The Plot Against Trump with Kash Patel

in the administrative state, essentially attempted a coup against Donald Trump, when we had our own government trying to go against a dually elected president, of trying to essentially bury a dually elected president. We think about how many calls with foreign leaders were leaked, one of them with Ukraine, with President's Lensky was the basis of an impeachment against President Trump. Why don't we see those same calls leaked with Joe Biden.

All you have to do is listened to him speak for two seconds to realize the kind of crazy coming out of his mouth, or we honestly to believe that he is not saying all sorts of crazy things. The foreign leaders that's if his handlers even let him on phone calls with foreign leaders. But it's all such bogus.

It's the double standard that we're also used to. The fact that someone like Peter Navarro was arrested for contempt of Congress from January six committee, but Hillary Clinton's campaign lawyer Michael Sussman was acquitted of lying to the FBI. So this double standard that we've all sadly gotten accustomed to, but we should continue to fight. So that's what we're gonna do today. Right We're gonna revisit Russia Gate with

Cash Patel. You guys know him very well. He's out with a new book called The Plot Against the King. It's a children's book that really explains what happened with the Russia Gate, also just talking about things like due process and the importance of getting to the truth. Cash was the former chief of staff to the Defense Secretary at the time, Christopher Miller, who was the acting Defense Secretary.

He also previously worked as um the Deputy Assistant to the President and Senior Director for counter Terrorism at the National Security Council. In addition to that, he worked as a national security advisor for the Senior Council for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence looking at a lot of the Russia stuff. So this guy was part of the inside. He saw the FBI, the d o J

up close. He knows what he's talking about. So we're gonna revisit Russia Gate, get into some of these double standards if due process even exists in America right now. And I'm also going to ask him, you know, do you think there's ever, ever, ever going to be any accountability for these bad actors, any accountability from the Special Council investigation John Durham's investigation. So that's what we're going to get into today. So stay tuned for my interview

with Cash Patela. That's the last time I saw you. We were at an event, we got to sit next to each other. That was my first time meeting you, uh, and it was awesome. I really enjoyed meeting you and we had great conversation. So it's awesome to have you on the show. Yeah, we can. Thanks so much. I had a blast at the Independent Women's Forum Gallow with you and so many others, and I'm so happy we'll be on your show, which is doing so amazing. Thanks. I appreciate it, and you've got a new book out

which we'll get into as well. But you know, so I was thinking the other day about, you know, obviously this January six circus, it's getting so much attention, and you know what I was thinking to myself, Okay, so we've got all this focus on January six, But for four years, the deep state, the administrative state, whatever you want to call it, essentially attempted to coop against the sitting president for four years. Is that not wild to you? I don't know. Is it his hypocrisy or even the

right word. I mean, I don't even know that they they the liberal left even know it means, look at a guy who ran the Russia Gate investigation, shouldn't expose the entire criminal conspiracy that the Hillary Clinton campaign paid for the dossier? And now the Alpha Bank thing, which leads to John Durham, which just shows you the heights

or the depths, I guess, of their their hypocrisy. And now they're the ones when you fast forward to January six, who are saying President Trump, you know, it's attempting a coup of the democracy. And you know, at the time, I was chief of staff of the Department of Defense.

And you know, I've been saying just this week that I don't understand where this language from the January six Committee about a coup comes from, because the chain of command at the White House ordered the Department of Defense to transition the presidency to the incoming Biden administration. So those two facts don't sit well together, but they don't want to cover the fact that the White House ordered us to transition and so there would be no coup. Well.

And then also, you know, you look at a lot of this stuff that happened with the incoming administration. I mean, they were trying to derail a president who just got elected with President Trump as he was transitioning to the White House. So I mean, you know what I mean, you had, like the Obama administration using the FBI to investigate an incoming president of the you know, opposing political party. But it's just insane. I mean, there's never any accountability.

The media has never given it justice and trying to pay attention and let us know what really happened. You know, So somebody was there what really happened? Yeah? Wow, RUSTI Gate lived it, breathed it, still doing it. Um, you know, I was hired by Devin Unez, the Chairman of House until to run the Russia Gate investigation. And I don't think either of us at the time knew would be the depravity of the criminality would be so far reaching.

But you know, we kept the same concept of we owe the American people the facts and the truth, no matter where it leads us. And then because the facts and the truth led us to proving that the Hillary Clinton campaign illegally used campaign funds to spend tens of millions of dollars through a law firm to hire the likes of Usan Gps and Christopher Steele, and now we're talking about tech executive Joffey. They ran two lines of effort.

They ran the Steel dossier and Track one, and a parallel effort will call it the Alpha Bank Server line of effort on Track two, all of which was funded entirely by the Clinton campaign. And what they did was they've got false information statting to the FBI. The FBI knew it was false, and on Track one, they utilized that information to unlawfully surveil and lie to a federal court to unlawfully surveil a presidential candidate in this campaign.

I mean, as a former federal prosecutor who used the fies, the process the target terrorists, I was just stunned that this was this could occur in the United States of America. But if, as if that wasn't enough, on a parallel track, they paid this tech executive, Rodney Joffey Um to burrow

into the White House servers. I mean, you can't make this stuff up, and to report out that Donald Trump and his building in New York City were somehow connect that to Russia when they weren't, and the FBI knew all of the information they received was from the Clinton campaign. They hid that they also knew the information was totally false. And what you have is people's lives being ruined and the likes of Adam Shift coming in this disinforming America

in the world for four years. It's really tragic when you think about it, and you hit it right on the head. Americans want accountability and they're just haven't been much um, which is why I hope, you know, John Durham comes up with a little more of this summer. And what's really frustrating, to your point, is that they knew this information was false. I mean they knew this.

I mean the CIA. According to Michael Horrotz, the Independent Inspector General the d o J and his investigation of all this, if the CIA chalked it up to an Internet rumor, right, it was known that Carter Page was working on behalf of the United States government, not against it. So it's like they knew who This was a lie.

And I think that's the most disgusting part of it and the most chilling part of it for so many Americas as we're sitting here saying we can't trust the FBI, right like they actively worked against a Republican president, they actively worked against the American people and our wishes. No, you're absolutely right. And you know me as a former intel guy, you know who's did on tours in the civilian,

in the military, and intel community. It was shocking to learn that John Brennan, then the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, would go to the President of the United States Obama in December of sixteen and report this information to Obama. And all we have are some scribbled notes about what John Brennan said, but he from those notes we were able to glean that he informed Barack Obama, sitting president that Hillary Clinton, a campaign for president, was

orchestrating a plan to take down Donald Trump. So I want to know where that where's that memo that John Brennan gave and briefed Barack Obama to back then? And if it got to the President of the United States, why wasn't their actual action taken rather than they what they did was they continued to surveil Donald Trump after he got into the White House, and they did it on the information, as you said, which they knew to

be totally false. Um, it's just outrageous. And you know, now the media is like blown past their lives for four years by saying, oh, whatever, you know that happened so long ago, let's just focus on January six. It's almost as if they none of them want to correct the record. And Adam Ship is still talking about Russia Gate as if it happened yesterday, and if as if if Donald Trump is still an agent of Russia, and and we're going to keep going and we're gonna put

out as much information as we can. Um, the show that's completely false. Well, and I think to me, what really just highlighted what a scam it all was. And for whatever reason, this just like has always come to

my mind, is that meeting. I believe it was January six, when before President Trump was inaugurated and the FBI director James Coby had briefed Trump in Trump Tower, but only only on the SILESIAUS details of the dossier, and then somehow it ended up leaking to the media this meet in between James Comey and Trump, which then gave the media the ability to go and publish the dossier because they couldn't publish it previously because of course it was unproven.

It's still unproven because it's not true. It's in fact Russian disinformation. But so that gave the media the leeway to then publish something that they couldn't substantiate. So it's like it just shows you, you know, just the ties between the way the media worked along with the FBI, along with the Clinton campaign to try to bury Donald Trump. No, you're right, the right. It showed you the how the hierarchy, if the FBI could selectively politicize law enforcement and the

intelligence community against the political candidate. It's that's something that you would expect in a banana republic, not in the United States of America. And we would go on the show.

In our investigation that this reverse, this briefing that James Comey gave to then candidate Trump or then elected President Trump was only done as you said in part, but the entire time, we proved that they were giving the Hillary Clinton campaign full and complete reverse briefings, as we call them, to keep her aprise of national security matters that impacted her campaign. Why the two different levels of comparison or to two different levels of standards in briefings

for issue to Clinton versus Donald Trump. And it's just because of the politics. Andy McCabe, the deputy director of the FBI, and James Comey orchestrated this entire enterprise lied to the American people and the federal court system just because of their hatred for Donald Trump. I mean, Lisa, the fact that you and I are having this conversation in the US is just striking. And most people in America four years later, unfortunately, just think, oh, what's Russia Gate.

Oh that's thing where Donald Trump, you know, acted on behalf of Russia. And that's totally not true. And we put up all the information for free on places like

durhamwatch dot com. All the pleadings, all the transcripts. I took sixty sworn testimony myself when I was doing the Russia Gate investigation, because we want Americans to go there and read the black and mites for themselves, read with Podesta and Luke and Sullivan, infusion, GPS in the cave, and Combe and Struck and all these corrupt actors said under oath, because that's the best way to educate people on what happened, not giving him a summary, but giving

him the opportunity to read it for themselves. Well. And it's also I mean, you look at how much these people hated Trump, right like if Robert Mueller could actually have if he actually was able to find any anything, any semblance of a tie between do not think he even tried to bury him at the end by you know, sort of hanging over this, uh you know, the obstruction but not really good you know what I mean, like just trying to leave that carrot carrot out there for

for the So if he had something like you know, for sure, that would have been the base, you know what I mean, they would have gone for that so hard after all the crap they put Trump through and they didn't have anything and so it's like that that right there shows you they didn't have anything, and so many people in the media have missed that point. I'm so glad you you put that on. You know, I'll

there that you lead with your best facts. If you are a special counsel, and you know the January six Committee, I'm sure we'll talk about it. They're doing the same thing. They put on this Hollywood blitz like Mueller tried to do. And if they actually had incriminating evidence evidence said Donald Trumper's campaign committed a crime or did something unlawful or unethical, they would have led with it. The fact that they didn't lead with it tells you they didn't have anything.

Muller didn't find any information to substantiate a claim. And as my friend John Durham excuse me, John Ratcliffe, the former d n I said so beautifully back then when he was questioning Mueller under oath, was you have now created a new standard for lawyers at the Department of Justice, because you're asking them to to not prove a crime, but to prove someone didn't do something, which has never

been a standard in the United States of America. But Bob Muller attributed that standard to Donald Trump, and I love that the Left sinks that that's actually an actual legal standard and has completely disbanded with due process. And you know, it's or their their version of selective due process. They only like to apply it when the targets are their political enemies, like the FBI did. But you're absolutely right they would have led with it. They didn't because

there isn't any information to support their claims. And again just on like a very base level. What's always blown my mind as we spent all this tax paramony, all these resources of the FBI and then a special council to look at you know, quote unquote Russian interference, when in fact it was the Hillary Clinton campaign and our own government that we're pushing Russian disinformation in the name

of the dossier. So it's like, I think that just blows my mind, as you know, we spent all this money, all this intention, or all this attention when in fact it was like our own government in the Hillary Clinton

campaign embracing Russian disafformation. Yeah, and what I tell people is, you know, go back and read the nunest memo that I drafted, you know, some four years ago and see if it's switched to the test of time, because what we put in the Nunest memo were hard facts obtained by the FBI's own documents and by their own foreign testimony about the activities of Bruce or being a cutout Bruce Or being a top level prosecutor at the Department of Justice, and the FBI using him as a source

to get to Christopher Steele when Christoper Steel was fired for lying to the FBI um and things like that, you know where they lied to the Federal Court UH to get a surveillance warrant on Donald Trump, but they withheld information including evidence of innocence, basically evidence showing that the target of the warrant was actually innocent of the crime that they were alleging in that warrant application. And to me, as a former and after security prosecutor, you know,

acts like this aren't actually seditious acts. You're you're intentionally utilizing government falsely to take out members of government or members who were elected to serve in government. And you know, I think it's just outrageous that most of America has been led so far down a path of misinformation by the likes of Adam shift that you know, you know, Devin and I and you know even President Trump are not going to stop trying to get out there and

make sure people have access to the real information. So I'm very thankful you're still talking about it today. Quick commercial break back on the other side with cash Ptel. So when did the investigation into the Trump campaign open? Because the the FBI. I know that you've referenced in your book The Plot Against the King, which is a children's book that is out now officially, I think right, it's out now officially. Yeah, it's out now officially, Yeah, exactly.

And you know you reference that it started with the dossier, the FBI claims and the media claims it started. Um, the counterintelligence investigation started based off of what George Papadopoulos told Alexander Downer. Everyone knows, the Australian diplomat. YadA, YadA, YadA. When when what does the timeline look like? When when

did the investigation actually begin? You know, I'm glad you're bringing that up because the fact that I put that in my children's book and the fact that the New York Times, I think in like three other entities have done hit pieces on on me and it based on that.

You know, the Russia Gate is based on the Steel dossier, and Christopher Steele started putting that dossier together in the spring of It doesn't be the FBI pretended and used as a pretext the meeting with Alexander Downer in the bar room chit chat to quote unquote launched their investigation. That doesn't mean that's when the investigation started. That just

means when the FBI put it to paper. But a source for the FBI, Christopher Steele began working on his dossier in at least the spring of sixteen, if not earlier. That's why I put it in the children's book. It is the single piece of information that kicked off the FBI's you know, quote unquote interest in the Donald Trump campaign. So I stand by that. I think it's which the test of time, and the fact that the fake news media is attacking a children's book on Russia Gate, I

think is just hilarious to me. Well, and it sort of defies reason that Christopher Steele has not seeved more scrutiny. I mean, the man does not have credibility. He also had a clear animus against President or than you know, candidate Trump, as well, So it sort of defies logic that he hasn't received more scrutiny. You know, I wanted to get into just the the double standard innerjustice system.

You know, We've obviously touched on it, you know, quite a bit here, but I mean, you look at the fact that the January six Committee is using contempt of Congress charges to arrest people like Peter Navarro. Yet yeah, you see Hillary Clinton's campaign lawyer Michael Sussman acquitted of

lying to the FBI. We saw the same thing with the FBI's treatment of the Hillary Clinton campaign and the emails or Hillary Clinton in the email server with giving you know, Cheryl Mills and Humba Abadan things like immunity while sticking it to Michael Flynn, Peter Struck interviewed all of them in different outcomes, right, So so you know it's just yeah, I guess just you get into that for for the audience, just this gross double standard heard and our justice system. You know, I guess you know

how entrenched is it? You're right, and look as it infuriates me probably more than anything else because I was a public defender first when my career started, and then I became a federal prosecutor, tears and prosecutor. And I didn't think then that there could possibly be two standards, but I now firmly believe that there are. And it's uh, it shreds, you know, it shreds the constitution. Uh. You highlighted probably the best examples of what this double standard is.

I mean, the suspen jury. Real quick, they were they

were literally played the videotape of the bank robbery. Uh. And they acquitted this man because the jurors went out afterwards and literally said this, this case was a total waste that should never been brought, which means they were going to acquit him no matter what because of their politics, because the fact that four of the jurors were Hillary Clinton donors and AOC donors, and so they violated their oaths and and this case, you know, should This is

what happens when you bring cases in d C. But that's it doesn't stop there. You know, you brought up Christopher Steel. Christopher Steele wrote to the FBI when he was creating his phony Dostier that he actually despised Donald Trump and he would do anything to get him to prevent him from being elected. They failed to provide that information that they knew to the federal court. And Steele was the source of the entire Russia Gate hoax. And

this is the type of information the FBI suppressed. And then, um, you know, there's so many other examples we could go down. But as you mentioned, like how the FBI investigated the likes of Michael Flynn, they did the same thing to him. There was actually evidence of innocence of Michael Flynn that the FBI suppressed before, during, and after they brought charges

against Michael Flynn. When I was Deputy Director of National Intelligence, me and Rick Grannell actually declassified the information that the FBI hid from the world, and we forced the Department of Justice to then acknowledge this information. And that's why Michael Flynn's case was ultimately thrown out. You know, this isn't supposed to happen in America, where the FBI selectively sits on um information that favors a charge, clients or

a defendant. Um a completely shredding due process knowingly does it not by accident. They knew about it, they collected it, they knew it to be false. And you know, the jam six Commission is just an extension of that. I can speak to that personally as the first person who is subpoena by the January six commission. Cost me two d thousand dollars in lawyer fees to adjudicate the subpoena, and when I went before them, I said, why didn't

you guys just call me? I've got nothing behind the chief of staff of d O D. I can tell you exactly what we did. I can tell you exactly when Donald Trump authorized National Guard troops forty eight hours before, and the fact that Nancy Pelosi is a Capitol police and Mayor Bowser declined that National Guard service. But they don't want to hear any of that. They wanted to politicize the national security apparatus. And I have to find out about my subpoena from a late night phone call

from the Washington Post. You can believe it, well, I can't believe it. Sadly, I wish I couldn't, but you know, that's the world that we live in. I also, I just like to apply a common sense standard to everything in life. It's like they're trying to tell us the FBI had no involvement in January six. However, even liberal outlets like The Daily Beast reported that I think it was more than half of the people involved, and the Gretchman Gretchan whitmore a plot, were you know, agents of

the FBI or FBI informants or whatever. But then we're not supposed to believe that January six couldn't be the same, or you know, we're we're told that, you know, Peter Struck and Lisa Page texting about how they're going to stop Trump. They hate him. He's like basically Satan Hitler all the you know. I mean, they didn't say that specifically, but you know, they might as well write that somehow that's not going to taint their objectivity in looking at that.

You know, it's like it's like we're not idiots, right, Like, it's just all you have to do is apply the common sense standard to most things in life, and common sense typically prevails not for society, but if you actually, you know, want to find the truth, it's typically just what appears to be common sense. No, you're absolutely right, and like the common sense standard is what you're supposed to tell jurors. That's what we told them when we were when I was trying cases before before juries and

state in federal court. And the truth is, at the end of the day, what you know, those who in government. You know, when I served for sixteen years, that was the mission and it just got torn to shred intentionally by government agents. I mean, that's what led me to write a children's book on Russia Gate. I mean, the plot against the king isn't a political story. It's not you should be a conservative or liberal or democratic Republican.

Those words don't even appear in the pages. But I thought the biggest criminal scandal to occur to American modern history should that truth should be told to our children. So we said it in medieval times with the characters like Hillary Clinton and a shifty Night and a duke named Devon. You know, we had fun with it, but we told them the importance of doing finding the truth,

going on a quest for the truth. And the illustrations are hilarious and they're fun, and the fact that Google and Amazon just shut the book down is is laughable. The fact that the Humpington's Post is do hit pieces on me because I wrote a children's book about Russia Gate just means to me, what the same thing that was five years ago we're so over the target. They hate the fact that we discovered the truth and now they're triggered that we're educating the truths to our kids.

And you know, and and selfishly, if I can say, the Plot against the King dot Com is where you get the book. But it's the number one kid's book in the country. And and I'm gonna keep doing it. I think we have two more books now coming. It's been so popular about telling the truth to our kids. That's awesome. And and also just do process right, Like I'm due process is something that separates the United States

from other countries. And I guess my broader concern and all of this is we've just seen the breakdown and institutions, trust institutions. We've seen the breakdown of due process, the rule of law in America. And when you lose these things that make America America like, we really just end up descending into chaos. And then we descend into these situations where you've got people in the January six Committee not allowing for due process and to destroying lives just

based off of their political beliefs. The following is not something I've ever discussed on on any interview I was a public defender for eight years, and you know, when I got there, I just went there because I thought everybody deserved, as you said, due process and all the rights in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, not selectively,

but everybody. And you know, the public defender community is largely a liberal community, and when I went there, I was shocked to learn from my liberal colleagues that they would say, oh, I'm only going to do this case or take that case. The same group of people that selectively applied due process but talked about in the media as if they were the exclusive you know, warriors of due process stopped talking to me when Donald Trump got

elected and I ran the rush of Gate investigation. I was just shocked to learn that they could actually selectively apply due process to their targets that they wanted and then only allowed you process for their clients that they thought had the right to it. I didn't know due process was something that was hijacked by the liberal left.

It was. It was just extraordinary to me to learn that lesson and those people haven't called me in eight years, um, which just shows you how divided and how how how how hypocritical. Um. Folks in government can be and it was. It was. It was one of the most stinging lessons I've learned. But do process, as you said, it's supposed to be the bedrock of our society. It's why it was a public defender and a prosecutor, one of the

few people to ever do that. And um, it's selective application in January six just is an extension of their hypocrisy. Now they're throwing out not just subpoenas, but they're they're they're putting out subpoenas but criminal indictments because they want this narrative to carry on that Donald Trump tried to quote unquote hijack the election or do a coup or all this false information. And now the committee itself is on.

I think they took a day long pause because there's so much in fighting they can't get their stories straight. Um that this is what happens when you lead with politics and not the facts. So I think this Commission's days are are numbered, and America's at least most of America is hip to the fact that they're putting out disinformation. Well, and you know now they're going after Jenny Thomas Clarence.

Justice Clarence Thomas is. I mean, they're just using it as a way to hit people that they don't like. But I mean Trump was right when he said everything turns to ship because they've ruined everything right that, But it's true, like the f the left is ruined, the FBI, the left is ruined, the d o J the left

is room to the NFL, the left is ruined. You know, they left is ruined, the even tainting the Supreme Court, which with the leak of the reverse way to pit right, like they've literally ruined everything in America, and like all of our issues really stem from them. But I know we both got some time constraints, so I wanted to ask you, do you think there's ever going to be any accountability from this with the Special Counsel John Durham's investigation.

Been one of the few proponents of John Durham since the beginning, because I know how long it takes to put together these types of prosecutions. It takes years and years, and he's on year two to an alf and he's got a team of like five folks. And the reason I say it is because and for those in your audience who want to dive into the details, go to durham Watch dot com totally free, where we constantly put up all the information, all the pleadings. But he leveled.

He laid out a joint venture conspiracy and as you know, Lisa, that's a legal term. Um during the Sussmen prosecution, where he told the federal court under oath, i'm I have many more targets to this investigation. This is just one of them. The targets include the Fusion GPS is of the world. They include tech executive Rodney Joffe, where John Durham explicitly said the man continues to be a target. They include Fusion GPS who will perpetuate this fraud, Glenn

Simpson and Company. And it includes FBI agents who admitted during the Sussman case on the witness stand that they are targets of a federal investigation for lying while overseeing the Russia Gate hopes. So all of this information leads me to believe that John Durham is building a criminal conspiracy case um that takes time. I think he utilized the Suspen trial knowing it was going to be in d C and knowing it's gonna likely be very tough

to get a connection. But look at all the information he's put out there, everything I just talked to you about, and all the targets he has publicly said our targets

of his investigation. So I think this summer you're going to see a couple of more indictments against the FBI and the likes of Fusion GPS, and you know, encourage people to go to durhmawatch dot com and read all the transcripts and testimony for yourselves that we did during our Russia Gate investigation, which John Durham is now using those documents in his prosecution of the people um who

perpetuated this fraud. I don't think it'll go to Hillary Clinton, James Comey, that'll that'll be in the Durham report at the very end. But I think we will have some form of meaningful accountability by the time we u we see this year come to a close. Do you think

it's possible to get justice in the swamp. Well, that's why I made a big point in on you know, on after the last verdict, that these cases need to be brought outside of the swamp, and at least the den Shanko case, the one sets for trial in the fall Dan chanco is Christopher Steel. Source that John Durham is indicted is in Virginia. Um, you know John Durham, I've publicly advised him. I don't know. I haven't talked to him personally. But these cases can be brought elsewhere

in the country because they can find jurisdiction elsewhere. They don't have to be brought in and around d C. I think that's what John durhams one flaw as these two by the book in the Department of Justice guidelines recommend to you where you can bring cases and and whatnot. But I think he should start bringing them elsewhere so he can show America that, you know, there is no more of this two standard tier of justice. Um, they've they've seen what the swamp produces and that's why they

that's why they can't stand it. So hopefully bring some of these cases in the future away from Washington. Yeah. Well, well, hopefully the assessment verdict has opened his eyes to up against Cash. But tell I appreciate your time. The plot against the King it is out, now go get it. Obviously the left wing meet it hates it, which means that Cash is doing something right. So I appreciate it. Nice to talk to you, and uh, you know, good luck with the book and congrats on the success so far.

Thank you, we'll talk to you and have a great weekend. That was cast until really enjoyed the interview with him. Obviously he's seen it from the inside, so he knows what's up. So and I think it's good to revisit this right Like, if the media doesn't want us to talk about it, then we should talk about it. So that was the point of that. If you enjoy the show, please go to Apple get us five stars, leave us a review. As always, thank you so much for listening.

I really appreciate it. Please share this with your friends, your family, social media. Get the word out every Monday, every Thursday. And I want to thank my executive producer, John Cassio for putting the show together. Thanks everyone,