DRIFTING INTO DARKNESS-Mark I. Pinsky - podcast episode cover

DRIFTING INTO DARKNESS-Mark I. Pinsky

May 30, 20221 hr 4 minEp. 663
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Two grisly murders—a brutal double parricide—a suicide, and a fourth death under suspicious circumstances. Drifting Into Darkness is a tangled tale of family dysfunction, fatal attraction, and greed, a saga that wends its way from the elegant Southern mansions of Montgomery, Alabama, to the New Age salons of Boulder, Colorado, to rural, windswept Wyoming.
On Thanksgiving weekend in 2004, philanthropists Charlotte and Brent Springford Sr.―a wealthy, socially prominent Montgomery couple―were brutally beaten to death with an ax handle, echoing the infamous case of Lizzie Borden. Suspicion quickly fell on the Springfords' gifted but troubled son Brent Jr., who would be tried and sentenced to life without parole. But a mystery remained: Who was the mysterious, elusive woman who claimed to be a Native American shaman that investigators believed manipulated Brent into this murder?
Journalists solving murders is a time-tested trope in movies, mysteries, and on television. But cops and cop reporters know that rarely happens in real life. Except when it does. Veteran crime reporter Mark I. Pinsky, who covered the sensational cases of serial killer Ted Bundy and Green Beret Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald, broke the cardinal rule of journalism by involving himself in the story. Pinsky’s extensive research prompted investigators to invite him to join their dogged pursuit of justice. His access to unique and heart-breaking behind-the-scenes material enables him to take readers with him into the troubled, tortured minds of the case's main players. DRIFTING INTO DARKNESS: Murders, Madness, Suicide and a Death "Under Suspicious Circumstances"-Mark I. Pinsky Follow and comment on Facebook-TRUE MURDER: The Most Shocking Killers in True Crime History   https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064697978510Check out TRUE MURDER PODCAST @ truemurderpodcast.com

Transcript

Speaker 1

Judy was boring.

Speaker 2

Hello.

Speaker 1

Then Judy discovered Chumbucasino dot com.

Speaker 3

It's my little escape.

Speaker 1

Now Judy's the life of the party.

Speaker 3

Oh baby, mama is bringing home the bacon.

Speaker 1

WHOA, take it easy, Judy. Jump the chumba life. That's for everybody. So go to chumpacasino dot com and play over one hundred casino style games. Join today and play for free for your chance to redeem some serious prices. Jump chumpacasino dot com. Nobrig's necessary Weight, We're go hit at my mom eight Team lost terms and condition to play se website for details.

Speaker 4

Hello, It is Ryan and I was on a flight the other day playing one of my favorite social spin slot games on chumpacasino dot com. I looked over at the person sitting next to me, and you know what they were doing. They were also playing Chumpa Casino. Coincidence, I think not everybody's loving having fun with it. Chumpa Casino's home to the hundreds at casino style games. You can play for free anytime, anywhere, even at thirty thousand feet.

So sign up now at chumbuck Casino dot com to claim you're free.

Speaker 1

Welcome bonus.

Speaker 4

That's Chumbuck Casino dot Com and Live the Chumba Lite noperg Necessary d repod wherever if I lost in terms of it since eighty plus.

Speaker 5

You are now listening to True Murder the most shocking killers in true crime history and the authors that have written about them Gasey Bundy, Dahmer, The Nightstalker VTK every week another fascinating author talking about the most shocking and infamous killers in true crime history. True Murder with your host, journalist and author Dan Zufanski, Good Evening.

Speaker 3

Two grisly murders, a brutal double parricide, a suicide, and the fourth death under suspicious circumstances. Drifting into Darkness is a tangled tale of family dysfunction, fatal attraction, and greed, a saga that wends its way from the elegant southern mansions of Montgomery, Alabama, to the New Age salons of Boulder, Colorado,

to rural windswept Wyoming. On Thanksgiving weekend in two thousand and four, philanthroists Charlotte and Brent Springford Senior, a wealthy, socially prominent Montgomery couple, were brutally beaten to death with an axe handle echoing the infamous case of Lizzie Borden. Suspicion quickly fell on the Springford's gifted but troubled son, Brent Junior, who would be tried and sentenced to life

without parole. But a mystery remained. Who was the mysterious, elusive woman who claimed to be a Native American shaman that investigators believe manipulated Brent into this murder. Journalists solving murders as a time tested trope in movies, mysteries, and on television, but cops and cop reporters know that rarely

happens in real life, except when it does. Veteran crime reporter mark I Pinsky, who covered the sensational cases of serial killer Ted Bundy and Green Beret doctor Jeffrey MacDonald, broke the cardinal rule of journalism by involving himself in the story. Pinsky's extensive research prompted investigators to invite him

to join their dogged pursuit of justice. His access to unique and heartbreaking behind the scenes material enables him to take readers with him into the troubled, tortured minds of the case's main players. The book that we're featuring this evening is drifting into darkness murders, madness, suicide, and a death under suspicious circumstances with my special guest, journalist and author mark I Pinsky. Welcome to the program, and thank you very much for this interview. Mark I Pinsky, Dan,

thank you very much for inviting me. I'm glad to be here. Thank you so much. This is an incredible tale, and we talked about your incredible access makes this true crime essential reading. Let's get right to the Springfords in this garden district as you write of Montgomery, Alabama, and you take us immediately to Thanksgiving two thousand and four. November twenty sixth and a subcontractor, Michael Shelton and his

workers pull up to this address, this affluent home. What to Sheldon and his crew discover they have had access to this home and they've been working and they know the family.

Speaker 4

Well.

Speaker 3

Tell us what happens what they find.

Speaker 6

Well, when they pull up, they were getting ready to complete some of the renovations that were happening in the house. And first they were somewhat concerned because there were some unlocked doors and they the key that they had for

the actual house was not working. It appeared that a bolt had been thrown from inside, so they went through the garage and found an entrance in there, and they walked into the kitchen area where they were doing some tiling work, and they shouted to let people know that they were there, let Brent and Charlotte know that they were there. They got no answer. They were able to reach through a window pane which was removable, un throw

the bolt, and walk into the kitchen again. They shouted that they were here, just that people wouldn't be surprised. They weren't sure whether the Springsburghs would be at home or not, but as they walked through the first floor

of the house, they noticed things were in disarray. They first noticed that when they went through the garage that Brent Senior's office appeared to be somewhat in disarray, and he was known as a very neat person, so they were somewhat concerned, but it was a holiday weekends, so they didn't get too concerned. They went into the kitchen, saw no one and walked through the first floor and

saw papers strewn throughout the place. There was some foreboding because there were still no answer when they called upstairs to let them know they were there, and so with that sense of foreboding, the lead contractor walked up the backstairs and when he reached the landing, he stopped suddenly because the carpet at the top of the stairs was saturated with blood, and not just a little blood, a lot of blood, and he knew something very wrong had happened.

He went back down the stairs and told his workers not to go upstairs. He then called Brent Senior on the cell phone he had his number because the contractor also worked for Brent Senior for a time at their soft drink bottling company. There was no answer, the more concern When there was no answer, the contractor then called the Montgomery Police Department and said they thought something very

wrong had happened. At first they thought maybe it was a burglary, an armed robbery, a home invasion robbery that'd gone wrong, but there were nothing else that they could see, and so the police said, leave the premises, wait out front.

We'll get there as soon as we can. And it was a holiday weekend, so there were some people who were actually officers detectives who were at home, and so they were called in and it took about thirty or forty minutes for the police to arrive, both uniforms and detectives. They went in. They went through through the kitchen door, they went upstairs, they saw the huge area of blood. They knew something terrible was wrong, and so they began They called back to the precinct and said, we need

some homicide detectives. We think that there's a murder of some sort. Their first thought was it was a murder suicide. It might have been the simplest explanation for the physical evidence that they first saw. In the next hour or so, they then ventured along the hallway in the second floor, and the first thing they saw was the body of Brent Springford Senior. He had been beaten to death. They

didn't know with what at the time. It later turned out to be a pickaxe handle, but also his throat was cut almost to the point of decapitation, and he

was surrounded by blood in this area. They've ventured further down the hall to the master bedroom, where they found the body of Charlotte Sprinford would also have been beaten to death, who also was stabbed multiple times, including in the throat, and in this case, however, they were defensive wounds on her arms that they could recognize right away. Unlike Brent, there were no defensive wounds on him. He

apparently was set upon in a furious attack. But this time Charlotte Springford either saw something happening or knew something was happening, and she tried to defend herself. There was physical evidence that after she was beaten to the ground and stabbed, she still tried to drag herself in the direction of the telephone, but she didn't make it.

Speaker 3

Investigators find out that there's a daughter, Robin, and a son, Brent Junior, and also that the Jaguarar is missing. So how do investigators proceed with this investigation.

Speaker 6

Well, they first tried to reach Robin and also Charlotte's half sister, Lois Trust who lived in Birmingham where they

had spent the Thanksgiving dinner. And at the same time they were making these calls, neighbors seeing the police vehicles and then the yellow tape that went up, began congregating on the lawn and on the front in the street in front of them, and so other detectives began to chat with the neighbors to see if they had any leads, and among them were some close friends of the Springfords who said, take a close look at their son, Brent Junior.

He's been estranged from the family living out in Colorado. So that went into the factors of the initial discussions, and they, as the investigators called family members. The family members also pointed toward Brent Junior. But the problem for the police is that as far as they knew, Brent was two thousand miles away in the area of Boulder, Colorado, so they began making phone calls. They were also concerned.

The family was concerned that Brent Junior not only had killed those his parents, but he might have in mind to kill his sister and other family members. So the family members on their own went into hiding in case that Brent Junior was still around and might be after them. So the police immediately to protect live They sent squad cars to protect Lois Trust's house and other places in thought that maybe he would come there, that it was Brent Junior and that he would come there. The family

owned the Lake House. They went out to the Lake House, but at the same time they were making calls out to Colorado, where they knew that Brent had a home, and they were asking local sheriff's deputies to go out and see if he was there, and so all this was happening, there was a lot of I won't say confusion, but these were the victims were really wealthy, prominent people, so a lot was at stake for the police department to This is a horrible thing, you know, people in

a neighborhood like the Garden District being murdered in their homes at a very high screw up.

Speaker 3

So police speak to Robin and what did they find out from Robin concerning the brother Brent Jr. And just the dynamics of the family, especially at Thanksgiving.

Speaker 6

Well, they found out that Robin and her husband Greg, Charlotte and Brent Senior had had a Thanksgiving dinner at the home of Charlotte's half sister, Lois Trusts in Birmingham, and the family was happy to gather together because Lois Trust's daughter had just gotten married, so there were two newly read couples and was very happy. But there was in a sense an empty chair at the Thanksgiving table, and that chair would have been for Brent Junior, but

he was estranged from the family. So the estrangement really when speaking to the people who are around the table. That estrangement at least sort of hung over the whole event. So Robin again was convinced that only one person could have done this. It wasn't a random act, it wasn't a home invasion, it was it was her. It was

her brother who did it. She'd know how it happened or where it happened, but she was convinced that it was her brother who was responsible, and also Robin was also concerned, to concern she gave to the police that initially Robin and Greg were supposed to come back to the Springford's home in Montgomery with her parents to go off together, but at the last minute, Robin and her husband decided not to go with him, and Robin was very much concerned that if she had, if she and

her husband had gone back with her parents, that she and her husband would have been murdered as well.

Speaker 3

So what do investigators do to be able to speak to Caroline Scout.

Speaker 6

Well, they called Brent Junior's partner, caregiver and as it turns out wife in Colorado who's living in the house that the Springfords had given them, and wanted to know where Brent Junior was and at first, this woman's name is Caroline Scout, she said, oh, he's around here, somewhere, and they asked how long she had seen him.

Speaker 1

Was she sure?

Speaker 6

She said, oh, yes, he's been here all week. He called in sick at work on Wednesday night, the Wednesday before the Thursday of Thanksgiving, and he's been around here all week. So the police, you know, are used to people telling the truth or not telling the truth, and they asked the local sheriff's department in Colorado to go out and check out the place, the house, to see if he was actually there. Two deputies went out there, they looked around, they saw a car that was registered

to Brent, but they couldn't find Brent. And they questioned Caroline Scouts two three adult children, two adults in one adolescent who were living in the house, and they all reaffirmed that, in fact, Brent had been there all week. So the police were first puzzled. And then another young man who was living at the house a border actually took one of the police aside and said, you should call me at my work. I'll be able to speak

more freely. And when they did that, he said, I haven't seen Brent for a week, and so police became concerned. They still weren't ready to make a move. The Montgomery police were not ready to get on a plane quite yet until the jaguar was discovered in outside of Tulsa, Oklahoma, which kind of began to connect the docks for the

investigators in Montgomery. There was the missing jaguar that had been in the garage in Montgomery, and after the murder, it shows up in Tulsa, Oklahoma, which is pretty much two thirds the way back to Colorado. They thought they were kind of closing in.

Speaker 1

On their suspect.

Speaker 3

Now, what do investigators find about the dynamics of Brent Junior, his family life, Brent Senior, this wealthy businessman, and mother Charlotte, What was their personalities and how they contributed to this dynamic.

Speaker 6

Well, the Springfords, Brent Senior and Charlotte were really well beloved in Montgomery. They were philanthropists. They had made lot of money, but they weren't, you know, gravy, selfish people. They tried to share their wealth in many ways, even

when they traveled. They were very progressive. Now this is two thousand and four, but earlier Montgomery can be a very conservative place and was a very conservative place between regarding racial equality, but both Brent Senior and Charlotte were known as being very progressive people on race, very open to various people in town. When the Southern Poverty Law Center located in Montgomery, a lot of the establishment people kind of shunned them, but Brent and Charlotte did not.

They made them welcome, and so they were beloved for their gifts. They were beloved for their civic involvement. And the great tragedy, as their close friends knew, was a long term estrangement from their oldest son, Brent Junior, and they had done everything their friends knew to support him as he was growing up. He was not a spoiled kid. He was an outruistic kid. He took in strays in terms of newcomers to his school, He invited people to

they had parties at the home. But when he went away to school, he went to Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee. Very good school, but in those first couple of years he became gradually alienated from his parents. And his parents didn't cut him off. They didn't. He was what's known in this country, and it was tough love. They tried to understand what was happening to him. They were very sympathetic. They offered counseling. He was always welcome back home, even

when he became more and more alienated to them. When he decided to drop out of Vanderbilt after his second year, where he was a very good student, he went on projects in Latin America to help people. His professors loved him, but he became interested in New Age beliefs, but also a serious study of Eastern religions, Buddhism and Hinduism, and

his parents weren't sure what the source of this alienation was. Sociologically, at least in North America, when young men reached their early twenties, they're sometimes vulnerable to incipient mental illness, particularly bipolar, and Brent Junior's parents weren't sure if that's what it was, because there was a family history of bipolar disorder in Charlotte's family, and they were petrified that that's what was happening to them. But they did everything they could to

support him. He wanted to drop out of Vanderbilt for the second year. They didn't like it, but they accepted it. He wanted to study Buddhism and Hinduism in retreats around the country and in Mexico, and they supported him in that so they basically did everything they could. But as time passed, he began, as the title of the book says, he began to drift into darkness, and the alienation was greater and greater when he would come back for family visits,

sometimes sometimes for big family occasions. The spring Shirt had a black tie dinner at Christmas every year for more than one hundred people at their home, and he showed up one year in a monk's row with his head shaves, and his parents were, of course mortified, but they were saying their explanation was Brent's just trying to find himself.

Speaker 3

When did Brent meet Caroline Scout and under what circumstances?

Speaker 6

Well, Brent spent about two years with a serious study of Buddhism and Hinduism, going from a retreat to retreat in Mexico and across the US. He ended up in Boulder, Colorado, where he decided he would study Buddhism formally at Naropa University in Boulder. His parents were not so thrilled with the idea, but they thought, well, he'll be back in school. That'll be good for us, and so they supported that.

But you know, all for all of Brent's adult life he was searching for enlightenment through New Age seeking, through Buddhism and Hinduism, but in the end it just got darker and darker. He really wanted to find a guru, a spiritual god, and he went to visit the home of his roommate. His roommate at Nouopa's parents lived in Boulder.

They had a kind of an intellectual salon, a New Age salon, at their home, and he went there one day and he crossed paths with a woman named Caroline Scouts who claimed to be a Native American shaman, and the instant he saw her, he was struck. And he got down on his knees and touched his head to the floor three times and said, I've found my spiritual guide. And that was a faithful meeting for Brent. He thought this search that he'd been on for several years was

finally satisfied. He found someone who he could follow and learn about and study. He was still at Naropa, so as he was getting to know her, taking some breathing.

Speaker 1

Classes with her.

Speaker 6

That she gave in Boulder. He wrote a paper about her for Naropa and her history, based of course, only on what she told him, and he became closer and closer to her. Her and I think at that time she sensed in him what we call a mark, a vulnerable person from whom she could extract money.

Speaker 3

Now they have a relationship, and he wants to tell us parents about this person. Their parents are interested in meeting this person that they believe can be a caretaker. Maybe you can explain to us that meeting and what they get from the meeting this woman, and what they think her interest is regarding their son.

Speaker 6

At first, they were relieved that he had found someone who could look after him, someone whose advice he was likely to take, because, as they were concerned with his mental health as well, they thought if he was with a person who would be a caretaker who he would listen to, they could have sense use her to steer him towards psychiatric care. They weren't sure, and also Charlotte handedly admitted if he had a caretaker in Bolder, he was less likely to come home to Montgomery and embarrass

them again with his state of mind. So they felt this was a good idea. But they again, they were very caring parents, very careful parents, and so they flew out to Boulder to meet this woman, and they were initially impressed with her. They felt she was a very spiritual person. Many people who met her felt she was a very spiritual person. And they left fairly confident that

this was going to be a good arrangement. And so to cement that, they began sending Caroline Scout money, ostensibly to take care of Brent, but it was really more money than she would have needed, and so that relationship was sort of christened and approved of by Brent's parents. They were hopeful, they weren't sure, but they were hopeful that this might bring him back to them in some way through her, And in fact, she did begin to

get him to see a series of psychiatrists. He was uncertain of it himself, but because she said he should do it, he began to do it.

Speaker 3

Now, you talk about this and what is the diagnosis from these various psychiatrists.

Speaker 6

Very early on, the psychiatrist's diagnoses were sort of reinforced from one to another for the most part, which is early stages of bipolar disorder. This was troubling to Brent Junior's mother, because she knew that her family, for three

generations at least, had been plagued with bipolar disorder. They were in her family suicides, institutionalizing alcoholism, various things which she had decided not to tell her son about for fear that he would see that as something that couldn't be avoided for him, and so she didn't want it to be an inevitable problem that he should worry about, among the other things that he had in his life

to worry about. So she recognized that that was probably the case, and she did what psychiatrists don't really like to do. She began corresponding with his psychiatrists. Most of them, because of the ethics, would not respond to her because he was not a minor, so she had no standing

to his psychiatric care. But she was pretty clear that the psychiatrists were onto something, and they prescribed medication, and, as often happens with bipolar disorder, the medication, once they get the sort of mix or the cocktail right, results in improvement. But sometimes the improvement the patient says, well, I'm feeling fine, I don't need the drugs anymore. So then they stopped taking the drugs, and the psychle repeats.

Speaker 3

Now you talk about that there was a secret that these two, Brent Junior and Caroline had that they kept from the parents, and the parents, being supportive and wealthy, decided to buy a home and keep it in their own name, but buy a home so that he could have somewhere to live and support this caregiver. But in reality, what was the living arrangements at that time.

Speaker 6

It was very strange. Before they bought the house. While while Brent Junior was still in Boulder, when there was a summer break at Naroka, he told his parents he wanted to go up to Wyoming where Caroline Scout had a small ranch and work on her ranch, be a caretaker and learning learn about Native American culture, which they agreed to, and that took place through the summer, and then he decided he was going to stay there, that

he wouldn't go back to school. He began working at various jobs now up there, he did see a psychiatrist, but his mother felt that a psychiatrist in South Dakota was not the kind of psychiatrist that she he needed, so she wanted to get them back to Boulder. But what she didn't know is that that summer, Caroline Scout drove Brent Junior across the border into South Dakota to a town historic count called Deadwood, and they were secretly married. Brent later said he didn't know why she wanted to

get married. It was her idea, not his. He didn't realize it, but he was twenty What he knew he was twenty four. But what he didn't realize is that she was forty eight, twice his age. And she said, we want to keep this a secret, and so it was a secret. And by that time is that this was not a traditional marriage. They say there was no sexual relationship between Caroline and Brent Junior, and he was

apparently quite content with that. When he moved finally from Caroline's ranch in Wyoming to the house that his parents had purchased in Greeley, Colorado, he wasn't even allowed to sleep, not only in her bedroom, he was not allowed to

sleep in the house. He built a little living area in the garage, the adjoining garage, and he was not allowed to come into the house without permission from Caroline, and he needed to call her on her cell phone first to get permission to come into the house, which happened but very rarely, and to her children, Caroline denigrated him that he was basically a screw up, that he was crazy, and that her caretaking was just basically a paid indulgence for her.

Speaker 3

This continues for quite a while where the parents are supportive, hoping for the very best, thinking that she has his best interest in mind. But eventually, through a bunch of different circumstances, Charlotte, but especially Brent Senior, believe that there's something amiss and there eventually is a complaint because these numbers don't add up. The money that they're giving has not got any return on an investment, so they think that Caroline has They're suspicious of her as a result.

There is talk of withholding money as a result. What happens with the living arrangement at the house in Colorado And how is it that he has this kind of information that really paints his parents in a negative light despite their support of him.

Speaker 6

Well, there's an increasing flow over several years of money from the Springfields in Montgomery to Caroline as caretaker in Greeley, and the figures began to really mount uf And it begins with well, the house which is not in their name, but they bought the house. They did buy with titled

cars for Caroline and her adult children. They bought clothes, they paid community college tuition, a whole series of benefits that when the paper trail was finally tracked, it was somewhere between a million and a million and a half dollars.

There are various improvements on the property, and Brent Junior, who was not a gravvy spoiled kid growing up, began to make increasing demands on his parents, never in voice, usually in texts or facts, and the tone of his request, which soon shifted in demands, was very uncharacteristic of Brent Jr. He was basically beginning to treat his parents as an atm, as a cash machine, and they became suspicious naturally over time.

And they had talked amongst themselves as well as with their friends and neighbors and some psychiatrists about when to exercise what's called, as I mentioned before, tough love, when to say you need to do this, if you want me to do this, And the estrangement when they did that became really intense, until finally they decided they were going to cut both Caroline and Brent Junior off around the same time, Robin was supposed to get married in

the big fancy wedding in Alabama, and they decided that Brent had become too unstable to attend. So the Robin had personally invited her brother, her parents got her to disinvite him right around the time that they decided to cut off the money, and they did. He did not attend the wedding. They did cut off the money, and six weeks after the money was cut off, Brent got on a Brent Junior got on a bus from Boulder headed toward Montgomery.

Speaker 7

Wait, the Lucky land slots. You can get lucky just about anywhere.

Speaker 2

It's your captain speaking. We've got clear runway and the weather's five. But we're just going to circle up here a while and get lucky. No, no, nothing like that. It's just these cash prizes add up quick. So I suggest you sit back, keep your trade table up right, and start getting lucky.

Speaker 7

Play for free at Lucky landslipes dot com. Are you feeling lucky? No, we're just necessary void. We're prohibited by Law eighteen plus. Terms and conditions apply. See website for details.

Speaker 3

Let's use this as an opportunity mark to stop for a second to hear from our sponsor, which is neutrophil. Eighty million men and women in the US experience thinning hair, yet it's still not openly talked about, which can make going through it feel stressful and that just adds to the problem. Neutrifhole is the number one dermatologists recommended hair growth supplement clinically shown to improve your hair growth, thickness, and visible scalp coverage for men and women. Did you

know that there are multiple causes of thinning hair. Neutrifhol is the hair growth supplement that goes beyond genetics to target stress, hormones, nutrition, metabolism, aging, and lifestyle factors that may be impacting your hair. Thinning is different for men and women. Nutrifol has multiple unique formulas for men and women to provide exactly what they need based on their biology and age. Every formula is physician formulated using natural

medical grade ingredients for reliable results without compromises. In clinical studies, seventy two percent of men saw more scalp coverage and eighty six percent of women saw improved hair growth after six months. Neutrifil is also trusted and recommended by more than three thousand top doctors. You can grow thicker, healthier hair and support our show by going to neutrifal dot com and entering promo code shocking to say fifteen dollars

off your first month subscription. This is their best offer anywhere and it's only available to US customers for a limited time, plus free shipping on every order. Get fifteen dollars off at neutrifal dot com spelled nut rafol dot com promo code shocking. Now, investigators Mark have the evidence they need, have the background to explain how this all occurred, and they have their likely suspect. Tell us about the arrest and what happens afterwards.

Speaker 6

In this investigation, well, two detectives from Montgomery went out and joined the Sheriff's deputies out in the Greeley area. And as they pursued their initial investigation, it became clear and clear that Brent Junior's alibi for being in Colorado at the time of the murder was falling apart, and they could see that. And as they kept making visits to Caroline Scouts House, which is obviously the oldest Springfield's house, to interrogate members of the family and Brent. Things were

getting shakier and shakier. At that point, they were almost ready to make an arrest, but Brent Junior preempted them by checking himself into a local psychiatric institute, from which they could not get him. While they were waiting to find a way to get him from the institution, Surveillis takes was coming in from across from bus stations across the country. They were placing Brent Junior on the way to Montgomery and from Oklahoma where the jaguar was discovered,

back to Boulder. So they were building a case, but they were under great deal of pressure because the only physical evidence they found at the Springford's home in Montgomery where the murders took place, was one fingerprint from Brent on a banister, but it was not in blood, and there's no way to date the fingerprint in the house that he grew up in, So basically they had no

physical evidence to connect Brent Junior to the killing. So they were under great pressure back in Montgomery because the parents were such socially prominent people to come up with a solution quickly, and the only way they.

Speaker 1

Could do that was.

Speaker 6

They thought anyway was to go through Brent himself to get some sort of a confession. So they waited. They got a warrant for his arrest from Montgomery, a request for extradition from Alabama, and they went to the psychiatric institute. It was midnight. The people the psychiatacilly said they wouldn't release him unless the police showed up with a warrant for his arrest, which they did. It was about midnight. Brent had been sleepless, we don't know for how long.

He was also taking psychotropic drugs, some very powerful. Yet the institute released him to these police officers, and then something a little strange happened, or maybe more than a little strange happened. Instead of taking Brent right to the Boulder County jail he would have been booked, they took him to a small police station in Lewisville, Colorado, which was where the psychiatric institute was, and the two homicide detectives and two local sheriff deputies sat him down and

interrogated them. Now here's a young man, normally troubled psychiatric history, under the influence of psychotropic drugs, drugs pless and they begin to interrogate them. They read him as Miranda rights. But the question later emerged, you know, what was his frame of mind? Did he know what he was being asked? Did he know that he was entitled to a lawyer? Notwithstanding, the two Montgomery police officers who I spoke with later said, well, we knew we were on a little shaky ground, but

this was all we had. So he thought we'd go do this. That there's a problem with a confession. Later, we let the prosecutor deal with that. And so they interrogated him for four hours on tape, at which time he gave an account and admission of how and why he bludgeoned his parents, how and why he beat his parents to death, and so with that, they then took him to the Boulder County Jail and booked him into jail.

But the Boulder jail officials, one of the things they had to sign up a certification that he was not that he was mentally capable of the time, and they said he was. But it became obvious to the jail officials that he wasn't, because they called in some of their psychologists to talk to him, gave him several tests, including a Rorschach test, and then they had the presence of mind to bring in a local public defender to

look out for his rights. But at that time, by that point, you know, the horse was out of the barn as far as the confession goes, and then things were compounded. Brent, while in the jail, well before when he was in the psychiatric institute, he was calling TV stations around Montgomery, denying that he was involved, but calling sort of everybody he thought of, and making disparaging remarks about both the police in Montgomery and the governor of Alabama,

which would later do him no good. Later, when he was in the in the Boulder County jail, he wrote something else which amounted to a confession, which he gave to a jailer. He said, to give to his attorney, to his public defender, the jail person. Those things are privilege, you can't use them. But the jail attendant nonetheless made a copy of it and shared that with the police authorities. In that written document, he also Brent Junior also confessed

to the murder. Although he gave there were certain details about who said, what, what happened, The order of things, and what motivated him were somewhat different, but that later went to the police and that strengthened their hands in their accusations of Brent Junior's involvement in the murders.

Speaker 3

Through all of this, they do hear and they do assume that maybe this Caroline Scout does not have the best interests at heart with Brent Junior, but also that she may have had some involvement one way or another, either prompting him to do this or being more directly involved. And yet Brent, despite anything, is very very protective of

Caroline in this regard. And in fact, another thing that you point out was very, very very interesting and would lead police to be very suspicious is that because they were married, she was not would not be forced whatsoever to testify against her husband. And yet she gave crucial information, in incriminating information to police voluntarily, didn't she.

Speaker 6

She did, which was very curious and became curiouser and curiusers. Alice in Wonderland once said as to whose interest she had at the foremost she visited him, but she shared much of what he told her with investigators, which was very strange, and they weren't sure why. A part of his protection of her, one he would never implicate in

any way in the killing itself. But when when Caroline Scout gave you know, she basically lied to investigators initially about where he was, so that would leave her vulnerable to accessory after the fact, if not accessory as an accessory, and they let her come back with a lawyer and retract the lies that she had told investigators previously. And Brent Junior seemed fixated with the idea that she should not be in any way vulnerable to any kind of prosecution.

He was adamant about that, and he would remain adamant about that for years that followed.

Speaker 3

Now, this was a capital case, and so this was a different dynamic in terms of what their intention was as defense team, and their goal was to save his life, obviously, and so they only had a couple options. And so what they decide to do in terms of defense and how did that work out and lead us to this trial.

Speaker 6

Their first line of defense was to prove that he was mentally incompetent either to stand trial or to have

committed what the crime was. And in the US judicial system, in a case like this, the question of mental competence gets down to an issue of dueling shrinks, as we say, So the defense would hire psychiatrists to evaluate, knowing the history of these psychiatrists that they were amenable to finding someone incompetent, whereas the prosecutor would would go and recruit psychiatrists who were known to have a bias against finding incompetence.

So that was the first line of defense. That took several years, and they went back and forth and back and forth, and finally the defense lost that it became clear that although they knew that Brent Jr. Was crazy or getting crazier from their own dealings with him, and more difficult to defend, the ruling was that he was not incompetent to stand trial. And so there were then two lines of defense that were secondary. One was to get a change of venue from Montgomery, where the case

was huge news day after day. And the second line of that defense was to have the three now this time three confessions by Brent thrown out because he was not properly protected when he gave those gave those confessions. So the first two motions took a long time to adjudicate. The first one was the defense won a change of venue from Montgomery to Birmingham, which was about an hour away.

Now it was a great victory, not so much because he would have a better shot at a trial in Birmingham, But in order to move the trial from Montgomery to Birmingham, it would be an added expense to Montgomery, Montgomery County. It would cost an extra quarter of a million dollars that was not budgeted, and so pressure then was on the prosecutor, do you want to have to go to the county commission asked for another quarter of a million dollars.

Now that's not a yes or no proposition, but it factored into the decision of where the prosecutor wanted to deal away the death penalty. Once the death penalty went off the table, then the trial would probably remain in Montgomery with a pleading. The issue of the confessions, which was also critical, was not adjudicated, so they were sort of hanging out there. But the prosecution knew that if the judge threw out the three confessions, all they had

left was bus station surveillance tape. They had no physical connection, could put Brent in Montgomery in that house, and no other way to prove that Brent Junior committed these murders other than the fact that they could prove that he went from Boulder to Montgomery and then went from on the way back from Tulsa to Bolder, so that those are different factors that the prosecutor had to weigh in

whether to accept a plea. Another issue was the Springford family. Robin, the surviving daughter, and her husband Greg were thought to be really pressing hard for the death penalty. Now the prosecutor didn't need to get their permission, but by practice they consult. So these were all the factors that the prosecutor, Ellen Brooks, was weighing as to whether she would be amenable to a deal they would take the death penalty off the table, but would result in a guilty play.

In Alabama, the prosecutor is an elected position, so she always has to be careful about, you know, what this might mean to her politically, because she had asked for the death penalty before in other cases where the accused were people of color and poor, and it might not look good for her to take the death penalty off the table for a young man who was white and from a wealthy background.

Speaker 3

So tell us what happens at trial, What is the outcome?

Speaker 6

At trial, they had finally, they thought, convinced Brent Junior to accept the plea of life in prison without the possibility of parole, with the understanding that he would be

housed in a secure psychiatric prison unit. But up until the time in the courtroom, which was required that the judge accepted the plea, there was really uncertain deal on both the prosecutor and the defense team as the weather Brent, who was getting very very shaky mentally, would be able to accept the deal in a way that the judge could accept, because if he was too, if he was unstable, he would be too unstable to accept the deal and

the whole deal would go down the drain. So on the day of the pleading, everybody was on tenterhooks, the judge, the prosecutor, the defense attorneys, and everybody was hoping that they could get through this. And when they first went through the procedure that they needed to, Brent seemed to watch little bit, and so they asked him to sit down.

There was a conference at the judge's bench with both sides and they tried to work out nearly at hoc a quick wording and strategy that Brent Junior would agree to. They finally did that. The plea was accepted, Brent leaded guilty. He was sent to life in prison without parole, and the judge advise, which is all he could do. The State Department of Corrections to How's Brent in a secure psychiatric prison unit.

Speaker 3

Let's use this as an opportunity to stop for these messages.

Speaker 2

Lucky Land Casino asking people, what's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

Speaker 7

Lucky in line at the Delhi I.

Speaker 1

Guess ah, in my dentist's office more than once. Actually do I have to say?

Speaker 2

Yes? You do?

Speaker 1

In the car before my kid's PTA meeting?

Speaker 2

Really?

Speaker 1

Yes, excuse me? What's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky?

Speaker 7

I never win?

Speaker 1

And tell well, there you have it.

Speaker 4

You could get lucky anywhere playing at lucky landslots dot com play for free right now?

Speaker 1

Are you feeling lucky?

Speaker 2

No, we're just necessary my law eighteen plus terms conditions plus see what everytygis him?

Speaker 3

Now you talk that people feared that under the condition that he was in that this might be in fact a death sentence regardless, So what happens?

Speaker 6

Well, at first, Brent seems well adjusted when he's in the Montgomery County jail. He was not convicted until he pleaded guilty, so the conditions were fairly relaxed. He could

come and go from his cell. He get access to books and writing materials, he had access to radio, and because he had become so involved in his spiritual quest that as a Buddhist and a Hindu from both traditions, he felt, well, this is just I'm going to view this as a monk's cell, and I'll just pretend that I'm in a monastery, so it can't be that bit.

But after he pleaded guilty, he was sent to the state prison system, where things were a lot more difficult and a lot more stringent, and he had to give up many of his books, he had to give up his radio, and he did not adjust well. He wanted

to sell by himself, which they agreed to. He began seeing a prison a psychiatrist, but the prison psychiatrists communicated with a member of Brent's defense team to say Brent's long term prognosis was not good, that his mental condition was likely to deteriorate, and there's no telling how it would all end. And although Brent Junior's friends and family rallied around him, and they, you know, they ordered him books, They sent money to his commissary account to buy oiltries

and candy, et cetera, and they wrote to him. He continued his mental dissent and he finally he was transferred for various reasons, some his requests, some of the prison's requests, and he wasn't doing well at all, and there was they there was another transfer that he was ordered to do, and he said, if you transfer me again, I'll kill myself. Well, in prisons, you know, people do say those things and they don't always do it. But in Brent's case, he

wasn't posturing. He had a script or a prescription for taylanol for his various ailments, among others, and he simply stored them up and he took them all at once, and he had liver failure in his jail cell and he died.

Speaker 3

In this trial, there was a person that's a crucial character in here, and her name was Susan Wardell and her specialty well, she was a mitigation specialist. So tell us, now that he is dead, how you become involved and who is Susan Wardell and her involvement going forward.

Speaker 6

Susan Wardell is my wife's sister, my wife's older sister. Both my wife, her sister, and I were at Duke University together in the late nineteen sixties. I didn't know either of them at the time, but Susan was there. Susan graduated from Duke. She had been married and then she was divorced, and she later in life she went back to school the university, first to get a degree in clinical social work and then to get a degree in law. So she was both an attorney and a

clinical social worker. And she gravitated to a specialty called death penalty mitigation, which meant that the federal courts have decided, as they've narrowed the window for the death penalty, that if you have a client as a defense attorney who you think is likely to face the prospect of the death penalty at the end of a trial, at the beginning of the trial, you need to hire someone a mitigation specialist, and that specialist job was to create a

profile of the defendant apart from their guilt or innocence that wasn't a factor, but a psychological profile sympathetic that could be presented at the end of the trial to either the prosecutor the judge or a jury if they go to a penalty phase, to say you shouldn't kill this person. They never did anything wrong before they were abused, there was a drug addiction in the family, or they had all these troubles. So that was Susan Wardell's job.

She did it although she's in Atlanta made a she did it mostly in Alabama because there were so many death penalty cases in Alabama and she got very good at it. So when Brent Junior was extradited back to Montgomery and assigned two very capable criminal defense attorneys, they employed Susan Wardell to handle this case. Now, most of the defendants that she worked with, because of the demography of the death penalty in America, were people of color

and indigen in some way. Brent Junior was quite different. He was college educated, he was white, he was upper middle class, if not more, and she developed an affinity for him, and she a real sympathy for him, so she went way beyond what she would normally do for a client because she felt so personally close to him. He was about the age of Wardell's own two children,

and as Wordell did more investigation. The sinister presence of Caroline Scout began to insinuate itself in her theory of the case, but she couldn't get Brent Jr. To cop to that to roll on her. He would not hear of anything negative about Caroline Scalp, which was very frustrating to Susan Wardell. And then when Brent killed himself in prison, Susan Wardell was just incensed. She felt that the person who was really responsible for these murders, Caroline Scalp, had

gotten away scott free. There was no evidence now to connect her, and that she had escaped justice, and that infuriated Wardell.

Speaker 3

Now you write about fate and another person that ends up dead, and Caroline Scout involved this. Sandy Campbell tell us about this event.

Speaker 6

Well, Susan Wardell convinced me. My previous true crime book had come out in twenty thirteen. Susan Wardell convinced me that I had to write a book that would bring Caroline Scalp to justice, and she sent me all this wonderful for journalist material email letters, personal journals, interviews, etc. Which she sent to me as an inducement to write the book. I went through that material, I was convinced. I was persuaded, and I agreed to research the book.

When I finished her files, I began doing my own research in Montgomery, and I thought I was finished with this case. I was ready to write the book, but I thought, well, I better go to Boulder just in case. I went out to Boulder, did some more research and reporting. I worked at a private investigator would work at the defense team, and then I thought, okay, I did my due diligence. I'm coming back to at that time, Florida, and it couldn't have been more than a few days

later when I heard from a private investigator. He said, we'll never believe what happened. They found another body up on Caroline Scout's ranch in Wyoming, and it's an apparent suicide. I thought, WHOA. So I began to investigate that. He began to investigate that, and I convinced the Wyoming Sheriff's people to begin to investigate that. It turned out that this new victim, Sandy Campbell, had known Brent was from Boulder before he went up there. He had known Brent Junior.

They were friends. He was also psychologically fragile, and then in a more sinister development, two insurance policies popped up on Sandy Campbell's life which named Caroline Scout as the sole beneficiary, even though Campbell had a daughter that he was close to. So the police, at my urging, would not sign a death certificate putting the cause of death at suicide because that would trigger payment of the insurance company on those claims. So that's when the plock thickened

and I got to be friendly for some reason. I still don't know why. With a deputy sheriff out there who listened to me and paid attention to me, which, you know, police homicide people don't like civilians getting themselves involved, particularly they don't like journalists getting involved. But this person, Detective Sergeant Patrick Watsabaw, listened to me and he said, oh, hey, we won't sign the certificate. And then later he said, well, Caroline keeps calling and calling. I want to know why

we won't sign it death certificate. Well, one reason was it was the suicide was a shooting in it. The closer they looked at it, the more hinky it looked. The physical evidence did not really line up with the story that Caroline was telling about what happened, and so Detective Watsa Ball told me. He said, Mark, if you fly out here, you can help us and I'll get you an interview with Caroline Scout. I said, Patrick, how can you do that? He said, I'll take care of it.

So I said okay. I went out to Blunt South Dakota, then drove over into Wyoming, and in fact, through a series of events, Watsa Ball was able to get me face to face with the Caroline Scalt. She wasn't sure the capacity that I was there for, which worked in my favor at least for most of the interview. But I was able to sit face to face with her for two hours and do an interview. She didn't admit anything that I never thought she would, but at least

I had the opportunity to speak with her. When we left the interview, wats the Ball said, we're going to convene on Monday a task force to look into this case and the previous case. Would you be willing to come and join us? And I thought, okay, I mean this never happens. Cops never asked a journalist to sit in and help. So I thought, okay, let's do it. And so that Monday morning, there was assembled in the Sheriff's department in Western County, Wyoming, two coroners, a cornersan investigator,

and Sergeant Watsaball, and we all convened. Everybody brought the documents that they had generated by looking into the case, and I was asked to be the first speaker. And the first thing they asked me about was the Springford merch and how they may be similar, how they might have been similar for the dynamic between Scouts and Brent Junior, how that might replicate or be similar to the dynamic between Caroline Scout Sandy Campbell, the most recent body found

on her property. And so I basically became a central part of this task force looking into this case.

Speaker 3

This task force had a end goal and everybody involved in wanting to that was involved in the Springfield case but also now in the Campbell case, wanted to bring this Caroline to justice and have her testify. So what is the strategy leading up to this coroner's inquest? What do they ultimately want to do and compel her to do, and what would they like to have the prosecution ultimately have happened?

Speaker 6

The two coroners who worked together wanted the local criminal prosecutor in Western County to bring charges against Caroline associated with the death of Sandy Campbell on her property, also with some related scams that they turned up in their investigation. But despite all the legwork that they did in giving information to the local prosecutor, he just thought the case was too complicated for him to get into and he

wouldn't do anything about it. So the next route that the Corners took they contracted the Wyoming State Year of Investigation, who had the jurisdiction if they wanted to if they want to assert it, to come in and look into the case. They agreed to look into the case, but

they weren't sure how long that would take. So the coroner's decided, if the prosecutor won't bring a criminal proceeding, we'll bring what's known as a partner's inquest, which is by statute to determine the cause and circumstances of the death.

And they decided they would make a corner's inquest basically a trial of Caroline Campbell, and put forth to a partner's jury all the information that they were able to turn up and all the information that I was able to turn off and all the information that the private investigator in Denver and Boulder was able to turn off

in hopes of using a partner's inquest verdict. The further pressure either the local prosecutor or the state Department of Investigation to bring criminal charges in a criminal court against Caroline Scalp. And even if they couldn't, they wanted to put Caroline Scalp on trial because there was no other way they thought to bring her to justice.

Speaker 3

They thought that putting her on the stand, or compelling her to be on the stand, they were confident that would happen, but they might get something, derive something from that. She does go to this inquest, what happens.

Speaker 6

A good lawyer and he did everything he could because she had never to our knowledge, Caroline Scout has never been in a courtroom where she was placed under oath. And the jeopardy is if she did testify at the Carnialian quest and she lied, if not for her involvement in the in either of the killings, she would be subject.

Speaker 1

To a perjury charge.

Speaker 6

So her lawyer went back and forth and back and forth until he finally said, if you call her, we will assert her fifth Amendment rights and say to the corner's jury, she is asserting her Fifth Amendment rights of not incriminating herself. But she would not physically be on the stand because under Wyoming law, if your client is likely to take our Fifth Amendment against self incrimination, you

couldn't keep asking her the same question. If you knew that that person was going to assert the Fifth Amendment rights, you couldn't actually put them on the stand. It would be considered prejudicial because the jurors might take the implication that she had something to hide. So she in the final analysis, she showed up in the court room with her attorney, but she was in the back of the room.

Her attorney asserted her right, and she escaped being able being compelled to testify in the corners in question.

Speaker 3

With this pursuit, as you call it, yourself and everyone else trying to get criminal charges to take this further, what is the result of that pursuit and what happens to Caroline scout Well.

Speaker 6

The corner's jury came back with a verdict of homicide, which is the same murder in the case of Sandy Campbell. Afterward, they did not name the person in their ruling. They did not name the person, but after the ruling was announced, they said that they believed the Caroline Scout was responsible for the death of Sandy Campbell for profit. That induced the state's investigators to continue their investigation. But while that was dragging on, Caroline Scout moved to Indiana and died

of natural causes. So there was no reason for there to be a report from the state police. And so the only record we have, the only decision we had, was from the corner's inquest.

Speaker 3

To wrap up this incredible story, you reflect what did you learn from this? And as you write in reflections, what is your conclusion, if any, from this incredible journey into this the facts of this case.

Speaker 6

I take a layered view of how and why the story of four tragic deaths unfolded so inexorably. I view the spread's responsibility for the tragedy in Montgomery and what took place afterward in Boulder and Wyoming. As a parent, I can't fault Charlotte Springford for trying to involve herself in her son's life and psychiatric treatment. To one doctor, she wrote, quote, we love him so much and we

are so frightened for him. The larger question seems to me, is how my friend's parents have distinguished between his neediness and entitlement, his sincere spiritual quest an incipient, possibly hereditary mental illness. Then how soon should they have recognized the venal malign influence of Caroline Scalp, for whom they place so much faith and hope For that I have no answer.

When Susan Wardell first brought the Springford case to my attention in two thousand and nine, they were two dead people Charlotte and Brent Springford Senior, Brent Junior, and Richard Campbell Sandy were still alive. By the time I left Wyoming in twenty sixteen, they were four dead. I wish the outcome could have been otherwise, the Caroline Scalp would have faced the jury for her role in the Springford

and Camal deaths. But nothing more Wordale or various law enforcement officials, and certainly not me could do, was able to change that. However, when I first approached the members of the Springford and Campbell families, as well as defense and law enforcement officials in Alabama, Colorado, and Wyoming, I told them that, regardless of how the judicial process played out, this book would be the murder trial the Caroline Scalp never had.

Speaker 3

Absolutely. I want to thank you very much, Mark Ignsky for talking about your incredible book, Drifting into Darkness Murders, Madness, suicide and a Death under Suspicious Circumstances for those that might want to take a look at more information and other books that you've written. Is there an Amazon page and is there a website please?

Speaker 6

There's a website which is www dot mark Kinski one word M A r K B I N s k Y dot com. I'm also on Facebook. There's a lot of material on Facebook as well, and I have a presence on other social platforms as well, TikTok and Twitter, et cetera. So you should be able to find me in the book, or you could just go to New South one word Books, New Southbooks dot com and you'll find as much as you would need to know about the book right there.

Speaker 3

Thank you very much, Mark Ipinske Drifting into Darkness, Murders, Madness, suicide and a Death under Suspicious Circumstances. It has been incredible. Thank you so much. You have a great evening, good night, good night.

Speaker 6

Thank you for having me.

Speaker 3

Thank you

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android