Why choose a sleep number smart bed? Can I make my side softer? Can I make my side firmer? Your sleep number's at it. It's the sleep number. Everything smart bed says. Med and Base are on sale during our Memorial Day. 50% off, plus free home delivery. and leave a sleep number store near you. Ben Cohen moved to Vermont in 1977 and co-founded an ice cream company that bears his name, Ben & Jerry.
They made great ice cream. They still do. Ben Cohen became famous for his liberal political activism. The ice cream was great. His political opinions were deeply offensive to most conservatives. Fast forward to 2022, and Ben Cohen was one of the only liberals in the United States to come out against the war in Ukraine. It seems like a good moment to pause and reconsider whether some of Ben Cohen's views on war are maybe not insane. Maybe they're worth hearing.
So you brought a book by Smedley Darlington Butler, the most decorated Marine in world. He's a Marine general. He won two medals of honor. And he wrote a book called War is a Racket. And for some reason, it's not the most famous book ever written in English, but it probably should be. What is that and why did you bring it? Well, I've been kind of inspired by this quote of his, I think. He... he encapsulates...
what's been going on in terms of how our military has been used. He's been there, done that. That's for sure. And I think about it a lot in terms of You know, all these refugees, immigrants that are trying to get to the U.S. Why are they trying to get to the U.S.? A lot of times it's because the U.S. at some point in history overthrew or invaded their government or... Well, I'll tell you what Smedley says here. Can I quote? Please.
So he says, I spent 33 years and four months in active military service, and during that period, I spent most of my time as a high-class muscle man for big business, for Wall Street, and the bankers. Butler wrote in 1955, Then he goes on, in short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico safe for American oil interests. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for national city bank boys to collect revenues.
I helped in the raping of a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902 to 1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interest in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927, I helped set it up so that standard oil went on its way unlisted.
Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate in three city districts. We marines operated on three continents. So this was a major general in the United States Marine Corps, the single most decorated Marine when he wrote that. And I think he's pretty much forgotten. Yeah. And he was much maligned after he said that. Yeah, very much. So you think, I guess, in another way of saying you think that our military heroes are the...
most revered people in our country. You can't criticize a man who's received two medals of honor, and yet he crossed the line, and they hated him for that. Yeah, but he told the truth. So how is that relevant to right now? I think that those actions that the U.S. has done over the years back in his time and pretty much continues to do to essentially... run the world in a way that benefits the elites in the United States.
ends up causing a lot of resentment ends up being the cause of a lot of wars ends up being the cause of a lot of immigration and people trying to flee countries that are economically or politically unlivable. And if you go back to the root causes, you find out that there were some great liberation struggles in these countries, and the U.S. was on the other side. What's interesting is that Spendley, General Butler, wrote that years after he left the Marine Corps.
He was a hero in World War I when we were working to stop the Kaiser. Many Americans killed to stop the Kaiser. No one even remembers what a Kaiser is. But that was a war. The first World War was a war for... for democracy and freedom. It didn't work, of course. But we're hearing the same slogans now with Ukraine. And as then, a lot of really decent, good-hearted people with the right motives are buying it completely. It's not just warmongers who are in favor of these wars. It's like...
your next door neighbor who's a good person. Yeah, I think that's really true. The way a lot of people see it is This little country, Ukraine, got invaded by this big giant, Russia. But I think what you need to understand is what provoked that war and how it could have been prevented. At the end of the Cold War, the U.S. made promises to Russia that they're not going to expand NATO eastward. We proceeded to expand NATO eastward, as a matter of fact. The government was not going to do that.
Until the weapons manufacturers set up this committee to expand NATO, which was essentially the CEOs of the weapons manufacturers. lobbying Congress to expand NATO. So, I mean, geez, if you're a weapons manufacturer and you expand NATO, they're going to buy a lot of your stuff. Well, first let me ask, do you think it's a reasonable request by Russia not to have NATO expand to its borders? Yeah, absolutely. I mean, in the same way that the United States says that
What? There's our sphere of influence. Yeah. You know, I remember learning about this in, what was it, elementary school or middle school, the Monroe Doctrine. It's our divine right from God to control our hemisphere. To control our hemisphere. And it sounded crazy to me then. And, you know, I can see making sure that there's not enemies right on your borders. But in terms of controlling the whole hemisphere, I don't buy it. And the US has now expanded its sphere of influence to include...
entire world. I mean, it's amazing. We have military commands that cover every portion of the globe. and we have 800 military bases around the world you know as when i was growing up uh you know i heard we had a bunch of overseas bases i figured you know that's cool you know every country must have overseas bases And then I find out that the country who has the next most overseas bases has like five. I mean, it's the U.S.
that is using its military power to control the world. And the fact of the matter is that the United States is 5% of the world population. So having 5% dominate the world militarily, that doesn't sound democratic to me. And it doesn't sound like it helps the United States very much. No, I think it's incredibly harmful to the United States. First of all, We're making a lot of enemies. People don't like us being the big bully on the hill telling all these other countries what to do. And it sucks.
huge amount of money out of our country. It's stuff that can be used for things that people really want and need. we could have more affordable housing. We could make it so that the American dream could actually still happen, that people could afford a house. that you can get a decent education.
and that you can get childcare, that it doesn't have to cost you so much money to go to college. I mean, these things can all be done, and most other developed countries are providing that for their citizens. But the U.S. chooses to spend, I mean, look at this. This is a chart of the federal discretionary budget. That's the amount of money that Congress has each year to allocate to the various departments. So the big red one on top. That gets over half. That's the Pentagon.
And these little slivers are like, you know, USAID, the education department, the health department, community development, whatever else the country does. In terms of stuff that would actually be helpful to people living in their daily lives. it's all sucked out by the Pentagon. Martin Luther King gave this speech and he talked about The Pentagon being this huge demonic sucking tube that sucks out the lifeblood of...
Things like housing, schools, you know, everybody's school budget is always in the red or can't raise enough money, got to get rid of teachers or whomever. I think that's when they shot him is when he said that. The race stuff was fine. That was no problem. That's true. It is true. That was the end of his career. He was assassinated a year to the day after he made that speech. A year to the day? To the day. April 4th, 1967, he must have given that speech. Amazing. Wow, that's amazing. Yeah.
The people in charge, I am convinced, would like Americans to hate each other on the basis of race. They don't want you to talk about the banks or the Pentagon. I think that's really true. I think it is true. Back to Ukraine, you said that there was an association of weapons manufacturers that were lobbying Congress to expand NATO. It seems a little bit crazy that weapons manufacturers would be allowed to dictate foreign policy because the conflict is so obvious. Well, it's just money.
They're lobbying. They're giving political donations to the legislators, legalized bribery. Yeah, it's definitely a conflict of interest. So that, the pie, if I were to look at it, if you didn't tell me what country that was, and you said, here's a country that spends... more than half of its entire discretionary budget on weapons and troops, I would imagine a small country surrounded by enemies.
I would not imagine a continental-sized country with totally independent resources, enough energy, enough food, doesn't really need anything, that's separated from the rest of the world by the two biggest oceans. Yeah. That doesn't make any sense, actually. No, it totally doesn't. Has the U.S. been invaded before by a foreign army since 1812? I don't think so. No? No. Yeah. It's a little weird. Yeah. I mean, and they keep on justifying these huge expenditures by coming up with
Enemy after enemy after enemy. So, you know, first it was the Soviet Union. So the Soviet Union collapsed. And I mean, Gorbachev said at the time, we will deny you of an enemy. And, you know, I assumed that the Pentagon budget was going to drop hugely because that was the whole justification for it. What the Pentagon did was that they came up with what was called the two war scenario so now instead of the pentagon budget being structured to uh defeat the Soviet Union.
Now what they said is it needs to be structured to fight. two medium-sized wars in two different places at the same time, and what do you know, that's going to cost just as much as we were spending on preparing to fight the Soviet Union. Who are the wars going to be with? Well, I think at the time there was the axes of evil. What was that? Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Cuba. Probably another one. Yeah, it's interesting because...
Russia collapses, the Soviet system collapses after seven years in 1991, the summer of 91. And I kind of assumed, I think everyone assumed that we would take the wind. We were having this Cold War all these years, and they collapsed, we won, and then we could be friends and move forward because there are no more... Soviet communists left, they're gone. Right, and they wanted to be our friend. I mean, I was walking on the Arbat in Moscow. People were joyful, and they were all wearing these
pins that showed a U.S. flag crossed with a Soviet flag. They wanted to be friends. Why didn't that happen? Because our cold warriors, who for their whole life fighting the Soviet Union, that's what they were about. They wanted to continue the Cold War. They wanted to continue having Russia as this enemy. So fast forward to 2022. February, and the conflict in Ukraine starts, and we're told that this is just out of nowhere. Who could have known?
And Putin wants to expand the Russian border all the way to Vienna or all the way to London or who knows. But he's just an expansionist power. He's Hitler. And Ukraine is like the backstop against his expansionism. And we need to fight Russia. You're saying that that's not actually what happened? Right. Starting with the end of the Cold War, there was a promise made to Russia that kind of in exchange for I think it was taking down the wall in Germany that
we're not going to expand NATO eastward. Yes. And I think it was James Baker, the Secretary of State, that made that promise. And then... We proceeded to expand it eastward. There was one tranche of countries, and Russia was up in arms, and they objected in the most strenuous language. But we did it. And then we added more countries a bunch of years later, and Russia was up in arms, objected in the most strenuous language.
And, you know, there might have been a few more. And then there was a statement that Ukraine was going to become part of NATO. And Russia objected in the most strenuous language. And then... Russia started gathering some troops on the border and again said in the most strenuous language that we will not tolerate having Ukraine part of NATO.
We want to negotiate. They sent overtures to the US. I think the US did not respond. We ignore you if we don't like you. We don't talk to you if we don't like you. and then and then they invaded and I don't think they anticipated that they were going to end up in a proxy war with the United States. And what's crazy about it, what drives me crazy, is that...
This is war. War. I mean, we're, you know, I'm shooting my machine gun at you. You're dying. You're dead. Hundreds of thousands of people on both sides have died in this war. what I mean eventually the war is going to be over and there's going to be some settlement and why can't we just skip to that stage well because you don't expend missiles doing that. I really do think that's what it's about. You know, that's what Smedley Butler came up with. I mean, you read the whole rest of his book.
And he says at the end, you know, these anti-war protesters, they're really good people. You're never going to stop the military, industrial, congressional complex until you take the profit out of it. That's what's driving all this shit, is the profit that these corporations are making on making... Weapons. which are more and more lethal.
Here's a fact of life you may not learn until you're older, but I'm going to tell you now. It's very hard to have a good time if you're wearing bad boots. In fact, it may be impossible, and that's why you need to COVID. As a matter of fact, you don't just need them, you owe them to yourself. Tecovas makes Western boots for everybody. Ranchers, real ranchers, lifelong cowboys, first-time boot buyers, and anyone in between.
Every Tecova's boot is handcrafted, made by hand, with over 200 meticulous steps for a broken in feel right out of the box. You don't have to compromise between looks and quality. You can have them both. Whether it's a long day or a big night, Tecovas are built to last and impressed. You wouldn't believe the compliments people here get when they wear them out, which they do.
Right now, get 10% off at tecovas.com slash tucker when you sign up for email and text alerts. That's 10% off at tecovas.com slash tucker. Tucker says it best. The credit card companies are ripping Americans off and enough is enough. This is Senator Roger Marshall of Canada. Our legislation, the Credit Card Competition Act, would help end the grip Visa and MasterCard have on us.
Every time you use your credit card, they charge you a hidden fee called a swipe fee, and they've been raising it without even telling you. This hurts consumers and every small business owner. In fact, American families are paying $1,100 in hidden swipe fees each year.
The fees, Visa, and MasterCard charge Americans are the highest in the world, double candidates, and eight times more than Europe's. That's why I've taken action, but I need your help to help get this passed. I'm asking you to call your senator.
and demand they pass the Credit Card Competition Act. Paid for by the Merchants Payments Coalition. Not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee. www.merchantspaymentscoalition.com So Smedley Butler, I know you know this, I think he first gave that speech in 1935-ish. And he was later kind of lumped in with bad people as somehow pro-Nazi. He must be for Hitler. you know, it was like the worst slander you could level against somebody. And that's why he's forgotten now.
Something very similar seems to be going on, where if you say what you just said, you're pro-Putin. Yeah, which is bullshit. I'm not pro Putin. I'm not pro Zelensky. I'm pro peace. I'm pro ceasefire. I'm pro stop killing each other. So you've been that way. I mean... We're coming from different points of view, but we agree, strive, agree strong with everything you've said.
But you're the one who's been saying the same thing for a long time, like ever since for the 40 years I've been eating your ice cream, which is fattening. Sorry, I hate to say it. Thank you for consuming. You wear it well. I've got to stop eating that stuff. I always say never trust a skinny ice cream. And excuse me, so I've been listening to your views on this for a long time, and they haven't changed. Do you think your views have changed?
No, my view hasn't changed, and Bernie's views certainly haven't changed. I've been listening to him for a long time. I tell you, it is the same freaking speech. People say you should change your speech. He says, When the country finally acts in a decent way, I'll change my speech. But Ukraine feels a little different. All of a sudden, there was always this.
persistent, enthusiastic, anti-war caucus on the left, where you're coming from. Not quite mainstream Democrat, but sort of a more real-fashioned Democrat. They like evaporated. Maybe Chris Hedges, Jeff Sachs, Jeffrey Sachs, you, like, where's everybody else? Yeah, it really split, I guess, people. I mean you're talking about people on the left. I guess we could talk about people on the left. I mean, anti-war people in general.
Yeah, whatever they are, left, right, I don't know. Yeah, I think there's people like that on the left, right, and center. That's 100% true. You're exactly right, and in fact, There are a lot of them on the right, whatever that is. I don't even know. Those are fake categories at this point. It really is. But let's say it was 1985, okay?
It was 40 years ago, or 1988, when I lived in Burlington. That was considered like a lefty view. Yeah, yeah. So you're saying, right, so some of that group is, behind Ukraine let's defend Ukraine and some of that group is saying no we shouldn't be involved in this war I think the people who are saying, let's defend Ukraine, I can certainly understand it from their point of view. And their point of view is that...
Russia made an unprovoked invasion and Russia therefore started this war and they're trying to take over this country and we should defend that country. But people don't understand what led up to it. I mean, as a matter of fact, with the Eisenhower Media Network, this group of retired admirals, generals, and colonels, we took out a full-page ad in the New York Times at the very beginning of that war.
calling for a ceasefire. And the headline of the ad was supposed to be the U.S. provoked the war on Ukraine. And the New York Times would not allow us to run it as an ad. What? They would not allow us to use that headline. Why? But it's an ad. Right. Doesn't seem right, but I mean, so that was on that thing, but I mean...
In the run-up to the... So this is another... I don't think North Korea has a propaganda initiative as comprehensive and aggressive as the one I saw after the Ukraine war started. It was just like... New York Open was taking Russian names off the scoreboard. New York Times was editorializing in other people's advertisements. What was that? Yeah. War fever? I mean, the reality is that...
you can kind of control what the population thinks by the information that you give to them. So, you know, the U.S. is propagandizing its own people you know every country does that but you know there's a lot of sins of omission in terms of the news that people get. You never hear Russia's point of view. I mean... It's amazing to me. you know they wouldn't let us hear what osama bin laden was saying after you know 9 11 i noticed i mean they don't let us hear what uh
The people in China are saying, I mean, you know, so I dug around. A friend of mine sent me, you know, a speech by the defense minister of China. And he's saying. We're not looking to be enemies with the U.S. We're looking to develop our country and grow. We can peacefully coexist together. The world is big enough for both of the U.S.
The explicit policy of the united states if you read these i mean i don't know what the hell is this ice cream guy doing reading these national security documents i don't know but anyhow i read them and uh It is the policy of the US to maintain hegemony. And I didn't know what that word meant. But it's the policy of the US that if any country begins to develop economically or socially, you know, toward the level that the US is at.
That country is by definition an enemy. The policy of the U.S. is that we must have full spectrum dominance. Why should 5% of the world control what's going on in the world? The Eisenhower Institute. Eisenhower Media Network. Media Network. My apologies. so I've never heard of it. Yeah, I didn't think you had. Well, I sort of pay attention to this. That's okay, most people haven't. No, I'm admitting that, both because I want to be honest, but also because
it tells you a lot. So this was a group you were involved in that had flag officers and had generals, admirals, other officers who worked at the Pentagon, worked at the military. And I've never heard of it. That's kind of interesting. What kind of people were in it? What was the goal? Well, originally... during the cold war and after there was the center for defense information which was a home for retired high-level military officers that were critical of the Pentagon.
that organization kind of fell on hard times and kind of twittered away. So myself and a veteran, Danny Serson, Decided to start up the Eisenhower Media Network as a home for... higher level former military people to use their credibility. on the issue of critiquing the Pentagon, because what usually happens when you critique the Pentagon is that you don't have the credentials. You know, you say that, well, the Pentagon is doing this weird thing or that screwed up thing.
And, you know, and then the Pentagon, you know, general gets up there in uniform with all his medals and stuff and says, You know, those guys have no idea what they're talking about. I'm the military expert. So the idea of Eisenhower Media Network is to have those military experts that can support. a different point of view than what the Pentagon is putting out. What kind of response have you had for the media?
Those guys are in the media sometimes, but they're certainly not in the media despite our efforts as much as the former... high-level military guys that are now being paid by weapons manufacturers. I mean, so they're brought on these TV shows, TV talk shows as experts. and they're never identified as in the employ of essentially war profiteers. That's actually happened? I speak the truth. I shit you not. I mean, that's disgusting. Yes, sir.
I've known a number of them, of course, because I worked at a TV channel. I worked at a bunch of TV channels with a bunch of retired military officers. you know, on the air letting their expertise to this or that and some of them are impressive, some of them are utterly fraudulent and stupid. I'm thinking of one in particular who doesn't know anything. I don't know how he was a general, but sorry.
I didn't realize they were being paid by defense contractors to do that. That's really... And it's not revealed. Oh, I didn't know them, and I know them. Right. Huh. So who was in the Eisenhower Media Network or is in it? What kind of people? Larry Wilkerson. He was a former assistant to Colin Powell. I remember him well. Matt Ho Dennis Fritz. He was the head of Space Force, actually, for a while. Are these older guys, younger guys?
We have a range, I'm happy to say. How hard is it for them to join a group like that? It seems like one of the structural problems is that if you're a one-star and you fail to make two-star, you just seamlessly move over to the defense. industry to a weapons manufacturer. There's like a place for you. Yeah. I mean, especially for the guys with even more stars. Exactly. Right? So the higher you go, the more you make when you leave.
So the incentive doesn't end with your military service. You get paid after you leave. Exactly, and you get paid by the corporations whose contracts you were supposedly supervising. when you were in uniform. So when you were making ice cream, would you ever allow a contract set up like that to exist in your company? Never. Never. I mean, the conflicts of interest that go on in terms of our government would be illegal in a publicly held corporation. They'd be illegal. Yeah.
Yeah, I'm asking these dumb questions because I feel like I'm maybe missing something. So the guys who have signed up, the retired officers who signed up for the Eisenhower media project are turning down a lot of money in order to do that. Yeah, absolutely. And what's their view, would you say? Do they believe that these conflicts are driven by profit? Well, they're driven by profit. Sometimes they're driven by... Politicians. not wanting to appear so-called weak on defense. And...
The only way we judge whether a politician is weak on defense or not is how much money they are willing to give to the Pentagon. So you have two politicians that are running for election. And usually they're trying to out-compete the other guy in terms of who's willing to raise the Pentagon budget. Because I'm strong on defense. So this is like the one area of bipartisan agreement. Let's give more and more money to the Pentagon. And there's this other aspect of so-called political engineering.
Earlier, I don't know, back in the 90s, I guess, military contractors... would these weapons manufacturers would deliberately spread out the jobs for a particular weapon system in as many congressional districts as possible. And... So, you know, that creates jobs and, you know, the politician from that area, that's what they, you know, that gives them a lot of credit. Of course. I brought jobs to my district. And so... For, say, the F-35, it's probably made in over 400 congressional districts.
And, you know, if you try to say this is a shitty airplane, which, you know, John McCain said it was the worst thing he ever saw. you can't stop it because they've politically engineered it. I don't know. That's kind of how it works. So when you tried to put this ad in the New York Times, or did put the ad with a different headline, what did they change the headline to? I don't remember. But something that didn't tell the truth about how this war started. Well, the...
The body did. Yeah. The body comment. Yeah, they're assuming most people read the headline. Right, right, right. Nobody was saying anything like that then. That's right. I know. I was saying it. Got in a lot of trouble for it. Yeah, it just seemed obvious to me. But very few people were saying anything like that. What kind of response did you get from people you know? Mostly positive. And there were a bunch that disagreed. You know, I actually have my wife.
was born in Kyrgyzstan, which is one of the countries that the Soviet Union had kind of taken over. She's never lived in Russia, but she's a Russian speaker. Yes. And... She lost some friends because of the stand that I took against that war in Ukraine. Really? Because they were offended. Yeah, yeah. You know, I think for... For countries that are located around the borders of the Soviet Union, countries that had been invaded by the Soviet Union. And mistreated. Right.
they are really down on Russia. For sure, they are. and they're very down on socialism, and they're very down on... And they believe. They have a history. They've been invaded. And they're scared that they're going to get invaded. You know, and... Their feeling is, if we just let Russia go and have its way with Ukraine, that they're going to be next. Of course. And I don't think there is any truth to that. I think, you know, clearly Putin is not.
doing very well invading one country. I don't think he's looking to go invade another one. He already runs the biggest country in the world. I agree with that. praise of Putin to note that there's no evidence he wants territorial expansion at all. Were there any politicians, so that was like in the first few months after the war started that you said this. Yeah. Were there any politicians who were saying anything like that that you saw?
That's interesting. I don't really remember any politicians being on our side. No. including ones you knew personally and had supported in the past. They weren't saying that. So that raises the question. And some of those politicians, because you've always been against war for the 40 years I've paid attention. you were supporting anti-war politicians, but they made an exception for Ukraine. Yeah, that's true. I noticed. What was that about?
Maybe because there was so much public... kind of empathy for the people in Ukraine. And I think that... a lot of it has to do with what information do people have. The only information people had is Russia came in and invaded with its army. And they didn't hear what happened before, what led up to it. And they didn't think about You know, which this ad that we ran did. What would the U.S. do if... if there were Russian missiles lined up along the Mexican border aimed at the U.S.
I mean, it is the same situation. Of course it is. And I've got no question that the U.S. would invade and get rid of them. Of course. We'd be occupying Tijuana right now. Yeah. And I can see why, by the way. You don't want other people's missiles aimed from your border. That's pretty close. Yeah, yeah. You don't want to think something bad is going to happen, but you've got to take precautions in case it does. And that's why you insure your car and your phone and, of course, your house.
but what about your life what about your family's future do you have life insurance you might not because it's expensive and it's hard to deal with it's hard to get And that's what policy genius does. It makes it easy and cheap. And you're able to give your loved ones peace of mind where you two exit unexpectedly. So you use Policy Genius to find life insurance policies that start for just $276 a year in exchange for which your family gets a million dollars in coverage.
$276 a year, a million dollars in coverage. So that's a very easy way to protect the people you love and feel good about the future. How does it work? Well, Policy Genius combines digital tools with expertise, actual licensed agents who you speak to directly. You don't waste hours sitting around on hold.
You talk to people right away. You get your options clearly, concisely, and then you get along with your life. So you can check life insurance off your to-do list with Policy Genius. It's super fast. You head to policygenius.com slash Tucker. Click the link in the description to... pair various life insurance quotes for free from top companies and see how much you could save. That's policygenius.com slash Tucker. Interesting. So did... you have access to information other people didn't?
Well... Because you said that most people had this view because they didn't know better because they didn't have access. to other perspectives, to the truth, to the history of this. What were you reading that they weren't? I've just been following the issue over time since. since the fall of the, you know, since the end of the Cold War. You know, so, yeah, so where do I get the information? Well, the stuff about the committee to expand NATO, that was in the mainstream press.
But you already had the framework for understanding this because you've been paying attention to this issue. Yeah, and you think about most people. It's kind of a luxury to have the time to pay attention to an issue like this. I mean, most people are you know focused on the day-to-day yeah you know just trying to get through the day and um yeah you know you the messages that you get are essentially the messages that the government wants you to get.
And that was not the way it was supposed to work. No, it wasn't. We were supposed to have freedom of the press. But I mean, even when there, I guess even when there was a free press, it was still... very controlled i mean so i say there was a free press Not that free. I think a lot of times the press is self-censoring. Yes. I don't know. How can you have a democracy without free access to information?
Yeah, I don't think you can. Um... I mean, now, you know, with the internet, I mean, you could say that there is free access, but you really need to kind of dig. You get a very different perspective if you read the news in the U.S. versus if you read the news in some other country in the world, talking about the same situation. Um... So we get a US-centric...
U.S. government-centric. Yeah, yeah. I don't know. I don't personally know anyone who's volunteering to fight Russia and Ukraine. I don't personally know anybody. I've never met anybody. outside of DC who wants another Middle Eastern war.
So, in other words, the priorities of the government bear no resemblance to the priorities of the population. Yes. There are well done, rigorous... put studies on that issue that you know you look at the the line of What do regular old people in the country want versus what does the country do? and they're not congruent very much. Then you look at the line of What do?
the elites want, what do the really wealthy people and corporations want, and what does the country do, and it's much more aligned. So on Ukraine, your position, I'll just be totally blunt, is like totally unfashionable. It's like the least fashionable position you could ever take. Yeah, well, I was never really a fashion maiden. But this is anti-fashion. This is a way to get called really pretty slanderous names.
it's a way to break up friendships. As you said, your wife lost friends over this. So it's like, why would you do that? Why not just sit this one out? Do I want... Well, I don't know. It's about standing up for what you believe in. mean I'm for a ceasefire You know, you would think...
Most people would be in favor of a ceasefire. I mean, we don't want to keep on killing people. I'm not a Putin supporter. I'm not a Zelensky supporter. I'm a supporter of not... not killing each other and not using our resources to to have actual wars, to supply weapons for wars, or to settle our problems through that means. It just... Why can't we cut to the chase and assume the war is over?
And have a negotiated settlement. Why do we have to kill a few hundred thousand mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, sons and daughters? in the process. There's also a sense in which there's like a suicidal impulse at work here because for most of three years we were closer than we've ever been to a nuclear conflict.
like an exchange of nuclear warheads where most of the Earth's population dies. That's factually true, I think. And I think the planners of the Pentagon understood that, and they pressed forward anyway. Do you think that the average American understands how close we have been to nuclear war? No. I think they've heard that we've been close, but they don't have the details.
Why do you think that people who plan these things and push these things don't seem to care about the risk of annihilating everyone on the planet? I think most people involved in the process are not... are playing little roles in the process. They're just trying to do their small part well. Yes. And, And... They're not. you know, they're not looking at the bigger pick. I think that's exactly right.
They're just cogs. Yeah. But the machine itself is moving towards something awful, but they don't have that picture. They just know their role. Yeah. You said there are no politicians who are saying what you believe. Who's opinion on this do you respect on the Rushy Crane question? Larry Wilkerson, Jeff Sachs. Yes. Um, I guess those are the two that come to mind.
So given that you were, I think we're right about Russia, Ukraine, clearly if there had been a ceasefire in the spring of 2022, you know, probably a million people would still be alive and Ukraine wouldn't be destroyed and we'd still be in the same place. So like, why didn't we do that? given that you called that correctly, I think, where do you think we're going in Iran? It sounds like we're kind of headed toward war. Why do you think that is?
Well, there seems to be some kind of... A strange relationship between Israel and the U.S. I don't know, Israel now has the U.S. supplying weapons for its genocide and and what I'm told is that Israel wants some concept of greater Israel I mean I don't really know much about that Do you think the US faces a threat from Iran? No, I don't. No, I think that's absurd. I think, you know, Iran has a Pentagon budget. Well, not a Pentagon. Their military budget is like seven billion dollars.
Our Pentagon budget is darn close to a trillion. So... I don't think that, I mean, what, is Iran going to invade the U.S.? I don't think so. why you sold your company. It was bought by Unilever, I think like 25 years ago. Did you consider buying a vineyard? No. No. How about you? No, I can't afford a vineyard. No vineyard. I don't even drink, so kind of out of the vineyard business. But why did you decide to spend the last 25 years on the issue of war?
It's more on the issue of... kind of the the spirit and the soul of our country uh You know, there was a pope who said that even if the weapons are never used, the arms race kills the poor by causing them to starve. I'm amazed at how much money the United States has. we have a shitload of money. Is that a technical assessment? Yeah. We have enough money to solve health problems for people in our country and all over the world. We have enough to
end hunger in our country and all over the world. We have enough to get rid of lead poisoning. the gargantuaness of the amounts of money that we have You can't fathom it. And we're choosing to spend it on creating more and better ways to kill more and more people. It's such an incredible waste. You know, I believe that we are all interconnected. As we help others, we actually help ourselves. And...
All this money that's going into the Pentagon is sucking money out of things that people really want and need. It could be improving your libraries, your schools, your sports arenas. It could be paying for college for your kids, trade school for your kids. You have a better car. I mean, what is it that... What do people want? It's not more weapons. No, it's not. And our country needs to start measuring its strength by...
how many people it can help as opposed to how many people it can kill. And I would say it would actually make our country more secure. Okay, so it's time for an intervention. All your loved ones are here. We're here to tell you it is time to stop overpaying for your phone. Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, there's a way better way.
To do this is called Pure Talk. Pure Talk is a wireless company created by Americans for Americans. It offers reliable coverage, excellent service, and it's the smart way to cut costs without giving up quality. Qualifying plans start at just $35 a month. You get unlimited talk, taxed, 15 gigs of data, a mobile hotspot,
on the most dependable 5G network in the United States. And if you join today, they throw in a Samsung Galaxy for free, actually for free. There's no weird hidden fees or charges that you don't see at first. legitimately free, no dollars. So do yourself a favor, cut your cell phone bill in half, at least with Pure Talk. Go to puretalk.com slash Tucker to claim your free Galaxy Samsung phone with a qualifying plan. We can tell you it's a good deal and you'll be happy you did it.
You saw people just as recently as a few months ago say, we actually benefit from sending billions to Ukraine because that money goes first through American companies. Right. I've heard politicians say that Yeah, this is great, man. We're employing our people. We're keeping our weapons production lines humming. And we're degrading the military of... enemy Russia and it is such sacrilegious reasoning You need to think about our spirit and our soul, what it means to be an American.
Right now, what it means to be American is that we are the world's largest arms exporter. We have the largest military in the world. We support the slaughter of people in Gaza. If somebody protests the slaughter of people in Gaza, we arrest them. What does our country stand for? I don't know. I mean, you know, people say the budget is a moral document. See where you're spending your money and that's what your values are. It hurts me to say that the values of our country seem to be...
Military domination. That's that. The impulse that drives this is money, right? People want money. So you're an interesting person to ask since you didn't grow up rich. You've had times when you were poor, then you got rich, selling the best ice cream there is. So you've kind of seen the money thing from both ends. Do you think that people put too much emphasis on money? well part of what got me uh interested in this issue is that you know you talk about these large numbers like
300 million. 500 million. A billion. 100 billion. $800 billion. Nobody has any idea what the size of that is. It's just like more money than you could ever imagine. I have no perspective at all on that. When Ben & Jerry's was sold, it came up to a level of $300 million in sales. And so I started having a feeling for how much money that is. And then I realized that three times that, that's about a billion. And so I vaguely got a handle on... what quantity that is. And, you know, a billion is...
An unfathomably large number. If you counted every second since you were born. you would be 32 years old before you'd lived a billion seconds. It is a lot of seconds. And that's just one billion. So the Pentagon budget is now a trillion. A thousand billion. You know, when you, in Pentagon speak, well, I don't know, it's a few aircraft carriers, it's another fighter jet, generation of fighter jets. Whatever, whatever. But in regular speak,
Here's a good example. I wrote it down because I thought you might be asking. There was recently a fighter jet that fell off an aircraft carrier. so it was a 70 million dollar fighter jet so You know, that sounds kind of dramatic that, you know, a $70 million fighter jet fell off an aircraft carrier. But if you think about the Pentagon budget as a box of Cheerios, that $70 billion would be one-tenth of one Cheerio.
which is enough money if you take it out of the Pentagon to build two new hospitals in West Virginia. So what's crumbs to the Pentagon can really provide some real stuff that we need here in the U.S. Why? So you're describing a system that basically can't be changed? No, I'm in the process of changing it. So you think that democratic levers still work in a non-democratic system? Well... I think that the only lever that works is public opinion. So...
I'm in the process of starting up campaign which is called common sense defense at the moment we're going to get a flashier name later but right now it's common sense that's pretty flashy thank you common sense defense yeah be a nice change
And it is a campaign that's aimed just directly at the public. We're not trying to lobby Congress. We're not trying to influence that. We're trying to... change public opinion in terms of what we want our government to be spending its money on or at least not spending its money on excessive weapons. Yeah, so... Yeah, I believe that the thing that can change it, and this is from my experience of my time going around lobbying on Capitol Hill.
about this issue you know I think that's hopeless I mean I think all we can do is We think it's hopeless to lobby the Congress. Yeah. You know, hopeless for a guy who's not handing out hundreds of thousands of dollars. What was your experience? You actually went to Washington and talked to them? I went to Washington and I talked to those politicians, you know.
They smile and they say nice things and they take a picture and then they just vote and rubber stamp whatever Pentagon bill comes in because They don't want their opponent to call them weak on defense. So there were none that you would trust. I wouldn't say that. You know, I think there's a guy, you know, there's, no, I wouldn't say there's none. I mean, I think there's, I don't know. 20, 30. Yeah.
Do you think that part of the problem with the Ukraine war was Trump was against it? And that made it hard for people who hated Trump to say, I'm against it too? I wasn't I don't really know about that. I mean, I wasn't conscious of that myself. I mean, I know that. I know that for some Democrats, anything that Trump supports, they don't. But I'm not aware of that as being an issue related to the Ukraine war.
You were saying that you think there's something sacrilegious about basic and economy on weapons? Yeah, I really do. So are you driven by your spiritual beliefs? I'm mostly driven by... Just a concern for people. I mean, I don't... in terms of a spiritual belief. I mean, I don't practice a religion. I was born a Jew. I love Jesus Christ. I think the words that he said are, wonderful are amazing uh and uh I'm kind of distressed that a lot of organized Christian religions are not really...
I don't know, abiding by the words of Jesus Christ. I am too. I'm friends with a guy named Shane Claiborne, who's a theologian. A Christian, well, he calls himself a red-letter Christian, and he's got a group called Red Letter Christians. There's other theologians. Red letters refer to the red letters of the New Testament, connoting Jesus' words. Exactly.
and he lives and works in an inner city of Philadelphia in a really low income area and he's that's his work he's working to help people there but yeah I I think if we could follow the words of Jesus Christ and think about the Sermon on the Mount. you know, take his word seriously, we wouldn't be doing the stuff we're currently doing. No. I don't know if I can improve on that. Ben Cohen thank you very much. We want to thank you. things that actually matter to
Follow us on Spotify and hit the bell. We appreciate it. Thanks for watching.