When you make decisions for your company, you always look for the no brainers, and if you have a lot of mailing and shipping to do, stamps dot Com is the ultimate no brainer. It streamlines your process to make your business more efficient, which makes you less busy, mail checks, invoices, legal documents, books, and everything you need to keep your
business running. With stamps dot com, seamlessly connect with every major marketplace and shopping card if you sell online, schedule package pickups through the dashboard, and automatically see your cheapest and fastest shipping options from different carriers with rates up to eighty nine percent off USPS and UPS rates. And with the stamps dot Com mobile app, you can take care of mailing and shipping wherever you are, even on
the go. Make the same no brainer decision as over one million other business decision makers with stamps dot Com. Sign up at stamps dot Com with Code Program for a special offer that includes a four week trial plus free postage and a free digital scale, no long term commitments or contracts. That's Stamps dot Com Code Program.
Lucky Land Casino asking people what's the weirdest place you've gotten Lucky.
Lucky in Line at the Delhi. I guess ah in my dentist's office more than once.
Actually do I have to say?
Yes?
You do in the car before my kid's PTA meeting?
Really?
Yes?
Excuse me?
What's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?
I never win?
And tell well, there you have it.
You could get lucky anywhere playing at Lucky Landslots dot com play for free right now? Are you feeling lucky?
No?
We just necessaryiod where we're gon do my long eighteen plus terms conditions of pluck?
See what's every details?
Which was the season?
Hello?
It is Ryan And I was on a flight the other day playing one of my favorite social spin slot games on chumbacasino dot com. I looked over at the person sitting next to me, and you know what they were doing. They were also playing Chumba Casino. Coincidence, I think not everybody's loving having fun with it. Chumba Casino's home to hundreds at casino style games. You can play for free anytime, anywhere, even at thirty thousand feet. So sign up now at Chumbuck Casino dot com to claim
you're free. Welcome bonus. That's chumbuck Casino dot com and live the chumba line.
No necessary detail point. Where ever, if I lost terms conditions eighteen.
Plus, cheer and joy filled the town. Except for Scrooge with his perma frown. The gift of a Peloton bike touched his soul without doubt. When your workout's a joy, it's a joy to workout.
Work, work, Work Peloton.
The Peloton Bike starting at forty nine dollars a month. All access membership. Separate terms apply. See website for details.
Companies from A to Zoom run on Juniper Networks. With the ability to handle all that video driving from your six am with London to dinner time chats with Mom, it's no wonder the fastest growing companies trust Juniper. From data centers to Wi Fi driven by AI get results at Juniper dot net.
Between all the decorating, shopping and get togethers, finding the time to cook dinner during the holiday season can be difficult. HelloFresh makes it easy by delivering fresh ingredients, pre measured
to the right amounts, straight to your door. With HelloFresh, you can cook delicious time saving without having to wait in line at the grocery store, and you actually have time to enjoy them with your loved ones get started at HelloFresh dot caa and for a special holiday treat, use code Holidays sixteen to get up to sixteen free meals. That's Code Holidays sixteen at HelloFresh dot ca.
Since twenty twenty, we've lost thousands of active small businesses across Canada and that figure continues to grow every day. At Mazda, We've always believed that in times of need, it's important to support communities and help them get back on their feet. We're here to do that once again by supporting much love small businesses in your community this holiday season. Together, we can save our local legends.
Lock Holabia, You are now listening to True Murder, The most shocked Killers in True crime History and the authors that have written about them Gaesi Bundy, Dahmer, The Nightstalker d t K.
Every week, another fascinating author talking.
About the most shocking and infamous killers in true crime history. True Murder with your host journalist and author Dan Zufanski.
Good Evening. Stephen Williams is a writer and investigative journalist. His reputation was solidified by the continuing success of two books, Invisible Darkness, The Horrifying Case of Paul Bernardo and Karla Hamulka and Carla A Pact with the Devil, which were critically acclaimed as apocalyptic stories set in landscapes of suburban deviance. His nonfiction work has been compared to that of Norman
Mahler and Truman Capoti. It even has been twice arrested to do with his writing, once in nineteen ninety eight and again in two thousand and three, criminally charged with over one hundred counts of disobeying court orders and publication bans twice, but on trial over an eight year period between nineteen ninety eight and two thousand and five, and twice exonerated. The Attorney General, Michael Bryant, also sued Williams in two thousand and three as an enemy of the state,
alleging he was in possession of sensitive court documents. The lawsuits sought unspecified damages and the seizure of William's research and archives. Although the courts and police seized his computers and files, the lawsuit did not succeed. The dimension of these attacks on a writer are unusual even in totalitarian regimes, but in democratic countries like Canada and the United States, they are outrageous and speak to an ugly streak of
sublimated totalitarianism. These events not only turned the writer into a prominent character in the stories he was documenting too well for the authorities like but we're also vile attempts to denigrate that work and controversialize and even criminalize him. In recognition of saying, Stephen was given the Hellman Hammet Award by the Human Rights Watch. The award is presented annually to journalists who have been prosecuted by tutalitarian regimes
such as China and Iran. A book that we are featuring this evening is Invisible Darkness with my special guest, journalist and author Stephen Williams. Welcome back to the program, and thank you very much for greing to this interview. Stephen Williams, nice to hear from you, Dan, Thank you for returning to discuss Invisible Darkness again, the true crime classic, and our audience will find out why. Let's start because we have this introduction that really I think will be
a surprise to our American and international audience. I'll tell our audience where you were in your career when you heard about the arrest of Paul Bernardo, And when did you decide or we're enlisted to write about this case and become inextricably involved in this fified case of paulvin Iland color Homoka tell us about that.
Actually, it was a winter, very ugly winter up in the country, and I was sitting at my desk on a Sunday afternoon and thinking that my life wasn't going quite the way I wanted to go. I'd been working in the advertising and public relations, even though I'd written a dozen or fifteen feature magazine pieces, and then gotten distracted by the pursuit of money and capital of prestige, and thinking that it was time that I focused on something different. And I was going through a number of
newspapers when I want. I used to collect the papers and I look at them on a Sunday when I noticed an article in a tabloid newspaper, very long for a tabloid journal, A four five folio page described arrest to Paul Bnardo in Saint Catharines, Ontario, which is very
close to the American border. It's about a ten minute drive from Niagara Falls, both Canadian and Americans, and a sort of depressed town because it was reliant on the auto industry, and that was in some disarray at that point, and the idea that this sort of you know, well educated accountant person had been arrested suddenly in Saint Catharine's for at that point, all that was no one was that he was being arrested for the Scarborough rapes, a
series of rapes that started in nineteen eighty seven and included in the early nineteen nineties that he was being arrested for. Most in the bottom parts of the article, it described the fact that he lived in Saint Catherine's with his young wife, who was a veterinary clinic assistant in you know, native of Saint catherine'es. And I thought to myself, there's something wrong with this situation. There's being wrong with this scenario. Serial rapists are very rare at
any rate in criminal history. But the idea that this guy was down there living with a young, attractive woman and was in fact married to her. And I just decided to write a note to half a dozen publishers that I knew, saying, you know, the real question here is what was this woman doing while this man was out raping and pillaging?
Right?
The real question to be answered is that question. It was about a paragraph or maybe a paragraph and a half, the shortest thing I think I've ever written, and because that really struck me, so I sent it out to a half a dozen publishers. This is a Sunday afternoon in those days, by facts, and on Monday I had three authors do a book, plus an offer from an international publisher who said that we would do things to make sure that we got an American and the English deal.
So that's how it started. I was reading some newspapers on a dark winter afternoon up in the country, and there you go. The one thing to make clear is that there were two or three other newspaper people who did books on the case eventually, but no one had ever asked a question about the woman, and I didn't know what the situation was with her, or if there even was a situation.
Let's start with because we can't go right to the beginning, and a lot of most people have a really good sort of famework of what this story is about, but of course your book goes much much further. Let's talk about the situation with Vince Bevan at the same time, the Scarborough rapist, as you said, he was on the
loose from eighty seven till ninety four nineties. So let's talk about the situation in what we call the GTA, the Greater Toronto area now about six million people or so, and we talked about You've mentioned the Saint Catherines are a little small place outside of Toronto near Nagara Falls. So let's talk about the Green Ribbon Task Force that's assembled at the same time that Vince Bevan is in Saint Catharines.
Right. Saint Catherines even then was sort of a bedroom community to Toronto, and that's how it's located geographically. A great number of people that lived in the nicer parts of Niagara on the lake where the Shaw Festival is very close to Saint Catherines. A great number of people commuted to Toronto or were ex Frontonians living in the nice area of the Nagare Parks and Niagara Falls, all
that sort of thing. The interesting thing about Vince Bevan, who was eventually made the head they're the chief of the Green Ribbon Task Force, the task force that they established to look into what became multiple strange sexual homicides, was basically a hometown boy from that area whose father had been a policeman and basically a policeman's son from a policing family who was one of the few guys who had gotten an education and actually had a university
degree and had sort of become involved with information technology it, you know, and police applications for it. And somehow over a period of some months, because the soul was a mystery,
they didn't apprehend Lenardo immediately. The story goes back to even years where he was free and inexplicably free, and the MAgric Regional Police where Vince Bebin was employed, were not getting anywhere, etc. But at this point end time when he was arrested, he had been made the head of the Green Ribbon Task Force, which was a task force that refused to have anybody from the Toronto Police
Force involved. The Green Ribbon Task Force was formed from a series of smaller police forces in and around the region Hamilton, Burlington, Peel, whatever. But the Toronto Police Force, who were the people who actually identified Lenardo as a rapist, would refuse to have anything to do with this task force that was formed under Vince Babin.
You have a regional task.
Force that is and thickly set up against the major police forts in the whole region, which is the Toronto Police Force. It's like setting the New York Police Force against you know, the force in New Jersey or Connecticut or something. Right, Sure, so you've got this guy hang up a task force that has twelve or fourteen different police force members working in the task force. It's in an antithesis to the force that's actually caught the forensic evidence that brought Bernardo to their attention.
Finally, now let's talk about Bernardo is questioned. And so let's go back to when Bernardo is questioned, not arrested, but questioned. Who does the questioning, What do they ask him, what do they get from him? And then what is his reaction and the conversation with Carla, because I think, well, we know that is important in this story.
Well, it's certainly interesting prior to his arrest, which if I'm not mistaken, it's a long time ago. I mean it was prior to the oj Simpson trial in nineteen ninety five, so I think it was in nineteen ninety three. But prior to Bernardo's arrest, he was interviewed once as in Toronto Police way back in nineteen ninety and the Toronto police that interviewed them. They were interviewing on the basis that he resembled composite sketch of the Scarborough rapist.
He had been raping women in Toronto, and that interviewed him for a number of reasons, partly because he was a character very much liked the detectives who interviewed him. He was about their age in Toronto. These two detectives interviewed in both were university educated. That happened in Toronto.
They were young, they're very good looking, attractive guy, and when they sat down to interview Bernardo, they had nothing except a few people saying he looked like a composite drawing, and when they looked at him, they thought, well, he looks just like us. So no one Tenna went up. And the problem was, in those days, DA testing was a prolonged issue, and they had hundreds of samples from various rapes and murders and whatnot in the forensic center
at the Toronto Police Force. And since these guys didn't have a feeling about this guy, the old samples they had continued to sit on there on the shelf and the lab. In the meantime, Bernardo walks away from this scenario, thinking that he's invincible because clearly there's nothing going to happen.
He goes down.
At this point, he has a relationship with Carla in Saint Catherines. He's still living with his parents in Scarborough. He goes down to Saint Catherines and tells Carla that he's the Scarborough rapist. Basically tells her that he's a Scarborough rapist and they've just interviewed and it was as hysterical about it, whatnot, and this and that, as does a coroner. So the sister's death is world accidental.
Or death by victation caused by you know, vomiting. So now you have a man who has committed a half a dozen, maybe eight or nine rapes in Scarborough, gotten away with it, at least just the way he sees it. Decided to move into his fiance in quotes house with her parents and with her help, successfully rape her younger sister. Except it wasn't that successful.
Given she died and now they're in a house is hysterical. Paul and Carlo decide to move out because the parents, naturally grieving and hysterical, decide that it's not the appropriate time for them to be married, but they're not having any of that. So they move out and they rent a house in a high end area of Agara Falls region down there and a sort of suburban area right on Lake Ontario called Port Dulusi. They rent a house there and then they continue on their way.
Now, for those people that are shocked by the rape, wedding present, Christmas present for Paul Bernardo, we're doing this out of order, but because this discovery doesn't happen to much much later, and so tell us what was their plan after Tammy had been accidentally killed? They've gotten away with it, but what is their plan after it? What do these two people cook up? And and you can go through what they did in the Indian and Tammy's
room with Tammy's clothing videotaping. Tell us a little bit about that before we talk about Jane Doe.
First of all, there's arguments to be made that Tammy Lynn's death was at least second degree murder. There's arguments to be made that neither of them intended her to die, But there's also a very strong legal argument could be made that they knew enough that their actions would produce death, so therefore it would be at least second degree murder. But that's besides the point, because they got got away
with that. The next project is that it's very hard to describe a lot of people in Hollywood and in television have had very great difficulty sort of even comprehending the aspect of the story. She decides her parents aren't worthy, they don't care about her enough, and she decides she'll move in with Bernardo in this sort of pink Cape cod style house in Port de Lucy on the water.
And actually I even have lost track of what came first and what came second, but certainly one of the next things that happened in the period of time that they were planning their wedding, which they were deeply engrossed in for a period of about four months. This incident, Tammy Lynn's murder, happened in December nineteen ninety and by end of April, if I'm not mistaken, they were married
in Port Dalusi in a old church and whatnot. But in between, Paul Bernardo did a young teenage girl in Burlington while he was out for license plates to steal and brought her home. Her name was Leslie Mahoff fifteen year old normal schoolgirl in Burlington, Ontario, and brought her back to this house they had in Port de Lucy, and for about a three day period, both he and
Carla sexually assaulted Leslie and then murdered her. So that happens, and they dismember her body in the basement, put her body part in case them in cement, and dump a reservoir that feeds the Saint Catharine's called Lake Gibson, and
go off to their wedding. And on the very day that they're being wed in a sort of white horse drawn carriage deal which includes one hundred of their closest friends and family, at a quite lavish sit down dinner at the Queen's Landing, which in Nagron Lakes, lovely hotel that many Americans were aware of. And during that very moment, the body parts are discovered in Lake Gibson by a fisherman.
Because Bernardo had been responsible for making sure that they had bought to put the body parts in needed time to coll as, and he didn't give it enough time, so a couple of the lids that contained these body parts separated in the water of Lake Gibson, and neither of them had done enough research into the Lake Gibson and how it worked reservoir, you know, raise it and go down according to the usage. Some of these cement blocks in which the body parts were based were close
and they separated and the fishermen found them. So the police came and found these body parts of someone they weren't even sure it was missing in you know, on the shores of Lake Gibson. So by the time the police figure out who the girl is, of course, there are a number of missing girls around the one hundred mile radius they figure out it. Leslie Mahaffi, Bernardo and Homolka have already gone on their honeymoon to Hawaii and
come back. So now we're at the stage where both of them think that they're uncatchable and invincible because nobody seems to know anything about what might have happened this poor girl. Leslie Mahaffy hemy Lynn situation is behind everybody, and now they're just living in this lovely house in Port de Lucy coming back from their honeymo very bizarre situation.
Tell us about the abduction of Christian French and Carla's participation in that.
Well, should we mentioned the fact that there's been Doe between that abduction, and I mean, we probably should bring Jane Doe in this. Absolutely the woman knowing is the young woman known as Jane Doe, because this is an astounding sort of fact in the story that shortly shortly after they returned from their honeymoon. Actually, you know what, I think, I think that Jane Doe factored in before
Leslie Mahafi was kidnamed. I think I somehow remember that Bernardo asserted that Mahaffi was reciprocal, sort of reciprocal gift for Jane Doe. But regardless, it's all in my book
and very I knew detail. At some point in this incredible insanity, Carla decides that she needs to do something for Paul, something special for Paul, and she lures a young girl that she'd met at the veterinary clinic and the pet shop she used to work at, who also is fifteen and strangely looks very much like Tammy Lynn,
her sister, dead sister. She lures her over to this house in Porteluci one evening and does to her exactly what she did to her sister, so that Paul could rate her sister with impunity, and that is she got more hal athane from the veterinary clinic and esthetic, which she well knew was very dangerous to use with anyone who had eaten anything or drunk anything, or at any other suppressants or tranquilizer. So whatever, she got exactly the same drug and used exactly the same pills. It was
helthane and the tamazepam or something a strong sedative. And she put Jane Doe down in their new house in Port Dealusia and called her husband on the phone that said, come home, dear, I have a present for you. And so they came home. And the other thing that I haven't mentioned is the video taped to all of this. They video taped tmmy Lyn. And now he comes home and finds her with fifteen year old you know, and the two of the rape and assault Jane Doe and
videotape the thing and this particulation. I think's pre dates there they're going on the honeymoon, because I think it's months after the death. It's less than six months to the death of emy Lynn and just a bit before Leslie Mahaffey is murdered. And so Jane Do doesn't die. She's fine, she's sick for codation wonders up, and then they go get married and they go on their honeymoon
to Hawaii, comeback. There's no consequences from anything that they've done, and time goes by, Paul restless, Carla goes and recruits Ame Doe again, and a kind of relationship between the three of them develops that last brought the summer of ninety one, whereby Paul and Carla keep encouraging Jane Doe to have relationships with him, but she won't any further
than giving Paul oral sex. So eventually they both get very frustrated and they actually put her down again the same way they did the first time before they're married, before the honeymoon, and this time Carlo perceives that Jane Doe stops breathing and calls nine one on the way she grew Tammy Lynn, but then calls them right back and says she's fine. So also learned no problem and no one fallows up on this, and so that incident passes.
Jane Don't walks away finally from this bizarre household and survives, and nineteen ninety two, the two of them decide that they need to find a new sex slave, and they plot to go out and kidnap a school girl Saint Captain's School, and that's when Christian French.
Is Christian French is abducted by the couple and how do they what's different or similar with what they're doing with Christian French.
A lot of water has gone under the bridge tace time. It's April nineteen ninety two, and the collusion because a lot of stuff has gone down between these two and tench is building and you know, things aren't perfect point she decides that it's imperative for her to assist him and calm him down because he's getting a bit disassociated. And they had to plot to kidnap an a schoolgirl.
And they go out on the street on a very nice afternoon, the Easter weekend, and they go cruising looking for someone to kidnap, and they see Christian French walking home from school. Her walk home from school, it's about five minutes. They pull off in a church parking lot and pretend that they're looking for directions, something that's happens very very frequently in Saint Catherine's because of the way
in which the city has been designed. And they work her heart and they kidnap her right in broad daylight and take her basically five or six minutes back to their house in Port Lousey and proceed to rape and over the Easter weekend.
Now, let's fast forward a little bit, because we're just Carla Hamalka gets the bright idea that the gig is up. What prompts her she's contacted by police. Let's get to that point. Let's fast forward to that point where she is contacted and makes the smartest decision of her life. Tell us what prompts this questioning of Carla, and what do the police say at that point and what does she do in reaction to that interview that questioning?
Right, the problem with this story is more Froz and probably French. She has killed, things are done. She's dump in a gully very close on a back road, very close to the necessary where Leslie Maffi has been, the first victim has been, the second victim has been buried.
And that Christmas in nineteen ninety two, somehow mister Bernardo was and he hits Carla with a one of those black steel flashlight to such an extent that her mother and other people realize that she's you know, she's in some kind of progression, and it's decides that she will leave bernardo household and she will go to her uncle's place and live in Brampton, and everything will be forgotten and everything will be fine. At least that's what's in
her mind. There's no background of battery or record of any kind of problem in their marriage up to this particularly moment in nineteen ninety two, after French is dead and things have gone haven't gone awry. Actually, nothing's happened to implicate anybody. They're none the wiser. But he dissembles, he's not problematic figure, he has no tolerance. Obviously crazy, but not legally so. And he hits her one night,
and that's their relationship. In other words, the first thing she doubt, she said, is leak, and she goes up
to live with her aunt and uncle in Brampton. In the meantime, the Metropolitan Toronto Police, the police who have not been in the Green Ribbon Task Force that was formed under Vince Bevin and has all this time VI investigated unsuccessfully and has twice interviewed Paul Bernardo and cleared him, as had the Toronto Police through and the Scarborough rape investigation, Toronto Police and the forensic lab in Toronto identify Bernardo as the man who is raped free of the twelve
fourteen victims of the Garborough rapists. Right, so they they have this is the definitive moment for the Toronto police. They finally hold the case. They got the guy and down to Saint Catherine's and put him under surveillance and decide they're going to arrest him in very short order. But of course do this have to trade general for
the state in Canada. The state is the province. The police in Toronto, like the police from New York, decide that they're going to go into a place New Jersey, and they're going to take somebody out from under the New Jersey police and rest them and take them back to New York to prosecute. Well, that isn't going to happen, and that the Trade General insists that the prosecution the
people involved in those decisions exists. That they put Bernardo under surveillance and decide what to do, and time evolves. In the meantime, Carla has left town and gone up to live in another small urban suburban development with her aunt and uncle about an hour and a half away from this place. So the Metropolitan Drown Police are very, very eager just to erect in. Never mind all of
this political constance about jurisdiction and whatnot. But Bevan and the Green Ribbon Task Force, the local people that have been charged with this, consistent that this is their caller that they need to get in. So there's a political issue involved here that's impossible to talk about. The bottom line is, as the Metropolitan Toronto Police are being held out, they decide that part of their job would be to
go and interview his estranged wife, which they do. They find her up in this suburb and they go up and interview her. Carla doesn't say anything to them about what actually has gone on. She doesn't confess, she doesn't do anything. But what she does realize is that she could be in deep shit. So they come up to visit her, and she talks to them, and in the process of talking with them, realizes that there's a problem here.
These people have Actually they're actually onto himvolved in these murders. And that's good for her because all she wanted to do is forget about all this stuff her mind. She just made a mistake. She buried the wrong man, so instead of coming clean with Toronto police, she shut and jives and the moment they leave, she phones a lawyer in Niagara Falls and happens to be a very prominent lawyer, perhaps the most senior lawyer in that area, who does
nothing but criminal law. She knows this man because his wife brings their dalmatians to the vet clinic where she worked, So she phones him and the wife organizes for her to come down and see his name is George Walker. Come down and be George. And she actually has the germinity to ask the detectives from Toronto that we're interviewing her to drive her to her appointment with George Walker amazing,
which they do of course. So story that is so complicated, although these kinds of stories seem to be in vogue now, or how else would he Thrones be in its six or how would the Wired have gone for seven? I mean, it is extremely complicated and nuanced. But at the root of it is the fact that policing it's a bureaucracy. It's not an effective, you know, force for security or deterrence bureaucracy. The moment that you get in more difficulty and more conundrum the moment you start mixing territories.
And Hi, I'm far Mohammed, host of Canadian Immigrants upcoming podcast First Generation.
And Hello, I'm Ramya ramad An editor of Canadian Immigrant.
In this series, I'll be sitting down with Canadian immigrants, each with their own unique story to hear about their journey. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts so you can listen to new episodes as soon as they're released. First Generation is brought to you by ms Rahi Developments, the award winning company that's redrawing Toronto Skyline.
An Espresso virtuo exceptional coffee at the simple touch of a button, a coffee to enjoy, to savor and to share all day and every day. Virtuo standards are meant to be broken.
Espresso. What else that's strict and police and of course the ministry of the the attorney generals of the prosecutor's office, whatever they're called, the various draidations in the ats or hear you bring those guys in and they have their agendas. So the bottom line is Carla goes down to this lawyer's office and from that moment in time, unstill the moment he walks into a court room to be given a twelve year sentence, not for sex crimes, not for murder,
but for two counts of manslaughter. Enough happens, and Baard's arrested by the Green Ribbon Task Force and Vince Bevin and of course charged only with the murders of les Imahafi and Christian French. And basically that's what Invisible Darts documents.
Rather very traditional true crime story that follows all of the characters, whether they're perpetrators, they're victims, or the very many vestating bullet in the Expert Witnesses program, the psychiatrists and the psychologists, the lawyers and the judges, the senior police, senior media. It's just an epic story of a disaster.
One thing we didn't touch on when we talked about Carla pack with the Devil, and it's interesting as well because it's one of the most fascinating cases ever written about is perfect victim. And I interviewed Carla Norton earlier this year about the incredible book The True Story of the Girl in the Box and the compliant victim of a sexual status. So please explain this because this is
a cornerstone for this book. It's a cornerstone to understand a little bit about the perfect victim story and how important that story is to this story.
That's a very interesting point because the compliant victim of sexual to say that is a fiction that the FBI profilers out of chronicle, manufactured.
Out of whole cloth.
And the basic idea is that there are certain women who are susceptible to sexual say this to such an extent that they marry them and then do their bidding. And this was very much a part of the government here, the prosecutor's opposite and the government very much part of their explanation, rationalization for letting Carla literally away with murder and grotesque murder, not just oh, I inadvertently murdered my
aunt because it was mad at her. All of these girls, with the exception of her sister, who is totally inexplicable, were strangers. There's no solace or no explanation in the idea. You know, the fact she was a battered woman and acting out of the battered woman's syndrome and therefore couldn't leave him or anything. The fact is Carla, the moment she was hit first, the first time she was hit,
she left the marriage. That's totally anesthetical to the diagnosis of a woman with postmatic stress disorder or battered woman's syndrome. But the greatest fiction in all of this stuff is that there's a certain kind of woman who is very susceptible to a sexual Say this, and the anomaly here is the compliant victim description, the compliant victim of a sexual Say this, and that's what the government decided was the best use of a theory in the case of
Carla Hamulka. It wasn't a question of what Vince Bevan, the head of the Green Ribbon Tesk Force, wanted, or the much more powerful and larger and confident Metropolitan Toronto Police wanted. It was a question of how the government was going to deal with the situation that was so high profile and so inexplicable that they quite figured out a resolution that was going to earn everybody. And then
somebody brought up this idea. It was then quite a new idea of the compliant victim of the sexual stay. That's one of the behavioral science. The behavioral hesed to call it behavioral science. It's behavioral fiction that comes out of Quantica. But those couple of detectives that worked with the FBI, Hazelwood, Douglass, who came up with it. I'm not sure if Douglass was already gone by that time.
A guy named Rynane Hazelwood, a few others had come up with this theory based on the interviews they conducted. The ten or twelve cases that don't have any real relationship to the details of this case had come up with this theory which had just it hadn't been published. It was in I can't remember what the academic journalists call it, but it was in review, peer review, and
it was about to be published. The idea of the compliant victim of the sexual say this, this was like a God said to our government, really, Vince Bevan and the Green Ribbon Task Force, because it gave them an explanation whereby they could excuse Carla for stuff that was inexcusable, right, they could rationalize inexcusable stuff to show the contrast in this trial is that now the government needs this deal, they need these facts to align.
With their theory. Again, this fictional theory you're talking about to explain because obviously she doesn't fit into the post PTSD, and she certainly doesn't fit into the vatid women syndrome by by the definition, by definition itself. Now, what's incredible about your book is that you have again factually having Carla testify and having and then having Bernardo testify is
unusual and incredible. As the prosecution witness star witness against Bernardo, the defense of Paul Bernardo wants to cross examine Carla
Hamlca to benefit Paul Bernardo, regardless of the deal. And so in a bizarre almost Twilight Zone type scenario where the government has their deal and she has basically her immunity, she's supposed to tell the truth and we won't get into all this memory convenient memory lapses that she has, but tell us about what Rosen exposes and by that time what everybody in this courtroom basically does know about Carla.
Well.
Rosen was Paul Bernardo's lawyer, and the the fact is that he didn't believe and no one believed that there was any meaningful resolution to happen at this trial or any meaningful revelation because as the prosecutor Ernie said a dressed to the jury, both these people are guilty at first degree murder. And I'm paraphrasing, but believe me, the transcripts bear me out. This is the opening to Bernardo
trial where Carla has been dealt with. She's already serving her twelve year sentence and for manslaughter, for two counts of manslaughter, but it isn't three counts because that would make her a serial offender, so she doesn't. She's not on three counts. She's on two counts, ensuing it twelve year bit, which would in Canada see her out if she really wanted to pursue it in as few as
five years. And she's now coming back to testify against her husband, which is altered of a sort of Dasatian shark, you know, insane asylum play that the government is putting on for the public. Because the prosecutor says to the jury and to the gathered in the courtroom that please remember that miss Almalka is not on trial here. She is a witness for the prosecution. In fact, they are both guilty of first degree murder, but she is a
prosecution witness who has been given immunion. So that kind of trial starts and then for the next four.
Months, about twenty one days.
Of which are taken up with Rosen cross examining a woman who has nothing to fear from the results of the cross examination, bringing about the most amazing descriptions, revelations and stuff that you would ever hear in a courtroom anywhere in the world. Stunning admissions, but they have no weight, they have no meaning, they have no consequence because she's
already been dealt with. So at the end of this and I mean, really, if people are that interested in the dynamics of this, they really have to read the books, which have the most comprehensive and complicated, but I think readable descriptions of everything that goes on in everything that's said.
But at the end of the trial, as the trial is concluding in the summer of nineteen ninety five No J. Simpson trials still on, the Bernardo trials concluding on Labor Day weekends nineteen ninety five, the prosecutor, the chief prosecutor says to the jury end of the court, that doesn't matter what Carla Homonka said. It's irrelevant to the conviction
of Paul Bernardo. Now thing she has said matters, we don't care because it's not relevant to the conviction of Paul Bernardo in law, He's correct, and in fact that's what happened. Bernardo was convicted, Carla went back to jail, and now it's the tenth Today, this year is tenth anniversary of her release from prison, absolutely free and clear. Yes, what do you say.
Let's talk about because we really haven't talked about this specifically. You had these one hundred over one hundred criminal charges, accusations of looking at releasing sensitive court documents, information that was not allowed, breaking the publication bands. Again, I don't want to get you to defend yourself, but what did you see? I mean, the court listened to the tapes but didn't see the videotapes. What did you see? What was so dangerous? On what you saw or what you
did or what you released? Tell us about that.
Yeah, nothing I saw released was very dangerous. I mean the idea that I saw or released or did anything that was dangerous or against the public good is absurd. But people are very gullible. So all you have to do is be accused of such things. And your neighbors is because I've even the police adored that, let alone swarm their house and arrest you at gunpoint with ten swat team people. Any government in a democratic society would behave that way over alleged publication band breaches or court
order breaches is insane. It doesn't happen in my case what they alleged, which was I had seen. When that matter came up in one of my trials, one of my two trials, the press reacted the fact that the Crown admitted like one hundred and sixty two people who had actually seen these restricted videotapes. And if the prosecuting office admits that the Attorney general were I'm looking for common word that's common do in the United States here.
If the chief prosecutor admits that, how many people actually must have seen them? If one hundred and sixty two people have seen tapes that are allegedly restricted, how many possible? There's probably five hundred who have seen them. Now, the point is I actually didn't see these particular tapes because there was only about an hour and fifteen minutes of them, and they were very specific to a certain format videotape
associated with this trial. So again, the government in this case and the police spent tens of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of man hours trying to create a subterfuge around what they were doing.
That was almost virtually unconscionable, and.
I was just another subtrifuge, just another distraction. The point being in alost ten years of prosecution, being arrested twice and put it on trial for years, two three years at a time, millions and millions of dollars spent on prosecuting on over one hundred charts of reaching publication bans and court orders. I ended up pleading guilty.
To one count a misdemeanor, which was like, let's do it your website, only not the books, and only because they had broken me victually. I mean, I would have kept fighting, but I didn't have any money left. I didn't have any property left. I didn't have anything left. You know, I was in debt half a million dollars. So when the.
Government came on and said, never mind all these hundred criminal charges, never buying this lawsuit as an enemy of the state, just take a plea to one misdemeanor count van reach to do with your website. Only well website that actually had that didn't exist and had never existed. It was up on an inaccessible server because we were looking at how to do maybe, how to do this? They came to us to take a plea to one misdemeanor. And because only because I not only had no money left,
I was half a million dollars in debt. I ultimately said, Okay, my lawyers advised me Edward grief practice law in North America and sterow, he's f lee bay. He's of that
ill side and keep fighting. It's entirely you. But let's think if you want to spend the rest of your life doing this, or you want to just take a small insignificant hit that's not even the equivalent of a left traffic violation like legal lefture, so penalty to do with my You know, you got to look at a situation like this and say to yourself, how in God's name do these books keep setting all these years? How come that don't you ever sued the best for libel
or misrepresentation or slander or anything. How Come the entire government of his country came against him on criminal charges?
How come?
You know, it doesn't make any sense, and it didn't make any sense, But they do what they do because that's what they do. And what they did to me was only a minor glitch compared to the more yes and nonsense they perpetrated. With the case of Paul Bernardo Macarla Homonka, let me.
Ask this question, and maybe you've been asked this before, but do you really think this is about you had this incredible access to doctor? Aren't He gave you a couple satchels of everything, access to everything, which I thought was incredible and also very well unusual. Where you had the diaries, you had the information from the psychiatric tests, you had all of that information that he gave you. He didn't have to give it to He respected you, so he gave it to you, right, I don't know.
And with that, yeah, he also bded all kinds of other essential material that almost would never be gotten in terms of the backgrounds of his patient. How you know all her school record, all ver medical records, everything to do with her. Very usual.
Now, with that information and all the other access that you had and your persistence in this and again we have books too, books over six hundred pages, so it's cram with information. Is this really? Bottom line? Are they mad because you told the truth? Are they mad that you expose this? Most it's beyond controversial. This travesty of justice. Are they and all the all the subsequent dealings and all the explanations, are they essentially mad about this?
I don't think they're had anymore because they're all either dead or retired. Well, I mean at the time, I mean, people don't think about these things. The passage of time is inexorable and it's very GENTI time, I think it was there are a couple very potful men who I had invented one way or the other, and there were there agendas at work. It's very rare phrase that families and victims have a rapacious legal representation that really it's a legal but more public relations like less than Mahafi
family had with a guy named Tim Danson. Every time this case got into the press, money would flow into Dance in office for what was it called, I think towards the end the Integrity Fund for the French and Mohafe family. Nothing ever. I mean, it's a sad, sad thing to say. But the person who took the most advantage of those people, the most advantage on a large not more advantage than the people who've killed their daughter.
But afterwards, the person and people who took the most advantage of them are the lawyer that represented them and the government used them as how politicians they're so lived, they're so fat to hide behind the easiest issues, and in this case the skirts of mothers of dead gris. It's so easy to be there, and they do. And at the time I think that all these forces were in play and I was just a big target and made mistake. Listen, not perfect. I made mistakes in a
sense on number of occasions. It was just a large sitting target and they were there and they took advantage of it. I don't think it's issues of freedom of speech. I think that the issues that caught me the date of Britain pain that versus Husan had to do with personalities an individual. It wasn't business, it was personal, if you know what I mean, right. I think it's certain individuals saw opportunities or had taken umbrage, was saying I had or whatever. It's impossible to see it in larger
societal terms because they're not there. I mean, they're just so it has to be personal. And you know, in case, one of the senior who was involved the filmmaking to do with Carla Hamalka was ended up as the assistant Deputy Minister of the Attorney General. I happened to mention in my summary and Invisible Darkness that he had been having an affair with his second here while he was managing the Hamalka business down in Niagara Falls, and that he left his wife and three children and married her.
And it was only in the back end of the book, and where you summarize traditional crime what became of all the players in the case. If you write a good book, a good crime book, you've got a lot of very prominent players and characters, and you've developed them, and in the end, out of a proper form you summarize what's becoming. You know, they left, have they died, what new job
have they taken, What's happened to them? Et cetera, et cetera. Well, in this case, mister Siegel happened to be the man who was responsible for order a police investigations at the very moment that, in other words, he hadn't left the Ministry of the Attorney General or the Office of the Attorney General, at the very moment that the first issue were called for by Tim Danson, the lawyer for the
Families of the Office and frenches. It was dancing that called for me to be arrested and investigate, and mister Siegel was sitting in the bird seat where he had the power to order arrest. I suspect that another man would have ignored it.
I know when we last spoke, because I again I think the root of the problem is and again we won't go back into it. But you said, you know, the lawyer's just doing their jobs. So that's their job. But it's clearly Tim Danson has taken his job and his responsibility to you know, irresponsible levels and unconscionable levels. I was always disgusted by his behavior, and I'm even more disgusted by what you had said and that I didn't know about Tim dance and interfering and trying to
get you arrested. I know he tried to ruin your journalistic career. I mean that was obvious by the press conferences. Did on behalf of the families and this irresponsible. But what I wanted to say too, is that he wasn't just doing his job. There was people in this story that weren't just doing their job.
I don't think the explanation that I was just doing my job is a justification for anything. I think anybody who has read anything about German history and World War two would easily accept the idea that just doing the job was a viable excuse. But I'm similar to that and your right to call it out, I mean, I use it as a euphemism as far as I know.
I can't, at least when I was paying attention to this of Tim Dance and they're actually wanted in court, when he was representing the family, every motion that he'd brought in front of court was turned back. When he went to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal, the Supreme Court appeal something that a lower court had said is unappealable. It's not a matter for the courts. It's a matter for parliament. It's a matter for lobbys. If you want the last change, we'll go and stop wasting
your client's money and lobby the government. When he ignored that advice and was the Supreme Court, and allegedly, I mean he said publicly it was in the newspapers stuff like that, that it required eight hundred million dollars for him to mount a Supreme Court challenge. When he mounted that challenge, the Supreme Court wouldn't.
Even hear him.
They would listen to his argument that you said it's hot for court. He understands how supreme courts work. It's a pretty dumny thing. If you're going to bring something, Try to bring something Supreme Court and they won't even let you argue in front of them. Why they should listen to it? They can or we don't want to hear anything from you of this. No, Well, but people
don't follow this stuff at all. There aren't many people that follow Supreme Court rulings or pay much attention that lawyers are doing or who's doing what to whom, And in the end a lot of people that are headly by it one way or the other, because actually it's one of those areas of life you should pay a little more in inche to than most people do. You're absolutely right. I mean, I'm as guilty as the next man of using that uprom and they were just doing
their jobs. I always say it tongue in cheap, but that's not always evident to somebody.
Listening right with this as well. I think it's a commentary and at least this is what I have seen in these few years that I've been covering mostly American true crime writers. It is a I think, a truly unique situation, the true crime book phenomena as a genre in America when you look in comparison to Australia has a strong true crime market and fascinatingly bizarre crimes, and
so does England. But Canada seems to not have that market, or at least what I see and I'm going to get you the weigh in is that based on a bunch of factors, the reluctance from the newspapers to sort of play up but rather play down some of these things, these cases, the important case depict in case Bernardo Amalka,
other important murder trials. Do you really do you see a difference that I see in the public's acceptance of these cases and their interest in following those cases and learning about those cases and being up on those cases. You see a difference, a vast difference, or any difference at all between the seemingly the two societies and the response to serious, incredible crime like these evidence by Paul Bernardo and Carlo Milca.
That's a very interesting question and a complex question, and superficially you could say that Americans seem to have a really overwhelming superficially purient interests. In other words, they love to consume all sorts of true crime almost the way they consume off or. In other words, they don't absorb it in any meaningful way, but it probably has an
effect on their heartbeat, their system, the caffeine would. Canadians seemed to want to deny that anything bad ever happens, or organized to make it look like law and order prevail. So therefore the presentation nor the way it evolves is there. But I think some of the strangest crimes committed on the planet have been committed by Canadians. I mean, no of a character like Olson and what he did and how the authorities dealt with him, i e. Buying out
you know, he held them where the victims were. They give a thousand dollars each free victim to his and child. I mean, how Canadian is that? And besides that, Olsen not only was a peculiar criminal, but he was also a peculiar and irrepressible maniac inmate. There has been no one crime like the Bernardo Harmonica crime in history, certainly not since they did it. There is a kick in
England that was almost coincidence. In time, there's Fred and Rose West case, right, but it is so bizarre and so out there that it's not comparable for instan if you look at class structure and a number of other issues age class fashionness. I mean, there's really no relation
to that. As far as I can tell that the Rose in West case and the Moors, there's three cases or four cases that have any similarity to the Bernardo case, and nothing like it has happened since it's so bizarre, and Canadians also produced of the most despicable, disgusting crimes like that magnatic guy in Montreal who cut up a perfectly innocent Chinese student sent his ball hearts to the
conservative and liberal offices. What the fuck's had about? You know, I haven't seen anything like that out of the United State.
I totally agree with you. In fact, what I had said and stated publicly is that if you look at the case of the photographer in Edmonton that lured somebody on plenty of fish and then came up with a serial killer sort of checkbook, that he was a script that he was going by to lure somebody, and as he was a woman and then murder and videotape, and then the case I was involved with Sidney teerhuse every graphic, gory, disgusting detail he wanted the world to know, and the
murder spectacle that he laid out for authorities with Susan Sarandon's jewelry nearby. And it seemed like after that case, Magnauta was influenced by Colonel Williams and yes Paul Bernardo and picked in, but wanted to outdo in one murder everyone else by being over the top, by videotape, being cannibalizing and defiling this body, sending it to government agencies.
Of course, there's nothing like that in America or the world, because I think Canadians are competing with Americans very much like we would in entertainment, comedians, artists.
And addition, there's a certain argument to be made on its bay for that sort of thing. It's it's always struck me. It's very odd how extreme certain cases are in Canada pried to international. I mean, it's just a matter of degree. It's almost impossible to jurass afferent rate rooted crime that's going on in the gotten crime that's
going on today. I mean I used to say when people would become you know, there was so much emotion at the time I was writing about the art homeof the case that even you know, for instance, Margaret at even question my son and even when she was writing Alias Grace, why doesn't he just stop this? Since they're execute again to this extent, why doesn't he, you know,
just not do this. You know, Canadians they don't seem to have any perspective on anything ex polite literature, and it uses but one of the men I ideally admire and have no one over the years, off and on or go and said, I don't have a secret chart at me that the heart exists or any of the matter. I'm just, honestly, always just been a guy trying to write a good book and write about something thankful.
And look into the place.
The trouble is, when you go trying to do that, you find yourself stuck over the abits, as I have done so.
Absolutely yeah, and its stricably involved in something that again by definition, uh never leaves you. It stays with you. And very much he wrote these books many years ago. The factor seems to go away. I've got interviewed a lot of authors that seems I can't remember the books, but I'm pretty sure you won't forget this one. So no, no,
in this case at all, so I'm confident. Anyway, I want to thank you very much Stephen for coming on and talking about Invisible Darkness and your involvement in this incredible case. And we just touched on it, and I'm sure readers will be motivated to go into these books and.
Pleased to do it, you know, after you know, a month or two of bread, to be happy to talk to you again if you had more stuff to get.
Absolutely, this is this story is on so many levels, demonstrates so much about killers themselves and their motivation. And not only we have a spectacular killer in Paul Bernardo, but then we have a spectacular killer couple with Carla Hamlca and incredible that she's roaming around free and easy in Montreal with a couple of children and happily married. Yeah.
So this this is the story that demonstrates so much about killers, but also demonstrates so much about the motivations of jurisdictions and police and government agencies and everybody with their needs. And again it opens up an incredible door for incredible discussion about so many different things in one book, in two books, covering so much history, and that it's horrifying and true regardless is very essential and important history.
I want to thank you very much Stephen for coming on and talking about your incredible book and Invisible Darkness.
Thanks for having me.
You have a great night.
Good night.
Between all the decorating, shopping and get togethers, finding the time to cook dinner during the holiday season can be difficult. HelloFresh makes it easy by delivering fresh ingredients, pre measured to the right amounts, straight to your door. With HelloFresh, you can cook delicious, time saving meals without having to wait in line at the grocery store, and you actually
have time to enjoy them with your loved ones. Get started at Hello Fresh and for a special holiday treat, use code Holidays sixteen to get up to sixteen free meals. That's code Holidays sixteen at HelloFresh dot caugh this thing, Dad.
You gotta get a better laptop.
No, that's how they get you, Dad.
You get one with good battery. It takes a year to charge, great performance, but it weighs a ton. Get an Intel evil laptop like mine.
It has everything, really one am I giving up just that outdated laptop?
Okay, I'm sold.
Incredible performance, connectivity, and battery life. Want a laptop that has it all. That's Intel EVO Laptops.
Evolved details at intel dot com.
Slash Evo results may vary
