, never found their parole officers, didn't know where they were,

and a couple of them really looked good. And that was one thing that when D'Angelo was arrested, that was one thing that unfortunately was in my mind. I'm glad he wasn't one of my parolees because if he was, yeah, then I would have missed it. And and that's not the way that I should have looked at it. Again, I was thinking of me and that uh oh, I fouled up I didn't. I didn't and had to get

it in my mind that that's not it was about. Uh. It was we eliminated thousands of names over the years, and some of them really look good andy, but some of them we had to work on and and UH worked on him for months before we could eliminate him. And but those are things that you do, and uh, it just stays with you. And and that's what uh, like I said, for years, I would wake up in the middle of the night, what did I miss? What

they do wrong? And just just comes to you finally that no, it finally did happen, and it happened for the right reason. It happened so that the victims and their families could finally find closure. And yes, it probably will be another year or more before he goes to court, and so it's going to take a lot. But I really would like to know what was in his head and what did we miss and what could we have done better? And I don't know if he'd tell us or not, but I'd like to like to be one

of the ones talking to him. But unfortunately I'm retired, so that won't happen. But that's what it's all about.

Speaker 4

Absolutely. We're gonna just uses as an opportunity Larry to stop for a second to talk about our sponsor, and we're going to talk more about the origins of Sudden Terror and all of the things in the investigation and what you put in Sudden Terror, and why tonight's episode is brought to you by Ring. Ring's mission is to make neighborhoods safer. You might already know about their smart video doorbells and cameras that protect us.

Speaker 1

With the Lucky land slots, you can get lucky just about anywhere.

Speaker 2

It's your captain speaking. We've got clear runway and the weather's five. But we're just going to circle up here a while and get lucky. No, no, nothing like that. It's just these cash prizes add up quick. So I suggest you sit back, keep your trade table up right, and start getting lucky y for.

Speaker 1

Free at Lucky landslopes dot com. Are you feeling lucky? No purchase necessary void We're prohibited by Law eighteen plus. Terms and conditions apply. See website for details.

Speaker 4

Millions of people everywhere. Ring helps you stay connected to your home anywhere in the world. So if there's a package delivery or surprise visitor. You'll get an alert and be able to see, hear, and speak to them all from your phone. That's thanks to the HD video and

two way audio features on Ring devices. We received our Spotlight Cam battery, a battery powered security camera with LED spotlights and siren and I mean a siren, a motion activated security light with an HD camera and automated recording and two way talk. And it was bright enough I swear to light up our entire backyard and we got a big backyard. Two hundred and seventy degrees of motion detection, super easy follow instructions. I installed it easily and fairly quickly.

Pressive HD picture, like I say, lit up the whole backyard when we tested it. My wife and I now feel very very secure with our Ring Spotlight Cam. As a listener, you have a special offer on a Ring starter kit available right now with a video doorbell and motion activated flood like cam. The starter kit has everything you need to start building a ring of security around your home. Just go to Ring dot com slash murder.

That's Ring dot com slash murder. We talked about Arry, about all of the things that you were doing, the networking that you were doing, the people that recognized and realized that you were an asset and a valuable asset in moving this investigation to the next level to try to find closure for the victims. As you said, you realize that when you got caught up in that it was about you at all, then you realize that it

really was about the victims and closure for them. When you wrote this book in twenty ten, was again after you were retired. What was the goal of the book, What was the purpose of the book at that time.

Speaker 3

Well, I started writing the book while I was still working, but I couldn't put the book together because, like I said, nobody would believe me that the murders and the rapes were connected. So I just didn't feel like I wanted the book out there at that time. And then once I found out about the murders and was able to join that, and then was able to get some of

the reports, then I put the book together. And I only wrote that book for that one reason, to get it out there, so that somebody would come up with a name, they would see where these acts were taking place and how violent they were. And during the time that this was going on, Joseph DiAngelo was not the most active rapist in California. He was the most violent, and in every one of his attacks, the people, the

victims knew that they were going to die. In their mind, he was going to kill him, and he made sure that they knew that on every one of those attacks. It wasn't until the sixteenth attack that there was a man in the house. After the fifteenth attack, the newspaper come out and said that there'd never been a man in the house. So obviously he read the newspaper and the next one there was a man in the house.

And then he started putting dishes on the man's back and telling them if I hear these rattle, I'll kill your wife, I'll kill you, cut off the ears of your child, bring him to you. That type of thing, his whole thing. And I went and with a doctor at the Vacaville Medical Center and I gave her some reports and she worked with the rapists that were in custody and asked her to go over the reports. And then I went back a week later to talk to her and she said, yeah, I've met with my rapist.

You had better catch him. He wants to kill and he's going to kill And I asked her, and I said, well, why hasn't he. I didn't tell her about the two that were murdered in Sacramento, and I just asked her, why hasn't she And she said, he hasn't found the justification yet. Once he finds the justification, he's going to kill. And she said, my rapist in here said that he's given them a bad name. And I said, given them a bad name, and she said, well, you got to

understand they don't think that they hurt anybody. They're doing it for sex. This person is not doing it for sex. He's doing it for the terror that he could put in their minds. And he's doing it because he wants to kill him. And what we found out was after the last attack in my area that people got away.

The reason they got away is because all these attacks now were in the newspaper, so they knew what was going to happen, and they worked out a plan that if they were attacked, there was an escape route and

if they could get that escape route, then they'd get away. Well, very very fortunate the way that it happened that time, the man woke up when the rapist was just putting his ski mask over his face, so he didn't have a gun in his hand, and the man woke up yelling and shouting at him, screaming at him, and it

got the rapist confused. It gave the wife an opportunity to hit the escape route and to get away, and once the husband realized that she was free, that he did the same thing, and then the rapist got away. Then when he hit down in Santa Barbara the first time down there, again the people got away. That was his justification. No one was going to get away again. And that's when he started murdering each and every one of them. And going through the reports, you could tell

that sex was not his number one priority. It was the terror that you put in their minds. And just about all of the women said that he never never had a full erection. They could hear him lubricating himself all that, so that's not what it was. And again the doctor at the Vaculo Medical Center, she was right. Once he found that justification, that was it. No one was going to get away from him again.

Speaker 4

You talk about all along in this book that you have to reassure people because bizarrely the people the man feels guilty that he didn't do more. When he's told he's tied up, he's restrained, he's got dishes on his back, he's been threatened, and yet still you have to talk to these people. You came up fairly quickly without I didn't see any background that would make you be able to do this, but you came up with the idea that you better tell them something. What did you tell

these husbands after attack? What did you tell these people.

Speaker 3

In talking to them? I tell him, I know that in your mind, your number one priority was to save your way for your girlfriend. But if you had done something, he would have killed you. The rape. Yes, it's bad, it is very bad, and it's going to be hard to live with, but you're still living. And if you had fought him, there's a very very good opportunity for him to do what he wanted to do, and that was to kill So I would talk to him and tell him, you've got to deal with it, knowing that

you did every You did everything you could write. And I know it was difficult for many of them. Many of them ended up in divorce. And because I couldn't deal with the fact that they did not take care of their wife, and I tried to get that in their mind that you did the right thing by dealing with it the way that you did, and now just try and work together and deal with it that way.

And I know it was very hard, and but I saw in talking to them, I knew what was in their mind, and I knew the fear that uh that was there, and I knew that their number one priority in their mind was to save their loved one, and in most cases, uh, in their mind, they didn't do it. And it was hard to get them to uh to understand that. And and uh it would be hard for me to understand it if it had happened to me.

So uh, very very difficult. But uh, I spent as much time as I could with them, talking to them. And like I said, when I finally met with Jane Carson and got to go through her life and what she went through and uh, how she dealt with it, and then I got it into my mind that yes, it can happen, they can get through it. And her book is one that, like I said, victims need to read and know that they can survive and can deal with things.

Speaker 4

You also, maybe we can talk about this now that we talked about and pen Aka or Laurie, Lori Anne, her relatives, Charlene and Lyman Smith. She has a different relationship with you in terms of she's not your average victim because of her being an author and a journalist and having a little bit different approach to how she would exist as a survivor, her survivor survival techniques. Tell us just a little bit about your interaction with her.

Speaker 3

Well, when when I first met up with Laurie and went through what was on her mind and that with Lyman being murdered the way that he was and Charlene and for her to be part of that family and know what was going through her mind. And she started telling me what she was doing, and she was writing a book and about the family and what families go

through and what they do. And I found that she was so involved in trying to get this out for people to look at, to let them know what a family does go through and how important it is to deal with it. Now important it was to find closure

and very very very dedicated young lady. And it was it was good in reading her book to find out what went through the mind of those family members like that, and it proves to all of us in law enforcement how important it is to solve these crimes and get that final closure.

Speaker 4

In your original book, you did something so in true crime at least, it's unusual and untypical. Why is part of your book? I mean, you have all the descriptions, and you got the cooperation. I was going to mention too, you've got all the cooperation with these people when it was time to put out this book. This graphic stuff that has to be released. So you had that trust from those family members to be able to put that

in the book and tell them why you needed. They needed, everyone needed to have that in the book to move this forward to maybe jar someone's mind to again details that could help. This is all from the commitment from everyone involved. You as one of the early, the earliest people pushing this investigation forward. Why is some of the book fictionalized? Tell us what the purposes of some of the book fictionalized?

Speaker 2

On?

Speaker 4

What parts are well?

Speaker 3

Because I wasn't involved in the first forty first thirty seven attacks, knew nothing about those attacks. I got the reports, but I had never never talked to those detectives, never talk to any of those victims, So I couldn't I didn't want to use the detective's names, and I didn't obviously would not use the victims' names except in the uh in the homicides because that is out there, but uh, in the rape, the victims' names are not out there,

So there's no way I would do that. And the only thing that that I put in there was that I got from the reports themselves, the initial reports that were written, and and also in talking to Sergeant Jim Bevans with Sacramento, and that's where I got the information from. And once it was out there, and a lot of the things that I put in the book also was articles from the newspapers. When they finally did start putting

it into the newspaper. The first several attacks, they didn't want it out there, uh, to let the rapists know that they were looking for him, so uh, they didn't want it in the news. And then once it got in the news, and obviously that uh, that increased it. But other than that, the only thing that U the only thing I did differently, I tried to put a little humor in the book to break it up a little bit and also to show how police officers do work at times and what they go through and how

they deal with it. And what we found out during all this was that very very few UH departments did cooperate and did work together, and that was that was the bad thing back then. What you did yourself stayed there. And when when I finally was on the task force and started working, I went down to the Berkeley to talk to a detective down there that was working the Stinky Rapist and we knew about the Stinky Rapist and

we knew he was hitting in that area. And while I was talking to him, he told me that San Jose had been hit twice by a rapist and we knew nothing about that. And I get talked to him and I said, well, how come we didn't know about it? And he said, well, you got to understand, he said, with San Jose, if the rape victim does not know who the rapist is, they don't investigate it. It's just

put off to the side. And I couldn't believe that any department would work that way because I had worked several rapes in my career, and prior to doing this, I was involved in him, and I thought, how can any department worked that way? UH. It's important UH for those victims and uh but he said, well, they're so busy down there, they just don't have the time. And that's the way that it was. But like I said, uh before I said, uh, D'Angelo was not the most

active rapist. He was the most violent. But uh we had at that time in California. He had the wooly rapist, the early morning rapist, uh, pillowcase rapist, uh stinky like I said, the car Key rapist, San Diego PD East San Diego rapist, and uh some of those were never caught. Uh some of 'em were caught uh uh and sent to prison. One was uh rested, sent to prison, got out and went back east and was arrested back there

for rape. So it's uh, it's I it's something that you look back on and you think what was going on and the fact that we weren't cooperating with each other. Like I said, I was very very very fortunate to be able to work with Jim Evans with Sacramento and Larry Pool with Orange County, and we did work together and we did not keep anything from each other. But uh that was different than uh most agencies and uh uh even in my U I in my County. Uh. When he hit in Walnut Creek, they told me they

didn't need my help. The first one that they hit in Wallet Creek was a seventeen year old that was babysitting, and I went and talked to her and found out that she had not baby sat there for two months, so he could not have known. And so I said, that's not who he was after. He's after somebody else in your neighborhood. And they said, we don't need your out. And a week later they did hit, and he hit a thirteen year old, and that's the one he was

after the first time. So it's that lack of cooperation that really hurt us back then, and I'm hoping that today it's different. And like I said, we knew nothing about the rapes and Sacramento and even in Davis, which was only a few miles from us, we did not know anything about him because if you didn't live in the town or get that newspaper, you didn't hear about it. Today, if a dog is bitten back in New York, it's

in the paper the next day out here. So it's different now, but back then it was very difficult.

Speaker 4

You talk about cooperation and the ultimate cooperation is what led to this arrest and capture and this incredible use of the familial DNA. Did you go through a what regular citizens can do and that innovation? Obviously when we talked about in the very beginning you found out you sure didn't get a call from the FBI, you but you were, you were you found out. Tell us more

about prior to this the last year. We'll say, it seemed to me in dealing with Ann Penn that the FBI was doing to me, it seemed an unpreceded, unprecedented in my mind, outreach to the public. It seemed like they were very very confident as well that there would be an arrest without giving away what they were doing, but everybody still has seen progress with DNA technology. Did

you sense a renewed interest that something was afoot? What did you feel in that, say, in the last year or previous to this, in the last while, did you see any change? Did you anticipate anything? What was that? Did you see anything or was it all my mind?

Speaker 2

No?

Speaker 3

I did when the FBI got involved and put out the reward, and I thought this is going to open it up. Unfortunately, when the rapes were going on a lot of times citizens could have called in things and didn't. One heard a window being broken at the neighbor and thought, oh, they're not home, so nobody can get hurt. They came home later that night and the rapes attacked them. But

that's what was going on then. But once the FBI got involved and did have their meetings and did put it out there, I thought, this is going to open it up, and now maybe we can get something. And again with the FBI, it doesn't matter what county or what state even they do have that cooperation and we weren't having that cooperation among departments. So I thought this was going to open it up and going to help.

And the big thing was that because Paul Hole stayed with it because of the DNA, that's what kept it going and he kept trying to connect. And then when we got into the familial DNA. Now, since this has happened, I've heard of fifteen cold cases that have been closed now because of DNA. So we're going in the right direction. My feeling all along, I've said this many times that when a baby's born, if you put that DNA in

the system, is going to protect that child. If it's a body that's found later, you're going to be able to identify it and if it's kidnapped or killed or whatever, and it may even help cut back on crime. But if it's out there, if it's in there, like fingerprints, I got fingerprints off a lamp one time and couldn't

get it matched anywheres. And then when I got working with Larry Poole gave him that fingerprint, he did get it matched and the person was dead and he went back and exhumed the body and got the DNA and proved that it was not our rapist. But things like that can work, and if you can do it with fingerprints, DNA is even more important. But too many people think that's a yeah, that's a private thing.

Speaker 4

So I agree with you too about the when right away when they did this through like I mentioned, just what regular citizens would be able to do a genealogy site like ancestry dot com if for reference to say, look for relatives for your your own family tree. And this is what law enforcement did be able to rest DiAngelo and solve these cases. Like you say, another fifteen cold cases, and that's incredible, and this is these are kind of slam Dunk. If there is such a thing

kind of trials, it's pretty hard to dispute. It's going to be impossible for him to dispute this at trial with so it's more slam Dunk would say in that, in that DNA and that privacy that you mentioned, I agree with you that for the good of again law enforcement, really the only thing and the best thing that has happened in the judicial system is the advent of DNA.

So the idea that they couldn't go into a private genealogy site to be able to search for that, I think that you given these kinds of results, privacy has to be I hate to say that, but I can't be fixed on the idea of privacy always under any circumstances. So I do agree with you it could be a very very good tool. Then again, we'd get into the subject of the effectiveness efficacy of some of these databases and compliance to put material into the database. Right.

Speaker 3

So, yes, Well, when I was working the cases, the only thing we had was secret status, and we knew that DeAngelo was a non secretor which Mitch couldn't get his blood from it, and that's how we eliminated a lot of people and uh, and some of 'em it took a lot, uh because they would get attorneys saying no, uh, you got to stay away from us. And and a couple of them I had to work on for a long time and U uh finally did get them to

chew on some gauze and we eliminated them. But uh, it would have been so much easier if we had known anything about DNA at the time, and UH was able to do that. But uh, there are there are ways that you work at and you work on it and uh, like I said, Uh, we eliminated thousands of names, and there were different ways of doing it, and uh

we uh did what we could. And UH, I'm just so so glad now for the victims and their families and know that hopefully within the next year they're going to find full closure and see what happens.

Speaker 4

What's very interesting too, is that the I think hopefully anyway, that the some of the glamour that comes with some of these killers, their status reverts and then they become

mythical and glamorous in prison after these convictions. I think it's in everybody's the way he's been depicted, in the nature of his crimes that and I think just the and maybe I won't even mention it just out of respect for the audience, but that just about the description of him and his behavior crying, and there is nothing. It would seem only the insane would think that this guy was admirable in any way, the kind of person you would contact and the kind of person that would

gain some kind of following. Don't you think this is well like, not the candidate for turning this into a sexy criminal post trial at all.

Speaker 3

No, it's like I said, with the doctor I dealt with at the Vacaville Medical Center and the rapist there. My feeling is that if when he goes to prison, the prisoners will hate him because the rapists that are in prison felt that they didn't hurt anybody. They committed crimes, but they didn't hurt anybody. But this person did and they're going to hate him. And because of who he is and what they learn about him, many of them

in there would like to kill him. And for that reason, and so it's going to be very dangerous for him and it's going to have to be taken care of that way. But we know that because as in California, there's no death penalty that's going to work there. So he will be in prison for the rest of his life, and it's going to be a rough time for him in prison.

Speaker 4

The book Sudden Terror came out in twenty ten, and this intended purpose was to move this thing forward. Obviously, you were this book. Was the information gained that was contained in the book help people like Paul Holes. Paul Holes spoke to you extensively. You were not to depict it like you took him under your wing or but it was essential that Paul Holes speak to you and understand read this book and understand these cases. It was

essential for him to do that. Not to give credit where credit was due, but it was essential that he read this and understand these cases and understand what you had to UH contribute to this case, wasn't it?

Speaker 3

Oh? Yes, and I and and like I said, I, I was working at the lab when when we first found out about this, and that's how he found out about me. UH. One of the UH people at the lab UH when he got involved in UH DNA said, UH told him that I was on the task force and said I would have the names of UH of victims and UH and if he contacted me, then then he could carry it on that way and that was very,

very fortunate. And then when he was able to uh deal with Southern California with Orange County and joined the DNA, and then he stayed with it after that, and UH that's what uh what finalized this. Uh you had to have uh those to stay with it. And like I said, even though uh Larry Poole retired, he couldn't let it go. He had to stay with it. And right to the

very end he was involved. And what people don't understand is that in law enforcement there's many times that these crimes get into your mind and you can't let it go. I had won in the crime lab a little fourteen year old that was kidnapped, raped and murdered, and I went out and processed the scene and then I had to go to the morgue and take the photograph of

them working on her. And I was up on the ladder with my camera looking down and Cindy Waxman was her name at the time, and I couldn't deal with it. I told my partner, you got to take this one. I'll take the next five, but I can't deal with it. And we thought we knew who it was, but they could never prove it. And then after I retired and moved away, I get a Sabena to go to court. They arrested him and the DNA did work. So that is good.

Speaker 4

Oh, it's getting closure for you, Larry.

Speaker 3

Yeah, you can't get it out of your mind and you stay with it.

Speaker 4

Well. I contend that this book, Sudden Terror, was what made these people recognize. You definitely instilled the fear, as you write, the fear that these people felt you felt. And from this book Sudden Terror, it captures that fear, that terror, and that was imparted to each and everyone that read it. All the detectives, all the civilians, all the people around you were influenced by your work and this contributed, as you did, to the capture of Joseph DiAngelo.

So again, congratulations and congratulations on this book, Sudden Terror, now available on Kindle. So thank you very much Larry Crompton for coming on and talking about Sudden Terror, the true story of California's most infamous serial predator, Golden State Killer onsaka East Area Rapist. Thank you very much Larry Crompton for coming on doing this interview it's been a pleasure.

Speaker 3

Thank you, Dan, I really appreciate what you're doing.

Speaker 4

Thank you very much. I hope to talk to you again real soon. Thank you very much. Larry, you have a great evening you too, Thanks, good night,

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android