My name is doctor Jack Abrams. I'm a physician at the Atlantic Hospital in Maryland. I'm making this video in the hope that I will be able to watch it at some point in the future, and I'm going to show the world what happened here. I locked myself in the ICU, the CDC stopped taking my phone calls, called FEMA. Help hasn't arrived. I think I now know what is killing people. We were looking for some kind of virus, some kind of viral outbreak. I now know this is
not a virus. This is an organism. It is an organism that has somehow infiltrated people's bodies. The blistering, that's a symptom. That is what threw us off. It is the isopod. It's eating their organs. It's literally eating them from the inside. It is eating their intestines, it is eating their liver. It goes for the kidneys, lungs, tissue. This is a rapidly growing, accelerating organism. How it's growing
this fast, I have no idea. I noticed this rash about forty five minutes ago, and I'm going to continue to take the camera and I'm going to document everything that I see here. If you find this tape, just please get it out. Karin.
It was so hard not to laugh. I loved I loved your rendition of it. Clearly I am not an actor, but I disagree with it. I disagree based on that beautiful.
And that is my audition tape for The Bay too.
You're hired.
Yes, that magnificent piece of fiction is I pulled from this incredible movie from twenty twelve called The Bay, which really the creature at the heart of this episode is also the creature at the heart of this creature feature film.
Oh my goodness, it's amazing.
Hi.
I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm Eron Alman Updyke.
And this is this podcast will kill you.
It's a little different of an episode perhaps today it really is.
I think this is one of the first episodes where we were just like, let's do this weird look thing that we don't know anything about.
There's got to be a story there. Yeah, and there is, and a movie, a whole movie about it.
Yeah.
We are covering what is commonly known as the fish tongue parasite.
Right, or the fish eating laus tongue eating or tongue eating lause not fish eating lause fish.
I mean there are lice or well isopods, yes, marine isopods that eat fish.
Yeah, this is what they do.
So it's a nicapod that we're talking about today. You've probably have you seen the pictures. If you haven't, will will you will?
Yeah, by the end of this episode, it is an adorable little isopod sticking out of the mouth of a fish or it's like in there right where it's tongue should be. That's because it has eaten the fish's tongue and replaced it.
We'll get into it a lot of it. And it's organ replacing parasites. I mean, amazing. Yeah, there is a lot of fun stuff to cover today, but first.
It's quarantiny time.
It is Aaron.
What are we drinking this week? Well, we're drinking Laos Got your Tongue? Yeah cause you know, we just said it. We just said it.
That's the name of it. Yes, Laos Got your Tongue. It's your standard. My tie, which I'm shocked that we haven't actually done before, but no we haven't. So in your standard my tie is rum cursow orsia and lime juice.
It's fantastic. Yeah. So delishous. So we'll push the full recipe for that quarantini and the non alcoholic plasy Burta on our website, this podcast, wiki dot com, and on all of our social media channels. So make sure that you're following us and you can see all the picks and also videos of this recording that we do.
Go now, yeah, we do do that.
You can see Aaron's fish shirt by the way.
Yes, minno madness. We's got sunglasses.
It's a very cute fish. It's non effect.
Did yeah I tell he's drinking what appears to be a my tie could tie.
That's pretty thrilling, yes, oh yeah.
But also on our website you can find all sorts of things from transcripts, you can find the resources that we use to put together all of these episodes. You can find links to bookshop dot org, affiliate account, our Goodreads list, music by Bloodmobile, merch, some pretty sweet merch, Patreon, a contact us form if you want to reach out suggest an episode. You can invite us to give a talk. We'd love that. You can ask us to do a workshop, or you can say, hey, here's my first hand account.
There's a first hand account form for that. And other stuff. There's so much stuff there.
Yeah, well, shall we take a quick break and then get into the creature feature of this week. Let's do it. So, the creatures that we're discussing today are isopods, and I thought we should start by what the heck is an isopod.
It's a good starting point.
Yeah. Isopods are crustaceans, which means that they're arthropods, so they have exoskeletons that they shed between life stages in order to grow. And these are more closely related to like crabs and lobsters, which are also crustaceans they're decapods, than they are to like bugs or insects, which are of terrestrial arthropods. So the isopods that everyone listening is probably most familiar with, whether you realized it or not, are like roly polies, right or also known as woodlice,
also known as armadillo bugs, pill bugs. There's so many colloquial names for these.
Yeah, what did you grow up calling them roly polies too?
Yeah, roly polis. I'm always curious where the different names are.
I'm sure there's a map for that, Yeah.
There probably is. What did you call them listeners. Roly polis, I love that name.
It's very cute.
But so the roly polies are terrestrial isopods. Most isopods are not terrestrial. Most of them are marine or freshwater dwelling. There are probably at least ten thousand species of isopod in the world, and they make their home everywhere across the entire globe. And some of these isopods make their homes inside of other creatures, meaning their parasites and parasitic isopods come in a lot of different flavors, many of
which infect fish hosts. Fish are really phenomenal hosts for so many parasites, and many isopods infect fish in a whole bunch of different ways. Some of them might infect fish externally, like attaching on near their eyeballs. Some of them might attach in the guild chambers. Some of them might even burrow their way like part way into their flesh. And some live in the mouth holes of fish. And that is the isopods, or those are the isopods that we're focusing on today.
Mouthhole mouth holes like mouth, yeah, mouth, Just wondering the whole part at it, I mean, yeah, the whole the whole hole they're in there, and there is not just one of these so called tongue stealing parasites, No, no, no, there are many.
In fact, they primarily fall in the family Cymothoidae, and within that family, there's a couple genera that seem the most common to specifically do this tongue stealing thing. That is the genus simo Thoa and Seratothoa, But there's several other as well, and I think the phylogeny seems to be influx. Yeah, the most famous of these, I think the one that has gotten the most popular press is Simothoa egg sigua. If that's how you pronounce it correctly.
Your guess is as good as my, which is probably not great.
So we can use that species as an example since it's maybe one of the most popular ones. But all of these family of isopods share a pretty similar life cycle, and we definitely don't know everything that there is to know about these parasites, so there's a lot more that we can learn, And because there's so many different species which infect such a wide range of host fish, we're gonna look really broad strokes at what their general life
cycle looks like to understand these parasites. So in general, these baby simothoids when they're born, they're born as like a live birth kind of because isopods have a brood pouch that's called a marsupium, kind of like a kangaroo or a koala. It's adorable, isn't it. And so they hold their young, their eggs in this little pouch and then they hatch, and then they develop through several little life stages before they're ready to go off on their own.
So baby simothoids, which are also called manca or mank that's the like baby form. Oh my god, I know so many, so many weird names, like don't call them larva, they're called wow okay. And once they leave their mothers, they are free in the water, and they will first attach to a host. Sometimes they might attach to a host fish that they didn't mean to, like maybe not the one that they really wanted. So then they might take a few nibbles from somewhere on the fish and
then drop off. And eventually the point is to find a suitable host. What species of fish that is will depend on the species of isopod, but the goal is to find a host that it's well adapted to which is going to be some type of bony fish, and once they do, they will attach to that final host. Every single one of these isopods, these cymothoid isopods, is
born a male. So once they attach to their final fish host, they will look around and if they're the first ones there colonizing this host, they will change their sex into a female.
That's amazing.
I know. It's called protandrius hermaphrodism, and it's a form of what's called sequential hermaphrodism. So they're all born with one sex and then some of them will go on to change sexes over time, rather than simultaneous hermaphrodism, which is something like snails which have both male and female organs at the same time.
Right, right, It's fascinating.
But what this does is it allows for these isopods to attach change if needed, into a female, and then every other isopod that finds that same host will then be a male that they'll be able to mate with and then make eggs from there. Right.
That's incredible because I kept seeing like the female isopods are the ones that replace and I'm like, I wonder why that is.
But huh. It just means that she was the first one to attach.
Yeah wow.
And then this isopod will live essentially the rest of its entire life attached to that host, primarily eating their blood. Okay, not eating scraps of whatever the fish is eating. Not eating scraps of whatever the fish is eating. Some species, because again we're talking about a pretty wide range of different cymothoid isopods here. Some of them, it's thought maybe feed more like on tissue in the fish's mouth, but again it's feeding on the fish host itself, not on
what the fish is eating. But some have different mouthparts that maybe look more like they're sucking pure blood versus eating the fish tissue. But in any case, they're feeding on the fish.
And you said the rest of their lives? How long is that?
I knew that you were going to ask me that questionnairein I don't know. Again, there's so many different species for at least one of these, and the paper that I found wasn't actually looking at one of these mouth dwelling isopods, but it was a different simathoid isopod that attaches near the eyeball of a fish. Those can live for at least one year.
Okay?
Does that mean that they all can live at least one year? Do any live longer? Who knows? Okay?
So they spend the rest of their lives. At what point then, do they like? So they are reproducing while replacing the tongue, while acting as the tongue.
While acting as the tongue. Okay, okay. So essentially it's like this one isopod finds a fish. They are the first ones there, so they're going to attach in the mouth. For the ones that we're talking about today, they'll attach in the mouth far back in the buckle cavity of the fish, kind of near the gills, but not quite near the gills, and then they will transform into their final form, and in this case, if it's the first one there, they'll transform into a female. That's the one
that's going to take up the whole mouth where they attach. Generally, because they're feeding on blood. What it does is it disrupts the blood flow to the fish's tongue to such a degree that that fish tongue essentially begins to die. And then this isopod is able to grow and fill that entire buckle cavity, the entire mouth hole of that fish,
kind of replacing where that tongue used to be. Other isopods will also find this fish and they will attach, sometimes closer to the gills, sometimes just farther back in that buckle cavity which again connects to the gills, because that's how the fish is breathing. And those will remain
as males. The males are much smaller than the females, so they'll be farther back and they won't get as big, and they'll be able to mate, and then that female will have that has that little brood pouch, so it's just holding a bunch of little eggs that are growing and then releasing as they're ready to do so today.
Okay, so a couple questions.
You said that, like finding the right host, I know that a wide variety of fishes are affected or like can be infested. I guess with this parasite and then it will grow. So is its growth limited by the size of the fish's mouth or do they find fish that have a big enough mouth? Do they ever grow so big that the fish can't actually feed?
Aaron? I love you're such an ecologist.
Thank you.
These are all great questions where to begin. So, there are a lot of different species of simothoids and they can infect essentially like any fish that you imagine, they probably there's probably a simothoid that could infect that fish. Some of these species of isopod are more host specific than others, and some are less host specific. Okay, the question of like how big do they grow? Why do some grow bigger and some grow some don't grow as large?
We don't really know, Like does that depend on just who they ended up in? Is that part of why there are strong host associations between some of these isopods and some of their hosts.
These are all really great questions.
They're like evolutionary questions, they're like ecological questions because then it's also like what is it doing to this fish? So there's a lot to unpack there that we don't fully know the answer to. Okay, so let's talk a little bit more about like what this ends up up looking like and what this ends up doing to the fish. Yeah. Yeah, So first I want to talk about what this looks like to give everyone like a mental image we're just seeing like a tongue replacing what what if Google image
search it? But then also I'll describe it for you. I also first want to say that a fish tongue is different than our tongue, and this is important for the idea that a fish could have their tongue replaced in function by a parasite. Our tongue is this massive muscle, right, So our tongue is really important in moving food around in our mouth, pushing it from side to side. It's also important in moving food to the back of our throat so that we can actually engage our swallow reflex.
And we also use our tongue to speak to talk. It's important in our breathing because it has to move in certain ways. But a fish tongue is not like that. A fish tongue doesn't have any skeletal muscle of its own. It's just like a little meaty bit. It's not a muscle, it's just flesh. What does it do. It's essentially a mechanical device that just helps hold prey up against the roof of the mouth so that the fish can do whatever it needs to do, eat that prey and then
swallow it. But there's no muscle. But there's no muscle to it. And if you look, if you google image, there's a whole bunch of pictures of fish mouths without parasites. Some of them don't even have that much of a meaty tongue. Some just to have like this kind of flat surface. Some have what almost look like teeth all
along the bottom like of their palate. So there's a pretty wide variety of what a fish mouth might look like, but they're none of them as complicated as like a muscle that needs to be able to move around and
so well. The paper from nineteen eighty three by breusket at All then first kind of proposed this hypothesis that the isopod could functionally replace a fish's tongue kind of really brought this to light, like it's not it makes sense that this isopod could serve that same function because it's not that.
Hard if not anyone could do it.
Like anyone could do it, an isopod could do it. So what does it then look like when a parasite is replacing a fish's tongue.
It's frankly adorable. It is so adorable.
So we might be outliers in this because when I showed John, I was like, this, isn't this adorable?
And he's like, is that the word is that? Is that right?
Is that the correct adjective? And I'm like, it certainly is.
I know when I was describing it to Brett, he was like visibly shook where he just was.
Well, I think because we immediately put ourselves in the position of having an isopod, a large isopod in our mouths forever, which is.
Not what happened in the bay, by the way, Oh it's not.
No, the tongues were gone and then they were Everyone was eating from the inside out. You know, it's eating the kidneys, it's eating the the livers.
It seems much more intense than just the tongue.
Yeah, I mean, there wasn't. It wasn't, let's say, the most scientifically accurate movie.
Oh. I'm really shocked to hear that.
I enjoyed it though.
Okay, So if you see a front on view of like an open fish mouth that's infected with one of these parasites, the first thing that you'll notice is a pair of black eyes staring at you cut, and then this little kind of almost triangular shaped head, it's like a little bit round on top, and then a little pointy little looks like a chin. Yeah, and then they have what looked like almost little hands curled up under their chin, like the way that a raccoon kind of
holds their across their chest. It's like, hi, hi there, it's how it talks. Oh hi, I'm just making my little home year its cave.
Don't mind me.
And then you can see what almost look like kind of scales that disappear back into the fish's mouth. They're not really scales, but isopods are arthropods, and so they have segmented body parts like a shrimp or something. And then these guys have seven pairs of these little leggy things. They're called parapods, and they end in these pretty sharp little hooks that they use to attach themselves to the fish. Ooh,
just like hook in there. If you were to look, so that's what you see if you look straight on, like aw in an open fish's mouth. If you were looking at a fish in cross section, like you sliced off the side of their cheek, and then you were looking at what this isopod looked like, you would see something that looks an awful lot like a roly poly.
It's white usually. And then based on most of the pictures that I've seen and I haven't seen one of these in real life, but they are usually quite a bit bigger, depending on the species of fish that they're infecting, than most roly pulleys in your yard. And they're a little bit more flattened door so ventrally, so like tummy
to back. They're a little more flat so that they can fit in their fish's little mouth there yea, And this isopod essentially will take up like the entirety of the fish's mouth, the female will at least, and then sometimes if you do that cross section, you might see one a smaller one further back, like almost halfway into the gill cavity. And that is what it looks like to be infected with one of these isopods.
There are some amazing pictures out there.
Really really incredible. If you're not following us on social media, you'll have to Google search for yourself. You should just follow us. We've posted the teachers. If you were wondering when's the time, it's now.
Okay.
I have a question though about the effects, because we basically said, okay, well, you know, it's a job so easy, and I suppod could do it, as in replacing the tongue, but it's not just replacing the tongue, it's also taking blood. So are the fish negatively impacted by that aspect?
That is a really important question. A lot of the studies that have looked at what the effects are on the fish that are infected are primarily in aquaculture settings with farmed fish, which is logical because not only is that a place where you can really study things like survival and growth and length and all these things, but also fish in aquaculture seem to be particularly susceptible to infection with these parasites. Okay, I don't know exactly why.
It is thought that in aquaculture settings it's almost always not a species that typically infects those fish, okay, and they're introduced by wild fish that then come in contact and then they're able to infect like the whole entire aquacultureity NOx right. But there are also some really incredible, sound, really difficult to do ecological studies that have looked at these isopods in more natural settings. What are the effects
on like population dynamics even but also survival, reproduction. Long story short overall, and again it varies specie to specie. Diatata caveats. Fish that are infected with these tongue replacing parasites do seem to be negatively affected to one degree or another. We see things like anemia. We see evidence of tissue damage and of the host's response to that tissue damage, so things like inflammation where the parasite was attached.
We also can see inhibited growth and a reduction in weight and length of fish that are infected versus not infected. In some cases, we have increased mortality of infected fish compared to non infected fish. And in a lot of studies we see a reduction in egg production or in egg quality in fish that are infected with a parasite compared to not infected. Okay, so yeah, it's not great for fish to have their tongue replaced by an isopod.
But Aaron, getting back to some of the questions that you had asked about, like why does this isopod infect the mouth? Like what is the strategy there? And then like what are the trade offs between a mouth infection versus an infection of an isopod somewhere else like on the gills or on the external body or whatever. So there was a really interesting paper I mentioned it already by Brusk at All from nineteen eighty three, and that was the first one that really was like, hey, this
isopod is essentially functionally replacing the tongue. The one that said, oh, it's not that hard. And one of the things that they pointed out that's really interesting is that by making a niche in the mouth of this fish, the isopod in a lot of cases can grow to a significantly larger size than it could in say the gills of a fish, because necessarily the size that that isopod grows
to essentially is displacing fish tissue. Right, it has to like eat away a hole in the gills, which is going to more negatively theoretically affect the fish if it can't breathe as good. Then by replacing a space in its mouth, that's already a potential space to inhabit, right, okay, okay, And so that is one of the big ideas as
to how this relationship works. It allows for the females to grow to a larger size, which theoretically means they can hold more brood, so the isopods can reproduce more readily or have greater fitness, and in the fish, it's
a relatively less negative impact. And they even said in this which I thought was really interesting, that like, well we think that, sure, maybe there's a negative impact for an isopod to replace your tongue, but it's less negative than just having your tongue eaten without anything to replace it.
So that in itself is really interesting, isn't it.
It's so so interesting.
So these isopods essentially were preadapted to attached to a fish host and consume tissue, and so there could have been many different areas and it was like, oh, the tail region not great, not a whole lot of tissue there.
The fish can't swim, it's just going to sink and die.
And that it's like what area is going to promote longevity for both the fish and the isopod, And that happens to be the mouth, Yeah, for these species.
For these species, And like we know, biologist evolution doesn't quite work like.
That, but yes, right, And is a greater size always a good thing? Not necessarily?
Yeah, exactly right. Isn't that so interesting? Though? Arin?
I just I love it.
I just think these I think these little guys are fascinating and fun and they've They've really been a parasite that I have thought of ever since the day I first saw them.
They're one of your what Roman.
Empires, Roman Empire? Yeah, one of my one of my parasite Roman empires.
Parasite Roman Empires. I mean yeah, same honestly, And like every time I re remember them, I'm like, Wow, what a thing to exist.
I know, I'm glad that we did this deep dive.
Yeah, well tell me speaking of deep dives, erin, I have so many I don't know where to begin with trying to understand the history of this, the evolution of this.
The what yeah, yeah, yeah, let's just take a break and then and then I'll begin. It probably won't come as a tremendous shock that the history of the fish tungue replacing isopod, specifically the species that I feel like gets a lot of the press, the Simothoa exigua, That history is a little thin. The history in general is a little thin.
Right, It's like, hey, we found this thing in nineteen seventy nine, and.
Well, yeah, I mean, I mean, and this this so this genus of parasitic isopods actually goes back farther than nineteen seventy nine, so Simothoa was described. Depending on who you ask, it was either Linnaeus or Fabricius. And in the late seventeen hundreds and then Simothoa Exigua got its recognition or its name, I think in eighteen eighty four, when two naturalists Sciote and mine Art included them in
a big monograph about the subject. I probably said those names wrong, but nearly one hundred years would pass after this monograph before anyone would pay significant attention to these bizarre creatures. And in nineteen eighty one, in nineteen eighty three, Bruscat. Like you said, Aaron, we've mentioned that these papers a couple times published, first a monograph and then a paper.
The second paper, the eighty three paper, was with Gilligan describing this isopod in detail and including some absolutely incredible pictures with the isopod in the mouth of a fish, the spotted rose snapper specifically. Also side note in this paper is where I learned that there is a fish species whose species name is boop, boops boops.
Aaron, I almost I almost included that as a fun fact too, because I loved it.
I so loved it.
I was like this can't be some type of seabream, right boops boops?
And I was like, what's a seabream?
I don't know, but I love it.
It's incredible.
Yeah. Also, this episode made me feel really depressed about how much knowledge your brain can just leech out because I used to know so much about fish.
Aaron Same, I took an ichthyology class in grad school. I couldn't tell you anything.
Same, I'm like, what's a how to relook up? Like teleost Aaron.
Yeah, I mean I'm married to a Phish biologist and I still don't know very much.
Listen, we all have our strengths.
Yeah, But anyway, so since this nineteen eighty three paper, researchers have mapped the general distribution of this critter and other related critters.
We've gained a better but incomplete.
Understanding of its life cycle, and we've measured the impact of these isopods on their fish hosts. But perhaps the most exciting development in the history of this tongue eating isopod is the twenty twelve movie The Bay, which is where our first hand account came from. I really do think that it like increased awareness of this parricide and pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. I don't know. Maybe maybe
the Bay is a found footash and documenter. I just I feel the need to include this because I watched it last night, so you don't have to, like you, meaning general audience, Aaron, I still want you to watch it.
I am gonna watch it. Don't worry. I'm gonna watch it tonight. I just felt didn't have time last night.
Oh man, it is ridiculous, and I just it has a shockingly high rating on rotten tomatoes seventy six percent, and I'm I'm gonna I just want to read you one more little quote from it, because how does it have a seventy six percent?
I want also all everyone listening to know how many times I've heard Aaron say that it has seventy six.
You could tell me that it has seventy six percent. That's that's that's gonna be your Roman empire, is that the Bay has a seventy six percent rating on rotten tomatoes. Okay, here we go. I don't think we can rule out a food borne virus or anything airborne, but this looks like a water vector. The blistering looks like a kind of cocosis. I don't know if that is spelt correctly or anything, but that's how I wrote it down exactly.
From the subtitles. The lesions could be mycobacteria marinum or schistosomiasis. I mean, Jesus, there could be cholera in there. If the water's being polluted by anything chemical on top of the bacteria, we could easily see a new form evolve, maybe a fungal bacteria.
What maybe a mutated tapeworm? Who knows?
Ah. Oh, we would be so annoying for most people to watch movies with.
I think, Oh my gosh.
I mean this is why when you and I watch something together we drive other people away.
Yes, yes, I love it.
I mean a a fungal bacteria, mutated tapeworm? Why I know?
What does that mean? A new form? A form?
If that doesn't make someone want to watch this movie?
Yeah, okay, but amazing movie aside, that's pretty much it. When it comes to the history of these tongue eating isopods, they haven't played a major role in World Wars. They don't feature in the Hippocratic texts or ancient Egyptian papyri. They aren't associated with any major developments in medicine. They do have this incredible creature feature about them, which is more than you could say for most parasites.
I will give it that.
True.
True, but most people wouldn't place them high on a list of quote unquote important parasites.
True. Even amongst fish parasites, I couldn't find enough papers that gave them the credit I feel like they.
Deserve exactly, And to that I would say, yeah, most people are wrong. Our human centric perspective prevents us from grasping the significance of parasites and pathogens that don't directly or even indirectly impact us, like livestock diseases. And even if we do acknowledge the role that these underappreciated parasites might play in an ecosystem, it's largely from a parasites
are bad and cause disease perspective. This is especially the case when it comes to conservation, where parasites are more often than not seen as a barrier to conservation efforts rather than a focus of conservation itself.
So if you think of any.
Wildlife conservation program, what animals come to mind?
Big like big charismatic mammals. Yes, I don't know.
Big cats, big cats, giant pandas, elephants, polar bears, sperm whales, these gorgeous and charismatic megafauna. You probably don't picture the sperm whale roundworm that can grow up to nine meters long nine meters nine meters.
That's like when you said it, it actually like didn't even register it because I was like, that doesn't it's not wait can compute, Yeah, yeah, yep.
Or you probably don't think of the protozoan parasite that infects blackfooted ferrets, or the fish hung eating louse parasites that would go extinct if their host went extinct.
Like for example, the California condors lice, which did go extinct.
Yes, I have it in here, I have that in here as an example. Oh my gosh.
Such seal conservation plans include directly ridding a target species population of their parasites, so they choose one species over another. They choose the free living organism over the parasitic species, even if that means the extinction of that parasitic species.
Right, because no one's worried about extinction of parasites.
Exactly exactly, And maybe out there you're thinking, okay, but like, what's the problem with that, like parasites cause disease, they are bad, they're gross, Like why wouldn't we want a parasite free world? And that's kind of what I want to spend the rest of this history section talking about, like why we should care about parasites, why they matter in ecosystems, and why conserving parasite biodiversity rather than reducing it, should be a goal of conservation programs.
I love this so much. This is like such our roots.
I know, I know who would have thought we found our roots in the fish tongue eating laus parasite.
And so maybe at.
The end of this I won't have convinced you to love and adore parasites, but at the very least I.
Hope that I leave you with a little.
Bit more appreciation for them. We're going to call this the Parasite Appreciation Hour. Yes, yeah, this is a planet of parasites. And I don't mean that in the sense of like humans are parasites because we're exploiting all these natural resources and destroying ecosystems and killing the planet, and we are the parasites ourselves. You know that is true, But I mean that on this planet parasites dominate. Parasitism is the most common consumer strategy on this planet.
Nobody Can you say that again, because nobody appreciates.
That parasitism is the most common consumer strategy on this planet. Parasites make up thirty to fifty percent or more of all living species.
That's a lot of species.
It's a lot of species.
They may be the most abundant and the most diverse group of multicellular animals on Earth.
I mean, and yet, and yet, and yet.
Compared to free living organisms, they get a sliver of the attention and the funding. In a twenty twenty paper by Colin Carlson at all, one of my favorite authors of scientific.
Papers to read because they're just so.
Quote from it is, ever from the same paper.
It might be, it might be, it might be.
Yeah, these so in this paper, the authors estimate that there are between one hundred thousand and three hundred and fifty thousand parasitic helmet species, the vast majority of which eighty five to ninety five percent are still unknown. Oh my gosh, hundreds of thousands of species unknown. Researchers who study free living organisms massively outnumber those who study parasites.
I mean, and we can attest to this being like the minority in our grad program of people who study disease ecology or parasites at all, and many large scale ecological survey programs like.
NEON the National Environmental.
Observatory Network barely make an effort to characterize the diversity of parasites in an ecosystem, despite the fact that they have been found in some communities to make up the most biomass.
I mean, where's the caring, Where's the caring?
The bias against parasites is clear, but what is also clear is there incredible importance in ecosystems. Conservation cost money, and the goals of conservation programs sometimes conflict or appear to conflict with the needs of a region or community or the interests of a corporation. And so one big challenge that conservation organizations face is justifying why conservation is important, Like why should we invest time and resources into preserving ecosystems and restoring biodiversity.
What's it going to get us exactly.
Especially if that comes at the cost of human eco economic development. It goes without saying that this is a complex issue and that the balance of trade offs or even whether trade offs exist at all. Might be different depending on who you ask and the timescale and landscape scale that you're looking at, but the bottom line is that conservation must be argued for and convincing people that we need to conserve charismatic species like blue whales or
snow leopards that's one thing. But persuading them that wormy parasites or parasites that replace the tongue of a fish that we don't really think that much about, that these are also worthy of conservation, that's a whole nother can of worms pun intended. In their twenty twenty three paper Conservation of Parasites a primer, authors Limbery and Smit lay out three broad, not mutually exclusive categories that most pro
parasite conservation arguments fall into. So why should we conserve parasites? Here are the three general categories. Number one intrinsic value. Parasites are worthy of conservation because they are living things, and like all living things, should be protected because all of life has value. Number two, their ecological role. Parasites are key species in all ecosystems and their removal could
have unforeseen or forcing and disastrous consequences. And number three parasites can tell us how healthy or unhealthy an ecosystem is. In other words, parasites are valuable number one because they are number two because they are vital in ecosystems, and number three because they are important to humans. These are
not the only reasons why parasites are important. For instance, if we lose parasite diversity, we also lose opportunities to study the incredibly varied ways these creatures have adapted to this lifestyle, which could give us insights into the evolution of novel traits, the transition from a parasitic to a free living life cycle, and even the evolutionary history of cir in host species, which we could assess by looking
at parasite genetic diversity. But for today, I want to chat a bit more about just those three I mentioned, and actually just two and three, because besides the true parasite enthusiasts out there, I'm not sure a whole lot of people are going to be convinced that parasites have
intrinsic value. As we learn in school and as Webster Dictionary defines, a parasite is quote an organism living in on or with another organism in order to obtain nutrients, grow or multiply, often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host end quote. So why would something that directly or indirectly harms another organism be valuable to keep around the answer to that question comes down to
perspective and scale. To an individual elk infested with tapeworms, that's not going to feel good.
You're not going to like that.
You're not like, yay more tape worm.
Wow, this is wonderful. Love that.
But to the wolves who can more easily take down elk infested with tapeworms, that's great. And the fact that not all elk in an ecosystem are infested with tapeworms or have different parasite burdens. That introduces diversity into this dynamic, influencing which elk survive and which don't and potentially driving the evolution of this population. Parasites are well known to mediate predator prey relationships like this.
I love I love parasites and predator prayer relationships.
They're just so good. There's so there's so much there. It's just like life is trade offs. All of life is trade offs, and it's all these interconnected tradeoffs and relationships, and we don't understand it all and that's what I love about it.
Yeah. Also, there's just so many beautiful examples, including of fish parasites that like, when you're infected with these parasites, you're far more likely to get eaten by a bird, and then that parasite is going to infect the bird, and then it's just so.
Good, it's so good. And then it's not just predator prey relationships, right, Like, there's also competition among members of a species. And so in these ways, parasites can affect how energy and resources flow through an ecosystem. So take camel, crickets and grasshoppers, which, when infected with a certain parasite quote, are twenty times more likely to jump into a stream where their biomass constitutes up to sixty percent of the
energy intake of endangered fish populations. WHOA, isn't that so cool?
I love that?
I know.
Wow.
The cascading effects of parasites in an ecosystem are difficult to measure, but it's kind of like, as Joni Mitchell says, you don't know what you got.
Till it's gone.
Parasite removal from an ecosystem is kind of like what we saw with the removal of apex predators to protect livestock, which led to an explosion in some populations, like some herbivore populations, a decimation of others, and an overall vastly changed landscape that regained stability once those apex predators like wolves were reintroduced. Parasites play similar roles in ecosystems, helping
to organize, stabilize, and promote genetic diversity. Parasites can also stimulate a host's immune system, so some studies have shown that parasites can protect hosts from a novel pathogen or damages from heavy metals.
See our Allergies episode for more on that.
Zoomed in to an individual level, it's very easy to see why the word parasite has such negative connotations, but taking in the big picture of an ecosystem, these are vital and so underappreciated parts of this beautiful, intricate machine, one where we don't fully understand how it runs and what might happen.
If we fiddle with this knob or adjust that level.
And let me remind you again, this isn't a handful of parasites playing an important role in a few interactions here and there. Even though I've only given a few examples. This is everywhere, This is everywhere. Free living organism on this planet has parasites. Yeah again, Yeah, parasites might be the most dominant life form on Earth period. And so maybe you're still not fully convinced that we should conserve parasites. I know you are, erin I had you at intrinsic value,
Yeah you did. But what if I told you that we can use parasites to assess whether an ecosystem is healthy or unhealthy. Certain species of parasites actually accumulate pollutants more readily than their hosts, and so they can set off early warning bells about a new pollutant or one that's on the rise in a particular ecosystem, and parasites with complex life cycles involving multiple hosts also tend to
be more sensitive to environmental change. So if humans alter a habitat or introduced pollutants, or if the climate gets warmer and drier, these parasites might be the first ones to feel those changes, which can be helpful for us to forecast potential downstream effects. Although it might seem like a contradiction. A healthy ecosystem is one with parasites, not one without. But as human mediated change keeps on trucking, as this extinction crisis keeps on going, we're at risk
of losing this key component of ecosystem function. As a group, parasites are among the most, if not the most overall threatened with extinction, with estimates ranging from three to thirty three percent at risk. Wow, because when a free living species goes extinct, it takes with it it's species specific parasites uniquely adapted to that species, and most of these parasites have never been characterized in the first place, which makes it that much ha harder to track their disappearance.
Most conservation aims don't specifically include parasites, and very very few parasites are on any endangered species lists, which doesn't mean that there aren't any endangered parasites, because there absolutely are. What we need is a shift in how we perceive parasites. We need to do a better job at recognizing their value, characterizing their diversity, understanding their role in ecosystems, and developing
concrete goals for their conservation. And very importantly, let me underline this, these goals are not preserve all parasites no matter what, because I know some of you out there are like, wait a second, I thought we were trying to eradicate for cunculiasis caused by this parasitic worm.
Should we save that?
No?
No, absolutely not. We are trying to eradicate for cunculiasis and we will get there eventually. Shout out to Jimmy Carter and the amazing work of the Carter Foundation. The research groups that have put together these road maps for parasite conservation make it very clear that there are exceptions.
No one is a parasite extremist. Parasites that are excluded from these plans include those that present a disease risk to human health, livestock health, or threaten the existence of a wildlife species, like the nematode that infects giant pandas and can actually lead to their death. So no, this is not a call to save all the parasites, but it is a call to acknowledge their incredible diversity and underappreciated significance, and maybe just to reflect on our own
bias when it comes to parasites. Save the whales absolutely, but also save the whale tapeworm, save the fish tongue louse parasite. So with that eron, I'll get off my soapbox and hand it over to you to tell us what's going on in the world of fish tongue replacing isopods today.
We'll get it to it right after this break. Oh, Aaron, that was so much fun to just think about parasites in a much larger context. That's also where I will end, but to bring it back for a moment to simothoid isipods, like, what are.
We talking about again?
What are you? What's this episode about? One of the things that I wanted to underscore here because I think that these parasites, specifically Simothoa xi uh gets the most attention as like the one. It is not the one. There are so many of them. But I fall into that trap too. I was like, Uh, this is the one that I see the papers about. It's an understandable
trap to fall into. But there are so many of these parasites which are mouth dwelling parasites, and they're literally everywhere across the entire globe.
In some studies that I found.
That we're looking at, you know, like specific species of this particular isopod in specific species of fish. Right, so like one paper on this species, another paper on this species across the board. In some of these prevalents of these parasites was as high as like forty five percent.
That's so high, I know.
And it does seem to vary depending on the size of the fish. So smaller fish prevalence seems to be higher in a lot of k and less prevalence in the larger fish. Why is that, I don't know. Is it this once they get larger, has the isopod already died? I don't have an answer for that. But it also
varies geographically. Though these isopods are present across the entire globe, they do seem to be at higher prevalence in warmer tropical waters as well as in places where we have a lot of aquaculture, because in some studies they have found prevalence of these fish tungue parasites in aquaculture that are as high as like ninety eight percent. And there have been some cases of like relatively high rates of
mortality in aquaculture species of fish. And that's not usually due to a typical host parasite interaction, but maybe like a parasite that doesn't typically infect that species of fish. So there's not like a general conclusion that I can draw from all of this, because there's so many different space ease of these parasites that infect so many different species of fish.
Aaron, what about geographic range, Like are these parasite species sort of distributed globally across the world or they increase in prevalence or incidents or diversity as you get closer to the equator.
That's a good question. I didn't look at whether you have like an increase in diversity with latitude and stuff like that. I would assume similar to a lot of other parasite and you know species in general, that you probably see higher diversity in tropical areas that are warmer, et cetera. A lot of the papers that tried to look at like overall diversity of these parasites were very
region specific. So we have papers that are like, here's the diversity in the Indian Ocean, here's the diversity in this region, here's the diversity around Australia, and stuff like that.
So I didn't find any that were, well, there was a couple actually that was like global diversity, but they're just like really really broad and also don't tend to be specific to just the tongue replacing simothoids, but are looking at simothoids more broadly, because again, these can also infect fish in other areas, not just in their tongue. In any case, there's a lot of them. They're everywhere. So where do we go from here?
Right?
There's so many open questions how many species are there?
Really?
Because we don't know are they changing in distribution? Like are they moving around? And if so, why, what is it that's driving changes in distribution? Why is it that some species are much more host specific than others. What are the factors they're driving this host specificity? I don't know, so many questions.
There are so many questions.
Uh, and so I don't have answers to any of those questions. There are so many people doing work to better understand the natural history, the other the ecology of these parasites. But I also wanted to end this episode with some bits from I think the same paper.
I have three Colin Carlson papers.
So yeah, well, although it's not just it's not just Carlson.
No Colin Carlson at all, A longtime friend of the pod I've decided we're friends never met. But this was the paper from twenty twenty that was published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B and I just really appreciated this paper not only for its thoroughness. It was like a really long, detailed paper that essentially makes the case for a real need to get a handle on the
existence of parasite diversity across the globe. And this paper uses worms, mostly worms that do infect humans, as a case study in this and it also goes into a lot of detail on like how does one how do we as a scientific community go about actually accomplishing this and what does it mean for understanding our planet and the health of our planet both now and of course
under conditions of climate change in the future. And so I just want to I don't have profound things to say as conclusion of this paper, but like, I just do think that it's so this parasite, which is charismatic in its own way right.
More than other parasites, if we are allowed to be.
The judge, yes, much more than other parasites, because it is very cute, It is very startling, like it makes you feel things, even if those things aren't like the warm and fuzzies. I think that it gives us the opportunity to really think about parasites in a way that most people just don't ever think about parasites, or try not to think about parasites. And so I want to end with this one little quote from this paper. Quote.
Though some consider the task of cataloging parasite diversity a testimony to human inquisitiveness, it is also a critical baseline for understanding biological interactions in a world on the brink of ecological collapse. End quote. And I feel like that's an important thing to keep in mind. Parasites have a lot that they can teach us, and we should learn from them. Yeah, agreed, case case closed, not taking questions, thank.
You, goodbye comments only.
But we have lots of places that you can learn more about these parasites. The simathoidiopods so cute and kill so many other parasites and their roles in our ecosystem. So let's say it with some.
Sources, so so many sources.
Arin, Okay, So I will shout out once again that Bruska and Gilligan paper from nineteen eighty three that has a great description of one of these parasites, and then when it comes to the importance of parasites in ecosystems and why we should conserve parasites. I have a million papers. I really enjoyed one by Limberry and Smit from twenty twenty three titled Conservation of Parasites A Primer, which I
also shouted out in the history section. But there are so many ones out there that are not reviews but like specific papers about this parasite in this ecosystem or in this population, and it's just honestly really enlightening reading.
I love it. I have a number of papers, more than I expected for this episode. I also loved that Brusken Gilligan paper. There was one from nineteen ninety eight by Bunkley, Williams and Williams called Isopods associated with Fishes, A Synopsis and Corrections, And then a one I really love from twenty fourteen by Smit at all Global Diversity
of Fish Parasitic isopod Crustaceans of the family Simothoida. So there's a few other papers that are more broadly about the simothoids, and then a bunch of like specific ones about this species versus that species et cetera. But as always, we'll post the full list of our sources from this episode and every single one of our episodes on our website, This podcast will kill You dot Com. Check it out.
Thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music for this episode and all.
Of our episodes. Thank you to the film director of the Bay Just Kidding. A thank you to Tom Bryfocal and Leona Schoolatchi for the audio mixing.
Thank you to everyone at Exactly Right.
And thank you to you listeners. We hope that you enjoyed this episode. We hope you love parasites a little bit more than you did before. Yeah, and we hope you learned something new and.
A special thank you and shout out as always to our fantastic patrons.
Your support means the world.
To us, it really does. Thank you. Well.
Until next time, wash your hands
You feel the animals