Support for NPR and the following message come from our sponsor Whole Foods Market. Enjoy the Hot Grill Summer event through July 16th with sizzling sales on steaks and sustainable salmon or choose favorites like picnic salads and cooler friendly beverages. Make it a Hot Grill Summer at Whole Foods Market. A warning before we get started. This episode contains homophobic language and a description of suicide.
On a hot day in April 1958, a young economist working at the Department of Commerce named Madeline Tress was brought into a room with no air conditioning for an interview. It wasn't done by Department of Commerce people. It wasn't done by Department of Commerce people. That's Madeline Tress's voice in an oral history interview made decades after the incident.
She had incredible credentials. She went to NYU. She had spent some time at the London School of Economics. She had worked really hard to get this job as an economist. She's beginning this career in government service. Madeline was wearing a pale blue suit and high heels the day of the interview. The two investigators who called her in worked for the US Civil Service Commission. They turned on a tape recorder.
They began by saying, Ms. Tress, your voluntary appearance here today has been requested in order to afford you an opportunity to answer questions concerning information which has been received by the US Civil Service Commission. She's asked us where an oath. And she realizes this is much more serious than she anticipated. She asks if she can have an attorney and I say no, she can't. The very scary experience. You should want the interview to be interviewable.
The first questions were basic. Name, address, date of birth, and then out of nowhere, one investigator asked. Ms. Tress, the commission has information that you were admitted homosexual. What comment do you wish to make regarding this matter? Madeline Tress froze. She knew that if she was honest and said that she was a lesbian, that she would lose her job. She also knew that if she lied about it, she could lose her job for that. So she said she wasn't going to answer any questions.
But the agents went on asking more questions, intimate questions. What do you do in bed? What do you do in bed? And that's not intimidating. I didn't feel those terrible things. They asked if she had ever been to the Redskins lounge. She was a local gay bar in DC. They also asked her about some of her friends. And so they asked do you know Jumma Smith, do you know Balbaugh, and they kept asking me more names. They're mostly gay people. All gay people.
The questions just kept coming. But little did she know, they kind of already knew the answers. Madeline Tress was born November 27, 1932 and broken New York. She was admitted to George Washington University in September 1950. Madeline occupied a third floor apartment at 2007 H Street, Northwest Fort Period. The government had actually been compiling a report on Madeline. They'd spoken to anyone who knew her. Friends, classmates, teachers.
She's an ambitious, honest, and responsible girl. She seems to get along well with all people. She was young and sat around in blue jeans a lot. She did not like Washington because of the segregation here. Parties that we've attended, she would drink an occasional beer. She was very man-ish. She dressed and parted her hair like men. I understand that she dressed as a man for about six months. She speaks in a low monotone, based voice.
I have seen her wear tailored suits in a short lesbian-type haircut. She struck me as being hard-looking, as I've ever seen. I've been told she's a lesbian. Madeline walked out of the interview, shaken, and angry. She considered it the most demeaning experience of her life. She compared it to what she imagined. Had taken place in Nazi Germany. And she knew something bad might be coming. So she decided to take a drastic step. I ended up resigning. I did not fight it.
She has to resign rather than face potential public exposure. This ended her promising career as an economist at the Department of Commerce. But the impact of the investigation on her life didn't stop. The investigation follows her. She applies for a full-bright fellowship and wins it, but is not able to get it because her file has been flagged as lesbian. She doesn't just lose a job. She essentially loses her chosen career.
And she ends up moving to San Francisco, and she goes to law school and becomes a civil rights attorney. Madeline's experience was not unique. She was one of thousands of victims of a purge of gay and lesbian people ordered at the highest levels of the US government. A program spurred by a panic that destroyed careers and lives and lasted for over 40 years. Today it's known as the Lavender Scare.
You know, it's talked about usually during Pride Month, and it's talked about as a piece of LGBT history, but it's not just a piece of LGBT history. It's a piece of American history. The Lavender Scare happened at the same time as the Red Scare, the Cold War period when thousands of Americans were accused of having ties with Communism and the Soviet Union. But the Lavender Scare was also about domestic partisan politics.
Publicly demonizing gay and lesbian people was a way of trying to win votes to take power. This was an era where the rights and lives of LGBTQ people were used like a political football. It was the start of a pattern in American society that were watching play out even today. It impacted presidential elections. It's often not seen in that context. And a quick note. In this episode, we'll mostly be using the terms gay, lesbian, and homosexual when referring to people.
We're doing this for historical accuracy, because those were the terms used by most people to self-identify and by the US government. Okay, so in this episode, we're going to look back at one of the darkest chapters in American history. We'll meet the people who started the Lavender Scare, the many who kept it going, and a man who fought for decades to end it. Hi, this is Clay from New York City. And you are listening to through live. This message comes from NPR Sponsor Mint Mobile.
From the gas pump to the grocery store, inflation is everywhere. So Mint Mobile is offering premium wireless starting at just $15 a month. To get your new phone plan for just $15, go to mintmobile.com slash switch. Support for NPR and the following message come from Betterment, an automated investing and savings app. CEO Sarah Levy shares why accessibility is central to Betterment's mission.
The real innovation for Betterment was taking a set of tools that were used by the ultra wealthy and making them accessible to the average investor. And that includes tech strategies, that includes dollar cost averaging. These are all sort of tricks of the trade. Learn more about automated investing technology at betterment.com. Investing involves risk. Performance is not guaranteed.
This message comes from NPR Sponsor Progressive Insurance, where drivers who save by switching save nearly $750 on average. Get your quote at progressive.com and see if you could save. Progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates. National average 12 month savings of $744 by new customers surveyed who saved with progressive between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential savings will vary. Part 1. The Birth of a Panic.
Ladies and gentlemen, tonight as we celebrate the 141st birthday of one of the greatest men in American history, I would like to be able to talk about what a glorious day today is in history of the world. It's February 9th, 1950, Wheeling, West Virginia. A senator from Wisconsin gets up to give a speech at a gathering of the Republican Women's Club. It's a celebration of Abraham Lincoln's birthday. But he doesn't want to talk about Lincoln.
The great difference between our Western Christian world and the atheistic communist world is not political. It's moral. There isn't a recording of the speech. We're not here by an actor, but it is fire and brimstone, apocalyptic, a call to action. Today we are engaged in a final, all-out battle between communist atheism and Christianity. The modern champions of communism have selected this as the time. And ladies and gentlemen, the chips are down. They are truly down.
This senator works to crowd into a patriotic fervor. Then he stops speaking in broad terms and gets specific. Very specific. I have here in my hand a list of 205. A list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party. And who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department. The senator from Wisconsin was named Joseph McCarthy. And that list, which he showed to no one, may as well have been a bomb.
The reason why we find ourselves in a position of impotency is not because our only powerful potential enemy has sent men to invade our shores, but rather because of the traitorous actions of those who have been treated so well by this nation. It didn't take long from McCarthy's fiery speech in West Virginia to become national news. It's the moment when Joseph McCarthy goes from being a kind of unknown junior senator from Wisconsin that nobody paid much attention to to this sort of media star.
This is David. He's a great man. He's a great man. He's a great man. It's sort of a media star. This is David K. Johnson. I'm a professor in the history department at the University of South Florida. He also wrote the definitive book on this history. It's called The Lavender Scare, the Cold War persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the federal government. And he says this speech came to define Joseph McCarthy and that moment in American history.
We call the period of the McCarthy era now, because of him. Joseph McCarthy was 41 at the time of the speech, serving his first term in the Senate. And suddenly people all across the country knew his name. He was a Marine, a veteran of World War II, a tough, hard-nosed politician who was not known for making friends across the aisle. He drank a lot and sometimes resorted to violence. He was once accused of assaulting a reporter. And he was a fanatical anti-communist.
So when he presented this list in his speech and the entire country heard about it, naturally, the next question was, who's on the list? The press and eventually, you know, his colleagues in Congress wanted to see the list. A few weeks later, on the floor of the U.S. Senate, McCarthy gave another speech where he started to spell out the details. It turns out there weren't 205 people because the number kept changing and they also all weren't card carrying communists.
And there was another key detail from the list that was confirmed by a State Department official later. And it turned out that several on this list were actually homosexuals that had been removed from the State Department because they considered them to be security risks. It's really the origin of the Lavender's Care.
We are living in an era marked by the growth of socialism, who a substantial degree, in one farm or another, socialism has spread the shadow of human regimentation over most of the nations of the earth. And the shadow is encroaching upon our own liberty. Joseph McCarthy's list and the paranoia about communism began a few years after World War II. The U.S. and the Soviet Union had emerged from that war as dominant world powers.
And though they'd been allies against Nazi Germany, they were now enemies, one capitalist and one communist, each seeing the other as an existential threat. The communist fifth columnists, among us, are working for world dictatorship. To accomplish this, there's strategy as to undermine the confidence of our people in the American system and the principles on which it stands. This is from a 1955 education film called The Responsibilities of American Citizenship.
It captures the feeling that around every corner was a communist, trying to bring down the American way of life. This is Joseph McCarthy. He was using this paranoia about communism to constantly fan the flames of a conspiracy theory. Our nation may well die. Our nation may well die. And I ask you, who cost it? Was it oil Americans? Or was it Twitter's in our government?
And so when it came out that Gays and Lesbians were on his list, it's seeded an idea that somehow they were especially susceptible to the communist threat. Official rationale was that they could be blackmailed by communists. It wasn't that they were communists themselves, but they were, you know, hiding presumably therefore vulnerable to blackmail. In other words, the thinking was that gay and lesbian government workers would be easy targets for Soviet spies because they didn't want to be outed.
Now that alone played on US cultural homophobia, the assumption that being outed would be worse than committing treason. But that wasn't where the rationale ended. There were lots of other ways in which communists and homosexuals were kind of conflated. They're both groups that are considered psychologically disturbed, you know, evidence of some sort of mental weakness.
In fact, in 1952, the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, or DSM, the American Psychiatric Association's defining publication, listed homosexuality as a mental illness. Because no sane person would be a communist and no sane person would be attracted to members of the same sex, whether something wrong with these people. Joseph McCarthy said that too.
He said, you'll find that any active communists is twisted mentally or physically in some way, which is a way to draw a connection between the two groups. In retrospect, that association between communism and homosexuality that's made at that moment is completely bizarre, really. I mean, it's illogical. This is Margot Canade. She's a history professor at Princeton who teaches about gender and sexuality. And she's author of the book, Queer Career, Sexuality and Work in Modern America.
It's spoken enough that it becomes a sort of natural kind of connection. There's a sort of natural assertion that's made that, you know, then it becomes sort of, okay, we think about communism and homosexuality together. McCarthy's list and the paranoia around communism during the start of the Cold War were the flints that sparked the lavender scare. But the homophobia, it struck against, had hardened over decades. I think in retrospect, it seems like a switch that is suddenly flipped.
But it is actually something that is building over a period of time. I would say it's not the case that gay people are new to state officials, but World War 2 does make them visible in a different way. We'll talk about, certainly in Washington and a lot of other major cities, a period of kind of openness and visibility for the gay community, particularly during World War 2. World War 2 was a transformational event in American history.
Almost the entire country had to suddenly focus on fighting a war overseas. Millions of people entered the armed forces or industries supporting the armed forces. The sudden change made space for all kinds of new openness, and this was true for gay and lesbian people too. Men and women being taken out of their small towns, they are brought into major cities, some of them are sent overseas, they are put into same-sex environments, and they are able to find other people like themselves.
There are gay bars that are flourishing in Washington and New York and several places to go, and these ports where the soldiers are moving through. Our cities, our factories, and our farms are today undamaged and protected. It was a fairly open period. We can now concentrate our thoughts on our energies, on the building of a prosperous and secure peacetime America. There's a kind of culture of sexual permissiveness during World War 2 that I think starts to be an element of concern.
With increased visibility came increased scrutiny. There were more and more voices raising concern about changing sexual norms. Our paranoia was growing that gays and lesbians were taking over cities that they were a hidden threat in the shadows, just like communists. A lavender brush and a red brush, the idea that they are both a threat to traditional American values.
The family and the traditional political values, there's this notion of this mysterious and lurking and malignant force that threatens the very fiber of American society. Most Americans are repelled by the mere notion of homosexuality. The CBS News survey shows that two out of three Americans look upon homosexuals with disgust, discomfort, or fear.
So after the war you have a lot of states that pass sexual psychopath laws, a lot of concern about sexual psychopaths roaming the streets and threatening children in particular. You see that in films. That's the difference between us and the ordinary man. Philip, they talk about committing the perfect crime, but nobody does it. Films like Alfred Hitchcock's rope. Nobody commits a murder just for the experiment of committing it.
Before you have a very upper class gay couple in New York who committed a murder just for the fun of it. Nobody except us. By being openly gay you had flouted moral conventions and laws and therefore it was kind of a slippery slope and it could end up in murder. By the time Joseph McCarthy gave that first speech in Wheeling, West Virginia, the United States was already deeply suspicious of gay people. So it didn't take long for other senators to take his accusations and run with them.
There's a whole series of congressional investigations into the employment of homosexuals and other sex perverts in the government in 1950. That's what it's called. Yes. Wow. One of those investigations, the biggest one, was called the Hoey Committee. It was bipartisan and it set out to answer the following question. Are there homosexuals in government agencies and do they pose a threat to national security? This was a serious senate investigation.
They sent out questionnaires to 53 civilian departments and agencies in the government plus all branches of the military, basically asking them how many gays and lesbians they had in their ranks. They tried to get actual names, you know, lists of names, wanted to compile a kind of master list of homosexual employees. They also called witnesses, psychiatrists, vice-squat officers, members of the military.
What effect do you think generally the practice of homosexuality has on the willpower and moral fiber of individuals? I think that is a hard question to answer, sir. I think that would vary in the individual as to his own willpower and moral fiber. Of course, certainly in our society, it would be a weakening in the moral fiber because we consider it wrong. There was almost no one who stood up to object to it.
The Hoey Committee investigation went on for half a year and on December 15, 1950, a little over 10 months after McCarthy's speech in West Virginia. It released a report. Coming up, how that report set in motion a government purge that would last nearly half a century. Hi, this is Denise Fisher from Germany. You're listening to Thru Line from NPR. Thank you. Hey, it's Romteen here.
In this month's Thru Line Plus episode, you'll get to hear an extended interview I did back in December with Jonathan Ike, who recently won a Pulitzer Prize for his biography on Martin Luther King, Jr. I originally spoke to Ike about King for our episode Dare to Descent, but a lot of what he told me really stuck with me. So I wanted to share the interview with Ike through Line Plus supporters. So go check out that bonus episode now.
And if you haven't signed up to support us yet, you can learn more at plus.mpr.org slash through line. And thanks so much to everyone who's already signed up. This message comes from NPR sponsor Bluehost. Try Bluehost Cloud. The hosting plan made for WordPress creators by WordPress experts with 100% uptime, fast load times and 24-7 support. Your sites can handle high traffic spikes. Visit Bluehost.com. This message comes from NPR sponsor Warby Parker.
Their glasses started $95, including anti-reflective scratch-resistant prescription lenses that block 100% of UV rays. Try five pairs of frames at home for free. Go to WarbyParker.com slash covered. This message comes from NPR sponsor Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. AI may be the most important new computer technology ever, but AI needs a lot of processing speed. And that gets expensive fast. Upgrade to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure.
OCI is the single platform for your infrastructure, database, application development and AI needs. Do more and spend less like Uber, 8x8 and Databricks Mosaic. Take a free test drive of OCI at oracle.com slash NPR. Part 2. Employment of homosexuals in other sex perverts in government interim report. December 15, 1950. So the issue of a report in the end of the year in December 1950? Sexuals in other sex perverts are not proper persons to be employed in government.
That concludes categorically and definitively that gay people are a threat to national security. Testimony on this phase of the inquiry was taken from representatives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency and the Intelligence Services of the Army, Navy and Air Force. All of these agencies are in complete agreement that sex perverts in government constitutes security risks.
The Soviet Union has an active program of finding these people and targeting them and blackmailing them. The pervert is easy prey to the blackmailer. They also gave other reasons for getting rid of gay and lesbian. They said they were trustworthy, they gossiped a lot. And also that they flouted the law or that they didn't have respect for the law because in many places homosexuality was illegal. Sodomy was against the law. And so if you would disregard that law, what else will you disregard?
They would recruit other people, they would hire other gay people. One homosexual can pollute a government office. So they were just generally undesirable and unsuitable. The conclusions of the Hoey report were made without any tangible proof to support its claims. There was no evidence that any gay man or lesbian was being blackmailed by foreign agents. And to this day, that's still true. But it wasn't long before more politicians, beyond just Senator McCarthy, took up the cause.
In 1952, War Hero General Dwight D. Eisenhower ran for president on the Republican ticket with Richard Nixon as his running mate. General, how would you clean up the mess in Washington? My answer? It's not a one-eighthencey mess or even a one-department mess. It's a top to bottom mess. And I promise we will clean it up from top to bottom. After 20 years of Democratic presidents, they were desperate for a GOP victory, an open to any strategy that would give them an advantage.
The Republicans campaign slogan in 1952 is Let's Clean House. Right, let's get rid of all of these undesirables who have infiltrated the federal government. And it's a vague enough term. I am proud of the millions of fine, good, honest, decent loyal people that work for the federal government. And I say that the best thing that can be done for them is to kick out the crooks and the others that have besmirched their reputations in Washington, DC, and that's what we're going to do.
So that includes calminess, includes sex perverts, and any other undesirable that you want to talk about. And when Eisenhower won the presidency, he and his vice president quickly delivered on their campaign promises. Whereas the interests of the national security require that all persons, privilege should be employed in the departments and agencies of the government, shall be reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and of complete unswerving loyalty to the United States.
Within months of taking office, President Eisenhower signed Executive Order 10450, which explicitly states that the people who engage in so-called sexual perversion can't serve in any branches of the government. The order also barred anyone deemed especially susceptible to blackmail. So Eisenhower's Executive Order takes what had been this kind of political issue begun by McCarthy on Capitol Hill and makes it federal government policy.
So it affects not only all civil servants in the federal government, which is then the nation's largest employer, but also anyone who has a security clearance with the federal government. Every civil servant is subject to security investigation. Washington have become a place of suspicion and fear. Something about Ms. X pushes me away. Some women sought to dress more femininely. He has a feminine complexion, a peculiar, girlish walk. Male colleagues avoided each other and paraded their wives.
A deep voice, an unusual face for women, not at all feminine, and like a scene straight out of George O'Will's 1984, coworkers started to watch each other and report one another to the FBI and department heads of security. There's one case I found where a woman in the State Department, she just suspected that maybe her boss was lesbian. And she was concerned about her because of the odd shape of her lips and because she would often have telephone conversations with other women.
There's something quite peculiar. And so the State Department began investigation and they determined that there was a dispute between this woman and her boss and so she was kind of a disgruntled employee. And that didn't stop the investigators from continuing to use her as a source. They still took her accusations. Seriously, they asked if she could identify any other people and follow it up on her suggestions. If there were any rumors, they could open what they call a fulfilled investigation.
They would interview family members, coworkers, friends, neighbors, former teachers. It was a pretty serious deal. An entire system of surveillance was put in place to uncover people's most intimate relations. One of the things that the FBI was doing was checking fingerprints with police departments. Local police scoured bars. The postal service tracked correspondence. The US park police monitored parks and sent undercover cops to bait would-be lovers.
So if you were, let's say, a gay man who was entrapped or arrested by police in a cruising area or gay men or lesbian who's caught in a bar raid and you were arrested and fingerprinted, that came to be part of a national database. Subject is white, 23 years resident of the district. Clear, typist, civil, service notified. Subject is white. 24 years resident of the district. C-A-F-2-Clerk admits to being bisexual wanting men only when drinking.
This information then became the basis for federal employers to investigate or terminate someone's employment. Information received indicating the employee was a homosexualist after a thorough investigation. I hereby accept an undesirable discharge for the good of the service. His resignation was demanded. Employee resigned. People like Madeline Tress. It's a very scary experience. I really have tried to walk this. People are still humiliated. There's still a lot of denial.
Most people didn't challenge their dismissals. They just stopped showing up to work one day. It was a pain and fear suffered in silence. There didn't seem to be another option until one man dared to bring the ruckus. We are seeking our human dignity, our equality and our acceptance as the homosexuals are and have a right to be. So Frank Camini is a total original. I mean, he's almost hard to describe.
I have never sought to adjust myself to society, but with considerable success, I'm sought to adjust to society. He was so unconventional in such an iconoclast and such a maverick. And he just had a very strong sense that he had been wrong than it wasn't acceptable. Frank Camini didn't set out to become one of the country's first gay activists. From an early age, his eyes were fixed on the sky, gazing at the stars above with his telescope.
He had always wanted to be an astronomer since he was a kid. And he made that dream a reality. He got his PhD in astronomy from Harvard in 1956. The year before Sputnik would kickstart the space race. Dr. Camini. He eventually found his way to a government job at the Army Map Service, helping the Army map the globe, essentially, so they can more accurately target their nuclear missiles. His career was soaring, and his love life was too, having embraced his homosexuality later in life.
I felt almost a compulsive drive to make up for lost time. And then it all came crashing down. In the mid-1950s, he was arrested in a restroom, in a known cruising area in San Francisco. And he lost his job in the government as a result. But from the very beginning, Frank never conceded. He's brought into a room and asked the civil service information that you were homosexual. What comments do you care to make?
And as a fairly nerdy scientist, he didn't understand like, why do you care about my sex life? Frank Camini refused to resign. Even when his security clearance was removed, and he was ultimately dismissed, he continued to fight. He appeals it administratively. He writes letters to Congress and to the President. Eventually, he gets an attorney.
He decided to take legal action to fight his termination, which is something gay people in the 1950s and 1960s, when they lost their jobs, they didn't think about what my legal redress is. He files suit, loses at every level, he makes an appeal to the Supreme Court, which denies that I don't even want to hear it, the case. Despite all these setbacks, Camini started to change the narrative. In his appeal to the US Supreme Court, he says, this is not really about national security.
I'm not a threat to national security. This is not really about morality. My private life, he says, this is about civil rights that I'm being discriminated against just as religious and racial minorities are. I'm being treated as a second-class citizen. Camini made the case that sexuality is a civil rights issue years before Stonewall or the gay liberation movement. It was a big deal, and while it didn't change anything for his case, Camini, I think just by temperament was a fighter.
And so he mobilized initially to fight his own termination and the denial of his own security clearance. And when those things failed, then to fight other people's. He goes on to co-found a chapter of the Mattisheen Society, which becomes the first gay rights organization in Washington, D.C. And by 1965, they're actually picketing in front of the White House. It's one of the first public protests for gay rights in the country.
It starts off small, but Camini knew he needed to get louder and louder. Frank Camini famously saw Sturkley Carmichael one day on television. He was inspired by the Black Power slogan, Black is beautiful. And he said, we need a slogan like this when he comes up with gay is good. Gay is good. The slogan stuck and became one of the rallying cries for the burgeoning gay and lesbian movements of the 1960s and 70s. After I'm gone, I am remembered for absolutely nothing else.
I want to be remembered for having coined that slogan, gay is good. In all the while, Camini continued to help other government employees be investigated for their sexuality. And even though he wasn't a lawyer, he provided counsel, Camini style. This is so powerful at this moment when I think gay people kind of expected to be shameful and apologetic. And instead, he was bombastic, kind of aggressive, almost harassing, funny. I mean, he really wore down the bureaucrats.
And when his clients were willing, he'd call a press conference. And they'd all have on these giant gays good buttons. And Camini would walk up and he'd say, you know, we come into this room and into this hearing with our heads held high as proud homosexuals who intend to go on being just that. He believed his activism on the streets and in the courts would take hold. And so he took on every client that he could. Coming up, Camini gets the call. He's been waiting for.
This is Sam Yamasta, calling from Paula Walter, California. And you're listening to Through Line from NPR. This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab. Independent registered investment advisors are fiduciaries. They must act in your best interest always. That's why Schwab is proud to support them.
Visit findyourindependentadvisor.com This message comes from NPR sponsor Britvox, streaming a new season of the original crime thriller Blue Lights, a harrowing nuanced portrayal of policing in the turbulent streets of modern Belfast. BlueLight streaming at Britvox.com slash NPR. Part 3. The Scarifals. A claim of possible embarrassment might, of course, be a vague way of referring to some specific potential interference with an agency's performance.
But as might also be a smoke screen, hiding personal intipities or moral judgments which are excluded by statute as grounds for dismissal. In 1963, a budget analyst named Clifford Norton is fired from his job at NASA. Also arrested in a gay cruising area in Washington, he wants to fight back. And guess who shows up to help him? Frank Camini. Camini works with him and works with the ACLU. Together they fight his case all the way up the federal court of appeals in Washington, DC.
Their hearing is from the ruling from that case, known as Norton versus Macy. A reviewing court must at least be able to discern some reasonably foreseeable specific connection between an employee's potentially embarrassing conduct and the efficiency of the service. Once the connection is established, then it is for the agency in the commission to decide whether it outweighs the loss to the service of a particular competent employee.
In the instant case, Epile, as shown as no specific connection. The court basically says to the government, look, your justifications for firing someone just for being gay or lesbian are not good enough, no matter how embarrassing you find it. And that is the great thing about the courts. They want more rational explanation and a justification for this, and they didn't see one.
And this is where we see Camini's years of fighting, starting to kind of push the lavender scare back in terms of the civil service. The Norton case comes down at the beginning of July 1969. So it's essentially the same week as the Stonewall riots in New York, which are often credited with the beginning of the gay rights movement. And this was actually one of its first major victories.
On July 3rd, 1975, six years after the Norton ruling, Frank Camini received a phone call from the chief counsel of the Civil Service Commission. He told him that they would be issuing new regulations that didn't specifically bar homosexuals from employment in the government. Even though individual cases of discrimination still did happen, officially the Civil Service Commission was no longer able to fire someone just for being gay or lesbian. The witch hunt was basically over. It lingers though.
The lavender scare lingers basically for another 20 years. Because the ban continues in the security agencies. So NSA, FBI, CIA. The foreign service, they continue to discriminate against gay people. You know, the security clearance issue, which again is based on this notion that gay people are black maleable, that they're not trustworthy, that they don't have good judgment. That remains an issue.
Basically, if you are gay or lesbian and trying to get a job that requires a security clearance, they can still reject you based on the same reasons the Civil Service Commission would have used. So what happens in the 70s and 80s is that more and more government jobs require security clearances. And Camini himself actually believes this is a backdoor way of stopping the liberalization of government policy on gay employees. And so he continues to be mobilized against that.
At this point, Camini sets his sights on fighting security clearance cases. You can hire a lawyer and prevail, most likely, but it's expensive, it's slow. And there's also an issue where employers don't want to hassle. And so if they're looking at somebody who's gay and going to create a security clearance issue, they just may not do it. It continues to be an issue into the 90s. In fact, in the 1980s, David K. Johnson was personally impacted by the security clearance policy.
When I graduated from Georgetown, I took the Foreign Service exam and I passed it, just not easy to do, apparently. No, it's not. But it was the 80s and there was a sort of resurgence of the Lavender's Gayer under the Reagan administration. And the State Department had always been homophobic and continued to be in the 80s. And so I decided not to pursue that. Because you generally thought like this could be bad, like this isn't worth it.
I knew they were still basically weeding out homosexuals even in the 80s. Yesterday, President Clinton rewrote the rules that spell out who gets to see government secrets. Civil liberties and gay rights groups are cheering about another historic part of the president's order. As of yesterday, government officials may no longer refuse to give security clearances to people because they are homosexual.
The Lavender's scare would finally end with an executive order in 1995 signed by President Bill Clinton, overhauling the policies around security clearances in the entire government. And saying explicitly that sexual orientation cannot be a reason for denying a security clearance. This is how Frank Camini reacted to it in an NPR interview.
I think it's crucially important in bringing closure to this whole issue by implementing not merely a tacit, quiet, unformalized retreat from the government's role as a hostile adversary, but bringing it around to what government ought to be. And that is an affirmative protector of the rights of its citizens, including its gays. By the time the Lavender's scare officially ended, thousands of people had been fired or forced to resign.
The State Department alone is on record as having fired 1,400 suspected gay men and lesbians through the 60s. And so if you extrapolate for the whole federal government, that's 5 to 10,000 people who probably lost their jobs. And I doesn't count all the people who didn't apply or all the people who lost security clearances or didn't get promoted. It's also important to take in that this was not just about a job. People's entire lives were devastated by the Lavender's scare.
In the National Archives, I found the case of Andrew Forens, who was a State Department employee in Paris, a young, budding diplomat with a promising career. He had a roommate in Paris, apparently they were romantically involved as well. And he's brought in for an interrogation and confronted with this. And he goes home after the interrogation goes to their apartment in Paris and turns on the gas stove and commits suicide.
Even after the Lavender's scare ended, Frank Camini continued advocating for LGBTQ people who experienced discrimination, even though it cost him personally. He remained financially on the edge his entire life. You know, I remember talking to actually somebody who was a lawyer, who was a younger colleague of Camini's and had kind of been trained by Camini to do security clearance work.
And this gentleman telling me his memory of going to Camini's house and remembering, you know, how worn the upholstery was and sort of the spring sticking through the upholstery on the sofa. He died in 2011. So we have moved ahead over the last almost a half a century from the depths of the nominee to, well, we have a way to go yet. This was from one of his last public speaking engagements. I mean, I'm meeting like this in a government building.
Madeline Truss, the economist whose career was ruined by the Lavender's scare, would go on to become an activist and employment attorney who represented dozens of gay and lesbian people who were discriminated against. She died in 2009. Oh, in Joseph McCarthy, he died in 1957. After seeing the end of a Cold War or Lavender's scare. If you or someone you know may be considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988. That's it for this week's show.
I'm Ronda Duttvittah. I'm Ramti Narabli and you've been listening to DoLine from NPR. This episode was produced by me. I'm Lee and Larns Wu. Julie Kaye. Anya Simbert. Yolanda Sangway. Casey Meiner. Cristina Kim. Devon Kadiama. Sasha Crawford Holland. Fact checking for this episode was done by Kevin Vogel. And it was mixed by Robert Rodriguez. Music was composed by Ramti Narabli's band Drop Electric, which includes… Anya Mizani. Navid Marvi. Show Fujiwara.
Also, thanks to Tarnial, Michael Ratner, Johannes Durge, Will Chase, Susie Cummings, Aida Pura Sad and Anya Grunga. Thank you to Austin Horn, Alex Bierman, Anya Simbert, Devon Kadiama, Casey Meiner, Julie Kaye, Lawrence Wu, Michael Alba Grenga, Zarina Davina Grasia and Cristina Kim for their voiceover work. We would love to hear from you send us a voicemail to 872-588-8805 and leave your name, where you're from and say the line you're listening to through line from NPR.
And tell us what you think of the show. We might even feature your voicemail in a future episode. That number again is 872-588-8805. And finally, if you have an idea or like something you heard on the show, please write us at throughline.npr.org. Thanks for listening. This message comes from NPR Sponsor mattress firm. How do you sleep at night? mattress firm can help anyone sleep at night with their wide selection of quality mattresses at every price. Get matched at mattress firms July 4th sale.
Sleep at night. This message comes from NPR Sponsor the Capital One Venture Card. Earn unlimited 2x miles on every purchase. Plus earn unlimited 5x miles on hotels and rental cars booked through Capital One travel. Your next trip is closer than you think with the venture card from Capital One. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See CapitalOne.com for details. Last year, over 20,000 people joined the body electric study to change their sedentary screen filled lives. And guess what?
We saw amazing effects. Now you can try NPR's body electric challenge yourself. Business attention is not always a sharia goigasps.