My name is Stacey.
I'm thirty five years old and at the age of twenty nine, I was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, specifically something called young onset Parkinson's disease. I'm a doctor living in Australia and my first symptoms were a trimmer in my left hand, and I remember very clearly one day I was just finishing up a case in the operating theater and my consultant commented that my left hand was a little bit shakier than usual and had asked if I had extra coffee that day.
I didn't really think anything of it, and then a couple of weeks later.
I remember getting the odd weird muscle twitch and again not really thinking anything of it. And then one day I just couldn't tie surgical knots with my left hand, which was something I had spent a lot of time trying to learn and had been able to do just as well as my right hand. And suddenly, all of a sudden, I became quite clumsy. And then over time I started getting just a little bit more symptoms, a little bit more twitching, getting cramps on and off and
all on my left hand side. And then so I had mentioned this to my flatmate, who was also a doctor, and he told me that I needed to go see the GP, which is what I should have done a while ago.
But I finally went and I.
Got referred to neuralgists and de Neeral just said it's likely MS given the fact your female and young.
And so I was sent.
For an m R on and I had an m OR I think a week or two later, and then went to see the neuralist again and the MRI I was perfectly clear. Theenerali just wasn't sure what was going on, thought it might be an essential chremor so start me on a bita blocker called penel and it got better
for a while. And that happened for a couple of months, and then I noticed and people were commenting that I started limping with my left leg a little bit, and I noticed the one thing that was really really off was I couldn't slide my left foot into my crocs that I wore to go to operating theater. I couldn't wiggle my toes like normal. And at this point I was doing training for obgyn and then I had another
MRI again perfectly clear. Went back to the neuuralogist, and by that point he noticed that I had a reduced armswing in my left arm while walking, and he knew, and I knew my medical studies that that was pretty much a sign of Parkinson's city, something that we really hadn't considered at the time. By this point, I've been tested for pretty much everything under the sun. So then I was sent to a very specific type of neuralis motor movement disorder specialist who is still my neuralgists to
this day. And I had a scan called a dopamine of tape PET scan and that should reduce dopamine on my left side, and that was pretty much it.
So my neuralogist was lovely. He walked me at the back door, knowing that I'd probably know people at the hospital, and he told me to take two.
Weeks off, which is something that I really really struggled with and said, no, I can't.
I can't stop working. I was supposed to start a new job.
Soon, and by this point I had very few symptoms and very very intimatetent symptoms, but my world just kind of came crashing down and I went from working sixty hours to working nothing. I ended up quitting the job that I never started, and took a couple months off how to basically deal with APPRA, which in Australia is our regulatory body, and just make sure I was able to safely work again and what I was able to do and not do. And then I went and I
opened because I was just absolutely overwhelmed. So I went and I worked all over Australia to job, still doing mostly but eat OBGN, but also doing emergency and some other kind of small town rural things all over Australia, and.
Also took the opportunity to travel.
All over the world, which was great, especially because my last trip ended up being February twenty twenty and was in Western Australia at the time that COVID broke, which was Australia lockdown during COVID completely but Western Australia the state was the absolute strictest of them all and I was able.
To get up before the borders closed.
During the time, I started messaging my now husband, so that worked out well. But then I found myself into a research job working on COVID vaccine trials and actually we're seeing patients undergoing those trials and then somehow from there, I've found my way into friends with medicine, where I am now and absolutely loving it. During the time I've been on I can't even tell you how many medications.
Mostly my main medication is dopamine, which is something helps me get through my day, or as Michael J. Fox says he called it, being on the bus, getting on the bus if you watched his documentary. I had one of the most advanced.
Treatments for deep brain stimulation two years ago, and I have two elect roads.
Implanted in my brain and a battery in my chest, and those electrodes sent a continuous current to my brain. And I'm able to change this and modify it with an app on my phone, which is pretty crazy.
But the surgery itself was absolutely.
Terrifying for me. It was my first time in an operating peter about.
Eighteen months at that point.
And it was like coming home and away but then getting a massive metal halo and being bolted to an operating table and then having your skull drilled into when you were awhite when I was a white.
Which was absolutely terrifying.
But I'm incredibly glad I did. It helped my symptoms a lot. It's helped me reduce my medication and kind of continue to have a really normal life. I still work pretty much full time, but normal hours instead of the crazy sixty day eighty hour weeks that I was doing before. And I've had to learn how to take care of myself, which was something that was really hard to do. And I still struggle with the guilt and feeling that I'm not doing enough as a doctor and
not helping enough people. But it took a while to realize I needed to help myself and nobody else was going to do it. Dealing with the Parkinson's diagnosis was the first time I saw a psychologist and psychiatrist, and it's been incredibly helpful and actually looking after my mental health, because the mental health side of Parkinson's is another thing that kind of gets overlooked depressions or part of the
whole package that is Parkinson's. And even as my medication wears off and I get into what we call an off period, I can feel my anxiety kind of wrenching
up sometimes. My biggest help in coming to terms with my diagnosis was actually listening to Michael J. Fox's biographies on audiobook and just having somebody who is from my same hometown diagnosed at the same age, and telling his story, which was very similar to mine, was incredibly helpful because having Parkinson's at this stage is incredibly lonely and it's very very different than the normal later onside Parkinson's, we
don't get symptoms quite as severe as quickly. We tend to progress slower, we tend not to have a dementia side of things. And if you've seen Michael J. Fox's most recent documentary, you can clearly see that he's still sharp as attack and incredibly wedding, which has helped me.
A lot in my kind of mental health journey as well.
I have a great team behind me and I'm really really grateful for that and great family.
And yeah, that's pretty much it.
Thank you so much for sharing your story with us, like it's it's really we appreciate it so much. I don't have the words. Yeah, thank you. Yeah.
Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm Erin Allman Updike.
And this is this podcast will kill you.
Welcome to this episode about Parkinson's disease.
Yeah, big episode on our list for a while. The usual things that I say, but true every time. This was. This was a hard one to do. Yeah, yeah, it was. It was I found myself my grandpa had Parkinson's, died of complications with Parkinson's, and I it was just when I started to read, I immediately was like I have to stop and take a step away from this and then come back to it kind of like and then and then I think by the end of it, especially with some of the sources that I read, it became
very like therapeutic in a way. But yeah, it's a.
Lot, Yeah that makes sense. It hits very close to home.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's also a big one. It is as per usual this season, yeah, every season.
Yeah, true, And because they're so so very much to cover, I guess we should just sort of like get started with things as soon as possible.
We should.
It's definitely quarantiny.
Time, it is. What are we drinking this week?
Well, nothing other than the Dopamini.
Teeny apologies for the name. I think it's pretty good. It's pretty good. I love it it. And the Jopamini tini is kind of exactly what it sounds like. It's a martini, so really, you can choose your own adventure for this martini. And any martini you ever do. We are choosing to go with gin or a non alcoholic gin. There are tons of options out there, and some sweet vermouth changing it up a bit, and some Marishino lecre It's. It's fantastic. What a great option it is. We'll post the full.
Recipe for that quarantini as well as our non alcoholic plus e burrita on our website, this podcast wiki you dot com.
We certainly will. On our website you can find all sorts of things, transcripts, bookshop dot org, and goodreads list, merch Patreon sources for each and every one of our episodes. It's just more things.
It's just all the things this podcast. Okay you dot com check it out.
Yeah, I think I would have something like memorized, but we say.
That literally every time, and it never will happen.
And it won't. At this point we know ourselves. Yeah, that's fine. Should we get started on this topic. We should.
Let's take a break and get into the biology of Parkinson's. One thing that is interesting about Parkinson's disease is that it is, on the one hand, kind of a very specific thing, and yet it is a highly variable disease. So what that means for this episode is that it's actually really simple and straightforward to explain on the one hand, while also being a very classic TPWKY scenario, where as soon as you start asking me questions, my answer is going to be I don't know. So let me explain
a little bit of why that is. Parkinson's disease is really a clinical syndrome. It's diagnosed based on clinical findings, and what that means is that there isn't a point during one's life where a single or even a group of diagnostic tests can say this is Parkinson's disease period definitely. Instead, it's diagnosed based on this compilation of symptoms and a response to treatment that generally ends up with someone getting
a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. And along those lines, there are actually a lot of other conditions that look and act much like Parkinson's disease, so much so that in fact, the suite of like motor findings especially that we'll talk about are called parkinsonism, and Parkinson's disease itself is the primary and most common cause of parkinsonism, but there are a lot of other conditions as well that fall under this Parkinsonism's umbrella.
Right, like many different roads leading to one destination kind.
Of exactly exactly, and that is the nature of something that's diagnosed based on like clinical signs and symptoms. Sure, but we're going to focus on capital P Parkinson's disease today and then if you ask questions, maybe we'll talk about the other ones too, since again they do have very overlapping symptoms and in some cases similar causes but in different ways. So the way that I split up this biology section is will go over first off, like what are those symptoms, what does it look like if
someone has Parkinson's disease, Like how is this diagnosed? And then we'll get into our brains to actually understand what's happening that causes these symptoms, and then we can.
Talk about how we treat it.
So the symptoms that characterize Parkinson's disease can be divided into motor symptoms and non motor symptoms. The motor symptoms means movement symptoms, and these are kind of the hallmark of Parkinson's disease. The first and one that has to be present to be able to end up with a diagnosis of Parkinson's is Brady kinesia, Brady means slow and kind is like in kinesiology it means movement, So this is a slowing of movement, meaning that people are not
able to make rapid movements anymore. This Brady kinesia often goes along with rigidity, often what's called cog wheel rigidity. So the muscles are kind of tensed, but not all the time, if that makes sense, Like you can move a person's arm, for example, and it will like give a little and then be rigid again, and then give a little and be tense again and give a little.
Does that kind of make sense? Yeah, Okay, it's like.
The way like the wheels on a cog like turning right. That's why I got that description.
I don't know.
Yeah, So Brady kinesia, rigidity and a tremor and the tremor. I think it's a lot of the press in Parkinson's.
I think a lot of people think of tremor when they think of Parkinson's and the tremor associated with Parkinson's disease is a resting tremor, which means when a person is at rest and relaxed, the tremor is present and it tends to get better with intentional movement, which is kind of the opposite of what we tend to see with something like an essential tremor, where you might have more of a tremor if you're trying to do intentional movement of some kind.
Yeah, okay, I won't. I'm I'm suppressing.
The why is that there's so many right, Yeah, we'll get there.
We'll get there, We'll get there. Okay.
As these motor symptoms, those are the three big hallmarks Brady kinesia, so slowing of the movements, rigidity, and tremor.
They don't all have to be present.
They often are all present, but Brady kinesia plus at least one of the others is the kind of motor symptoms. As these progress, they lead to things like trunkle instability, so that means like your top half of your body when you try to walk is unstable, or even if you're just standing, you're kind of unstable and not able to control the muscles in your trunk very well. And then changes in the gate, which is often called a kind of shuffling gait because it becomes difficult to pick
up the feet off the floor. And again all the movements are very slow and these two things, especially combined the trunkle instability and the shuffling gate, can put people at pretty high risk of falls. So falls tend to
be a common complication in Parkinson's disease. And because this can eventually also affect all of the muscles and not just like our skeletal muscles that control our arms and our legs, there can also eventually be things like dysphasia or difficulty eating and swallowing, and difficulty talking as well, So this can lead to an increased risk of things like aspiration, pneumonia and things like that down the line. So that's the motor half of Parkinson's disease. But then
there's a whole suite of non motor symptoms. And it turns out we know now that the non motor symptoms can and generally do tend to start quite a number of years earlier than the motor symptoms. And yet these motor symptoms are the kind of hallmarks of Parkinson's, and so it's not until these motor symptoms arise that the diagnosis is able to be made.
I read something really interesting about that in how like diagnostic criteria are kind of undergoing a little bit of a transformation right now, or people are trying to incorporate more of the non motor symptoms, because often when the motor symptoms arise, it's just like you said, it's like in later stages, and so clinical trials might be targeting things that aren't possible to target in those later stages, and so.
On, Ooh, Aaron will get there in the event section. Don't you worry? But one hundred percent yes, But so what are some of these symptoms? Some of these are considered kind of prodromal symptoms where they might be present but very nonspecific at this point, so you might never associate them with Parkinson's until hindsight, until many years later and you realize, oh, these were actually symptoms of your Parkinson's.
So these are things like constipation, very very common REM sleep disorders, which is honestly a entirely interesting probably worthy of its whole own category. I feel like we've talked about sleep and doing a lot of episodes on sleep. But REM sleep is your dream sleep, like it's your rapid eye. REM stands for rapid eye movement, and so this is when you're having a lot of dreams and normally during REM sleep, you don't really move, You're kind of a tonic. In REM sleep disorders, people are very
active during REM sleep. So this includes doing things like talking, moving, even going so far as acting out their dreams. And this of course can potentially actually be quite dangerous if people are getting up and moving and doing things during REM sleep as a part of a REM sleep disorder. Okay, yeah, this is not specific to Parkinson's, but very often seen in people who eventually are diagnosed with Parkinson's. Then there's
also things like depression, anxiety, or general mood changes. Sometimes we'll see things like hypotension or low blood pressure. Very interestingly, a diminishing of the sense of smell, so either like a complete loss of sense of smell or just your sense of smelln't isn't as good anymore. It's called hyposmia. Sometimes there'll be urinary symptoms like difficulty urinating or like
urinary retention that sort of thing, or erectile dysfunction. And then, same as with our motor symptoms, these non motor symptoms also progress over time and lead to things like fatigue, apathy.
Sometimes pain can become a pretty common symptom of Parkinson's, especially in the later stages that hypotension can progress to what's called dysautonomia, which is a very vague and general term, but it just means that your autonomic nervous system isn't regulating your blood pressure and your heart rate appropriately, So you can have drops in your blood pressure when it should be going up, you can have a high heart
rate when it should be going slow, et cetera. And then eventually Parkinson's leads to dementia and can even lead to psychosis. Parkinson's generally does not cause death outright, but Parkinson's, because of all of these findings, often leads to a significant amount of life lost in that people die much earlier than they otherwise would because of Parkinson's. So that's
the symptoms and what Parkinson's looks like. There are a couple of different things to talk about when it comes to the path of physiology.
What the heck is going on?
Wait?
Can I ask a question first? Sure, So you said that the non motor symptoms tend to show up earlier. If I ask the question, how much earlier is the answer? It depends?
It varies, You know me so well, it definitely is that it depends. But it's often years, like okay, I mean it could be on the order of several years. It could be on the order of a decade or more.
Oh my gosh.
Yeah, And it's it's hard right now, like because this is not something that we have a diagnostic.
Test for at all.
Constipation that's a very vague symptom, right, even depression, anxiety. These are things that could be manifest that are entirely unrelated to Parkinson's or they could be there as a
result of Parkinson's. Sure, and so it's a little bit hard to tease out for some of these, some of them I think are a little bit more strongly associated with like Parkinson's, and only a few other things like the rum sleep disorders for example, so that you might be able to say, Okay, well this started, you know, three years before your Parkinson's diagnosis or something like that.
But in any case, all of these, especially the non motor prodromal symptoms, often start years before a Parkinson's diagnosis.
Okay. So there's two.
Things to talk about when it comes to the kind of path of physiology of what's going on in our brain. There's what has happened and what is happening in the brain of someone with Parkinson's and why that finding what's happening in the brain leads to these symptoms that we just described. And then there's our favorite question on this podcast, how does this happen? Or as you often ask Aaron, why my favorite question? So first let me answer the
easy part, what is happening? And this is the part where I said, in some ways it's kind of straightforward to explain. Parkinson's disease results from destruction or degeneration of a specific set of neurons, A lot of neurons really, but predominantly neurons in a part of our brain that are called the substantia Niagara pars compacta or SNPC. Okay, I promise I'm not going to just name brain areas for this whole episode. So this is an area of
the brain. It's specifically this little cluster of neurons in our mid brain, which is part of our brain stem at the base of our brain, that happens to have a main function of being dopaminergic.
What does that mean.
It means these neurons are making dopamine. Dopamine, of course, is one of our neurotransmitters. Most people have probably heard of dopamine because it gets a lot of press. It does a lot in our brain. It's one of our happy hormones, right. This is a neurotransmitter that affects actions in our brain. It happens to have a huge role to play in motor control, cognition, learning, and reward, all happening in our brain. It also does a lot of other stuff in our GI tract, like modulating GI motility.
It helps with blood pressure maintenance, it's a precursor for other hormones and the rest of our body.
It does a lot. I just I find it so fascinating that it's involved in GI motility.
Have you heard aaron of like the gut brain axis? Oh? Yeah, we should do a whole episode on that, because like dopamine, serotonin, these things that are acting more in our guts than our brains.
And I love it. Okay, I am, I'm writing this down for sure. We're doing this.
Okay, cool, Okay, But back to Parkinson's Yes, yes, So, these neurons in the SNPC.
Make dopamine.
They shuttle that dopamine through the nerve axons to another part of our brain. Called the putamen, which is a part of our basil ganglia.
It's deep in.
Our brain, and this area in our brain is very specifically involved in motor control. It coordinates a huge amount, if not almost all of our motor functions and also learning, also speech articulation, language function, cognitive function. A lot of different things have to pass through this basil ganglia via these axons. So what we see in Parkinson's is that this area of the brain and these axons, specifically what's
called the nigrostriadol pathway, gets degenerated. In the brains of people who have died with Parkinson's, this part of their brain is completely pale, which means that all of the neuromelanin that is supposed to be there is gone. It's just completely degenerated. So we see this degeneration. And the second thing that we see is the deposition of what
are called Louis bodies. Louis bodies are these aggregates of proteins, multiple misfolded proteins, but the primary one involved is called alpha sin nucleon, and this is a protein that we don't fully understand.
In our brain.
There's a lot of proteins in our brain that we don't fully understand, and when it becomes misfolded in a variety of different ways, it can accumulate in our neurons and lead to further neuronal damage like Preon style, Like Preon style, Yes, like Preon style. You can find Louis bodies in people with Parkinson's, but also in people with Alzheimer's, and of course there are other misfolded proteins that are
involved in Alzheimer's disease as well. Loui bodies are also present in another disorder called dementia with Loui bodies that's separate from Parkinson's but shares a lot of similarities. Rem sleep disorder is one of them, and in Parkinson's, these Loui bodies deposit in these areas we've already talked about, like the substantium niagara, but also in a variety of other brain regions as well, So now we know what
is happening. Neurons are being degenerated in the part of our brain that controls dopamine production, So now we don't have dopamine. If we don't have dopamine flowing, then our nerves can't fire. If our nerves can't fire, specifically, the nerves that are controlling our motor movements, we're going to have problems with those motor movements. Specifically, we're not going to be able to extend. Our muscles, going to become
fixed in certain positions. They're going to be rigid because our brain can't tell them no fire again, no fire again, or no relax again. Right, Because there's both positive and negative pathways that have to happen for us to be able to coordinate our movement smoothly. So that is why we see most of the predominant symptoms of Parkinson's. It's a lack of coordination of our muscle response.
Right.
But now the question is how and why and why?
And that is a question that we still don't know, and it's a very highly debated topic and highly researched question.
Yeah, we know the what.
We know that alphas and nucleon and these lowy bodies are very involved. We know that neurodegeneration is happening. But exactly how how this process happens and the order in which it happens is still very much up for debate.
It's not entirely clear. Is it that this protein alphasin nucleon starts to become misfolded for one reason or another and starts to deposit in our brain, and that is what causes the death of the neurons or is it inflammation because of either mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species formation or because of other toxic insults to the brain over time that leads to the death of neurons and further inflammation which then leads to protein misfolding and alphasin nucleon deposition.
We don't know I mean, or is it are those two things mutually exclusive? Where you know what I mean? Like if the end result is the same there exactly?
And like I said, this is a disease that can be highly variable in presentation, in time course. And there are a lot of other disorders that are classified as parkinsonism because they share a lot of similar features, but not necessarily all these same hallmarks on autopsy of the brain. Right, so there is a lot of pathways to end to the same result. Yeah, so we don't fully know as usual on this podcast, but we at least know a lot of the major players that are involved.
Does that make sense? Yeah, I still want to know why does it happen in those regions of the brain that it happens, Why does it tend to be associated with older age? But yet, like what happens with early on set Parkinson's disease, what environmental Like there's been associations with pesticides and so on, Like, what is happening? Why is that happening?
Yeah, so there's kind of it's interesting. So Parkinson's is an age related disease most definitely, But like you said, it does not mean that everyone who gets it is old at the time of diagnosis, or even middle age at the time of diagnosis. Twenty five percent of people are diagnosed under age sixty five. Five to ten percent of people who are diagnosed are under age fifty.
Wow.
And the time course can really vary because, like I said, the prodromal symptoms can start years before the diagnosis actually happens. Right in general, aside from age, which is like considered the main risk factor just because the majority of people diagnosed are over age sixty five, the two big determinants of Parkinson's disease are genetics and environmental factors, and then their interaction. There was a time in which it was
thought to be just genetic. It is definitely not. There are a few monogenic forms of Parkinson's disease, and much like what we talked about in our Migraine episode, which aaron I was like, how have we done so many brain episodes?
We have done that.
We did epilepsy this season, didn't we We.
Did we do epilepsy this season? Our last season, I don't remember. We've done a lot, Yeah, we have. But like in our Migraine episode, there are these monogenic forms
of Parkinson's disease. They are not the norm They are definitely not the most common types of Parkinson's disease, but they's still a very important part of the research of Parkinson's disease because not only are these forms of Parkinson's disease potentially good targets for things like gene therapy in terms of treatment, but it also tells us a lot about the underpinnings the basic pathophysiology of this disease, even for other forms.
Right. Yeah, So there's a number.
Of specific single gene mutations, a variety of different mutations therein that have been linked to the development of Parkinson's disease. Some of them are related to our good friend alphas and nucleon Some of them are related to mitochondrial dysfunction, but it's really kind of a wide variety, so there's not still like a clear cut answer from the genetic side of things. You asked about environmental factors, and we
really don't know when it comes to environmental factors. There's a few that have been identified as increasing risk of Parkinson's, like TBI or traumatic brain injury, or pesticide exposure, And I don't know what pesticides.
Because that's just like very variable, I know, and everything I saw was just pesticide. And I also, to be fair, I didn't look up Parkinson's and specific pesticides, but like it was just like pesticides. Well, because it's also.
Been linked to working in an agriculture environment, so I think it might be like a variety of different pesticides have been quote unquote linked to an increased risk. There are also some exposures that seem to be related to a decreased risk of Parkinson's, including interestingly, cigarette smoking and coffee drinking, but there is no causal relationship that has
been linked in any of these cases. The cigarette smoking is really interesting because some of the theories are that it actually just has to do with how much dopamine you have in your brain, so it just like delays the onset of symptoms rather than actually delaying any disease process or something like that. Huh yeah, But in any case, we don't really know, but we know that it's not purely genetic. So there are in fact environmental factors that play a role in Parkinson's disease.
And then there's treatment.
And I mentioned at the top that the treatment for Parkinson's disease is actually in some ways part of the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, at least at this point, because since Parkinson's disease is at its core a disruption in our ability to produce dopamine in our brains, like that is what's happening in our brains. The treatment is kind
of simple. It's replacing dopamine. So we give this in general in the form of a combination of carbon dopa and leve doopa, which are like precursors to dopamine, so that they last longer in our body and actually make it into our brain rather than just staying in our bloodstream. And if someone has these motor symptoms consistent with parkinsonism, and they respond to dopamine like their symptoms improve usually drastically with treatment. That's when you can be pretty sure
that the diagnosis is Parkinson's disease. Technically, still, the only definitive diagnosis is made post mortem, with an autopsy of the brain that shows these very spific findings associated with Parkinson's disease.
It's really interesting to think about treatment as part of the diagnostic criteria, like I had never that had never occurred to me. Yeah, but it makes complete sense, like, yeah, if you don't respond to dopamine, something else is happening, exactly exactly.
The problem is that even in Parkinson's disease, something else is also happening. While the substantia Niagara pars compacta and the dopaminergic neurons therein are the primary part of our brain that is subject to neurodegeneration in Parkinson's, it is not the only one.
And it's not.
Only these dopamine producing neurons. We also see effect on a lot of other neurons that produce things like acetylcholine and norepinephrine and all of our other neurotransmitters, which is part of why we see symptoms that aren't purely dopamine related. Right, There's a lot of other symptoms associated with Parkinson's that
are larger than just dopamine. So treating someone with dopamine isn't going to fix all of those symptoms, and we don't necessarily have great treatment for all of the rest of things aside from like treating depression if that is a symptom, or treating low blood pressure.
If that is a symptom kind of a thing.
What we don't have at all right now are any disease modifying therapies. So even treating someone with dopamine doesn't change the course of disease. It improves symptoms, it improves quality of life, but it does not change the underlying problem, and it doesn't change the course of disease.
Right.
In addition, both Parkinson's disease itself as it progresses and replacing that dopamine externally can actually lead to its own problems. The side effects of this dopamine administration are called diskenesia's tardiv. Discinesia is one of the main ones, and these are the erratic or uncontrollable movements of the limbs or the trunk or in tardiv diskinesia the face, things like eye blinking,
uncontrollable neck movements, or tongue movements. Some people might think of these as hallmarks of Parkinson's disease, but really they are an issue with the treatment for Parkinson's. It's replacing that dopamine. So we also see these type of symptoms in people who are on antipsychotics that are increasing the dopamine in their brains. They can have these same kind of symptoms. That's most of what I have for Parkinson's disease.
In terms of prognosis, It's hard to give an exact one because despite this being very specific brain findings, it's a very variable disease. In some of the literature, people have started to try to classify Parkinson's into different subgroups because of how variable the presentation can be, and there's a few different ways that it's been done, depending on
which literature you read. One common way is to separate it into kind of mild motor predominant, an intermediate group, and then what's called a diffuse malignant group, or you can think of it as very severe and very rapid onset group. And in all of these three groups, the prognosis is going to be very different. The duration of disease in terms of how long you go from very mild symptoms that are very easy to deal with to not being able to swallow safely or not being able
to move at all. It's really highly variable. If we think of probably the most well known individual with Parkinson's, Michael J. Fawx, he was diagnosed at age twenty nine, which is incredibly young. It's a very early onset form of Parkinson's disease. He's now over sixty and still very functional.
Right.
On the other hand, there are forms of Parkinson's that sometimes aren't ever distinguished from Parkinson's disease or one of these other more atypical Parkinsonisms that can progress incredibly rapidly. I had a patient that I cared for in medical school who in the course of a few months, like under a year, went from being someone who could kayak and go for hikes to passing away as a result
of these Parkinson's symptoms. So there's a huge amount of variability, which makes it really difficult not only to study, but also to understand what is going on and how can it be so different in different individuals.
Right like just trying to tease apart individual factors from is it the same disease progression like everything. Yeah.
Yeah.
One thing I came across was the placebo effect and how this seems to be kind of an interesting field for Parkinson's disease research where a lot of the times in like a very positive way, where there'll be a clinical trial for a certain new type of drug or something like that, and it turns out that both the treatment and non treatment groups improve equally, Like there's a
strong placebo effect. And I just didn't know if you had read anything about that or like what what that could mean, or because like some of just the little things about Parkinson's I find so fascinating, where in terms of walking, sometimes people with Parkinson's can freeze, but then if an obstacle is placed in front of them, then they can step over it and then continue on. Like what causes this sort of start and stop.
Start and stop? Yeah, I don't have a good answer for that. It's really interesting.
Yeah.
I imagine it's in part because until you get very very very late in the course of disease, it's not like you have no dopamine whatsoever, right, and even late in the course of disease, you have some dopamine that
still exists in the brain. So what determines how much dopamine makes it all the way to the places that it's supposed to bind And what other systems does our brain have as backup to be able to keep us functioning and moving the way that we're supposed to if there isn't enough dopamine for those signals.
To get sent. Mm hmm, right.
I think part of what it comes back to is that it's this is affecting the part of our brain that is coordinating and controlling things. It's not acting directly the motor cortex of our brain or our spinal cord where the nerves are actually exiting and directly contracting or relaxing muscles. Right, So the motor cortex of our brain is what is directly sending signals to the nerves that go to our muscles that say contract or release.
So like the messaging is messed up. All of the systems are in place except for the control center to carry out those actions, but like the messages stop going out except for a few It's yes.
It's like if you think of like a nineteen fifty's call center. You know those switchboard Yeah, yeah, people who would be like bloop blop bloop blop boop, and like sending messages to the right place. That part isn't working well. But down the line, all the phone cords are still connected, right, so some signals are going to get through and some calls are still going to make it to the right place,
but the coordination of those messages is messed up. Okay, that's my me, not being a brain person the way I think about it.
Yeah, Beyond el dopa, there are other options, right, like deep brain stimulation, exercise or like physical therapy and stuff like that.
Absolutely, yeah, yeah, deep brain stimulation is one that I don't know very much about, but definitely exists as an option, especially for when el dopa stops working very well and like later in the course of disease. And then there are a lot of other things physical therapy not only for just like muscles fall prevention, but also physical activity increases our dopamine levels, So things that are increasing dopamine
are also going to be helpful. And it's interesting that was what I thought of when you were saying that the placebo e fact seems very strong in.
People with Parkinson's.
And I do wonder because we don't understand the Placino effect. I mean, anyone can have a Placbo effect. Pacibo effect is awesome. We have.
It's pretty cool.
It's fascinating and very cool, and I wonder, like how much is it it is? It is our neurotransmitters, most likely because our brain is controlling so much. Is it that we think that something is working and so we are producing more dopamine and that is part of what's telling us that something is working and serotonin and whatever else.
Ah, yeah, I mean I don't know, but I'm I'm right now as we speak adding it to our list of episodes topic placebo effect. That's a good one. So that's Parkinson's disease. You're right, it's like very fairly straightforward. But also we don't know what the heck is going on in our brain.
Yeah, well, like we know what's going on in our brain, we just don't know why.
Yeah yeah, And we like why does the swinging arms when walking? Why does that stop? Like yeah? Why? Yeah?
I mean probably just too much this is me guessing, but like too many things to coordinate, right.
Yeah, yeah, it's fascinating.
Yeah.
Yeah, well, Aaron, can I ask you.
How did we get here? Where did Parkinson's come from? Besides our brain or maybe our environment?
I don't know. Yeah, lots of questions there. Let's take a break and then I'll see what I can do. Aaron, you asked, where did this come from? You know I'm not going to be able to answer that question unfortunately. No, And I think at this point it's not a question that anyone can answer, at least with any level of certainty. Humans seem to be the only species that develops Parkinson's
disease naturally, like it can be induced in animal models. Interesting, and maybe people have hypothesized that that's due to our pretty good longevity. We have pretty long, long longevity, as suggesting that Parkinson's disease is more or less mostly a disease of aging. But what about like blue whales or giant tortoises, other creatures that have longevity. Yeah, sea turtles
live like undreds of years man. Yeah, and as far as I have read, they have not been observed to develop Parkinson's, So maybe it's something to do with our human brain. I did come across one paper that refutes the more like widely accepted preon kind of misfolded protein model for Parkinson's, and the authors instead suggest that it has to do with how during early human evolution, our brain expanded in certain ways that left other parts behind.
So like the olfactory part of our brain is smaller relative to other primates, for instance, and those areas that didn't expand during human brain evolution maybe are more susceptible to like neuron loss. I don't know. I also did come across that humans have relatively fewer dopamine neurons than
other animals as a function of size. So the example that I came across was that a mouse has roughly twenty thousand dopamine neurons, while an average human has around four hundred thousand, So it's only twenty times more than a mouse, despite humans being well more than twenty times the size of a mouse. Okay, interesting, I don't know. And part of the reason I don't know and no one seems to really know is that the driver's and precise path of physiology of Parkinson's disease have not been
fully worked out right. But don't worry, there is still so so much more to talk about in terms of the history of Parkinson's disease, and so for now, let's head back to the ancient world to see whether people recognize the disease long ago. Did they? Did they? Yes, of course they did. Hah. There's an ancient Egyptian papyrus that describes excessive drooling in an elderly king. There are ancient Indian texts that describe a chronic progressive condition, including
tremor and lack of movement. There are ancient Chinese teps that describe tremor and stiffness, and one of our frequent mentions, the ancient Greek physician Galen wrote of resting and action tremors. What's really fascinating is that in some of the ancient Indian and ancient Chinese texts, treatment was recommended in the form of various herbal concoctions, often containing seeds or extracts
from seeds. And it turns out that some of those seeds, when analyzed, you know, in the twentieth century, contain LEVDOPA or have anti colinergic and dopaminergic properties. Is that kind of really? I just love that, Like it probably worked. Yeah. Yeah. There are also a handful of possible references to Parkinson's
that pop up throughout the centuries. Leonardo da Vinci wrote about people quote whose soul cannot control their movements in spite of the fact that their extremities are shaking continuously end quote. There's a possible reference to Parkinson's disease in Shakespeare's Henry the sixth Part two. Dick the butcher asks why dost thou quiver man, and Lord say replies, the palsy and not fear provokes me. And philosopher Thomas Hobbes, who lived in the seventeenth century, is thought to have
had it. Quote he had the shaking palsy in his hands, which began in France before the year sixteen fifty, when he was aged sixty two, and has grown upon him by degrees ever since, so that he has not been able to write very legibly since sixteen fifty five or sixteen sixty six. So people have clearly recognized Parkinson's disease for a long time, But how would it get its name, like?
Who was Parkinson? Essentially? James Parkinson was born in seventeen fifty five in London, England, and decided to follow in his father's footsteps, training as a surgeon and apothecary, but also becoming in the meantime a political pamphleteer, a member of secret societies, a pacifist, a campaigner for social welfare, involved in like mysterious plots, a paleontologist and geologist. I'm sorry, yeah,
I don't know how he had all this time. Yeah, to also possibly be the first to describe appendicitis maybe, and was, of course the namesake of Parkinson's disease.
Sorry, I can't get over the paleontologist too, Like what Yeah?
I think that was one of his most famous publications was on like paleontology slash geology.
I am envious, right, I'm one of jack of all trades that well, I mean.
Gosh, I mean I feel like you do. Thanks appreciate that. You just have to start publishing pamphlets. Now, there you go. I could do a pamphlet, pamphlet, will create a secret society and then check done anyway. In eighteen seventeen, Parkinson published a paper titled Essay on the Shaking Palsy, in which he described six cases a combination of patients that he had personally examined, as well as one or two
that you just saw walking around the neighborhood. I know it's I it's amazing to me that this is the paper and one of it, like one of the case descriptions is literally like I did not have a chance to talk to this person, but this is what they looked like from AFAR. So you know, okay, eighteen seventeen publishing standards. Yeah, no, IRB, that's for sure. No, no. So I'm going to read a little quote from this quote.
So slight and nearly imperceptible are the inroads of this malady, and so extremely slow its progress that the patient cannot recall the onset. The first symptoms perceived are a slight sense of weakness with a proneness to trembling, most commonly in one of the hands and arms. As the disease proceeds, the hand fails to answer the dictates of the will. Walking becomes a task which cannot be performed with how considerable attention care is necessary to prevent falls, difficulties increase.
Writing can now be hardly at all accomplished, and reading from the tremulous motion is accomplished with some difficulty. End quote. I really just liked that phrase. The hand fails to answer the dictates of the will. Yeah.
Yeah, I feel like that's a very good descriptor of what's.
Going on in the brain. Yeah. It uses way fewer words than what we did trying to talk about the control tower, and it took me like forty minutes to like the hand can't do it. And then Parkinson's in this essay goes on to describe changes in walking, the tendency for constipation to be a frequent symptom, and then
the final stages of disease. Parkinson also laid out some of the ideas that he had about what caused the disease, which he thought originated in like the spinal cord or brainstem you know, yeah, not far off, yeah, as well as possible treatments, mostly relating to bloodletting, but ultimately acknowledged that nothing had an effect and said that he hoped that that would change one day if enough people, you know, put their attention to this, put their focus on this disease.
And at the time that it was published, the essay didn't really make much of a splash, and he died in eighteen twenty four, seven years after it was published, never knowing just how famous his name would become. Wow. And in fact, we might today call the disease by a completely different name if it weren't for Jean Martin Scharco. I've definitely mentioned Charco several times on the podcast before. Very famous dude. Yeah, and he at least makes an
appearance in our episodes on multiple sclerosis and endometriosis. I think probably other ones as well, epilepsi. I don't know. Charco was a famous, famous medical scientist, both in his time as well as today, and his primary interest was in diseases of the nerves. People came from all over to watch him lecture at the public hospital where he worked in Paris, and the list of diseases he recognized or described, or that have been named after him, it's
a long list. It's a very long list. Yeah. Almost fifty years after Parkinson's essay was published, Sharko got his hands on a copy and immediately recognized that many of his patients seemed to have the condition that Parkinson was describing, and so he went about systematically characterizing the disease as
he had done with other conditions. He listed the most common symptoms tremor, rigidity, slowness, or poverty of movement, and postural instability, all of which Parkinson had pointed out, and then he added two more small handwriting and facial masking. Oh yeah, facial masking. Yeah, Aaron, could you give us a quick definition of facial masking.
Yeah, a mask faces or facial masking means like a face that's not really able to make expression. So it's a very expressionless face, which is really common in Parkinson's disease, especially later in the disease.
Okay, thank you, that's what I thought it was, but I wasn't confident enough to give a definition. Yeah, appreciate it. Charcot also noted that tremor wasn't a consistently present symptom and argued that because of that, the condition shouldn't be called shaking palsy, but rather Parkinson's disease. Wow, so he named Parkinson's disease. Charco also described brady kinesia as a
distinct symptom. Quote in some of the various patients I showed you, you can easily recognize how difficult it is for them to do things, even though rigidity or tremor is not the limiting feature. Instead, even a cursory exam demonstrates that their problem relates more to slowness in execution of movement rather than to real weakness end quote. Charco's contributions to Parkinson's disease went beyond adding to its description or raising awareness of the condition among the medical community.
He also tried out all sorts of experimental therapies, medicines such as hiosiamine derived from Jimson weed, belladonna, cannabis, arsenic opium, and hemlo, as well as non pharmaceutical interventions like his quote unquote shaking chair and shaking helmet. Dear. So, he observed that symptoms sometimes got better after long carriage rides or horseback rides, and so he thought that shaking would help. It didn't. He did run trials and there were some benefits,
but it was due to placebo effect. And when his shaking chair and shaking helmet didn't work, he also tried electrical stimulation SPA treatments, even some horrible sounding contraption that was supposed to stretch the spinal cord. Oh, dear did nothing. That's a torture device. Yeah, I think really nothing seemed to have an effect, and so you know, he reasoned maybe if the cause of the disease were to be discovered,
then more effective treatments could be developed. So to try to identify the physical basis of Parkinson's disease, he was going to need to do a lot of autopsies, and fortunately the hospital where he worked had no shortage of opportunities for that since it took in many wards of the state. Ultimately, it wasn't Sharko himself but a couple of his students who would end up finding a hazelnut sized lump in the right side of the midbrain, close to the substantia nigra, and this was in a thirty
eight year old patient with Parkinson's. Wow, so maybe the substantia nigra was where Parkinson's originated. Seemed like a reasonable hypothesis, but no one really did anything about it for twenty five years or so until nineteen nineteen. That was the year that a Russian graduate student named Konstantine Tretiakov who was working in Paris, published his findings from fifty four
autopsied brains. All of the nine from people with Parkinson's had extensive damage to the substantia nigra, and none of the other brains did even more compelling was his finding of neuronal inclusions in the brains of people with Parkinson's and that was the same finding that Fritz Louis had
previously made aka Louis Bodies Louie buddies. Okay, And this narrowing in on what changed physiologically or physically in Parkinson's disease really helped researchers to focus their efforts on possible treatments, because if they knew what was actually changing and how those changes were associated with the signs of Parkinson's disease, then maybe they could develop a treatment to slow the progress or at the very least alleviate the symptoms of
the condition. And that's where we find ourselves with dopamine and eldopa. The story begins in nineteen ten. That year, dopamine was first synthesized by researchers Burger and Ewan, who I think were more or less just casting a wide net for chemicals that had an effect on the sympathetic nervous system. Seemed like a very hot time for that kind of research, Like I couldn't get at why they were looking at dopamine, or how they found dopamine, or
what they were looking for when they found it. Okay, that's as far as I could discern. But at the time of this publication and for decades after, dopamine was not really considered anything more than an intermediate compound in the production of adrenaline and nor adrenaline. It was just sort of like, nah, this is unimportant by itself, right, Yeah.
Also, no, adrenaline and adrenaline are also called epinefrinin nor epinephrine today today, Yeah, I feel like that's important because I said nor epineffyrin earlier, so.
I know, well, and that's what like. I may have changed it, but I think I had them both in here. They're both so they're both correct.
Yeah.
Yeah. A year after this paper came out, d L dopa, so like another form of el dopa, was first synthesized by Casimir Funk, who this is a good TPWKY trivia question. Does his name sounds familiar to you? Yeah? It does.
Oh, I feel like it's one of our chemical episodes and it's not tilan all, is it.
No? Well maybe, I mean I don't I don't know. I would not have gotten this. I had to search. He coined the word vitamin. Oh. Yeah, because they're vital. Okay, vital I mean yeah yeah. And a couple of years after that, another researcher, Marcus Guggenheim, isolated el dopa from fava beans, decided to try it out why don't know, and quickly discovered its tendency to induce vomiting, but he didn't notice any other effect, and so he just wrote it off as a naturally occurring molecule with no real
therapeutic promise. Oh wow, yeah, like, why would anyone want to take this? It has this horrible side effect? And then in nineteen thirty eight, I swear we're getting there. It's just like a lot of steps along this stree.
I love this, Okay. Researcher Peter Holtz and colleagues discovered the enzyme dopa decarboxylase, which converts el dopa to dopamine, and that revealed how dopamine could be created in the brain if you gave someone el dopa, Because well, dopamine cannot cross the blood brain barrier on its own, el dopa can. Yeah, And by the nineteen fifties, people were starting to suspect that maybe dopamine was actually important as just an individual molecule.
Wow, nineteen fifties, nineteen fifty and maybe even more than important.
It was essential huh yeah. One of the most prominent names associated with this reframing of dopamine was a Swedish researcher named Arvid Carlson, who in the late nineteen fifties was leading a team researching the effects of the recently introduced to antipsychotic drug resurpene or resurpine I'm not sure. They gave rabbits various doses and found that at higher doses of recurpene the rabbits became paralyzed with Parkinson's like symptoms.
Carlson suggested that maybe the drug was blocking the uptake of an essential neurotransmitter in the brain and thought that maybe if they injected the rabbits with el dopa, then maybe the balance of neurotransmitters like adrenaline and ner adrenaline or epinephrin and nora openephrin would be restored. And sure enough, the el dopa worked almost like magic. The rabbits woke up and were moving around in no time. But was it because because the balance had been restored or was
something else going on? When Carlson took a closer look at the chemical makeup in the rabbit's brains. He found that the el dopa didn't convert into adrenaline and nor adrenaline as he had expected, but rather this supposedly unimportant molecule dopamine. Wow, it was like, Okay, this is kind
of revolutionary. And then then not long after, researcher Kathleen Montague demonstrated the presence of dopamine in the brain of humans, and that was later confirmed by Carlson's lab, and they had developed assays to measure like the amount of dopamine in different parts of the body and different parts of the brain, which also was like whoa, yeah, more here
going on than we thought. And so all of this together led Carlson to suggest that dopamine was essential for normal brain function and the control of movement, and that adop deficiency maybe at the root of Parkinson's disease, and that just so.
That I understand, they are like reasoning behind it was because of the symptoms that they saw in animals who were dopamine deficient, or that they blocked their dopamine receptors, but not yet necessarily because they made the connection between the neurons in the part of the brain that they already knew were involved right from way back when that those also happened to be the dopo energic neurons.
Right, there was still that sort of connection. So they saw, Okay, there is something that this drug is doing to prevent movement that's probably related to a neurotransmitter. We don't know that it's dopamine. Okay, So then what if we gave this neurotransmitter precursor aka L dopa dopa to the rabbits, Maybe that'll help fix things up. Yep, it worked way better than anticipated, and so then they took a closer look. They were like, hey, dopamine. Dopamine seems to be the
answer here. And so since the symptoms in the rabbits were very similar to Parkinson's disease, dopamine Parkinson's and then we're almost getting there. I love it. We're so close. And it's now the nineteen sixties. You said, nineteen fifty eight is when he presented this hypothesis at the first International Catacholamine Symposium.
Okay, I love this. What a symposium to be at, right.
It was completely rejected His hypothesis morale, his hypothesis.
Sid dopamine was involved in Parkinson's based on these findings.
Yep, yeah, fascinating. Okay, okay, yeah. They were like more data, bro, They were like, you need more data. Also, stop with dopamine. Dopamine's never going to happen. It doesn't have a future. Oh my gosh, fetch that's exactly what I was thinking of. But Carlson would get the very last laugh when he was awarded first of all, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in two thousand for his revolutionary work on dopamine,
not just in Parkinson's but in general. And there were also many other laughs along the way, because while this hypothesis is probably not the best way to say that, but while this hypothesis was widely rejected, it wasn't unanimously rejected.
Two Austrian researchers I apologized for my poor pronunciation. Ole Hornikowitz and Herbert Arainger were intrigued by this idea, and they decided to dig a bit deeper, which involved examining some brain samples from people who had died with Parkinson's, and sure enough, they found that the neurons in the region of the brain that was critical for movement, they were depleted of dopamine. Further, the substantia nigra region was
also completely missing dopamine. So finally a dopamine centered framework of Parkinson's disease was coming to together, which was exciting on its own because it was like, oh, my gosh,
finally we're understanding how these pieces are fitting together. But it was also potentially revolutionary because it promised hope for effective treatment, right because they already did the el dopa in the rabbits exactly and at this point treatment didn't exist, right, and so it was like it was an uncontrollable progression and that was the state of Parkinson's at the time. Maybe el dopa was the long awaited answer, and it
seemed so, at least initially. In nineteen sixty one, researchers Walter Burkmeyer and Ole Hornikowitz administered small doses of el dopa to twenty patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Hornikowitz later remembered the scene quote, it was a spectacular moment to see the patients who could not walk, could not get up from bed, could not stand up when seated, start walking.
They all performed these activities like normal. Speech became better, they started laughing and actually crying with joy end quote wow. And even though Hornikowitz filmed this transformation, there were still doubters,
and rightfully so. The dosages that they had given these patients were relatively small, and only a small proportion of el dopa is known to cross the blood brain barrier, and so some people suggested that it was largely due to placebo effect, which we talked about does happen, and
a double blind study supported this doubt. In some ways, el dopa was found to be no more effective in relieving symptoms than saline, and it was beginning to be recognized to cause serious side effects like high blood pressure and nausea. But the Parkinson's field wasn't ready to give up quite yet. Maybe it was just a matter of
finding the sweet spot for dosage. George Ktesias made a major breakthrough when he tried scaling up the dose, so starting out small and then gradually increasing, and this helped to limit the adverse side effects seen early on with the early big doses, but still allowed to build up those doses to more effective levels. Another big step forward was the addition of carbon doopa, which allowed more of the el dopa to pass through the blood brain barrier.
Researcher Roger Duvoissen described what happened when he gave a patient this combo in nineteen sixty seven. Quote the effect was so dramatic, I couldn't believe it. Patients were so improved that they didn't look like they had Parkinson's anymore. End quote. The dramatic transformation that eldopa had on people
with Parkinson's disease and Parkinson's like disease. If you remember from our encephalitis lethargica episode from way back or the slash movie Awakenings by Oliver Sachs, which we talked about in that episode, the difference was so stark, the improvement was so great that this was really something that had rarely been seen before and has rarely been seen since in the history of medicine. Truly, Like the only other things that came to mind to me in terms of
like near instant improvement are antibiotics and insulin. Yeah, just like immediate holy cow reversal, What is happening like or complete elimination of symptoms.
Like changing lives immediately immediately.
Yeah, and I'm sure there are others, but the introduction of el dopa it was absolutely revolutionary, and of course it wasn't Sunshine and Roses Forever, which you also may
remember from r encephalitis lethargic episode. After a month or two of taking it, people began to experience severe side effects, including problem like you mentioned Aaron with involuntary movement, and as time went on, people developed a tolerance for the drug, which meant that higher and higher doses had to be given, leading to more and more side effects like confusion, agitation, paranoia,
and hallucinations. And occasionally the drug would just randomly stop working, almost like a switch was flipped from on to off. There's no denying that el dopa is an incredible drug, but it also does come at a cost, and that's one that must be carefully weighed by people with Parkinson's disease and their medical providers in terms of like when
to start and so on. And the trade offs inherent with el dopa have also led people to search for alternative therapies, from surgeries and deep brain stimulation to neural graphs, neuroprotective treatments like MAO inhibitors which prevent the degradation of dopamine even phase therapy. I saw mentioned Oh interesting, I meant to read more about that. Each of those treatments has a story, and I know that there are probably eight million more on the horizon that you're going to
talk about, which is amazing. Not to mention, there's the whole part about how we learned more about the genetic and potential environmental causes of Parkinson's. But so this doesn't turn into a million hour episode. I'm not going to go down those rabbit holes today. I do, however, have one more story to tell before turning it over to you. So I told the story just now of l DOPA and how it revolutionized treatment, and this next story is
another revolution, but of a slightly different kind. I'm thrilled. One of the biggest challenges for many diseases that are specific to humans is not having an appropriate animal model. We've talked about this a bunch on the podcast. It makes it much more difficult to test out new treatments or conduct experiments to understand the mechanism of disease. Until the nineteen eighties or so, there were a couple of Parkinson's animal models, so like using the plant extract medication resurpene,
which I mentioned earlier in the Eldapa story. But apparently that drug blocks more neurotransmitters than just dopamines, so it wasn't It's not perfect for that, and that lack of really good animal models did severely limit Parkinson's disease research, especially before genetic models of disease were developed, and so researchers were always on the hunt for better tools, and they stumbled upon one in an unexpected place, the San
Jose County Jail OHKAY. In July nineteen eighty two, George Correo, who was in the San Jose County Jail on drug charges, woke up one morning unable to talk or move, but with his senses fully intact. He was admitted to the emergency room after his condition got worse and the doctors could not find out what was wrong. Reflex hammer no response, blunt pressure to fingernails, no response, ammonium sulfate smelling salts no response. Eventually he was transferred to the psychiatric ward
and diagnosed with catatonic schizophrenia. This was a diagnosis that stirred up some controversy among the hospital's doctors, with the neurologists arguing that it was a psychiatric disorder and the psychiatrists insisting insisting that it was neurologic. I have been in the middle of one of these debates. That's cool.
And then it was the head of neurology, Bill Langston, that got involved and decided to run a few more tests, the results of which convinced him that they were actually dealing with a mysterious neurological problem, so he had George transferred to the neurobehavior unit. After a few days there, a doctor noticed the slightest of movements from George's fingers, and so he placed a pencil in his hands with
a notepad underneath. After about thirty minutes, George had written his name along with quote, I'm not sure what is happening to me. I only know I can't function normally. I can't move right. I know what I want to do, it just won't come out right. And he wrote all of that. It took it took a while, but yeah, wow, yeah.
And so with this path of communication open, the doctors began taking a detailed, or as detailed as they could, medical history, which is how they learned that George had taken heroin, and that he had been with his girlfriend Juaniita Lopez before he had gotten sick. And when they found her, because they were like okay, you know, they were going to find out first of all if she was okay, but also what she knew, they found that she was in pretty much the same state that George
was in, motionless and rigid m hm. So then they cast a wider net around the town around the area and found more cases of people who were mysteriously frozen, six in total, including George and Juanita, and one of whom was a young woman who was diagnosed with hysterical paralysis. Wow. Yeah, The link between all of them was that they had
all taken heroin or what they thought was heroin. Okay, Testing of the substance that they had found in the apartment of one of these patients revealed that it wasn't actually heroin, but a designer drug synthesized in an underground lab and sold as heroin, And somehow this substance had induced the symptoms of Parkinson's disease in these young people in a matter of hours. What and because it looked
like Parkinson's, why not try al dopa. When they were given al dopa, they improved almost like almost immediately, gaining full control over their bodies, at least until the side effects started. But this improvement, sort of the treatment as part of the diagnosis, showed that something in that designer drug had crossed the blood brain barrier and destroyed the substantia nigra. How wow, what was this thing that did this?
The answer came from yet another unexpected source, a strange case study from the nineteen seventies, where a college student had used a home chemistry set to make his own drugs, namely MPPP, which, like, if I were to tell you what that stood for, it would be a lot of chemical names that don't mean anything to us, well probably to some listeners out there, but yeah not us. Yeah, give it a Google. But MPPP, in theory, gives a
heroin like high. And apparently this college student's experiments worked, or at least the first few batches did. A few months after starting, he injected himself with a batch and immediately felt a burning sensation and within a few days lost complete movement, becoming completely immobile and unable to speak.
And I don't know what happened to this guy, whether he eventually received any treatment, but his case eventually made it to the NIH, where they discovered that instead of making MPPP, he had made something called MPTP, which I can name this one out because I have written here one methyl for phenal one two three six tetra hydropyridine.
So yeah, MPTP. Turns out, the chemists that had made that designer drug in the nineteen eighties that had paralyzed those six people had also been trying to make MPPP but instead made MPTP. Okay, those individuals would never be the same, never fully recovering from the drug and struggling with motor complications for the rest of their lives, many of which were shortened. And it's an incredibly tragic story.
But if one good thing came out of it, it was that this situation ended up being a revolution for the field of Parkinson's disease research, because with the discovery of the effects of MPTP on the brain, researchers now had a potential cause for the condition, or could at least outline how an environmental contaminant such as an herbicide or pesticide could cross the blood brain barrier and cause
the disease. Secondly, and this is the huge part that I started this section with, they could now use MPTP to create the first animal models for Parkinson's disease, which could be used to test out treatments, study mechanisms, examine potential causes. The possibilities were endless. Wow. Yeah. Since the discovery of the effects of MPTP, the field of Parkinson's
disease research has come a tremendously long way. We've learned so much more about this disease and how to treat it, and this disease has also taught us so much about our own brains, unlocking movement pathways and reflexive actions by
looking at how they break down. We're also in the process of reframing this disease by incorporating symptoms that aren't movement related, something that is about as we've gotten better at diagnosing Parkinson's before the movement symptoms begin, which has also allowed people to conduct more precise and accurate clinical trials. We're expanding treatment options beyond the narrow dopamine focus, and
I'm super excited to learn more about those. But I think another huge aspect that has really grown in the past few decades is the incredible advocacy work done by people like Michael J. Fox. There can be such a stigma around neurodegenerative diseases, a huge one, including Parkinson's, and people like Michael J. Fox and the providers of our first hand account who share their experience and are open about it, have really done an immeasurable amount of good
in terms of humanizing this disease. And there's really just like so much more that we could talk about in terms of Parkinson's. So erin why don't you just cut me off here and tell me where we are today with this disease.
I will try to do just that right after this break. Parkinson's disease is incredibly common, It is a chronic condition, and it is very much on the rise. Yes, both the incidents and the prevalence have been increasing across the globe for the last several decades. And prevalence listeners may or may not recall. I feel like we throw this word around a lot. Prevalence is just how many people in a population are living with the disease at a
given time. It makes sense that prevalence is increasing because we're living longer. We're an aging global population, and Parkinson's disease is predominantly a disease of age. But the incidents, or the number of new cases that are diagnosed year after year, is also on the rise.
And this may.
Be partially but certainly not entirely explained by better diagnostic accuracy, especially because Parkinson's seems to be growing faster than other neurologic disorders for which we in some cases might have better or at least newer diagnostic accuracy, like MS for example. Overall, the global burden has more than doubled in the last couple of decades, and Parkinson's disease today is often recognized
as the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease. Okay, so it's like Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's as like the two most common neurodegenerative dementia causing diseases. Parkinson's is, of course found across the globe. Prevalence is perhaps higher in Europe, North America, South America when compared to Africa, Asia, and
countries in the Middle East. It's really difficult, I think, in cases like this to really get a sense of like, how true is this versus are places that tend to be higher income better at diagnosing this disease unlear But overall, this is a disease that is affecting millions and millions
of people. And like we mentioned in the biology section, while Parkinson's disease is not causing death outright, it does significantly reduce the length of a person's life, and the degree to which that is true varies a lot by
the time course of the illness. So if we think back to dividing Parkinson's into maybe three different subtypes, the kind of worse or diffuse malignant group, the intermediate group, and the kind of mild motor predominant group, the median survival after diagnosis in the diffuse malignant group in some studies is only eight years, which is really short, compared to thirteen years for the intermediate subtype and twenty for
a mild motor predominant subtype. Often, when we look at just all Parkinson's altogether, the median survival after diagnosis is between like six and fourteen years. The good news is that there is a lot being done about this disease, so much so one of the big hurdles right now in Parkinson's disease that we've mentioned a lot is that, because this is a clinical diagnosis, you have to have these signs and symptoms present, at least some of them
before somebody can be diagnosed. And these predominantly motor signs that are used are not the first signs of neurodegeneration.
There is this.
Prolonged, in some cases, very prolonged prodromal period before the onset of these symptoms, and that window, first of all, neurodegeneration is happening already. So if we can diagnose something earlier, we can potentially treat much better because we could potentially prevent the progression of disease. Right, So, could we diagnose Parkinson's earlier? And can we develop disease modifying treatments that actually work?
So those I.
Think, in like looking at all of the literature are the two biggest areas of research. Can we identify biomarkers to diagnose Parkinson's earlier and can we develop disease modifying treatments. We've made really big strides and we have so far to go. So just this year, a few months ago actually maybe a little over a month ago as of the time of recording, so by the time this is
released a few months ago. In the year twenty twenty three, a paper came out in Lancet Neurology that was the result of this really massive longitudinal study funded in large part by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, does a huge amount of funding for Parkinson's research, that in fact identified a potential biomarker of Parkinson's.
Ooh.
What they did was found a way to actually amplify and then identify abnormal alpha sin nucleon, that protein that makes up the large part of Louis bodies in the spinal fluid of people with Parkinson's, including people with only prodromal symptoms.
Wow.
So they were able to with a lumbar puncture detect this abnormal alpha sinnucleon in a way that could predict Parkinson's disease that was highly sensitive and specific.
This is huge. That is huge.
Yeah, so there is a biomarker.
Wow.
This is the first step to having a diagnostic test. It is not a diagnostic test. That is the caveat This is very very early days. We're not going to go around doing lumbar punctures on everyone with constipation, or everyone even with a rem sleep disorder or that has these prodromal signs or symptoms, and certainly not at the point of being able to test, for example, the general population or people with a family history or anything like that.
But this is the kind of breakthroughs in research that leads to the potential for these early diagnoses that can someday maybe even lead to screening tools that could be available, which is incredible. But then with this knowledge, this knowledge without a disease modifying therapy doesn't really do anything right. So the next step has to be disease modifying therapy because otherwise you're diagnosing something very early with nothing that you can do to treat it.
But there's a lot of research.
Being done on actually finding therapies that could change the course of disease.
It feels maybe this is my bias, but I feel like we've been on the precipice of discovering something that will halt Parkinson's disease progression for decades. Like it just feels like it's just around the corner and just out of reach, and like one more study, one more, we just need one more transformative breakthrough like we've had so often in the history of this disease.
I think that I agree. I think it's it's so disappointing that we're not there yet. I think because there have been a lot of studies that have tried a lot of different targets, and so far in terms of actually halting the progression, there really hasn't been any thing that has shown very much promise. There are a lot of studies underway. There are drugs that are targeting alphas and nucleon There are drugs that are targeting dopamine receptors.
There are even studies looking into using GLP one agonists, which are the drugs that are all the rage right now. They were developed as treatment for diabetes. They're also being used for weight loss. They're like the drugs that everyone's heard of.
We should do an episode on that.
Oh, definitely, there's we streched into whether these drugs could be beneficial in terms of Parkinson's disease modification.
There's a lot.
When I looked at clinicaltrials dot Gov, there are over two thousand, six hundred registered clinical trials if you search
for Parkinson's. Not all of these are drug trials, but over twenty three hundred of them are interventional trials of some kind, so it's a lot and the third avenue of research, in addition to biomarkers identifying disease early and disease treatment like changing the course of disease or slowing progression of disease, the third very interesting avenue of research that is separate but very closely related, is better following
this disease in terms of clinical progression. So Aarin, you sent me an article that was about wearable devices that can be used to track the movement of people with Parkinson's disease. So these devices in combination with machine learning
give us better resolution on progression of disease. There's other ones that look at speech pattern recognition and deep learning and AI machine learning things to be able to track the progression of Parkinson's disease in a very nuanced way, which is going to be a very important tool when we're trying to find disease modifying therapy because if we can better parse out what's working and what's not by better tracking the progression of this disease, then we're going
to be able to get a lot better data on what's working and what isn't and.
How yes, I didn't even think about that that aspect of it. That's huge for application. Yeah, exactly, exactly. Wow.
Cool, So there is a lot of hope on the horizon.
It does, it does feel very hopeful.
Yeah.
With that, if you'd like to read more, and there is a whole lot more sources, Yeah, I have a bunch, but I want to shout out one in particular, and it is a book titled Brainstorms, The Race to Unlock the Mysteries of Parkinson's Disease by John Paul Ferman. And I really really enjoyed this book. The author start to write this book because he had gotten to Parkinson's diagnosis and it was a really just excellent It was an excellent and informative read. Yeah, I recommend. Yeah.
I have a number of sources as well, but got to always shout out whenever the Lancet has a disease primer series is just golden.
Just makes my life so easy. So there was a few.
There was one from twenty fifteen and then there was an update in twenty twenty one. Both are just called Parkinson's Disease. They're great, like overall comprehensive reads. There was a really interesting paper from twenty twenty two called the Neuropsychiatry of Parkinson's Disease, Advances and Challenges from the Lancet Neurology, as well as papers on these biomarkers and other research
being done in terms of treatment. We will post the list of sources from this episode in all of our episodes on our website This podcast will Kill You dot Com under the episode's tab.
Thank you so much, Stacy for sharing your story with us, just truly from the bottom of our hearts.
Thank you, yeah, so so so much for sharing your story with us. Thank you to Bloodmobile for providing music for this episode and all of our episodes.
Thank you to Tom bry Fogel for the audio mixing. Thank you, thank you, Thank you to the Exactly Right Network, and thank you to you listeners. We hope that you learned something.
Yeah, I'm sure that you did something.
Yeah.
And thank you, as always to our patrons. We appreciate your support so very.
Much, so so much. Well, until next time, wash your hands you filed the Animals
